BATTLE | Rolex Daytona vs. Omega Speedmaster 321
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 чер 2024
- In this video, we're going to evaluate the two best-known chronographs in history, the @ROLEX Daytona and the @OMEGA Speedmaster 321, to see which one is better.
Let me know in the comments section which one is your favorite.
Instagram:
@lets.talkaboutluxury
321 for me.. much classier because it doesn't scream. 321 speaks class. Daytona screams for attention...the 321 is a connoisseur's watch.🎉
Agree 100%
suckers are born every sec......most of them are in the watch world.
You did the right thing and bought both. I have the 321 and one day will own the Daytona too. Both are legends in their own right.
I would choose the Speedmaster for about the same reason as you mentioned.
Love the 321 too, perfect watch.
Connoisseur's choice
Good video but there is a little bit of misinformation. No date window on the professional and the Daytona is not a 40 even though its marketed as one.
The Speedy is a watch marking achievement and history, the Daytona is a watch marking the need to show off, often to pretend wealth. In the race for space, Omega was better. And in the area of racing, it is Heuer that was the legendary brand, not Rolex nor Omega. Which is why I wear my 1967 321 or Heuer 1960s chronographs. But a gold Daytona will look way more exquisite on a female wrist. Finally, the Lemania 2310 - the essence of the 321 - made it to Patek Philippe, Vacheron Constantin and Breguet, a movement created as the Lemania CH 27 in the 1930s. When the Daytona movement makes it to Patek, Vacheron and Breguet, it can perhaps be a contender, maybe.
Date on the professional model!?
As you watned to keep both watch, most of the people would like to have both.
My choise is Omega 321 Ed White..I dont like lugs on Daytona ,on left and right side difference of lugs are very visible ..looks like one part of Daytona is 39mm anather 37mm..
Both are ceramic bezel I believed
yes they are both ceramic the "normal" speedmaster is not ceramic but the 321, apollo 55th etc are also ceramic. I would still give the point to the rolex for the 100m but for the rest the 321 is at least as good.
I appreciate your review. I have a 1966 321 (pre-moon, serpent back). Completely refurbished by omega. I really like the Daytona, but am not inclined to have two chronographs. I swim daily and wish the speedmaster was waterproof.
Ironically only 3 Omega Speedmasters were worn on the moon. All the while 7 Rolex GMTs were worn on the moon.
Great objective review of two special watches, however IMHO, the Daytona is for people who want to “show-how” much money they have (most paying premiums or spending a fortune on stuff they don’t want to get one), versus the Omega is for people who appreciate the “know-how” of Omega watchmaking. Don’t take my word for it, trust NASA’s opinion 🚀
There are about 1500 321's made per year. Since 2020, that is 4500. Very low production. While demand is much lower, the 321 is significantly rarer, which will be a benefit in the longer run. Then there is added benefit of not having to worry about getting jacked for your high-production, automatic winding Rolex in which you can't even see the movement (which admittedly is very good--but very industrial).
Have them both. The Daytona isnt that impressive and I regret buying it. I also have a Deepsea and Blue Sky-Dweller and both are much more wrist presence than the Daytona.
So Id buy the Omega for the $$
compre with 3861 please :)
I swap my 321 and 126500 white daily. I lean toward 321 due to legibility and movement.
321 was first omega inhouse movement..also Ed white use this movement on space walk ..
You mention that the professional model Speedmaster has a date, but that is not correct, as most of us know
Have to disagree with you on the rarity part, the SS 321 is way waaaaaay more rare than the Daytona, not even close.
I agree with you, but the demand Vs offer on the Daytona is off scale.
Of course Omega 321...
Daytona is dressier and more feminine. Speedmaster is sportier and more masculine!!
How is the Rolex a better investment?Most people like yourself paid Grey Market price or as you put premium.The Speedmaster you can get at retail with a little patience.I rather pay $15000 for the Speedy which is bringing $20k then pay $30k for a Daytona that's market is $30k how's that a better investment?And what about the fools that paid 40-50k for a Panda how are you liking your $20k lost in value not a great INVESTMENT.Lmao Buy a watch because you LOVE IT and Invest with Vanguard or Fidelity!lol
This comparison makes no sense! one is automatic and the other has a 50 year old manual caliber! you should have compared a caliber 321 to a caliber 727! 😵💫
If you are going to compare the base Daytona then don’t use the 321. Use a different Daytona
I stopped watching when a point was given to the Daytona over the Speedmaster because of the ceramic bezel: clueless reviewer.
Also, screw-down pushers are just stupid, but that's just my opinion.
You did the right thing and bought both. I have the 321 and one day will own the Daytona too. Both are legends in their own right.
Hi, yes, it’s true but I also have the GP Laureato that in my opinion is better then both 😉