I was watching this video thinking it was' big boy' poker podcast. When I looked at your creds, you have only 6k subscribers. Wow! You are a great interviewer and our show is professionally done. I predict your show will go far. .Good luck!
He gets the Dunning Krueger effect wrong. It's not thinking you're good at everything just because you're good at one thing. It's a cognitive bias where people with limited knowledge or skills in a particular area overestimate their competence. When you are a beginner you imagine you're great and as you gain more experience, ironically, your self-assessment drops as you start to realize how much their is to Poker/chess/golf, whatever. The inspiration for the Dunning-Kruger study actually came from a bizarre incident involving a bank robber named McArthur Wheeler. In 1995, Wheeler attempted to rob two banks in Pittsburgh with his face covered in lemon juice, believing it would make him invisible to security cameras. He thought this because lemon juice can be used as an invisible ink-he mistakenly assumed it would work the same way on his face. Wheeler’s flawed reasoning and overconfidence puzzled law enforcement, prompting David Dunning to investigate how someone could be so sure of something that was completely wrong. This curiosity led Dunning and his colleague Justin Kruger to conduct studies on the relationship between skill level, competence, and self-assessment, eventually formalizing their findings as the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Horrible advice for someone with a gambling addiction. If you have lost your rent money or worse and or are in real debt because you gamble then you are not being helped by this video. Gambling is designed to take advantage of peoples desire and pleasure of winning. The one major problem is gambling requires one or more participants to lose. That house always wins and if you are not the house you will lose. If you have lost from gambling and are struggling to survive then you are a victim. Stop and realize that you are an addict and are harming yourself and possibly your family.
@@halfbit The point is the math stands behind any casino game. So if you play roulette or blackjack you are trying to fight math against the odds. Poker is different. It's more of psychology, logic and emotion control.You can be a winning player, the problem is plenty don't realize they are always beaten by the better player not a casino
Cards go in cycles, patience is key. All in with Rockets, Rockets call... I get 4 flushed! Played Paradise before it got shut down, talking with the guy that had taught me Hold-em, we talked about me having a period of back luck, Tim was the one who told me to relax, the cards run in cycles. Bought me in for $30 tourney, won it just under $8,000.00 Paradise Poker sent me a check I received in 3-4 days!
We love our host Samir Mourani! Hope you enjoyed the episode and decided to subscribe as it helps us a ton to keep having these kinds of conversations.
@@drunksocratic3900 Joe Rogan is a muppet plant who does damage control and steers you away from the truth. It's TIME to stop eating garbage food and to wake up.
I like watching DN. He's fun to watch while he's destroying some opponent. I think he's on 100% of the time. Especially in these interviews. I get the impression that the stories he tells are almost always tinged with a story that's almost right. Just enough wrongness to be exploited. I think he sets things up all the time. I'd be interested in how his side betting action is doing.
Of all the charity casinos I’ve gone into back in the early 90’s in Toronto as a teenager, stupid me tried to learn Black Jack…if only I knew of Hold Em, maybe could’ve learned the game with DN.
I like DG a lot, and the host is decent. One thing I would have loved is not to jump so quickly from one theme to another. Many questions deserved a follow up q. But good job host, you will do good things!
What Daniel is trying to tell people is that everybody loses everybody wins that's how you react and come back from those wins and losses that makes you a professional and then you can actually make a living doing something you enjoy and I really enjoy it is what Daniel says so he is right he is playing 100% of what he wants tsays just like he says do you want to be😊 first and then get what you want😊😊 will follow show most people think about the get the money then you can get the things and then you can be who you want to be what he says is Go reverse baguette and says be who you want to be first then get the money get the fame second because without becoming who you want to be you'll never get the money or the fame fame😊
Fedor and bryn was beaten by 2 recreational players known as ossi and vlad at the final four in the triton $150 k buy in even some notable names such greenwood,chidwick and Dan smit was at th FT.
Some of the worst in poker?? Bro you’re not a poker player so you just don’t get it. Not to be rude but I don’t think any real poker player can take your question seriously and the fact you can’t spell doesn’t help.
@@brandonnel4687there are certain ways so make money long term if you’re good enough. Putting in high volume in cash games will even out your equity long term. Tournament poker is far more luck based. In fact, I doubt there are any self made tournament pros that play in mid stakes circuits who don’t have any backers or swap action (purchase a percentage of each other’s tournament buy ins) with other players). You can be a winning player and have 3-4 losing months in cash poker. You need to have the bankroll to withstand those downswings. However, depending on a few different factors, you can be a winning tournament player and have 3-4 losing YEARS before you get a huge win. It’s just not something most full time pros can do.
What I would like to know…..he says you can make all the right decisions and still lose, on the flip side, how possible is it to make wrong decisions and still win? What’s the % of those 2 instances….if that’s even possible to calculate?
I can't give you an exact figure, but yes, in the short term you can make poor decisions and still win. But making that same set of poor decisions in the long run will result in an overall loss
It’s very difficult to quantify exact numbers because everyone’s skill level varies and different spots happen so often that almost no two hands play out the same way twice. I’m a semi professional player and I always like to think of it this way: If I get all the money in as an 80% favorite, which is about as good as you can hope for in poker, then I win the hand, I actually got 20% lucky. Does that make sense? Over time, those scenarios will even out as you run into them over and over again. If the other player wins, they got 80% lucky. It’s just the inverse of your probability. There are some people who got 80% lucky multiple times in a row in gigantic spots like the main event of the World Series, and that equity will never even out. Take Jerry Yang for instance. Not a talented player, but got lucky multiple times and won the main event for millions. The equity will probably never tip the other way for him. The other day I lost the biggest pot I’ve ever played for $5,000. My opponent had a 1% chance to scoop the entire pot but hit 2 miracle cards. It will take me a long time to run into 100 more scenarios like that, so I doubt I’ll ever recover equity wise. So even if you’re a massive winner, luck actually may play a factor long term.
What's the pros do is what others don't they risk more and build a reputation when they win for others to loan money to them when they lose just like Daniel did😊😊
What would you do if people only used AI assistance😊 I think what would happen if you lose the original aspect of the game of the film the risk the entry the darkness that cigarette center of and now it's becoming more of a tournament type environment and everyone tells a long time how long do you have to wait they waste time and 10 million dollars
I like Daniel negreanu a lot and I watch all those videos the only thing I don't like is and I can have this opinion doesn't mean it's valuable but the thing I don't like is he says I'm born and raised in Toronto but he also says when he was 18 he left and went straight to Vegas then many times lost everything he had then he came back after he learned and borrowed and won lot's but for age 18 to age 50 , 32 years of practice and luck 😢but stick it to em later 😮
It's all about the money and the Canadians say we're not going to play our Canadian tournaments in other places because it takes away money for our Canada oh Canada.....😊 So basically if you play online tournaments in the USA or regular tournaments in the USA and you're a Canadian resident that means the taxes and certain profits and benefits will only go to the US side not the Canadian side that's how the government works😅
Definition of a troll. Say some negative sht yet he didn’t have a problem click’n on it. Miserable life. Then again if you don’t have a troll or two sayn neg sht then you’re prob doin something wrong lol
The person conducting the interview is outstanding. Well done!
I was watching this video thinking it was' big boy' poker podcast. When I looked at your creds, you have only 6k subscribers. Wow! You are a great interviewer and our show is professionally done. I predict your show will go far. .Good luck!
He gets the Dunning Krueger effect wrong. It's not thinking you're good at everything just because you're good at one thing. It's a cognitive bias where people with limited knowledge or skills in a particular area overestimate their competence. When you are a beginner you imagine you're great and as you gain more experience, ironically, your self-assessment drops as you start to realize how much their is to Poker/chess/golf, whatever.
The inspiration for the Dunning-Kruger study actually came from a bizarre incident involving a bank robber named McArthur Wheeler. In 1995, Wheeler attempted to rob two banks in Pittsburgh with his face covered in lemon juice, believing it would make him invisible to security cameras. He thought this because lemon juice can be used as an invisible ink-he mistakenly assumed it would work the same way on his face.
Wheeler’s flawed reasoning and overconfidence puzzled law enforcement, prompting David Dunning to investigate how someone could be so sure of something that was completely wrong. This curiosity led Dunning and his colleague Justin Kruger to conduct studies on the relationship between skill level, competence, and self-assessment, eventually formalizing their findings as the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Horrible advice for someone with a gambling addiction. If you have lost your rent money or worse and or are in real debt because you gamble then you are not being helped by this video. Gambling is designed to take advantage of peoples desire and pleasure of winning. The one major problem is gambling requires one or more participants to lose. That house always wins and if you are not the house you will lose. If you have lost from gambling and are struggling to survive then you are a victim. Stop and realize that you are an addict and are harming yourself and possibly your family.
Sounds like the idiot effect.
@@halfbit The point is the math stands behind any casino game. So if you play roulette or blackjack you are trying to fight math against the odds. Poker is different. It's more of psychology, logic and emotion control.You can be a winning player, the problem is plenty don't realize they are always beaten by the better player not a casino
sure. but it still leaks into the dunning kruger effect.
if you're good at one thing you'll overestimate your competence in other areas.
@@halfbitI wonder where he got the lemon juice
great interview Samir. Was a pleasure meeting you at the NAPTCUP.
Cards go in cycles, patience is key. All in with Rockets, Rockets call... I get 4 flushed! Played Paradise before it got shut down, talking with the guy that had taught me Hold-em, we talked about me having a period of back luck, Tim was the one who told me to relax, the cards run in cycles. Bought me in for $30 tourney, won it just under $8,000.00 Paradise Poker sent me a check I received in 3-4 days!
Great questions, great interviewer, great watch. Man, I ♥poker
Amazing interview , allot of young coming on the scene poker players could learn allot here. Some really really good questions asked!
We love our host Samir Mourani!
Hope you enjoyed the episode and decided to subscribe as it helps us a ton to keep having these kinds of conversations.
A lot
Samir is a world-class interviewer. Stellar.
One of the best interviews I've ever seen you're good at asking questions dog thank you
I think it's just about letting the interviewee tell his story and asking questions that open doors for that. It's a subtle skill and Samir has it.
Great interview. I'm really impressed with your style and look forward to seeing more.
Fantastic interview! Thank you!❤❤❤
You need timestamps if you want a successful podcast
Does Joe Rogan have timestamps?
@@drunksocratic3900 No he has cult like followers
@@drunksocratic3900 Joe Rogan is a muppet plant who does damage control and steers you away from the truth. It's TIME to stop eating garbage food and to wake up.
@@drunksocratic3900 who's Joe Rogan?
@@Anlonnbro
Great video but there was like only a few lines about reading people.
Dan's a real one, authentic.
Daniel has always been my favorite player to watch. Tony g. Is a close second. Fun players to watch
Enjoyed the interview.
Proud to be Romanian and hear this
Very cool video! Would it be possible to raise the audio levels? The gain seems a bit low. Big fan of DNegs, great interview!
Appreciate the feedback! We'll make sure to pay closer attention to that so you have a more enjoyable experience!
I like watching DN. He's fun to watch while he's destroying some opponent. I think he's on 100% of the time. Especially in these interviews. I get the impression that the stories he tells are almost always tinged with a story that's almost right. Just enough wrongness to be exploited. I think he sets things up all the time. I'd be interested in how his side betting action is doing.
Of all the charity casinos I’ve gone into back in the early 90’s in Toronto as a teenager, stupid me tried to learn Black Jack…if only I knew of Hold Em, maybe could’ve learned the game with DN.
I like DG a lot, and the host is decent. One thing I would have loved is not to jump so quickly from one theme to another. Many questions deserved a follow up q.
But good job host, you will do good things!
What Daniel is trying to tell people is that everybody loses everybody wins that's how you react and come back from those wins and losses that makes you a professional and then you can actually make a living doing something you enjoy and I really enjoy it is what Daniel says so he is right he is playing 100% of what he wants tsays just like he says do you want to be😊 first and then get what you want😊😊 will follow show most people think about the get the money then you can get the things and then you can be who you want to be what he says is Go reverse baguette and says be who you want to be first then get the money get the fame second because without becoming who you want to be you'll never get the money or the fame fame😊
With no punctuations and the stupid emoji's your comment is really hard to comprehend.
In other words be better at winning at a higher percentage than losing. Got it.
Great interview. With Daniel you are likely to get some really good info but you asked a lot of open ended questions that let him riff.
Fedor and bryn was beaten by 2 recreational players known as ossi and vlad at the final four in the triton $150 k buy in even some notable names such greenwood,chidwick and Dan smit was at th FT.
Anyone can win in poker. That's why it's so popular.
@mcfly7 then if the best in the world still looses to some of the worse in the game then how is it a certian income?
Some of the worst in poker?? Bro you’re not a poker player so you just don’t get it. Not to be rude but I don’t think any real poker player can take your question seriously and the fact you can’t spell doesn’t help.
@@brandonnel4687there are certain ways so make money long term if you’re good enough. Putting in high volume in cash games will even out your equity long term.
Tournament poker is far more luck based. In fact, I doubt there are any self made tournament pros that play in mid stakes circuits who don’t have any backers or swap action (purchase a percentage of each other’s tournament buy ins) with other players).
You can be a winning player and have 3-4 losing months in cash poker. You need to have the bankroll to withstand those downswings. However, depending on a few different factors, you can be a winning tournament player and have 3-4 losing YEARS before you get a huge win. It’s just not something most full time pros can do.
Good ggpoker commercial
Thanks for wasting my time with a false video title. There was pretty much no advice on reading people.
I suck at bluffing cause I can't keep a stone cold straight face. I smile too much when people look at me and talk to me digging for information.
What I would like to know…..he says you can make all the right decisions and still lose, on the flip side, how possible is it to make wrong decisions and still win? What’s the % of those 2 instances….if that’s even possible to calculate?
I can't give you an exact figure, but yes, in the short term you can make poor decisions and still win. But making that same set of poor decisions in the long run will result in an overall loss
It’s very difficult to quantify exact numbers because everyone’s skill level varies and different spots happen so often that almost no two hands play out the same way twice.
I’m a semi professional player and I always like to think of it this way: If I get all the money in as an 80% favorite, which is about as good as you can hope for in poker, then I win the hand, I actually got 20% lucky. Does that make sense? Over time, those scenarios will even out as you run into them over and over again. If the other player wins, they got 80% lucky. It’s just the inverse of your probability.
There are some people who got 80% lucky multiple times in a row in gigantic spots like the main event of the World Series, and that equity will never even out. Take Jerry Yang for instance. Not a talented player, but got lucky multiple times and won the main event for millions. The equity will probably never tip the other way for him.
The other day I lost the biggest pot I’ve ever played for $5,000. My opponent had a 1% chance to scoop the entire pot but hit 2 miracle cards. It will take me a long time to run into 100 more scenarios like that, so I doubt I’ll ever recover equity wise. So even if you’re a massive winner, luck actually may play a factor long term.
What's the pros do is what others don't they risk more and build a reputation when they win for others to loan money to them when they lose just like Daniel did😊😊
Wow!!!
❤
Wonder if Daniel has a snooker table in his house in Vegas.
What would you do if people only used AI assistance😊 I think what would happen if you lose the original aspect of the game of the film the risk the entry the darkness that cigarette center of and now it's becoming more of a tournament type environment and everyone tells a long time how long do you have to wait they waste time and 10 million dollars
I like Daniel negreanu a lot and I watch all those videos the only thing I don't like is and I can have this opinion doesn't mean it's valuable but the thing I don't like is he says I'm born and raised in Toronto but he also says when he was 18 he left and went straight to Vegas then many times lost everything he had then he came back after he learned and borrowed and won lot's but for age 18 to age 50 , 32 years of practice and luck 😢but stick it to em later 😮
Prefect clickbait title 😂😂😂 still great interview.
It's all about the money and the Canadians say we're not going to play our Canadian tournaments in other places because it takes away money for our Canada oh Canada.....😊 So basically if you play online tournaments in the USA or regular tournaments in the USA and you're a Canadian resident that means the taxes and certain profits and benefits will only go to the US side not the Canadian side that's how the government works😅
Toby is an actor and played you
That was weird to hear come out of Daniel's mouth. Because that's almost always a reverse psychology move.
@@rpartridge6683 yes, that is almost always a bluff
when I want to see losers, I go to Poker at the lodge.
i'ts a negative-sum profession
Online poker is a scam.....
Y would anyone learn to read anyone….. everyone uses real time assistance now anyways, be it live or online and nothing is being done to police this
dude will literally go on anyone's shitty podcast?
Well, why not?
Do not watch or listen then if not up to your standards
But did he not say informative things? 🤔
Definition of a troll. Say some negative sht yet he didn’t have a problem click’n on it. Miserable life. Then again if you don’t have a troll or two sayn neg sht then you’re prob doin something wrong lol