Who tf said 4.0 is going to be beta keep coping there ain't no fucking way with all the work they still have to do as much as I would love to see it come out as a beta soon there ain't no way😂
What did you know exactly? I know damn sure it wasn’t a planet builder tool lmfao. I actually play star citizen and I can tell you that the players was not expecting this shit 💀
@@TopDrive1 that's becasue you scammed citizens are halfwits that didn't know that scam citizen changed game engines years ago and is now using amazon lumber yard, which is primary an open-source world builder. FFS, you guys are dumb.
Can you imagine getting a contract as a salvage crew to go scrape a downed Idris in the middle of a swamp... at night? Man that would be sick. You and your crew mucking through waste-high swamp water with your torches on, hearing all sorts of creepy sounds, and trying to use your equipment to grab what you can off the downed metal hulk. It would make for a really cinematic experience.
@@Billy-bc8pk As much as I like cinematic experiences, I hope they'll allow us to do a salvage operation like that without constantly getting swarmed by enemies. I'm way more into exploration than combat, and this could finally be the game that delivers on that front (if it ever delivers of course).
I finally realized what activates my uncanny valley about ferns in videogames. All the fronds are perfect green instead of the ones that receive less water/light turning a brownish red. For some reason the ferns in the Jungle demo were much better than the ferns in the Alpine demo.
Stop using uncanny valley interchangeably with weird, uncomfortable or unrealistic. Uncanny valley can not be applied to things not human-like and even if so, uncanny valley means something looks so close to a real human it triggers a weird sensation where you know it is fake but it's so close to reality your brain almost cannot differentiate.. Not because you think the ferns don't look right.
In my biome, the ferns are ALL green until fall sets in. I have a large area with a sea of ferns at the back of my property. Nothing but green in spring and summer. Perhaps the difference is between temperate zones and tropical zones. Plants all start off about the same age as they sprout in spring, in temperate zones. In tropical zones, plants are continuously growing and so the older leaves stick around and show their distress. So I'd say CIG has it right.
@@GUNNER67akaKelt Eh. Go out in the woods in the Pacific Northwest and you'll see plenty of ferns with curled brown edges mixed in with normal. It's more an issue of moisture and sunlight.
scam. this is already existed since years at last 5 years and the maker sold licences to game developers. Nothing new. But im not suprised this scam is just lie to its fans so long time ago...
scam. this is already existed since years at last 5 years and the maker sold licences to game developers. Nothing new. But im not suprised this scam is just lie to its fans so long time ago...
@@xiuhtezcatl8161 it's not scam if it's on the game, also, they have all the right to sell the tech before using it on the game, people need to start reading the tiny texts on online terms of service lol
very cool, though I can't help but wonder why Earth plants are every where else in the universe, like Redwoods and Mangroves, rather than things inspired by them.
These planets are usually terraformed by the UEE in universe, as alien biology is not compatible with humans most of the time. It’s called “life seeding” and it’s a concept inside the lore. Humanity found the most suitable plants and animals from the multiple early planets they conquered and created a template of sorts to terraform suitable worlds into. Microtech’s global ice age is actually because of such a terraforming project going horribly wrong. This is also why space cows and copions are everywhere.
Seriously? They dont even bother giving tou enough time in animation to escape the self destruct feauture in certain ships. They are laughing at anyone who pledged any amount
scam. this is already existed since years at last 5 years and the maker sold licences to game developers. Nothing new. But im not suprised this scam is just lie to its fans so long time ago...
scam. this is already existed since years at last 5 years and the maker sold licences to game developers. Nothing new. But im not suprised this scam is just lie to its fans so long time ago...
that's what i'm thingking too. if arccorp has this cyberpunk level of detail cities and goes more floors under with story and quests, new players could spend hundreds of hours there before knowing you could travel into other planets and even other star systems.
I am 37. I am waiting since 27 to see that game. I hope I see it before I am 50.. the day this game is released .. I will need to quit work just to play that 24h
Everybody complaining about this taking long. What do you expect? They're doing something revolutionary. This will be the game. Everybody is wanted since the beginning of games being made.. chill out
Yea there’s something really crazy in software development. It’s called iteration. Sure they could just stay in 2016 or they could continue to improve their planet generation further and further. They’ve already iterated on the original planet tech up to v4. This is just v5 with further tech to improve the planet generation.
@@natewagstaff2516 but when they promise that with iteration #4 they could fulfill certain aspects and they did not achieve why should they do it with iteration #5? Especially when #5 makes things nicer (quality) but does not ramp up quantity? Ok, there should always be improvements… but we are talking about 8 years minimum now between #4 and #5. A lot time to realize that #4 was not the true fulfillment- right? At the same time they continued to make promises based on #4. Something does not work within their project control processes or reporting. One clue could be CR‘s infamous micromanagement .
@19iason19 They were already working on the V5 when you heard the promises. They continue to improve their tools constantly. And it has nothing to do with Chris micromanagement. It's how software dev works, even more for something as complexe as creating entire planets, moons with fidelity and quantity
Its very pretty but how long will this take to reproduce, how long did it take to make and is this really the most important thing to be focusing on? I dont really think of orchids when hyping myself up for a game of space combat ya know?
They finished jungle biomes and swamp biomes several months ago and they are now part of Planet Tech V5, which is being rolled into Genesis. We will see them whenever the next solar system featuring a jungle biome is presented (I doubt they will update Microtech or Hurston to include them). So in terms of when we will see this in the PU? Likely whenever Terra arrives, unless they decide to add a jungle biome to one of the Pyro planets.
@@operator9858 Bro be realistic 5 systems is plenty at launch. Considering your going to be not just on planets but moons, going to asteroid belts, space stations etc. They have given us false expectations, so I understand your frustration. Played plenty of space games and the detail doesn't come close to what star citizen is trying to achieve. I'm patient and with their big reveals in the last week. I'm confident they'll keep pumping out updates for the next 5 to 10 years. I'm young so I can wait. 😅
@@vocnisicle you ever play eve? what happens when the biggest alliances in the game decides to go to war or take something over? and 5 systems will be the equivalent of trying to fight in a phone booth.
@@operator9858 We were promised 100 systems but you only could fly around in a tiny amount of space and then you would go near to a 'planet' and a loading screen would come up with a prerendered cutscene of you landing. And then you would get teleported on the planet with a tiny landing zone to walk around. And you could only load into like 2-5 tiny landing areas per planet (and some would not even have any landing area). Now you get millions of km² per planet to fully fly around with multiple PoI, story arcs and mission givers and ways to do exploration, hunting, mining, salvaging, fps mission, base building etc etc etc. This is far and beyond anything that was originally planned for the game and it is far better that way. If you want 100+ boring ass planets with tiny landingzones and cutscenes you still can play Starfield though.
@@GeorgyOkopianthis was not made in unreal engine. Also, the teams working on genesis are not the same teams working on the systems IE netcode To the bugs mentioned above
@@natewagstaff2516 no, but I like how these losers feed shit to "fans". The CIG team physically and technically cannot create such videos. Most likely they were created by some separately recruited studio on unreal engine
Well thank God the game keeps evolving and isn't stuck in like 2012, like 99% of AAA games backed by multi billion (or trillion) corporations are nowadays
@@gian.4388 This right here is the reason I'm sticking with Star citizen. You can't rush greatness. Patience is a virtue being so young, lets hope it doesn't crash and burn in the next 10 years.
Seriously look at games like Star Wars Outlaws and tell me it was worth waiting for these AAA titles? I get more enjoyment of a buggy alpha tech demo and a bunch of SC events and vids each year than of most AAA open word games that were relased in the past 7+ years.
@@MyN0N4M3 It's not a question of quality anymore with SC it's now about the bottom line, and the funding pipeline, that will dictate the product we see, if we see it.
They say Earth will be the last planet they ever do. So out of the 96 solar systems left to tackle, there is a long ways away for Earth. The reason they mentioned this is becaus they say when you get to Earth in Star Citizen they want people to be able to easily recognise appropriate landmarks.
@@Billy-bc8pk if that’s the case I can’t wait ! Because with release of Microsoft flight simulator 2024 which will feature entire earth with high details I don’t see why can’t RSI do for Star citizen especially with technology they have introduced at this citizen con :)
I really wish Bethesda did a partnership with Star Citizen when making starfield, Bethesda got the tech and a bit of training in exchange for a few kickbacks from sales.
@@jacksonbarkerthebluehairedfox ahhhhh and this may be a stretch but 1 there could be a couple ships with a high enough durability for it and 2 im hoping there loke permanent systems that have to be mapped out and without it you could be fucked lol
with the dynamic weather systems could come freaking hurricanes and tropical storms. Imagine traveling to a planet and seeing a rotating hurricane on the surface. You get closer to have a look and before you know it, you're in the middle of a massive storm, all in one seamless go.
It seems like they want to use this on older planets as well. Like I would expect that they will redo the biomes on Microtech for example, as they already showed off the new forest density on Microtech in that example. After that I would guess all these new biomes like Swamps only make sense on Terra itself, as the other planets are not supposed to have such biomes according to the lore. That means it could take another 2-4 years, since we first get Pyro next year, then probably 1 year later or in the same year Nyx (as it is a small system and most interior was already finished) and then we would get Castra (which might come with some redwood biome, idk) and then in 3-4 or more years I would expect Terra (as it has a vast city and multiple PoIs and will be one of the more difficult planets/systems to create.
It’s too bad they keep adding mechanics to the game, at some point it’s just going to be so overly complex most casual players will never play the game.
I don't and it's not what I backed. Hell SC the MMO wasn't what was originally pitched on the kick starter, SQ42 was. SC is a spin off of SQ42. I have no desire to play a MMO with Perma Death and most don't either. I want to play a new Wing Commander game not some damn MMO thats going to have Perma Death and issues with Network Bandwidth. Keep that nonsense to yourself.
@@tuclance What stats? The one on RSI include funding for everything and doesn't say what people are pleding for. You need a reality check cause obviously you're the one living in a bubble.
garbage . they once again are wasting time with new stuff to sucker people in vs finishing the huge back log of ships and other stuff like better servers and so and now push 42 out two more years give me a break!!
They've literally been doing huge server tests recently and server meshing will be online by the end of the year with 4.0. We have also known for years that planet tech v5 was in the works, this wasn't something they decided on last week. If they released Sq42 early and it was a buggy mess you'd be complaining that they should have waited and worked on the game more. You're that kind of person who just wants to be angry at something.
How long has gta 6 been in development? Just curious. Also compare what gta has, and compare was star citizen has. Gta 6 10 years, still in developement building 1 city, improved technologies created from their own engine that was created in 2006 called RAGE (gta 6 is using rage version 9 ) this is a huge company with way more money than CIG, and still hasnt release a game that only has 1 city in it. Star citizen and sqaudron 42 2 games being created at the same time since 2012 Star citizen currently has 4 planets with 4 major cities. A handfull of moons, space stations.. invented brand new technologies never been created before, jump away from cryo engine 3 becuase of limitations, and had no choice but to create a brand new engine. Squadron 42 is a single player with a fully written campaign and story line. Lets not forget everything that star citizen has, will also be in the single player game as well. Thats not even half of whats been done. But to still be upset about this game not being out with everything that you just seen is ridiculous, or you really dont understand anything that goes on in the development world.
Bruh you clearly need a rain check on the reality of games. This game if they can deliver will be one of the best MMOs. The tiny details matter, and it is nothing short of amazing if they can achieve it. Red Dead Redemption 2 comes to mind or The Last Of Us. No other game comnes close to what they are trying to achieve at such large scale. Why the negativity though, look on the bright side of life, we get this beautifully crafted world that will be in active development for years to come(hopefully). With hours of entertainment. Your imagination is the limit. Enjoy it while it lasts, we have one life.
They could, but there's no reason why they should. What does 100% scale planets do for gameplay aside from making the flight out of atmosphere take four hours? What does it accomplish that the current scale does not?
so stuff that unreal has for years. At least hope it will be less cpu bounded after those how many yers of dev? 15? Also why the vegetaion looks like on earth? Did you just bought those assets and scatter them across? :D what a joke omg
First off this is white box. Second of all they specifically stated this is only possible due to the offloading of this processing to the gpu. They explain in the lore than terraformed planets are terraformed using earth plants. But I’m sure they’ll add more alien plants in the future. Like the ones you see in pyro.
Fun fact, Unreal Engine 5 is in no way capable of doing any of this at scale. UE5 is an overhyped mess of an engine which has yet to produce a stable, good looking game. Games that use it also end up having a fake plastic look to them 90 percent of the time. It's a blight on the gaming industry.
@@NotGemini i believe so. Clarisse for example is old ass shit engine and works purly with instances where you can have milions of objects in scene.. This stuff just isnt new. And dont forget what do you protect. Developer who promises shit ton of things... Didnt fullfill it and took money changed terms so they will not give back money... Also this game worked on old ass cry engine for decade still cpu bonded. Badly optimized shit.
Wow, pushing logs in the water and water has waves when walking in it, grass, ferns and water lilies bend... My Skyrim can do that since forever. That's not impressive at all, it's baseline for modern good looking games since years now. And Skyrim is not that beautiful for modern standards even with the top ENB preset, 8K parallax textures + complex LOD generation.
@@natewagstaff2516 I'm pointing out the crowd going "WOOH!!!" for moving a log on the water. That's not revolutionary at all, it's an overreaction. Even a very old Havoc physics engine can do that the same. And no matter if Star Citizen has 1/6 scale planets or not (that doesn't matter for that particular effect or feature). Even Star Citizen uses little tricks to reduce the load thankfully since it's not running well everywhere, and forests will definitely make it run just as bad as in cities. Just watch it. That will be very complicated without a technology similar to Nanite. Parallax decals are one thing, filling a scene with many props on top of realistic lighting with path or ray tracing, shadows and AO, effects, volumetric particles, 16K texture everything (ships have 4K textures, some other areas of SC anything between 4K, 8K or 16K alternatively). And the game is already running pretty bad without a Lumen or Ray tracing tech. Not everything SC does is more advanced than others.
@@GUNNER67akaKelt That's not a matter of scale everywhere. A UE5 engine could run their swamp environment way better with the same texture sizes (or everything at a default 8K parallax with Nanite because SC uses a mix of 4K, 8K and 16K here and there) and basically the entire planet. Imo 16K textures are overkill even for 4K display res and the engine is dying even for the SQ42 demo that's uploaded and ironed out compared to the CitizenCon live version. That's a big problem. People want to think that Star Engine is the best of the best but they barely implement features we have seen years ago actually. Besides it's not about having the best engine: I don't care if a game is UE5 and wel used, I also want a good game. There was Crysis which was awesome back in the days, then there was Crysis 2, and finally Crysis 3. And hum... Well, the latter two were very beautiful too, don't get me wrong, but were crappy games too.
@@RonJeremy514 My point being, Unreal Engine 5 is for 'small' maps (several kilometers). Nobody is saying UE5 isn't beautiful and can do all these things already, but show me it making a planet the size of mars or even the moon... AND then be able to fly seamlessly from that planet to 9 others of similar sizes and over a dozen moons, also huge, with that same fidelity. It simply can't. At this point in time, anyway. If you can link me a video of it doing so, I'll retract this statement.
Show me Unreal 5 doing an entire planet. Now show me Unreal 5 doing multiple planets and moons (actual huge ones, not like those small ones in NMS) all without loading screens. Can it do that?
scam. this is already existed since years at last 5 years and the maker sold licences to game developers. Nothing new. But im not suprised this scam is just lie to its fans so long time ago...
@@natewagstaff2516 they used unreal to create and show a beautiful video clip. you have to feed stupid fans with shit and at least promise something. and how could you do it? right. show a beautiful video created with the help of other services and programs. because the engine on which the "game" is created, sorry, not a game, but a Techno-demo, will not allow you to create such beautiful videos🤗
I knew it! My grandchildren will see beta launch
Beta is 4.0, lol. Soon
Who tf said 4.0 is going to be beta keep coping there ain't no fucking way with all the work they still have to do as much as I would love to see it come out as a beta soon there ain't no way😂
You’re going to have grandchildren in 2 years? Gaming grandpas do exist
What did you know exactly? I know damn sure it wasn’t a planet builder tool lmfao. I actually play star citizen and I can tell you that the players was not expecting this shit 💀
@@TopDrive1 that's becasue you scammed citizens are halfwits that didn't know that scam citizen changed game engines years ago and is now using amazon lumber yard, which is primary an open-source world builder. FFS, you guys are dumb.
All the Return of the Jedi fans when the speeders went through the Redwoods
And that "X-Wing" stranded in that swamp....is clearly Empire strikes back.^^
@@NeoSephirothValthey seem to be leaning into the « unoriginal unfinished unplayable tech demo » market. Unprecedented
me and the game that you could do it with
Man imagine jungles full of beasts but also lootable caves and wreck ships. That would be so cool. Specially at night!
I'm picturing wrecks handing from thick roots/vines with sketchy traversal paths to rare loot crates inside
Can you imagine getting a contract as a salvage crew to go scrape a downed Idris in the middle of a swamp... at night? Man that would be sick. You and your crew mucking through waste-high swamp water with your torches on, hearing all sorts of creepy sounds, and trying to use your equipment to grab what you can off the downed metal hulk. It would make for a really cinematic experience.
@@Billy-bc8pk As much as I like cinematic experiences, I hope they'll allow us to do a salvage operation like that without constantly getting swarmed by enemies. I'm way more into exploration than combat, and this could finally be the game that delivers on that front (if it ever delivers of course).
I finally realized what activates my uncanny valley about ferns in videogames. All the fronds are perfect green instead of the ones that receive less water/light turning a brownish red. For some reason the ferns in the Jungle demo were much better than the ferns in the Alpine demo.
Could also just be the shadows. The jungle one looked good probably because it was in a very small area and not yet optimized.
Stop using uncanny valley interchangeably with weird, uncomfortable or unrealistic. Uncanny valley can not be applied to things not human-like and even if so, uncanny valley means something looks so close to a real human it triggers a weird sensation where you know it is fake but it's so close to reality your brain almost cannot differentiate.. Not because you think the ferns don't look right.
Its their movement as well as colour. Hopefully AI can solve complex foliage movement properly soon.
In my biome, the ferns are ALL green until fall sets in. I have a large area with a sea of ferns at the back of my property. Nothing but green in spring and summer. Perhaps the difference is between temperate zones and tropical zones. Plants all start off about the same age as they sprout in spring, in temperate zones. In tropical zones, plants are continuously growing and so the older leaves stick around and show their distress. So I'd say CIG has it right.
@@GUNNER67akaKelt Eh. Go out in the woods in the Pacific Northwest and you'll see plenty of ferns with curled brown edges mixed in with normal. It's more an issue of moisture and sunlight.
The year 2136 is going to be a great year for game releases 🎉
scam. this is already existed since years at last 5 years and the maker sold licences to game developers. Nothing new. But im not suprised this scam is just lie to its fans so long time ago...
Actually plan to write a Sci-Fi Novel Book and sometimes I fly around in Star Citzien to get inspiration.
why not just base it off SC but with your own character
@@aronhayse9895 it because I am a Fan of Stargate/Star Trek. But your Idea isn't bad, I will think about it.
@@aronhayse9895wouldn’t have as much soul as if the dude creates his own world. He wants it to be a novel, not a fan fiction.
Presenter: *coughs*
Everyone: *intensely claps and cheers*
tbf they only clapped at impressive stuff
@@Luizguilherme-iz9yl stuff they wont get to play ever
@@ruok-l5t idk man, star citizen has taken a ridiculous amount of time, but they have made an insanely impressive amount of stuff
scammed citizens. It's literally a cult of idiots.
@@Luizguilherme-iz9yl nothing about this low-tier tech demo, is "impressive", lmfao.
This looks stunning. Our kids will enjoy this. I’m 23 😂.
That is just jaw dropping ❤
utill you actually play their shitty tech demo, lmfao. You'll uninstall, like the rest of the scammed citizens
scam. this is already existed since years at last 5 years and the maker sold licences to game developers. Nothing new. But im not suprised this scam is just lie to its fans so long time ago...
@@xiuhtezcatl8161 wake up dude 😂
@@xiuhtezcatl8161 it's not scam if it's on the game, also, they have all the right to sell the tech before using it on the game, people need to start reading the tiny texts on online terms of service lol
very cool, though I can't help but wonder why Earth plants are every where else in the universe, like Redwoods and Mangroves, rather than things inspired by them.
These planets are usually terraformed by the UEE in universe, as alien biology is not compatible with humans most of the time. It’s called “life seeding” and it’s a concept inside the lore. Humanity found the most suitable plants and animals from the multiple early planets they conquered and created a template of sorts to terraform suitable worlds into.
Microtech’s global ice age is actually because of such a terraforming project going horribly wrong. This is also why space cows and copions are everywhere.
Because they are terraformed worlds so UEE seed them with plants/animals
Seriously? They dont even bother giving tou enough time in animation to escape the self destruct feauture in certain ships. They are laughing at anyone who pledged any amount
because its a video game
@@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n take your meds
Jungle and swamp and redwood biomes looked sick! ..and they finally fixed tiling of mountains and textures.. we're just getting started too baby!
scam. this is already existed since years at last 5 years and the maker sold licences to game developers. Nothing new. But im not suprised this scam is just lie to its fans so long time ago...
U know hearing Frooonch mon in a Accooont its A hit !!
Imagine if every planet has a single story telling, like Witcher 3, Skyrim, Doom, Alien marines, red dead redemption 2, gta 5 etc etc...
scam. this is already existed since years at last 5 years and the maker sold licences to game developers. Nothing new. But im not suprised this scam is just lie to its fans so long time ago...
that's what i'm thingking too. if arccorp has this cyberpunk level of detail cities and goes more floors under with story and quests, new players could spend hundreds of hours there before knowing you could travel into other planets and even other star systems.
My laptop will turn into a geothermal source when it starts storming in the woods😂
I mean at least the immersion is there when you walk into a hot desert and your PC does the same 😂
Shrek can finally have his swamp back now....
..in 2142...in beta..
I am 37. I am waiting since 27 to see that game. I hope I see it before I am 50.. the day this game is released .. I will need to quit work just to play that 24h
*The most beautiful alpha test ever conceived!*
Clearly, this is all in a build somewhere... Give us! :P
Everybody complaining about this taking long. What do you expect? They're doing something revolutionary. This will be the game. Everybody is wanted since the beginning of games being made.. chill out
Please help me? At which citcon did they show the tools which should help them to develop planets in a very quick way? 2016 i think…
Yea there’s something really crazy in software development. It’s called iteration. Sure they could just stay in 2016 or they could continue to improve their planet generation further and further. They’ve already iterated on the original planet tech up to v4. This is just v5 with further tech to improve the planet generation.
@@natewagstaff2516 but when they promise that with iteration #4 they could fulfill certain aspects and they did not achieve why should they do it with iteration #5? Especially when #5 makes things nicer (quality) but does not ramp up quantity?
Ok, there should always be improvements… but we are talking about 8 years minimum now between #4 and #5. A lot time to realize that #4 was not the true fulfillment- right? At the same time they continued to make promises based on #4. Something does not work within their project control processes or reporting. One clue could be CR‘s infamous micromanagement .
@19iason19
They were already working on the V5 when you heard the promises. They continue to improve their tools constantly.
And it has nothing to do with Chris micromanagement. It's how software dev works, even more for something as complexe as creating entire planets, moons with fidelity and quantity
@@Martin-sx4bx for 8 years?
@@19iason19
Constantly
future of gaming
Its very pretty but how long will this take to reproduce, how long did it take to make and is this really the most important thing to be focusing on?
I dont really think of orchids when hyping myself up for a game of space combat ya know?
They finished jungle biomes and swamp biomes several months ago and they are now part of Planet Tech V5, which is being rolled into Genesis. We will see them whenever the next solar system featuring a jungle biome is presented (I doubt they will update Microtech or Hurston to include them). So in terms of when we will see this in the PU? Likely whenever Terra arrives, unless they decide to add a jungle biome to one of the Pyro planets.
@@Billy-bc8pk we were originally promised 100 systems but are only getting 5 at launch. They need to step it up...
@@operator9858 Bro be realistic 5 systems is plenty at launch. Considering your going to be not just on planets but moons, going to asteroid belts, space stations etc. They have given us false expectations, so I understand your frustration. Played plenty of space games and the detail doesn't come close to what star citizen is trying to achieve. I'm patient and with their big reveals in the last week. I'm confident they'll keep pumping out updates for the next 5 to 10 years. I'm young so I can wait. 😅
@@vocnisicle you ever play eve? what happens when the biggest alliances in the game decides to go to war or take something over? and 5 systems will be the equivalent of trying to fight in a phone booth.
@@operator9858 We were promised 100 systems but you only could fly around in a tiny amount of space and then you would go near to a 'planet' and a loading screen would come up with a prerendered cutscene of you landing.
And then you would get teleported on the planet with a tiny landing zone to walk around.
And you could only load into like 2-5 tiny landing areas per planet (and some would not even have any landing area).
Now you get millions of km² per planet to fully fly around with multiple PoI, story arcs and mission givers and ways to do exploration, hunting, mining, salvaging, fps mission, base building etc etc etc.
This is far and beyond anything that was originally planned for the game and it is far better that way.
If you want 100+ boring ass planets with tiny landingzones and cutscenes you still can play Starfield though.
Any day now! I'm holding my breath
You’re drying of asphyxiation and old age then. 😂
@@edcenatus9825 🤣
who was breathing in the mic the whole video?
I assume that all the plants will be made of steel as before...
that's awesome now can they fix it where I don't fall thru the space station and die or my ship blows up and I get a cs3 for absolutely no reason 😂
No dude, you're wrong. They'll continue to draw beautiful videos on the unreal engine while you'll be falling into textures😂
@@GeorgyOkopianman are you like part of the marketing team for unreal engine?
@@GeorgyOkopian Beautiful textures
@@GeorgyOkopianthis was not made in unreal engine.
Also, the teams working on genesis are not the same teams working on the systems IE netcode To the bugs mentioned above
@@natewagstaff2516 no, but I like how these losers feed shit to "fans". The CIG team physically and technically cannot create such videos. Most likely they were created by some separately recruited studio on unreal engine
This planet tech on your PC is two years into the future, and upon that day arriving, another citizen-con will proclaim the future is not today.
Well thank God the game keeps evolving and isn't stuck in like 2012, like 99% of AAA games backed by multi billion (or trillion) corporations are nowadays
@@gian.4388It's not the evolving that concerns me; it's the cost of maintaining nothingness through Jpegs.
@@gian.4388 This right here is the reason I'm sticking with Star citizen. You can't rush greatness. Patience is a virtue being so young, lets hope it doesn't crash and burn in the next 10 years.
Seriously look at games like Star Wars Outlaws and tell me it was worth waiting for these AAA titles?
I get more enjoyment of a buggy alpha tech demo and a bunch of SC events and vids each year than of most AAA open word games that were relased in the past 7+ years.
@@MyN0N4M3 It's not a question of quality anymore with SC it's now about the bottom line, and the funding pipeline, that will dictate the product we see, if we see it.
Of course they needed to make a forest to have a speeder bike chase in...
Yeey, they made a scattering system. What a "revolution." Now add some life, interaction and gameplay?
I wish we are able to explore Earth like this in Star Citizen onsce released...
Someday, someday. Don't be surprised if Earth is an ecumenopolis like Arccorp, though.
They say Earth will be the last planet they ever do. So out of the 96 solar systems left to tackle, there is a long ways away for Earth. The reason they mentioned this is becaus they say when you get to Earth in Star Citizen they want people to be able to easily recognise appropriate landmarks.
@@Billy-bc8pk if that’s the case I can’t wait ! Because with release of Microsoft flight simulator 2024 which will feature entire earth with high details I don’t see why can’t RSI do for Star citizen especially with technology they have introduced at this citizen con :)
I can't wait to live in a swamp with my donkey and my cat
Why do they put so many stones on the ground?
🥵☠️🧑🦽My pc when this update drops
Same. 😓😓
Now optimize it so that not only 10% of the world will be able to play it
10% is almost 900 million people 🤦
Dude, I'm playing it on a 7 year old computer... or is it 8 yo now?
I really wish Bethesda did a partnership with Star Citizen when making starfield, Bethesda got the tech and a bit of training in exchange for a few kickbacks from sales.
on espère que ça sera pas un no man sky bis
if you can do it, do it and not in one of your conferences to sell ships
stoppppppppppppp can i be a storm chaser and collect storm data on planets my dream
Exactlyyyy. Space storm chasing!
They showed there will be wind physics too, so what if they amped it up and included freakin' tornadoes?
@@jacksonbarkerthebluehairedfox ahhhhh and this may be a stretch but 1 there could be a couple ships with a high enough durability for it and 2 im hoping there loke permanent systems that have to be mapped out and without it you could be fucked lol
@@thatssocloudyazia4871 My strecth........ I want volcanoes. Be sick to find a planet covered in these.
with the dynamic weather systems could come freaking hurricanes and tropical storms. Imagine traveling to a planet and seeing a rotating hurricane on the surface. You get closer to have a look and before you know it, you're in the middle of a massive storm, all in one seamless go.
When will the first planet use this? Did they say?
prolly sooner than anything its the visual guys their timeline is always on time
It seems like they want to use this on older planets as well.
Like I would expect that they will redo the biomes on Microtech for example, as they already showed off the new forest density on Microtech in that example.
After that I would guess all these new biomes like Swamps only make sense on Terra itself, as the other planets are not supposed to have such biomes according to the lore.
That means it could take another 2-4 years, since we first get Pyro next year, then probably 1 year later or in the same year Nyx (as it is a small system and most interior was already finished) and then we would get Castra (which might come with some redwood biome, idk) and then in 3-4 or more years I would expect Terra (as it has a vast city and multiple PoIs and will be one of the more difficult planets/systems to create.
Oh yeah… the lots of technology, but no helmet heating and screen drying
Sure hope they make trees destructible or something. Driving in a ground vehicle is already pain. With added density I feel it will be unbearable.
The terrain still flat, that's only tree desing.
that was some very low fps demo roll
Video démo ... wait to see in real before to said something
Very cool. But space is still green, right?
It’s too bad they keep adding mechanics to the game, at some point it’s just going to be so overly complex most casual players will never play the game.
its a space sim it says on its genre
Lmao all those wildlife sounds in the jungle and a single bird flys by
@@GutsGaming having been alot in irl jungles i say this is legit you hear alot of shit u never see 🤣🤣 but they watch your every step!
Just let the single player game fade away and put all manpower on SC its what everyone wants!
I don't and it's not what I backed. Hell SC the MMO wasn't what was originally pitched on the kick starter, SQ42 was. SC is a spin off of SQ42. I have no desire to play a MMO with Perma Death and most don't either. I want to play a new Wing Commander game not some damn MMO thats going to have Perma Death and issues with Network Bandwidth. Keep that nonsense to yourself.
@@Drekko_Okami well...the stats is there🤣 98% of all income is from SC. So enjoy your lonely little bubble😆
@@tuclance What stats? The one on RSI include funding for everything and doesn't say what people are pleding for. You need a reality check cause obviously you're the one living in a bubble.
@@Drekko_Okami 🤣
@@tuclanceyour a cringe lord
Propaganda to bring more money to the sinkhole.
Yeah, its a scam! They are making all this with smoke and mirrors! The real money is in a bahama bank account!
Haters coping hard.
garbage . they once again are wasting time with new stuff to sucker people in vs finishing the huge back log of ships and other stuff like better servers and so and now push 42 out two more years give me a break!!
They've literally been doing huge server tests recently and server meshing will be online by the end of the year with 4.0.
We have also known for years that planet tech v5 was in the works, this wasn't something they decided on last week.
If they released Sq42 early and it was a buggy mess you'd be complaining that they should have waited and worked on the game more.
You're that kind of person who just wants to be angry at something.
How long has gta 6 been in development? Just curious. Also compare what gta has, and compare was star citizen has.
Gta 6 10 years, still in developement building 1 city, improved technologies created from their own engine that was created in 2006 called RAGE (gta 6 is using rage version 9 ) this is a huge company with way more money than CIG, and still hasnt release a game that only has 1 city in it.
Star citizen and sqaudron 42
2 games being created at the same time since 2012
Star citizen currently has 4 planets with 4 major cities. A handfull of moons, space stations.. invented brand new technologies never been created before, jump away from cryo engine 3 becuase of limitations, and had no choice but to create a brand new engine.
Squadron 42 is a single player with a fully written campaign and story line. Lets not forget everything that star citizen has, will also be in the single player game as well.
Thats not even half of whats been done.
But to still be upset about this game not being out with everything that you just seen is ridiculous, or you really dont understand anything that goes on in the development world.
Why? Like how does this create fun gameplay?
Storms push you to use ground vehicles. Good vistas need for cool players ground bases like in other sandboxes. Whats wrong?
Bruh you clearly need a rain check on the reality of games. This game if they can deliver will be one of the best MMOs. The tiny details matter, and it is nothing short of amazing if they can achieve it. Red Dead Redemption 2 comes to mind or The Last Of Us. No other game comnes close to what they are trying to achieve at such large scale. Why the negativity though, look on the bright side of life, we get this beautifully crafted world that will be in active development for years to come(hopefully). With hours of entertainment. Your imagination is the limit. Enjoy it while it lasts, we have one life.
ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM: they're still not talking about full-scale planets... moons 14%, planets 10%, distances 10%...
They could, but there's no reason why they should. What does 100% scale planets do for gameplay aside from making the flight out of atmosphere take four hours? What does it accomplish that the current scale does not?
so stuff that unreal has for years. At least hope it will be less cpu bounded after those how many yers of dev? 15? Also why the vegetaion looks like on earth? Did you just bought those assets and scatter them across? :D what a joke omg
First off this is white box. Second of all they specifically stated this is only possible due to the offloading of this processing to the gpu. They explain in the lore than terraformed planets are terraformed using earth plants. But I’m sure they’ll add more alien plants in the future. Like the ones you see in pyro.
Fun fact, Unreal Engine 5 is in no way capable of doing any of this at scale.
UE5 is an overhyped mess of an engine which has yet to produce a stable, good looking game. Games that use it also end up having a fake plastic look to them 90 percent of the time. It's a blight on the gaming industry.
@@thumpertron by using instances and nanite you can achieve large scale scene.
You can create a solar system with unreal engine with no loading screens in a MMO ?
@@NotGemini i believe so. Clarisse for example is old ass shit engine and works purly with instances where you can have milions of objects in scene.. This stuff just isnt new. And dont forget what do you protect. Developer who promises shit ton of things... Didnt fullfill it and took money changed terms so they will not give back money... Also this game worked on old ass cry engine for decade still cpu bonded. Badly optimized shit.
Typical. Landscapes with no gameplay, SC rules all.
This was a presentation literally only about planet tech.
@thumpertron dont waste your time explaining...its pointless.
Bro criticizing 20 mins over 10h of presentations yet complains there's no gameplay...
This is one small portion of the Citizencon presentation.
Wow, pushing logs in the water and water has waves when walking in it, grass, ferns and water lilies bend... My Skyrim can do that since forever. That's not impressive at all, it's baseline for modern good looking games since years now. And Skyrim is not that beautiful for modern standards even with the top ENB preset, 8K parallax textures + complex LOD generation.
And Skyrim was built by a large team of artists and is a minuscule size compared to an entire planet. Let alone a whole system.
@@natewagstaff2516 I'm pointing out the crowd going "WOOH!!!" for moving a log on the water. That's not revolutionary at all, it's an overreaction. Even a very old Havoc physics engine can do that the same. And no matter if Star Citizen has 1/6 scale planets or not (that doesn't matter for that particular effect or feature). Even Star Citizen uses little tricks to reduce the load thankfully since it's not running well everywhere, and forests will definitely make it run just as bad as in cities. Just watch it. That will be very complicated without a technology similar to Nanite. Parallax decals are one thing, filling a scene with many props on top of realistic lighting with path or ray tracing, shadows and AO, effects, volumetric particles, 16K texture everything (ships have 4K textures, some other areas of SC anything between 4K, 8K or 16K alternatively).
And the game is already running pretty bad without a Lumen or Ray tracing tech. Not everything SC does is more advanced than others.
No, nothing really new here. The diffence is the SCALE. The entirety of Skyrim would fit in a large crater on ONE of SC's planets.
@@GUNNER67akaKelt That's not a matter of scale everywhere. A UE5 engine could run their swamp environment way better with the same texture sizes (or everything at a default 8K parallax with Nanite because SC uses a mix of 4K, 8K and 16K here and there) and basically the entire planet. Imo 16K textures are overkill even for 4K display res and the engine is dying even for the SQ42 demo that's uploaded and ironed out compared to the CitizenCon live version. That's a big problem. People want to think that Star Engine is the best of the best but they barely implement features we have seen years ago actually.
Besides it's not about having the best engine: I don't care if a game is UE5 and wel used, I also want a good game. There was Crysis which was awesome back in the days, then there was Crysis 2, and finally Crysis 3. And hum... Well, the latter two were very beautiful too, don't get me wrong, but were crappy games too.
@@RonJeremy514 My point being, Unreal Engine 5 is for 'small' maps (several kilometers). Nobody is saying UE5 isn't beautiful and can do all these things already, but show me it making a planet the size of mars or even the moon... AND then be able to fly seamlessly from that planet to 9 others of similar sizes and over a dozen moons, also huge, with that same fidelity. It simply can't. At this point in time, anyway. If you can link me a video of it doing so, I'll retract this statement.
This was so lame
And what would you like instead? A soccer game, I bet!
@@captainmurk3745 🤣
Unreal 5 is better and already here
unreal doesn't support planetary tech tools
is not lol,
Unreal 5 is great, but you're limited to the things the engine were intended to. For some things you need a custom engine
@@rabbit9577 UE5 its good to use only for tech demos, not Games bro, you can see ,,limits'' by engine in every game on UE
Show me Unreal 5 doing an entire planet. Now show me Unreal 5 doing multiple planets and moons (actual huge ones, not like those small ones in NMS) all without loading screens. Can it do that?
scam. this is already existed since years at last 5 years and the maker sold licences to game developers. Nothing new. But im not suprised this scam is just lie to its fans so long time ago...
the presentation is 100% made on unreal engine. but fans will eat shit and believe in genesis 😂
Yea it’s worth it having your devs develop things on unreal engine just for a demo you are a genius.
🤡
Genesis isn't an engine, it's a tool set for Star Engine to develop physics based environment plus UE5 can't handle planetary scale XD
@@natewagstaff2516 they used unreal to create and show a beautiful video clip. you have to feed stupid fans with shit and at least promise something. and how could you do it? right. show a beautiful video created with the help of other services and programs. because the engine on which the "game" is created, sorry, not a game, but a Techno-demo, will not allow you to create such beautiful videos🤗