T-15 'Armata' Heavy Infantry Fighting Vehicle | RUSSIAN ADVANCED TROOP CARRIER
Вставка
- Опубліковано 31 сер 2022
- Download Fishing Clash for FREE here fishingclash.link/Matsimus and use my code MATSIMUS to get $20 worth of gifts for new players
With my gift code you’ll get a 3-star rod, 1 mythical lure (dolphinfish), 50 luck power-ups and 30 weight power-ups to help you catch bigger fish.
Steel Beasts pro Footage: check out his channel!
/ smartwargames
The Armata is a new Russian heavy Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV). It is also referred as the T-15. Its development commenced in 2011. This heavy IFV was developed as a part of armored vehicle family. It is based on the same platform as the Armata main battle tank. First mock-up or prototype was completed in 2013. During the same year it was revealed to Russian military officials. This heavy IFV was first publicly revealed in 2015.
The T-15 Armata heavy IFV has an unusual layout with a front-mounted engine. Interestingly the Armata tank has a rear powerpack arrangement. It became an issue for designers in order to make a troop compartment in the rear part of the vehicle. So the heavy IFV has a swapped front end with the rear. It is driving backwards comparing with the original Armata MBT.
This armored vehicle is operated by a crew 3 men, including commander, gunner and driver. Crewmembers are located in the center of the vehicle, behind the front engine compartment. Troop compartment is located at the rear. It is unknown how many passengers this vehicle can carry. It is likely that this heavy IFV accommodates 6 to 7 dismounts. Troops egress and dismount via rear power-operated doors.
It has newly-developed base armor, made of steel, ceramics and other composite materials. Also it has Malakhit add-on explosive reactive armor, that is claimed to be of new generation. A front-mounted engine provides additional protection for the crew and passengers. As usual this armored vehicle is fitted with NBC protection and automatic fire suppression systems. It has been reported that it will be fitted with new Afganit active protection system. It also has a new countermeasures system that reduces the chance of being hit by enemy anti-tank guided missiles with semi-automatic guidance.
This new Russian vehicle outguns most current troop carriers, based on tank chassis. It has unmanned turret, armed with 30 mm cannon, coaxial 7.62 mm machine gun and 4 Kornet-M anti-tank missile launchers. The same turret is also used on the Kurganets-25. The cannon has an effective range of up to 4 km. There are 500 rounds for the main gun, including 160 armor-piercing and 340 high-explosive fragmentation rounds. Currently the Kornet-M is one of the deadliest anti-tank guided weapons. These missiles have a maximum range of 8-10 km and can also target helicopters.
Initially it has been reported that this armored vehicle is powered by an A-82-2 turbocharged diesel engine, developing 1 200 hp. It is a new-generation engine that is much more compact than previous Russian tank engines. However in 2019 information emerged that this heavy IFV is fitted with a more powerful A-85-3 engine, developing 1 500 hp. Interestingly this rating is for a peak power which would be used only during wartime and at a cost of extremely short service life. Normally this engine develops 1 350 hp. Engine is located at the front and provides additional protection for the crew and passengers. Vehicle has 7 roadwheels. This heavy IFV has a built-in self-entrenchment blade and can briefly dig itself a defensive position.
Hope you enjoy!!
💥 💣 Check out our partnership clothing brand! Attire For Effect💣 💥 www.attireforeffect.com 📸 Also follow them on Instagram: # attire_for_effect
💰 Want to support my channel? Check out my Patreon Donation page! www.patreon.com/user?u=3081754
💰PayPal: paypal.me/Matsimus?locale.x=e...
Matt’s DREAM: www.gofundme.com/f/matt039s-c...
👕 Check out my Merch: teespring.com/stores/matsimus...
📬Wanna send me something? My PO Box: Matthew James 210A - 12A Street N Suite No. 135 Lethbridge Alberta Canada T1H2J
📸 My instagram: Matt_matsimus
🎮 Twitch: / matsimus_9033
👋DISCORD: / discord
📘 Facebook: profile.php?...
🐦Twitter: / matsimusgaming - Авто та транспорт
Download Fishing Clash for FREE here fishingclash.link/Matsimus and use my code MATSIMUS to get $20 worth of gifts for new players
В прибрежной зоне Энергодара дополнительно уничтожено две баржи с десантом по 140 бойцов на каждой и около 50 бойцов в районе Никополя, готовившихся к следующей транспортировке.Суммарная потеря элитных частей ССО ВСУ и ГУР ВСУ около 320 человек, 230 из которых проходили обучение в Великобритании.По данным, требующим дополнительной верификации, на побережье Днепра в районе Никополя погибли 6-8 офицеров британского Минобороны. В плену на данный момент уже 4 офицера ВСУ.
I thought it was designated the T-15 "Terminator"?
It would be interesting to see the statistics on how many of these T 15 Armada are burning in Ukraine
@@ilnur182
where's the translate button when you actually need it?
@@VerdeMorte ua-cam.com/video/yi14rzol_5I/v-deo.html
Basically, I'd say they learned from BMP series... Those things had decent firepower to support the infantry when needed, but the protection was rather bad... That is why they used them for support rather than troop carriers, but that also meant attracting more enemy fire and combined with not much armor... Yeah... High losses... T-15 seems to address those issues. But I guess we won't know until it is actually used in real action...
and it never will be seen/used if we go with the russian track record
It was the belief they needed to swim...
@@barukkazhad8998 Oh it can swim. Same way as their cruiser Moskva.
Hopefully it fails spectacularly!
Corrupt army of orcs.
@@charonboat6394 nothing wrong with a boat that can also be a submarine.
I like that you are able to be fascinated and appreciative to tech regardless of the politics right now.
Yeah man so many trolls around now
All 50 of them will be very pretty
Giving Russia to much credit there, probably never see one out of prototype phase
@@MrMruzi177 true
You mean 7 lol
For the last six months, the Russians have been making $1 billion in extra profit from gas sales every day, which is half the US defense budget. Considering the prices of Russian weapons and the salaries of soldiers, it is more like four budgets. Along the way, it grinds out the strongest army in Europe backed by unlimited funds from NATO, plus a legion of foreign mercenaries. One has to ask, does Russia need to rush into anything?
I'm sure Ukraine & allied countries will find them very informative after capture.
This is sick. Really cool vehicle.
Hoping to see some burned out on Khreshchatyk
loved that you used footage from Armored Warfare to show off the t-15 lol. Keep up the good work!
Man.. I don't know if I like the old or new music more, but thanks for not changing the intro... but after all these years I still love it!
4:34 the merkava has its own ifv counterpart in the Namer IFV which iirc was inspired by russia’s first “tank ifv” the BTR-T
You mean btr-t?
@@osefman2763 yep
its useless
@@Brian-qj4kk BTR-T or Namer? BTR-T never went into production so kinda never saw use anyways
@@voidphobia1850 it sort of did and it didn’t. A variant of it is currently used as the BMO-T, which is essentially the same thing just without the turret and 30mm.
The IDF pioneered this type of very heavy APC/IFV with Achzarit, Nakpadon and Namer. I'm very surprised it has taken this long for other nations to catch up. Similarly with the front engine MBT layout. There are many pros to having front mounted engines. The major con of poor driver vision is no longer an issue, with the introduction of cheap cameras and display screens. Driver vision can be better than ever before.
Canada built the Kangaroo in WW2 from Sherman's.
I was a merkava 4 driver and the front engine doesnt make it harder to see, the compartment was to the left of the engine so it didnt interfere, although the engine made it hot as hell in there
Why would you be surprised. Almost no one needs a “heavy” IFV when they’re almost completely useless in a modern peer to peer battle. The only use they have is against lightly to heavily armed personnel (unarmed Palestinian children) since any modern cannon can easily pen the “heavy” IFV armour
I think any armored vehicle (crewed not unmanned) still needs a backup drivers visionport to see throu incase the advanced vision cameras get hit or mulfunction.
Sorry for my english :)
@@siimpuu7548 Your english is very good Siim, thank you for the reply.
Russia has proven that while the philosophy of Quality over Quantity does hold merit, they have also proven that they are unwilling or unable to field the cost of such advanced units. Not even counting the sanctions, the T-14 has sat in Limbo for over half a decade and has now gotten to the point that, Russia wants to sell it for export without any battlefield testing. I think the T-15 looks amazing and if all of these advancements are accurate (because we all know the, Russians would never overstate the capabilities of their equipment) then it is a pretty amazing piece of equipment. I just can't see, Russia fielding these in any numbers that will matter. I could see the West utilizing something like this but again in small numbers. The forward blade reminds me of the G6 Rhino which has always looked and performed wonderfully. I wasn't paying attention but what were the measurements? Looks pretty damned big for deep penetration into urban areas.
The T-15 design seems nice on paper. Honestly, it seems pretty similar to something I would sketch if you told me I could design anything similar for my vast imaginary armor. The only problem is that Russia and I have pretty much equal capacity to field them in significant numbers in the real world. Unlike Russia, I can admit that my empire is completely imaginary.
given recent events I have to wonder
1- how many do they actually have ?
2- how well can it be operated by conscripts ?
3- how well dos it respond to substandard components being swapped into it due to corruption ?
Well, how many are in Ukraine?
There's your answer.
@@Marinealver I think 0 actually got there so far
All in all the armata platform is a very interesting prototype, all the derived vehicles are very well designed concepts. Would they ever see mass production? I doubt it very much.
b-but t14 armata has 80 productions 😳
Agreed. Very advanced concept but Russia doesn’t seem to have the capability to mass produce it.
It's not even that they don't have the money or ability. The Russian arms industry is woefully corrupt and has seen oligarchs get rich for very little in the way of results.
Russia going through a war and transferring to a war economy might fix many problems. Maybe we will see a few hundred units between all armata platforms in 2023/24.
@@AHalz nope they can
@@AHalz I think their priorities are to build another Vila for Shoigu 😁
But seriously they can produce them but now priorities are different. They're delivering T-90Ms for the army right now.
Yes, they remind me of the Israeli Nammer, which is a 60 ton APC based on the Mekava IV. The Namer is a specialized APC for urban environments and areas where they expect to face missiles. The main Israeli AFV will be the 30 ton wheeled Eitan.
Just what they need , a vehicle to support another vehicle that they really havent fielded and probably wont
Why would they have fielded it?
@@TheMarineGamerIGGHQ The T14 ? Because they only have about a BN of them , there isnt a foriegn after market for the t14 so they wont get the capital to produce a bunch of them
@@StabbinJoeScarborough that doesn't answer the question
@@TheMarineGamerIGGHQ which vehicle are you refering too ?
@@StabbinJoeScarborough the T14. Its not like they were in a rush up until now. They have had no reason to field it with the T90s and such they're still running. They don't have the US' people stealing funds to put into vehicles they wouldn't be using
Actually this IFV would be the equivalent of the Israeli NAMER IFV, that is based on the MERKAVA tank and not the tank itself. The MERKAVA can carry four troops in the back if the ammunition stored there is not carried and this is probably a feature to allow the evacuation of an other tank's crew in an emergency, rather than carry fighting troops although it is possible.
Kid: Mom I need a Merkava APC!
Mom: Sush! We have Merkava APC at home.
Merkava APC at home: Da
Comparing it to the Boxer AFV variant with a 120mm gun, weighs 45 tons and can carry 4-6 troops...IF I was an armoured brigade commander (which I'm very definitely not) I'd want a vehicle that enabled my infantry to keep up with the tanks, with decent protection and not get in the way...T-15 seems to do this neatly.
Damn, that thing is gorgeous.
It's such a good looking IFV.
I’d say the Puma ifv might be a closer comparison than the Merkava
Namer IFV is the closest comparison.
Coffin for eight brothers.
Great presentation thank you Sir
Can the turret FLY?
Sadly no, best thing it explodes, worst it just kinda burns, it doesn't have the same form of ammunition racks that make the pressure go upwards all spectacularly
Panther KF51 👑🇩🇪
The T-14 Armata did not break down on the parade, what happened then was just an inexperienced driver accidentally pulling the hand break. That is why the recovery vehicle struggled to move the tank
Yeah, sure 😂
Sounds logical. Would be a good reason to equip the Russian ammo dumps with handbrakes instead of ashtrays. 😉
@@Rampart.X "yeah sure" living in denial of basic facts when you have never even seen the video of the tank when it stopped which shows that the hand break was engaged
Your willful ignorance is pathetic
@@UndSieBewegt all Russian vehicles from the smallest of cars to the main battle tanks are equipped with hand break genius
Keep this content coming!
Bruh, the merkava isn't meant to carry infantry your confusing it with the namer (and the new namer AFV version).
The merkava can swap its ammo rack for soldiers in case of urgent med evac, but not meant to be used as such only in last resort situation.
As for the new namer fighting vehicle version, it's armed with 30mm and spike missiles, both heavier armor and more armed than the t15 amata
Yeah...I thought the same thing.
Uh no I strongly disagree
First of all the namer definitely absolutely is nowhere near the T-15 in terms of protection, not even close..
Second of all I would argue that the T-15's kornet is just better than the spike missile on the namer
@@someboi4535 lmao no.
The namer weights 12 tonns more than the t15 making it much more armored, and equipped with trophy APS which is extensively battle proven active protection system, unlike the Russian one.
And the spike NLOS is far supirior to the kornet in every aspect.
The t15 amata is far inferior to the namer in every aspect except mobility
*You're
@@bruhh249
But unmatched as a parade float 😭 lol
Good video mat.
Quite a sexy thing, would like to know if it can catch up with the 'relativ' low price of T-14. I guess its a great thing to have swaped so much of your armor to ERA, so they're not just lighter, it also can make repairs in teh field much easier and sustain longer operation times. Meanwhile the mass production of standardised ERA for several types of vehilces would reduce overall costs. And again in fitting more vehilces with such armor, ther more 'basic' body can be upgraded longer into the future and enahnce service life a lot. 10 out of 10 if there is no problem with money, i guess.
I mean if it was the US making these things… then sure.
But when it’s Russia… who has an equivalent total GDP equal to California… no.
@@LawAndTheory Yes economy is always an secondary battlefield - the main, for many products.
There is an global economy war ongoing on weapons, so maybe many nations will go for more basic stuff so the're not that much entagled in this war.
But you can absoluty say that T-15 is too much in one package. Great for the soldiers inside, but tricky to field in numbers able to protect such a vast nation. It was a showing of ability and advertisement, so we have to sit back and wait fro the market to cool down. So far all these 'flex' products are super expensive, and we'll see who end up on which side of teh trade wars (whcih is way more relevant as what nations need what kind of equipemnt). But i'm happy for every person in service being protected by something like this.
@@LawAndTheory It must be mighty, as i'm german and had way more complex discussions with people from all around the world xD
But for sure the problem isen't on your side. That would be naive to think =P
@@LawAndTheory Happy to hear we can agree on this^^
@@LawAndTheory Usually the sane and responsible buyers wouldn't jump into big buys before the product is tested and proven. No one would pay for an army of prototypes.
2:15 this animation is from free to play game armored warfare, game about tanks, t15 tank is highest their vehicle in game - 10, I highly recommend anyone who likes tanks to try out armored warfare, you will like it ;)
I always liked that Russia takes profile under serious consideration. Unlike the U.S that seems love barn doors
What they dont take into consideration is that at some point soldiers are going to dismount.
Just look at the BRDM. Would you like to crawl over the engine before dismounting ?
They often only think about the profile. The crew doesn't have the space to be confortable (which is very important when you can be days inside the vehicle...)
Could you do a video on the ASCOD Tanks, like the American Griffin MPF and the Philippine Sabrah
Hmm... is Russia going to afford this vehicle? I mean, just as they bring back T-62 into service.....?
Well because of the war the military has become a way bigger priority for the Russian state. Now they have to modernize their army even if it takes away funds from other sectors. It is not just a prestige project anymore to produce these new vehicles. And do people actually still believe that these T-62s seen in Ukraine were meant for the Russian army? It has been proven a couple of times now that they have been provided for the DPR and LPR forces and not for the Russians.
they wont be able to produce anything for years after this war, they couldn't even produce them before the war when their economy was at least in working state now no fucking way lmao
@The Beginning is Near The Banderites barely used tanks.
They went to guerilla war from the start and squandered their conventional forces.
@The Beginning is Near
No. There was plenty of footage of tanks in good shape that never left their base.
Saint Javelin awaits!
It's better to compare this to the Namer. The Merkava can carry troops but at a cost of removing some of the shells for the main gun.
What game/sim did you get that footage from? I’ve seen it in previous videos as well but it doesn’t look like Steel Beasts, GHPC, or something like Warthunder
game is called 'armored warfare'
That is a cool looking vehicle and Seems capable.
It`s a shame we`ll never see it blown into smithereens in Ukraine as it never will be produced.
Wheres all the Soviet throbbers these days ?? I miss reading that the mig 21 would beat a f22 or the t72 would destroy a m1 abrams
Tf you talking about
hes just schizophrenic@@purhepechatumbi3915
Where's Abrams??
Thanks For sharing ...I think in Nearly Future Focusing upon Crews Protection Behind Huge Mass Engines Become a Global Armor Design Doctrine . in additional of Joining Most Progressive Electronic Systems to Detecting & intercepting Drones
Ooh! Both of them.
Could you please do a video on the French Jaguar IFV. Sadly it never gets any love 🙁
Great sponsor. It's a Russian tracked troop carrying version of the HMS Rodney.
I vote best intro on UA-cam
The concept, considering Russia's military priorities, is great. The issues will arise on the back end though. Can they produce enough of them to matter? Can they support it once it's been deployed? These things are very important and based on the current performance of their military it's looking like the answers to those questions will be a hard "No."
I agree. The logistics of maintaining this vehicle will be easier, in terms of parts, given it is a shared platform. However, at nearly 50 tons, it is going to be a very thirsty beast and yet more tractor fodder, should the Russians not get their act together.
Good point, in one word CHIPS!
Are you a specialist on any matter regarding Russian defense industry? Answer a hard "NO". So don't give any answers before you know anything about it at all...
@@stingerrgb2754 Please try to remain civil. By your definition, nobody would be able to say anything about any country's defence industry, because at its heart ALL the important information is always going to be classified.
One does not need to be an expert on the Russian defence industry, to be able to make some useful observations. Defence manufacturing has commonalities around the world, so if you are familiar with the processes, and technologies, you can make useful observations.
For example, we know from captured equipment, that a significant proportion of the high tech found in Russian equipment is sourced from Western countries and is now sanctioned. This makes sense, as Russia lacks any capacity to manufacture even low end computer chips.
We also know that, following the initial 2014 sanctions, Russia has found workarounds that allow it to produce at least some high tech equipment in limited quantities. But that they appear to be making the same mistake as WW2 Germany, in that they are wasting these in one shot "precision" wunderwaffe, rather than more boring equipment, that might actually change the dynamic on the battlefield.
Given just how much equipment Russia has lost since February, combined with the fact that they were gambling on a short war, it is unlikely that they'll be able to make good their losses of high tech components without significant buy in from nations, like China, that have already demonstrated a huge reluctance to get involved and who would arguably benefit from a militarily weakened Russia.
Don't forget that the Russian port of Vladivostok used to be Chinese and they'd love the opportunity to take it back and obtain a Pacific port that bypasses the First Island Chain.
With respect to the entire Amarta program, we know that they are years behind schedule. By now, they were supposed to have over 2,000 T-14s and very few of the older Soviet era designs remaining in active service. We can objectively observe that this is not the case.
Also, they are unlikely to ever field these weapon systems, in their current configuration.
Unless the Russians are too stupid to learn from the current conflict, they'll be looking to significantly increase the top armour protection of all these vehicles. Against modern ATGMs the traditionally poor top armour of all previous generations of armoured vehicles has turned out to be a significant point of failure.
By way of example, after their experiences in the Gaza Strip, Israel redesigned the Merkava to be far more resilient to top down attacks, even going so far as to remove the loader's hatch, as this created a point of weakness.
The Russians could just slap on more armour and be done with it. But then they'll face the same issue that the WW2 Germans had with many of their rushed vehicles, in that they'll discover all sorts of problems, because you can't just throw a few tons of armour onto a vehicle, without it straining the suspension, engine, drivetrain and making it top heavy and more prone to rolling (See PzKpfw V - AKA Panther). Modern weapon systems are complicated beasts and you can't change one aspect, without it impacting the entire package.
The question about logistics and support for the vehicle, once fielded is significant. The Amarta series is a huge departure from all previous generations of tank. It will need expert maintenance personnel who are highly trained on all of its unique features and bleeding edge technology. This doesn't happen overnight.
For example, if the external cameras stop working, you'll need someone who knows exactly how they are wired, and likely points of failure, in order to get the vehicle back on track. No cameras, no ability to reverse safely, which would be a real bitch for your accompanying infantry.
We also know, from announcements made by the Russian MOD that they are focusing on upgrading vehicles currently in storage. Given that they have only limited resources, this will inevitably put the Amarta program further behind making the entry of any of these vehicles into the current conflict increasingly unlikely.
Man I just found your channel because of this video definitely subscribing to you also I love Russian vehicles
It would make a wonderful trophy
You probably have more T-15 in that sim than they do in real life.
Delete the probably and ur correct
Are you guys okay? you both behave like women.
It’s as if a Bradley and BMP had a IFV baby! ☺️👍
Now for the fun part tech and money
Great video, thanks for the shoutout.
i cant wait for the T-16 i wonder what it will be
Thats basically a concept vehicle.
I wonder if they can put the t14 turret on top and change the compartment into an ammo rack and reloading mechanism. Way too much weight at the back or nah? Cuz that would make the armata the most customizable assault system in the world cutting down price with universal supplies no matter what your purpose is. I guess using the same engine, tracks, and hull already achieved it anyways.
Anyone know what those flaps sticking out of the front sides are?
In ten years we’ll have 10 of these in parade conditions
😂
cope
„We have Merkava in the motherland”
The Taliban still laugh at you and your superiority
@@unknownarchon8860 You're right. Russains lost so many soldiers in Afganistan.
if someone confuse why some t-15 has big and some has small gun.
Short 57-mm gun is more like grenade launcher, and big one is 57-mm gun. There is also exist giant 57-mm AA gun, but it used on Derivatsiya. Bigger gun - bigger armor penetration and worse ammo capacity.
Looks they have taken a BTR and added on some extra stuff.
wow it's huge
honestly, just strap Drozhd on it that covers the front and sides and a roller or something to trigger mines would make the older Russian ifvs fairly viable. heat warheads and mines are the 2 biggest threats, counter those and your good to go.
Let me know when we have an APC that can operate on Mars.
Nobody knows how far it can pop the turret. This might be a winner in the future turret tossing competition
How many washing machines will have to be scrapped to feed the electronics of one of these?
A bit on the long size. Is it fielded?
The turret is not autonomous. It is unmanned, or crewless, in the sense there are no humand heads inside it.
oh goody, more fodder for drone directed artillery, Javelins, etc...
Not related to the T15 but can someone please answer , what is the purpose of the rubber skirts on the front lower hull of Russian tanks ? Camo , mine detonation? Thanks
rpg stand off armor.
@@Sir_Godz thank you !
The head of the plant that's supposed to build these was arrested for embezzlement of the funds lol
I officially dub it the death flounder
The T15 is so protected it’s still hiding in Russia.
from what ive read up the production is worse than the T-14.. and theres even only 40 T-14s in service
Yes 3 or 4 were used in Syria and prove to perform poorly, all were knocked out and quickly covered up to not show the weakness.
@@Dragonfire-tn2jg That was false news. The T-14 was never tested in Syria . Theres literally no evidence of any even being deployed there. That was a false story for anti russian propaganda. Plus if the Syrian militia destroyed it they would of taken videos and pictures like they always do whenever they attack a tank
@@Dragonfire-tn2jg nice made up story
Have any made it to combat?
Be missed used if deployed
Has anyone noticed how matsimus viewers have fallen from milions to thousands
Lol, I used this thing in Armored Warfare before I quit playing like a year ago. Seeing it here almost makes me want to play again.
But the most important question is: will it use dishwasher microchips?
Seems like another javelin bait to me.
Edit: its a joke yall
My very thought.
Okay okay! Keyboard warrior.
Another internet military genius 😂😂
It was a really bad joke then.
Expect people to be calm when making a joke like that at a time like now? ^^
Maybe if Russia and China collaborated they might be able to develop a dependable washing machine and dryer at best!
So how many yachts will this program yield?
it does look good though.
It’s good parade vehicle, but not much else
The T15 looks so good Russia has realized that it is time to abandon BMP and BTR That's why the T15 Armata is made to replace the BMP. And Boomerang is made to replace BTR
Re 7:07
How can smoke grenades "damage" a targeting system?
I think the T-15 would be more comparable to the Namer than anything else, it's definitely alot closer to that in weight than others.
Some mix between Terminator and BVP 80
Just looks like a bmp with a new skin
Nothing like it
Why invest in this for your basic infantry if you let them run around with iron sight AKs anyways?
Another attempt at showing the world how advanced you are when your armored vehicles in UA don't even have GPS.
What the West would call a technology demonstrator
The pavement princess
Is that Steal Beasts at 4:00?
Despite US sanction Russia could make high tech
I wonder if they have even 10 of them
If they did they would have deployed them by now it took them ages to deploy the t90 thinking it would turn the battle but fount it was no better
Were some 3D views of this vehicle from the Armored Warfare game ?
The only issue is, that Russia would need at least 800+ pieces of this machine. Which takes a lot of time.
What game is that with the T15?
Looks like Arma 3
There's nothing in the world quite like russian sci-fi weapons. God! they are so neat on paper and YT videos (hell! - even better on "Tik-tok"! - the global mediatic platform for the mentally insane!).
But will any ever exist? Probably not in great numbers.
What a beautiful Indian vehicle....
Both parts of this statement are true and false at the same time:
"T-15 Armata doesn't exist. It can't hurt you."
Bayraktar Bunu beğendi😘😎
Do a video on the Kurganets-25 please .I think its the true successor to the BMPs
*BMDs
@@fuckedlaptop364 BMD is just what airborne version of BMPs are called, usually same but smaller and less armor
i forgot this thing exist.
Can anyone tell me what game is at 3:54?