Episode 22. Armata. Terra Incognita.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 вер 2020
  • The newest and the most classified Russian Armed Forces tank T-14 Armata was for the first time shown to the journalists at a fire range. Aleksey Egorov, narrator and filmmaker from Zvezda TV Network, has got a unique opportunity to see how the new tank behaves off road, to sit inside the Armata, find out the secrets of tank’s armor and engine. But most importantly - to witness how the T-14 opens fire!
    One of the most sensational episodes of Combat Approved is dedicated to the Armata - the terra incognita of the Russian armament. Its speed, the fire rate of its weapons, what material its armor is made of, and other performance characteristics remain unknown. For the first time, we unveil the mysteries of the Armata!
    #Russianmilitarypower #Russianmilitary #military #Russianarmedforces #armedforces #army #russianarmy #CombatApproved #Zvezdatv #t14armata #t14tank #t14armatainside #t14armatatank #t14armatаinaction #tank #armatatank #weapon #russianweapon
    / zvezdanews​
    / zvezdanews​
    / ​
    / ​
    t.me/zvezdanews
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 779

  • @duxd1452
    @duxd1452 3 роки тому +47

    The commercials for Russian weapons get better and better! I'm sold, where can I buy one of those Armata's?

    • @duxd1452
      @duxd1452 3 місяці тому +1

      @@pavelmdify I guess they spend the whole budget on the commercials 🤣

  • @drewypooy25
    @drewypooy25 Рік тому +33

    In short, the Armata that "broke down" at parade was actually driven by someone that wasn't fully trained with its tech. He turned on the handbrake, which is why it didn't move when towed, even though it should have moved. Someone figured out what he did and took off the handbrake and got the Armata moving very shortly after.

    • @BLACKOMAMBO
      @BLACKOMAMBO Рік тому +1

      We will never know what really happen that day, tho we shouldnt rule out a mechanical failure no matter what the Russian said

    • @marcellomartinelli6453
      @marcellomartinelli6453 9 місяців тому +4

      ​@@BLACKOMAMBO a mechanical failure it's impossible because the tank didn't move when they tried to tow it, that means the engine or the transmission had no problems, and a mechanical problem can't solve by itself in a couple of minutes

    • @Harry-ff4vx
      @Harry-ff4vx 7 місяців тому +1

      A mechanical failure wouldn’t necessarily mean the tank can’t move a tanks engine could be completely destroyed and provided broken parts are not jamming on eachother I can still rotate just fine maybe a Ben freer than before due to the engines pistons not having compression the tank broke down because it’s engine is baised of the SLA 16 used in the nazi tiger and king tiger a diesel X configuration engine that was terribly unreliable and to an extent most X engines are this way that’s why they are so uncommon

    • @marshalljulie3676
      @marshalljulie3676 5 місяців тому

      The young driver had the brakes engaged that's why the tank did not move even when they tried to drag it if you watch the full video you will see an old driver then investigates and disengage the brakes and the tank moved under it's own power. Just watch the full video.

    • @andrewaustin6369
      @andrewaustin6369 4 місяці тому

      If we accept that the driver was inexperienced with the T14 how bad does that make Russia look.

  • @LoFiOAS1S
    @LoFiOAS1S 3 роки тому +68

    Greetings from Serbia!!!!

    • @LoFiOAS1S
      @LoFiOAS1S 3 роки тому +1

      @samo zeleno plači

  • @ihatecabbage7270
    @ihatecabbage7270 3 роки тому +159

    Dammit, why did your shows hide from me for so long. I thought I never find this amazing channel again!

    • @RealDigitalWar
      @RealDigitalWar 3 роки тому +1

      Support my channel guys! T-55 against M-84: ua-cam.com/video/QghKJi1JQQc/v-deo.html

    • @199diesel
      @199diesel 3 роки тому +8

      You tube censors all content now. Even int he USA we rarely get what we look for.

    • @flamingosaredumb7693
      @flamingosaredumb7693 2 роки тому

      @@RealDigitalWar that video is shit

    • @ff5x2
      @ff5x2 Рік тому +1

      вы многое не видели ) ua-cam.com/video/bI1UuiJDXlI/v-deo.html

    • @HakujinTrue
      @HakujinTrue Рік тому +3

      western propaganda, hides pro-russian videos

  • @user-ho2od8rq4n
    @user-ho2od8rq4n 3 роки тому +96

    Слава Нашим Конструкторам👍🇷🇺

    • @user-cp3bw3lz8k
      @user-cp3bw3lz8k 2 роки тому +10

      From Iraq, we're with Russia.

    • @dinvorren5247
      @dinvorren5247 Рік тому

      СЛАВА ПРОПАГАНДЕ !!!!ВСЕ УЖЕ ГОВНО!!!

    • @rgbforever4561
      @rgbforever4561 7 місяців тому

      ​@@user-cp3bw3lz8kwell good luck then.

  • @rosszografov614
    @rosszografov614 3 роки тому +8

    Привет от България!!!

  • @nzbomber685
    @nzbomber685 3 роки тому +18

    Love from new Zealand

  • @TheMadVulpen
    @TheMadVulpen 3 роки тому +17

    Beautiful tank right there

  • @wavie7890
    @wavie7890 3 роки тому +11

    what makes it so cool are the good edits

  • @niceuneasy
    @niceuneasy 9 місяців тому +6

    Love Russian gear getting to look amazing!!

  • @user-vy4gi5jo7i
    @user-vy4gi5jo7i 3 роки тому +35

    Какой же красавчик👍

  • @mijamoog7157
    @mijamoog7157 9 місяців тому +3

    dzięki za film -super

  • @BeKindToBirds
    @BeKindToBirds 3 роки тому +36

    To be having an interview about tanks in Kubinka, this man has the best job. Also, the armata platform is very impressive, many very advanced features in this vehicle.

    • @SnowAndReef
      @SnowAndReef Рік тому

      Too bad they don’t see combat, and they likely never will. Russia just sends old equipment to Ukraine. Almost like the Russians don’t have anything else.

    • @BeKindToBirds
      @BeKindToBirds Рік тому

      @@SnowAndReef Russia often makes these kinds of military advancements that don't proliferate to the common soldier, it's a product of the military culture their tzar's have and the obscene corruption.
      Truly it is robbing the parents and families of russian tank crews but since the country is in an illegal war of invasion it is perhaps all for the best that Russian corruption did such damage.
      From a completely cold blooded perspective with no life on the line it is a shame we have not seen more of this platform in action however.

    • @BRMCX69
      @BRMCX69 Рік тому +1

      @@SnowAndReef how electricity going on now? still in darkness?

    • @SnowAndReef
      @SnowAndReef Рік тому

      @@BRMCX69 What? You think there are power outages going on in the States? Good one.

    • @BRMCX69
      @BRMCX69 Рік тому +1

      @@SnowAndReef nah, you just got dementia & pedo president in the states.

  • @petrblazek9507
    @petrblazek9507 3 роки тому +35

    When he was alone in that tank and had autotarget that moving vehicle, I was just saying Dont press any button !!!

    • @oniecchi
      @oniecchi 3 роки тому

      Human way is do opposite

    • @darealtuna8588
      @darealtuna8588 Рік тому +1

      You will never read this but this tech has been in tanks since the 70’s…

  • @afghanmilitaryofficer9877
    @afghanmilitaryofficer9877 3 роки тому +19

    love you RUSSIA

  • @materialgworl3829
    @materialgworl3829 3 роки тому +20

    Greetings from Singapore

    • @singaporepatriots3077
      @singaporepatriots3077 3 роки тому +1

      Do you agree that SG should start buying defence tech/equipment from Russia? Better and cheaper on tax payers pockets bro...

    • @marijnnn4992
      @marijnnn4992 2 місяці тому

      ​@@singaporepatriots3077not beter

    • @marijnnn4992
      @marijnnn4992 2 місяці тому

      ​@@singaporepatriots3077and the t14 armata is more expensive then most nato tanks

  • @singaporepatriots3077
    @singaporepatriots3077 3 роки тому +76

    The Armata T-14 & T-15 are like the Lambo Avetador of the tank world

    • @BeKindToBirds
      @BeKindToBirds 3 роки тому +4

      More like the Ferrari with their advanced electronics

    • @oniecchi
      @oniecchi 3 роки тому

      But better

    • @elvita13282
      @elvita13282 2 роки тому +3

      @SWEEVP well, fortunately in the real world when Russia has the best aircrafts, tanks and submarines.

    • @californiahighwaypatrol577
      @californiahighwaypatrol577 2 роки тому +4

      Abrams is lambo

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 2 роки тому +13

      @@elvita13282 this comment didn't age well lol. Russian armor/aircraft is getting wrecked right now.

  • @pacificrider08
    @pacificrider08 3 роки тому +22

    Beautiful design

  • @beachcomberbloke462
    @beachcomberbloke462 3 роки тому +6

    The T-14 Armata leaves other tanks floundering in it,s dust tracks. Thanks so much for this enlightening documentary presented by the brilliant Aleksey Egorov.

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 2 роки тому

      Yeah the dozens they have produced are a force to be reckoned with.

  • @zirkon-jq8tn
    @zirkon-jq8tn 3 роки тому +9

    The best.

  • @sagapermana4659
    @sagapermana4659 3 роки тому +20

    Wooowwww soo cooolll, I love this channel 🤩🤩🤩

  • @piyaratyee7832
    @piyaratyee7832 3 роки тому +9

    Hello Fc from thailand

  • @yuanfurbax
    @yuanfurbax 6 місяців тому +3

    Can't wait for this to come to Warthunder Rank 8 ground

  • @juanpapaqui5971
    @juanpapaqui5971 3 роки тому +8

    Excellent documentary👍👍💪💪

  • @Aniqabbas
    @Aniqabbas 3 роки тому +7

    Thumbs up to this wonderful show

    • @redfalconvfx7050
      @redfalconvfx7050 3 роки тому +1

      you have UA-cam channel too... I follow you from Facebook

  • @krakca
    @krakca Рік тому +13

    388 days of special operation, still no sighting of the elusive super tank on the field

    • @1k20a
      @1k20a Рік тому +5

      Thats because its only effective if its not being shot at

    • @wifi_soldier5076
      @wifi_soldier5076 Рік тому +1

      That's because one of the t-14 biggest features is its super stealth ability. We have only seen 20 of them, but in reality there are 1000s.

    • @trololoev
      @trololoev 11 місяців тому +2

      Against who? There is no target for them. It like saying "no poseidon was used in Ukraine"

    • @krakca
      @krakca 11 місяців тому

      @@trololoev I dont get your comment? You saying the RUF is doing so well, they dont even need to use their shiny equipment?

    • @marcelkroeze7580
      @marcelkroeze7580 9 місяців тому +1

      ​@@krakcathe armata isnt the right tank for this kind of war. Wars like iraq and Afghanistan it would be great when you don't know who or where the enemy is than all sensors and systems can help you. In Ukraine tanks are off little use, artillery and drones in combination with infantry is what makes a difference. The T15 APC would be a great asset tho.

  • @No-timeforimbeciles
    @No-timeforimbeciles 2 роки тому +17

    The Armata is indeed a beautiful tank

    • @trololoev
      @trololoev Рік тому

      only t-14 is tank, all other armata is not a tank.

    • @notaheretic6675
      @notaheretic6675 Рік тому +1

      yea its even prettier when its blown up by a drone

    • @notaheretic6675
      @notaheretic6675 Рік тому

      @Joshua Nellis wasn't it in service in syria?

    • @ChileanWagner.777
      @ChileanWagner.777 8 місяців тому

      Not that I know.
      I have never heard of Russia sending T-14 Armata tanks to any country. Actually, this tank has never been in real combat. Not even in Ukraine.

    • @No-timeforimbeciles
      @No-timeforimbeciles 8 місяців тому

      @@ChileanWagner.777 in April 2020, the Russian defence ministry confirmed it had seen service in Syria, & it has also had a limited field service in ukraine recently

  • @user-ch3qh7gd9g
    @user-ch3qh7gd9g 3 роки тому +35

    This is a very good tank in the world 👍

  • @mg4241
    @mg4241 3 роки тому +3

    Best

  • @achinachin3939
    @achinachin3939 Місяць тому

    Very2 nice...up to date this tank armata....uraaaa

  • @sonofagun6856
    @sonofagun6856 2 роки тому +1

    Going under assembly with white shirt.!
    Most daring person !

  • @vurkzy8432
    @vurkzy8432 2 роки тому +7

    This guy has a better job than Jeremy Clarkson 😂

  • @Suli5241
    @Suli5241 Рік тому +8

    Watching this in 2023, and listening to the statements in this episode makes me laugh xD

    • @ARCHITEKTVonDerAnderenWelt
      @ARCHITEKTVonDerAnderenWelt Рік тому +1

      Смейся над своей Украиной, где ты живешь. Русское новейшее оружие показывает прекрасные характеристик и все больше поступает в армию.

    • @kingsnakke6888
      @kingsnakke6888 Рік тому +1

      @@ARCHITEKTVonDerAnderenWelt Keep yapping, pet of Putin.

  • @mohammadkarimzai8057
    @mohammadkarimzai8057 Рік тому +5

    This is making Armat tanks the world highest technology war fair weapons. If these information was just 1% of characteristics of this tanks then it is very sophisticated tank almost like robotic machine.

    • @ARCHITEKTVonDerAnderenWelt
      @ARCHITEKTVonDerAnderenWelt Рік тому

      Он заточен под будущую модернизацию в виде беспилотного танка,с внешним управлением и с возможностью внедрения полноценных роботизированных систем.

  • @user-ho2od8rq4n
    @user-ho2od8rq4n 3 роки тому +18

    Опять что-то эти Русские придумали😂👍👊

  • @nikolasimovic1285
    @nikolasimovic1285 3 роки тому +19

    Best tank ever

    • @PissGOOGEL
      @PissGOOGEL Рік тому

      @Joshua Nellis Porsche Type 101? Wow, that explains the stop at the parade. 😁

    • @BLACKOMAMBO
      @BLACKOMAMBO Рік тому

      ​@Joshua Nellis *germans

  • @kemskyfarezy
    @kemskyfarezy 3 роки тому +6

    AWESOME OPENING

  • @mikecimerian6913
    @mikecimerian6913 2 роки тому +8

    Nice to have an English translation. A lesser drawl from the narrator would distance this documentary from many stereotypes. This is constructive. :) I enjoy watching this of course. This is great modularity. Interoperability saves on costs and has a strategic value at the logistical-strategic level.

  • @Delta-2-0
    @Delta-2-0 3 роки тому +4

    Agoy! 🤘

  • @Tentacl
    @Tentacl 3 роки тому +8

    It's not combat proven, but the concepts are very inovative and damn, it's a sexy looking family of armored vehicles.

    • @hibojoe1477
      @hibojoe1477 3 роки тому +1

      I think it is combat proven now, didn’t they send it to Syria?

    • @Tentacl
      @Tentacl 3 роки тому

      @@hibojoe1477 I think they sent one or two, but never saw combat footage with it, maybe they sent it to some VERY low threat area just to be safe... or just ran mobility trials, etc.
      Edit: I actually just saw BMPT-2 terminator (based on the T-72 chassis) sent to Syria, not the Armata family.

    • @nedkiryakov4824
      @nedkiryakov4824 3 роки тому

      It's combat approved! Tank was tested in Syria!

    • @exodios._.7897
      @exodios._.7897 2 роки тому

      @@nedkiryakov4824 could you send me the source?

    • @sam8404
      @sam8404 2 роки тому

      They haven't even produced enough of these to say they're combat proven yet.

  • @MeanLaQueefa
    @MeanLaQueefa 3 роки тому +6

    Always love a nice looking tank, I do wonder about the guns stabilization, during the parade you can see it bouncing around.

    • @southautomatic2239
      @southautomatic2239 3 роки тому +9

      Во время парадов стабилизаторы отключены по требованиям безопасности. В противном случае орудие, повторяя рельеф, может нанести травмы экипажу, стоящему в люках по парадному.

    • @nauuwgtx
      @nauuwgtx 3 роки тому +2

      They might can be turned off

    • @trololoev
      @trololoev Рік тому +2

      @@nauuwgtx they should be turned off during parades.

    • @jannuzijannuzicharlescharl3260
      @jannuzijannuzicharlescharl3260 Рік тому

      The stab is only used for the special maneuver where they pivot steer / neutral steer the tank 360 degrees while the gun stays fixed on one target--all synchrhonized so an entire platoon does it.

  • @hafizahmohdrawi5057
    @hafizahmohdrawi5057 2 роки тому +6

    Rasmi diperkenal masa ulang tahun Russia tak lama dulu..... org ramai yg lihat sorak kuat sbb lihat tank Armata pertama kali..simple tp canggih digital semua didalamnya..punyai 3 crew dalamnya..terbaik Russia

  • @caturlifelive
    @caturlifelive Рік тому

    So amazing

  • @stoicissistisizedstoicassi812
    @stoicissistisizedstoicassi812 3 роки тому +6

    Hot Mother Russia!!!
    Them's tracked vehicles is the Shizznic!!
    Just to have the opportunity to drive one!
    You best believe that I'd sell off my right kidney for a chance like that!
    Leopard II is a Porsche in its own right.
    And Abrams is a Dodge Viper in it's own.
    Both are very nice..
    But Damn!!
    The T14 is the Lamborghini of tanks!!
    Just to drive one!

  • @spitfire3003
    @spitfire3003 Рік тому +2

    Hold on at about 5:30 he said reliable didn’t one armada break down in a rehearsal for the red square parade

    • @chrishansen456
      @chrishansen456 Рік тому +3

      My brother in Christ, this is propaganda, of course they will want the viewer to believe the tank is the best in the world

  • @vankhai02
    @vankhai02 5 місяців тому +1

    From 🇻🇳 with ❤

  • @jacksparrow-ie8uq
    @jacksparrow-ie8uq Рік тому +5

    T 14 armada is the most beautiful tank ever produced. Coming close in second is the leopard 2a7

    • @Ruslan_Ivanov2023
      @Ruslan_Ivanov2023 Рік тому

      может на Донбассе повоюет Т-14 .Пора уж

    • @davekessing2266
      @davekessing2266 Рік тому

      Nothing beats the T72BU in looks , not even the T90BM, although the T14 is gorgeous.

  • @puterausman7682
    @puterausman7682 3 роки тому +47

    The fighting compartment resemble US space x space craft with throes three large displays. This tank make abrams looks very old.

    • @emilianolaurenzi464
      @emilianolaurenzi464 3 роки тому +11

      Abrams is old, heavy, and vulnerable. (see Yemen).

    • @Cragified
      @Cragified 3 роки тому +3

      @@emilianolaurenzi464 You use any tank poorly and you will lose it. Such as sky lining themselves on a ridge with no infantry or artillery support like they did. M1 is just fine. T-14 isn't that impressive. It's main enhancement is that finally the crew doesn't immediately die when the autoloader carousel cooks off due to their protected compartment. However that same compartment makes it weaker in close in environments as the crew are reliant on remote weapons and optics as the commander can't be in an open protected position with good visibility cause he is in the front hull with the driver and gunner.
      There is no 'uber' tank anywhere in the world. There are tanks that get their job done. And the T-14 is a unique way to solve the one weakness of Russian armor which as been ammo cookoffs killing the crew instantly, though it still leaves the vehicle heavily damaged and perhaps even permanently lost. M1's blow off panels were a different solution, leaves the vehicle mostly unscathed, though left it vulnerable to being more easily knocked out from cluster bomblets.

    • @akumazakazaki9510
      @akumazakazaki9510 3 роки тому +13

      @@Cragified I do not know why you criticize the dependence of technology on modern war machines when it is what all the most advanced armies in the world are doing, totally depending on technology in all their equipment and weapons, the armata is the most modern tank in the world.
      world and despite the fact that its combat performance has not been tested, it has a lot of potential to offer and even other western military powers recognize it, on the other hand I don't know what armor weakness you are talking about, the tanks that have been destroyed in war are of origin Soviet and outdated used by small and little trained armies, and you said that yourself: "You use any tank poorly and you will lose it" that is a contradiction of yours, it would be better for you to re-analyze the conclusions you have reached and rethink a new context.

    • @Cragified
      @Cragified 3 роки тому +2

      @@akumazakazaki9510 Tanks or any other single war machine do not win wars on the ground. Tanks, IFVs, and Infantry work together as combined arms to complement each other. Believe it or not the tank's main role is not to engage other tanks but support infantry. There are so many examples to cite. Including the Russian experience of losing lots of T-80s in Chechnya in built up areas.
      Which is something the T-14 is inherently vulnerable to due to its reliance on remote optics and weapon stations because of its crew position.
      In open terrain warfare it is a very big upgrade on crew survivability for Russian tankers. Which is a big thing when you consider the Russian population is decreasing. And why they are sticking with an autoloader. Every 3 vehicles that is another crew if you have a crew of 3 instead of 4. Even though it puts a higher maintenance workload on each crew member due to there being one less.

    • @akumazakazaki9510
      @akumazakazaki9510 3 роки тому

      @@Cragified 1- I know in advance that the tanks are to support the infantry and all the tanks that exist in the world are vulnerable in urban combat, it is something obvious and there is no point in mentioning it, this argument of yours has no context in the discussion, You're diverting the topic
      2- "Which is something the T-14 is inherently vulnerable to due to its reliance on remote optics and weapon stations because of its crew position." once again you are contradicting yourself, the t14 armatta was created under modern military doctrine, which means in your words that the vehicle is supported by all kinds of equipment, radars, infantry, air support, etc, without this any tank in the world It is vulnerable, I repeat are your words.
      3-the survival capacity of the Russian tanker has always been high, since the Soviet Union armor and improvements have been created to protect the tank and the crew, of course there are now modern improvements but in their time they were at the forefront of armor, the The use of the automatic loader in addition to reducing the crew, contributes to reducing the size of the tank, in Soviet doctrine this meant maneuverability, stealth and material savings for more tanks and does not mean more work for the team, the automatic loader saves many movements and unnecessary maneuvers, also does not require much maintenance, mechanically they are reliable.
      4- also the issue of the crew and automatic loader are irrelevant in the case of the t14, I repeat, it is a modern machine under modern military doctrines, having a large crew is not necessary with technological advances and even the Americans know it, they are also developing an autoloader mechanism and an unmanned turret tank, you once again include a question not relevant to the case of the t14.

  • @barriewright2857
    @barriewright2857 3 роки тому +26

    Very impressive, from the reaction of the western power's, thay are scratching their collective head's trying to combat this. Obviously the Russian have created a formidable Tank that's making the western power think.

    • @viktoriyaserebryakov2755
      @viktoriyaserebryakov2755 3 роки тому +3

      There is no reason for them to be afraid. But it is still their job to try and stay ahead of the competition. Hard to say what is and isn't better when different tools are for different jobs but the T-14 is certainly moving in a different direction.

  • @anindyamukhopadhyay8
    @anindyamukhopadhyay8 3 роки тому +15

    Kruganetz 25 is the perfect balance of armour firepower and mobility
    Moreover increasing the side armour doesn't affect her amphibious capability.
    I would further like to add that ahe received the cost-effective version of Afghanit APS hard kill system and a new power pack churning 780hp instead of the previous 480 hp engine

    • @rgbforever4561
      @rgbforever4561 7 місяців тому

      This comment aged like milk

    • @joebenson528
      @joebenson528 5 місяців тому

      @@rgbforever4561
      Are you referencing the Ukr civil war?
      Losses
      NATO armed and trained Yahtzees: 800,000 (The Pentagon accounted for 1,200 KIA per day in the 2023 document leaks)
      DPR/LPR: 47,000
      Wagner: 20,000
      RU MoD: 1,000

    • @rgbforever4561
      @rgbforever4561 5 місяців тому

      @@joebenson528 I have never heard more outlandish shit.
      It's more like 70k Kia for Ukraine and 130+ for ruzzia

    • @joebenson528
      @joebenson528 5 місяців тому

      @rgbforever4561
      130k* for RU? How would they lose more troops than they deployed? You need to stop overdosing on Fox News and the BBC, bud. The Pentagon confirmed Ukr losses of 1,200 per day, and the ratio between both sides is ~10:1.
      If the banderties were winning, then they would have had a single successful offensive in 2 years. RU backed forces would not have maintained the LPR, DPR,
      Zaporozhye and Kherson land bridge. Elensky wouldn't have to draft individuals aged 16-60 (men AND WOMEN) kidnapping them off the streets of Odessa. Ukr Army wouldn't have an average age of 42 (it was 26 pre-2022). And the so-called Foreign/NATO legion wouldn't have to lie about their recruitment numbers; Claim 20,000-25,000, Reality 1,200-1,500 according to a New York Times investigation (poor Wali the super sniper bought into the propaganda, and ran away just 12 days into his war tourism).
      Not to mention, the RU Duma would have given VP full war powers 12+ months ago if they were losing as bad as US/NATO state media claims. But that's not necessary when an 8% mobilization is capable of crushing 4 separate NATO built-up Ukr armies/offensives in just under two years. Generations of military aged men either dead, ran away to western Europe to scam the locals out of their USD's, or oined the DPR/LPR to defend the Donbass.
      Fox "News", The Sun, BBC and the rest of the neocon media can not win proxy conflicts. Government funded search engines (Google) can only cover up the truth, but it does not influence the situation on the battlefield.
      When the 14th Waffen SS are defeated, your last cope will be "they thought it would end in 3 days". The "Big Lie" that was debunked day one on February 20, 2022, when VP said plainly this would be a protracted demilitarization. NATO is not good at supporting protracted conflicts (Korea, Vietnam 3x, Afghanistan, Iraq etc) we're only good at indiscriminately shelling civilian centers in Belgrade, Baghdad, Hanoi, Havana. Or running NGO* backed "regime change" campaigns (illegal coups) in hopes that the NATO armed locals overthrow their own governments: Kiev, Ukr 2013-Failing, NATO Spring 2011-Failed, Bangkok 2020-23, Myanmar 2021-Failed, Pakistan 2022, Brazil 2022-Failed.
      🇵🇸🇱🇧🇸🇾🇾🇪🇦🇲 > 🇪🇺

  • @Squnchmo
    @Squnchmo Рік тому +7

    This tank uses a engine design from WW2

  • @pashapasovski5860
    @pashapasovski5860 3 роки тому +1

    Armata concept was designed years ago, but technology wasn't yet progressive enough, things like cameras, electronics were not sophisticated enough! But it's a revolutionary solution for all tanks and even AI drones! It's modularity is encompassing every vehicle in military and every serious army will copy it in future

    • @DK-gl3ih
      @DK-gl3ih Рік тому

      It’s one hell of a tank

  • @MrScott664
    @MrScott664 3 роки тому +15

    Greetings from the united States, love the russian military and especially the russian ground vehicles

    • @ClaudeMagicbox
      @ClaudeMagicbox Рік тому

      But now the corrupt media have probably brainwashed you and you don't like them anymore.

    • @kingsnakke6888
      @kingsnakke6888 Рік тому +1

      Oh, you sweet summer child

    • @MrScott664
      @MrScott664 Рік тому +2

      @@kingsnakke6888 that comment aged like milk

  • @Basalt533
    @Basalt533 5 місяців тому +2

    Me encantan los equipos y sistemas rusos. Ha demostrado su gran superioridad en el campo de batalla!!!😎💯💪🏻🇷🇺

    • @marijnnn4992
      @marijnnn4992 2 місяці тому

      The oppiset realy

    • @marijnnn4992
      @marijnnn4992 2 місяці тому

      Why are you writing in spanish if your name and other text are russian

    • @Ascencio21
      @Ascencio21 Місяць тому

      @@marijnnn4992because he is from a poor south american country and pro russian who hates western equipment

    • @marijnnn4992
      @marijnnn4992 Місяць тому

      @@Ascencio21 i,m kinda thinking he is a bot or a russian faking being spanish

    • @Ascencio21
      @Ascencio21 Місяць тому

      @@marijnnn4992 a lot of spanish people is pro rusian idk why

  • @Misakimori_NM
    @Misakimori_NM 2 роки тому +2

    1 year ago... Serial production of Armata highly likely very different especially the T-14A like it did with T-90 & T-90A

    • @trololoev
      @trololoev Рік тому +1

      Atmate receive many upgrades. The more later Armata go into production, the better it be.

  • @MiroslavJezik-lm6mo
    @MiroslavJezik-lm6mo 6 місяців тому

    Amazing gun stabilization 11:36

  • @alexrobey745
    @alexrobey745 3 роки тому +2

    (26:20) you're 15 minutes into mechanised assault n' chill and your driver gives you this look

  • @7gmeister
    @7gmeister 2 місяці тому

    The turret sounds at least 😂
    I can just imagine the guys inside saying this turret is so much smoother than other tanks

  • @hafizahmohdrawi5057
    @hafizahmohdrawi5057 2 роки тому

    Klrga Armata T14 T15 T16 dgn berbagai guna setiap jenis tank

  • @SyafieHanifah
    @SyafieHanifah 2 роки тому +1

    I wish my country can purchase these Armata's family...

  • @egonieser
    @egonieser 3 роки тому +1

    It certainly is very capable on paper and the electronic systems make it formidable as computers don't make mistakes the same way people do.
    But electronics can also be a major flaw. When electronics break, if external sensors are shot, which often can be done even with small arms fire, then you can't take control of the systems manually which you can do with previous gen tanks.
    But then again, these tanks will still be supplemented with the tried and tested and reliable T-72B3's and T-90's which will fulfill the manual role as there's never just a single tank on the battlefield. This guy can be sitting at the back, popping targets left and right with sniper-like accuracy while other forces are engaged in a more conventional way I suppose.

    • @DK-gl3ih
      @DK-gl3ih Рік тому

      No

    • @darcgibson5099
      @darcgibson5099 Рік тому

      @@DK-gl3ih its explained in the second part of this video that all the electronic systems have manual duplicates should they be knocked out

    • @DK-gl3ih
      @DK-gl3ih Рік тому

      @@darcgibson5099 I’m not agreeing with the dude??

  • @YMTYMY
    @YMTYMY 3 роки тому +9

    would love to see those Armatas on American soil . and the Sukhois on their sky .

  • @ChileanWagner.777
    @ChileanWagner.777 8 місяців тому

    This is my favorite tank.

  • @hafizahmohdrawi5057
    @hafizahmohdrawi5057 2 роки тому +1

    Tank lapis baja terbaru buatan Russia...berat hampir 50 tan tank Armata ini...canggih semua tank buatan Russia ini sejak tank yg terdahulu lagi...

  • @bo2web
    @bo2web 3 роки тому +13

    17:20 T-14 on Victory Parade driven by conscript ? Give me a break.
    State of art tank is used by best crew !

    • @paintbrushdaddy3249
      @paintbrushdaddy3249 3 роки тому +1

      what bout the m1a2 SEP V3, Challenger 2 TES, Leopard 2A6/7's, AMX 56 Leclerc these are state of art tanks and most of them arent used by the best crews

    • @pashapasovski5860
      @pashapasovski5860 3 роки тому +4

      It was rushed out to participate in a Victory day parade, 2015 was celebration of 70 years of the greatest victory in entire history of mankind against the worst evil! Russia sacrificed over 25 million people, so they wanted to get the new tank,a tank being used as the main weapon! So the driver pressed a parking brake on automatic transmission, completely a new system at time! They couldn't move it,until another driver disconnected the brake! Afterwards he drove it away, all time filmed by many cameras and shown on many UA-cam videos

    • @nedkiryakov4824
      @nedkiryakov4824 3 роки тому

      A complete idiot is trying to look smart! You obviously have no idea about tanks! Keep on playing Call of duty

    • @trololoev
      @trololoev Рік тому

      even best crew doesn't have experience to drive this tanks.

    • @tommychong3269
      @tommychong3269 Рік тому +1

      @@pashapasovski5860 just because Germany stabbed the soviets in the back doesn’t make them automatically the good guys. Europe got rid of one empire for another one that was pretty much the exact same (Soviet Union).

  • @fahdismalek7729
    @fahdismalek7729 2 роки тому +1

    many country following your channel especially their arm forced. good job for the content. I cant compliment more

  • @alexbell9443
    @alexbell9443 Рік тому +2

    Nice paper tiger you got there

  • @simgxv
    @simgxv 3 роки тому +8

    M1A2: I'm the best
    T-14 Armata: Hold my Vodka !
    M1A2: ....

    • @worldoftancraft
      @worldoftancraft 2 роки тому

      Only desperate people drink this poison. Fonnie jokE!!!!111!1:)0000)0

  • @pouwakaruwhiu8349
    @pouwakaruwhiu8349 Рік тому +5

    Awesome weapon, I want one 🙂

  • @sparrowsbewertungen6930
    @sparrowsbewertungen6930 Рік тому +3

    NATO watching this
    *WRITE THAT DOWN, WRITE THAT DOWN*

  • @falconx5312
    @falconx5312 2 роки тому +2

    Interesting...I wonder how it would fare against an Abrams...

    • @amortaelliberum5726
      @amortaelliberum5726 2 роки тому +1

      Well, it wont. Because it's just few prototypes and the Russian economy is so fcked that it will remain few prototypes forever.

  • @eugenesevillano9809
    @eugenesevillano9809 2 роки тому

    Wow

  • @JohnGaltAustria
    @JohnGaltAustria Рік тому +1

    This is so unbelievable bad, it's good.

  • @hafizahmohdrawi5057
    @hafizahmohdrawi5057 2 роки тому +1

    Kilang yg hasilkan Armata kat Russia...The best tank brooooo

  • @kazimierzkalinowski1320
    @kazimierzkalinowski1320 11 місяців тому +2

    Czołem Wielkiej Rosji i Słowianskim Narodom ♥️🇵🇱♥️🇷🇺♥️🇧🇾🥷☯️✌️

  • @Shipnot_Nonindustries
    @Shipnot_Nonindustries 2 роки тому

    9:25 where to get tank platform with turret spin?

  • @comradeweismann6947
    @comradeweismann6947 3 роки тому +1

    Finally

  • @fenriraldrek1022
    @fenriraldrek1022 Рік тому

    The narrator has the most voice I’ve ever heard.

  • @mr787takium9
    @mr787takium9 3 роки тому +5

    Damn awesome features for this new age generations of tanks 1 design different platform to utilize in there specification purposes of any military branch need in the field of battle. Tnk,apc,recovery almost needed is in there a one of kind unique concept but this kind of price few nation would be able to bought this awesome tank.

    • @sarass2197
      @sarass2197 3 роки тому

      They have offered to india and usually china will buy some to reverse it plus some friendly countries capable of buying it.but the fact is russian never give half of the original to any country,so dont know who will buy it.but it is an amazing tank👍

    • @trololoev
      @trololoev Рік тому

      it cost less that most NATO tanks but more that any russian one. As i remember - 5 mln$ for Armata, 3 for t-90m and 500k to modernize t-72b into t-72b3

  • @krspykreame1
    @krspykreame1 2 роки тому +1

    I wonder if it can be operated fully remotely? That would be extremely interesting

    • @dewygreen4646
      @dewygreen4646 2 роки тому

      You can test it in Ukraine, but make sure, that the rain and snow do not deform the armor.

    • @user-nj5si7ms5l
      @user-nj5si7ms5l Рік тому

      У нас есть боевые роботы Уран-9 и машины поддержки танков Терминатор!

  • @muhammadindra9090
    @muhammadindra9090 3 роки тому +14

    Great Russia...😎

  • @korana6308
    @korana6308 4 місяці тому

    The best tank in the world when it eventually get released.

  • @markot9902
    @markot9902 Рік тому +5

    2 years later, first batches of T90 Proyv tanks are being delivered to RU forces in Eastern front while Armata is still just a prototype...
    Insane

    • @noobz5056
      @noobz5056 Рік тому +5

      Russia has a massive number of these Armata tanks in house ready to deploy in the event of all out war. They don't deploy their latest highly classified tanks to Ukraine. The T90's and the older models are more than enough to suffice. Something they didn't tell you about the stealth and electronic jamming of incoming missiles (including MANPADS) in this video is that not only the Armata tanks are equipped with this safety system but also the entire lineup of their older tanks and armored vehicles including helicopters and jets are equipped the same system which is why they have been so successful completing their mission on a daily basis in the current war in Ukraine. Very few losses of Russian military men and their war fighting machines.

    • @tomasgogashvily5350
      @tomasgogashvily5350 Рік тому +4

      @Jasper Percabeth OF course, Russia can afford 200 000 casualties

    • @tomasgogashvily5350
      @tomasgogashvily5350 Рік тому

      @@noobz5056 Given how many Russians die in masses, the Armata Tank is more important than the Russians themselves... I love your epic logic, what's your IQ?

    • @noobz5056
      @noobz5056 Рік тому

      @@tomasgogashvily5350 You have been brainwashed very heavily, by absorbing all the lies coming out of the mainstream media. The truth is that Russia only lost just over a hundred of their men since the Ukraine war started, whereas more than 80% of Ukrainian (Kyiv's army run by the U.S.) military men have been lost, some of which have deserted/fled. Trying to fight the Russians is a suicidal mission over there. You ask me if I have low IQ how about you check yours? Wake the hell up.

    • @buckshot9113
      @buckshot9113 11 місяців тому

      @@noobz5056 they say they have 20. we've only seen 8. they very much do not have a massive number of Armatas.

  • @louisbabycos106
    @louisbabycos106 3 роки тому

    Is the guy in the blue suit Admiral Binkoff from Binkoffs battlefields ?
    Joking

  • @bobbyguns100
    @bobbyguns100 3 роки тому +14

    The Russians are back, the have really done some amazing things in 15 years time. Amazing and also scary

    • @hokage64th
      @hokage64th 3 роки тому +2

      Dude. They can barely afford the very stuff like these that they develop. The Ruble is also almost worthless. You shouldnt be scared lol. How many Su-57s are made so far? How many of these new Armata’s are actually in service right now compared to aging T-72s and T-90s they still field?

    • @bobbyguns100
      @bobbyguns100 3 роки тому +10

      @@hokage64th war doesn’t work like that, they are self sufficient this is a very important part of war! The value of there effects them outside of country not inside. The only country that has the ability to fight us on our land and in the sea is Russia. So many people talk about economic crap not understanding the complexity of war. The Russians have abilities that we still don’t understand, and as do we that they don’t understand! Put it this way, our lives here in the United States would go to shit the first week of war with Russia !

    • @user-uq8yy1mp3d
      @user-uq8yy1mp3d 3 роки тому +3

      @@hokage64th The ruble is worthless in the United States, but there are many rubles in Russia. We invent and make our military equipment by Russian people at Russian enterprises. We do not need to convert our money into dollars in order to buy old, expensive and useless weapons from the United States like the rest of the backward world. Reduce and underestimate your enemy's bad and war-fatal quality.

    • @user-uq8yy1mp3d
      @user-uq8yy1mp3d 3 роки тому +3

      @@hokage64th The diminution you create and the minimum estimate of your enemy's forces, economy, and production could lead you to defeat in a future war. You can ask Napoleon and Hitler about this.

    • @HOTANDFUNKY
      @HOTANDFUNKY Рік тому

      @@bobbyguns100 Ukraine tells a very different tale

  • @dennyjanuar2861
    @dennyjanuar2861 Рік тому

    nmbak trget diam, dlm posisi stndby.. tegak lrus dlam jrak > 100 m bsa mleset hmpir 20 cm..
    masih butuh peningkatan.. smoga sekarang akurasinya sudah meningkat..

  • @lin837pr2
    @lin837pr2 2 роки тому

    That tank must be very comfy by the exclamations he did

  • @andreassk
    @andreassk 3 роки тому +14

    RIP Abrams 😁

    • @Daniel-jg8ff
      @Daniel-jg8ff 3 роки тому

      @@praetorian9196 And do you know how that budget is spent? Personnel payment and benefits take up approximately 39.14% of the total budget

    • @Daniel-jg8ff
      @Daniel-jg8ff 3 роки тому

      @@praetorian9196 ????

    • @scotthulsey8763
      @scotthulsey8763 3 роки тому +1

      Sabot would still go in one side out the other. It really about who gets that first shot off.

    • @shahrulizwan8118
      @shahrulizwan8118 3 роки тому

      It has been long gone bro😆😆

    • @Daniel-jg8ff
      @Daniel-jg8ff 3 роки тому

      @@scotthulsey8763 No it wouldnt... This is not an T55/62 or Iraqi downgraded localy manufactured T72 made by inferior materiel with no ERA. The T14 Armarna is probably One of the best protected tanks today. The Russians has learned alot by the two Gulfwars when they developed this tank and absolut the statement that it depends who gets of the first shell when then the Russians T14 has the upper hand with its superior atgm which can hit and defeat any modern tank at maximum effective-penetration range of 8 km. The T-14 is equipped with 26.5-40 GHz active electronically scanned array radar, which is used mainly by the APS. Up to 40 airborne or 25 ground targets down to 0.3 m (12 in) in size can be tracked simultaneously at a range of up to 100 km. The tracking system provides an automatic firing solution for the destruction of the target, which can then be transferred to either the APS or the main gun control computers.

  • @IkmalRusli
    @IkmalRusli 3 роки тому +3

    I love this russian combat tech channel. however please save Russia Weapon industry by showing just few details about those Russian high tech weapon. I just concern Chinese PRC may examine this and create they local copy of it and possibly sale it on Taobao or AliExpress at a discounted price.

    • @user-nj5si7ms5l
      @user-nj5si7ms5l Рік тому

      Скопировать эти технологии не возможно,они не идут на экспорт!

  • @fizzulf8677
    @fizzulf8677 3 роки тому +7

    A great engineer will never ever ever blame the operator... Those design flaw are made by you not them

    • @fizzulf8677
      @fizzulf8677 3 роки тому

      @SIRIUS Kizo Mi tell me why the driver cant restart the tank after he stalled? clearly there is a fault in the system. The tank driver didn't do anything wrong, its the engineer who should take the blame.

    • @mariano7699
      @mariano7699 3 роки тому +1

      Sabotages should be anticipated in order to be prevented.
      We are human,
      We only dancing 💃 🎶 😔 ✨ 🤪 😌 💃
      Please, ignore the meaning.

    • @auburn8833
      @auburn8833 3 роки тому +1

      He literally said its not his fault
      bruh

  • @rinsedpie
    @rinsedpie 3 роки тому +14

    Very modern and very capable tank; i read in a defense analytical site that this Armata will be more than a match from even Abrams SEP. However, Abrams are battle-harden, battle-proven and had done all that a tank is asked to do, so it knows what it is capable of and incapable for.

    • @mochiii608
      @mochiii608 3 роки тому +7

      the Abrams has no advantage over the Armata except availability which is indeed important but due to Armata's crew capsule an Abrams cant even touch them, hideen behind 900mm of composites not including exterior armour, to put in persepective the newest SEPv3 is said to have around 750-800mm of penetration against well....certainly not Relikt Composites and not to mention its Afganit APS which can in theory destroy even APFSDS

    • @jritte1968
      @jritte1968 3 роки тому

      @@mochiii608 How many to be deployed? And when?

    • @lordemarsh6804
      @lordemarsh6804 3 роки тому +15

      The abrams have not fought any modern tanks but very outdated iraqi tanks.... They defeated them due to advanced and superior optics....hardly a situation fit to call battle proven...lol.The leopard and chally would destroy the abrams so fast

    • @jritte1968
      @jritte1968 3 роки тому +3

      @@lordemarsh6804 Way more than advanced and superior optics let the Abrams kick the shit out of those tanks. You’re forgetting the Abrams crews training is second to none. Most countries don’t have the training budget of the US military. That coupled with the new M1A2 SEPv3 means the Abrams can fight and win with any tank.

    • @Cragified
      @Cragified 3 роки тому

      @@mochiii608 T-14 turret is not well protected, you just don't lose the crew when it is penetrated anymore. Puts it on an even footing with most AFVs in the world now. Combat killing it though, not that difficult if it isn't supported well. Same can be said for the M1, Leo 2, Leclerc, etc. Tanks are part of combined arms, tanks alone are always defeated.

  • @ulisesvelez5846
    @ulisesvelez5846 2 роки тому +1

    the t-15 the new infantry combat vehicle. with 30mm automatic cannon.

  • @staytune96
    @staytune96 2 роки тому +1

    those barrel more stable than my income

  • @ronaldedilbertoona3580
    @ronaldedilbertoona3580 3 роки тому +2

    Dalhin ko bukas

  • @user-gg8jy1mx7r
    @user-gg8jy1mx7r Рік тому +1

    Хороший танк!

  • @dickyangkoso8958
    @dickyangkoso8958 3 роки тому +1

    Where are the other videos??

  • @bigboi7817
    @bigboi7817 2 роки тому

    Looks good and the unmanned turret is a great idea considering how many shots Ive seen hit tank turrets. I just doubt that the field of view is enough. you could do a kind of gaming setup with multiple cameras and monitors to increase peripheral vision but that would require a lot of internal space. Remote weapons stations and such have a very restrictive field of view.

    • @trololoev
      @trololoev 11 місяців тому

      They has cameras everywhere

  • @vasudevakotti2894
    @vasudevakotti2894 10 місяців тому +1

    Russia as a country takes at most care to provide compete comfort and safety to the vehicle operators, be it tanks , helicopters or jets.

  • @wifi_soldier5076
    @wifi_soldier5076 Рік тому +1

    5:22 is he referring to the turret 😂😂😂

  • @singaporepatriots3077
    @singaporepatriots3077 3 роки тому +75

    Singapore should start buying defence equipment from Russia. To hell with all the political bureaucracy. If the price is cheaper, and the quality is better than those of their usual counterparts, then why not? We are the tax payers who should also have a say in where and how our money is spent.

    • @wagner_108
      @wagner_108 2 роки тому

      problem is amerika being the b;tch it is, installed puppet govt. wherever it could either by using money or military

    • @DK-gl3ih
      @DK-gl3ih 2 роки тому +6

      You might get sanctioned

    • @AMOUREDD
      @AMOUREDD Рік тому +4

      @@DK-gl3ih might
      No, they will

    • @LAXERJK
      @LAXERJK Рік тому +13

      This aged well lol

    • @SnowAndReef
      @SnowAndReef Рік тому +10

      Look at Ukraine and tell me that Russian tech is superior. Enjoy the discount!