Don't forget about the changed Giganotosaurus Skull. Since it has more in common with Mapusaurus, it got a new more "bulky" Skull Shape and Scientists debunked the insane "long" skull theory of a 1.90m skull, which looks like being used in this Documentary.
So that's what it was called! I used to watch this Doc all the time! I actually thought the mapusaurus were gigas, i guess the narrator calling them giganotosaurs threw me off.
@@ronniepatterson2827 You are right there will probably never be an entirely accurate dinosaur in media, but that doesn't mean we should disregard what we do know.
Great Dinosaur Documentary Accuracy ranking video with that of Dinosaurs Giant of Patagonia and I adore the documentary movie more than Dinosaurs Alive in my opinion. Great Video Red Raptor and hopefully, Dinosaur Revolution, Planet Dinosaur and the abominable Monsters Resurrected on the way on your amazing Dinosaur Documentary Accuracy tier ranking.
I just one to include; although Giganotosaurus did not live with Argentinosaurus, there has been an unnamed sauropod found that is comparable of even bigger in size to argentinosaurus and lived with Giga
I hope you get 1 million subscribers. Your content is out of this world amazing. It as honor to not only youtube, but to dinosaur fans alike. Absolutely outstanding!
T. Rex Autopsy, Real T. Rex and Ice Age Giants. Those are three of my favorite documentaries and I think you should TOTALLY review them. Anyone else with me on this one?
Best of all is that given the foliage i'm pretty sure this documentary was shot IN Patagonia, probably Chile, like the final episode of WWD. Those are araucania trees, which are Chile's national tree IIRC.
@@doctorlechita1865 >what is torres del Paine national park >what is cueva del mylodon Chile has less by virtue of having less area, there are still large portions of patagonia that consist of chile
Great vid so much info i used to be really into dinosaur But then I got out of it but you brought me back but I’m learning a lot and sing some documentaries that I watched as a kid like this one I don’t know what it was called
Although it's still ongoing, and not a documentary, you should totally take a look at the Dinosauria series by Dead Sound. At the very least, it's not super long yet, along with the two episodes so far not being too long, and it's so pretty.
Great review for one of my favoirite dino docs and I'm glad to see you enjoying it and giving it a pretty good score. I feel that there are some positives you missed. -Some more good things about the hunting scenes are little things like some clumsy attacks (especially during the scene where our Mapusaurus protagonist chases the bug, which also makes sense since she is just starting to learn to hunt), the presentation of how any attack could lead to fatal injuries, predators fighting each other mid-hunting, the Mapusauruses attack more like comodo dragons and less like wolves and opportunism and implied cannibalism between the predators at the end. -When the Argentinosaurus protagonist reached adulthood, he was described to be "still growing, but on a slower rate and mostly in width", which is the case for many modern reptiles, so I don't think it's far-fetched to speculate the same thing about dinosaurs. -The absense of grass (you might have implied it when you started talking about the landscape, but I would like it if it was mentioned out loud, although I hope I'm not sounding too demanding). Well, that's all for today. I'm looking forward for the next installment in this review series. See ya!
Actually, the argument for predatory dinosaurs only being able to mob prey and fight over food instead of actually hunting in organized groups is way overblown, ESPECIALLY for Mapusaurus in particular. First of all, we don't actually have any evidence of intraspecific conflict in Mapusaurus in the same way we do with, say, Deinonychus or Allosaurus. Considering just how variable even closely related animals are in behaviour, we should not generalize every single predatory dinosaur as having similar social behaviours. Second, the idea that infighting only allows for uncoordinated mob attacks a la Komodo dragons and makes organized pack hunting akin to wolves impossible is false, as there are living animals that show both infighting AND organized cooperative hunting. For example, crocodilians often get used as an example of how predators with infighting cannot hunt in true cooperative fashion, but they actually do hunt in organized groups part of the time. Pelicans are another good example. So even if Mapusaurus did participate in infighting, that shouldn't be taken as evidence it was unable to hunt in truly organized groups. Third, even predators that can only mob in uncoordinated fashion generally will only start fighting each other over food after the prey has been secured-if the prey gets loose because of infighting, nobody gets to eat, so it's in their best interests to at least not try to kill each other over food until the food is actually available. Fourth, it's actually not possible to prove that intraspecific conflict in the fossil record indicates infighting, because they could just as well be the result of two different groups of the same species fighting (as shown by wolves, lions, etc).
@@bkjeong4302 I never said or implied that pack hunting for the Giganotosaurus is 100% impossible, I just meant it is more possible for them to attack in unorganised mobs based on what we know in regards to other big Theropods and modern reptiles. And considering that most of what we know about Giganotosaurus and what is presented on the documentary (Giganotosauruses are mostly loners, gather in big groups only when Argentinosauruses pass through the area and the hunt ends with cannibalism), I say that the unorganised gang theory is consistent with what is presented about Giganotosaurus in this documentary and in regards to what we generally know. Also, I never said that in-fighting is what caused the unorganised attacks, I simply stated that it is something that could happen during the hunt based on everything I previously presented. All these do not mean that organised pack hunting is an impossibilty, they just mean that it is less of a possibilty than unorganised gangs.
I gotta admit I've seen alot of palaeontology videos reviewing Paleo docs and I gotta say yours is by far the funniest the members definitely give me a chuckle
Will you review Clash of the Dinosaurs? Recently watched it and found it interesting despite some outdated/disproven theories. I’d love to hear your opinion on it!
It will be fun to pick apart, when we get to that of infamous Spinosaurus documentary that makes it into some sort of super monster. Also have you heard about the walking with Dinosaurs animated movie released in 2013? It less of a documentary and more just a normal movie, but there 2 different cuts of the film, one that's called the cretaceous cut that just has Benedict Cumberbatch narrating the film, and theatrical release where all the dinosaurs talked with very very forced in voice-overs.
To be fair to Giganotosaurus, we have dozens of Tyrannosaurus specimens so we have a grester idea of its size, bith Giganotosaurus specimens are in the same size range as an Average Tyrannosaurus. Giganotosaurus exceeded tyrannosaurus in length. Possibly going up to 45 feet but currently the jaw fragment is 12.7 meters. Scotty could *possibly* be 13 meters but we can't know for sure without a measurement of vertabrae. 12.5-12.8 meters is more safe. But i believe both Tyrannosaurus and Giganotosaurus could surpass 13 meters.
I get why they use the "saur" ending... they're trying to make this feel like a regular nature doc, the way we do with modern animals. But in modern animal documentaries, we don't call the animals by their scientific names; we call them by their common names. We talk about lions, not _"panthera leo."_ But there aren't any common names for most animals that were long extinct before we existed. So they can't do that in these movies. Instead, they find a casual, shortened form of the scientific name that can stand in for a common name. "It's a mapusaur" sounds more like a casual name than "it's a _mapusaurus roseae"_ does.
I for one was never confused by “something-saur”, because it is definitely old-hand for the family group not the specific individual species. Allosaur, coleurosaur, ceratosaur are 3 pinnacle examples of that with so many individual species in those clades it hurts.. So yes when they refer to an animal as giganotosaur, know that they were intentionally being vague in leaving off the “us”, about a dubious species still being studied. Trust me I know how they think. If the doco was made today with the same logic, they would call it a carcharodontosaur, doesn’t mean it was the carcharodontosaurus, just a relative.
Yes tyrannosaurus does beat spinosaurus in weight because rex is 8 tons compared to spino wich is 7 tons but Spinosaurus beats trex by size and length trex being 6.1meters while spino is 7 meters. But still good job :)
I think the argentinosaurus nostril placement is also incorrect. they seemed to use the outdated “swamp” nostril on the top of the sauropod’s head instead of nostrils in the front.
They were around the same size. The biggest therapods such as the gigan, T-Rex, etc. were close to the same size. They basically were the size threshold for their kind though technically Spinosaurus was the longest therapod known.
Dont you just love when a docymentary about Cenomanian dinosaurs literally begins in the Oxfordian for the sake of showing their ugly ass oversized Liopleurodon?
Loved this doc as a kid, watched it for the first time in a museum theater. But I can't help but bring up the goofy moment during the mapusaurus pack hunt scene when an argentinosaurus lifts up a mapu off the ground holding onto its foot and yeeting it to the side. There's no way the mapu could have held on to its leg like that, no way the argen could have lifted it off the ground, and absolutely no way it could have yeeted it.
Another interesting documentary, not the best but not the worst either. I enjoyed seeing it the few times I have and it is pretty solid. Good review and grade as always Red Raptor Writes, keep up your informative content, stay safe and have a great day.
Re: pack hunting in theropods, do note that the idea genuine cooperative hunting is restricted to mammals, animals that live in family groups, or to animals that don’t get involved in infighting is false considering that multiple extant animals break one or more of these rules (crocodilians break all three), so the idea these things rule out pack-hunting in theropods is a false dichotomy. Edit: Also, there's a decent chance Mapusaurus lived in family groups seeing as that bonebed included juveniles and adults without a carcass to attract them, and there's (AFAIK) no evidence of infighting either, so even if the last two "rules" actually were valid (which they were not) they would still not be marks against cooperative hunting in Mapusaurus.
Well first off, who could forget the iconic TV spot? "80 million years ago... they ruled the earth. Come and see for the first time, the world's largest animals on the world's largest screen,." Second, surprised you didn't mention the ornithopod Anabisetia, or the pterosaurs Pterodaustro and Anhanguera (who weren't contempoiraries of either mapu or argentino), who also appear Third, also surprised you didn't mention how the argents have their nostrils too high instead of on the snout
80 million years ago? All the charcharodontosaurians were gone at this point. Mapu & Argentino lived about 90 mya. But that’s a problem with the promotional material, not to documentary itself.
I want to make a helpfull suggestion for your future videos that dinosaurs probably didn't roar I don't mean to be rude about its just something you don't mention in your videos I have watched
Could you please review Dino lab it’s on UA-cam and I thought it was really good but I will say you won’t like the T. rex speed but I say they provide a good or ok resin
Actually argentinosaurus was 78 metric tonnes, and there was an estimate in 2016 thats probably outdated at 96 tonnes. You slightly underestimated argentinosaurus's size
My guy keeps saying Giga and Argentinosaurus lived at different times. A quick google search and you can see they lived at the same time, but the Argentinosaurus outlived the Giga by a few million years. Both were around 99.6 - 96 million years ago
Don't forget about the changed Giganotosaurus Skull. Since it has more in common with Mapusaurus, it got a new more "bulky" Skull Shape and Scientists debunked the insane "long" skull theory of a 1.90m skull, which looks like being used in this Documentary.
So that's what it was called! I used to watch this Doc all the time! I actually thought the mapusaurus were gigas, i guess the narrator calling them giganotosaurs threw me off.
Thank you for finally pointing out how heavily built T.Rex is.
I think everyone know how heavily built t recs is
@@ferociousrazordino3581 Not dumbasses who play dino survival games apparently
TF? You DO understand theres no such thing as an accurate Dinosaur, including T-rex, right dumbass?@@thenerdbeast7375
@@ronniepatterson2827 You are right there will probably never be an entirely accurate dinosaur in media, but that doesn't mean we should disregard what we do know.
Agreed. So dont take the latest & "of course" eventually outdated evidence so serious, you call fellow dinosaur lovers dumbasses .@@thenerdbeast7375
3:57 That scared the fossilized shit out of me.
Great Dinosaur Documentary Accuracy ranking video with that of Dinosaurs Giant of Patagonia and I adore the documentary movie more than Dinosaurs Alive in my opinion.
Great Video Red Raptor and hopefully, Dinosaur Revolution, Planet Dinosaur and the abominable Monsters Resurrected on the way on your amazing Dinosaur Documentary Accuracy tier ranking.
" Damnnnn boiiiiii he's THICCCC!!!" 😂😂😂
I wonder if you're gonna cover these documenatries:
- Walking with Cavemen
- Animal Armageddon
.....never....😁
Do monsters we met or wild new world (prehistoric America)
Omg yes
Yes monster we met
Yes monsters we me such a sad miniseries
@@pbh9195 agree
Great choices. I'd like to see some reviews for those two series.
I watched this in IMAX as a kid on a museum field trip! I loved it
I just one to include; although Giganotosaurus did not live with Argentinosaurus, there has been an unnamed sauropod found that is comparable of even bigger in size to argentinosaurus and lived with Giga
Dreagnotus algo asi
I'm going to nickname that unnamed Candeleros titanosaur Proargentinosaurus.
@@jeffreygao3956Ni
That Mapusaurus is amazing ngl, it looks so natural
I know you're doing these in Chronological order, but please can you add The Real T.rex with Chris Packham to your list (2018, BBC 2). Thank you!!
I hope you get 1 million subscribers. Your content is out of this world amazing. It as honor to not only youtube, but to dinosaur fans alike. Absolutely outstanding!
T. Rex Autopsy, Real T. Rex and Ice Age Giants. Those are three of my favorite documentaries and I think you should TOTALLY review them. Anyone else with me on this one?
Best of all is that given the foliage i'm pretty sure this documentary was shot IN Patagonia, probably Chile, like the final episode of WWD. Those are araucania trees, which are Chile's national tree IIRC.
Patagonia is entirely Argentinean, only a few small chunks of dirt are from Chile
@@doctorlechita1865 >what is torres del Paine national park
>what is cueva del mylodon
Chile has less by virtue of having less area, there are still large portions of patagonia that consist of chile
@@thenumbah1birdman Still, Patagonia is mainly part of Argentina and a bit of Chile
@Red Raptor Writes, aren't Charcharodontosaurids basically Allosauroids?
Yes
Great vid so much info i used to be really into dinosaur But then I got out of it but you brought me back but I’m learning a lot and sing some documentaries that I watched as a kid like this one I don’t know what it was called
Although it's still ongoing, and not a documentary, you should totally take a look at the Dinosauria series by Dead Sound. At the very least, it's not super long yet, along with the two episodes so far not being too long, and it's so pretty.
Great review for one of my favoirite dino docs and I'm glad to see you enjoying it and giving it a pretty good score. I feel that there are some positives you missed.
-Some more good things about the hunting scenes are little things like some clumsy attacks (especially during the scene where our Mapusaurus protagonist chases the bug, which also makes sense since she is just starting to learn to hunt), the presentation of how any attack could lead to fatal injuries, predators fighting each other mid-hunting, the Mapusauruses attack more like comodo dragons and less like wolves and opportunism and implied cannibalism between the predators at the end.
-When the Argentinosaurus protagonist reached adulthood, he was described to be "still growing, but on a slower rate and mostly in width", which is the case for many modern reptiles, so I don't think it's far-fetched to speculate the same thing about dinosaurs.
-The absense of grass (you might have implied it when you started talking about the landscape, but I would like it if it was mentioned out loud, although I hope I'm not sounding too demanding).
Well, that's all for today. I'm looking forward for the next installment in this review series. See ya!
Holy f*** you wrote a lot
Actually, the argument for predatory dinosaurs only being able to mob prey and fight over food instead of actually hunting in organized groups is way overblown, ESPECIALLY for Mapusaurus in particular.
First of all, we don't actually have any evidence of intraspecific conflict in Mapusaurus in the same way we do with, say, Deinonychus or Allosaurus. Considering just how variable even closely related animals are in behaviour, we should not generalize every single predatory dinosaur as having similar social behaviours.
Second, the idea that infighting only allows for uncoordinated mob attacks a la Komodo dragons and makes organized pack hunting akin to wolves impossible is false, as there are living animals that show both infighting AND organized cooperative hunting. For example, crocodilians often get used as an example of how predators with infighting cannot hunt in true cooperative fashion, but they actually do hunt in organized groups part of the time. Pelicans are another good example. So even if Mapusaurus did participate in infighting, that shouldn't be taken as evidence it was unable to hunt in truly organized groups.
Third, even predators that can only mob in uncoordinated fashion generally will only start fighting each other over food after the prey has been secured-if the prey gets loose because of infighting, nobody gets to eat, so it's in their best interests to at least not try to kill each other over food until the food is actually available.
Fourth, it's actually not possible to prove that intraspecific conflict in the fossil record indicates infighting, because they could just as well be the result of two different groups of the same species fighting (as shown by wolves, lions, etc).
@@bkjeong4302 I never said or implied that pack hunting for the Giganotosaurus is 100% impossible, I just meant it is more possible for them to attack in unorganised mobs based on what we know in regards to other big Theropods and modern reptiles. And considering that most of what we know about Giganotosaurus and what is presented on the documentary (Giganotosauruses are mostly loners, gather in big groups only when Argentinosauruses pass through the area and the hunt ends with cannibalism), I say that the unorganised gang theory is consistent with what is presented about Giganotosaurus in this documentary and in regards to what we generally know. Also, I never said that in-fighting is what caused the unorganised attacks, I simply stated that it is something that could happen during the hunt based on everything I previously presented.
All these do not mean that organised pack hunting is an impossibilty, they just mean that it is less of a possibilty than unorganised gangs.
I will give it this, the argentinosaurus design in this documentary is much better than the one in chased by dinosaurs.
2:48
I have no words for this scene...
Just. What happened.
Great video, loving this series. If you're looking for more stuff, I recommend Monsters Resurrected, Ice Age Giants, and Last Day of the Dinosaurs
Really enjoying this series! Keep up the great work! Looking forward to you covering Last Day of the Dinosaurs from Discovery.
"I do my best to research before writing a script" So more than half these "documentary" writers
It hurts my soulmate when people use the inaccurate Giga skull
This man is everything i hoped for in a dinosaur channel
These reviews are hilarious. Keep it up
These videos are never disappointing
I don’t like Jurassic fight club
Sea Monsters A Prehistoric Adventure?
I gotta admit I've seen alot of palaeontology videos reviewing Paleo docs and I gotta say yours is by far the funniest the members definitely give me a chuckle
Do plan to review Tarbosaurus the mightiest ever, The Lost Dinosaurs of New Zealand and Egypt, Dino lab, and what killed the megabeasts 🔥💯
Will you review Clash of the Dinosaurs? Recently watched it and found it interesting despite some outdated/disproven theories. I’d love to hear your opinion on it!
He reviewed it 6 months ago, and it’s terrible.
I remember seeing this one in a museum as a kid!
I have a very soft spot for this doc, i actually got to watch it on IMAX as a kid
It will be fun to pick apart, when we get to that of infamous Spinosaurus documentary that makes it into some sort of super monster.
Also have you heard about the walking with Dinosaurs animated movie released in 2013? It less of a documentary and more just a normal movie, but there 2 different cuts of the film, one that's called the cretaceous cut that just has Benedict Cumberbatch narrating the film, and theatrical release where all the dinosaurs talked with very very forced in voice-overs.
Spoiler: The Spinosaurus episode was one of only 2 episodes that were bad. The other 4 were easily C/B level.
Absolutely amazing stuff. Can't believe more people aren't showing love, you deserve it my dude
To be fair to Giganotosaurus, we have dozens of Tyrannosaurus specimens so we have a grester idea of its size, bith Giganotosaurus specimens are in the same size range as an Average Tyrannosaurus. Giganotosaurus exceeded tyrannosaurus in length. Possibly going up to 45 feet but currently the jaw fragment is 12.7 meters. Scotty could *possibly* be 13 meters but we can't know for sure without a measurement of vertabrae. 12.5-12.8 meters is more safe. But i believe both Tyrannosaurus and Giganotosaurus could surpass 13 meters.
i had a question: who will win mapu or giga i think mapu cuz it evolved from it and would have been more specialiad i cheer up for mapu
i was wondering if you can do a Dino Documentary on the BBC series Wild New World "prehistoric America"
What the fuck dude my ears. Was that GET EM BOI needed? ?
I can't get over on how badly you pronounced "Scipionyx"...
never watched it, but I heard its great
I used to think Gigonatosaurus was Gigonatosaurus for YEARS. I only found out after watching Dominion ;-;
Loving the series. You need to hurry up and get to Dino death match, can't wait to get your take on it
I get why they use the "saur" ending... they're trying to make this feel like a regular nature doc, the way we do with modern animals. But in modern animal documentaries, we don't call the animals by their scientific names; we call them by their common names. We talk about lions, not _"panthera leo."_
But there aren't any common names for most animals that were long extinct before we existed. So they can't do that in these movies. Instead, they find a casual, shortened form of the scientific name that can stand in for a common name. "It's a mapusaur" sounds more like a casual name than "it's a _mapusaurus roseae"_ does.
Because Latin name are cool
Could you please do Prehistoric Predators (2007)? I realise this is a little late to ask, sorry, I forgot about it when I made my initial suggestion.
I mean T. rex as the largest predator ever. It’s old news
I for one was never confused by “something-saur”, because it is definitely old-hand for the family group not the specific individual species. Allosaur, coleurosaur, ceratosaur are 3 pinnacle examples of that with so many individual species in those clades it hurts.. So yes when they refer to an animal as giganotosaur, know that they were intentionally being vague in leaving off the “us”, about a dubious species still being studied. Trust me I know how they think. If the doco was made today with the same logic, they would call it a carcharodontosaur, doesn’t mean it was the carcharodontosaurus, just a relative.
Yes tyrannosaurus does beat spinosaurus in weight because rex is 8 tons compared to spino wich is 7 tons but Spinosaurus beats trex by size and length trex being 6.1meters while spino is 7 meters. But still good job :)
Meters? Tyrannosaurus is 12 meters, and Spinosaurus is 15 meters.
@@maxrichards3881 wrong Tyrannosaurus length 12-13 meters long spino length 13,3-14 meters long little difference
@@rodrigopinto6676
Why respond to me, and not the person I was responding too, who got the numbers even more wrong?
@@maxrichards3881 currently maximum estimated for an adult spinosausus is only 14 meters long.
@@rodrigopinto6676
What happened to 15 meters?
Ahh I think the Audio is not available for this one?
Man, I remember this. I saw it on IMAX at the natural history museum in DC
I remembered the story being about giganotosauruses rather than mapusaures.
I think the argentinosaurus nostril placement is also incorrect. they seemed to use the outdated “swamp” nostril on the top of the sauropod’s head instead of nostrils in the front.
By the way did you know there is a book called ‘raptor red’?
For Patagontitan it seems to be the most complete, and I thought Australotitan was more largest Australian dinosaur
I’ve done my waiting, 12 years of it!
Do animal Armageddon
So far there is an isolated Zuchengtyrannus Vertebrae that might be 15% bigger than Scotty the T-Rex
I was looking at the size comparisons he showed in the vid and theropods in general look pretty small compared to a person
Review a dinosaur revolution
Public media: Giganotosaurus is bigger than T. rex.
T. rex: LIES!
They were around the same size. The biggest therapods such as the gigan, T-Rex, etc. were close to the same size. They basically were the size threshold for their kind though technically Spinosaurus was the longest therapod known.
@@etinarcadiaego7424 rex is the biggest or largest
Dont you just love when a docymentary about Cenomanian dinosaurs literally begins in the Oxfordian for the sake of showing their ugly ass oversized Liopleurodon?
Loved this doc as a kid, watched it for the first time in a museum theater. But I can't help but bring up the goofy moment during the mapusaurus pack hunt scene when an argentinosaurus lifts up a mapu off the ground holding onto its foot and yeeting it to the side. There's no way the mapu could have held on to its leg like that, no way the argen could have lifted it off the ground, and absolutely no way it could have yeeted it.
Another interesting documentary, not the best but not the worst either. I enjoyed seeing it the few times I have and it is pretty solid. Good review and grade as always Red Raptor Writes, keep up your informative content, stay safe and have a great day.
First pin this
I can't wait for your Review of Monster ressurect
It's gonna be hilarious
I have a feelint 8r's next
Dang, the nostalgia!
Re: pack hunting in theropods, do note that the idea genuine cooperative hunting is restricted to mammals, animals that live in family groups, or to animals that don’t get involved in infighting is false considering that multiple extant animals break one or more of these rules (crocodilians break all three), so the idea these things rule out pack-hunting in theropods is a false dichotomy.
Edit: Also, there's a decent chance Mapusaurus lived in family groups seeing as that bonebed included juveniles and adults without a carcass to attract them, and there's (AFAIK) no evidence of infighting either, so even if the last two "rules" actually were valid (which they were not) they would still not be marks against cooperative hunting in Mapusaurus.
Giant Liopleurodon, of all of the mistakes to bring back...
Well first off, who could forget the iconic TV spot?
"80 million years ago... they ruled the earth. Come and see for the first time, the world's largest animals on the world's largest screen,."
Second, surprised you didn't mention the ornithopod Anabisetia, or the pterosaurs Pterodaustro and Anhanguera (who weren't contempoiraries of either mapu or argentino), who also appear
Third, also surprised you didn't mention how the argents have their nostrils too high instead of on the snout
80 million years ago? All the charcharodontosaurians were gone at this point. Mapu & Argentino lived about 90 mya. But that’s a problem with the promotional material, not to documentary itself.
One of my favorite movie documentary films
I hope & pray to visit Patagonia someday so I can see the museums of these giants.
I want you to review Animal Armageddon in the near future. That is an awful documentary with B-movie level CGI.
I saw this at Carowinds, I think... 🤔🤔🧐
Do dinosaurs of Antarctica
Giganotosaurus is the best!!!
T.rex no!!!
i knew it. sauropods are THICC :)
I want to make a helpfull suggestion for your future videos that dinosaurs probably didn't roar I don't mean to be rude about its just something you don't mention in your videos I have watched
I remember the imax adds for this god I wanted to see it
Amphicoelias is the largest dino to date (40-60m long)
Do you even hear yourself?
Long. It’s the LONGEST dinosaur.
Argentinosaurus was much more Massive.
Amphicoelias literally doesn't exist
Did you notice the proneded wrists
Remind me again how this channel doesn’t have 10k+ subs?
The best Dino doc in my opinion is Dino death math and t rex the ultimate survivor
One fact when I was at the Perot Museum I saw an advertisement for this documentary
Second
I have no idea what the hell you did with your intro but holly shit its hilarious
I love it!
Would it have made more sense to replace Liopleurodon in the documentary with Pliosaurus?
No. The largest estimate for pliosaurus funkei was 16 meters. 9 meters shorter than the fake Liopleurodon.
Please, make review on Dinosaur revolution!
I have sound, just fyi
Do you plan on reviewing the Animal Armageddon series?
Could you please review Dino lab it’s on UA-cam and I thought it was really good but I will say you won’t like the T. rex speed but I say they provide a good or ok resin
Actually argentinosaurus was 78 metric tonnes, and there was an estimate in 2016 thats probably outdated at 96 tonnes. You slightly underestimated argentinosaurus's size
Gotta do Monsters Resurrected and Planet Dinosaur.
trex is confirmed to have feathers
An animal that large would not have a feather covering unless it lived in a cold environment.
@@etinarcadiaego7424
(Smiles in Nanuqsaurus)
Not really confirmed but still up for debate until further findings. You'd still be right either way.
Do you do only dinosaur related videos or are you interested in cenozoic megafauna and their documentaries?
He did walking with beast and monsters so no he doesn't just do dinosaur content.
He does all
From what I've been hearing, the compsognathid to hatchling carnosaur paper really doesn't hold to scrutiny.
Finally some proof that i didnt see this in some random dream.
My guy keeps saying Giga and Argentinosaurus lived at different times. A quick google search and you can see they lived at the same time, but the Argentinosaurus outlived the Giga by a few million years. Both were around 99.6 - 96 million years ago
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giganotosaurus
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentinosaurus
1 million years they lived together.
Valley Of The T-Rex The Literal Punching Bag Of This Channel