Hello Cody, I have a recommendation that would likely work better. Instead of boiling water using a torch and sending steam into the carbon, send the torch flame directly into the tube that goes into the furnace. The exhaust of a properly tuned torch has a huge amount of water vapor in it, and some carbon dioxide, while containing little to no oxygen. Propane is C3H8; when fully combusted, each propane molecule results in four water molecules and three carbon dioxide molecules. Both carbon dioxide and water vapor will carry out reduction reactions that pit the charcoal and increase its surface area; hot carbon dioxide gives up one of its oxygens upon striking charcoal, resulting in two carbon monoxides. Reduction reactions are way more efficient at higher temperatures, and the exhaust of a torch is far hotter than the steam you were using. I work at a micro-scale biomass gasifier company. The charcoal produced by our reactors passes through a 600-800˚C reduction zone, and was lab tested to have 496 m^2 of surface area per gram. Try using the torch flame itself as the source of the reduction gases. Insulate the tube that feeds your reaction chamber; the hotter the gases, the more efficiently the reduction occurs. Since all the reduction reactions are endothermic, making the gas hotter gives it more energy to carry out the reduction reactions.
Wanted to learn to do this today and kept finding people echoing the steps in a way that I know can't work, then I see Cody, and am grateful someone I can trust to do it right has. ❤
I was searching for a DIY activated carbon recipe and most of the content I saw was nonsense. This video was 100x better than anything else out there. Now I actually understand what the heck activated carbon is, and how to make it. Awesome content. Subscribed. :)
Yes, Cody is really good at explaining and demonstrating even complicated stuff in a way anyone can understand. And always in a communicative good mood :)
How to turn 20 min video into 30 unwatchable with ads. Great job cody. Respect to your knowledge though Shame for the moneyhunger you clearly dont need.
Cody, this is one of the best videos you have ever produced!!!! You have used stoichiometry and mass balance in the past, but this was a true experiment, showing the difference between a control and three different test substances. Each step, including the screening of particle size was well planned out. It also has very practical real-world applications. For example, the Keurig that sits on my countertop has an activated carbon filter to remove taste-related chemicals prior to brewing. Thanks for a really excellent video!
The production of CO and H2 during this process reminds me of the previous method by which H2 gas was mass produced, by passing steam over red-hot iron. The oxygen from the H2O combines with Fe, thus liberating H2. Over 240 years ago, Antoine Lavoisier used this method to help prove the conservation of mass in chemical reactions and to pioneer the concept of stoichiometry.
Super memories here. My first job was with a company making smokeless fuel. Our lab did everything from tar-analysis to pollution measurement to weather-recording (wind direction records were used to measure dust-particle fallout from chimneys). That was all back in the 70s when virtually everything was gravimetric. Weighing scales, the ones that used counterweights and burettes were daily tools. Titration of multiple samples was incredibly boring but more than compensated for with our sample collecting. Taking water samples from rivers included measuring its flowrate. Dust sampling units were scattered over a wide area and the wind-direction data allowed us to map the deposition rates. This video mentioned water-gas. We produced a good amount of that and its a rare thing to hear about. I loved that work and the people that did it.
I still consider this one of the best science videos on youtube. I've worked with charcoal and biochar for a few years and this was when I first saw it last year and still is the best analysis of charcoal or activated carbon out there. Thanks for doing this stuff dude.
I really like this hands-on approach to explaining how the process works on a microscopic level. It makes the explanation intuitive without leaving out important details such as the effect of kinetics and impurities on the reaction.
Big piece of advice on making this product. When sifting run a magnet though the powder. This will remove metals. Use this especially if buying store bought charcoal. It will pick up rust and sometimes through the process of manufacturers a decent amount of metals can get into the charcoal since it is is compressed powdered charcoal you never really know what's in it. If your magnet picks up a lot of metals scrap it and start over.
After seeing several videos on "making" activated charcoal, it seems not one had an idea of what the heck the process involves. But this guy here knows what the hell he is doing. Subscribed.
Cody. the reason i come back is that you are the only person i find saying things like, 'and keep in mind there may be significant margin of error here, but it was at least comparable'. humble skill is rare, and so is integrity. you sir are a fine example of both
New? There's nothing new about this video. Maybe you haven't been watching Cody's videos for very long. Because the past couple of years, he's gotten lazy. He doesn't put out videos, and the ones he does are short. I don't know WTF he's doing, or why he's not been doing more/longer videos. This is the first like this in a while.
Cody, have you ever thought about planting morel mushroom spores around your garden? Considering the advances made in cultivation and its sale price of 80 dollars a pound it would be interesting. The yard you have looks ideal for it. EDIT: the yard at your house. Not so good at the ranch unless you're there almost every day in the spring.
I've been trying to find a good way to make that. So thank you that I came across your video on this. I was close to just stop trying. You can can get a new paint can with the lid, put really small holes in the lid like 2 or 3 in center of lid and put it in the middle of your bon fire or pit fire to make your own biochar. If I want a lot more I just go over to my brother's place and he makes gallons of it at a time. It takes him around 4 to 5 hours to make a big batch. He uses I for his gardens and his fruit trees and stuff along with dissolved fish water. His stuff grows fast and bigger than the weeds can do. Lol.
Good job Cody! I give you some tips. 1) the woodbased charcoal developes normally a small surface without activating agent by self gasification. You have made what is called "physical activation" with steam but can be done also with carbon dioxide. During the carbonization is developed some CO2 that self activate the carbon to some extent. Different pore size distribution by the way you normally obtain with CO2 generating more micropores while steam as you described in the plastiline examples favors the production of mesopores (2
this is why activated carbon is important for hand/toewarmers for skiing and for filters. the surface area is so great one grain has the surface area of a tennis court. this is why it is a very effective filter.
Before you decide to ingest any of this activated carbon, I strongly suggest that you sent it to a lab to have it tested for PAH content. PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) hare the carcinogenic tars, and they are quite toxic. You should make sure that the activated charcoal you use does not have this stuff in it before you ingest any.
Always wondered what made activated carbon activated carbon I was going to Google it but I kept pushing it off and procrastinating for no real reason and then I saw this video I'm glad I learned it here instead of just on Google
Basically my view towards any other scientific topic, googling it yourself often times causes more questions than answers, thus causing more confusion and more procrastination the next time you try to google something similar
When titrating iodine it pays to use starch as an indicator. The change from dark blue to colourless makes the endpoint much clearer than the slow fading out of yellow you were dealing with. This would also be much clearer on camera. Nonetheless, good work as always!
In one of the “hidden” videos I flashed links for I used starch but I did not notice an increase in accuracy so I omitted it for the final. I always try to reduce instructions as much as possible.
@@theCodyReeder Hidden videos? All this sneaky business! :-D The unnoticeable difference in accuracy may be related to the relatively high concentration of the thiosulphate solution used in the titration. 0.7mL is quite a small volume to be titrating with a burette of that size, so I still think starch would help if the precision of your measurement was of greater importance. But of course, you did it and it worked to demonstrate the efficacy of your homemade product! I really love your work and I'm only a teeny bit jealous that with my urban location in Germany it would be exceedingly difficult for me to get away with even half of the experiments that you carry out! Someday I'd like to post a few practical science videos of my own but selecting the subject matter is proving a little tricky, for the above reason.
@@AguaFluorida you forgot that starch isn't an optimal indicator, it uses up "a lot" of thiosulpate for it to change color: to have a more noticeable change in color than the yellow-transparent in the video you have to add some mL of starch solution, in a reaction that only uses only 0.7 mL of (S2O3)2- solution it can cause an increase up to 0.5mL, with an enormous error! In fact it said to add starch only at the end of the titration to be able to see a little better the final part of the change, if you add it at the beginning it uses up reagents
To bend metal tubing, securely close the 1 end, tightly pack the cavity with fine sand & seal the other end too. Now you can bend the tubing without having the tube cave in on itself. You can even saturate the sand with a soap water solution to reduce the friction - which will result in a smoother, more uniform bend.
How did you super heat the steam ?. I'm assuming with the electric coils inside?, Would it be any better to superheat the steam in that tube before it hits the charcoal?. Like that's a wrap that tube with a heater coil?
@@theCodyReeder I heard people fill the tubes with sand to keep the tube from collapsing and heard others freezing water inside the tube so its ice to keep it from collapsing when bending it.
What if an iron tube is filled with very fine inert powder, an induction heater is used, and normal steam is passed into the apparatus? It could be bent into an u-shape to facilitate that. Would that be able to superheat the steam?
I like how you explain the pores using the clay, and the experiment process. Even someone who's really bad with chemistry could understand. If my highschool teacher can explain things your way (clay is not expensive!) I would probably not fail my chemistry (and science) in high school!
It's not clear if it's actually better, due to limited accuracy of measurement of weights and volumes. He said that in the video, mentioning error bars.
fine dust wouldn't get channels to allow sht you need to react to go through. it will act like a surface of one brick. for swallowing it should be not effective too because you need the pieces to stay and work in your stomach for a longer time.
Cody, it is worthwhile taking precautions regarding lungs, eyes, ears, kidneys and bladder since the problems from toxic exposure usually appear in later years when you are presented with your great grand-children. Such a loss of your presence at this time is a repeating tragedy around the world. Please do everything you can to break this scenario. Thank you for sharing Cody, very enjoyable demonstrations of possibilities.
I think you also found another way to further increase the yield of a wood gasifier. You get charcoal as a byproduct. The amount of charcoal is a limiting factor of your syngas production. If you find a more efficient way to do this process, you could theoretically increase the yeilds of bio-reactors.
@@marcpp if what they say is correct, it's just going to be as humid as the surrounding atmosphere. So freezer drying should work imo if it stayed sealed
Indra Verhoeven; do you know what asbestos is? they don’t use it much anymore but breathing asbestos dust causes mesothelioma. charcoal dust is bad too. it’s worse than just regular organic dust that the immune system can break down.
Hey Cody, you can fill the tube with table salt instead of tin, I did it myself and vouch for it.. I think much easier to do it that way, I learned it from someone who made copper coil for distilleries
I have the same activated charcoal. I have always wanted to see a DIY approach to making your own and how it compares to normal lump charcoal. This video helped answer a lot of questions I had. Thank you.
"You'd much rather eat 10g of activated carbon than 1kg of charcoal." A while back, I ran some numbers, and based on the LD50 for rats, 0.5kg of charcoal is the LD50 for a typical adult. So yes, I would much rather eat 10g of activated carbon than twice the median lethal dose for an adult human.
Normally, I'd be concerned that someone would use this info for bad things, but I'm doubtful someone could force themselves to consume even a half kilo of charcoal at once, much less a full kilo. Besides, Cody literally drank cyanide once.
Your charcoal burn failed? Oof. It's been years since you did it, but if you haven't figured out a good way or if anyone else here needs one..❤ - Get (unused) paint cans with lids. - Punch a tiny hole in the lid, 1-2mm (this is your wood gas exhaust). - Load them with the target material. - Lids on tight. - Make a campfire. - Toss the cans on the fire with the vent holes pointing upward. - When gas starts exiting the cans the process has begun, wait until this stops*. * For extra fun, light the wood gas stream on fire. Sometime I wanna try harvesting it to store somehow.
If you don't want to go through the hassle of using tin for bending you can also fill the tubing with sand, it works great and you can pour it right out when you're done. Great video btw!
Cody, great videos... but take better care of your lungs... because you're constantly working with dust, you'll eventually get COPD without diligent use of a dust mask.
Never seen any video like this one clearly showing how to make activated carbon out of the industry and well, to prove it with a amazing test. Thannnnnnnnk you !
@@user-df5is8jy6n Well; the flamable gas that is produced from the reaction, instead of just being burnt for the heck of it, could be used to keep the kettle heated instead of using the torch. So it would be a full circle production with "minimal" startup. The heated steam produces flammable gas from reaction with charcoal, said gas is used to keep the kettle heated, which then continues the reaction and so on :)
@@TheMols14 really, so it was for economic consideration? my hypothesis was, once the syngas produced from the reaction of steam and charcoal, the steam would only lower the overall temperature. i mean steam around a 100C, while syngas combustion would be higher than that i suppose. what do you think?
@@TheMols14 It wouldn't work without at least a little help from an external source, considering it dies down after some time. Would be interesting to see it done, though 🤔 Maybe it would balance out?
@@TheMols14 You could only use the exhaust to help heat it, not to heat by itself, otherwise that would be perpetual energy. The kettle is the fuel tank for the CO and H mixture which requires a heat source. Boiling the water, the reacting the charcoal, etc. takes energy away from the equation, meaning that the energy returned would be rapidly diminishing every time you went from steam to flame to steam again.
There is rational for using activated charcoal for teeth whitening - it may help absorb discolorations in your tooth enamel. Activated charcoal has been anecdotally seen to whiten teeth, but use extreme care when brushing the substance onto your teeth.
Hi, captavating videos Cody, you most likely figured out by now the particals flying round at... 12:00 mins are actually the lining of the can,. Factory puts acrylic, polyester lining in cans to prevent rust activation and promotes longevity and sterile conditions.. anyway thanks for the videos Cody.. cool stuff... Thom in Scotland.
@3:20 CODY: "this much charcoal wouldn't even fit in your stomach...". INTERNET: "HOLD MY BEER!" MORNING NEWS: "A crazy new challenge sweeping the internet, The charcoal challenge, where people try and ingest a kilo if charcoal". ME: 🤔😢🤣😂
* Sam Ferguson 9 months ago "You'd much rather eat 10g of activated carbon than 1kg of charcoal." A while back, I ran some numbers, and based on the LD50 for rats, 0.5kg of charcoal is the LD50 for a typical adult. So yes, I would much rather eat 10g of activated carbon than twice the median lethal dose for an adult human."
Haha, "Will it blend?" comes from right here in Orem, and several years ago I shot a little video for that guy, Tom Dickson, at the nearby grocery store (Macey's)!
a master titration tip- spin the handle 180 degrees as fast as you can. Play with it and you can zoom in on the perfect amount. once you get it, everyone will get the same blank value.
Activated carbon is generally known to be less effective or even unsuitable. You want some residual hydrocarbons for the optimal/highest reactivity. There are certainly different varieties of activated charcoal (with different chemical composition and surface area/structure), that might act differently, but for the most part it's more pure carbon, that is less reactive. You would normally grind the charcoal as fine as possible anyways, so surface area should not differ that much afterwards either. So you could use it, but probably won't get better results, than with specially suited charcoal (wood type, pyrolysis conditions, particle size). It mainly will produce a much slower, more sparkly effect. As incorporating sulfur into charcoal improves performance, it could be interesting to investigate, wether one could infuse activated charcoal more easily with sulfur in solution. But that would never be practical. The main goals of BP are to be cheap, easily ignitable and reliable at various performance levels.
Cody. Did you do an experiment with wood gasification yet . And if you decide to do it could you run a small engine off the fuel. Do it your way ,so it makes sense. Thank you for good science,chemistry,physics,baking .so forth.
I'd bet that a significant factor in the density change between the untreated control versus the treated sample and heated sample is due to some sneaky fluids added to the commercial charcoal to help it burn. Putting it through the furnace either drove off the lighter fluid or cooked it down to carbon.
Hello Cody,
I have a recommendation that would likely work better. Instead of boiling water using a torch and sending steam into the carbon, send the torch flame directly into the tube that goes into the furnace. The exhaust of a properly tuned torch has a huge amount of water vapor in it, and some carbon dioxide, while containing little to no oxygen. Propane is C3H8; when fully combusted, each propane molecule results in four water molecules and three carbon dioxide molecules. Both carbon dioxide and water vapor will carry out reduction reactions that pit the charcoal and increase its surface area; hot carbon dioxide gives up one of its oxygens upon striking charcoal, resulting in two carbon monoxides. Reduction reactions are way more efficient at higher temperatures, and the exhaust of a torch is far hotter than the steam you were using.
I work at a micro-scale biomass gasifier company. The charcoal produced by our reactors passes through a 600-800˚C reduction zone, and was lab tested to have 496 m^2 of surface area per gram. Try using the torch flame itself as the source of the reduction gases. Insulate the tube that feeds your reaction chamber; the hotter the gases, the more efficiently the reduction occurs. Since all the reduction reactions are endothermic, making the gas hotter gives it more energy to carry out the reduction reactions.
Holy shit, you are too over qualified to comment
@@miceskin
he's not...
Ask him what his favourite atom is.?
Wow I am your 5th subscriber! When you get big remember me!!
Awesome tip from someone with domain knowledge - thanks!
Thank you.
Cody has done some crazy unpleasant stuff for the channel, but a titration? Willingly? What a madman!
It's worse than that: *Four* titrations.
[unpleasant memories of highschool labs intensify]
Titration is just a massive pain. Crucial yes but UGGGGGHHHHHHH
That's sorta why we love him!
He is a madlad
all codes found in the video:
aYeFTCWplkE
04co79X56dE
FgJZA7c7Z9c
Z79W0PkJzQ0
WbCjPLGcM_k
They are all unlisted videos with additional content.
Legend, thanks Paul!
I came to the comments just for this. :)
Yay, I was right and thx for all the codes. That would have been almost impossible to get on mobile
And here I thought they were chemical compounds.
I just did not take the time to read any, or I would have known that was not the case.
Where did you find them?
Wanted to learn to do this today and kept finding people echoing the steps in a way that I know can't work, then I see Cody, and am grateful someone I can trust to do it right has. ❤
I was searching for a DIY activated carbon recipe and most of the content I saw was nonsense. This video was 100x better than anything else out there. Now I actually understand what the heck activated carbon is, and how to make it. Awesome content. Subscribed. :)
Yes, Cody is really good at explaining and demonstrating even complicated stuff in a way anyone can understand. And always in a communicative good mood :)
Ads are making this unwatchable.
Cant cody do without the 50€ a month he gets for being annoying?
How to turn 20 min video into 30 unwatchable with ads. Great job cody.
Respect to your knowledge though
Shame for the moneyhunger you clearly dont need.
Un Fuckin Watchable
@@Derederi why are you so whiny and how have you never heard of an adblocker
You perform the most sketchy yet professional experiments
So true, especially anything with mercury...
@Forsworn He knows what he is doing, don't worry.
@@InXLsisDeo nah he does what he's knowing
Retrograde Beats the only thing different between goofing around and science is writing it down - Adam Savage
InXLsisDeo thats a strawman
Cody, this is one of the best videos you have ever produced!!!! You have used stoichiometry and mass balance in the past, but this was a true experiment, showing the difference between a control and three different test substances. Each step, including the screening of particle size was well planned out.
It also has very practical real-world applications. For example, the Keurig that sits on my countertop has an activated carbon filter to remove taste-related chemicals prior to brewing.
Thanks for a really excellent video!
The production of CO and H2 during this process reminds me of the previous method by which H2 gas was mass produced, by passing steam over red-hot iron. The oxygen from the H2O combines with Fe, thus liberating H2. Over 240 years ago, Antoine Lavoisier used this method to help prove the conservation of mass in chemical reactions and to pioneer the concept of stoichiometry.
thallok replacing my Keurig charcoal was what actually made me watch this video lol
Can you make more vids of the sealed terrarium you made ?
Cheeki breeki
Cheeki beeki
Cheesy breadi
Cheeki breeki
Soyuz nerushimy respublik svobonykh splotila naveki velaka Rus
Super memories here. My first job was with a company making smokeless fuel. Our lab did everything from tar-analysis to pollution measurement to weather-recording (wind direction records were used to measure dust-particle fallout from chimneys). That was all back in the 70s when virtually everything was gravimetric. Weighing scales, the ones that used counterweights and burettes were daily tools.
Titration of multiple samples was incredibly boring but more than compensated for with our sample collecting. Taking water samples from rivers included measuring its flowrate. Dust sampling units were scattered over a wide area and the wind-direction data allowed us to map the deposition rates.
This video mentioned water-gas. We produced a good amount of that and its a rare thing to hear about.
I loved that work and the people that did it.
That's going into details!
Triple beams are a fond memory of my chem classes before they remodeled and I'm not even 25 haha
I still consider this one of the best science videos on youtube. I've worked with charcoal and biochar for a few years and this was when I first saw it last year and still is the best analysis of charcoal or activated carbon out there. Thanks for doing this stuff dude.
3:15 "Accidentally ingest a poison..."
OH BOY! A crazy video coming soon!
Cody has already built up an immunity to all poisons so not sure why he'd need the activated charcoal
@@jonathangrey2183 Poison needs activated charcoal to save itself from Cody
@@jonathangrey2183 Never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line!
@@bonjourmssr nope! We will try to save your tookus!
Every substance is a poison, don't forget that.
Cody, I just wanted to express my appreciation for your videos. I always learn something
I love this so much
Not just a method of how to make activated carbon
But also a test to find exactly how activated it is
I really like this hands-on approach to explaining how the process works on a microscopic level.
It makes the explanation intuitive without leaving out important details such as the effect of kinetics and impurities on the reaction.
Big piece of advice on making this product.
When sifting run a magnet though the powder. This will remove metals. Use this especially if buying store bought charcoal. It will pick up rust and sometimes through the process of manufacturers a decent amount of metals can get into the charcoal since it is is compressed powdered charcoal you never really know what's in it. If your magnet picks up a lot of metals scrap it and start over.
A magnet will only pick up some metals.
Touches mercury with bare hands, touches charcoal with gloves
yes charcoal makes your hands black and metal mercury is not really that poisonous and rolls off your skin
You gotta have your priorities...
Jayko30 Christ, leave me alone. I just want likes
@Ungregistered User r/iamverysmart
Two sets of gloves.
Me: going to sleep
Cody: upload a video
Me: no i'm not
What time zone are you in
r/nosleep
And here I am nine hours later. It's 2:30 am and I must be up at 6 am. This is not time lost, tis lessons gained.
@@tterryshenanigans1820 Look up the 5 hour rule. You are just taking the advice of legends.
@@alklazaris3741 thanks that was rather refreshing, I've never heard of it before but apparently I'm a natural.
Really like the clay model, Really good for visualizing the actual reaction.
@G W Pardon?
After seeing several videos on "making" activated charcoal, it seems not one had an idea of what the heck the process involves. But this guy here knows what the hell he is doing. Subscribed.
Cody. the reason i come back is that you are the only person i find saying things like, 'and keep in mind there may be significant margin of error here, but it was at least comparable'. humble skill is rare, and so is integrity. you sir are a fine example of both
Loving that new format, more explaining, nicely done!
Is it new?
Jesus Christ, I haven’t seen that image in what feels like a millennia.
@@Internetzspacezshipz millennium* millennia is plural.
@@EctoMorpheus shut up
New? There's nothing new about this video. Maybe you haven't been watching Cody's videos for very long. Because the past couple of years, he's gotten lazy. He doesn't put out videos, and the ones he does are short. I don't know WTF he's doing, or why he's not been doing more/longer videos. This is the first like this in a while.
Cody, have you ever thought about planting morel mushroom spores around your garden? Considering the advances made in cultivation and its sale price of 80 dollars a pound it would be interesting. The yard you have looks ideal for it.
EDIT: the yard at your house. Not so good at the ranch unless you're there almost every day in the spring.
Thanks for the kindergarten visual explanation for us plebeians
@100% Drunk yes even if you're 100% drunk. he still makes it understandable lol
feynman method
It's made for Americans with no education, so basically for all.
Explaining charcoal using clay, did Cody want the audience to react?
Cody should become a science teacher
I've been trying to find a good way to make that. So thank you that I came across your video on this. I was close to just stop trying. You can can get a new paint can with the lid, put really small holes in the lid like 2 or 3 in center of lid and put it in the middle of your bon fire or pit fire to make your own biochar. If I want a lot more I just go over to my brother's place and he makes gallons of it at a time. It takes him around 4 to 5 hours to make a big batch. He uses I for his gardens and his fruit trees and stuff along with dissolved fish water. His stuff grows fast and bigger than the weeds can do. Lol.
love seeing an age old gen chem lab actually being used for real world testing. great work
Holy crap, the first time I've seen anyone titrate anything since my High School chemistry class. So it wasn't just a cruel prank!
I HATED that shit Titration is the WORST
LMAO
Commercial labs use it a lot, to the point of having machines that do it automatically.
(They break down a lot)
At least your class actually taught Chemistry and not just Atomic Theory and Molecular nomenclature.
Good job Cody! I give you some tips. 1) the woodbased charcoal developes normally a small surface without activating agent by self gasification. You have made what is called "physical activation" with steam but can be done also with carbon dioxide. During the carbonization is developed some CO2 that self activate the carbon to some extent. Different pore size distribution by the way you normally obtain with CO2 generating more micropores while steam as you described in the plastiline examples favors the production of mesopores (2
davide can u suggest a simple and efficient method in detail, want to make activated carbon fabric at home, ( if possible)
davide can u upload a flowchart or something please man.
Cody: touches mercury with bare hands, draws diagrams with gloves
I mean, have you ever tried washing marker off your hands? its annoying
Cody : *has box of radioactive materials*
Also Cody : butter is my kryptonite
@@onyxguardian1756 Alcohol, even hand sanitizer will remove pen ink.
@@davidgalbraith1840
Twas a joke, about how he will handle (potentially) dangerous materials bare handed, yet wear gloves for handling a marker.
It's because he can handle one mercury, but the marker is made of two mercuries. Add a whiteboard to the mix, and we have even more mercuries.
this is why activated carbon is important for hand/toewarmers for skiing and for filters. the surface area is so great one grain has the surface area of a tennis court. this is why it is a very effective filter.
Before you decide to ingest any of this activated carbon, I strongly suggest that you sent it to a lab to have it tested for PAH content. PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) hare the carcinogenic tars, and they are quite toxic. You should make sure that the activated charcoal you use does not have this stuff in it before you ingest any.
Maybe that's why they say using coconut shell AC is the best for ingestion?
Is it worse than smoking CIGARETTES?!
Always wondered what made activated carbon activated carbon I was going to Google it but I kept pushing it off and procrastinating for no real reason and then I saw this video I'm glad I learned it here instead of just on Google
nice run on sentence
Liam Corder run-on
I did google it before but Cody explained it a lot better and simpler
Basically my view towards any other scientific topic, googling it yourself often times causes more questions than answers, thus causing more confusion and more procrastination the next time you try to google something similar
Yeah, but do you do with it?
When titrating iodine it pays to use starch as an indicator. The change from dark blue to colourless makes the endpoint much clearer than the slow fading out of yellow you were dealing with. This would also be much clearer on camera.
Nonetheless, good work as always!
Out was vey clear on camera. It went from yellow to clear.
In one of the “hidden” videos I flashed links for I used starch but I did not notice an increase in accuracy so I omitted it for the final. I always try to reduce instructions as much as possible.
@@theCodyReeder Hidden videos? All this sneaky business! :-D
The unnoticeable difference in accuracy may be related to the relatively high concentration of the thiosulphate solution used in the titration. 0.7mL is quite a small volume to be titrating with a burette of that size, so I still think starch would help if the precision of your measurement was of greater importance. But of course, you did it and it worked to demonstrate the efficacy of your homemade product!
I really love your work and I'm only a teeny bit jealous that with my urban location in Germany it would be exceedingly difficult for me to get away with even half of the experiments that you carry out! Someday I'd like to post a few practical science videos of my own but selecting the subject matter is proving a little tricky, for the above reason.
@@AguaFluorida you forgot that starch isn't an optimal indicator, it uses up "a lot" of thiosulpate for it to change color: to have a more noticeable change in color than the yellow-transparent in the video you have to add some mL of starch solution, in a reaction that only uses only 0.7 mL of (S2O3)2- solution it can cause an increase up to 0.5mL, with an enormous error! In fact it said to add starch only at the end of the titration to be able to see a little better the final part of the change, if you add it at the beginning it uses up reagents
@@8paolo96 Great reply, I'm glad to have stimulated a worthwhile discussion. =b
Ah man Cody you beat me to it! I was just working on making activated carbon from hardwood myself! Great video as always 👍
sorry about that. perhaps you could show a different method? If you do I'll be happy to link to it in the description.
Sounds good! Keep up the awesome content!
Stop messing about with charcoal and build that N2O4 and N2H4 rocket already!?!
Lub ya both
To bend metal tubing, securely close the 1 end, tightly pack the cavity with fine sand & seal the other end too. Now you can bend the tubing without having the tube cave in on itself. You can even saturate the sand with a soap water solution to reduce the friction - which will result in a smoother, more uniform bend.
Hi Cody, you just answered a decade old question in my mind about this notion of "activated carbon". Thanks
Nobody:
J.K.Rowlling: Cody and his Carbon have an intense sexual realationship.
@@AdrianPonceCorral I've a feeling it will float to the top even If I dont pin it.
@@theCodyReeder your feeling is partially correct sir
i can describe my reaction to this comment with only a : LOL
Underrated comment lmao
lololol
How did you super heat the steam ?. I'm assuming with the electric coils inside?, Would it be any better to superheat the steam in that tube before it hits the charcoal?. Like that's a wrap that tube with a heater coil?
I thought about doing that but bending the tube was harder than expected.
@@theCodyReeder I heard people fill the tubes with sand to keep the tube from collapsing and heard others freezing water inside the tube so its ice to keep it from collapsing when bending it.
For tube bending we were taught to use quartz sand. I think because ordinary sand might burn inside the tube if heated
@@ChristopherJones16 Water is used for bending tubing for instruments and pipes.
What if an iron tube is filled with very fine inert powder, an induction heater is used, and normal steam is passed into the apparatus? It could be bent into an u-shape to facilitate that.
Would that be able to superheat the steam?
I like how he's wearing his copper chainmail at the end under his flannel
I did not originally notice that.
Kudos to you for using "adsorbed" instead of "absorbed", big difference, frequently confused
thank YOU for pinting something out i didnt even notice
Me: The One Who uses Titration for something useful in life will definitely earn my RESPECT
Cody: Hold Charcoal.
From the creators of "Gloves for math" now we bring you "Gloves for clay"
"but we will put our bare hands into mercury"
@@manitoba-op4jx We all know that math is the stickiest substance on earth
A Cat watch his iodine videos
I would have added another sample: steam-heating the store bought one to see if I could make it more activated. Very interesting video by the way.
Another great video. So useful for air and water purification.
also for homemade gas mask
Try Shungite for water cleaning instead.
Cody youve motivated me to keep trying in my chemistry class! keep up the videos
Cody's Lab in 26 years: Making a black hole using a pressure chamber, activated carbon, and quantum vacuum energy.
He just came back from the futur to make that video
"How bout that!"
This reminds me one stargate episode (S05 E03). When Orlin made own Stargate in basement.
activated crystals using plasma bath and photon charging.
@Tian kay "Pouring Mercury Into A Micro Black Hole"
The thumbnail reads "IT RATTLES!!!", over bright lights & visible spacetime distortion.
Water:
hey bro I heard you liked pores, so I put pores in your pores
Yo dawg
I enjoyed this reference.
@@JosephQPublic thank you kind sir, I will notify my superiors
Only Boomers will get this
@@brainiac1595 sh-shut up
I don't know why but the sound and feel of the charcoal rubbing around gives me crazy goosebumps!
ASMR: Cody's Lab Edition
asmr
Almost sounds like glass.
I like how you explain the pores using the clay, and the experiment process. Even someone who's really bad with chemistry could understand. If my highschool teacher can explain things your way (clay is not expensive!) I would probably not fail my chemistry (and science) in high school!
We Need to have Science and Chemistry Teacher as good at Explaining Stuff as Cody.👍👍.Great Job.
The bought carbon isn't bad, your carbon is just better.
Artisanal carbon hahaha
@@TheBatlleAxeWarrior "organically manufactured" activated carbon
(Premium stuff.)
It's not clear if it's actually better, due to limited accuracy of measurement of weights and volumes. He said that in the video, mentioning error bars.
@@bytefu yes but it’s pretty safe to say it’s better
If we want to just increase the surface area, how is this activated charcoal better than just grinding it up to a very fine dust?
get it fine enough to be the equivalent of activated and it becomes useless as a filter because you cant hold onto it.
Cody'sLab could it work where you didn’t use it as a filter? Like if you swallowed a poison, or is activated still better?
@@superalvin7208 good question!
it might get too small and your body will absorb it along with the poison, making it useless.
fine dust wouldn't get channels to allow sht you need to react to go through.
it will act like a surface of one brick.
for swallowing it should be not effective too
because you need the pieces to stay and work in your stomach for a longer time.
This is fricking awesome. I don't know too much about chemistry so your videos feel like magic to me!
Really entertaining and educating.
Cody, it is worthwhile taking precautions regarding lungs, eyes, ears, kidneys and bladder since the problems from toxic exposure usually appear in later years when you are presented with your great grand-children. Such a loss of your presence at this time is a repeating tragedy around the world. Please do everything you can to break this scenario. Thank you for sharing Cody, very enjoyable demonstrations of possibilities.
I think you also found another way to further increase the yield of a wood gasifier. You get charcoal as a byproduct. The amount of charcoal is a limiting factor of your syngas production. If you find a more efficient way to do this process, you could theoretically increase the yeilds of bio-reactors.
Cody are you sure it isnt heavier cause you kept injecting the steam into it and saturated it with water?
I stopped the steam at about 700C so it should have dried out.
plus the charcoal that heated up in the cans was heavier
wouldnt the heat evaporate the residual h2o? like when you take moist laundry from the dryer and it gets dryer by evap?
@@danielrouw2593 so you're saying it may need to sit longer? Would dry freezing work?
@@marcpp if what they say is correct, it's just going to be as humid as the surrounding atmosphere. So freezer drying should work imo if it stayed sealed
Cody: You now know how to make activated carbon
me: I am definitely going to make activated carbon now
wear a dust mask. charcoal dust is extremely bad for your lungs.
@@TheAnantaSesa Most dust is bad for human lungs.
Hero Slippy, some types are -edited bad- worse like asbestos
@@TheAnantaSesa Read your last comment again.
Indra Verhoeven; do you know what asbestos is? they don’t use it much anymore but breathing asbestos dust causes mesothelioma. charcoal dust is bad too. it’s worse than just regular organic dust that the immune system can break down.
Hey Cody, you can fill the tube with table salt instead of tin, I did it myself and vouch for it.. I think much easier to do it that way, I learned it from someone who made copper coil for distilleries
I have the same activated charcoal. I have always wanted to see a DIY approach to making your own and how it compares to normal lump charcoal. This video helped answer a lot of questions I had. Thank you.
You can use frozen soapy water to bend pipes without crimping. Dawn dish soap works pretty well, it's how industrial companies do large amounts
I used to work at a carbon plant. The kilns were made from hastalloy. Absolute pain to weld.
is this alloy similar to what's used in the kind of ovens used to make mu metal?
Or made from HASTELLOY, actually.
Nothing like being pedantic at bedtime, lol.
"You'd much rather eat 10g of activated carbon than 1kg of charcoal."
A while back, I ran some numbers, and based on the LD50 for rats, 0.5kg of charcoal is the LD50 for a typical adult.
So yes, I would much rather eat 10g of activated carbon than twice the median lethal dose for an adult human.
THE MORE YOU KNOW
Normally, I'd be concerned that someone would use this info for bad things, but I'm doubtful someone could force themselves to consume even a half kilo of charcoal at once, much less a full kilo. Besides, Cody literally drank cyanide once.
@@ComradePhoenix *in two weeks*
Lower tier UA-camr: Hey welcome guys to the charcoal challenge...
Someone wouldnt have even been able to eat all that all at once
There's a guy that ate sunflower charcoal, he said it tastes decent.
This is the kind of stuff I subscribed for. I like the rest of the content but this was gold. ( Sure, not literally but you get the point)
This is one of my MOST FAVORITE CHANNELS
Your charcoal burn failed? Oof. It's been years since you did it, but if you haven't figured out a good way or if anyone else here needs one..❤
- Get (unused) paint cans with lids.
- Punch a tiny hole in the lid, 1-2mm (this is your wood gas exhaust).
- Load them with the target material.
- Lids on tight.
- Make a campfire.
- Toss the cans on the fire with the vent holes pointing upward.
- When gas starts exiting the cans the process has begun, wait until this stops*.
* For extra fun, light the wood gas stream on fire. Sometime I wanna try harvesting it to store somehow.
Need a video on how to make activated almonds.
Here from the newest video! Great to see how it's "actually" done.
Extra nice work
that tube bending needed more video man
If you don't want to go through the hassle of using tin for bending you can also fill the tubing with sand, it works great and you can pour it right out when you're done.
Great video btw!
I love how Cody always has a blow torch ready at hand like many people do with a pocket knife. "Hey bud, you got a light?" ... "I sure do sir! ".
Cody, great videos... but take better care of your lungs... because you're constantly working with dust, you'll eventually get COPD without diligent use of a dust mask.
life is dust.
Day 789146 Cody finally created magic 12:15
Are you implying that cody can live longer than 2000 years
@@vladimirlenin843 well yeah duh
That’s some high quality Jerry riggin right there
Never seen any video like this one clearly showing how to make activated carbon out of the industry and well, to prove it with a amazing test. Thannnnnnnnk you !
I love the experiments, man! Keep it up! I'm truly fascinated by almost everything you do. I guess it brings out my inner geek.
"I might use the dust for something else"
B O O M
To bend the tube faster fill it with sand it's really easier
what is that thing that shows up at 14:56 on the upper left corner?
Z79W0PkJzQ0 ... Hmm there's also 4a2V6toqg44 towards the end of the video
maybe a rendering error or Cody has been kidnapped and is trying to send us a message?
They're "links" to other UA-cam videos. Put them on the end of the URL, like this: /watch?v=FgJZA7c7Z9c (that's the code at 13:51).
@@StormBurnX for older videos that still have the annoytations
@@StormBurnX it's still there for when you come across older videos that still have them.
First impression to this channel: The difference between screwing around and science is writing it down. And this channel definitely science.
You could really call your channel Cody's DIY Lab!! Cuz its impressive how much you do from scratch.
Nobody:
Cody's Intro: "Gody Slab"
Cody's lab
Mr. Night Gody Slab
Yesssss! No more buying this stuff for my aquariums! Thanks!
9:06 How to do this PERFECTLY: Use the hydrogen flame to boil the water in the kettle.
could you ellaborate? i still don't understand why cody can't supply the steam continously
@@user-df5is8jy6n Well; the flamable gas that is produced from the reaction, instead of just being burnt for the heck of it, could be used to keep the kettle heated instead of using the torch. So it would be a full circle production with "minimal" startup. The heated steam produces flammable gas from reaction with charcoal, said gas is used to keep the kettle heated, which then continues the reaction and so on :)
@@TheMols14 really, so it was for economic consideration?
my hypothesis was, once the syngas produced from the reaction of steam and charcoal, the steam would only lower the overall temperature. i mean steam around a 100C, while syngas combustion would be higher than that i suppose.
what do you think?
@@TheMols14 It wouldn't work without at least a little help from an external source, considering it dies down after some time. Would be interesting to see it done, though 🤔 Maybe it would balance out?
@@TheMols14 You could only use the exhaust to help heat it, not to heat by itself, otherwise that would be perpetual energy. The kettle is the fuel tank for the CO and H mixture which requires a heat source. Boiling the water, the reacting the charcoal, etc. takes energy away from the equation, meaning that the energy returned would be rapidly diminishing every time you went from steam to flame to steam again.
Thats so cool Cody'sLab
There is rational for using activated charcoal for teeth whitening - it may help absorb discolorations in your tooth enamel. Activated charcoal has been anecdotally seen to whiten teeth, but use extreme care when brushing the substance onto your teeth.
Hi, captavating videos Cody, you most likely figured out by now the particals flying round at... 12:00 mins are actually the lining of the can,. Factory puts acrylic, polyester lining in cans to prevent rust activation and promotes longevity and sterile conditions.. anyway thanks for the videos Cody.. cool stuff... Thom in Scotland.
can you make your next video a squeal to this, ACTIVATED ALMONDS!
That would definitely activate my almonds
Why would you want him to squeal?
This milks my almonds.
>be me
>covered in mud and blood from Rugby practice
>see cody posted
>*happiness noise*
>still havent showered, but my carbon is activated
@3:20 CODY: "this much charcoal wouldn't even fit in your stomach...".
INTERNET: "HOLD MY BEER!"
MORNING NEWS: "A crazy new challenge sweeping the internet, The charcoal challenge, where people try and ingest a kilo if charcoal".
ME: 🤔😢🤣😂
mostl compition eater ingest about7-9lbs of food or more so im guessing its possible, just not very tasty
Its gonna go into the Guiness book of world records if someone does this and doesent die of choking on charcoal
Florida man consumes large amounts of activated charcoal, sources say
*
Sam Ferguson
9 months ago
"You'd much rather eat 10g of activated carbon than 1kg of charcoal."
A while back, I ran some numbers, and based on the LD50 for rats, 0.5kg of charcoal is the LD50 for a typical adult.
So yes, I would much rather eat 10g of activated carbon than twice the median lethal dose for an adult human."
This is amazing Cody, you’re much appreciated for sharing this project
I believe this apparatus is the most pleasing to view. Well done!
Yay :3
I have something to watch.
ikr
My mood
I feel like the past couple days all of my subscriptions have barely been putting anything out, regardless of genre.
StoreBrand seriously yes
Thanks, I needed this for re-fueling gas masks
G W No real point in a gas mask if you cheap out on your filters. The more the charcoal can hold, the more time you have to get to a safer area
This method would not be sufficient for gases
3:55 but will it blend?
4:10 carbon smoke. Don't breathe this!
Haha, "Will it blend?" comes from right here in Orem, and several years ago I shot a little video for that guy, Tom Dickson, at the nearby grocery store (Macey's)!
Ty for including the calculus for the experiments. As a student it really helps.
a master titration tip- spin the handle 180 degrees as fast as you can. Play with it and you can zoom in on the perfect amount. once you get it, everyone will get the same blank value.
Nice vid Cody!
Health advice: if you don't want to get anthracosis because of inhaling the coal dust you should better to use a fine mask.
If used in black powder, would it have any effect?
Watch elementalmaker's video of him trying activated charcoal graphite and willow charcoal
Activated carbon is generally known to be less effective or even unsuitable.
You want some residual hydrocarbons for the optimal/highest reactivity.
There are certainly different varieties of activated charcoal (with different chemical composition and surface area/structure), that might act differently, but for the most part it's more pure carbon, that is less reactive.
You would normally grind the charcoal as fine as possible anyways, so surface area should not differ that much afterwards either.
So you could use it, but probably won't get better results, than with specially suited charcoal (wood type, pyrolysis conditions, particle size). It mainly will produce a much slower, more sparkly effect.
As incorporating sulfur into charcoal improves performance, it could be interesting to investigate, wether one could infuse activated charcoal more easily with sulfur in solution. But that would never be practical.
The main goals of BP are to be cheap, easily ignitable and reliable at various performance levels.
@@realedna Adding sulfur into the activated carbon would make it more unstable for ignition right?
Cody. Did you do an experiment with wood gasification yet .
And if you decide to do it could you run a small engine off the fuel.
Do it your way ,so it makes sense.
Thank you for good science,chemistry,physics,baking .so forth.
I'd bet that a significant factor in the density change between the untreated control versus the treated sample and heated sample is due to some sneaky fluids added to the commercial charcoal to help it burn. Putting it through the furnace either drove off the lighter fluid or cooked it down to carbon.
It's the fifth time now that I come across a useful video, and I see it's a Cody's video, after I finish it.
Can you make a gas mask filter using your DIY A.C.?... that would make for a cool survivalist video!!!!!