According to my calculations, 16K is the perfect integer scale for all major video resolutions. 240 * 36 = 8640 (retro consoles in NTSC) 288 * 30 = 8640 (retro consoles in PAL) 480 * 18 = 8640 (SD NTSC) 576 * 15 = 8640 (PAL) 720 * 12 = 8640 (HD Ready) 1080 * 8 = 8640 (2K Full HD) 1440 * 6 = 8640 (Quad HD) 2160 * 4 = 8640 (4K Ultra HD) 2880 * 3 = 8640 (5K) 4320 * 2 = 8640 (8K) For handhelds, it is also an integer scale with: 144 * 60 = 8640 (Game Boy, Game Gear) 160 * 54 = 8640 (Game Boy Advance) 192 * 45 = 8640 (DS per screen) (272 - 2) * 32 = 8640 (PSP, minus two extraneous pixels) (544 - 4) * 16 = 8640 (PS Vita, minus four extraneous pixels) This also means ultrawide resolutions on PC would be great here, because the 15360 horizontal resolution has great integer scales too: 2560x1080 * 6 = 15360x6480 (1080p 21:9) 3840x1080 * 6 = 15360x4320 (1080p 32:9) 5120x2160 * 3 = 15360x6480 (2160p 21:9) 7680x2160 * 2 = 15360x4320 (2160p 32:9) And 16K with the best HDR would give us the best CRT emulation shaders.
@@Miguel_Noether It is though. 2K has been a digital standard for a long time referring to basically 2048x1080, and I’ve always been annoyed when someone calls 1440p “2K”. Calling UHD (3840x2160) screens “4K” (4096x2160) is much less egregious, since they’re almost the same and have been marketed as the same thing. But by that same logic, you could refer to a FHD screen as 2K.
Not that it really matters that much, there's so many pixels that you wouldn't lose much to get integer scaling, or just not and I doubt you'd really even be able to notice any of the tiny artifacts it creates.
The tv has the same pixel density as a 27.5 inch uhd display and 16 times the area. If the pixels alternated between three sets of color primaries and two polarizations it would be possible to create a system able to display 3d at 1/6 resolution per eye for three sets of images at a time. 1/6 resolution is QHD and it would also be possible to have six 2D QHD images at once. The problems with this approach is creating the three sets of three narrow primary color bands of red, green and blue light for the backlight, also patterning the color filters with nine different colors and the last problems is the creating the pattern of polarization filters. For the baclight lasers are applicable and polarised glasses was used in 3d tvsand is therefore proven.
Theres anotherway but its a hologram form,thats in the air,no physical back lights or a lcd screen. I can not tell how it works because I have a prototype and I might gets some patient's before some gets it to me.only thing I will say,it uses freq waves.
I can imagine how impressive it is when it looks good even in 480p. It's good that technology is developing. 24k videos are being released on UA-cam. I hope we see 24k TVs next year.
this TV has more resolution than a 35mm film and almost reaches the theoretical resolution of an IMAX frame, although 110-inch 16K TVs may not make much sense at a home level, their usefulness in the business field it's undeniable.
@@shepard717 Good examples of their use can be found in industries such as film, advertising, and product promotion. There are many possibilities for its use.
Love this channel. Right straight to the point. The title of the video is literally the first sentence spoken, you see the TV immediately. Most other channels would be probably be a video essay on the history of television and cinema.
I have a series s and my tv upscales it from 1440p to 4k (in game, everything else including the UI and apps like streaming services all still run at native 4k on the series s) and it looks almost identical to a series x runing native 4k. Same could be doable with a 4k or 5k focused PC and having your display upscale it to 8k. Its not native but its close.
I hope you can afford that card from Nvidia when that time will come! With the current price setting Nvidia do, you probably will not have enough money for a screen with that resolution! Some years ago I bought GTX 1060 for around 250 USD converted, to get an affordable card today, you need to double the price! 😢
They really missed the mark on feeding it with 8k content. That 16k is 132MP! While 8k material is only 32MP. They should have hired photographers to produce that material for them in the actual resolution, as its possible. I do that regularly with a 20 year old kit, that produced true 3x132MP. No bayer mush.
I have questions .... so hdmi 2.1 can goto 48 gigabit , which is enough for 8k 120 ... but not 16k , so how is one supposed to input the source material ?
Is there anyway to even output a 16K signal to it? DisplayPort 2.0/2.1 could do 16K but I doubt it has any DisplayPort inputs. There are no versions of HDMI that support 16K
yes i find that having a screen with 2X the resolution of source material with AI upscale works pretty well. i mean 4K upscaled to 8K on Sony Z9J looks pretty good - noticeably better than just regular 4K screen. you don't get any more detail this way but you do get noticeably smoother and sharper edges than the jagged ones you get without the upscale. that said since most video content is in 4K i am happy with my 8K screen for now. i just need a new PC so i can have native 8K for things like web pages. latest digital cinema cameras like Sony Vegas 2 can shoot in 8K but most digital cinema projectors are 4K at best so there is relatively little incentive for Hollywood to shoot movies in 8K for now. That said i'm glad they're experimenting with 16K early so it can be more mature by the time there is content for it.
You will hardly find ANY native real 4k sources. Most have been altered. Do you even knowhow extreme amount of bandwith you would have needed to get REAL 8k content? Most have TERRIBLE colorbanding issues.
110 inch i definitely welcome the size. I hope oled are made these big like 120 inch 4k 120fps hdr dolby vision oled would be awesome for game, 8k or 8k upscaled to 16k for normal content playback.
Finally a TV big enough for the guest bathroom. I'm hoping by next year to get a MLA OLED, 8K, 85" (provided Sony offers one - much better motion than LG IMHO) - sadly I think that HDMI 2.1 is already obsolete (as it was in concept stage) and years away from an updated spec.
What is the point of 16K if you can't even see the pixel structure with your nose right up the panel? People aren't going to sit one foot from that kind of screen, so it would have been fine with 'just' 8K.
I still have my LG Cx and have ZERO need to upgrade or look for better. It performs so unbelievably well. Ill maybe look in the shops in about 5 years from now. Vincent, great jokes and review as always
The hits just keep on coming! “As they say there’s three kinds of people : those who are good at numbers and those who are not” how could I continue after that? I’m recovering from coffee burns this has caused me
I absolutely cannot wait to be an early adopter of this 16K set as soon as it hits the market. More and more adult films are being produced in resolutions higher than 4K now such as 6K and 8K - so I'd imagine some of them could be produced at 16K by the time this set releases. There would be no need for physical hook-ups and intimacy once these 16K films and 16K TVs become reality - you will literally get the full experience (with all the sensations) in your private room at a moment's notice upon a click of a button.
i know 8k and 16k is not necessary but i recently saw a 12k movie camera demo on a 8k tv its really realy something special it reminds me of the 70 mm films that to this day look the best is thats where we are heading , i am excited lol
I'm thrilled to see the advancements in technology that have led to the creation of a prototype 16K TV with a massive 110" screen. However, it's surprising that the refresh rate remains at 60Hz, especially considering how easily 4K TVs achieved higher refresh rates. I wonder if there's a deliberate decision to hold back and not fully indulge us, or if there are other reasons for not adopting a technology that already exists everywhere, even with gaming monitors reaching refresh rates of 240Hz.
HDMI doesn’t even have a standard out that could push 16K, only 10K.The only standard we have for this is DisplayPort 2.0 for 16K at 60Hz with compression.
You understand nothing about panel technology if you're asking questions like this. A 4k 120hz display only has to output 995,328,000 pixels per second compared that to this 16k 60hz screen and it's outputting 7,962,624,000 pixels per second. That is 8x more pixels it has to output per second. They literally cannot make the refresh rate any faster not to mention this does require more processing power to do.
@@voluntarism335 Wow, thank you for enlightening me with your profound wisdom! Clearly, you're the ultimate authority on panel technology, and I bow down to your infinite knowledge. How dare I, a mere mortal, dare to ask questions and seek further understanding. Your condescending comment has truly opened my eyes to my complete lack of comprehension. I shall forever be indebted to your superior intellect.
16k , wow , pixels must be so small . Its 4x 8k panels of 55" or 16 panels of 4k of 27" monitors , wow 27" 4k monitors pixels are so damn small that you have to put your nose next to it to see any pixels . This is crazy for tv tho , setting 10 ft away its gonna be same as reality , but what kinda of computer power to drive this display , crazy.
Dual 32k displays will have enough pixel density to make a seamless VR but the hardware that requires for something like that to run a AAA game ON Device at 480 and above FPS is atleast 500 years away. Almost every technology of computing needs a paradigm shift to have the energy efficiency and low profile high computing. So a perfect VR will remain a pipe dream for at least the next 4 or 5 incarnations of your soul.
I run a three wide 4K monitor setup, so that’s 3/4 the pixel width of this… but the side monitors are tilted in at about a 45° angle. 16K is pretty much useless on a flat screen this big, because if you are close enough to take full advantage of the pixel density at the center of the display, the edges are much too far away. Even 8K is pushing beyond useful for a flat screen.
I have seen the early 16K camera and display technology prototypes at NHK R&D center back in 2005. The initial target audience is medical, science, military, etc…
I wasn't a fan of the push for 8k at first, it wasn't ready, we're finally approaching a point where AI can fill in the gaps on information loss to make something like this practical, I'm really looking forward to seeing this fine tuned and commercialized in a few short years, imagine a 16k QD-OLED with 4 times the processing power, upscaling, and brightness, mfs will have a hard time tearing themselves away from the imagery 😳
@@Nobody-Nowhere everything comes in stages, the content you refer to is beyond current bandwidth caps, would only be feasible with direct content playback, and massive storage would be required, it already is for 4K, multiply that and there's a problem, upscaling helps bridge the gap, allowing for onboard software to effectively make up the difference and allow for content to be sharper and more detailed than the original more conservative source could provide
If you don't see pixel even from 1 feet, what a reason to make such a huge resolution (133 MP). Move to comfortable 3-4 meters and you will not see any difference between 110" 4k and 16k. Extremely high density of pixels is important for VR, but TV is fine with 50-100 ppi
I love seeing that there are 16K displays out there now, but I don't see that ever really coming down to the retail level for most consumers at any point. Even today, where we have had 8K TV's and displays on sale for several years now, almost no one is buying them still. Until there is a massive shift over to 8K content, I really don't see that happening. And, one thing we are quickly finding out is that for the majority of home viewing situations, 4K resolution is more than enough. Now, there will be certain instances where 8K is preferred, like when you are doing multiple lower resolution inputs into the same panel for multi-view scenarios, but there just aren't that many customers that are looking to do that yet. That will probably change over time when the cost of micro-LED displays comes down and video walls in the home become affordable options of course, but that transition is going to be FAR slower than what most people projected or forecasted. It's now looking like 4K is going to settle in as the default standard resolution for a VERY long time, much longer than what anyone had originally predicted or expected.
@@hopperbopper well, I hate to burst your bubble here but there is simply just a limit to how much detail the human eye can resolve at a given distance. And, on top of that, people simply aren't going to be willing to pay for something that they see no benefit from. 8K TV's just aren't selling today. That's not because there is no content, that's because when customers walk into the store, the literally have to ask which screens are 8K - because they can't tell on their own (even with a native 8K demo running!) Sure, 8K will have its role and one day 16K will too, but those displays will max out at maybe only be 3% to 5% of the market at any point, if that. Sorry. Unless you can figure out a way to upgrade the human eye...that's the way it's going to be I'm afraid. Unless something drastic changes, 4K is very likely here to stay.
@@hopperbopper sure they will, but they won't be doing it because they notice any difference in picture quality - they won't. We already know that because NO ONE can tell the difference between 4K and 8K at normal TV viewing distances. Will people eventually buy 8K sets because the price came down? Absolutely. But that's the ONLY reason why they will be buying them. Again, until you can improve on the human eye...
@@hopperbopper I hear you, but I think you're missing a fundamental, underlying point here as well. Manufacturers really don't care if their added features actually provide any discernable or measurable benefit to consumers at all. Why? Because no matter what, they HAVE to release and sell a new generation of models with each and every year that comes to pass - and they HAVE to do it in VOLUME, especially if they are a publicly traded company with SHARHOLDERS to please. They HAVE to try and convince consumers that there is a benefit to upgrading, even if they know for a fact there isn't. We see this same thing happen literally every year in the home audio space most obviously. So, sure, companies will always push out new tech, regardless of whether or not it will be of any real benefit to consumers at all. That, you can count on!
It has a contrast ratio of 12000:1, which incidentally are the odds of you being able to afford this TV. It comes with two handles on each side to minimize the injury risk to repo men. As they say, there are three types of people in this world, but none of them have any 16K content.
The jokes 😂 vincent is on fire today!😂
My dopamine spikes whenever I hear the ding 🛎
+1
Gal Gadot's what ?
I had to rewind half the clip after I stopped laughing 😅😂🤣
@@ahmadhayat6314 Eyebrows 🤤🤤
The numbers joke got me, 11/10.
just one number away
According to my calculations, 16K is the perfect integer scale for all major video resolutions.
240 * 36 = 8640 (retro consoles in NTSC)
288 * 30 = 8640 (retro consoles in PAL)
480 * 18 = 8640 (SD NTSC)
576 * 15 = 8640 (PAL)
720 * 12 = 8640 (HD Ready)
1080 * 8 = 8640 (2K Full HD)
1440 * 6 = 8640 (Quad HD)
2160 * 4 = 8640 (4K Ultra HD)
2880 * 3 = 8640 (5K)
4320 * 2 = 8640 (8K)
For handhelds, it is also an integer scale with:
144 * 60 = 8640 (Game Boy, Game Gear)
160 * 54 = 8640 (Game Boy Advance)
192 * 45 = 8640 (DS per screen)
(272 - 2) * 32 = 8640 (PSP, minus two extraneous pixels)
(544 - 4) * 16 = 8640 (PS Vita, minus four extraneous pixels)
This also means ultrawide resolutions on PC would be great here, because the 15360 horizontal resolution has great integer scales too:
2560x1080 * 6 = 15360x6480 (1080p 21:9)
3840x1080 * 6 = 15360x4320 (1080p 32:9)
5120x2160 * 3 = 15360x6480 (2160p 21:9)
7680x2160 * 2 = 15360x4320 (2160p 32:9)
And 16K with the best HDR would give us the best CRT emulation shaders.
i aint reading allat
@@gsklol He provides useful information ;)
1080 is 2K full hd😂😂😂😂😂
@@Miguel_Noether It is though. 2K has been a digital standard for a long time referring to basically 2048x1080, and I’ve always been annoyed when someone calls 1440p “2K”. Calling UHD (3840x2160) screens “4K” (4096x2160) is much less egregious, since they’re almost the same and have been marketed as the same thing. But by that same logic, you could refer to a FHD screen as 2K.
Not that it really matters that much, there's so many pixels that you wouldn't lose much to get integer scaling, or just not and I doubt you'd really even be able to notice any of the tiny artifacts it creates.
damn i want a tv that is finer than gal gadot's
hahahahaha :-)
Gal Gadot's what ?
@@fat69100 boobs or ass, which she got none of both tho
@@fat69100 All of Gal Gadot is fine.
@@fat69100Gal Godot's mum
You are perfect. Never change 😂
Finer than Gal Gadot's what tho???
@@krackeded7236Since it was bleeped, we can only wonder...
*awful
Fancy seeing you here XD (Keep up the great work!!)
@@MarCuseus No Likes 🤡
THIS is why IMAX film is king. Now we just need Warner Bros to rescan Nolans movies into 16K digital
Vincent is Hilarious, and I feel It goes under appreciated lmao!
9/10 comments here about his jokes, how is that underappreciated?
We always come back to you Vincent for three reasons: 1. The superlative television coverage, 2. The jokes DING! 😀
You just never know when V will hit you with a fken banger. I'm more on-edge watching his vids than a trailer for horror film.
The tv has the same pixel density as a 27.5 inch uhd display and 16 times the area. If the pixels alternated between three sets of color primaries and two polarizations it would be possible to create a system able to display 3d at 1/6 resolution per eye for three sets of images at a time. 1/6 resolution is QHD and it would also be possible to have six 2D QHD images at once. The problems with this approach is creating the three sets of three narrow primary color bands of red, green and blue light for the backlight, also patterning the color filters with nine different colors and the last problems is the creating the pattern of polarization filters. For the baclight lasers are applicable and polarised glasses was used in 3d tvsand is therefore proven.
Interesting. But nobody wants to wear glasses.
Theres anotherway but its a hologram form,thats in the air,no physical back lights or a lcd screen. I can not tell how it works because I have a prototype and I might gets some patient's before some gets it to me.only thing I will say,it uses freq waves.
Daming alam 😂
I feel like a caveman reading op's comment
@@frederickhandani6419 you’re not alone. The guy knows too much to even enjoy watching the movies anymore.
I love how as he ages Vincent gets bolder and bolder with the jokes
Yolo 🙆🏻♂️
This is a huge step for the LGHDTV community!
LGBTQ community LOL
@@privacyhelplets go beat the quadriplet 👍
@@privacyhelpNo one said that. They are useless and never make steps like this
@dampsponge4944 yeah getting green lines😂
@@privacyhelp r/whoosh
First time in history a one and a half minute about a TV made me laugh three times. Applause!
I can imagine how impressive it is when it looks good even in 480p. It's good that technology is developing. 24k videos are being released on UA-cam. I hope we see 24k TVs next year.
Everybody is waiting for Vincent’s final review of Samsung S95C and he is presenting 16K tv😂
My man Vincent is on it with the jokes today.
this TV has more resolution than a 35mm film and almost reaches the theoretical resolution of an IMAX frame, although 110-inch 16K TVs may not make much sense at a home level, their usefulness in the business field it's undeniable.
Example of usefulness in the business field?
is it helpful for medicinal purposes for example? or maybe in excavations ?
Home projectors at 16k makes sense
Most old 35 mm 4k movies have an effective resolution that is significantly below a modern 4k digital production.
@@shepard717 Good examples of their use can be found in industries such as film, advertising, and product promotion. There are many possibilities for its use.
Thank you as always, staying on the cutting edge as much as any UA-cam, website or TV channel around! :0)
I’m going to wait for 24k
When im a adult the S28 ULTRA is a thing
Love this channel. Right straight to the point. The title of the video is literally the first sentence spoken, you see the TV immediately. Most other channels would be probably be a video essay on the history of television and cinema.
You should do an April fools joke next year where you film an open window and talk about how it’s 32K
“It’s so lifelike!”
Impressive. IMAX 70mm film is even higher resolution at 18K.
You have an IMAX in your house? Nice.
@@porvoonosho
There is no digital IMAX >4k resolution...
@@L1ft0ff Hence he said "film"
Are there any IMAX 70mm film projectors still left?
I had to replay this too many times because I couldn't stop laughing!😂😂😂
We can't even run 8K properly yet and these mad lads made a 16K screen LMAO. I love tech so much.
In truth, we had 4K before anyone could run it properly too.
You can with a 4090. Productivity tasks and gaming on a PC is about the only way to use an 8K display effectively though.
I have a series s and my tv upscales it from 1440p to 4k (in game, everything else including the UI and apps like streaming services all still run at native 4k on the series s) and it looks almost identical to a series x runing native 4k. Same could be doable with a 4k or 5k focused PC and having your display upscale it to 8k. Its not native but its close.
Useful for still photography.
Title: forget 8k
Me with a 600p monitor 🌚
Can't wait for Nvidia RTX 8090 with HDMI 6.2 to display 4:4:4 16k 69 bits
Don't worry bro. It will still barely manage 60-80 fps with frame gen 5 in its modern games.
Dream on NVIDIA is so greedy, it will be on the RtX 5050 in the year 2035
I hope you can afford that card from Nvidia when that time will come!
With the current price setting Nvidia do, you probably will not have enough money for a screen with that resolution!
Some years ago I bought GTX 1060 for around 250 USD converted, to get an affordable card today, you need to double the price! 😢
@240 Hz!
probably have to wait till RTX 9090 for 16k.
They really missed the mark on feeding it with 8k content. That 16k is 132MP! While 8k material is only 32MP.
They should have hired photographers to produce that material for them in the actual resolution, as its possible. I do that regularly with a 20 year old kit, that produced true 3x132MP.
No bayer mush.
_Pfft, not good enough, I want a 24K TV..._
_...Ya know, it has a solid "Gold" picture running 24/7_
I have questions .... so hdmi 2.1 can goto 48 gigabit , which is enough for 8k 120 ... but not 16k , so how is one supposed to input the source material ?
USB or SD card port? Built in drive?
The jokes!!!! They never end 😂😂😂
Is there anyway to even output a 16K signal to it? DisplayPort 2.0/2.1 could do 16K but I doubt it has any DisplayPort inputs. There are no versions of HDMI that support 16K
Most likely a USB Thumb Drive with a ton of storage and couple of files that it runs on a loop.
absolutely massive. like glueing four 55" together
Jeez holy crap true
yes i find that having a screen with 2X the resolution of source material with AI upscale works pretty well. i mean 4K upscaled to 8K on Sony Z9J looks pretty good - noticeably better than just regular 4K screen. you don't get any more detail this way but you do get noticeably smoother and sharper edges than the jagged ones you get without the upscale. that said since most video content is in 4K i am happy with my 8K screen for now. i just need a new PC so i can have native 8K for things like web pages. latest digital cinema cameras like Sony Vegas 2 can shoot in 8K but most digital cinema projectors are 4K at best so there is relatively little incentive for Hollywood to shoot movies in 8K for now. That said i'm glad they're experimenting with 16K early so it can be more mature by the time there is content for it.
How much did you pay for z9j? 💵
16k is 4x not 2x
You will hardly find ANY native real 4k sources.
Most have been altered.
Do you even knowhow extreme amount of bandwith you would have needed to get REAL 8k content?
Most have TERRIBLE colorbanding issues.
@@ruben7937 Buhahaha 😹 Who told you such a stupid things? 😂
What a load of nonsense. Noticeably better my arse.
110 inch i definitely welcome the size. I hope oled are made these big like 120 inch 4k 120fps hdr dolby vision oled would be awesome for game, 8k or 8k upscaled to 16k for normal content playback.
Whats crazy is you can see how crystal clear the display is just from the video itself even at 1080p. I cant imagine how amazing it looks in person.
I’m so glad Vincent is doing so well these days. He is absolutely filling a void. Kinda like when I visit the toilet.
I look forward to Freeview channels in 16K.
In about 20 years if I'm lucky.
This came up on my Google algorithm the presenter made me subscribe to the channel what a legend 👏
Finally a TV big enough for the guest bathroom. I'm hoping by next year to get a MLA OLED, 8K, 85" (provided Sony offers one - much better motion than LG IMHO) - sadly I think that HDMI 2.1 is already obsolete (as it was in concept stage) and years away from an updated spec.
I think we need a new HDMI standard with that kind of resolution lol
@@nathanmerritt1581 Yeah, does hdmi pull 60 hz 8k? Guess it does, but ain't no problem for the new displayport 2.0 iirc.
I am holding out for 32K!
The delivery on the jokes - the pan face - comedy gold!
What is the point of 16K if you can't even see the pixel structure with your nose right up the panel?
People aren't going to sit one foot from that kind of screen, so it would have been fine with 'just' 8K.
The zingers in this video were packed as tight as the pixels in this display 😂
I’ll hold out for 64K
I still have my LG Cx and have ZERO need to upgrade or look for better. It performs so unbelievably well. Ill maybe look in the shops in about 5 years from now. Vincent, great jokes and review as always
CX gang, I'm thinking of upgrading once MicroLed or something better so yea 5 years.
@@biohead66 Exactly! someone thats knows what they are talking about! MicroLed is the only move ill make, but it isnt there yet..let it mature first
No body in Canada broadcasts 4k and you want me to buy 16k 😂 😂
I'm gonna wait for 32K.
No 64K will be OK 😁
We need 64K
@@haukikannel yea with 360hz
lol this is actually the funniest of these types of videos I've ever seen
1 FPS gaming has never been more impressive until now!
Slideshow gaming
The hits just keep on coming! “As they say there’s three kinds of people : those who are good at numbers and those who are not” how could I continue after that? I’m recovering from coffee burns this has caused me
I absolutely cannot wait to be an early adopter of this 16K set as soon as it hits the market. More and more adult films are being produced in resolutions higher than 4K now such as 6K and 8K - so I'd imagine some of them could be produced at 16K by the time this set releases. There would be no need for physical hook-ups and intimacy once these 16K films and 16K TVs become reality - you will literally get the full experience (with all the sensations) in your private room at a moment's notice upon a click of a button.
That's if you don't get popped for dl kiddy corn first
i know 8k and 16k is not necessary
but i recently saw a 12k movie camera demo on a 8k tv
its really realy something special it reminds me of the 70 mm films that to this day look the best
is thats where we are heading , i am excited lol
Finally the human eye resolution TV
And still no 4k broadcasting in the UK.... even 8k is completely pointless for most people.....
Am I the only one who would play Crysis on this at maximum graphics?
god i love this guy 🤣🤣🤣
And here in my house we have just 1 TV that is just 720p and 43 inch, when my family gets to 4K then 32K will be standard haha
Gal gadots %@#! though 👌😂
Honestly wasn't expecting that part and laughed so loud everyone was staring at me in the line at the grocery store. 😭
@@hypno18sext time bring a sound system to the supermarket for Vincent
Now all I need is 16k resolution movies, 16k capable video game hardware and a second mortgage for the TV.
Great things comes in small packages
I love the delivery.
all tv's should come with handles lol
The gal gadot joke killed me
That native contrast made me cry 😢
At that point, you really just gotta trust them when they tell you it's 16K lol
Count the Galgadots.
in reality its 15k because they just had to save the extra $300 on this $200,000 TV. 4k TV's are actually 3k horizontally so its technically not 4k.
@@BoltRM i love her
Congratulations on 500k subs 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Nice to know that someday we'll have affordable TVs like this in all our homes.
give it 20 years
Congrats on 500k subs!
I would buy this. Finally a tv to scale properly with all content and pixels invisible
I clicked out of curiosity for 16k and I stayed for the jokes. Damn you're amazing!
Good luck finding native 16K content
good luck gaming in 16k.
@@WednesdayMan It will be upscaled from 720p with DLSS Ultra Mega Super Awesome Quality mode.
@@kazioo2
Yes!
A feature that Nvidia 9000 series will have!
Why did they not shoot footage with the 12K Blackmagic?!?
I'm thrilled to see the advancements in technology that have led to the creation of a prototype 16K TV with a massive 110" screen. However, it's surprising that the refresh rate remains at 60Hz, especially considering how easily 4K TVs achieved higher refresh rates. I wonder if there's a deliberate decision to hold back and not fully indulge us, or if there are other reasons for not adopting a technology that already exists everywhere, even with gaming monitors reaching refresh rates of 240Hz.
hey man, for now its one or the other. You still dont have 240hz 4k displays
HDMI doesn’t even have a standard out that could push 16K, only 10K.The only standard we have for this is DisplayPort 2.0 for 16K at 60Hz with compression.
@@rogoznicafc9672 Yeah you do. 4k 240 hz has existed for quite a while. There's even a fake 8k 240 coming, in the form of the 57" g9 which is 2x4k
You understand nothing about panel technology if you're asking questions like this.
A 4k 120hz display only has to output 995,328,000 pixels per second compared that to this 16k 60hz screen and it's outputting 7,962,624,000 pixels per second.
That is 8x more pixels it has to output per second. They literally cannot make the refresh rate any faster not to mention this does require more processing power to do.
@@voluntarism335 Wow, thank you for enlightening me with your profound wisdom! Clearly, you're the ultimate authority on panel technology, and I bow down to your infinite knowledge. How dare I, a mere mortal, dare to ask questions and seek further understanding. Your condescending comment has truly opened my eyes to my complete lack of comprehension. I shall forever be indebted to your superior intellect.
16k , wow , pixels must be so small .
Its 4x 8k panels of 55" or 16 panels of 4k of 27" monitors , wow
27" 4k monitors pixels are so damn small that you have to put your nose next to it to see any pixels .
This is crazy for tv tho , setting 10 ft away its gonna be same as reality , but what kinda of computer power to drive this display , crazy.
Probably still not enough for perfect full FOV VR, but for a stationary display seems like an overkill.
Dual 32k displays will have enough pixel density to make a seamless VR but the hardware that requires for something like that to run a AAA game ON Device at 480 and above FPS is atleast 500 years away.
Almost every technology of computing needs a paradigm shift to have the energy efficiency and low profile high computing. So a perfect VR will remain a pipe dream for at least the next 4 or 5 incarnations of your soul.
I run a three wide 4K monitor setup, so that’s 3/4 the pixel width of this… but the side monitors are tilted in at about a 45° angle. 16K is pretty much useless on a flat screen this big, because if you are close enough to take full advantage of the pixel density at the center of the display, the edges are much too far away. Even 8K is pushing beyond useful for a flat screen.
@@shadowxaf,про Full HD также говорили в своё время.
Me: "WOW That looks so amazing.
Also me: On my 4k monitor lmfao.
Hi Vincent, long time subscriber first time caller..my interest is in the micro led TV. Do you have any content on it?
Seems like a perfect time for your first search as well.
We still have 720p/1080p programming and 4K movies. What do I need this for
There are still poor TV channels in 480p….
I have seen the early 16K camera and display technology prototypes at NHK R&D center back in 2005. The initial target audience is medical, science, military, etc…
What? Interesting, elaborate.
I wasn't a fan of the push for 8k at first, it wasn't ready, we're finally approaching a point where AI can fill in the gaps on information loss to make something like this practical, I'm really looking forward to seeing this fine tuned and commercialized in a few short years, imagine a 16k QD-OLED with 4 times the processing power, upscaling, and brightness, mfs will have a hard time tearing themselves away from the imagery 😳
upscaling is nonsense, you can produce 8k content. And even 16k. Upscaling, no matter if you include the AI there.. is nonsense mush.
@@Nobody-Nowhere everything comes in stages, the content you refer to is beyond current bandwidth caps, would only be feasible with direct content playback, and massive storage would be required, it already is for 4K, multiply that and there's a problem, upscaling helps bridge the gap, allowing for onboard software to effectively make up the difference and allow for content to be sharper and more detailed than the original more conservative source could provide
8k is maybe ready in 10 or 20 years.
Todays tvs have still not fixed the long list of problems they have struggled with for 20 years.
@@ruben7937yeah I def give it another 10 years b4 8K is as standard as 4K
@@ruben7937 8k is available now idiot.
"Forget 8K - Here's The World's First 110-inch 16K TV!"
me: TAKE MY MONEY, I NEED THIS THING
Nah i'm going for 32K
32k @ 240hz. Just so I can look at static images on it.
I still have lcd hd ready tv on mva matrix since 11 years, image is still sharp as the name of the brand.
16K pixels are from now on referred to as GALGA-DOTS!
Humour, men's fashion glasses and hair styles and great TV reviews... There's something here for everyone 😊
DING 😂😂😂😂
Gal Gadots what ?!?!!? hahaha
🎂
If you don't see pixel even from 1 feet, what a reason to make such a huge resolution (133 MP). Move to comfortable 3-4 meters and you will not see any difference between 110" 4k and 16k. Extremely high density of pixels is important for VR, but TV is fine with 50-100 ppi
Dropping the joke bombs
i got distracted and couldn't follow the technical details after that line lmao! 1:00
Can't wait for 2042 when i can buy a 16k micro led tv for 1,499
Truly LOL, it's like a stand up comedy skit with information about a 100" TV
I love seeing that there are 16K displays out there now, but I don't see that ever really coming down to the retail level for most consumers at any point. Even today, where we have had 8K TV's and displays on sale for several years now, almost no one is buying them still. Until there is a massive shift over to 8K content, I really don't see that happening. And, one thing we are quickly finding out is that for the majority of home viewing situations, 4K resolution is more than enough. Now, there will be certain instances where 8K is preferred, like when you are doing multiple lower resolution inputs into the same panel for multi-view scenarios, but there just aren't that many customers that are looking to do that yet. That will probably change over time when the cost of micro-LED displays comes down and video walls in the home become affordable options of course, but that transition is going to be FAR slower than what most people projected or forecasted. It's now looking like 4K is going to settle in as the default standard resolution for a VERY long time, much longer than what anyone had originally predicted or expected.
Right and does anyone truly know how good 4k looks? The best looking tvs are in 4k 😂
@@hopperbopper well, I hate to burst your bubble here but there is simply just a limit to how much detail the human eye can resolve at a given distance. And, on top of that, people simply aren't going to be willing to pay for something that they see no benefit from. 8K TV's just aren't selling today. That's not because there is no content, that's because when customers walk into the store, the literally have to ask which screens are 8K - because they can't tell on their own (even with a native 8K demo running!) Sure, 8K will have its role and one day 16K will too, but those displays will max out at maybe only be 3% to 5% of the market at any point, if that. Sorry. Unless you can figure out a way to upgrade the human eye...that's the way it's going to be I'm afraid. Unless something drastic changes, 4K is very likely here to stay.
@@hopperbopper sure they will, but they won't be doing it because they notice any difference in picture quality - they won't. We already know that because NO ONE can tell the difference between 4K and 8K at normal TV viewing distances. Will people eventually buy 8K sets because the price came down? Absolutely. But that's the ONLY reason why they will be buying them. Again, until you can improve on the human eye...
Streaming video has its limits too; data bandwidth.
@@hopperbopper I hear you, but I think you're missing a fundamental, underlying point here as well. Manufacturers really don't care if their added features actually provide any discernable or measurable benefit to consumers at all. Why? Because no matter what, they HAVE to release and sell a new generation of models with each and every year that comes to pass - and they HAVE to do it in VOLUME, especially if they are a publicly traded company with SHARHOLDERS to please. They HAVE to try and convince consumers that there is a benefit to upgrading, even if they know for a fact there isn't. We see this same thing happen literally every year in the home audio space most obviously. So, sure, companies will always push out new tech, regardless of whether or not it will be of any real benefit to consumers at all. That, you can count on!
Vincent is killing it hahah
Complete consoomer bait. Even more pointless than 8K 💀
It has a contrast ratio of 12000:1, which incidentally are the odds of you being able to afford this TV. It comes with two handles on each side to minimize the injury risk to repo men. As they say, there are three types of people in this world, but none of them have any 16K content.
16k is so blurry these days. We need at least 64k TVs.
I remember SONY Crystal LED already 16K in 2019. Nobody could afford it but I remember it. Costed like 5mil USD.
Nice!! 16K gaming is here ❤️🙌👏
Not yet.. even the 4090 can't display it.
omg couldn't see it to the end... got laughing tears in my eyes 🤣😂🤣
if there was no reflection in the tv it would be perfect
I need this mans videos more in my life.
"These pixels are finer than gal gadots *****"
🤣🤣🤣