You could reduce it further and say it's actually just paper and pen. And of course it depends how you use these... Plenty of people have todo lists and calendars without timeboxing.
@@RazorIance lol 😂 everything BUT the task in hand… I have spent decades trying to fix this. Not even AI can give me an insightful strategy, that’s not the typical self improvement technique
what ideology could have possibly been propagated via this? where you are essentially writing down tasks, grouping them, and then allocating them time slot.. very eager to know from you!
@@shloksuman8164 Well, the point is not whether this propagates ideology or not - it clearly doesn't. The point is whether the claim "most effective productivity method" is credible or not, and Harvard is used in the title to (I guess) provide such credibility. But because nowadays Harvard has two souls and only one of those souls is committed to evidence-based truth-seeking, this has implications for the alleged credibility of the claim. Do I trust that it's a productivity method? Sure. Do I trust that it's the most effective? It depends on which Harvard is saying so. That's all, really. I hope this clarifies your doubt.
@@RaulCasado-l9t this is internet, we are on youtube! 'clicks' matter here! people here use words to attract attention, get views,etc. and clickbait thumbnails are also used... surely the uploader was successful cuz u clicked and i too! it could be 'most' effective productivity method or it could not be! i clicked for the utility of the video ( or method described here )! i've heard of such things before and used this method earlier too , it works pretty fine for me atleast! So, I hope you will endeavour or try to search which harvard department was there behind this? if you find , let us know about it, or if you find better method, please mention about it too! i am open to learning! Don't get lost into semantics too much! Humans tend to use informal or exaggerated language! not everyone is always to the point , accurate, technical, refined, backing what they with data, rather they phrase things informally.
I would expect such an evaluation to be done by the Harvard business school. According to the best of my limited knowledge, they are probably credible with respect to productivity. I would not be surprised if they are doubtful when it comes to ethics and morals.
It's incredible how the simplest things are often the most useful.
This is just a todo list and a calendar lol?
Exactly lol
Yep.
correct! Sometimes teh big gap is between knowing it and actually doing it. LOL
it's even less than that
You could reduce it further and say it's actually just paper and pen. And of course it depends how you use these... Plenty of people have todo lists and calendars without timeboxing.
Clear, concise & accurate. Thanks!
Awesome 👏
I didn’t understand the last step
Hi, Im interested in your product. I hav some questions to see what might be my best fit?
such as?
ADHD entered the chat
not me spending 5 hours making my perfect list and everything look pretty and then not completing a single item on it
@@RazorIance lol 😂 everything BUT the task in hand… I have spent decades trying to fix this. Not even AI can give me an insightful strategy, that’s not the typical self improvement technique
Which font have you used in the template ?
Montserrat
Which Harvard department? One of those striving for knowledge, or one of those pushing an ideology?
what ideology could have possibly been propagated via this? where you are essentially writing down tasks, grouping them, and then allocating them time slot..
very eager to know from you!
@@shloksuman8164 Well, the point is not whether this propagates ideology or not - it clearly doesn't. The point is whether the claim "most effective productivity method" is credible or not, and Harvard is used in the title to (I guess) provide such credibility. But because nowadays Harvard has two souls and only one of those souls is committed to evidence-based truth-seeking, this has implications for the alleged credibility of the claim. Do I trust that it's a productivity method? Sure. Do I trust that it's the most effective? It depends on which Harvard is saying so. That's all, really. I hope this clarifies your doubt.
@@RaulCasado-l9t this is internet, we are on youtube! 'clicks' matter here! people here use words to attract attention, get views,etc. and clickbait thumbnails are also used... surely the uploader was successful cuz u clicked and i too! it could be 'most' effective productivity method or it could not be! i clicked for the utility of the video ( or method described here )! i've heard of such things before and used this method earlier too , it works pretty fine for me atleast!
So, I hope you will endeavour or try to search which harvard department was there behind this? if you find , let us know about it, or if you find better method, please mention about it too! i am open to learning! Don't get lost into semantics too much! Humans tend to use informal or exaggerated language! not everyone is always to the point , accurate, technical, refined, backing what they with data, rather they phrase things informally.
I would expect such an evaluation to be done by the Harvard business school. According to the best of my limited knowledge, they are probably credible with respect to productivity. I would not be surprised if they are doubtful when it comes to ethics and morals.
Pause to read the index at 0:08 and take a wild guess.
Which device is this?
Microsoft Surface Book
@@EdriansNotesSo sad they got rid of it! But thank you for the video!
po ra erripuuk
Mfks will do anything but work.