I have typically thought of myself as having Ne in my top 2 functions, largely because I am indecisive and like to keep my options open. According to these descriptions though, I relate more to Ni/Se. I do appreciate these simplified descriptions and the cutting through of a lot of the bs info out there. Great job!
Huzzah! I always liked Beebe's work. To me he has more of a spiritual view of typology, not relating the functions to direct cognition as he has typed cultures too (which are not a singular mind). He tries to show the spirit of each function and I think that's pretty neat.
He is relating the functions directly to different perspectives (introversion and extraversion) of the four basic types of cognition (thinking, feeling, sensing, intuition). He just associates them with archetypes within people and society. He does this because he notices a consistent pattern within types for each of the positions with a different flavor depending on the function, and how this manifests in society and in media. He says that the function attitudes are absolutely qualitative in nature (there is no inherent strength hierarchy based on position), but I disagree. I think that the functions are quantitative at their core and there is a strength hierarchy, and the qualitative nature he observes is an emergent property.
Your channel is fantastic and finally making clear to me so many things that were muddled by other MBTI content out there. Thank you! I hope more people will discover your channel.
i have some question anyway.. is these words only apply to top 2 of our value functions (dominant and creative functions)? or the child and anima also but with less dimension (like sosionics dimension concept of each blok)
After reading the book, I think your headers on those keywords are incorrect, and I think the middle column is swapped for the last column. If I remember correctly, the headers in the book were Persona, Ego, Self. They were not Persona, Individuated, Ego. This is a big difference, because the Ego and the Self are different things. The Ego is your conscious top four functions only, so you wont get to the root objective and fulfilment of the function (or Ego in general) without further development of the Shadow. That would be the Self. I will check the book later to confirm.
I have typically thought of myself as having Ne in my top 2 functions, largely because I am indecisive and like to keep my options open. According to these descriptions though, I relate more to Ni/Se.
I do appreciate these simplified descriptions and the cutting through of a lot of the bs info out there. Great job!
Much love Aimee, we missed yooooo, lock on positivity! The hater are sanguessugas that have to be percive as such
Welcome back aimee 😊
Awesome video Aimee!
Nice to see you back in the thick of typology
Huzzah! I always liked Beebe's work. To me he has more of a spiritual view of typology, not relating the functions to direct cognition as he has typed cultures too (which are not a singular mind). He tries to show the spirit of each function and I think that's pretty neat.
He is relating the functions directly to different perspectives (introversion and extraversion) of the four basic types of cognition (thinking, feeling, sensing, intuition). He just associates them with archetypes within people and society.
He does this because he notices a consistent pattern within types for each of the positions with a different flavor depending on the function, and how this manifests in society and in media. He says that the function attitudes are absolutely qualitative in nature (there is no inherent strength hierarchy based on position), but I disagree. I think that the functions are quantitative at their core and there is a strength hierarchy, and the qualitative nature he observes is an emergent property.
Your channel is fantastic and finally making clear to me so many things that were muddled by other MBTI content out there. Thank you! I hope more people will discover your channel.
Yay! Finally first. Love your content ❤
You are the best Aimee, thank you.
can't wait to see the next video. :)
Very informing!
Wow yes 100% agreed. i am Ni through and through
🥰 WELCOME BACK!
HAHAHAH SHES BACK!!! BUGAGAGAGA
Coincidentally, I stumbled across your IG post about these literally a few days ago. Huh. Excellent.
Amazing
Wait, Ariel has dreams? I didn’t even see them.
- Ni with my head in the sand over here
based on this video.. ENxJ and INxJ tends to know everything (kinda show of) ig lol
i have some question anyway..
is these words only apply to top 2 of our value functions (dominant and creative functions)? or the child and anima also but with less dimension (like sosionics dimension concept of each blok)
After reading the book, I think your headers on those keywords are incorrect, and I think the middle column is swapped for the last column. If I remember correctly, the headers in the book were Persona, Ego, Self. They were not Persona, Individuated, Ego. This is a big difference, because the Ego and the Self are different things. The Ego is your conscious top four functions only, so you wont get to the root objective and fulfilment of the function (or Ego in general) without further development of the Shadow. That would be the Self.
I will check the book later to confirm.
The columns are swapped, but the headers and associated words are also swapped along with it.