7:20 Serbia didn't gave a Dalmatia. Big powers(UK,France,Russia) promised that to Italy 1915. for joining to war against Austria Hungary... Soldiers from Bosnia and Croatia 1914. were sent against Serbia ( with others soldiers of AustroHungary). They lost. After that they sent them against Russia and Italy ( since 1915.)... AustroHungary took a many Serbs from Bosnia for hostages 1914-18.(like some insurance against Serbian rebelion) and they sent thousends Serbs to concentration camps like Doboj in Bosnia...
The high treason trial in Banja Luka (1915-1916) was the largest of 17 such trials in Bosnia and Herzegovina, conducted during the First World War. The process began at a time when the Kingdom of Serbia and the Entente powers were experiencing setbacks. 156 persons (Serbs) of various professions were accused - prominent politicians, teachers, students, merchants, priests, lawyers, etc. By the final verdict, pronounced in 1916; 16 persons were sentenced to death, 87 were sentenced to prison terms of 2 to 20 years. The remaining 53 people were acquitted...
In the West nobody speaks about this: Lukijan Bogdanović (10 May 1867. - 1 September 1913.) was the last Orthodox Patriarch of the Patriarchate of Karlovci and the Metropolitanate of Karlovci. He was assassinated and decapitated while walking alone along a river bank in Bad Gastein.He was a prominent benefactor and member of Privrednik.
During World War I, Doboj was the site of the largest Austro-Hungarian concentration camp.[5]According to the official figures, it held in total 45,791 people between 27 December 1915 and 5 July 1917, of which: 16,673 men from Bosnia and Herzegovina, 16,996 women and children from Bosnia and Herzegovina (mostly of Serb ethnicity), 9,172 soldiers and civilians (men, women, children) from the Kingdom of Serbia, 2,950 soldiers and civilians from the Kingdom of Montenegro. Some 12,000 people had died in this camp, largely due to malnutrition and poor sanitary conditions. By February 1916, the authorities began redirecting the prisoners to other camps. The Serbs from Bosnia were mostly sent to Győr (Sopronyek, Šopronjek/Шопроњек).[6] Most of the prisoners from Bosnia were entire families from the border regions of eastern Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is said that 5,000 families alone were uprooted from the Sarajevo district in eastern Bosnia along the border with the Kingdoms of Serbia & Montenegro.
I love your obscure histories. The stuff like “what was Peru like in WW2” etc and now this. Great narration, great story. I’m aware of the history your cover, but it doesn’t stop me from wanting to watch your uploads. Keep it up, most excellent! All the very best 👌
@@HistoryHustle one of my very good friends just emigrated to The Netherlands. I am sure she mentioned they are living near Utrecht. 2 children at school, I would be thrilled if they somehow ended up with you as a teacher😇
Stefan is just the governor when it comes to giving you the lowdown on historical angles from the twentieth century that others never do. Thank you for the best history channel on UA-cam 👏
I just love your segmented talks about these complex pieces of history! It really helps to break things up into smaller pieces to understand it better. I look forward to your next video as always Professor Stefan!
Kinda funny how a ton of muslim bosniacs left their country for Turkey after WW1 to escape anti-muslim persecutions only to become fully secularized after Ataturk took over the Anatolian remnants of the Ottoman Empire and abolished the caliphate.
Another great video, thank you very much for making it. As an intersting fact regarding Bosnian soldiers fighting in WW1 on Italian front. The first mosque in Slovenian territory was built in 1916 near the village of Log pod Mangrtom in NW of nowadays Slovenia. The mosque was built by Bosnian Muslim soldiers of AH army fighting on the Soča (Isonzo) front. Close to the mosque was military cemetery. Italian authorities which annexed this area demolished the mosque in 1920s. The only remaining artefact of this mosque are some photographs preserved by the locals.
If you can read german and ever come to Norrland (Sweden) i have a great book for you on this subject. Great stuff man and btw i lived in Beverwijk haha. Keep doing a good job.
The Austrians had the Statuta Valachorum (Vlach Statues) from 1630 AD these Orthodox settlers from the East coming into Croatia from Bosnia were Vlach Orthodox from Wallachia now in Romania and not from Serbia.
@@damirblazevic4823ujkane lako ukucaj "map of Europe 814" Sve mape su strane, lepo se vidi da Srbi naseljavaju celu Bosnu i većinu Dalmacije do Splita, nadalje i sam Einhard, istoričar i biograf Karla Velikog je napisao da Sorabi/Srbi naseljavaju većinu bivše Rimske provincije Dalmacije, ujkane niko i ne spominje, čak se Ljudevit Posavski spominje kao Slavenski knez a ne Hrvat, a i u vašoj "povijesti" piše da je Ljudevit Posavski 821 pobegao iz Siska, bežeći od Franaka, preko reke Vrbas kod Srba u zaštitu
Dude thats lie 100%. Fck serbian mitoman lies. Serbs are turkish soldiers. Bosnia is Croatian Kingdom and some ortodox christians escape ottoman lands and later in late 19st they "become " serbs"
"Big picture" without much detail for the uninitiated!! One people lived in Bosnia for thousands of years (most Bosnians are Slavized Illyrians)! The Romans broke their teeth many times until they conquered Bosnia! Many centuries later, Bosnians were members of the specific "Church of Bosnia" for centuries! As well as Bosnian rulers, kings! A small part were Catholics and Orthodox, but the same people, genetically, certainly! Many centuries later, the Turkish Empire conquered the Balkans, it's a very long story (Bosnian king Tvrtko sent his twenty thousand warriors to battle in Kosovo and the best military leader Vlatko Vukovic) to help the Serbs because then it was a "Christian coalition"! BUT Serbian leaders made a deal with the Turks even before the battle to have positions in the future Turkish empire on their territory! Only the Bosnians fought bravely there! After the Turks conquered Bosnia, in the following decades more than half of the population converted to Islam? Why? Nobody forced them, it was voluntary! That's why under the Turkish occupier, if you're a Muslim, you were in a way equal and a Turk couldn't take your sister or daughter like a non-Muslim! And with that act, they took the majority of Bosnians under their wing, covered both Orthodox and Catholics! Centuries have passed and Islam is deeply rooted in Bosnia! However, Bosnians often raised revolts, which were often suppressed by the Turks together with the Serbs! In the 19th century, with the strengthening of Serbia and the weak Turkish empire, Bosnian Orthodox converted to Serbs and Bosnian Catholics converted to Croats! A well-known Serbian nationalist wrote that Catholic Bosniaks, Mohammedan Bosniaks and Bosnians of our Orthodox faith live in Bosnia.@@HistoryHustle
You could've mentioned that Bosnian regiments were elite force of KuK army, most decorated unit of KuK army was Bosnian, they were praised by their Austrian superiors so much that there's march song dedicated to them named "Die Bosniaken kommen" which is played on special occasions by today's Austrian army... Other than that pretty nice video, hope you liked it here :)
My grandfather was with the Bosnians in Galicia. Before the assault on the Russian trenches, everyone was served with rum. Once there was no rum and it was necessary to attack. The Bosnians refused and started chanting "Nema ruma nema šturma" translated as ''no rum no assault''.
Fantastic historical coverage work about Bosnia 🇧🇦 Herzegovina region during WW1..thank you an amazing ( history Hustle) channel. Introduced by 🙏Sir Stefan
well, like "fantastic" and "awesome" the meaning of words has changed in modern times.. people back then didn't think WW1 was "great" in present day parlance.
Very good and accurate video with a couple of mistakes. Firstly, Internment camps for Serb civilians were actually the first concentration camps in Europe. There were 8 camps all around the A-H empire. Doboj, Mauthauen, Arad, Frauenkirchen, to name a few. More than 200.000 children, women, elderly were killed. Secondly, Bosniaks haven’t existed at the time, only Serbs and Croats, of which there were 2 religions Christians: (Catholics and Orthodox) and Muslims. Communists will make up a new nation in 1971 - Muslim, who will became Bosniaks in 1990s. Even though I’m not from the region, I did my master in WW1 covering the Balkans.
Very instructive, but something needs to be added for complete truth. During the Austro-Hungarian rule, Serbs were the most numerous population in Bosnia. Until 1971, Serbs were the majority in Sarajevo, so at the time of the assassination, Serbs were certainly the majority in Sarajevo. The arrival of the heir to the throne in Bosnia and Sarajevo was actually a provocation for the Serbs. During the first and especially the second world war, our neighbors Bosniaks and Croats did everything to help the occupiers in exterminating the Serbs. When you add to that the fact that today's Bosniaks are actually a Slavic population that converted to Islam after the Ottoman occupation and actually became collaborators of the occupiers who have been harassing local Christians for the past 400 years, it is a miracle that there are any Serbs in Bosnia today. 
As usual, your mantras about our mythomania. Although, a mythomaniac can only be one who has myths, because myths are something that greatly influences the formation of a nation, legends as well. If you had them, you probably would have created them much earlier and not in the early nineties. Just to add, I just transferred the data from the official census in Bosnia in 1910, which was carried out by Austria-Hungary. So from their archives. I also transferred data from the official census in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1961 related to Sarajevo. Who really wants can easily check. I also mentioned the 400 years of Ottoman rule and your subjugation, did I make a mistake there? That it is not a myth. 
The population of the district of Sarajevo, according to the 1921 Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes religious population census: Serbian Orthodox Christians 55,477 (38.6%) Sunni Muslims 50,270 (34.9%) Roman Catholic Christians 29,395 (20.4%) Others 8,768 (6.1%)
I hope it is common knowledge that modern nations did not emerge until the 19th century. Certainly there were no nationally determined people in Bosnia at that time either. Nor the Croats, since I see that you did not mention them. At that time, the ancestors of today's Serbs, Croats and Bosniaks lived there. 
2:02 The black hand was funded by the serbian military, trained by the serbian military, and the leader of Black hand was a high ranking serbian officer.
@@HistoryHustle Wiki page of Dragutin Dimitrijević, the highest ranking Serbian military intelligence officer, and leader of the Black Hand. Dragutin Dimitrijević was also was responsible for the Serbian may coup which was a military coup that killed King Alexandrea and installed King peter, who he had ties to, so the Black hand had a lot of political power when it was founded a few years later.
Interesting how today Croats are fully aligned with west (back then you could call Habsburgs the west), Bosniaks still want to be the part of that west and Serbs are still anti-west even after more then 100 years later. Bosnia as a result, still in no mans land 😢
@@HistoryHustle Well, knowing what my country could become if all of it's people actually worked together instead of what we have now I don't think it's rough at all. Right now we have a country where serbs are not even hiding that they are trying to secede and join Serbia. Croats that love Croatia more then their own land and are actively sabotaging anything positive in Bosnia just in case it doesn't get good as Croatia is. And bosniaks whose politicans are so deep in mud called corruption that occupies them alot more then actually fighting for the country. Like I said, I'm 28 and living here my whole life, half of my friends have moved to western europe or usa due to lack of normal standards here in Bosnia, and that's bad healthcare, political instability, low salaries, corruption, lack of security, constant threat of new war etc etc... My friends are gone and I don't blame them, you don't even have to live here to realize why this country is a no mans lans - just read daily news from Bosnia and it will be enough to understand.. Unfortunately
Ah yes serbs , They were so 'west' hating back then that they were the only one that had fully recognized state by the 'west' with the modern military resembling Frensh, but sure MUSLIMS were 'pro-western' back then, if it was up to them they would have restablished ottoman rule back along side the sharia law
I did similar in 1986 I hitch hiked from Belgrade to Zagreb then I was in Brac for a week had a great time, also back in Zagreb in 1991 just before war broke out when two policemen were shot on the Plitvic lakes, we were told by local people trouble was coming...Yugoslavia was beautiful and friendly, so sad what happened
Even after 110 years, everything is the same...Bosnia is not a country, the Bonian Serbs are for Serbia, the Bosnian Croats are for Croatia, and the Bosniaks don't even know what they would do...and who they would do with. They don't know themselves. If Bosnia could be a country, it would Austrians did.
@@HistoryHustle My comment are facts that can be easily verified, I don't live in Bosnia nor am I interested in Bosnia, but I follow the situation in the Balkans. In that quasi-state, there is a big division into Republika Srpska, where Serbs are the majority, and the Federation, where Muslims live...Serbs they threaten to join Serbia. Frustration is in the eye of the beholder..
Gavrilo father Petar Princip was villager and post office worker born 1860,,he was involved in uprising aggains Ottomans in 1875-1877 in Bosnia .After uprising he return to his village .He died 26.1.1940
You don’t know anything about South Slavic peoples.You must be Ustash or radical Muslim.Serbs were majority in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Dalmatia,Slavonia..Nearly 500 years Turkish had destroying Slavic land.Lot os people were forced to convert ti Islam.Muslim from Bosnia and Herzegovina together with Croatian never uprising against Austr Hungary and Turkey.Serbs liberated them twice with high prices of a 75% ofSerbs male population were kild iWWI😢😢😢
Young Bosnia was not Serbian nationalist organisation because it had a lot of Muslim and Croat members but today even among Serbs people believe that Young Bosnia was a Serbian nationalist organisation
Habsburg FM Berchtold felt he'd been humiliated by Serbian successes in the Balkan wars and sharp political criticism that he'd failed to contain Serbian expansion, so he wanted to appear tough in 1914. Emotions are always in there somewhere.
Does anyone know if or where information of what may have happened to Gavrilo Princip family or village that would have caused his determination to become a terrorist? Like did something happen to his relations; or stories of horror that might have galvanised him into action? Or was he just a lone wolf looking for purpose?
@@HistoryHustle Without doing the research; I don't believe Serbia was ever occupied by the Austrian, Hungarian Empire; nor launched raids/pogroms against the Serbs. I would have thought being Orthodox Christian they would have more in common with the former compared to the Turks. Maybe the Habsburgs funded nationalist (?) groups to cleanse Serbs from territory?
Gavrilo Princip was brought up on Serbian myths and stories about the Battle of Kosovo of 1389 AD. Princip also was a T.B sufferer who main goal was to go out in a blaze of glory, as he saw it. In prison he was horrified at the outcome of his actions especially for Serbia. Bosnia actually was never a part of the medieval Serbian Kingdom which made the whole thing hard to understand unless you read about Serbia's "Greater Serbia" plans.
@@TheSouth-j7f According to Wiki; apparently he regretted nothing. It is said that he believed in a united Serbia for all Slavs. This included Croatia, Slovenia; to have all Slavic people free from Austria. Were these the views of a fantasist? Like how the Czechs and Slovaks were once united but are "different" enough to split once the opportunity arose. Left-wing anarchist or Nationalist patriot? I can understand why a people would want to free themselves from Imperial rule; but was that rule violent enough to galvanise a person to conduct an assassination attempt that would surely cost him his life? And why wouldn't Serbia hand him to the Austrians even if it was against their constitution? Better him (a criminal) then a full scale war!
@@Adam-zq2mw Princip was not in Serbia. He was caught in Sarajevo immediately after the assassination. Austria demanded that Austrian officials conduct an investigation on the territory of Serbia. That was a direct violation of Serbia's sovereignty and she could not accept it.
My bosnian great great grandpa fought against russians first, then ,i assume, after capitulation of russia he was sent to solun. He survived till 1970-s, almost 90 years and i visit his grave in tuzla
incredible to think that the Archduke and his wife were killed because their car had no REVERSE gear... the time taken to turn the car around when it took the wrong turn was enough for the assassin.. the Balkans was a hot spot for a long time following the Ottomans being booted out and new nations squabbling over borders. the hot mess that was Yugoslavia created after WW2 did not help matters either.. Another great video covering aspects most of us know little about.. :)
9:30 Hi, Stefan! You said “anarchy reinged on the contryside”… I think what you meant by "anarchy" is chaos and violence. Ok… But you must be aware that anarchy for the ancaps is something like free-market (or black market), free association / dissociation, and non-agression. 🕊 Libertarian cheers, and obrigado! ヽ(͡◕ ͜ʖ ͡◕)ﾉ 🍀 🇧🇷
Ah yes, I understand. Whenever it is stated that there was anarchy it means chaos. When there was anarchism that's sonething else. Cheers from Recife 🇧🇷
Now we have another loop where history repeats itself and it is highly expected that Bosnia once more will break with the Republika Srpska is ready to get its independance and unite with Serbia. To be honest with you i do not expect it to be like the separation of Czechoslovakia.
It's not true that only Muslims wire the red fez. ALL OF THEM WORE THE RED FEZ. The guy at 3:53 is a Orthodox Serb and wears the red Fez. I'm seeing you still have a bit of a problem with understanding the dynamics in the Balkans. I can help you if you want. I'm a bit of a specialist on the matter.
It did exist before 1992 but it was a Croat community in Hungary (in Hungarian: Bosnyákok) who escaped Bosnia hundreds of years ago to get away from the Ottoman Turks and who settled in Hungary. The Bosniak muslims are a different group of people (a mix of converted Croats, Serbs and Turks etc) but who have sadly usurped this Croat communities old name. The muslims were only recognised as an ethnic group in 1968 by the Yugoslav communist party. The "muslims" later changed their name to "Bosnian muslims" and then changed their name again this time to "Bosniak" (muslims) in the last few decades.
@@TheSouth-j7f Not true, search up what nacertanije say and the newspaper Bosnjak, Bosniaks lived in Hum, Vrbas, Una, Drina, etc Bosniaks are not Croats nor Serbs..
@@AmarEcd1233brother, the history doesn't lie. Mehmed Pasha Sokollu = Sokolovic. Omer Pasha Latas = Mihajlo Latas. Whether converted whether by force, coercion or persuasion, all have Serbian origin.
1:35 Austro-Hungary didn't have documents to prove that Serbia was behind the assassination. However, it was hard to believe that Serbia had nothing to do with it. This is why Austro-Hungary asked to examine the documents on Serbian soil. Tihomir Rajčić, in his new book BEOGRADSKE TAJNE I. SVJETSKOG RATA (2023), discusses this issue. Recently, Serbia published 40 books containing documentation from the First World War and earlier. We can now say that Serbia was behind the assassination. Nikola Pašić, through Vojislav Tankosić and the Black Hand, organized this assassination. Serbia financed and organized state terrorism in Bosnia and Herzegovina. For example, four days before the assassination, Nikola Pašić wrote to the Serbian Ministry of Defense, stating that all their allies, when they found out what their officers and subofficers were doing in Bosnia, would expel Serbia from the community and leave Austro-Hungary to deal with Serbia as they wished.
@@HistoryHustle Archduke Franz Ferdinand had the idea to reshape Austro-Hungary (trialism). Croatia would have an area of the state Država Slovenaca, Hrvata i Srba that was created at 29.10.1918. Serbia from the 19th century had geostrategic ideology (Ilija Garašanin), linguistic ideology (Vuk Karadžić), cultural mainstream (newspapers, books, educational system) ect. to set free Serbian Orthodox people in Bosnia and Herzegovina from the Austro-Hungary in the form of territorial enlargement of Serbia. In their propaganda this was also valid to all South Slavic people, Croats, and Bosnian muslims, they were Serbs in their propaganda. So all Serbian culture opposed the idea of trialism and was ready to die against this idea. Secret organizations (eq. Crna ruka) puted this goal ahead of the interests of Serbia as a state. They have controlled the Serbian state to a large extent. Even before they have killed Serbian rulers if they would not go along with their goals. Calculation was that Russia will probably back them up in a potential war with Austro-Hungary. In the end they rejected the Austro-Hungarian Ultimatum and the war was about to begin. Creation of Yugoslavia in 1918 was the realisation of the Serbian goal from the 19th century to a large extent. You can read about Serbian culture in this regard in the short book published in English: Branimir Anzulović Heavenly Serbia: From Myth to Genocide, New York University Press, New York, 1999. Keywords: Ilija Garašanin and Vuk Karadžić. Feel free to contact Croatian historian who has written a book about Serbian responsibility for the First World War, Tihomir Rajčić, rajcic66@yahoo.com.
Just don't lie. The largest concentration of revolutionaries was right there where all of the action was taking place, where all of you "southern Slavs" were languishing under Hapsburg domination. Croat revolutionaries were very vocal in their own right, but as an institution the pre-war Kingdom of Serbia had a very prominent national state orientation, did not have much regard for you all outside of her own natural sovereign borders and was still less interested in any of your big wind secondary, European imported ideologies, like anarchism and socialism. Or Vatican sponsored messianism, for that matter. Austrians were just looking for an excuse to expand in to the Balkans for geopolitical expediency, because they were a fast decaying empire with massive internal instability, and who feared losing lands bordering with Russia if they didn't "act in time", hence why they forcefully annexed Bosnia in 1908. For them it was the springboard from where they intended to launch further military expansion across the Drina river and along the Danube. There simply isn't one good reason to prove why pre-war Serbia would have seeked to provoke a war with the Austrians, at all.
You are wrong by calling Bosnian Muslims in this time "Bosniaks". That simply didnt exist. In that time Bosniaks/Bosnians were: Serbs (majority, ortodox), PoTurice (converted to Turks, muslims) and Croats (catholics). Only in 1992. Muslims, PoTurice monopolized name of Bosnia by theft only for them.
Serbs and Croats did not exist in Bosnia before 1918 y and after 1918 Bosnyaks orthodox started to call themselves Sebes and Bosnyaks Catholics started to call themselves Croats since churches/priests came from Serbia and Croatia had too much of influence on our peasants !
@@avdohodzic775 What is dna genetic prove for your claims that we Bosniak Serbs are different from others Serbs? Lies, we are similar dna, same nation!
@@HistoryHustle Its relevant because who dont know situation would wrongly think that Croats came from Croatia, that Serbs came from Serbia and that only Bosniak Muslims are natives in Bosnia. Its not true, Serbs and Croats are natives to Bosnia, not invaders from other regions
These are Bosnian Croats, Bosnian Serbs, etc. And someone else gave me crap about saying Bosnian muslims. The Balkans remains a heavily polarized region which manifests itself in comment sections.
no WW1- no Croatian state, no Slovenian state, no Slovakian state, no Czhechia state and no Rumania in it's current borders. WW1 brought about the destruction of empires and that was the most profound progress of humanity! oh and what quasi historians continually forget to consider is- what if one of the previous attempts by a Muslim or a Croat had succeeded?
@HistoryHustle meaning, how would you blame Serbia if a Croat and a Muslim succeeded in killing the megalomenical turd!? but I guess the most murderess "people" Germans would have come up with something
@HistoryHustle my point is the most genocidal nation in the history of humanity (Germans) - 6 + million Jews, 20+ million Russians and God knows how many Poles and Czekoslovakians - didn't need a fucking reason to start a war! just a fucking excuse and not to mention the death of one third of my people at the hands of the most evil nation in history (!) .if any race had a reason to die of shame it is the Germans! and if any nation had a reason to shut the fuck it is the Germans! Austria and deuchhfuckindland
CONSPIRACY THEORY: Archduke's car licence plate "AIII 118", which some have read as the date the eventual Armistice was signed. Pulling the digits apart differently can be interpreted as 11 11 18. The Armistice was signed on 11 November 1918.
@@HistoryHustle yes his car is still in the museum with that licence plate which is also the date the war would end....there are pictures of it you can see online..what are the chances...
Hungary was stopped by Bosnia from expanding to the Sea a millenia ago. They were literally crapped on and embarrassed by Bosnians, making the ultimate difference where Hungary is now a tiny landlocked state instead of a large empire.
@@HistoryHustle There were other factors but it was still Bosnia that stopped Hungary from expanding back than. Today they support Serb separatism while disrespecting Bosnia's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
@@tarik6990 The Kingdom of Croatia including Bosnia joined Hungary in an union in 1102 AD. If you look at a regional map its Croatia (Slavonia) then Bosnia ,then Herzegovina then the Croatian coastline (Dalmatia) again. So are you talking about the muslim Turkish point of view ?
How is Serbia's involvement debatable? Gavrilo Princip was a junior member of a larger group co-ordinated by the Black hand which in turn was funded by the Russia Tsarist Ohrana ...
In that time we was autrougarian colony and some mans islamic catolics and ortodox send to die for germans aginst Brothers nations slovanian nations. Sad and hard history
Bosnians Bogumil who converted to orthodoxy were given a name serb vlah...Bosnian who converted to Christianity influence of Pope are called Croats..Bosnian who stayed Bogumil but later converted to Islam are Bosniaks.
I was wondering but can you do a video on Albania and Greece in the First World War and I am asking because Albania is an interesting country in the First World War because its ruler at the time of ww1 was a German but Albania also had an important role/ part to play in ww1 and this role/ part was that after the central powers overran Serbia the Serbian army had to retreat through Albania and then the central powers took over it however the Serbs would return to Albania as the Serbians and the allies established a stable line however Greece also played an important role in ww1 as without Greece the allies would have not been able to land in Thessaloniki and they wouldn’t have launched the vardar offensive.
@@baguettedestroyer4145 That is correct Herzegovina gets its name from the German word "Herzog" meaning a Duke. So Herzegovina means land of the Duke. While Bosnia gets its name from the Bosna river.
Nobody says that Serbian secret service organized agents, to unite Serbs out of Serbia and organized young guys to kill Austrian duke that was supposed to be next ruller. The idea was to take Bosnia, Monte Negro, Macedonia, etc. They caused WW1, and WW2 followed. If you ask Serbian historians, they are innocent but brave victims.
@@nashbridges-cu6dy Probably because Croats had their own parliament or assembly for centuries (the Croatian Sabor) within the Austrian Empire ( and before that within the Kingdom of Hungary).
@@TheSouth-j7f really? But then why Croats made State of Slovenians Croats and Serbs then, why its not just Croatia? And why didn't the World recognize state of shs?
@@nashbridges-cu6dy60% of politics who where for that conutry were masonic lodge supported with great masonic lodges in Paris and London. It was there projects. Serbs are know for masonic becuase they started first word war for interest of London geopolitics. Croatians are Catholic's and Church forbids masonic work!
Big picture!! Bosnians as one people live for thousands of years in Bosnia (Bosnians are Slavized Illyrians)! Many centuries later, Bosnians were members of the "Bosnian Church", as were Bosnian kings!Many centuries later, the Turkish empire conquers the Balkans! The Bosnian king Tvrtko sent his twenty thousand warriors to fight in Kosovo and the best military leader Vlatko Vuković, because at that time it was a "Christian coalition"! BUT the Serbian leaders agreed with the Turks to have positions in the future Turkish empire! After the Turks conquered Bosnia, more than half of the population of Bosnia converted to Islam? Why? No one forced them, it was voluntary! Because under the Turkish occupier, if you are a Muslim, you were somehow equal and a Turk could not take your sister or daughter as a non-Muslim! By that act, by converting to Islam, the Bosnian Muslims placed the majority of Bosnian Orthodox and Bosnian Catholics under their protection. ! Centuries have passed and Islam is deeply rooted in Bosnia! However, Bosnians often raised revolts, which were often suppressed by the Turks together with the Serbs! In the 19th century, with the strengthening of Serbia and the weakening of the Turkish Empire, the Bosnian Orthodox became Serbs, and the Bosnian Catholic became Croats! The well-known Serbian nationalist Ilija Garasanin wrote in his Book Nacertanije that Bosniaks Catholics,Bosniaks Mohammedans and Bosniaks of our Orthodox faith live in Bosnia!! Yes, in certain periods, serfs from Serbia came to Bosnia (who today come to America as Mexicans) and yes, they left their roots, that is 5-6 percent of the people in Bosnia, the majority of Serbs in Bosnia today are the autochthonous Bosnian people as well as today's croatians i! Famous writers Ivo Andrić and Meša Selimović never mentioned Serbs or Croats in their novels, but Bosnians...and where necessary it was emphasized that they were Bosnian Christians!
Bosnia was part of the Roman Catholic world (Croatia) at the time of the religious Great Schism in 1054 AD. The religious border was the river Drina which happened to be the old internal West/East Roman Empire border. This was internationally agreed between Rome and Constantinople ( as the Serbian Orthodox church didn't exist then). So much for your Dobrica Ćosić doctrine style history.
You have such a shollow grasp on Croatian / Bosnian history, i would even go as far as assuming you have Pro Serbian / Communist tenancies. Do you use Wikipedia as your source for referencing? Did you know prior to Ottoman expansion into Europe that Bosnia was majority Catholic. After the Ottoman fall a vacuum was left allowing Serbian Orthodoxy and self delusion to move in? (including Mintenegrin and Macedonian interference) 7:30 The Hapsbergs (Austria) were in serious consideration of sharing a Triune crown with Croatia and Hungry, but Hungary was vehemently opposed to this idea. Immediatelly after WW1, Croatian entered into a (little known) union called the "STATE of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs" which was different to the "KINGDOM of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes" (Jugoslavia 1) But i guess you're best at teaching UA-cam and High School students and that real facts dont matter to you or your deciples. I think it best if you leave this region of the world to the real historians who are willing to give an unbiased assesment with impecable referencing that are able to delve well beyond 100 years of history. But i guess you wont as you have a set agenda for this region. Btw, please stop referencing Slovenia and Croatian as "Balkan", our long standing and rich histories are nowhere close to "Balkan" except for the Serbianisation of the last 100 years.
@@nashbridges-cu6dy The State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs was a political entity that was constituted in October 1918 they joined the Kingdom of Serbia to form the new state of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes ( later renamed to Yugoslavia in 1929).
Austria-Hungary occupied Serbian land (Bosnia) and incidents and intolerance were to be expected. I don't why the Germans cannot understand that the Serbian people will never suffer their imperialism and colonialism with assimilation and crimes. The worst were the paramilitary formations composed mainly of Bosnian Muslims called Šuckors who killed Serbian civilians.
Bosnians and Albanians came into being as shock troops for the Ottomans, Europeans who converted for special treatment in the Caliphate. after Ottomans sent packing, these groups became problematic in the Balkans
@coling3957 I think you need to do a little more, no make that A LOT more reading about BiH and Albanian history my friend and stop listening to this History Hustle / Pro-Serbian supporter. Don't you realise he has hustle in his title for a reason.
For the 20th time: Stop naming the Bosniaks by their religion while naming the others by their ethnicity! Not all Bosniaks are muslims. Only people that use that name these days are Serbian and Croatian revisionist and seccesionist politicians. Just stop it! It's not that hard!!!!
Paul I Šubić of Bribir (Croatian: Pavao I. Šubić Bribirski, Hungarian: bribiri I. Subics Pál; c. 1245 - 1 May 1312) was Ban of Croatia between 1275 and 1312, and Lord of Bosnia from 1299 AD. After Paul dies his son Mladen took over. Mladen II Šubić of Bribir (Croatian: Mladen II Šubić Bribirski, Hungarian: bribiri Subics Mladen; c.1270 - c.1341), a Croatian leader and member of the Šubić noble family, was a Ban of Croatia and Lord of all of Bosnia from 1312 AD. So, Croats have been in Bosnia a long time, since the 7th century.
The current Bosniaks usurped the Bosniak name from the Christian Bosniaks who were ethnic Croats who fled Bosnia hundreds of years ago to get away from the Ottoman Turks. These Croats from Bosnia settled in Hungary were they still call themselves Bosniaks (Croats) to this day. The Bosniak muslims are a different case. The muslims were first recognised as an ethnic group in 1968 by the Yugoslav communist party. They later changed their named to "Bosnian muslims" and then changed their name again in the last few decades to Bosniak (muslims).
You can see lilies on the shield/coat of arms in his profile picture. They have stolen it from the Serbs, specifically the Nemanjić dynasty. They have stolen everything from the Serbs, including the language. A bunch of wonnabes who is desperately trying to create a nation but are lacking everything.thx for everything u do ! Nice work!
@@HistoryHustle You can see lilies on the shield/coat of arms in his profile picture. They have stolen it from the Serbs, specifically the Nemanjić dynasty. They have stolen everything from the Serbs, including the language. A bunch of wonnabes who is desperately trying to create a nation but are lacking everything.thx for your work, well done !
Serbia got statehood by help of Russia, Croatia became a state by help of America and NATO , Bosnia had many enemies, struggled but became a state and still have internal political problems since one part of Bosnyaks orthodox and Bosnyaks Catholics under influence of nationalists and churches from Serbia and Croatia still work to destroy Bosnia. Bosnyaks patriots want to form Bosnia as a stable, modern , democratic country Republic of Bosna and join EU and NATO !
Excellent video, starting with the Turkish occupiers whom they faithfully served, fought and killed for them as janissaries. While only the Serbs in Bosnia raised revolts against the Turkish occupation. Well, through the new occupier of Austria, when the Muslims of course serve the occupier this time as Schutzkorps! Where the Serbs again only revolted against the occupation, so in WW2, as you guessed again, the faithful servants of the new occupiers, the clerical fascist Ustasha and the SS of the German Nazis... Is muslim ! And again, the Serbs revolted and the Muslims faithfully served the Nazis! In the war in Bosnia, the servants of the US NATO occupiers, just like today... So whoever occupied Bosnia, starting with the Turks, had faithful servants, in the Muslims from Bosnia. And of course all the occupiers are aware of that, who will serve them faithfully. Only for all the occupiers and their Muslim "Bosniak" servants... The target has never changed, it has always remained the same, it is always only the Serbs. From the Turks to the Austrians, Nazi Germany and the Ustasha, to the US and NATO today. They are always the occupiers in Bosnia they saw the Serbs as the only problem for them! And convert Islamists, Muslims as faithful servants, in the realization of hegemony and occupation! Very interesting historical facts!
@@HistoryHustle I watched your video about WW2 even before. Quite well done. Except for some mistakes in the form of quoting Yugoslav communist historiography, you said to your heart that it was the Yugoslav view in the form of the alleged "7 offensives"... Which is a pure fabrication, unfortunately generally accepted both in the east and in the west... Both with the Yugoslav Army (D. Mihailović's Chetniks) and with the partisan movement, there was a certain collaboration with the Germans during WW2. The only problem is that the partisan collaboration with the Germans and Ustashas was concealed after the war in the form of communist propaganda. However, look at the March negotiations in 1943. There was also cooperation between the Partisan movement and the Germans near Višegrad. And that was to get behind the Chetniks, the Germans missed them... What Koča Popović, one of the Partisan generals during the war, described in his book. The same Koča Popović participated in the March 1943 negotiations with the Ustashas and the Germans... But I agree with you that those were the only two liberation movements. Everyone else was fascist! Fascists were formed in Yugoslavia during WW2 along with of course the German occupier, the Italian occupier...Also the Ustashas who were Croats and Muslims. The so-called "Bosniaks" under that name, let me remind you, have existed only since 1993. Since they changed their name several times, call them "nations" and converted more times in history than they changed their socks. As well as the Albanians who compose it as well exclusively the fascist movements of SS Skanderbeu and Ballista ... Also, a part of the Muslims from Bosnia who were not in the Ustasha were also part of the SS troops, more precisely the SS Handjar division, and also the Muslims on the territory of Serbia in the Raška region were also part of the German Nazi occupation apparatus ... Muslims, Croats and Albanians mostly belonged to fascist formations during WW2. While in the anti-fascist movements, the Partisan Movement and the Yugoslav Army in the Motherland, they were at the level of statistical error. Also, the same Ustasha formations and the SS Hanjar Division in the NDH committed genocide against the Serbian people first of all, but also the Jewish and Roma people. Which is a very well-known fact to you. Officially, they were killed in camps, pits, on doorsteps... With a knife, a sledgehammer, a bayonet... In a monstrous way, at least 350,000 Serbs were killed. Jasenovac is one of about 30 camps. Including several camps for children, which even Hitler himself did not have! Gideon Greif wrote the book Jasenovac, the Balkan Auschwitz. Except that Auschwitz was a "children's playground" for Jasenovac. Because even the most hardened German and Italian fascists were appalled at the Ustasha crimes. Things are very clear there, I don't know what is really not clear to you?! A certain type of collaboration also exists among the Serbs, in the form of General Nedić's movement. But as you yourself said, it was in the German occupation zone, which included only a small part of today's Serbia, and the Germans were in charge. His formations do not participate in battles outside Serbia. Nor did Muslims commit crimes against Croats. There is also Dimitrije Ljotić with his Kvisling movement... Which also did not operate outside of Serbia and the German occupation zone... But unlike the Croats, Muslims, and Albanians, who 90% in fascist units. Serbs joined Nedić's and Ljotić's movement at the level of a statistical error. Perhaps a total of up to 5% of the Serbian population was with Nedić's and Ljotić's movements. The rest were part of the Partisan movement, over 90% of the Partisan movement until the fall of Italy in 1943 were Serbs! And practically around 97-98% at Mihailović's. The Muslims we are talking about made up about 2% of the partisan movement. And there were about 1% of them at Mihailovic. These are facts that you can check very easily. So there is no one-sided, two-sided or three-sided view of history. There is only one history! He also doesn't know. what is not clear to you about the actions of Muslims or today the so-called "Bosniak" during the Turkish occupation when they converted, as Turkish servants, to Islam, which was brought by the Turkish occupier to Bosnia and Serbia. And now they bear Turkish names, and profess the religion they received from the occupiers. As janissaries, ages and beys served the Turks faithfully for practically 500 years... They fought for the Turkish occupier, the target was practically exclusively, and the "Bosniak" as a puppet of the Turks, as well as the Turkish occupier, were exclusively Serbs! Who raised rebellions and fought as Hajduks ,committees and Chetniks and insurgents against the "Bosniaks" and their Turkish masters. Serbia liberated itself from the Turks. Later, in the Balkan wars and after WW1, the Serbian army also liberated the present-day territories of Croatia, Bosnia and Slovenia, Macedonia... From the Austrian and earlier Turkish occupiers. When the Turks left, Bosnia was annexed by the Austro-Hungarian occupier. And again the "Bosniaks" waged war as servants and killed Serbian civilians, at the expense of the new boss, this time not as janissaries but as Schutzkorps at the expense of the Austro-Hungarian occupier... Both before and during WW1. So things are very clear, I don't see anything unclear. These are all historical facts that can be easily verified.
Croatia WW1:
ua-cam.com/video/g1waqX9Pfcw/v-deo.htmlsi=t5Dy79v6Z7QrUy9K
Serbia WW1:
ua-cam.com/video/Z6ubtSJlyag/v-deo.htmlsi=RhF1oRGaMJ2X2yBz
7:20 Serbia didn't gave a Dalmatia. Big powers(UK,France,Russia) promised that to Italy 1915. for joining to war against Austria Hungary...
Soldiers from Bosnia and Croatia 1914. were sent against Serbia ( with others soldiers of AustroHungary).
They lost. After that they sent them against Russia and Italy ( since 1915.)...
AustroHungary took a many Serbs from Bosnia for hostages 1914-18.(like some insurance against Serbian rebelion) and they sent thousends Serbs to concentration camps like Doboj in Bosnia...
The high treason trial in Banja Luka (1915-1916) was the largest of 17 such trials in Bosnia and Herzegovina, conducted during the First World War. The process began at a time when the Kingdom of Serbia and the Entente powers were experiencing setbacks. 156 persons (Serbs) of various professions were accused - prominent politicians, teachers, students, merchants, priests, lawyers, etc. By the final verdict, pronounced in 1916; 16 persons were sentenced to death, 87 were sentenced to prison terms of 2 to 20 years. The remaining 53 people were acquitted...
In the West nobody speaks about this: Lukijan Bogdanović (10 May 1867. - 1 September 1913.) was the last Orthodox Patriarch of the Patriarchate of Karlovci and the Metropolitanate of Karlovci. He was assassinated and decapitated while walking alone along a river bank in Bad Gastein.He was a prominent benefactor and member of Privrednik.
During World War I, Doboj was the site of the largest Austro-Hungarian concentration camp.[5]According to the official figures, it held in total 45,791 people between 27 December 1915 and 5 July 1917, of which:
16,673 men from Bosnia and Herzegovina,
16,996 women and children from Bosnia and Herzegovina (mostly of Serb ethnicity),
9,172 soldiers and civilians (men, women, children) from the Kingdom of Serbia,
2,950 soldiers and civilians from the Kingdom of Montenegro.
Some 12,000 people had died in this camp, largely due to malnutrition and poor sanitary conditions.
By February 1916, the authorities began redirecting the prisoners to other camps. The Serbs from Bosnia were mostly sent to Győr (Sopronyek, Šopronjek/Шопроњек).[6]
Most of the prisoners from Bosnia were entire families from the border regions of eastern Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is said that 5,000 families alone were uprooted from the Sarajevo district in eastern Bosnia along the border with the Kingdoms of Serbia & Montenegro.
Sorry Steph but Your princess belongs in another castle
I love your obscure histories. The stuff like “what was Peru like in WW2” etc and now this. Great narration, great story. I’m aware of the history your cover, but it doesn’t stop me from wanting to watch your uploads. Keep it up, most excellent! All the very best 👌
Thanks for watching and taking the time to reply 👍
@@HistoryHustle thank you sir
Thanks from Bosnia. Nice to see you visited us. I hope you had great time in Sarajevo and wherever else you've been.
👍👍👍
Jesi mu objasnio da je iz Sarajeva proterano i ubijeno 153000 Srba koliko je zivelo pre rata ni jedan nije ostao ni jedan
Thanks, very complicated mixture of politics, nationalism, and international affairs. Great video.
Thanks for watching!
Impressive amount of pictures/videos of the period for such a short video!
Fantastic video. I’m off to Bosnia next Saturday. Can’t wait.
Ditto
Welcome...!
Enjoy your trip!
The Great War and the Balkans, row of my favourite topics. You had some nice images in the video that I have not seen before, great work ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Thanks for your ongoing support!
@@HistoryHustle one of my very good friends just emigrated to The Netherlands. I am sure she mentioned they are living near Utrecht. 2 children at school, I would be thrilled if they somehow ended up with you as a teacher😇
Stefan is just the governor when it comes to giving you the lowdown on historical angles from the twentieth century that others never do.
Thank you for the best history channel on UA-cam 👏
Many thanks 😎
As soon as the Brits start drawing borders on a map you know there is going to be trouble ( the secret Treaty of London 1915).
The British also are behind the Banovina subdivisions of Yugoslavia after the dictatorship of the 6th of January
I see.
Interesting and fascinating Stefan thank you Amigo ✌🏻 have a spectacular week ahead !!! Cheers!!🍻
Many thanks, have a good week!
Again a very instructive video! Thank you Stefan!
Great to read.
Really fascinating stuff.
👍
Great short video. Impressive photos from that era. Keep it thank you!!
Thanks for your reply!
I just love your segmented talks about these complex pieces of history! It really helps to break things up into smaller pieces to understand it better. I look forward to your next video as always Professor Stefan!
Many thanks as always!!
Kinda funny how a ton of muslim bosniacs left their country for Turkey after WW1 to escape anti-muslim persecutions only to become fully secularized after Ataturk took over the Anatolian remnants of the Ottoman Empire and abolished the caliphate.
Belgrad white city (1000 white minaret of mosques was a Muslim city! All are now in Istanbul.
Fanatasic work. Great thanks.
Thanks for your response.
Another great video, thank you very much for making it. As an intersting fact regarding Bosnian soldiers fighting in WW1 on Italian front. The first mosque in Slovenian territory was built in 1916 near the village of Log pod Mangrtom in NW of nowadays Slovenia. The mosque was built by Bosnian Muslim soldiers of AH army fighting on the Soča (Isonzo) front. Close to the mosque was military cemetery. Italian authorities which annexed this area demolished the mosque in 1920s. The only remaining artefact of this mosque are some photographs preserved by the locals.
Thanks for sharing!
Bosanski vojnici nisu postojali nacija Bosnjak nastala 1993 godine upoznajte istoriju malo bolje sve ovo je povrsno
@@BLAGOJEVIC-m3n It wasn't you Mongols who built that mosque, sadly. And no, Bosniaks aren't Mongols like you.
If you can read german and ever come to Norrland (Sweden) i have a great book for you on this subject. Great stuff man and btw i lived in Beverwijk haha. Keep doing a good job.
👍
Always, ALWAYS, jump on your posts. Thanks again.
Awesome to read!
Thanks for another super interisting history lesson. It is hard to get hustory facts from this region. Greetings from Slovenia
Many thanks for your reply.
Wow, the algorithm blessed me today. I will be watching all of your videos sir.
Great to read 😁
I hope you will do episodes on Iran or Ethiopia.
See my Iran videos of a couple of years ago.
According to Austrians as it is written in their biblotheque Bosnia consists of Serbs with three religions
The Austrians had the Statuta Valachorum (Vlach Statues) from 1630 AD these Orthodox settlers from the East coming into Croatia from Bosnia were Vlach Orthodox from Wallachia now in Romania and not from Serbia.
No it doesn't. That has never been written anywhere. It is just another one of the vast plethora of serbian lies.
@@damirblazevic4823ujkane lako ukucaj "map of Europe 814" Sve mape su strane, lepo se vidi da Srbi naseljavaju celu Bosnu i većinu Dalmacije do Splita, nadalje i sam Einhard, istoričar i biograf Karla Velikog je napisao da Sorabi/Srbi naseljavaju većinu bivše Rimske provincije Dalmacije, ujkane niko i ne spominje, čak se Ljudevit Posavski spominje kao Slavenski knez a ne Hrvat, a i u vašoj "povijesti" piše da je Ljudevit Posavski 821 pobegao iz Siska, bežeći od Franaka, preko reke Vrbas kod Srba u zaštitu
According to Serbians as it is written in Načertanije Bosnia consists of Bosniaks with three religions
Dude thats lie 100%. Fck serbian mitoman lies. Serbs are turkish soldiers. Bosnia is Croatian Kingdom and some ortodox christians escape ottoman lands and later in late 19st they "become " serbs"
i love your videos keep it up
👍
Good episode. How about covering the small Italian states - like Parma - during the unification period.
Not anytime soon.
Interesting 👌 Very complicated area indeed.
😁👍
Thank you!
👍
"Big picture" without much detail for the uninitiated!! One people lived in Bosnia for thousands of years (most Bosnians are Slavized Illyrians)! The Romans broke their teeth many times until they conquered Bosnia! Many centuries later, Bosnians were members of the specific "Church of Bosnia" for centuries! As well as Bosnian rulers, kings! A small part were Catholics and Orthodox, but the same people, genetically, certainly! Many centuries later, the Turkish Empire conquered the Balkans, it's a very long story (Bosnian king Tvrtko sent his twenty thousand warriors to battle in Kosovo and the best military leader Vlatko Vukovic) to help the Serbs because then it was a "Christian coalition"! BUT Serbian leaders made a deal with the Turks even before the battle to have positions in the future Turkish empire on their territory! Only the Bosnians fought bravely there! After the Turks conquered Bosnia, in the following decades more than half of the population converted to Islam? Why? Nobody forced them, it was voluntary! That's why under the Turkish occupier, if you're a Muslim, you were in a way equal and a Turk couldn't take your sister or daughter like a non-Muslim! And with that act, they took the majority of Bosnians under their wing, covered both Orthodox and Catholics! Centuries have passed and Islam is deeply rooted in Bosnia! However, Bosnians often raised revolts, which were often suppressed by the Turks together with the Serbs! In the 19th century, with the strengthening of Serbia and the weak Turkish empire, Bosnian Orthodox converted to Serbs and Bosnian Catholics converted to Croats! A well-known Serbian nationalist wrote that Catholic Bosniaks, Mohammedan Bosniaks and Bosnians of our Orthodox faith live in Bosnia.@@HistoryHustle
Thanks. Great piece on what is still a thorny issue. BZ
Thanks for watching!
You could've mentioned that Bosnian regiments were elite force of KuK army, most decorated unit of KuK army was Bosnian, they were praised by their Austrian superiors so much that there's march song dedicated to them named "Die Bosniaken kommen" which is played on special occasions by today's Austrian army...
Other than that pretty nice video, hope you liked it here :)
Many thanks for your reply. Had a great time in the country!
My grandfather was with the Bosnians in Galicia. Before the assault on the Russian trenches, everyone was served with rum. Once there was no rum and it was necessary to attack. The Bosnians refused and started chanting "Nema ruma nema šturma" translated as ''no rum no assault''.
still amazing vidio, but focus more on stories, rather than when and which number a battalion was created...
Ok👍
thanks bro this clear things
Thanks for your reply.
Fantastic historical coverage work about Bosnia 🇧🇦 Herzegovina region during WW1..thank you an amazing ( history Hustle) channel. Introduced by 🙏Sir Stefan
Many thanks as always!!
One would think we would have learned that there's nothing Great about war.. The vid is Great again anyway 👍
Greets from Grun' 🇳🇱, TW.
🥉rd reply. Thanks as always T! Have a good weekend.
@@HistoryHustle : You too Stefan !
well, like "fantastic" and "awesome" the meaning of words has changed in modern times.. people back then didn't think WW1 was "great" in present day parlance.
@@coling3957 : Great! ;-) Thanks 👍
"History can say what it want but rarely does it remember anything correctly"-Lawkeeper Equity Mlp Ace Attorney EOJ
Who the heck is lawkeeper ace attorney EOJ
WHO??
I wonder that too..
Ace Attorney and mlp audio drama@@HistoryHustle
Very good and accurate video with a couple of mistakes. Firstly, Internment camps for Serb civilians were actually the first concentration camps in Europe. There were 8 camps all around the A-H empire. Doboj, Mauthauen, Arad, Frauenkirchen, to name a few. More than 200.000 children, women, elderly were killed. Secondly, Bosniaks haven’t existed at the time, only Serbs and Croats, of which there were 2 religions Christians: (Catholics and Orthodox) and Muslims. Communists will make up a new nation in 1971 - Muslim, who will became Bosniaks in 1990s. Even though I’m not from the region, I did my master in WW1 covering the Balkans.
Always interesting Stefan. Cheers from Tennessee
👍👍👍
Very instructive, but something needs to be added for complete truth. During the Austro-Hungarian rule, Serbs were the most numerous population in Bosnia. Until 1971, Serbs were the majority in Sarajevo, so at the time of the assassination, Serbs were certainly the majority in Sarajevo. The arrival of the heir to the throne in Bosnia and Sarajevo was actually a provocation for the Serbs. During the first and especially the second world war, our neighbors Bosniaks and Croats did everything to help the occupiers in exterminating the Serbs. When you add to that the fact that today's Bosniaks are actually a Slavic population that converted to Islam after the Ottoman occupation and actually became collaborators of the occupiers who have been harassing local Christians for the past 400 years, it is a miracle that there are any Serbs in Bosnia today.

🤣🤣🤣🤣 Serbian mythomania as usual
As usual, your mantras about our mythomania. Although, a mythomaniac can only be one who has myths, because myths are something that greatly influences the formation of a nation, legends as well. If you had them, you probably would have created them much earlier and not in the early nineties. Just to add, I just transferred the data from the official census in Bosnia in 1910, which was carried out by Austria-Hungary. So from their archives. I also transferred data from the official census in Bosnia and Herzegovina from 1961 related to Sarajevo. Who really wants can easily check. I also mentioned the 400 years of Ottoman rule and your subjugation, did I make a mistake there? That it is not a myth.

Before the Ottoman Turks invaded Bosnia in 1463 AD there were no muslims or Serbs in Bosnia.
The population of the district of Sarajevo, according to the 1921 Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes religious population census:
Serbian Orthodox Christians 55,477 (38.6%)
Sunni Muslims 50,270 (34.9%)
Roman Catholic Christians 29,395 (20.4%)
Others 8,768 (6.1%)
I hope it is common knowledge that modern nations did not emerge until the 19th century. Certainly there were no nationally determined people in Bosnia at that time either. Nor the Croats, since I see that you did not mention them. At that time, the ancestors of today's Serbs, Croats and Bosniaks lived there.

2:02 The black hand was funded by the serbian military, trained by the serbian military, and the leader of Black hand was a high ranking serbian officer.
Source?
@@HistoryHustle Wiki page of Dragutin Dimitrijević, the highest ranking Serbian military intelligence officer, and leader of the Black Hand. Dragutin Dimitrijević was also was responsible for the Serbian may coup which was a military coup that killed King Alexandrea and installed King peter, who he had ties to, so the Black hand had a lot of political power when it was founded a few years later.
Interesting how today Croats are fully aligned with west (back then you could call Habsburgs the west), Bosniaks still want to be the part of that west and Serbs are still anti-west even after more then 100 years later. Bosnia as a result, still in no mans land 😢
Have you ever been in Bosnia?
@@HistoryHustle yes I did. Living there for the last 28 years 😅. Why?
No mans land sounds kinda rough don't you think?
@@HistoryHustle Well, knowing what my country could become if all of it's people actually worked together instead of what we have now I don't think it's rough at all.
Right now we have a country where serbs are not even hiding that they are trying to secede and join Serbia. Croats that love Croatia more then their own land and are actively sabotaging anything positive in Bosnia just in case it doesn't get good as Croatia is. And bosniaks whose politicans are so deep in mud called corruption that occupies them alot more then actually fighting for the country.
Like I said, I'm 28 and living here my whole life, half of my friends have moved to western europe or usa due to lack of normal standards here in Bosnia, and that's bad healthcare, political instability, low salaries, corruption, lack of security, constant threat of new war etc etc...
My friends are gone and I don't blame them, you don't even have to live here to realize why this country is a no mans lans - just read daily news from Bosnia and it will be enough to understand.. Unfortunately
Ah yes serbs , They were so 'west' hating back then that they were the only one that had fully recognized state by the 'west' with the modern military resembling Frensh, but sure MUSLIMS were 'pro-western' back then, if it was up to them they would have restablished ottoman rule back along side the sharia law
I travelled across and all the way down Yugoslavia when it was called such in 1977.
Must have been an interesting trip.
I did similar in 1986 I hitch hiked from Belgrade to Zagreb then I was in Brac for a week had a great time, also back in Zagreb in 1991 just before war broke out when two policemen were shot on the Plitvic lakes, we were told by local people trouble was coming...Yugoslavia was beautiful and friendly, so sad what happened
Even after 110 years, everything is the same...Bosnia is not a country, the Bonian Serbs are for Serbia, the Bosnian Croats are for Croatia, and the Bosniaks don't even know what they would do...and who they would do with. They don't know themselves. If Bosnia could be a country, it would Austrians did.
The first sentence of your reply is the biggest over-simplification I have ever read and breathes so much frustration.
@@HistoryHustle My comment are facts that can be easily verified, I don't live in Bosnia nor am I interested in Bosnia, but I follow the situation in the Balkans. In that quasi-state, there is a big division into Republika Srpska, where Serbs are the majority, and the Federation, where Muslims live...Serbs they threaten to join Serbia. Frustration is in the eye of the beholder..
@@1970valtari Its called a clash of civilisations.
Gospodo BOSNA I HERCEGOVIMA je drzava i bice drzava s srbima ili bez njih.Tacnije bosanski vlasi
An interesting thing no one mentions that Gavrilo's father worked as an Austrian police officer
Interesting.
It may be interesting, but it isn't true.
Lol.
Gavrilo father Petar Princip was villager and post office worker born 1860,,he was involved in uprising aggains Ottomans in 1875-1877 in Bosnia .After uprising he return to his village .He died 26.1.1940
Another"great " military " history"lesson " for "myself"...." Instructor "!!
👍👍👍
Wrong and missing info ,when ww1 was initiated in Sarajevo,there were also Turkish population living there
So what is wrong?
You dont say Turkish also living in Bosnia at that time st the beginning of the video
How many? If it was a handful it is not relevant.
Great video, thanks. Ironic that Serbian domination of the South Slavs was worse than Turkish or Austrian rule.
What made it worse?
You don’t know anything about South Slavic peoples.You must be Ustash or radical Muslim.Serbs were majority in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Dalmatia,Slavonia..Nearly 500 years Turkish had destroying Slavic land.Lot os people were forced to convert ti Islam.Muslim from Bosnia and Herzegovina together with Croatian never uprising against Austr Hungary and Turkey.Serbs liberated them twice with high prices of a 75% ofSerbs male population were kild iWWI😢😢😢
Lmaoooooooo
@@HistoryHustleIdea/ program of a Great Serbia....and in present time, known as "Srpski svet"-Serbian world.
@@HistoryHustle Everything.
Young Bosnia was not Serbian nationalist organisation because it had a lot of Muslim and Croat members but today even among Serbs people believe that Young Bosnia was a Serbian nationalist organisation
I see.
A jel ba
@@baguettedestroyer4145 Jes Ba bogami bilo je I vasih sa Gavrilom
They were a Serb organisation that went to Belgrade in Serbia to pick up the weapons from the Serbian secret agent "Apis" (Dragutin Dimitrijević).
@@rankoorovic7904 aaaahahahahahahahaahahhahahahahahahahahahahahagahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaha 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The beautifull buildings all from austria
Habsburg FM Berchtold felt he'd been humiliated by Serbian successes in the Balkan wars and sharp political criticism that he'd failed to contain Serbian expansion, so he wanted to appear tough in 1914. Emotions are always in there somewhere.
You spelled KOROŠEC wrong it is spelling KOROSCEC
I see.
AFAK the judge who sentenced Princip to prison term died as Jew in the same prison during Hitler's regime.
Really? Didn't know this.
@@HistoryHustle Not 100 percent sure, but I read it somewhere, probably others have more info.
Does anyone know if or where information of what may have happened to Gavrilo Princip family or village that would have caused his determination to become a terrorist? Like did something happen to his relations; or stories of horror that might have galvanised him into action? Or was he just a lone wolf looking for purpose?
Love to know too. Anyone?
@@HistoryHustle Without doing the research; I don't believe Serbia was ever occupied by the Austrian, Hungarian Empire; nor launched raids/pogroms against the Serbs. I would have thought being Orthodox Christian they would have more in common with the former compared to the Turks. Maybe the Habsburgs funded nationalist (?) groups to cleanse Serbs from territory?
Gavrilo Princip was brought up on Serbian myths and stories about the Battle of Kosovo of 1389 AD. Princip also was a T.B sufferer who main goal was to go out in a blaze of glory, as he saw it.
In prison he was horrified at the outcome of his actions especially for Serbia.
Bosnia actually was never a part of the medieval Serbian Kingdom which made the whole thing hard to understand unless you read about Serbia's "Greater Serbia" plans.
@@TheSouth-j7f According to Wiki; apparently he regretted nothing. It is said that he believed in a united Serbia for all Slavs. This included Croatia, Slovenia; to have all Slavic people free from Austria. Were these the views of a fantasist? Like how the Czechs and Slovaks were once united but are "different" enough to split once the opportunity arose. Left-wing anarchist or Nationalist patriot? I can understand why a people would want to free themselves from Imperial rule; but was that rule violent enough to galvanise a person to conduct an assassination attempt that would surely cost him his life? And why wouldn't Serbia hand him to the Austrians even if it was against their constitution? Better him (a criminal) then a full scale war!
@@Adam-zq2mw Princip was not in Serbia. He was caught in Sarajevo immediately after the assassination. Austria demanded that Austrian officials conduct an investigation on the territory of Serbia. That was a direct violation of Serbia's sovereignty and she could not accept it.
My bosnian great great grandpa fought against russians first, then ,i assume, after capitulation of russia he was sent to solun. He survived till 1970-s, almost 90 years and i visit his grave in tuzla
He lived a long life. May he rest in peace.
incredible to think that the Archduke and his wife were killed because their car had no REVERSE gear... the time taken to turn the car around when it took the wrong turn was enough for the assassin.. the Balkans was a hot spot for a long time following the Ottomans being booted out and new nations squabbling over borders. the hot mess that was Yugoslavia created after WW2 did not help matters either.. Another great video covering aspects most of us know little about.. :)
Many thanks as always for watching and replying 👍
9:30 Hi, Stefan! You said “anarchy reinged on the contryside”… I think what you meant by "anarchy" is chaos and violence. Ok… But you must be aware that anarchy for the ancaps is something like free-market (or black market), free association / dissociation, and non-agression. 🕊
Libertarian cheers, and obrigado! ヽ(͡◕ ͜ʖ ͡◕)ﾉ 🍀 🇧🇷
Ah yes, I understand. Whenever it is stated that there was anarchy it means chaos. When there was anarchism that's sonething else. Cheers from Recife 🇧🇷
Now we have another loop where history repeats itself and it is highly expected that Bosnia once more will break with the Republika Srpska is ready to get its independance and unite with Serbia. To be honest with you i do not expect it to be like the separation of Czechoslovakia.
It's not true that only Muslims wire the red fez. ALL OF THEM WORE THE RED FEZ. The guy at 3:53 is a Orthodox Serb and wears the red Fez. I'm seeing you still have a bit of a problem with understanding the dynamics in the Balkans. I can help you if you want. I'm a bit of a specialist on the matter.
Which books have you read on the topic? My sources are in the video description.
The term "bosniaks" didn't exist until 1992.
I see.
It did exist before 1992 but it was a Croat community in Hungary (in Hungarian: Bosnyákok) who escaped Bosnia hundreds of years ago to get away from the Ottoman Turks and who settled in Hungary.
The Bosniak muslims are a different group of people (a mix of converted Croats, Serbs and Turks etc) but who have sadly usurped this Croat communities old name.
The muslims were only recognised as an ethnic group in 1968 by the Yugoslav communist party.
The "muslims" later changed their name to "Bosnian muslims" and then changed their name again this time to "Bosniak" (muslims) in the last few decades.
@@TheSouth-j7f Not true, search up what nacertanije say and the newspaper Bosnjak, Bosniaks lived in Hum, Vrbas, Una, Drina, etc Bosniaks are not Croats nor Serbs..
@@AmarEcd1233brother, the history doesn't lie. Mehmed Pasha Sokollu = Sokolovic. Omer Pasha Latas = Mihajlo Latas. Whether converted whether by force, coercion or persuasion, all have Serbian origin.
This video is 100% accurate
👍
1:35 Austro-Hungary didn't have documents to prove that Serbia was behind the assassination. However, it was hard to believe that Serbia had nothing to do with it. This is why Austro-Hungary asked to examine the documents on Serbian soil. Tihomir Rajčić, in his new book BEOGRADSKE TAJNE I. SVJETSKOG RATA (2023), discusses this issue. Recently, Serbia published 40 books containing documentation from the First World War and earlier. We can now say that Serbia was behind the assassination. Nikola Pašić, through Vojislav Tankosić and the Black Hand, organized this assassination. Serbia financed and organized state terrorism in Bosnia and Herzegovina. For example, four days before the assassination, Nikola Pašić wrote to the Serbian Ministry of Defense, stating that all their allies, when they found out what their officers and subofficers were doing in Bosnia, would expel Serbia from the community and leave Austro-Hungary to deal with Serbia as they wished.
What was Serbia's goal with the assassination?
@@HistoryHustle Serbia has had the same goal for a long time. Great Serbia, read about Načertanije.
@@HistoryHustle serbia was Britain puppet, it was Britain intelligence who is behind assassination. and was Britain goal to do that.
@@HistoryHustle Archduke Franz Ferdinand had the idea to reshape Austro-Hungary (trialism). Croatia would have an area of the state Država Slovenaca, Hrvata i Srba that was created at 29.10.1918.
Serbia from the 19th century had geostrategic ideology (Ilija Garašanin), linguistic ideology (Vuk Karadžić), cultural mainstream (newspapers, books, educational system) ect. to set free Serbian Orthodox people in Bosnia and Herzegovina from the Austro-Hungary in the form of territorial enlargement of Serbia. In their propaganda this was also valid to all South Slavic people, Croats, and Bosnian muslims, they were Serbs in their propaganda. So all Serbian culture opposed the idea of trialism and was ready to die against this idea.
Secret organizations (eq. Crna ruka) puted this goal ahead of the interests of Serbia as a state. They have controlled the Serbian state to a large extent. Even before they have killed Serbian rulers if they would not go along with their goals.
Calculation was that Russia will probably back them up in a potential war with Austro-Hungary. In the end they rejected the Austro-Hungarian Ultimatum and the war was about to begin.
Creation of Yugoslavia in 1918 was the realisation of the Serbian goal from the 19th century to a large extent.
You can read about Serbian culture in this regard in the short book published in English: Branimir Anzulović Heavenly Serbia: From Myth to Genocide, New York University Press, New York, 1999. Keywords: Ilija Garašanin and Vuk Karadžić.
Feel free to contact Croatian historian who has written a book about Serbian responsibility for the First World War, Tihomir Rajčić, rajcic66@yahoo.com.
Just don't lie. The largest concentration of revolutionaries was right there where all of the action was taking place, where all of you "southern Slavs" were languishing under Hapsburg domination. Croat revolutionaries were very vocal in their own right, but as an institution the pre-war Kingdom of Serbia had a very prominent national state orientation, did not have much regard for you all outside of her own natural sovereign borders and was still less interested in any of your big wind secondary, European imported ideologies, like anarchism and socialism. Or Vatican sponsored messianism, for that matter. Austrians were just looking for an excuse to expand in to the Balkans for geopolitical expediency, because they were a fast decaying empire with massive internal instability, and who feared losing lands bordering with Russia if they didn't "act in time", hence why they forcefully annexed Bosnia in 1908. For them it was the springboard from where they intended to launch further military expansion across the Drina river and along the Danube. There simply isn't one good reason to prove why pre-war Serbia would have seeked to provoke a war with the Austrians, at all.
You are wrong by calling Bosnian Muslims in this time "Bosniaks". That simply didnt exist. In that time Bosniaks/Bosnians were: Serbs (majority, ortodox), PoTurice (converted to Turks, muslims) and Croats (catholics). Only in 1992. Muslims, PoTurice monopolized name of Bosnia by theft only for them.
Irrelevant. I use the word to describe Bosnian Muslims.
Serbs and Croats did not exist in Bosnia before 1918 y and after 1918 Bosnyaks orthodox started to call themselves Sebes and Bosnyaks Catholics started to call themselves Croats since churches/priests came from Serbia and Croatia had too much of influence on our peasants !
@@avdohodzic775 What is dna genetic prove for your claims that we Bosniak Serbs are different from others Serbs? Lies, we are similar dna, same nation!
@@HistoryHustle Its relevant because who dont know situation would wrongly think that Croats came from Croatia, that Serbs came from Serbia and that only Bosniak Muslims are natives in Bosnia. Its not true, Serbs and Croats are natives to Bosnia, not invaders from other regions
These are Bosnian Croats, Bosnian Serbs, etc. And someone else gave me crap about saying Bosnian muslims. The Balkans remains a heavily polarized region which manifests itself in comment sections.
no WW1- no Croatian state, no Slovenian state, no Slovakian state, no Czhechia state and no Rumania in it's current borders.
WW1 brought about the destruction of empires and that was the most profound progress of humanity!
oh and what quasi historians continually forget to consider is- what if one of the previous attempts by a Muslim or a Croat had succeeded?
What if...
@HistoryHustle meaning, how would you blame Serbia if a Croat and a Muslim succeeded in killing the megalomenical turd!?
but I guess the most murderess "people" Germans would have come up with something
@HistoryHustle meaning, how would you blame Serbia if a Croat or a Muslim succeeded in killing the megalomaniac?
No idea what your point is.
@HistoryHustle my point is the most genocidal nation in the history of humanity (Germans) - 6 + million Jews, 20+ million Russians and God knows how many Poles and Czekoslovakians - didn't need a fucking reason to start a war! just a fucking excuse and not to mention the death of one third of my people at the hands of the most evil nation in history (!) .if any race had a reason to die of shame it is the Germans! and if any nation had a reason to shut the fuck it is the Germans! Austria and deuchhfuckindland
CONSPIRACY THEORY: Archduke's car licence plate "AIII 118", which some have read as the date the eventual Armistice was signed. Pulling the digits apart differently can be interpreted as 11 11 18. The Armistice was signed on 11 November 1918.
Read something like that once.
@@HistoryHustle yes his car is still in the museum with that licence plate which is also the date the war would end....there are pictures of it you can see online..what are the chances...
Visited both the Vienna museum and the spot in Sarajevo.
Hungary was stopped by Bosnia from expanding to the Sea a millenia ago. They were literally crapped on and embarrassed by Bosnians, making the ultimate difference where Hungary is now a tiny landlocked state instead of a large empire.
Haha misliš Srbi. Vi niste ni postojali kao narod
Don't you think that the Trianon Treaty made Hungary as small as it is today.
@@HistoryHustle There were other factors but it was still Bosnia that stopped Hungary from expanding back than. Today they support Serb separatism while disrespecting Bosnia's sovereignty and territorial integrity.
@@tarik6990 The Kingdom of Croatia including Bosnia joined Hungary in an union in 1102 AD.
If you look at a regional map its Croatia (Slavonia) then Bosnia ,then Herzegovina then the Croatian coastline (Dalmatia) again.
So are you talking about the muslim Turkish point of view ?
@@TheSouth-j7f Ok and? It doesn't change the fact that Bosnjani back than sent Hungarians packing.
How is Serbia's involvement debatable? Gavrilo Princip was a junior member of a larger group co-ordinated by the Black hand which in turn was funded by the Russia Tsarist Ohrana ...
Even if that is true influence of the Serbian state is not the case.
In that time we was autrougarian colony and some mans islamic catolics and ortodox send to die for germans aginst Brothers nations slovanian nations. Sad and hard history
Not sure if it really was a colony, which means it was soley occupied for economic means. But in a way you can call it is such. Sad history indeed.
@@HistoryHustle Yeah sems as colony
Bosnians Bogumil who converted to orthodoxy were given a name serb vlah...Bosnian who converted to Christianity influence of Pope are called Croats..Bosnian who stayed Bogumil but later converted to Islam are Bosniaks.
Thanks for sharing.
I was wondering but can you do a video on Albania and Greece in the First World War and I am asking because Albania is an interesting country in the First World War because its ruler at the time of ww1 was a German but Albania also had an important role/ part to play in ww1 and this role/ part was that after the central powers overran Serbia the Serbian army had to retreat through Albania and then the central powers took over it however the Serbs would return to Albania as the Serbians and the allies established a stable line however Greece also played an important role in ww1 as without Greece the allies would have not been able to land in Thessaloniki and they wouldn’t have launched the vardar offensive.
Albania in WW1 not anytime soon.
Greece in WW1 right here:
ua-cam.com/video/WlM47PYn7V4/v-deo.htmlsi=nVOmM2G8Y4sX34Ol
@@HistoryHustle oh okay.
hahahah i danas su poltroni njemacke ,nisu se nista promjenuli ni naucili ni za 1 sv.rat a ni za 2 svjetski rat opet su izgubili rat sa svabama skupa
No idea what you are trying to say.
& HERZEGOVINA
BOSNA
most people barely know about Bosnia.. let alone another "Ruritania" :P
True, I want to title to be consise.
Hercegovina from german title herzog
@@baguettedestroyer4145 That is correct Herzegovina gets its name from the German word "Herzog" meaning a Duke. So Herzegovina means land of the Duke.
While Bosnia gets its name from the Bosna river.
Nobody says that Serbian secret service organized agents, to unite Serbs out of Serbia and organized young guys to kill Austrian duke that was supposed to be next ruller. The idea was to take Bosnia, Monte Negro, Macedonia, etc. They caused WW1, and WW2 followed. If you ask Serbian historians, they are innocent but brave victims.
The Austrian-Hungarian-Croat empire would have been great.
Why quite Croat beside Czechs Slovaks Slovenians Boanians..?
@@nashbridges-cu6dy Probably because Croats had their own parliament or assembly for centuries (the Croatian Sabor) within the Austrian Empire ( and before that within the Kingdom of Hungary).
@@TheSouth-j7f really? But then why Croats made State of Slovenians Croats and Serbs then, why its not just Croatia? And why didn't the World recognize state of shs?
@@nashbridges-cu6dy60% of politics who where for that conutry were masonic lodge supported with great masonic lodges in Paris and London. It was there projects. Serbs are know for masonic becuase they started first word war for interest of London geopolitics.
Croatians are Catholic's and Church forbids masonic work!
@@oktavijanaugust2111 Do catholics forbids genocides too?
Big picture!! Bosnians as one people live for thousands of years in Bosnia (Bosnians are Slavized Illyrians)! Many centuries later, Bosnians were members of the "Bosnian Church", as were Bosnian kings!Many centuries later, the Turkish empire conquers the Balkans! The Bosnian king Tvrtko sent his twenty thousand warriors to fight in Kosovo and the best military leader Vlatko Vuković, because at that time it was a "Christian coalition"! BUT the Serbian leaders agreed with the Turks to have positions in the future Turkish empire! After the Turks conquered Bosnia, more than half of the population of Bosnia converted to Islam? Why? No one forced them, it was voluntary! Because under the Turkish occupier, if you are a Muslim, you were somehow equal and a Turk could not take your sister or daughter as a non-Muslim! By that act, by converting to Islam, the Bosnian Muslims placed the majority of Bosnian Orthodox and Bosnian Catholics under their protection. ! Centuries have passed and Islam is deeply rooted in Bosnia! However, Bosnians often raised revolts, which were often suppressed by the Turks together with the Serbs! In the 19th century, with the strengthening of Serbia and the weakening of the Turkish Empire, the Bosnian Orthodox became Serbs, and the Bosnian Catholic became Croats! The well-known Serbian nationalist Ilija Garasanin wrote in his Book Nacertanije that Bosniaks Catholics,Bosniaks Mohammedans and Bosniaks of our Orthodox faith live in Bosnia!! Yes, in certain periods, serfs from Serbia came to Bosnia (who today come to America as Mexicans) and yes, they left their roots, that is 5-6 percent of the people in Bosnia, the majority of Serbs in Bosnia today are the autochthonous Bosnian people as well as today's croatians i! Famous writers Ivo Andrić and Meša Selimović never mentioned Serbs or Croats in their novels, but Bosnians...and where necessary it was emphasized that they were Bosnian Christians!
By converting into Islam, they also didn't have to pay harac-tax.
@@60mijo Also ua-cam.com/video/Tj7ZSvTBlUo/v-deo.htmlsi=b-XKx4fgWSs5zwtV
Bosnia was part of the Roman Catholic world (Croatia) at the time of the religious Great Schism in 1054 AD.
The religious border was the river Drina which happened to be the old internal West/East Roman Empire border.
This was internationally agreed between Rome and Constantinople ( as the Serbian Orthodox church didn't exist then).
So much for your Dobrica Ćosić doctrine style history.
❤
👍
You have such a shollow grasp on Croatian / Bosnian history, i would even go as far as assuming you have Pro Serbian / Communist tenancies.
Do you use Wikipedia as your source for referencing?
Did you know prior to Ottoman expansion into Europe that Bosnia was majority Catholic.
After the Ottoman fall a vacuum was left allowing Serbian Orthodoxy and self delusion to move in? (including Mintenegrin and Macedonian interference)
7:30 The Hapsbergs (Austria) were in serious consideration of sharing a Triune crown with Croatia and Hungry, but Hungary was vehemently opposed to this idea.
Immediatelly after WW1, Croatian entered into a (little known) union called the "STATE of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs" which was different to the "KINGDOM of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes" (Jugoslavia 1)
But i guess you're best at teaching UA-cam and High School students and that real facts dont matter to you or your deciples.
I think it best if you leave this region of the world to the real historians who are willing to give an unbiased assesment with impecable referencing that are able to delve well beyond 100 years of history.
But i guess you wont as you have a set agenda for this region.
Btw, please stop referencing Slovenia and Croatian as "Balkan", our long standing and rich histories are nowhere close to "Balkan" except for the Serbianisation of the last 100 years.
By asking this question you have shown you didn't watch the video as my sources are in it, as well as below.
@RobFiles - Leave the author alone. Everything is well said, only you are unable to accept the truth.
Bosnia had its own church the Bosnian church not a Catholic church
Wait a sec, what is a state of slovenians croats and serbs? Does it include nowdays country of Serbia or not?
@@nashbridges-cu6dy The State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs was a political entity that was constituted in October 1918 they joined the Kingdom of Serbia to form the new state of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes ( later renamed to Yugoslavia in 1929).
✌
👍
Austria-Hungary occupied Serbian land (Bosnia) and incidents and intolerance were to be expected. I don't why the Germans cannot understand that the Serbian people will never suffer their imperialism and colonialism with assimilation and crimes. The worst were the paramilitary formations composed mainly of Bosnian Muslims called Šuckors who killed Serbian civilians.
"Serbijan land" 😂😂😂😂😂
@@enesbabunovic2401 Before the Turkish conquests, only the Serbian people existed in Bosnia, after we have Bosnian Muslims.
@@AMEurope333"LAŽ je najveće dostignuće srbinovo" Dobrica Ćosić
Bosnians and Albanians came into being as shock troops for the Ottomans, Europeans who converted for special treatment in the Caliphate. after Ottomans sent packing, these groups became problematic in the Balkans
@coling3957 I think you need to do a little more, no make that A LOT more reading about BiH and Albanian history my friend and stop listening to this History Hustle / Pro-Serbian supporter.
Don't you realise he has hustle in his title for a reason.
For the 20th time: Stop naming the Bosniaks by their religion while naming the others by their ethnicity! Not all Bosniaks are muslims. Only people that use that name these days are Serbian and Croatian revisionist and seccesionist politicians.
Just stop it!
It's not that hard!!!!
Relax dude. How should I call them?
Paul I Šubić of Bribir (Croatian: Pavao I. Šubić Bribirski, Hungarian: bribiri I. Subics Pál; c. 1245 - 1 May 1312) was Ban of Croatia between 1275 and 1312, and Lord of Bosnia from 1299 AD.
After Paul dies his son Mladen took over.
Mladen II Šubić of Bribir (Croatian: Mladen II Šubić Bribirski, Hungarian: bribiri Subics Mladen; c.1270 - c.1341), a Croatian leader and member of the Šubić noble family, was a Ban of Croatia and Lord of all of Bosnia from 1312 AD.
So, Croats have been in Bosnia a long time, since the 7th century.
The current Bosniaks usurped the Bosniak name from the Christian Bosniaks who were ethnic Croats who fled Bosnia hundreds of years ago to get away from the Ottoman Turks. These Croats from Bosnia settled in Hungary were they still call themselves Bosniaks (Croats) to this day.
The Bosniak muslims are a different case. The muslims were first recognised as an ethnic group in 1968 by the Yugoslav communist party. They later changed their named to "Bosnian muslims" and then changed their name again in the last few decades to Bosniak (muslims).
You can see lilies on the shield/coat of arms in his profile picture. They have stolen it from the Serbs, specifically the Nemanjić dynasty. They have stolen everything from the Serbs, including the language. A bunch of wonnabes who is desperately trying to create a nation but are lacking everything.thx for everything u do ! Nice work!
@@HistoryHustle
You can see lilies on the shield/coat of arms in his profile picture. They have stolen it from the Serbs, specifically the Nemanjić dynasty. They have stolen everything from the Serbs, including the language. A bunch of wonnabes who is desperately trying to create a nation but are lacking everything.thx for your work, well done !
Serbia got statehood by help of Russia, Croatia became a state by help of America and NATO , Bosnia had many enemies, struggled but became a state and still have internal political problems since one part of Bosnyaks orthodox and Bosnyaks Catholics under influence of nationalists and churches from Serbia and Croatia still work to destroy Bosnia. Bosnyaks patriots want to form Bosnia as a stable, modern , democratic country Republic of Bosna and join EU and NATO !
First
Close 🥈
@@HistoryHustle Aww man
You are the best . Greetings from Serbia ❤💙🤍
Thanks for watching!
Excellent video, starting with the Turkish occupiers whom they faithfully served, fought and killed for them as janissaries. While only the Serbs in Bosnia raised revolts against the Turkish occupation. Well, through the new occupier of Austria, when the Muslims of course serve the occupier this time as Schutzkorps! Where the Serbs again only revolted against the occupation, so in WW2, as you guessed again, the faithful servants of the new occupiers, the clerical fascist Ustasha and the SS of the German Nazis... Is muslim ! And again, the Serbs revolted and the Muslims faithfully served the Nazis! In the war in Bosnia, the servants of the US NATO occupiers, just like today... So whoever occupied Bosnia, starting with the Turks, had faithful servants, in the Muslims from Bosnia. And of course all the occupiers are aware of that, who will serve them faithfully. Only for all the occupiers and their Muslim "Bosniak" servants... The target has never changed, it has always remained the same, it is always only the Serbs. From the Turks to the Austrians, Nazi Germany and the Ustasha, to the US and NATO today. They are always the occupiers in Bosnia they saw the Serbs as the only problem for them! And convert Islamists, Muslims as faithful servants, in the realization of hegemony and occupation! Very interesting historical facts!
All due respect but your reply is very one sided. I encourage you to watch my Bosnia WW2 episode.
@@HistoryHustle I watched your video about WW2 even before. Quite well done. Except for some mistakes in the form of quoting Yugoslav communist historiography, you said to your heart that it was the Yugoslav view in the form of the alleged "7 offensives"... Which is a pure fabrication, unfortunately generally accepted both in the east and in the west... Both with the Yugoslav Army (D. Mihailović's Chetniks) and with the partisan movement, there was a certain collaboration with the Germans during WW2. The only problem is that the partisan collaboration with the Germans and Ustashas was concealed after the war in the form of communist propaganda.
However, look at the March negotiations in 1943. There was also cooperation between the Partisan movement and the Germans near Višegrad. And that was to get behind the Chetniks, the Germans missed them... What Koča Popović, one of the Partisan generals during the war, described in his book. The same Koča Popović participated in the March 1943 negotiations with the Ustashas and the Germans... But I agree with you that those were the only two liberation movements. Everyone else was fascist!
Fascists were formed in Yugoslavia during WW2 along with of course the German occupier, the Italian occupier...Also the Ustashas who were Croats and Muslims. The so-called "Bosniaks" under that name, let me remind you, have existed only since 1993. Since they changed their name several times, call them "nations" and converted more times in history than they changed their socks.
As well as the Albanians who compose it as well
exclusively the fascist movements of SS Skanderbeu and Ballista ... Also, a part of the Muslims from Bosnia who were not in the Ustasha were also part of the SS troops, more precisely the SS Handjar division, and also the Muslims on the territory of Serbia in the Raška region were also part of the German Nazi occupation apparatus ... Muslims, Croats and Albanians mostly belonged to fascist formations during WW2. While in the anti-fascist movements, the Partisan Movement and the Yugoslav Army in the Motherland, they were at the level of statistical error.
Also, the same Ustasha formations and the SS Hanjar Division in the NDH committed genocide against the Serbian people first of all, but also the Jewish and Roma people. Which is a very well-known fact to you. Officially, they were killed in camps, pits, on doorsteps...
With a knife, a sledgehammer, a bayonet... In a monstrous way, at least 350,000 Serbs were killed. Jasenovac is one of about 30 camps. Including several camps for children, which even Hitler himself did not have! Gideon Greif wrote the book Jasenovac, the Balkan Auschwitz. Except that Auschwitz was a "children's playground" for Jasenovac. Because even the most hardened German and Italian fascists were appalled at the Ustasha crimes.
Things are very clear there, I don't know what is really not clear to you?!
A certain type of collaboration also exists among the Serbs, in the form of General Nedić's movement. But as you yourself said, it was in the German occupation zone, which included only a small part of today's Serbia, and the Germans were in charge. His formations do not participate in battles outside Serbia. Nor did Muslims commit crimes against Croats. There is also Dimitrije Ljotić with his Kvisling movement... Which also did not operate outside of Serbia and the German occupation zone... But unlike the Croats, Muslims, and Albanians, who 90% in fascist units.
Serbs joined Nedić's and Ljotić's movement at the level of a statistical error. Perhaps a total of up to 5% of the Serbian population was with Nedić's and Ljotić's movements. The rest were part of the Partisan movement, over 90% of the Partisan movement until the fall of Italy in 1943 were Serbs! And practically around 97-98% at Mihailović's.
The Muslims we are talking about made up about 2% of the partisan movement. And there were about 1% of them at Mihailovic.
These are facts that you can check very easily. So there is no one-sided, two-sided or three-sided view of history. There is only one history!
He also doesn't know. what is not clear to you about the actions of Muslims or today the so-called "Bosniak" during the Turkish occupation when they converted, as Turkish servants, to Islam, which was brought by the Turkish occupier to Bosnia and Serbia. And now they bear Turkish names, and profess the religion they received from the occupiers. As janissaries, ages and beys served the Turks faithfully for practically 500 years... They fought for the Turkish occupier, the target was practically exclusively, and the "Bosniak" as a puppet of the Turks, as well as the Turkish occupier, were exclusively Serbs! Who raised rebellions and fought as Hajduks ,committees and Chetniks and insurgents against the "Bosniaks" and their Turkish masters.
Serbia liberated itself from the Turks. Later, in the Balkan wars and after WW1, the Serbian army also liberated the present-day territories of Croatia, Bosnia and Slovenia, Macedonia... From the Austrian and earlier Turkish occupiers.
When the Turks left, Bosnia was annexed by the Austro-Hungarian occupier. And again the "Bosniaks" waged war as servants and killed Serbian civilians, at the expense of the new boss, this time not as janissaries but as Schutzkorps at the expense of the Austro-Hungarian occupier... Both before and during WW1.
So things are very clear, I don't see anything unclear. These are all historical facts that can be easily verified.
Herzegovina ❤🇭🇷
🇧🇦👍
@@HistoryHustle 🇧🇦❤️🇭🇷 one love
My man.. you dont know nothing abouth history and what really hapend.. my man
My man, he is not explaining anything and just venting anger, my man.