LUCY: Ending Explained!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @krishanubanerjee6955
    @krishanubanerjee6955 4 роки тому +668

    "We never really die!" - I realized how far the movie was going to delve into metaphysical territory the moment I heard that line. Awesome movie, by the way. Deserved way more attention than it did. Some viewers couldn't just get over the fact that it was based on a pseudo-scientific theory. Agreed - it did start there, but it went somewhere very few films have ever dared!

    • @itzelmayoral729
      @itzelmayoral729 4 роки тому +6

      Agreed!!!!!!!!!

    • @billyjoechambers8494
      @billyjoechambers8494 4 роки тому +15

      ' We never really die,' then next scene is shown the tunnel in Paris where Princess Diana died.

    • @TheManBlaka
      @TheManBlaka 4 роки тому +2

      Zis movie is made to make fool look good!!!!

    • @QueenieKoopa
      @QueenieKoopa 3 роки тому +2

      no its because it was executed so poorly

    • @JennWest-Liberty
      @JennWest-Liberty 2 роки тому +11

      I wondered if by we never really die they mean that we come from energy and return to energy, or that our archetypes are constantly reborn.

  • @stevegovea1
    @stevegovea1 4 роки тому +352

    I never thought Lucy influenced or created any history during the last sequence, I always thought she was somehow traveling through time seeing events unfold.

    • @ms.nicolediasgreene3841
      @ms.nicolediasgreene3841 3 роки тому +5

      So u didn’t understand the movie ?

    • @stevegovea1
      @stevegovea1 3 роки тому +33

      @@ms.nicolediasgreene3841
      I did. The problem with if you think she influenced or created an event....is the problem with the whole, what came first the chicken or the egg.

    • @shawnwales696
      @shawnwales696 2 роки тому +15

      The native Americans and the Astralopithecus afarensis cleary saw her.

    • @TheTruthKiwi
      @TheTruthKiwi 2 роки тому +44

      Yeah, I thought the same Steve. Yes they saw her in each time jump but she didn't change anything. She seemed to be just observing and gaining knowledge.

    • @cccpredarmy
      @cccpredarmy 2 роки тому +17

      @@TheTruthKiwi her "duty" was to carry on information so she did with the early primate "Lucy" by touching her and giving her the impulse for revolutionionary development (fast and explosive, like we see humanity now, in contrast to slow evolutionairy development )

  • @MLGninja101
    @MLGninja101 4 роки тому +383

    The only person worthy to analyze a crazy ending is a crazy man

    • @biblebot3947
      @biblebot3947 4 роки тому

      L1qu1d S1lenc3r well they clearly did a shit job if they don’t even understand the whole shtick with Lucy

  • @walterengler5709
    @walterengler5709 4 роки тому +538

    The scene of Lucy touching the ape was clearly a representation of the Sistine Chapel and God touching Man (the finger tips so easy to see). But this was Lucy touching .. Lucy ( the supposed mother of us all). Now I do NOT think she granted humanity intelligence at that point despite the finger tip touch. But it was a symbolic closing of the circle from where humanity evolved up to the point she exists and loop back around. Also I do not think that Lucy triggers the big bang or creation or any of that crap. That is reading far too much into the whole thing. But instead she does evolve / ascend her cells to be part of or one with all of creation (hence at the end she is everywhere). She witnesses how everything is created, merges into that point of creation, and becomes one with it all.

    • @trevonyoung7782
      @trevonyoung7782 3 роки тому +28

      I think this is pretty spot on dude

    • @DzR1591
      @DzR1591 3 роки тому +6

      exactly read my comment and its the best way to describe her understanding and why she was able to do all that at the end.
      I agree with you brother 💯

    • @matthewJ142
      @matthewJ142 3 роки тому +3

      She's supposed to be called eve but I guess they liked lucy better.

    • @walterengler5709
      @walterengler5709 3 роки тому +5

      @@matthewJ142 Well Karen was already well used so.... lol

    • @philliperodriguez5063
      @philliperodriguez5063 3 роки тому +16

      Totally agree, my og theory was that it was her experiencing the entirety of the universe in order to grow her knowledge to truly transfer everything she saw and learned onto the usb, (the black tubes being worm holes and in connection to another theory that wormholes are just two points in space folding to connect)

  • @kaygenyse3198
    @kaygenyse3198 4 роки тому +519

    I’ve never heard of anyone not liking this movie

    • @tangoseal1
      @tangoseal1 4 роки тому +15

      I thought it was horrendous. And I bet you didnt even see the mind control playing in it.

    • @jamesholmstrom5837
      @jamesholmstrom5837 4 роки тому +42

      I liked the movie and don't know anyone that hated it, except maybe the one person in my circle that generally hates everything. He probably does...
      And i was not mind controlled to watch it. Now join RAID Sha...bleh...

    • @andrikpozos6194
      @andrikpozos6194 4 роки тому +1

      Eric Owens why u think it was horrendous it was amazing

    • @ausstreet_culture143
      @ausstreet_culture143 4 роки тому +1

      @@tangoseal1 what do you mean by that?

    • @kiddfaith4397
      @kiddfaith4397 4 роки тому +5

      @@tangoseal1
      I totally get why a lot of people think it’s horrendous; from a structural point of view the plot is flawed and they characters are shallow. I love it because it’s a good movie for when I just want to relax and not really think about much, and for the visuals. Both views are fine; like it or hate it. But if you’re saying there’s mind control imbedded in the visuals or sound, then wouldn’t the director and writers have put a lot more effort into making it appeal to a wider audience?
      That’s like saying that someone created a mind control candy but chose the flavour of black licorice, or created a mind control perfume that smells like Durian fruit. 😂

  • @Mkultra1186
    @Mkultra1186 4 роки тому +564

    I cried like a baby at the end of Lucy the first time I watched it. It’s one of the most beautiful films I’ve ever seen.

    • @oleytash
      @oleytash 4 роки тому +55

      Because instinctively you understood even if you couldn't comprehend

    • @stonedsimian2871
      @stonedsimian2871 4 роки тому +4

      Lol

    • @ThatMakesSenseToMe
      @ThatMakesSenseToMe 4 роки тому +4

      ua-cam.com/video/tUzl4l1kutY/v-deo.html You might like my alternate explanation then. I also cried in a different context about the same thing.

    • @sirenssorrowsolemn
      @sirenssorrowsolemn 4 роки тому +2

      Sameee

    • @machinegunalii7001
      @machinegunalii7001 3 роки тому +1

      Lol same with me 🤣

  • @Pennsylvania343
    @Pennsylvania343 4 роки тому +854

    I thought this movie was really interesting I don't really know why people hated this movie so much

    • @andreiiiksavvv6054
      @andreiiiksavvv6054 4 роки тому +146

      People hate what they don't understand

    • @michaelwhitmire9015
      @michaelwhitmire9015 4 роки тому +22

      This movie was trying to be akira,notice the ending with her being able to see the universe even the big bang

    • @DavidMartinez-ce3lp
      @DavidMartinez-ce3lp 4 роки тому +16

      I simply could not swallow the incompetence of the drug smugglers and that they treated this as if it was any old ordinary drug. That just sticks with me, and that's what I think of when I think of this movie.

    • @michaelwhitmire9015
      @michaelwhitmire9015 4 роки тому +9

      If this is a drug then she must not be the only one,i mean they was selling it illegally there must be more

    • @Jeremyhughes86
      @Jeremyhughes86 4 роки тому +6

      @@michaelwhitmire9015 only thing is... Tetsuo and the Espers didn't simply witness the big bang. they created an alternate, parallel universe. which is why the movie ends with the line. "I am Tetsuo" he birth a universe from his very being. expanding outward endlessly both as the god of this new universe and the building blocks, the foundation from which it is born, along with, and with the help of he Espers or "the numbers" if you prefer to call them that.

  • @jimpatrick5918
    @jimpatrick5918 4 роки тому +159

    The “ape” she touches in the end was the same one in the museum named Lucy. Causal loop completed.

    • @RandomInternetProfile
      @RandomInternetProfile 2 роки тому +4

      Wow, so you're saying the museum was never really there, but also everywhere at the same time. Fascinating. Reminds me of the hook & loop/shoelace paradox demonstrating simplicity while at the same time, so complex, its unfathomable.

  • @vincentrusso4332
    @vincentrusso4332 Рік тому +11

    Her rewinding time , that scene deserves some type of award for awesomeness

  • @BXgek
    @BXgek 2 роки тому +11

    I am a Dutch man of 72 years old and have seen films for about 60 years, you can name all the classics, I estimate that there may be more than 1000 ... I have seen very good films such as D-Day 5 times .. ..but I have now seen Lucy 11x (!) on Netflix, where he can still be seen…
    I am very captivated by the underlying story such as the Big Bang and how the earth came to life…both Scarlett and Morgan play very well in this film, otherwise I wouldn't have watched it after 1x.

  • @zerefdragneel5767
    @zerefdragneel5767 4 роки тому +587

    moral of story : taking too much drug will turn u into usb drive..

    • @cristinitacorazon3377
      @cristinitacorazon3377 4 роки тому +11

      😆😆😆😆😆

    • @angelsanchez9417
      @angelsanchez9417 4 роки тому +5

      Hard and black?

    • @switzerlandful
      @switzerlandful 4 роки тому +9

      I thought she basically turned into some sort of non-local being in the end (a being not limited by 3D space) . She said, "I'm everywhere". That was the message she sent that detective on his cell phone.

    • @angelsanchez9417
      @angelsanchez9417 4 роки тому +5

      89792131121607920 math is cool I thought it was a being in time where shes everywhere at any point in time. But yeah about right

    • @Jervin-Music
      @Jervin-Music 4 роки тому +6

      Comments don’t usually make me laugh out loud but yours did sir

  • @JailanSimon
    @JailanSimon 4 роки тому +190

    Concludes with the USB stick lol. Loved this movie

  • @mintythedemon1785
    @mintythedemon1785 4 роки тому +278

    I would be so happy if you made some sort of psychoanalysis of characters from Scooby Doo Mystery Incorporated! Before the finale, the majority of them NEED therapy! My favorite characters are Angel, Mr.E and Marcie!

    • @imacloud.
      @imacloud. 4 роки тому +15

      Omg. Yes! I love Mystery Incorporated! That would be so cool!!

    • @fugo5464
      @fugo5464 4 роки тому +8

      Yes plz

    • @trixxartarchive7705
      @trixxartarchive7705 4 роки тому +5

      OMG I loved watching that show when I was a kid.

    • @imacloud.
      @imacloud. 4 роки тому +5

      @@trixxartarchive7705 Me too!!

    • @chocov1233
      @chocov1233 4 роки тому +4

      I completely agree. Mystery Incorporated was a fantastic.

  • @The_graye269
    @The_graye269 4 роки тому +220

    It's basically the theory that we're all the universe observing it's self

  • @SasuNaruL0vR80
    @SasuNaruL0vR80 3 роки тому +151

    this is my favorite movie of all time because it makes you THINK (for those willing to that is). It's a mind blowing way to show what people are actually capable of and what we Could be capable of if we put our minds to it (hence "Life was given to us a billion years ago. What have we done with it?" & "Life was given to us a billion years ago. Now you know what to do with it."). The juxtaposition with the gazelle and her going into the hotel at the beginning is showing instincts, as in "Something's wrong; I'm not safe!". Since we can watch something like that, a gazelle being hunted and it realizing that something dangerous is out there, recognizing what the slightest look around means, it shows that all people have those same instincts because they were passed on from animal to early human to us, now having it ingrained so deeply in our roots that we are born with that knowledge just like we are born with the ability to form words and move. When she goes through time it shows that we, as a species, have done a LOT yet no one really thinks about it. If you sit down with it and really watch it, not just watch a movie but really let all the juxtapositions and visuals help you put together the puzzle, you find that, although it's science fiction, there's a very profound message about human beings and how little we actually know about ourselves, the Earth, the universe, and time. It's a movie about knowledge and how we Have to pass on what we know to anyone and everyone we can to advance the species. That is how we have come so far: by learning and passing on knowledge to each other. Animals learned how to sense danger, early humans observed that knowledge and used it themselves. Now look where we are; we have so many instincts and have learned so much. Whether it's about quantum physics or just talking about how beautiful the trail you walked last week was; every little thing we think of and that we take in from our surroundings is knowledge. It could be the knowledge that something is incredibly important or the knowledge that something is bullsh*t, it's all the same: still knowledge to pass on. The reason the characters/plot aren't very interesting is because, simply put, they aren't needed. The movie is about knowledge not characters, hence why Lucy becomes less and less emotional and less relatable; she is becoming a "sponge for knowledge". This makes people hate it because people want to relate to characters but you cannot relate to knowledge; only try to understand it. The characters are there so we can understand the movie; to "bring it down to human size and make it comprehensible". That is the true meaning of this film, at least from my stand point. So, go take a good long watch and see what knowledge you receive when you keep an open mind and WANT to look for knowledge.

    • @Stickyfingerz1798
      @Stickyfingerz1798 Рік тому +10

      Couldn’t have said it any better feel people just hate the movie because they don’t like diving into anything in general let alone searching for the deeper meaning in things

    • @kahzmirh7778
      @kahzmirh7778 Рік тому +7

      Your explanation is underrated. In fact you brought forth what I’ve caught in the movie but broke it down even better than my initial understanding. Beautifully explained.

    • @BIGNOSEPOPPA
      @BIGNOSEPOPPA Рік тому +2

      Great comment.

    • @AntonioBaldo-fh7wg
      @AntonioBaldo-fh7wg Рік тому +1

      ❤!!

    • @hernandez4856
      @hernandez4856 10 місяців тому

      that’s not how knowledge is passed on

  • @spacechimp5141
    @spacechimp5141 4 роки тому +81

    I loved this film. I wasn't aware this film was hated.

  • @Buzterer
    @Buzterer 4 роки тому +343

    So, the movie is just a drug trip or Scarlett Johansson turned into Dr Manhattan. yay

  • @pedrourbano501
    @pedrourbano501 4 роки тому +66

    Man i got so confused when i watched this movie but i liked It thank you for trying to explaning it.

  • @petesquire2954
    @petesquire2954 26 днів тому +3

    One of the most understated movies ever.

  • @kiddfaith4397
    @kiddfaith4397 4 роки тому +26

    I’ve rewatched this movie several times; not because of the (flawed) plot, or the (lack of) character development, but because of the visuals and the head trip watching this is. Sometimes we need to just sit back, relax and enjoy the ride in the here and now to enjoy something, and I sometimes enjoy watching content that I don’t have to think too hard about.

    • @FOTOJADAMOstudio
      @FOTOJADAMOstudio Рік тому +1

      The plot felt rushed, almost like the studio requested a re-edit to make it more action and less cerebral. 90min is not enough time to develop a character for this subject matter.

    • @kiddfaith4397
      @kiddfaith4397 Рік тому +1

      @@FOTOJADAMOstudio
      Agreed. They tried to do too much in too little time.

    • @ireallyreallyhategoogle
      @ireallyreallyhategoogle Рік тому

      You can't have more character development than Lucy going from a woman dumb enough to date that creep to basically a goddess.

    • @LeahIsHereNow
      @LeahIsHereNow 5 місяців тому

      Give this man a cookie! It’s just a fun movie.

  • @omaribrahim9271
    @omaribrahim9271 4 роки тому +55

    "You never really die."
    "I am everywhere."

    • @jomeyer13
      @jomeyer13 Рік тому

      could it be a form of rebirth one dies and comes back as a butterfly or a puppy. several rebiths through the life forms.

  • @carlcarolino4685
    @carlcarolino4685 4 роки тому +81

    Lucy is;
    Omniscient, she knows everything.
    Omnipotent, she can literally do
    ANYTHING
    and
    Omnipresent, she is everywhere...
    You see where this going?
    Yeah,
    GODLIKE !

    • @Glock9999999
      @Glock9999999 4 роки тому +2

      But but adam and eve!!!

    • @eespvz5783
      @eespvz5783 4 роки тому +2

      Lucy = lucifer

    • @wr842
      @wr842 4 роки тому +1

      ismail Cem Eroglu .....we get it....you want to bang Satan....no need to try to defend & rationalize it.

    • @wr842
      @wr842 4 роки тому +1

      ismail Cem Eroglu ....no. You are *NOT* stating facts. Please attempt that on someone who hasn’t been in theology classes nearly their entire life or on someone who is ignorant to the Abrahamic God cultural history .
      If your *PERSONAL* research has led you to believe that “ Dante’s Inferno “ is the source of *ALL* the issues surrounding Lucifer’s standing-you need to look deeper.

    • @wr842
      @wr842 4 роки тому +1

      ismail Cem Eroglu the mere fact that you attribute Lucifer “getting a bad rap” to Dante’s work....which was in *1472* ...proves you either want to believe idiocy or you’re just highly mistaken in general.
      Lucifer was marked as demonic *CENTURIES BEFORE* 1472...and *CENTURIES BEFORE* Christianity *PERIOD* . Lucifer being wrong & evil isn’t a concept of Christianity.
      So once more... try that on someone stupid or is ignorant to the cultures of the Abrahamic God.
      You attempting to defend this further when a simplistic search with google by a novice theologian or anyone in general proves so much about your mental state.
      So yes it is funny...

  • @superman78621
    @superman78621 4 роки тому +345

    That "monkey" was supposed to be Lucy. The earliest ancestors of humans that we had known about

    • @dellab5705
      @dellab5705 4 роки тому +31

      Exactly, that’s a major point. I wonder why he left that out😏

    • @AudioAndroid
      @AudioAndroid 4 роки тому +26

      Wait wasnt Lucy the name that was giving to the Human Ancestor Skelton found by archologists?

    • @dellab5705
      @dellab5705 4 роки тому +8

      AudioAndroid, sure was

    • @AudioAndroid
      @AudioAndroid 4 роки тому +5

      @@dellab5705 Cool deal, I'm betting that was more than a coincidence. It makes me wonder if the entire movie was conceived during a "In Flight Movie" playing a Documentary about the amazing fossil discovery.

    • @josebatista2949
      @josebatista2949 4 роки тому +6

      Exactly so it was like she interacted with herself through time

  • @Deathawaits06
    @Deathawaits06 4 роки тому +48

    Teacher: The test won’t be that confusing
    The test**

  • @Censtudios
    @Censtudios 4 роки тому +50

    This movie has so much depth. You just gotta be able to see it

  • @AdventureDen101
    @AdventureDen101 4 роки тому +189

    She transcended 😏

    • @DavidMartinez-ce3lp
      @DavidMartinez-ce3lp 4 роки тому +11

      Just like that other movie. Transcendent

    • @ThatMakesSenseToMe
      @ThatMakesSenseToMe 4 роки тому +5

      @@DavidMartinez-ce3lp And with "Her" and "Arrival" lots of these movies goin around. ua-cam.com/video/tUzl4l1kutY/v-deo.html

    • @DavidMartinez-ce3lp
      @DavidMartinez-ce3lp 4 роки тому +3

      @@ThatMakesSenseToMe Coincidence? I THINK NOT!!!

    • @unkle_Enkil
      @unkle_Enkil 4 роки тому

      Or sublimed ?

  • @donnapower697
    @donnapower697 4 роки тому +9

    i absolutely love these universe/dimensional/multiverse movies that give their best theory of what they look like which can get so cool

    • @glockeii
      @glockeii 4 роки тому +1

      Anything similar you can recommend?

  • @carlthomaswilliamsjr.2995
    @carlthomaswilliamsjr.2995 4 роки тому +710

    When you realize all of creation came from a girl that was being shipped for drugs.

    • @deadtoallnohonornohope
      @deadtoallnohonornohope 4 роки тому +71

      Well fuck she basically became god which is pretty dope. Those drug dealers never knew who they were fucking with.

    • @fakereality4546
      @fakereality4546 4 роки тому +41

      I have feeling if they make a sequel it may show a higher power than her who lives beyond time and reality watching all this go down

    • @apalaluni
      @apalaluni 4 роки тому +5

      So ...
      that’s why our world are so crazy.

    • @RenoyGeorge
      @RenoyGeorge 4 роки тому

      Lol!!

    • @natashaford959
      @natashaford959 4 роки тому +1

      @L1qu1d S1lenc3r I wasn't created from a monkey or incest,,, I must be a alien

  • @OmniscientSloth
    @OmniscientSloth 4 роки тому +26

    I had a near death experience about 3 years before I saw this movie and when I saw the ending it gave me chills and flashbacks and was very similar to what I experienced when I left my body

    • @mariahfrancis8211
      @mariahfrancis8211 2 роки тому +1

      What🧍🏾‍♀️

    • @anik5579
      @anik5579 2 роки тому +2

      @@mariahfrancis8211 this is subjected to likes only. Chill.

    • @meatrealwishes
      @meatrealwishes 2 роки тому +1

      They call it void state. I'm struggling to reach it. I either fall asleep or simply lose my memory.

    • @jadebrior2400
      @jadebrior2400 Рік тому +5

      I had one too and I can relate because I overdosed and almost took my life. It was in a way nothingness was all around me. Its so hard to explain in words what I experienced, but it was like I was tethered in a single spot unable to move but floating. And I'm afraid of heights so it felt like how your feet dangle at the top of a ferris wheel. The fear of height. And I saw a dark void of nothingness in front of me. It was like pure darkness but I was able to see in the dark if that makes sense. It was just a wide void. Anyways there's more to the story about what happened with me. But anyways that was my experience out of body.

    • @BIGNOSEPOPPA
      @BIGNOSEPOPPA Рік тому +1

      ​@@jadebrior2400scary stuff.

  • @SupremeRGS
    @SupremeRGS 4 роки тому +116

    My theory was that she unlocked every part of her mind, and was able to access all of the information within all of her cells, and uncovered all history.

    • @davidgoossen113
      @davidgoossen113 3 роки тому +5

      GREAT!! Now, maybe, we can find out the truth if there was really a 2nd shooter in the grassy knoll on that day long ago, in Dallas.

    • @SupremeRGS
      @SupremeRGS 3 роки тому +1

      @@davidgoossen113 😄😄😄 there was

    • @DeepakRaj-zw6jj
      @DeepakRaj-zw6jj 3 роки тому +5

      Not only cells, till her last atom in each cells. As these atoms are present since the bing bang. Even if there is one atom remains in her, she remembered events till the big bang.

    • @bobsbuurgers3714
      @bobsbuurgers3714 Рік тому +5

      Like the akashic records... Also cells would have quantum entanglement and possibly predestination.

    • @ireallyreallyhategoogle
      @ireallyreallyhategoogle Рік тому +2

      Ya, not so much time travel and remembering.

  • @lauryn7158
    @lauryn7158 4 роки тому +115

    I like this movie, I think it's interesting

  • @Unknown-sg4tv
    @Unknown-sg4tv 4 роки тому +33

    Safety Time Machine
    1. Automatic door lock.
    2. Goes invisible.
    3. Has camera/TV inside so time travellers can only observe history.

    • @japr1223
      @japr1223 4 роки тому +8

      Iv pondered whether going back in time puts you out of phase, in a way that you can see the past but it can't see you. That would explain why it's possible but we haven't seen any time travelers.

    • @andykapsar4667
      @andykapsar4667 4 роки тому +2

      replace your invisibility option with a device that lets it blend itself to the terrain around it, then that device breaks so its stuck looking like a bobby box 👍

    • @salaciousBastard
      @salaciousBastard 4 роки тому +2

      @@andy123783 That's called time viewing.

  • @ianstradian
    @ianstradian 4 роки тому +68

    Of all the people I’ve spoken to about this film not one person hates it.
    Most actually liked it.
    I saw this in a theater and paid full theatre price, and I still say I liked the film.

  • @paulmoitoso9658
    @paulmoitoso9658 4 роки тому +35

    God damn, that has to be one of the most intense mind fuck movies in existence, my brain is literally screaming In confusion.

    • @Limitbreak09
      @Limitbreak09 2 роки тому

      You should watch tenet 💀💀💀

    • @LouWop817
      @LouWop817 2 місяці тому

      Nah watch inception

  • @bw8685
    @bw8685 7 місяців тому +1

    I been saying for years this is the best representation of the big bang ever seen in a movie. I have yet to see it matched. The formation of the Earth is insane. But around the time it was playing in the movies everybody who watched it just called me crazy for enjoying it so much. All these years later I'm glad I found this video. And lets not even talk about the soundtrack. God's Whisper is God tier.

  • @phantasam_3559
    @phantasam_3559 4 роки тому +127

    I actually enjoy this movie lmao

  • @DavidMartinez-ce3lp
    @DavidMartinez-ce3lp 4 роки тому +140

    They smuggled this drug as if it was a regular old drug. I don't think you can get any dumber.

    • @fakereality4546
      @fakereality4546 4 роки тому +21

      I thi k it would of made more sense if the Government was kidnapping people and experimenting on people

    • @DavidMartinez-ce3lp
      @DavidMartinez-ce3lp 4 роки тому +6

      @@fakereality4546 I could buy that

    • @internziko
      @internziko 4 роки тому +4

      They didn't know

    • @pinkomega5329
      @pinkomega5329 4 роки тому +9

      No but you can be a lazy writer.

    • @eatmedrinkme9628
      @eatmedrinkme9628 4 роки тому +17

      Because to stupid drug dealers it was just another drug, they didn't know the potential of it. They just wanted to make money on a new designer drug.

  • @queendsheena1
    @queendsheena1 4 роки тому +6

    I love Lucy so seeing you theorize this film makes me really happy.

  • @ezekielbrown9397
    @ezekielbrown9397 2 роки тому +2

    This is one of the most best movies I've ever seen

  • @juliestevens6931
    @juliestevens6931 3 роки тому +17

    I really liked this movie. I thought Scarlett Johansson was fascinating to watch as well as Morgan Freeman. Yes, there are a lot flaws in the science, but still a captivating movie.

  • @tartagliussy529
    @tartagliussy529 4 роки тому +27

    I'll pretend that I've had enough time to watch the whole thing, great vid 👍

  • @mattyrr9627
    @mattyrr9627 4 роки тому +18

    I really like your points The Theorizer! My theory is that actually the "jellyfish" looking things were forming nebulas like you said however I was intrigued that they looked like spermatozoids, and the opening of light looked like a uterus. If you look at human egg fertilization it basically looks the same, meaning we have many universes inside of us already and we are part of some even bigger, larger multiverse. And what the hell do we know, the nebulas might actually be giant space spermatozoids trying to fertilize - create life. The black siwrly thing in my opinion represents genetic material, meaning the nebulas/spermatozoids fertilized the egg and now the genetic code is being spread, creating yet another form of life. Remember, there is a possibility that the Earth is just an egg too! :)

    • @marciamartins1976
      @marciamartins1976 Рік тому +2

      I'm with you on this theory, since like 2007 I had this insight after reading the Biology of Belief.

  • @kjsunderworld7964
    @kjsunderworld7964 4 роки тому +45

    99% of this video i was thinking "finally someone else who has caught onto the same theory as i did with this film!"
    And then right at the end you gonna just....... SHATTER that by saying "or it's just a trip she experienced " which is n option i for some reason hadn't considered even once and....... just.... my brain is broken and idk what to do with the broken pieces lmfao

    • @TheTruthKiwi
      @TheTruthKiwi 2 роки тому

      @Fetus for Jesus This would be an interesting movie to watch while tripping.

  • @leem.5246
    @leem.5246 4 роки тому +9

    Honestly I really liked it, I haven’t watched it in years, but I remember being excited because it was the first r rated movie I was allowed to watch and 11 year old me at it up.

  • @LyfaLeeZhure_DavidShawn
    @LyfaLeeZhure_DavidShawn 4 роки тому +7

    Hated "Lucy" when I saw it in the theatre. Years later, caught it in reruns on TV. When you really take the time to ponder the themes that lead up to the ending...it's actually very cool, deep, and existential. New respect for this flick. It also helps that Scar-Jo is just pure perfection. Colin Jost is one lucky bastard.

  • @freedompancakes301
    @freedompancakes301 4 роки тому +9

    Nobody:
    Nobody ever:
    The Theorizer: So the 670000th Dimension is

  • @blakepeters4137
    @blakepeters4137 4 роки тому +73

    I have a theory, are all Steven King's movies take place in the same universe? If so does that mean every creature is just Pennywise taking a new form to scare people?

    • @ginabrian6145
      @ginabrian6145 4 роки тому +9

      I read Steven King's books. I let me just say when the books mention one another. Like, in Needful Things. Alan mentions Cujo and that just blows my mind. And George Stark from The Dark Half.

    • @MarshmallowThighs
      @MarshmallowThighs 4 роки тому +10

      You should read the dark tower series it explains a lot of the monsters and the strange powers some of his characters have.

    • @ginabrian6145
      @ginabrian6145 4 роки тому +2

      @@MarshmallowThighs You are right, I should.

    • @constantine9142
      @constantine9142 4 роки тому +1

      @@MarshmallowThighs my dad did and tells me that as well. I'll get to it eventually right now I'm getting pumped for the stand remake!

    • @sbritton1313
      @sbritton1313 4 роки тому +4

      just so you know, Steven King has mentioned all his books are linked... No, Pennywise is its own evil entity... Pennywise is an unknown entity however... my theory on pennywise is that he is a sentient fungus... he is awoken by spilled blood, he is only satisfied by spilled blood, he "wakes up every so many years" (I keep forgetting how many it is) but that would be a dormant cycle before he must spread his spores again to try to grow stronger... usually once every generation... he feeds on fear and death... and his spores can help him induce hillucinations in his victims...
      at least that's my theory...

  • @mrhypo78
    @mrhypo78 4 роки тому +6

    Wow never thought about the ending being about her creating the universe. I always just thought she went back to witness the creation of the universe. I need to watch this again. Have watched many times. Great movie!

  • @MrWphilips
    @MrWphilips 3 роки тому +31

    The bottom-line is that this an amazing acting performance. Scarlet goes through an incredible array of emotional states. This the most important component of the entire film. The plot is simply a what if- plus a master class in immersive performance.

    • @RandomInternetProfile
      @RandomInternetProfile 2 роки тому +1

      Yep, the theoretical physics concepts mean nothing. The entire plot was constructed only for her (the specific actress) to portray various emotions. 🙄

    • @rozyborsalino3709
      @rozyborsalino3709 2 роки тому +1

      ≤🤠;🎞️✨📺✨🎞️&🎬…

    • @rozyborsalino3709
      @rozyborsalino3709 2 роки тому +1

      @@RandomInternetProfile≤🤠;🎞️✨📺✨🎞️&🎬…

    • @ireallyreallyhategoogle
      @ireallyreallyhategoogle Рік тому

      YES!
      And what a great What If, so well-made.

  • @randallhunt9170
    @randallhunt9170 6 місяців тому

    One of my favorite movies. It's just interesting and fun, and explores those theories. And that's all it is. An exploration of those various theories.

  • @itsthannotthen470
    @itsthannotthen470 3 роки тому +6

    I've watched this like ten times already. I don't know why other people hate it.

  • @jonathanappling9248
    @jonathanappling9248 4 роки тому +26

    Narrrator: this movie is the closest to space odessy. Also Narrator: I never actaully saw space odessy I only saw the trailer

  • @Scififan926
    @Scififan926 4 роки тому +32

    *Me listening to the video while playing*
    “or maybe it was just a drug trip during her time in jail”
    *Boss music stops”
    HOLD ON

  • @RA-ji6ej
    @RA-ji6ej Рік тому +1

    For me its masterpiece, it got good music, graphics, plot, actors and concept.

  • @SafariPlum
    @SafariPlum 4 роки тому +1

    I adore the concise way you put these theories together to explain this intriguing movie's ending.

  • @AmenRaValentine
    @AmenRaValentine 4 роки тому +9

    I love this movie, a different perspective

  • @jkkarkar
    @jkkarkar Рік тому +5

    Rewatched this movie today and I thoroughly enjoy it every single time I do. This time I especially caught the line in the movie where Lucy says "We never really die.", after the detective says, "I'd rather be late than dead.", in the car chase scene. I think at that point she is at 50% which suggests she understands at her current capacitive brain function, or rather, she knows at her current capacity that life is far more complex, and humans aren't capable of seeing this. Later in the film they talk about humans having a unit of measuring as being one. 1 plus 1 = 2; Math being the unit of measure but our bodies are comprised of many cells communicating with one another through electrical impulses and that jumbled mass of cells form matter, our bodies or physical objects we can see and touch as we understand it at 10% brain capacity but in fact Time is the true unit of measure. It gets so much deeper than that when you really think about what the director is trying to convey and if you have an open mind about it, you can really appreciate this movie for what it is.
    In summary, we live as 3 dimensional beings but stop and think of our cells singularly each existing in a 4th dimensional plane. We aren't just in one place, we exist everywhere so in essence we never really are dead or alive for that matter.
    Is it true, is it pseudoscience or fringe science, possibly? Can we dismiss it as so, unlikely.

  • @kenndarellgilera7552
    @kenndarellgilera7552 4 роки тому +41

    Lucy in the end turn her self in to the dark mater/dark energy the most powerful mater in the whole universe
    That holds the galaxy together

    • @ioniiKxFreeZeX
      @ioniiKxFreeZeX 4 роки тому +8

      Possibly the multiverse

    • @billyhomeyer7414
      @billyhomeyer7414 3 роки тому

      Dark matter does not exist. You’ll know this in about five years.

    • @kenndarellgilera7552
      @kenndarellgilera7552 3 роки тому

      @@billyhomeyer7414 How did you know?

    • @billyhomeyer7414
      @billyhomeyer7414 3 роки тому

      Probably the same place you found out in two years, you will find out in two years. Gotta go my teleport is ready.

    • @joshusher2493
      @joshusher2493 3 роки тому +1

      Apologies for arbitrary message but I got too excited to resist when I saw this comment. Dark energy is PRECISELY what I conceptualize Lucy branching out into - contemporary astronomers now know that there are an uncountable number of actual filament-like structures all throughout the universe, composed of dark matter; they stretch across lightyears in order to connect distant galaxies together. Yes, I’m would classify the universe as one enormous network. Now, a quick thought on the scalability issues with the atomic versus celestial comparisons in the given cosmos - as a mathematician, I am drawn to one beautifully concise example of an amazing 1:1 ratio mapping between systems - the average number of neurons in a healthy human brain and the number of stars in our galaxy - both have been ubiquitously tallied to bear some hundred billion neurons and stars, respectfully. So now, with the synaptic and nerve channels providing a network of cerebral channels connecting neurons in our brains, and the dark energy we know networks the constituents of a galaxy (and beyond), is it too brash to just take the damn leap and call the human brain for what it seems to be - the quintessential microcosm of the greater universe? Patterns have always been helpful during the multiple
      centuries we humans have existed and initiated this ongoing sojourn for truths from the cosmos… A pattern, though disputable I’m sure, I recently came to recognize in justifying the universe neural network theory from before is the “swirl” shape that the Milky Way seems to emulate (as do numerous other distant observed galaxies). While I’d like to think the swirl formation of the Milky Way is the consequence of being hurled violently about the rim of the event horizon of Sagittarius B, the supermassive black hole at its center, I cannot confirm that our supermassive black hole is indeed responsible for the formation of our galaxy. What I find more interesting is the continued theme of our brains being models of the cosmos - especially once one looks at the swirl we all have at the topmost center of our scalps (positioned perfectly such that the pattern residing above the neural network, growing outward without prejudice to any Boy Scout compass. If enabled to grow, human hair will distribute into arms from the spiral - a clear similarity to the arms of our galaxy (one of which our solar system resides on of course). I welcome any any and all contrary feedback from anyone who has been itching for some diatribe or pugnacity. However, if you have custody of debatable counterpoints, I’d be thrilled to talk to anyone about this stuff!
      Thanks,
      -J

  • @anthonylosego
    @anthonylosego Рік тому

    This is the closest we will get in the near term future to understanding of everything. Yet at the same time it's also the farthest for so many reasons. Which is beautiful. A rare gem movie lost on the plebs.

  • @politicalfoolishness7491
    @politicalfoolishness7491 Місяць тому

    Great analysis. I've watched many key moments again and again on UA-cam. I love it.

  • @greglemieux9809
    @greglemieux9809 4 роки тому +25

    I really liked this movie. I went into it having no clue what to expect. Maby that's why I liked it so much. That and Scarlet Johansson.

  • @-notlukaXD-666
    @-notlukaXD-666 4 роки тому +7

    I loved this movie it was different and out of the box thinking just different than every other scifi movie made in the past 20 years plus scarlet is just hot af.

  • @bobsbuurgers3714
    @bobsbuurgers3714 Рік тому +4

    I always took it as her expanding her cognitive abilities to the point of accessing the alleged "Akashic Records"... Not her actually creating the universe. But your theory suggests that maybe the "records" of the universe are already encoded into us. In other words our cells *are* the Akashic record we are just too limited to access the information. Either way I liked the movie and I enjoy your theories.👍

  • @angelyroses
    @angelyroses 2 роки тому +1

    I was confused watching Lucy, and now I am even more confused watching an explanation video haha

    • @alextarot
      @alextarot Рік тому

      Last sentence in movie is "life was given to us billions years ago now you know what to do with it" i watched it and don't even know what just happened.. I'm like, become a computer? No thnx..

  • @treebrother
    @treebrother 8 місяців тому

    The visuals in this movie are incredible. love Morgan Freeman's line, "We humans are more concerned with having than with being".

  • @craigweaver8542
    @craigweaver8542 4 роки тому +16

    This movie was epic. I love her transformations, everything begins in the imagination.

    • @jomeyer13
      @jomeyer13 Рік тому

      imagination escape also has no real space or time. no boundries.

  • @Toni69498
    @Toni69498 4 роки тому +4

    Hahahahha this has never happened to me before I love you THEORIZER

  • @jarrettmosco9624
    @jarrettmosco9624 4 роки тому +7

    This was one of my favorite movies when I saw it, most of what I remember is Lucy completely owning a bunch of losers

  • @cmfort2696
    @cmfort2696 Місяць тому +2

    People hate themselves for not having an imagination.

  • @NeverKissSomeFrog123
    @NeverKissSomeFrog123 4 роки тому

    I loved the editing on it. It was a trip.

  • @ThatBlackPiano
    @ThatBlackPiano 3 роки тому +5

    I luv this movie! I think they did a excellent job considering the amount of detail they were trying to fit into the movie.

  • @DesmondBorcherds
    @DesmondBorcherds 4 роки тому +3

    Possibly the greatest movie ever made. Love your theories, just add vibrations to the cells.

  • @-Burs
    @-Burs 4 роки тому +4

    I really liked this movie. I actually watched it twice. And I'm sure I'd notice some new details in the third pass. Many dislike it, and I'd say it's because they don't understand it. One needs to be fairly open-minded in order to fully grasp the meaning of all the scenes in the movie.

  • @BombshElle_7
    @BombshElle_7 4 роки тому +1

    You explained this movie better than movie did. I didnt know WHAT I was looking at by the end, and I'm sure no one else did unless they studied this stuff. 🙄 Thank you for your knowledge.

  • @kimcutberth
    @kimcutberth Рік тому

    One of my favorite movie. Beautifully shoot. Good story.
    This is 1 of my Top Ten.

  • @tarocookie8006
    @tarocookie8006 4 роки тому +4

    Hated?I loved this movie and it was one of the best sci fi movies ever!

  • @oligarchytheatre777
    @oligarchytheatre777 4 роки тому +25

    PEOPLE HATE THEIR OWN SPIRITUALITY, THEIR HIGHER LEVELS OF THEMSELVES, TO LEARN, TO UPGRADE, TO BECOME MORE AND COMPREHEND LIFE AND NATURE AND YOUR EXPERIENCE WITHIN THE ALL, THE UNIVERSAL GRAND MIND!!!

    • @johnw1873
      @johnw1873 4 роки тому +3

      It's not their fault, they've been trained that way.

    • @senorjalapeno3937
      @senorjalapeno3937 4 роки тому

      That comes from someone with an pan african flag? Lol funny

    • @thedarkthrone4699
      @thedarkthrone4699 4 роки тому +1

      Yh why u had to tell it in caps

  • @arcadealchemist
    @arcadealchemist 4 роки тому +7

    The universe is a memory,

  • @niningsetia4213
    @niningsetia4213 6 місяців тому +1

    Thanks for your video
    GOD BLESS everyone
    Barakallah fiikum 😂❤❤❤❤

  • @marvinmartin4692
    @marvinmartin4692 10 місяців тому +1

    I loved it! It was awesome!!

  • @HEXE-ft5cv
    @HEXE-ft5cv 4 роки тому +5

    Hello fellow theorist!

  • @ecodeacon1
    @ecodeacon1 4 роки тому +7

    "Drug trip in the Jail cell"

  • @PokemonkaDub
    @PokemonkaDub 4 роки тому +17

    I was very confused by that ending and thought that she just died at the end, like, became one with the force/universe or something. but that makes sense!
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    I'm still waiting for theese Series of Unfortunate Events fires theories of yours!

  • @vincentrusso4332
    @vincentrusso4332 Рік тому

    I loved the movie, and the fact it premiered during the previews of Transcendence...whoooo, I already knew which movie I was gonna see next... L U C Y.

  • @rustycalloway1814
    @rustycalloway1814 4 роки тому +1

    This was one of my favorite movies of the time. I still watch it from time to time.

  • @daveherbert6215
    @daveherbert6215 3 роки тому +3

    I love Lucy. The actual premise of the movie that increasing the % of brain use to 100% via drugs is bat shit crazy. That said I really enjoyed the 'spectacle'. I found this film to be deeply philosophical (the kiss to remind Lucy of her humanity and we never really die) this combined with the kick ass violence make this exceptional. Much better than a film where the protagonist seeks revenge for a death of a loved one, such a cliche.
    We are built from the atoms that comprise the universe yet we are apart from the universe. Lucy then becomes one with the universe,. God dammit I've turned into a hippy. Excellent work Luc Besson.
    PS you must watch 2001 as it is a great movie but just as bat shit crazy

  • @user-mm2zj3mz3u
    @user-mm2zj3mz3u 4 роки тому +47

    Not gonna lie I tough this movie was representing Lucy from Elfen lied

    • @jamerrose3991
      @jamerrose3991 4 роки тому +1

      Omg I was thinking the same thing

    • @DerrBeezy
      @DerrBeezy 4 роки тому

      Nahh and that anime is amazing a masterpiece for me

  • @AJSSPACEPLACE
    @AJSSPACEPLACE 4 роки тому +5

    Is time actually a real phenomenon? Or is it just our mind noticing a consistently paced sequence?

    • @MikinessAnalog
      @MikinessAnalog 4 роки тому

      Time is what allows us to perceive changes. This is one reason sensory deprivation chambers do what they do. We have no input to gauge change while inside one other than our internal clocks.

    • @G-MEISTER6
      @G-MEISTER6 4 роки тому

      @@MikinessAnalog But it could be said that we're merely perceiving change, not time itself. Things change, time does not. So without time, things will still change but without change, time will not. It'll stay the same. Time is a social construct.

    • @JcoleMc
      @JcoleMc Рік тому

      @@G-MEISTER6 It's not a social construct time is very real ,you need time to move through space

  • @maxkim7937
    @maxkim7937 3 роки тому

    it's funny how i understood the movie on my first watch. just watched it today. it made sense and i didn't realize there was a problem understanding it

  • @arbee7327
    @arbee7327 2 роки тому

    I love this breakdown. Great job.

  • @gr3ywolf144
    @gr3ywolf144 4 роки тому +6

    I actually thought of this idea a while ago; about there being a causal loop for the existence of this universe. An event within the universe happens that ultimately causes the universe to begin, very paradoxical. But i realized that this is nonsensical.

    • @Noryle
      @Noryle 3 роки тому

      This is basically Homestuck…

  • @gerwynjones6862
    @gerwynjones6862 4 роки тому +3

    Unfortunately, Hyperverse theory needs no big bang, the big bang is a product of time, which in turn is a product of the hyperverse.

  • @leiajiang7877
    @leiajiang7877 4 роки тому +4

    One of my dads favorite, cause hes an old man who wants to be powerful

    • @covid-19ispsychologicalwar10
      @covid-19ispsychologicalwar10 4 роки тому

      Leia Jiang or he just likes to observe some prime T&A matinee

    • @-VaLaK
      @-VaLaK 4 роки тому

      Leia Jiang shiiiiiit, someone got some buried Daddy issues 😳

  • @BorkPlays
    @BorkPlays 4 роки тому +1

    That wasn't just any monkey, it was Lucy (Australopithecus) AL 288-1! I like your interpretation

  • @tdickens92
    @tdickens92 2 роки тому +1

    I absolutely LOVE this fucking movie. The time Square scene blew me away. Just absolutely insane. There could have been more to it making it like a matrix type storyline but, it still has me. Hook, line, and sinker. Beautiful

  • @bm-ub6zc
    @bm-ub6zc 4 роки тому +10

    it was actually wise, to start this video with the sentence: "it was a hated movie"

  • @fedoratheexplorer2038
    @fedoratheexplorer2038 3 роки тому +3

    Great analysis. My theory for the scene where you say Lucy meets the 'monkey' is that Lucy actually met an ancient hominid. Particularly 'Lucy' who is classified as Australopethicus afarensis. This is because Lucy was travelling back in time and so it showed a glimpse of human evolution. You can actually look up the 'Lucy' fossil that was discovered in Ethiopia ( a country in East Africa that many anthropologists regard as where mankind originated.)

    • @RandomInternetProfile
      @RandomInternetProfile 2 роки тому +1

      Velcro is based on a hook and loop system. It is far more superior to the shoelace. The shoelace is essentially one single flowing loop and hook system. The shoelace is a representation of only 10% of the 100% of hooks and loops used to achieve this analysis. Therefore, the shoelace, is inferior and thus using only 10% of its potential.

  • @DraconaiMac
    @DraconaiMac 4 роки тому +5

    I liked it. Science aside its a "what if" movie.

    • @angelaanaconda5837
      @angelaanaconda5837 3 роки тому

      Omg I just finished watching the channel and it explains so much. I hated this movie till I understood 1-4 type civilizations.

  • @pseudoname3159
    @pseudoname3159 4 роки тому +1

    I actually saw this movie after taking 2 grams of cubensis. It was hard to follow and the whole movie I was just grasping for meaning. But when the ending sequence played I knew exactly what was going on and I was staring at the screen in awe.

  • @Soulsomecooking
    @Soulsomecooking 3 роки тому +1

    Epic movie ! Not everyone can understand the depth of the information it has. Perhaps it’s a way universe communicates to us... had goose bumps when I saw “I am everywhere” 10/10 for me ...