E-Signatures vs. Digital Signatures (In About A Minute)

E-signature vs. digital signature: www.techtarget.com/searchcont...
E-signatures and digital signatures have both brought convenience to authenticating important documents in the digital age. And while they’re similar, they're not the same. E-signatures have the same legal standing as a handwritten, or “wet,” signature, but digital signatures have added layers of security and authentication.
When do you use an e-signature versus a digital signature? Share your thoughts in the comments, and remember to like and subscribe too.
Subscribe to Eye on Tech: / eyeontech
Stay up to date on the latest content management news: www.techtarget.com/searchcont...
Follow us on Twitter: / ttbusinesstech
Like us on LinkedIn: / techtarget-business-te...
Like us on Facebook: / techtargetbusinesstech...
#Esignature #DigitalSignature #EyeOnTech

[@ana2277]

The good thing about esignatures, you can have a lot of people sign for you, if you're not around, and you can do the same for others. Yeah, it's easy to copy. It's nice to have actual writing outlawed.

[@nonelost1]

TRANSLATION: e-signatures are easier but riskier. Digital signatures are safer, but much more of a hassle. And I understand there is at least one other type of online signature. Anyway
you cut it, it’s all massive confusion! And I believe it was all intended to be that way. My investment firm starts out using “DocuSign”, then “Equipt”, and now “Osaic.” My financial advisor just told me a few minutes ago that the latter two have different purposes which I can’t remember. I think I’m just gonna stick with old fashioned wet signatures. They are still the most secure, which explains why some companies insist on using them still. 😤Thank you!

[@ScottFranklin-of3nz]

A descent video based on search on youtube