I am an owner of Luxman L509x integrated and at this moment i am running B&W 702 signature.I am thinking of upgrading to B&W 805d4 signature and i will kindly ask you for your opinion on this mach?Do you think that this model of Luxman has the power to drive them as well how you will describe the sound of b%w 805d4 signature vs 805d4 .Thanks in advance.
The Luxman 509X can drive the 805D4 speakers, but in larger spaces or at higher volumes, you might encounter some limitations. In fact, the 702 speakers you are currently using are even more challenging to drive. So, if you are satisfied with the performance of your 702 speakers, you should be similarly satisfied with the 805D4. However, it's essential to consider whether the bass output will be sufficient, as you may find that the 805D4 (whether it's the signature version or not) has slightly less bass compared to the 702. As for whether to opt for the signature version, it ultimately depends on your budget and whether you have a preference for the signature version's color.
Si vous aimez les aigus brillants, alors optez pour B&W. Son apparence est également très élégante et son image sonore est excellente. Cependant, si vous préférez la reproduction fidèle de l'espace sonore, si vous accordez de l'importance à la vivacité musicale, alors Focal est plus adapté.
@@feverSoundHK Just like McIntosh, B&W survives purely and only on its past reputation from 801 matrix era. Things have changed. Everyone in hifi knows they are not the best, deep in their hearts. The 805D4 suffers the usual problems of too much treble energy, recessed lower mids, and a 'ported' bass sound lacking speed. There are so many other better choices in its price range, like Magico A1, Borresen Z1 or even TAD ME1. Any one of these are easily way better than the B&W. Why should anyone choose the B&W? I don't know of a single thing that B&W does better than those speakers. None.
Your comment has a clear stance, and I'm not looking to engage in an argument with you. However, the bright nature of B&W's diamond tweeter is a characteristic of the design. The bass reflex port design is also quite common, and it's challenging to perceive this as a design flaw. I'd like to emphasize that we have tested many speakers, including the excellent ones you mentioned. They are not universally good or bad; their performance is tied to equipment matching and personal preferences. This is the fascinating aspect of audio.
同價錢，你喜歡高級嘅書架，定中級嘅細座地呢？
感覺座地勁啲，但係住嘅地方唔大反而書架會應該有更好嘅效果😆
一定是落地優先
🤣🤣考慮產地先
我鍾意書架喇叭！
書架
805 D4 真係好鬼正，如果我選都會簡寶籃色，可惜價錢偏貴，但音色真係好正😍感謝國仁評測，feverSound 團隊拍片真係冇得頂。加油！👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
feversound 的團隊影片真的是好耶🎊，有中文字幕很貼心❤
二選一，與其揀個普通座地，我寧願揀個質量好D嘅貴書架😂
有機會有空間都想試下座地，都算係to do list 之一。 Feversound 加油
地方細肯定係書架喇叭啦！
feverSound團隊加油～✌️😊
謝謝恭兄～
一定買書架，座地唔關地方大細事，係唔夠功力去玩
好正👍. Thanks 國仁， Thanks feverSound
feverSound 加油🤓🤓
謝謝 hang hang～（國仁）
前年換804D4冇後悔 好彩Signature 冇出804 ~
好靚聲
我意見，7系细落地的是低音量比较多，但多不等於靚低音，805可能在同一比较大空間可能低音量小，但高中低音质量一定勝於7系！玩hifi當然以靚聲優先！
書架，因為自己係，我都係用866去推。
Support
Thanks 東兄（國仁）
good
經典之作！ 🎉🎉🎉
錄音做得好好
想问一下，model 30 夠吳夠用。或搭什什麼M比较好
805 D4口水聲勁重，希望signature版有改善。
靚書架，有時聽歌都要有視覺享受
Nice review with English text
Thanks for subscribing
录音好赞，价格感人
屋企細，有冇咩All-in-one機可以配805 D4?
其實今次夾試的 Boulder 866 就是一部 all in one～
Still awaiting B&W signature speaker in a simplicity light colour
👍🏻😊
新背景好正
很詳細的講解了不同之處，非常棒！
打錯價錢ah🤣 9900個個都衝去買
原來睇錯😶😶
9900 係腳架呵～
Bowers and Wilkins B&W 805 D4 Signature 二路書架揚聲器售價：HK$76,000/對
專屬腳架 FS-805 D4 售價：HK$9,900/對
😂
聽歌房細size 用書架，大size 就一定用坐地喇叭啦！
玩書架最大好處是同時能玩幾對
hehe，但可能有啲人好任性，座地都玩幾對，當然係指佢地好有錢又有地方（國仁）
@@feverSoundHK有钱多多，两個房两套也不是問題。😅😅
1
2
唔通又係上代咁換皮!?
今次有誠意啲，改咗都幾多嘢～木皮、分音、高音罩、中低音驅動都有改動（國仁）
I am an owner of Luxman L509x integrated and at this moment i am running B&W 702 signature.I am thinking of upgrading to B&W 805d4 signature and i will kindly ask you for your opinion on this mach?Do you think that this model of Luxman has the power to drive them as well how you will describe the sound of b%w 805d4 signature vs 805d4 .Thanks in advance.
The Luxman 509X can drive the 805D4 speakers, but in larger spaces or at higher volumes, you might encounter some limitations. In fact, the 702 speakers you are currently using are even more challenging to drive. So, if you are satisfied with the performance of your 702 speakers, you should be similarly satisfied with the 805D4. However, it's essential to consider whether the bass output will be sufficient, as you may find that the 805D4 (whether it's the signature version or not) has slightly less bass compared to the 702.
As for whether to opt for the signature version, it ultimately depends on your budget and whether you have a preference for the signature version's color.
Thanks a lot for your replay!@@feverSoundHK
想請教：我要陳年burn in CD來煲佢（新買），有冇什麼要留意？我多年無玩音響了，點先算煲好對喇叭？見你有個short影住個喇叭膜嘅震動
其實都係無乜特別，唔好長時間開太大聲，以免令音圈過熱就ok（國仁）
ATC为什么不出高端馒头中音的三分频大书架
專業版SCM25A Pro才有（國仁）
細座地
886
期待測試
地方問題， 我會揀書架。
有用家在音响聊天网上话，听听下个礸石高音正面裂咗！
咁要搵返廠更換全新了，鑽石震膜非常薄非常硬，真係有機會裂（國仁）
Hi
耶！🎉
感謝 super thanks～（國仁）
請問Luxman L-507z夠唔夠推？
夠嘅👍🏻（國仁）
nice
中級嘅細座地
我揀個普通細座地.
國仁 😄👍
805 D4個書架喇叭要過10多萬鷄？！
說明欄一路有寫價錢㗎（國仁）
在未開箱之前 為什麼知道調聲味道唔同咗？
😝
How compare to recent review triangle 40th
J'ai une seule question pour faire mon choix et il meilleur le 805 D4 signature que le ( Focal Diablo Evo Utopia ) merci
Si vous aimez les aigus brillants, alors optez pour B&W. Son apparence est également très élégante et son image sonore est excellente. Cependant, si vous préférez la reproduction fidèle de l'espace sonore, si vous accordez de l'importance à la vivacité musicale, alors Focal est plus adapté.
Mon choix se porte sur le Focal Diablo Evo j'hésite avec l'enceinte tad micro evolution ces un choix difficile qu'en pensez-vous
有地方就坐地
Boulder 866 👍👍👍
下回報告就係佢（國仁）
一定正啦 ❤
👍💯🙏國仁加油
貴書架
有地方一定座地，情願食樹皮都要攻頂
十分佩服。👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻❤
國仁, 你覺得呢對書架難唔難推?
少少難，amp 要有質素，但比起以前的 B&W 是易了很多很多，我會放佢響難推喇叭入面最易推的那一批（國仁）
期待下次更靚！
請問用緊乜嘢喇叭線？🙏
Inakustik LS-603 / Ansuz X 兩對喇叭線都有用（國仁）
難道是電腦喇叭
😂
Heard these recently, and compared to the Borresen Z1. The Borresen makes these B&Ws sound like broken toys. Feel bad for anyone buying it.
I agree that Borresen makes excellent speakers, but B&W also has a strong reputation. I'm afraid I can't share your perspective.
@@feverSoundHK Just like McIntosh, B&W survives purely and only on its past reputation from 801 matrix era. Things have changed. Everyone in hifi knows they are not the best, deep in their hearts.
The 805D4 suffers the usual problems of too much treble energy, recessed lower mids, and a 'ported' bass sound lacking speed. There are so many other better choices in its price range, like Magico A1, Borresen Z1 or even TAD ME1.
Any one of these are easily way better than the B&W. Why should anyone choose the B&W? I don't know of a single thing that B&W does better than those speakers. None.
Your comment has a clear stance, and I'm not looking to engage in an argument with you. However, the bright nature of B&W's diamond tweeter is a characteristic of the design. The bass reflex port design is also quite common, and it's challenging to perceive this as a design flaw.
I'd like to emphasize that we have tested many speakers, including the excellent ones you mentioned. They are not universally good or bad; their performance is tied to equipment matching and personal preferences. This is the fascinating aspect of audio.
請問你說用三部amp試，也用了MF a1？如果是，a1只有25w但可唔可以應付到805d4 s 版？thank
鐵板燒都似模似樣喎，但就無咁幼細，同埋開大聲就開始無貨，不過都好正常，鐵板燒係聽歌仔好正，但再高要求就要好啲 amp（國仁）
@@feverSoundHK 希望MF再出A100啦
燒賣就燒賣，老虎蟹要坐地😂
二選一嘅話，揀座地😂
yeah～（國仁）