Nuh unh. You do NOT snore and add a sin when Sir Ian McKellen speaks. The rest, that they got wrong, sure... but nothing that man says is boring. He could read the label off a shampoo bottle and it would be great.
It would have been fun if Sophie constantly had little miracles like always finding a parking spot or encountering only green lights whenever she drove in the city happening around her.
That's almost every movie! One of the 50 shades had that when the main character pulled up to the building for an interview and the parking space DIRECTLY in front was available. 😂
it does she cures the druggie she drives the car backwards like she has done that exact route a hundred times and getting through the dump truck and bus. she also has the doves that distract the killer
The problem with this movie is that most of its mistakes aren’t present in the books and if they stuck to the books there would be way less mistakes here but then the movie would probably be like 5 hours long
@@m.m.1301 To be fair Dan Brown does a lot of research for his books. So although the ideas are abstract, the core ideologies are real. Much like House MD; the symptoms and diseases are well exaggerated for entertainment value, but (most) diseases are real.
I think it's closer to "I'm an atheist, but because I was raised Catholic I was taught from a young age that I am corruptible and essentially evil, I and every other human who was ever born has failed God repeatedly despite him loving and accepting us despite said failures, our failures were forgiven before we even committed the failures in the first place, of course we haven't actually done anything to earn that forgiveness, we are just that bad and God is that good, basically guilting us with a debt that we can never repay ever, We all collectively bear the responsibility of Original Sin, humans are so bad our species murdered Jesus when he came selflessly to save us at the cost of his own life and his mother's grief, and I was taught to always feel responsibility, guilt, and shame for all of my imperfections and thought crime the church calls temptation", or for some people, their very identity. I don't believe in God or original sin or that I am saved or anything like that, but I am still glad that I learned shame, because I think being ashamed of yourself is wiser more compassionate and more reflective than being shameless which is ignorant possibly self destructive and very selfish.
@@Milamberinx and their purpose. And that the King that commissioned the Knights Templar made charges against them. Unless all I've been able to find on those are incorrect, and there are no records of what they really were for and what happened, yet you somehow know.
"This nun leaves this room because a crazy albino dude in a jedi robe basically begs her to" I mean if Palpatine is asking you to leave a room I probably would
6:58 1976 was not a year of independence for Portugal. Either you mixed it up with 1974 the year Portugal overthrew their dictatorship, or 1975 the year a lot of Portuguese colonies became independent (due, in part, to the previous year's revolution). Portugal itself has been independent since 1143.
@@barbyonabike Actually the Catholics don't really hold to the Holy Bible as it's written, they use the Catholic Bible and The Book of Mass. There are a number of differences between them and the Protestant Holy Bible and they do not give the same credence to the shepherds as the Protestants do, which is why they sanctify Mary mother of Jesus as a saint when in Protestantism the worship and sanctification of others other than Jesus is not done and viewed as something the Catholics do to maintain control of their followers.
Regardless of the historical inaccuracies of the film I found it to be very enjoyable. A film with beautiful scenes of Paris at night, Ian McKellen and Audrey Tatou and also a wonderful soundtrack is always going to be something that I personally would enjoy. I also enjoyed the book and took it for what it is/was..... fiction
Oh but the story of Jesus and Mary have been around for a long time. I have books that was before The Da Vinci Code was made that talks of it. Now I agree this movie is fiction, but majority of the stuff said is true
Honestly the albino religious guy is my favourite character in this entire movie. Like everyone is just full of bullshit and inconveniences and thia guy is just straight up crazy with religion and killing people. Like yeah he's not a good man but whatever. He was at least INTERESTING
@@praisethelordgriffith8338 Yep, the book is waaaay better. Even though that is longer than the movie, I loved it so much. Because the longer it is the more scenes and awesome stuff that's happening unlike in the movie where they cut things short.
Oh, a friend of mine is a History professor and every term one or more of his medieval history students ALWAYS ask if Jesus took part in the Crusades to liberate Jerusalem. Guess they're the same kind of people who wrote this movie's script (I detest all things conspiracy theory, thence intensely dislike this movie. This, however, is no comment on the people who like it).
I don't know if we can really blame the people who wrote the script or Dan Brown himself for this. It's a work of fiction, afterall, and they are free to do whatever they want as long as the plot and the world they are creating is coherent. The problem comes with people who really think this kind of theories are real. I studied Philology and I was taught that, when analyzing a book or other works of art, the first thing to do is always to try to understand the historical context in which the book/painting... was created. It's important to know the author and, above all, to know that many of the things the authors put in their works weren't obscure for their audience (a good example is Dante. We don't know many references in Divina Commedia, but we are sure Dante knew the audience of his time understood perfectly what he meant). This means that seeing obscure symbols everywhere (in a Robert Langdon way) isn't exactly the correct way to analyze something, because often we tend to give to certain things meanings according to our context Once we had a lecture with an expert od Da Vinci's works, and he said he was sad to see people watch "L'ultima cena", see some kind of triangle somewhere and say that what Da Vinci wanted to tell was the untold story of Jesus. He said that by doing this these people missed the point. So, I don't think "The Da Vinci Code" is guilty of something. Personally I didn't like the book, but I understand its purpose. Like you, I can't stand people who see conspirancies everywhere, but I don't blame someone because he/she enjoyed a book.
I remember going to see this movie with my dad when I was 12 and when we were leaving after the movie ended I remember saying to him “I didn’t really understand what was going on in the movie” and my dad at 52 said “I didn’t understand it either” LOL
One time, this guy handed me a picture of him, he said "Here's a picture of me when I was younger." Every picture is of you when you were younger. -Mitch Hedberg
If I ever can come up with a way to present a picture of me when I am older, I will give you an equal share of the profits. Good call on the obvious that is not obvious to the greater population. 😎👍
When I read the book I kind of hoped that the "Find Robert Langdon" line would turn out to be another anagram, and that he was dragged into the story by mistake. That might have been a neat twist.
@@that-possum-guy3209 prior to hunting tools humans used to hunt by literally running down there prey. Since most if not all animals cant sweat and mostly will die of exhaustion.
@@liquidsleepgames3661 yeah exactly- we can (if not crippled by soft living :p) also out-run basically everything. i used to wonder - before learning this - how humans ever had time to chill out & fiddle with rocks for long enough to figure out how to bang them together...
7:52 actually she's correct, the cryptex is a portable vault used to store small items or information... you're describing a cryptogram/graph which is a table of encrypted text used to decipher the code usually requiring a key word to crack which is called the cipher
What does Moriarty have against Steve Jobs? For anyone who may think I'm mixing things up: The IOU on an apple is from Sherlock's "The Reichenbach Fall", where Moriarty carves it into an apple he's bitten. But the apple the character used has been replaced by Apple's logo, merging 2 very different things. I'm just curious as to why Isobel has those 2 things combined.
You can use Da Vinci as his last name. It was a time before last names and once they came into use many people used places for their last names. That's why people have the last name's London, France, England, and so on and so on. Da Vinci is perfectly reasonable to use as his last name.
"1976 was a year of independence for Portugal"... you wot, mate? 1143 & 1640 are the years of independence and restoration of independence respectively. 1976 was the year in which the new constitution was put into place after the revolution in 1974.
i thinkj the americans are a *tiny* bit obsessed with their constitution (i imagine they - yes ofc i just mean some of 'em - think they are the only people with one.) so maybe that's seen over there as the moment yr properly finished revolting?
I liked the movie more when it was called "The Last Wizard of the Century" and was attempting to cash in on the Tsarist Russia fad that followed Anastasia.
Actually, Madonna of the rocks is the name of the painting located in the Louvre. Virgin of the rocks is another copy that Da Vinci made. It's slightly different and located in England.
Ohhh, CinemaSins. You really weren't paying attention to this movie. I guess 3 hours would do that to anyone. You say the villains drew the symbols on Sauniere when just a few seconds before you say he drew them on himself. You found out the Louvre has 1000 security guards but not that the alarm system would not sound again after Sauniere set it off the first time (the gate that blocked Silas from chasing him).Madonna on the Rocks and Virgin on the Rocks are 2 very similar but different paintings.The Swiss bank arsehole doesn't leave, they escape from him, taking his truck.It is common for the word scotoma to be used metaphorically the way Teabing used it. Love the callback though. I would love to see some of those Tom Hanks/swastika memes! I'd take your performance apart in more detail, but I'm nowhere near as talented as you are at this. Besides, I'd have to subtract several hundred sins because you entertain me so much, so you'd never get sentenced about way. ;) Cheers.
Why would the alarm become deactivated once it was triggered already? The gate isn't down when the police are there so the police must have deactivated the alarm just like CinemaSins said.
@@babyfaec it's all in the novel. Believe it or not, this things are explained thoroughly in the book. Is really so hard to at least listen to the audiobook or read it? More than half the "cinematic sins" are based on the literary sins that Dan Brown wrote in his book.
I personally liked the movie, but honestly found the books to be far better. They do an amazing job of explaining everything and piecing all the tiny details together 0:21 it’s been a while since I read the books but I believe that in the books Landon’s degree was in art history, which is a good basis for symbology, and art history is a very real course considering there were advertisements for that ap class all over my school Also at 2:05 I’m pretty sure it says in the book that he’s afraid of enclosed spaces, not specifically elevators since he almost drowned in a well as a child
When are we gonna get Inferno!👍 I know, bad movie, whatever. Hope everyone is doing as best they can during this time. Much love and respect CinemaSins. You guys inspire me everyday to question and analyze movies. Aka, my Mom dislikes watching almost anything with me now💜
Okay, I'm am one hundred percent sure that DNA testing is entirely useless when attempting to find an individual after like what? like a thousand generations or so?
Also, you can not DNA test just one sample. You need two, so you can compare them and decide on the level of relatives. Do they have an original Jesus slice?
Not quite . DNA has a half-life of approx 521 years. So after 500 years, you can read approx 50% of the coding. After another 520 years, it deteriorates by another 50%. And so on, and so on
I'm not saying that the DNA wouldn't be able to be tested, I'm saying that analysis would be basically worthless after that many generations between the two
So, yes, the Templars totally settled in London in 1185. However, there was a London there long enough ago that there is a proper, known Latin name for it (Londinium) First recorded reference is ~121, with hand written Romen tablets recovered from AD 65/80 including the word “Londinio”… so like… no. This is also why London has a special station in UK government having sovereignty since “time immemorial”
So, like, not only is the comment about settling London not even close to being like Wikipedia, it's like bullshit that your drunk uncle came up with from a conspiracy forum.
***** Of course his books are fiction, but he uses historical facts and twist history to fit his story. And people believe that shit. Hey, are you from Australia? How is the weather there?
He did pretend that a lot of it was accurate, but he got his information from a debunked source. Meaning he bought in to a scam, the whole thing with the secret society and ze grail if I remember correctly. Can't blame him though, he's an author not a historian, he saw an interesting story and wrote a book about it, quite good too in my humble opinion.
+ThatAussieGirl Yeah, i guess he can write whatever he wants. I mean, is not like he's a historian and teach in a college. Here we have a shity spring too, that sucks.
Actually, it's all fiction he has admitted isn't true, and you might as well accuse Tolkien of trying to sell us on Middle-Earth being prehistoric Earth as being true. This book was actually influenced largely in part by The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail, and THAT book actually tries to sell people on its content being factual. Dan Brown isn't telling us this is factual, this is just realistic fiction that people took too seriously. Don't blame the writer for writing a convincing story. You come up with a new and vague twist to religious ideals, and religious nuts will clamor to it.
@@benapeh854 "Da Vinci" is not a name. Surnames did not exist for the majority of the non-nobles at the time. Vinci is his town of origin and "da" means "from". His full name was Leonardo di Ser Piero da Vinci, meaning "Leonardo son of (knight) Piero from Vinci". Calling him "da Vinci" is like calling Lawrence of Arabia "mister of Arabia"
"Frog Kitchen Visor" I friggin' lost it!!! I've been binge watching... you guys have some brilliant gems, but coming up with an anagram for Virgin of the rocks is classic.
I remember watching the trailer before it was out to rent and pointing to Ian McKellan and saying, “Oh he’s the bad guy.” My mother looked at me having read the book and asked me how I knew without a doubt. “Well Tom Hanks is the good guy, he throws something in the air that Gandalf didn’t want thrown in the air and goes running to catch. He’s the bad guy.” Didn’t even have to watch the movie.
4:38 The Fleur de Lis is not only on a bunch of french stuff, it's also in a lot of the UK. It's on part of one of the English flags, most of the old-style ones, and the Queen's flag. This is because at one point England (not the UK, there was a difference) owned a large portion of French territory. They got it back during the seven / hundred years war (I can't remember which.).
Apples used to be smaller and rounder and hang in clusters. Pretty much any produce you see these days has undergone thousands of years of modification by man to be at its most nutritious/ highest yielding quality. Watermelons used to be small, round and almost all rind and seeds, corn used to look like a slightly glorified wheat, yada yada. I know Leonardo was kicking it approx 500 years ago but I bet the apples they were crunching on were probably orb-ish?
Wait what do you mean 1976 was the year of the independence of Portugal. more like 1st of december of 1640. or if you want to talk about liberty from The Dictator Salazar that was in the 25th of April of 1974 I'm going to sin you on this one
chickenpermission you understood what i meant. Salazar, his regime whatever same thing different smell. a quarter sin for you PS. He died a lot sooner than i thought, thought it was around 72/73
You know, despite the general outlook on this film, I rather liked this movie. I actually just saw it a few days ago, didn't even know of the backlash it had received. I can understand people criticizing it for it being convoluted as hell, but other than that, I was entertained.
Great novel - read it - NOVEL, not HISTORICAL TEXT BOOK. Fun story, completely historically inaccurate. Fun movie, not as good as the book. Great EWW as well.
What? The movie is waaaay better than the book, to give you an idea of how awful the book is. And don't give me that "you're not supposed to take it seriously" bullshit; it says in the very beginning of the book that it's supposed to be historical. It's an interesting concept with decent pacing. Aside from that, the writing is stilted, the character (there's only one, just given different roles) are less than one dimensional, the author is condescending, and the prose is on par with my 8th grade fan fiction.
@@DJohnGrady no it doesn't you fuckwit. In the beginning they give you few facts about Opus Dei and priory of Sion and say that the depictions of art work, locations, rituals, buildings and documents are accurate. Nowhere does it claim to be historically accurate.
That dislike must be from someone who thinks: "No way you can fit everything that's wrong with the DaVinci code in fifteen minutes, that video should be at least three days long. Ding!"
Jonathan Moosey October 13, 1307 was, indeed, a Friday. The calendar changed September 3rd/14th, 1752, when Pope Gregory XIII introduced a new more accurate calendar to replace the Julian calendar to fix the fact that Easter was off by 11 days. If you roll back the current Gregorian calendar to October 13, 1307, then it would be Thursday.
It was a Thursday using Gregorian reckoning, which didn't exist at the time. Using the Julian calendar it was a Friday. So the people at the time would have called October 13th, a Friday (or Veneris). /outpedantingthepedant
Although most famous, The Da Vinci Code is Dan Browns least interesting book, probably because the film milked it too much. Read other books by Dan Brown, I find Deception Point and Digital Fortress most interesting.
Only recently found your channel. Absolute. F*cking. Masterpiece. One suggestion though. When you have an instance when multiple sins are required, like "adding 10 sins..." in Davinci Code, find another "Ding" sound that is heavier. Maybe the Gong Show gong sound? Suggestion for your next channel...C-Span! Maybe if it were humored up a little the sheep would understand how they are getting screwed!
How can one movie reviewer be so much smarter that a whole movie? I don't know but you are. This is the best video you've ever made. Even better than those other movies you did so well.
He forgives (insert sin here) if you repent, turn to God, Jesus Christ and his mercy, and sin no more. He doesn’t forgive (insert sin here) if you practice (insert sin here) without remorse, especially when you know the truth of his teachings and ignore them.
@@bbqshome it depends on interpretation, but many interpretations say God doesn't forgive cold blooded murder specifically, killing someone because God tells you to is something you don't even have to ask for forgiveness for, so, if the religious guy thinks it's God telling him to kill, it's gravy.
@@BillyBoyGenius I don't know any sect of Christianity that teaches God doesn't forgive murderers. Moses was a cold-blooded murder. So was David. So was SAINT PAUL.
Actually the point of the star being right side up. And the whole movie if you paid attention. Is that it's a pagan symbol. (Usually that of the religion Wicca) a nature based religion. Focusing on feminine divinity. A topic the movie also explores. And the reason they called in Prof. Langdon is because the police thought it was satanistic, when Robert knew it was a religious symbol for pagan faiths. Not evil, actually one of the most beautiful and meaningful out there. The satanists just stole it from the pagans as the Catholic Church called the polytheists Satan worshippers anyone because they didn't believe in the oneness of God.
Aaaactually, not a "star" but a pentagram is one of common early Christian symbols. Yes, it was also used by pagans, but it is really an universal and simple geometrical shape so it shouldn't be a surprise. In Christian context, it has a complex numerical symbology, representing Jesus (five points, five wounds etc.). That's exactly why Satanists took it and rotated it upside down to use it as their own symbol - because they were supposed to be the negative of the Church.
Maaan i love these videos you are making, even though some of these movies are my favourites, but man i love your commentating and especially your laughter. keep on the good work😊
"Silas, played by Paul, escaping a prison after an earthquake. DO YOU NOT GET IT?!" No. I don't get it. Is that some Biblical reference? What is he trying to say?
In the Bible, Silas and Paul are in prison. As they sing praises to God, an earthquake happens which breaks their bonds and opens the prison doors. This is the reference.
The biggest plot hole of them all, to me, was that thing about the vinegar destroying the paper inside the safe thingy. Easiest way to solve it would be freezing the goddamn thing and breaking it open. Quick and easy.
Actually, Leonardo's last name *was* da Vinci. The name was first noted as a family name in a registry in the early 1300's in Vinci. Leonardo's contemporaries also referred to him as "Vinci" at times - something they would not do if it were not his actual name, as there were quite a few people from Vinci living and working in Florence at the time. The assumption that last names did not exist, or that Leonardo did not have one, is quite ridiculous (and yeah, I am calling out all the historians who claim that, for not doing their research).
Forgot one obvious sin . Sophie's hair at the novel was supposed to be red ( the same as Maria Magdalena ) . At the movie , she's a brunette . This was a very important clue at the original source that Sophie was the secret all along .
I read Da Vinci Code at uni and liked it. Movie was fine but forgettable. Then I watched Angels and Demons and yet again his new ally turns out to be behind it. Surely Langdon would have trust issues by this point but I saw the trailer for Inferno and said 'well, bet that person who appears to be helping him actually has nefarious motives and will betray him at some point'. It's getting formulaic at this point.
Guy Incognito The movies made it seem like the stories are sequential, with Angels and Demons being the sequel, when in actuality Angels and Demons was written first. Both books have the same main character, but are stand alone stories.The events in A&D didn't happen to The Da Vinci Code Robert Langdon, and vice versa.
I was doing so well....then you got to the apple with two butt holes, and I lost it! Then you topped it off with the laugh at the junkie. I love these!
Oh boy, you forgot one of the rules of cinemasins "BOOKS DON'T MATTER!" a movie stands for itself, I shouldn't have to read a book to understand a movie
@@SadlyWaiting Either way you don't have to read the book OR watch the movie to know that Madonna of the rocks and virgin of the rocks are two different paintings
The bad guys didn't draw the star on him? He did it to himself? It's like a gigantic plot point that he leaves all the clues himself as he bleeds out. How did you miss that? It's also not SUPPOSED to be the satanic cross at all, that's the point. There's plenty wrong that's legitimate to criticize without making things up. That or more attention should be paid to the films used for these.
@@erinlorimer7983 That's true but it's in the movie too...you wouldn't have to read the book to know that. It's a huge plot point that gets the whole story going so it isn't left out of the movie unlike other points. It's inexcusable not to know that.
Nuh unh. You do NOT snore and add a sin when Sir Ian McKellen speaks. The rest, that they got wrong, sure... but nothing that man says is boring. He could read the label off a shampoo bottle and it would be great.
To be fair the label of a Shampoo bottle would have probably been more interesting than that
Leedark3 Calm down, butthurt fan.
Are you sure you're not referring to Morgan Freeman?
Gemnist Morgan Freeman makes that list, too. So would Patrick Stewart and Sean Bean. And the late Leonard Nimoy. And James Earl Jones.
Can I add Charles Dance and John Hurt to the list?
It would have been fun if Sophie constantly had little miracles like always finding a parking spot or encountering only green lights whenever she drove in the city happening around her.
That's almost every movie! One of the 50 shades had that when the main character pulled up to the building for an interview and the parking space DIRECTLY in front was available. 😂
it does she cures the druggie she drives the car backwards like she has done that exact route a hundred times and getting through the dump truck and bus. she also has the doves that distract the killer
@@mtblack21 She also (kinda) cured Langdon's phobia with her head massage thingy.
No that's dumb, for you shall not Tempt *Thy Lord your God.....*
That would’ve been extremely silly tho as the whole point of the movie is to show that Jesus may have just been a man
The problem with this movie is that most of its mistakes aren’t present in the books and if they stuck to the books there would be way less mistakes here but then the movie would probably be like 5 hours long
It's not like the book is even slightly accurate, but it would definetly improve
fewer*
I'd prefer if it was. But, then it being based on the book, takes from reading it.
I would honestly still watch it
@@m.m.1301 To be fair Dan Brown does a lot of research for his books. So although the ideas are abstract, the core ideologies are real. Much like House MD; the symptoms and diseases are well exaggerated for entertainment value, but (most) diseases are real.
"I was raised a Catholic" translated to "I'm an atheist, but I feel kinda bad about it."
lexWOLFhale pretty much
Relatable
I think it's closer to "I'm an atheist, but because I was raised Catholic I was taught from a young age that I am corruptible and essentially evil, I and every other human who was ever born has failed God repeatedly despite him loving and accepting us despite said failures, our failures were forgiven before we even committed the failures in the first place, of course we haven't actually done anything to earn that forgiveness, we are just that bad and God is that good, basically guilting us with a debt that we can never repay ever, We all collectively bear the responsibility of Original Sin, humans are so bad our species murdered Jesus when he came selflessly to save us at the cost of his own life and his mother's grief, and I was taught to always feel responsibility, guilt, and shame for all of my imperfections and thought crime the church calls temptation", or for some people, their very identity. I don't believe in God or original sin or that I am saved or anything like that, but I am still glad that I learned shame, because I think being ashamed of yourself is wiser more compassionate and more reflective than being shameless which is ignorant possibly self destructive and very selfish.
😂😂😂
@@Alex-bn3ix Shamelessness is a cornerstone of the new generation, who have no interest in religion at all, even as spectators.
Tom hanks looks 40 in just about everything he is in
This is the most real comment I've ever read.
Its because he drinks adrenochrome!
@@Rymorin4 that wssnt a compliment dumbass, he always looked older, shove that ridiculous conspiracy theory up your ass
Ryan Morin nO
@@Rymorin4 bruh
I actually really like when movies make time to explain backstories and "historical" aspects of the story
For this movie it's more like """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""historical""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
@@Milamberinx some of it's correct. Partially on the Knights Templar and The Witches Hammer. But that's about all of it that I know to be accurate.
@@ReroutedYearAD yeah, sort of. Accurate that those are things that existed.
@@Milamberinx and their purpose. And that the King that commissioned the Knights Templar made charges against them. Unless all I've been able to find on those are incorrect, and there are no records of what they really were for and what happened, yet you somehow know.
The trouble is that about half of it is real and the other half isn't. So then we have to figure out what fake history we just learned.
cinemasins angrily describing the physical appearance and dimensions of an apple is not something i knew i needed until right now
Him describing it makes him much more of and asshole than eating one
Well they misunderstood the reference of apple in "Rosy flesh and seeded womb" line
"This nun leaves this room because a crazy albino dude in a jedi robe basically begs her to"
I mean if Palpatine is asking you to leave a room I probably would
It’s treason then...
6:58 1976 was not a year of independence for Portugal. Either you mixed it up with 1974 the year Portugal overthrew their dictatorship, or 1975 the year a lot of Portuguese colonies became independent (due, in part, to the previous year's revolution). Portugal itself has been independent since 1143.
Pedro Mata obrigado
Pedro Mata that's pretty interesting. thank you for teaching me this :)
thank you, I was going to say that
Não vi o teu comment e disse o mesmo lol Vou apagar o meu :) Damos um Sin ao tipo do Cinema Sins XD
Precisamente!
Literally every Tom Hanks movie is 300x better when you imagine Woody as the main character
It's funny because for Latin America the voice actor that does Tom hanks 99% of the time makes him sound like some sort of Forrest Gump.
Doesn't work for non English speakers :(
you made me pee a little
Cast away becomes a completely different kind of movie
Woody harrelson. Woody boyd Woody allen. Woody guthrie. Woody herman. Woody hayes. Woody r woodenty Woody woodpecker. Woody disney. Woody athink
I lost it at Catholics sometimes forget the difference between wine and blood.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
There's no blood in my wine system, etc.
Catholics can't tell the difference between reality and the delusions of bronze age goat herders.
@@barbyonabike Actually the Catholics don't really hold to the Holy Bible as it's written, they use the Catholic Bible and The Book of Mass. There are a number of differences between them and the Protestant Holy Bible and they do not give the same credence to the shepherds as the Protestants do, which is why they sanctify Mary mother of Jesus as a saint when in Protestantism the worship and sanctification of others other than Jesus is not done and viewed as something the Catholics do to maintain control of their followers.
@@ImpendingJoker Book of mass? lol what? You even capitalized it as "The Book of Mass" That doesn't exist.
Regardless of the historical inaccuracies of the film I found it to be very enjoyable. A film with beautiful scenes of Paris at night, Ian McKellen and Audrey Tatou and also a wonderful soundtrack is always going to be something that I personally would enjoy. I also enjoyed the book and took it for what it is/was..... fiction
Oh but the story of Jesus and Mary have been around for a long time. I have books that was before The Da Vinci Code was made that talks of it. Now I agree this movie is fiction, but majority of the stuff said is true
@@devonchapman3932 Wow. Please tell me that was sarcasm.
Almost nothing in the story was true.
@@colinwillis9096 nope.
Now Paris is a sh#t hole
"...that's rude to the people who waited in line to show him their pictures of corpses."
Win
Clouseau? "That's racist"
@@Diotallevi73 uuuuuu
Honestly the albino religious guy is my favourite character in this entire movie. Like everyone is just full of bullshit and inconveniences and thia guy is just straight up crazy with religion and killing people. Like yeah he's not a good man but whatever. He was at least INTERESTING
So you think the rest wasn’t?
What's the name of his movie looks way better
Just read the book
@@praisethelordgriffith8338 Yep, the book is waaaay better. Even though that is longer than the movie, I loved it so much.
Because the longer it is the more scenes and awesome stuff that's happening unlike in the movie where they cut things short.
You mean Kevin Hart?
8:50 Aw man! They dragged poor Ian Mckellen into this shit didn't they?
Thankyou for saving me the effort of making this point.
DING
And Alfred Molina. : ( He was Doc Ock man, he's too good to be in this garbage movie.
That's OK because X-Men: Last Stand came out the same year, so I don't think he was too worried about this film tarnishing his image.
Good one!
Lost my shit at “BAD nun-killing albino... Bad nun-killing albino...” 😂😂
wait i'm lost, was the albino bad, or the nun?
/jk
The "last orgy" bit even better😅
The first thing I thought when I saw this movie was: "Well, CinemaSins would sin the hell out of that pigeon"
That's because Cinema Sins took his FACE... ... *OFF*!
Seriously, I was expecting a John Woo joke.
"sin the hell out of that pigeon"
It's a church pigeon, pretty sure it doesn't have a lot of hell left in it.
I'm quite sure that was a dove? Cause religious imagery.
TsukiNaito1
Hey! You there, with the logic? Yea, knock that shit off, this is CinemaSins, logic doesn't apply here.
... Jesus of... Camelot?
What the actual fuck even is this?
"Had come along."
"We dine well here in Camelot.
We eat ham and jam and spam a lot!"
Oops, wrong movie
Oh, a friend of mine is a History professor and every term one or more of his medieval history students ALWAYS ask if Jesus took part in the Crusades to liberate Jerusalem. Guess they're the same kind of people who wrote this movie's script (I detest all things conspiracy theory, thence intensely dislike this movie. This, however, is no comment on the people who like it).
tis a silly place
I don't know if we can really blame the people who wrote the script or Dan Brown himself for this. It's a work of fiction, afterall, and they are free to do whatever they want as long as the plot and the world they are creating is coherent.
The problem comes with people who really think this kind of theories are real. I studied Philology and I was taught that, when analyzing a book or other works of art, the first thing to do is always to try to understand the historical context in which the book/painting... was created. It's important to know the author and, above all, to know that many of the things the authors put in their works weren't obscure for their audience (a good example is Dante. We don't know many references in Divina Commedia, but we are sure Dante knew the audience of his time understood perfectly what he meant). This means that seeing obscure symbols everywhere (in a Robert Langdon way) isn't exactly the correct way to analyze something, because often we tend to give to certain things meanings according to our context Once we had a lecture with an expert od Da Vinci's works, and he said he was sad to see people watch "L'ultima cena", see some kind of triangle somewhere and say that what Da Vinci wanted to tell was the untold story of Jesus. He said that by doing this these people missed the point.
So, I don't think "The Da Vinci Code" is guilty of something. Personally I didn't like the book, but I understand its purpose. Like you, I can't stand people who see conspirancies everywhere, but I don't blame someone because he/she enjoyed a book.
I watched this movie so many times, yet I have no memory of the albino earthquake flashback.
They sinned the extended edition, not the one released to cinemas. That also explains the whole '3 hours long' gripe - the actual cut is 2h20 mins
Naomi Bousson saaaaame #MandelaEffect?
Naomi Bousson oh wait, never mind, I just read that other guy's reply 😂😂
It's in the extended version.
i don’t remember the earthquake being in the book either...
I remember going to see this movie with my dad when I was 12 and when we were leaving after the movie ended I remember saying to him “I didn’t really understand what was going on in the movie” and my dad at 52 said “I didn’t understand it either” LOL
One time, this guy handed me a picture of him, he said "Here's a picture of me when I was younger." Every picture is of you when you were younger. -Mitch Hedberg
"I'm against picketing, but i don't know how to show it." God, I love Mitch Hedburg.
My friend asked me if I wanted a frozen banana, I said no. But I wanted a regular one later on..so...yes.
If I ever can come up with a way to present a picture of me when I am older, I will give you an equal share of the profits. Good call on the obvious that is not obvious to the greater population. 😎👍
Rice is great when you're hungry and you want 2000 of something.
I used to do drugs. I still do, but I used to, too.
When I read the book I kind of hoped that the "Find Robert Langdon" line would turn out to be another anagram, and that he was dragged into the story by mistake. That might have been a neat twist.
"'Brisk walker will always catch up to someone running for their life' cliché"
How has this not appeared in every horror movie video?
That's not even a cliché, technically it's true. Humans can walk for a lot longer than they (or pretty much any other animal) can run.
@@that-possum-guy3209 prior to hunting tools humans used to hunt by literally running down there prey. Since most if not all animals cant sweat and mostly will die of exhaustion.
@@liquidsleepgames3661 yeah exactly- we can (if not crippled by soft living :p) also out-run basically everything.
i used to wonder - before learning this - how humans ever had time to chill out & fiddle with rocks for long enough to figure out how to bang them together...
7:52 actually she's correct, the cryptex is a portable vault used to store small items or information... you're describing a cryptogram/graph which is a table of encrypted text used to decipher the code usually requiring a key word to crack which is called the cipher
died laughing at your description of an apple X'D
Ironic due to your avatar
2 buttholes!
What does Moriarty have against Steve Jobs?
For anyone who may think I'm mixing things up:
The IOU on an apple is from Sherlock's "The Reichenbach Fall", where Moriarty carves it into an apple he's bitten. But the apple the character used has been replaced by Apple's logo, merging 2 very different things. I'm just curious as to why Isobel has those 2 things combined.
aleix1203 omg i didn't even think hahaha xD
Isobel Eppen IS IT BECAUSE UR AN APPLE, YOU APPLE.
I actually liked very much this whole history background they gave in the movie. It was very interesting and not boring at all to me.
Yeeeeesss you've done this, I love this channel!
6:26 why am I so in love with the way you laugh?
So if she's the holy grail... does that mean that seven mages will summon seven servants to fight over her to get a wish granted?
Dominic Uccelli wow, fate reference in a non anime video
christian lopez couldn't help myself. The setup was right there.
Fight me!
She's Irisviel then?
Jedy Zichterman Exactly
So it took me 15 years of living on this earth to realize Da Vinci wasn’t his last name but a title... ok
Dude he was born in Vinci, a small town in tuscany
Leonardo from Vinci..
I honestly don`t think anyone expect a 15 year old to know that, most adults don`t, so..
@@m.m.1301 Kaamilah is a girl`s name breh ;)
@@afrog2666 my bad
You can use Da Vinci as his last name. It was a time before last names and once they came into use many people used places for their last names. That's why people have the last name's London, France, England, and so on and so on. Da Vinci is perfectly reasonable to use as his last name.
"No women, no kids" LEEONNN!!!!!!
Now that was a good movie.
Rob Mckennie yay
Too soon... :(
NinjaBunni13 too soon? who died?
Quite sexist policy actually
"1976 was a year of independence for Portugal"...
you wot, mate?
1143 & 1640 are the years of independence and restoration of independence respectively.
1976 was the year in which the new constitution was put into place after the revolution in 1974.
I was looking for this
@@portugal4everybody bring back Salazar
i thinkj the americans are a *tiny* bit obsessed with their constitution (i imagine they - yes ofc i just mean some of 'em - think they are the only people with one.) so maybe that's seen over there as the moment yr properly finished revolting?
I enjoyed the book more but also liked the movie when I saw it.
I have 3 balls and 7 dicks
wow you are amazing
I liked the movie more when it was called "The Last Wizard of the Century" and was attempting to cash in on the Tsarist Russia fad that followed Anastasia.
Wow, last time I was this early...
This was still a good meme.
this was always a bad meme
I guess you have never been this early before.
Beethoven With A Shotgun The last time i was this early this wasnt a bad meme is a bad meme on itself now
Just because you acknowledge it's not a good meme doesn't make it a good meme
Sorry guys, but Portugal didn't become independent in 1976... What happened was a political revolution in 1974. Portugal is independent since 1143
Sai já uma revolução aqui na comment section xD
Yep!!
Nerd hero!
I think he meant democratic since it was mainly monarchy and dictatorship until 1975...
@@leprinceconstant1985 well, we now know, right Sweetheart?
Actually, Madonna of the rocks is the name of the painting located in the Louvre. Virgin of the rocks is another copy that Da Vinci made. It's slightly different and located in England.
Ohhh, CinemaSins. You really weren't paying attention to this movie. I guess 3 hours would do that to anyone.
You say the villains drew the symbols on Sauniere when just a few seconds before you say he drew them on himself.
You found out the Louvre has 1000 security guards but not that the alarm system would not sound again after Sauniere set it off the first time (the gate that blocked Silas from chasing him).Madonna on the Rocks and Virgin on the Rocks are 2 very similar but different paintings.The Swiss bank arsehole doesn't leave, they escape from him, taking his truck.It is common for the word scotoma to be used metaphorically the way Teabing used it. Love the callback though.
I would love to see some of those Tom Hanks/swastika memes!
I'd take your performance apart in more detail, but I'm nowhere near as talented as you are at this. Besides, I'd have to subtract several hundred sins because you entertain me so much, so you'd never get sentenced about way. ;) Cheers.
I think the Tom hanks swatstika scene will be a meme at some point, just like Shaggy.
Why would the alarm become deactivated once it was triggered already? The gate isn't down when the police are there so the police must have deactivated the alarm just like CinemaSins said.
Another triggered fanboy *ding*
@@babyfaec it's all in the novel. Believe it or not, this things are explained thoroughly in the book. Is really so hard to at least listen to the audiobook or read it? More than half the "cinematic sins" are based on the literary sins that Dan Brown wrote in his book.
Rodolfo Lomelí G yee boi the novel was the best
I swear to God the book is good you guys.
it's a pitty the movies are so poor
chubkuriboh So true.
No, it's really not lol
JHowesitgoing123 how is it not?
ThatAussieGirl So true.
British Guy = Villan!!!?
Konst Saalfeld yes we are cunts who will be evil for anything
Human Interaction I know.... I am German.... Was deutsche!? NAZI! That is my life... evan thought we took over 1 Million refugees!
Konst Saalfeld American=Shocked
I DID NOT SEE THIS COMING!
The Brits and Germans will forever be the villains because they're the ones that can handle it without throwing a shit fit about racism.
Folopolis Yeahh being the villain for ever is probably What happens when you start Conquer whole Continents and kill a lot of those people...
I personally liked the movie, but honestly found the books to be far better. They do an amazing job of explaining everything and piecing all the tiny details together
0:21 it’s been a while since I read the books but I believe that in the books Landon’s degree was in art history, which is a good basis for symbology, and art history is a very real course considering there were advertisements for that ap class all over my school
Also at 2:05 I’m pretty sure it says in the book that he’s afraid of enclosed spaces, not specifically elevators since he almost drowned in a well as a child
“This movie’s original title was Literally Three Hours of Exposition” gets me every time
EWW Angels and Demons for Thursday; calling it now.
Woah! _No shit._
he may do one of the national treasure movies to throw us off... they are ridiculously similar
14:20
They've already done them both
Michael Duntz Christmas
"the last orgy" got me off guard and i can't stop laughing when i need to sleep and get up for work tomorrow
When are we gonna get Inferno!👍
I know, bad movie, whatever.
Hope everyone is doing as best they can during this time. Much love and respect CinemaSins. You guys inspire me everyday to question and analyze movies. Aka, my Mom dislikes watching almost anything with me now💜
Music : -14 sins.
Chevaliers de Sangreal is out of this world!
-13!
one for each and every apostle
Hans builds our world !
*Ding!*
Anty Party there were only 12 apostles
"APPLE 'That spells asshole'" - Cinema Sins
Okay, I'm am one hundred percent sure that DNA testing is entirely useless when attempting to find an individual after like what? like a thousand generations or so?
Also, you can not DNA test just one sample. You need two, so you can compare them and decide on the level of relatives. Do they have an original Jesus slice?
Not quite . DNA has a half-life of approx 521 years. So after 500 years, you can read approx 50% of the coding. After another 520 years, it deteriorates by another 50%. And so on, and so on
I'm not saying that the DNA wouldn't be able to be tested, I'm saying that analysis would be basically worthless after that many generations between the two
RotatingMagnetGuy
I was agreeing with you
A thousand generations? In 2000 years? more like 70...
God dude please keeping making these things I have been laughing because of them for the last two days.
So, yes, the Templars totally settled in London in 1185. However, there was a London there long enough ago that there is a proper, known Latin name for it (Londinium) First recorded reference is ~121, with hand written Romen tablets recovered from AD 65/80 including the word “Londinio”… so like… no.
This is also why London has a special station in UK government having sovereignty since “time immemorial”
So, like, not only is the comment about settling London not even close to being like Wikipedia, it's like bullshit that your drunk uncle came up with from a conspiracy forum.
The worst part of this movie is that some people believe is based on real history. I believe Dan Brown never read a history book in his life.
***** Of course his books are fiction, but he uses historical facts and twist history to fit his story. And people believe that shit. Hey, are you from Australia? How is the weather there?
He did pretend that a lot of it was accurate, but he got his information from a debunked source.
Meaning he bought in to a scam, the whole thing with the secret society and ze grail if I remember correctly.
Can't blame him though, he's an author not a historian, he saw an interesting story and wrote a book about it, quite good too in my humble opinion.
+ThatAussieGirl Yeah, i guess he can write whatever he wants. I mean, is not like he's a historian and teach in a college. Here we have a shity spring too, that sucks.
Actually, it's all fiction he has admitted isn't true, and you might as well accuse Tolkien of trying to sell us on Middle-Earth being prehistoric Earth as being true.
This book was actually influenced largely in part by The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail, and THAT book actually tries to sell people on its content being factual.
Dan Brown isn't telling us this is factual, this is just realistic fiction that people took too seriously. Don't blame the writer for writing a convincing story. You come up with a new and vague twist to religious ideals, and religious nuts will clamor to it.
The movie is not very "realistic" fiction.
Transformers: The Movie turns 30 this year, can you please do, Everything Wrong With Transformers: The Movie?
Masteroftheweb if you watch the movies backwards you can see a bunch of robots building a City together xD
I'm assuming you're talking about Bayformers... cause even backwards, most of the movie takes place outside of a city.
YOU'VE GOT THE TOUCH!
You had so many good quips in this one, I was actually laughing out loud
3:33 Well that's kind of the point. It wasn't meant as the satanic symbol.
Anyway, the bad guy didn't paint it, he did, with his own blood, so he was looking down on it, not up.
Also the symbol has nothing to do with Satan, upside down or otherwise
Thank you so much for the "calling him da Vinci" sin. I've been trying to explain that to people for like three years
Could you elaborate?
@@benapeh854 "Da Vinci" is not a name. Surnames did not exist for the majority of the non-nobles at the time. Vinci is his town of origin and "da" means "from". His full name was Leonardo di Ser Piero da Vinci, meaning "Leonardo son of (knight) Piero from Vinci". Calling him "da Vinci" is like calling Lawrence of Arabia "mister of Arabia"
@@m.m.1301 Thanks for the info
"Frog Kitchen Visor" I friggin' lost it!!! I've been binge watching... you guys have some brilliant gems, but coming up with an anagram for Virgin of the rocks is classic.
I remember watching the trailer before it was out to rent and pointing to Ian McKellan and saying, “Oh he’s the bad guy.” My mother looked at me having read the book and asked me how I knew without a doubt. “Well Tom Hanks is the good guy, he throws something in the air that Gandalf didn’t want thrown in the air and goes running to catch. He’s the bad guy.” Didn’t even have to watch the movie.
4:38 The Fleur de Lis is not only on a bunch of french stuff, it's also in a lot of the UK. It's on part of one of the English flags, most of the old-style ones, and the Queen's flag. This is because at one point England (not the UK, there was a difference) owned a large portion of French territory. They got it back during the seven / hundred years war (I can't remember which.).
it even is the symbol of my university here in mexico
"Julian Assange: Origins" almost made me laugh Grape Cush out of my nose! well done!
😁😁😁 “Julian Assange: Origins” (in a deep voice) ONLY ON FOX
I love watching this movie. I own the theatrical and extended editions. I also have a cryptex and Langdon's journal.
Apples used to be smaller and rounder and hang in clusters. Pretty much any produce you see these days has undergone thousands of years of modification by man to be at its most nutritious/ highest yielding quality. Watermelons used to be small, round and almost all rind and seeds, corn used to look like a slightly glorified wheat, yada yada. I know Leonardo was kicking it approx 500 years ago but I bet the apples they were crunching on were probably orb-ish?
Wait what do you mean 1976 was the year of the independence of Portugal. more like 1st of december of 1640. or if you want to talk about liberty from The Dictator Salazar that was in the 25th of April of 1974
I'm going to sin you on this one
salazar died before that. liberty from the dictartorship of the new state was in that date.
half a sin for you too :b
*ding*
chickenpermission you understood what i meant. Salazar, his regime whatever same thing different smell.
a quarter sin for you
PS. He died a lot sooner than i thought, thought it was around 72/73
1640 was the year of the Restauration of Independence. 1143 was the year of Independence (according with most historians). Abraço.
anty, Two against one. Reread your history book.
scrolled way too far to find this comment...
You know, despite the general outlook on this film, I rather liked this movie. I actually just saw it a few days ago, didn't even know of the backlash it had received. I can understand people criticizing it for it being convoluted as hell, but other than that, I was entertained.
Great novel - read it - NOVEL, not HISTORICAL TEXT BOOK. Fun story, completely historically inaccurate.
Fun movie, not as good as the book.
Great EWW as well.
I read the novel. I regret taking it seriously for a single moment.
Then that's your mistake. You weren't meant to take it seriously. It's a NOVEL.
What? The movie is waaaay better than the book, to give you an idea of how awful the book is. And don't give me that "you're not supposed to take it seriously" bullshit; it says in the very beginning of the book that it's supposed to be historical.
It's an interesting concept with decent pacing. Aside from that, the writing is stilted, the character (there's only one, just given different roles) are less than one dimensional, the author is condescending, and the prose is on par with my 8th grade fan fiction.
D. John Grady no it doesn’t.
@@DJohnGrady no it doesn't you fuckwit. In the beginning they give you few facts about Opus Dei and priory of Sion and say that the depictions of art work, locations, rituals, buildings and documents are accurate. Nowhere does it claim to be historically accurate.
3:33 The evil dudes didn’t touch him the guy did it to himself, the cop literally said this at the signing
"That is wine, not blood. I know you Catholics have a hard time telling which one is which sometimes." So savage....
Fifteen minute video. Uploaded one minute ago. One dislike already. Watch the god damn video first!
Some people subscribe to a channel just to dislike every video
7 minutes now and 4 dislikes
That dislike must be from someone who thinks: "No way you can fit everything that's wrong with the DaVinci code in fifteen minutes, that video should be at least three days long. Ding!"
lovelorn 15 minutes 10 dislikes
Who actually gives a rat's ass?
"Deus ex Machina, like, maybe for real this time" lmfao. Well played, sir. I'm glad that opportunity arrived.
This has to be one of the best CinemaSins reviews lol
October 13, 1307 was a Thursday.
Jonathan Moosey October 13, 1307 was, indeed, a Friday. The calendar changed September 3rd/14th, 1752, when Pope Gregory XIII introduced a new more accurate calendar to replace the Julian calendar to fix the fact that Easter was off by 11 days. If you roll back the current Gregorian calendar to October 13, 1307, then it would be Thursday.
It was a Thursday using Gregorian reckoning, which didn't exist at the time. Using the Julian calendar it was a Friday. So the people at the time would have called October 13th, a Friday (or Veneris). /outpedantingthepedant
David Romig By 1752 Gregory XIII was long dead. He published the bull "inter gravissimas" that introduced the calendar reform in 1582.
But for me.....it was Tuesday.
Ronnie Derrell Yeah. I'll be honest I haven't seen the movie, but I really like the quote.
Has there been a cinema sins of Fury? We need a cinema sins of Fury.
Oh No I mean, that does depend where the shell hits. Side of the turret at a sharp angle? Sure. Front plate? Not so likely.
Also, Kung Fury.
that video would take longer than the average life span
Gun shots looking like lasers drives me crazy in that movie.
Why is the joke at 12:30 the only one that made me giggle? God, I'm such a child lmao
Alannah xD
Who makes a Baby Jessica joke in 2016?! Love it! One million likes! Keep doing what you’re doing.
Just finished the book (meh, overall) and am very thankful for CS' sufferings that I don't have to endure the movie. Exposition City!
Although most famous, The Da Vinci Code is Dan Browns least interesting book, probably because the film milked it too much. Read other books by Dan Brown, I find Deception Point and Digital Fortress most interesting.
And, if you want to read the book, literally EVERY thrift store has at least one copy. I have not been to a thrift store that doesn't.
"Oh man, they dragged Sir Ian McKellen into this shit!" Ding.
It takes a sir to perform a sir.
Only recently found your channel. Absolute. F*cking. Masterpiece. One suggestion though. When you have an instance when multiple sins are required, like "adding 10 sins..." in Davinci Code, find another "Ding" sound that is heavier. Maybe the Gong Show gong sound? Suggestion for your next channel...C-Span! Maybe if it were humored up a little the sheep would understand how they are getting screwed!
How can one movie reviewer be so much smarter that a whole movie? I don't know but you are. This is the best video you've ever made. Even better than those other movies you did so well.
"Your God does not forgive murderers. - Actually, he does, sorry." Lol :D
Doesn't he?
Clearly never read the Bible
He forgives (insert sin here) if you repent, turn to God, Jesus Christ and his mercy, and sin no more. He doesn’t forgive (insert sin here) if you practice (insert sin here) without remorse, especially when you know the truth of his teachings and ignore them.
@@bbqshome it depends on interpretation, but many interpretations say God doesn't forgive cold blooded murder specifically, killing someone because God tells you to is something you don't even have to ask for forgiveness for, so, if the religious guy thinks it's God telling him to kill, it's gravy.
@@BillyBoyGenius I don't know any sect of Christianity that teaches God doesn't forgive murderers.
Moses was a cold-blooded murder. So was David. So was SAINT PAUL.
Actually the point of the star being right side up. And the whole movie if you paid attention. Is that it's a pagan symbol. (Usually that of the religion Wicca) a nature based religion. Focusing on feminine divinity. A topic the movie also explores. And the reason they called in Prof. Langdon is because the police thought it was satanistic, when Robert knew it was a religious symbol for pagan faiths. Not evil, actually one of the most beautiful and meaningful out there. The satanists just stole it from the pagans as the Catholic Church called the polytheists Satan worshippers anyone because they didn't believe in the oneness of God.
Aaaactually, not a "star" but a pentagram is one of common early Christian symbols. Yes, it was also used by pagans, but it is really an universal and simple geometrical shape so it shouldn't be a surprise. In Christian context, it has a complex numerical symbology, representing Jesus (five points, five wounds etc.). That's exactly why Satanists took it and rotated it upside down to use it as their own symbol - because they were supposed to be the negative of the Church.
Maaan i love these videos you are making, even though some of these movies are my favourites, but man i love your commentating and especially your laughter. keep on the good work😊
"Silas, played by Paul, escaping a prison after an earthquake. DO YOU NOT GET IT?!"
No. I don't get it. Is that some Biblical reference? What is he trying to say?
In the Bible, Silas and Paul are in prison. As they sing praises to God, an earthquake happens which breaks their bonds and opens the prison doors. This is the reference.
Also, Silas is played by English actor Paul Bettany.
@@KyleVellacottFord1st Oh, thank you.
you guy should do BeetleJuice next! :D
juice beetles
I feel it would be a short video but still might be good
The biggest plot hole of them all, to me, was that thing about the vinegar destroying the paper inside the safe thingy. Easiest way to solve it would be freezing the goddamn thing and breaking it open. Quick and easy.
Actually, Leonardo's last name *was* da Vinci. The name was first noted as a family name in a registry in the early 1300's in Vinci. Leonardo's contemporaries also referred to him as "Vinci" at times - something they would not do if it were not his actual name, as there were quite a few people from Vinci living and working in Florence at the time. The assumption that last names did not exist, or that Leonardo did not have one, is quite ridiculous (and yeah, I am calling out all the historians who claim that, for not doing their research).
Forgot one obvious sin . Sophie's hair at the novel was supposed to be red ( the same as Maria Magdalena ) . At the movie , she's a brunette . This was a very important clue at the original source that Sophie was the secret all along .
8:57 - "Aww, they dragged poor Sir Ian McKellen into this, didn't they?"
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that in Inferno, Tom Hanks is betrayed by the character he trusts the most.
The whole book (haven't seen the movie) is a flimsy staged failure of suspense. Dan Brown got me fucked up
Guy Incognito I read DaVinci Code and Angel's and Demons, and loved them both. I couldn't get through Inferno, it was awful.
The ending sucks soooo much, in that piece of shit movie
I read Da Vinci Code at uni and liked it. Movie was fine but forgettable. Then I watched Angels and Demons and yet again his new ally turns out to be behind it. Surely Langdon would have trust issues by this point but I saw the trailer for Inferno and said 'well, bet that person who appears to be helping him actually has nefarious motives and will betray him at some point'. It's getting formulaic at this point.
Guy Incognito The movies made it seem like the stories are sequential, with Angels and Demons being the sequel, when in actuality Angels and Demons was written first. Both books have the same main character, but are stand alone stories.The events in A&D didn't happen to The Da Vinci Code Robert Langdon, and vice versa.
I was doing so well....then you got to the apple with two butt holes, and I lost it! Then you topped it off with the laugh at the junkie. I love these!
0:04 should not it be Da Vinci, instead of Davinci?
And he also wrote Di vinci. Jeez
giorgi dvalidze it's "the Vinci"
It's actually de_vinci
The actual name is Leonardo Da Vinci.
Source: I'm italian.
giorgi dvalidze
Actually they have put DaVinci. They capitalised the "v"
Some of them were not mistakes. They are explained in the book but obviously didn't make it in the movie!
Oh boy, you forgot one of the rules of cinemasins "BOOKS DON'T MATTER!" a movie stands for itself, I shouldn't have to read a book to understand a movie
@@SadlyWaiting, Preach!
@@SadlyWaiting Either way you don't have to read the book OR watch the movie to know that Madonna of the rocks and virgin of the rocks are two different paintings
16 mins summed up. "This movie is 50% bullshit, 30% inaccurate history, and 20% theology.
155 sins
+Titans Bane why does it having accurate history matter when it is a fictional story
***** I was just summing up what cinemasins said. No need to try and force a debate here.
Titans Bane that's 110%...
Tony Montelino 50+30+20? thats 100...genius
I love the insertion of Rage Against the Machine at the end. F*cking (in keeping with the subtitles of the video...lol) epic!!!
Why not an old classic and do a Monty Python and the Holy Grail?
That would be like a five second video though.
Do it for an April Fool's video then.
ForgettableNPC Does Cinemasins do April Fool's specials?
That would be more appropriate for Cinema Wins.
Thought he doesn't do comedies on principal
What is your quest? To seek the holy grail!
What is the average wingspan of a sparrow? African, or European?
What about the air speed velocity of an unladen one?
I don't know that!
You should have Ian McKellen said "you shall not pass" at the Intercom
This is the funniest CinemaSins yet. Couldn't stop laughing.
The bad guys didn't draw the star on him? He did it to himself? It's like a gigantic plot point that he leaves all the clues himself as he bleeds out. How did you miss that? It's also not SUPPOSED to be the satanic cross at all, that's the point. There's plenty wrong that's legitimate to criticize without making things up. That or more attention should be paid to the films used for these.
U it is
Wow, it's almost as if the presenter didn't read the book first for reference...
@@erinlorimer7983 That's true but it's in the movie too...you wouldn't have to read the book to know that. It's a huge plot point that gets the whole story going so it isn't left out of the movie unlike other points. It's inexcusable not to know that.
I definitely think 15 sins should come off for Sir Ian Mckellan. Such an international treasure.
The french swearing was beep'ed out, that was somehow hilarious to me
Why?
The Da Vinci Code and National Treasure are movies I said I'd watch but never got around to it. Cinema Sins definitely saved me some time.
Kerra Johnson it’s actually pretty good. I’m still waiting for the second one