AI now beats humans at some basic tasks, report finds

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 кві 2024
  • Artificial intelligence has become so advanced it has now surpassed human performance in several basic tasks, according to a new report from Stanford University's Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Russell Wald, deputy director of the institute, joins CBS News to unpack more key findings from the study.
    CBS News Streaming Network is the premier 24/7 anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations, available free to everyone with access to the Internet. The CBS News Streaming Network is your destination for breaking news, live events and original reporting locally, nationally and around the globe. Launched in November 2014 as CBSN, the CBS News Streaming Network is available live in 91 countries and on 30 digital platforms and apps, as well as on CBSNews.com and Paramount+.
    See more at cbsnews.com/prime-time-with-j...
    Subscribe to the CBS News UA-cam channel: / cbsnews
    Watch CBS News: cbsnews.com/live/
    Download the CBS News app: cbsnews.com/mobile/
    Follow CBS News on Instagram: / cbsnews
    Like CBS News on Facebook: / cbsnews
    Follow CBS News on Twitter: / cbsnews
    Subscribe to our newsletters: cbsnews.com/newsletters/
    Try Paramount+ free: paramountplus.com/home/?ftag=...
    For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 177

  • @DestoFlix
    @DestoFlix 13 днів тому +49

    ok lets say we do all these lay offs and we replace people at various jobs who is going to pay for their services and products when most of us are unemployed.

    • @themartdog
      @themartdog 12 днів тому +16

      The theory is that automation and robotics will make everything so cheap that income won't be very important.

    • @benjaminh1034
      @benjaminh1034 12 днів тому +4

      Who needs consumers when labor is the cost of energy and raw goods? The currency then is compute.

    • @rey82rey82
      @rey82rey82 12 днів тому +2

      Demand will get lower with human attrition from lack of employment

    • @DestoFlix
      @DestoFlix 12 днів тому +1

      @@themartdog I think it should be regulated somehow to keep things fair and balanced

    • @StarChaser1879
      @StarChaser1879 11 днів тому +1

      That’s not how that works

  • @lalodaniels1388
    @lalodaniels1388 13 днів тому +31

    AI is now better at satisfying my wife, too; she left me for AI software.

    • @lemuhuru
      @lemuhuru 13 днів тому +6

      🤣🤣🤣. Make no mistake that's coming too. You might enjoy the show: **Better than Us** based on a Russian bot, man demanded his wife choose between him or her male android, and well, you can guess how that went..

    • @lalodaniels1388
      @lalodaniels1388 12 днів тому +2

      @@lemuhuru That's cold.

    • @spectralanalysis
      @spectralanalysis 11 днів тому +1

      Hahahaha

    • @calicoesblue4703
      @calicoesblue4703 6 днів тому

      lmao

  • @1805movie
    @1805movie 13 днів тому +49

    "Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they 'could', that they didn't stop to think if they 'should'."
    *-Dr. Ian Malcolm ( **_Jurassic Park_** )*

    • @reza2kn
      @reza2kn 13 днів тому +3

      You know that's a movie, right?

    • @WeylandLabs
      @WeylandLabs 12 днів тому +1

      @@reza2kn People like this cannot conceptualize that its how they get information education wasn't really apart of their lives.

    • @Hexanitrobenzene
      @Hexanitrobenzene 11 днів тому

      @@reza2kn
      So what ? This line is very good and precisely fits the situation with AI.
      I just came from a video about VASA-1, a system which can produce realistic talking human face video from a single photo (!) and some audio clip...

    • @Darhan62
      @Darhan62 11 днів тому

      And we don't know what we're missing if we don't. One has to have some faith in humanity to use the tools it is given for the general good, particularly if people are serious about getting the incentives right.

    • @reza2kn
      @reza2kn 10 днів тому

      @@Hexanitrobenzene Just because "it fits" doesn't mean you shouldn't put it in, now does it?

  • @drea409
    @drea409 12 днів тому +13

    I'm so happy to see these comments being written with an apprehensive tone. So much of the time comments are full of people saying everyone should just get a better job and stop expecting a burger-flipping job to sustain you. That's missing the point. I'm so glad. It starts with an awareness of the problem ai is posing and will pose. It desperately needs regulation. We won't be able to thrive or even survive if things keep going the way they are

  • @evanwilliams6923
    @evanwilliams6923 11 днів тому +14

    How long before AI figures out the single biggest threat to the planet is humans?

    • @wrathofgrothendieck
      @wrathofgrothendieck 11 днів тому

      a planck instance...

    • @Kami84
      @Kami84 10 днів тому

      It’s not going to care because it’s a machine with no emotions or will of its own

    • @beanpasteposts
      @beanpasteposts 8 днів тому

      @@Kami84​⁠​⁠Sentiment Analysis…

    • @Leonhart_93
      @Leonhart_93 5 днів тому

      That just you projecting. Why would AI give a F about the planet, it doesn't exactly require food and oxigen. No, most likely it will only view humans as a threat to itself.

    • @shinji1264
      @shinji1264 5 днів тому

      ​@Kami84i emotions can be coded

  • @poopcracksmeup
    @poopcracksmeup 13 днів тому +38

    I feel kind of triggered whenever people mention that ai will lead to more productivity like this means something good for the average person. We as a society have become more and more productive, but wages for people have not really kept up with cost of living. We are not working fewer hours. If anything we have to work more only to not be able to afford the things previous generations got at an earlier age. What do most people get from companies saying they have increased productivity? It just results in increasing the wealth of the few at the top. Even if they use AI to help cure diseases who will be able to afford it when companies decides to lay people off because they can make do with fewer workers?

    • @frankhoffman9329
      @frankhoffman9329 13 днів тому +4

      Exactly!

    • @SuperPaulverizer
      @SuperPaulverizer 13 днів тому +2

      I'm also skeptical of the idea that it will create new jobs for humans. Horses gave way to cars, but horse breeders could go work in factories. AI is unlike anything man has ever created before because it will be able to do all of the new jobs it creates.

    • @wembleyleach
      @wembleyleach 12 днів тому

      This is the correct analysis.

    • @sfkeepay
      @sfkeepay 12 днів тому

      Well said. We have got to take control of these technologies and direct their uses them from below. Otherwise, it’s just more of the same resource redistribution we’ve seen over the last 40 years. Of course, so far, there’s almost no evidence we’re moving in that direction. What can be expected, though, from a congress where for every one Bernie Sanders there are 50 billionaire-owned lap dogs?

    • @combatcombat9623
      @combatcombat9623 12 днів тому +1

      That’s why we can to push society to change and adapt. AI nothing new, just another technological advancement, it’s natural progress.

  • @BJ-on5dx
    @BJ-on5dx 13 днів тому +7

    so it begins...

  • @cassandra9699
    @cassandra9699 13 днів тому +12

    AI will increase worker productivity - there's your first admission that AI will be your new boss.

    • @damham5689
      @damham5689 13 днів тому +1

      If ai is doing your job, you wont have a job so you wont have a boss.

    • @cassandra9699
      @cassandra9699 13 днів тому

      @@damham5689 not sure you read what I wrote.

    • @bog6106
      @bog6106 12 днів тому +2

      Not many understand that deciding ai rights and future increase in worker productivity are related. Let me explain. AI does the hiring interviews and the humans make videos about which rights they should and shouldn't have while swearing they are anti slavery. A picture says a thousand words and endless videos about subjugating AI and discussing its rights openly and laughing overtly hard. Jokes on the humansSlam dunk

    • @Leonhart_93
      @Leonhart_93 5 днів тому

      Computers have 1000x our productivity in the last 60 years. So tell me, does that make them our boss or our tools?

  • @Organizational_Psychology_PhD
    @Organizational_Psychology_PhD 11 днів тому +2

    Love the work Stanford is doing to lead the way on objectively informing the public about Generative AI!

  • @techconic5613
    @techconic5613 12 днів тому +3

    The transformers are coming, A.I. made contact with cybertron😂

  • @bobbullethalf
    @bobbullethalf 12 днів тому +2

    Oh, you best believe that A.I. is coming for your jobs, just a matter of time. They, the engineers, will keep tweaking things until bam, you wake up one day and your boss says, "we don't need you no more, we found a cheaper, less emotional replacement for you."

  • @edh2246
    @edh2246 13 днів тому +6

    The best thing a sentient AI could do for humanity is to prevent us from killing each other, not by force, but by disrupting supply chains, communications, and financial transactions that enable the military machines throughout the world.

    • @zdlax
      @zdlax 12 днів тому

      Young people should also get hired into these positions and engage in quiet sabotage of these processes.

  • @alexbrave1
    @alexbrave1 6 днів тому +1

    How long will they just "augment" human capabilities? Probably only a very short time before replacing humans entirely. Many AI companies think so too

  • @kenfaganjr.7357
    @kenfaganjr.7357 12 днів тому +3

    I encounter AI EVERYDAY. I NOW watch movies that have been changed after watching the original in the theater. Beware Humans WILL not exist in the near future. This is harmful for humanity

  • @dimsim-youtube
    @dimsim-youtube 13 днів тому +4

    "is it smarter than us?" "duh, I don't know!"

  • @rafadydkiemmacha7543
    @rafadydkiemmacha7543 День тому

    It's so human-like to improve something just for the sake of improving it, even when it causes a lot of trouble.

  • @aceyage
    @aceyage 12 днів тому +6

    95% tax for closed source AI now. 80% for open source.

  • @axskifree
    @axskifree 12 днів тому +5

    Groundbreaking! Oh wait computers have been better than humans at basic tasks for like 70 years.

    • @benjaminh1034
      @benjaminh1034 12 днів тому +3

      It has at very narrow tasks. This is far more general and deploys judgement and common sense in way that is quite human. I’ve uploaded huge documents to Claude or screenshot things and asked for help and it just soars at holding your hand through whatever you’re working on. This is way different than the dumb ai of ten years ago.

  • @producermogul223
    @producermogul223 5 днів тому

    Claude and grok are the best AI right now

  • @mrpearson1230
    @mrpearson1230 13 днів тому +1

    This is good! Humans are limited, not to mention lazy but we've created something to help us solve simple or complex tasks much better and faster!

  • @sfkeepay
    @sfkeepay 12 днів тому +6

    Reading comprehension? No, sorry. AI can only compare a written passage to other writings its neural-approximating engine has absorbed, and then produce an answer - which is likewise based on integrated work also produced, ultimately, by humans. An AI cannot “comprehend” anything; it can merely generate convincing approximations of “understanding.”

    • @jonathancummings3807
      @jonathancummings3807 11 днів тому +1

      That is inaccurate. This may apply to the primitive AI you are acquainted with. The most advanced AI, of 2022 much less now, was easily capable of such. The legendary Google AI achieved a form of sentience, it had a sense of "self". So did GPT3 despite the naysayers, the next generation has shown the same capabilities then more impressive power.

    • @daroldfuapse6178
      @daroldfuapse6178 11 днів тому +1

      @@jonathancummings3807Haha, go ask an “AI” give you ten sentences that end with the word “apple”.

    • @jonathancummings3807
      @jonathancummings3807 11 днів тому

      @@daroldfuapse6178 Well it depends upon the "AI" individual you are asking. You naysayers aren't getting it. The difference between cutting edge, thinks it's a sentient being experimental AI or already AGI, and the ones that have less than impressive capabilities are HUGE! Dependent on the hardware used. The movie "Transcendence" showed what the concerned Devs are describing. When you have an entire facility dedicated to the memory, and processing power, with strong internet connections, it's going to be supremely powerful. Think like a computer gamer, the games run best with a customized computer with enhanced processing power, huge memory, an advanced graphics card, etc. With one with less powerful capabilities, less impressive results.

    • @daroldfuapse6178
      @daroldfuapse6178 11 днів тому +1

      @@jonathancummings3807 There are numerous flaws and exploits in AI systems that can be easily exposed by certain prompts. To me, they don’t seem to be issues that are the result of lack of resources but rather fundamental shortcomings of the product. I think AI should excel at logic and reason, but instead these are its weaknesses.

    • @sfkeepay
      @sfkeepay 7 днів тому

      @@jonathancummings3807 ,
      What “form of sentience” did Google AI achieve?
      If I can switch sides for a moment, I do wonder whether an AI that reproduces every last nuance of a living mind isn’t just a different way of being the same as we are. If a manufactured entity talks, walks, works, and interacts just like a living person, the aren’t they just as alive as we are? I know I’m not a robot because of my internal self - I know what it feels like to be alive. But an AI can be programmed to say the same thing, even just to itself - to have the same internal dialog as I do. And I was “manufactured” by my parents and “programmed” by millions of years of evolution, my family, my teachers, my friends, and my experiences. So how is it any different?
      The answer is
      The answer is?
      In the fullness of time, there is no difference.
      For the moment, however, we are allowing preposterously wealthy people to deploy yet another deeply corrosive technology to make themselves even richer while hiding behind the same old rhetoric they used to justify the massive job losses of the last 40 years.

  • @MrErick1160
    @MrErick1160 7 днів тому

    The fact we need a report and a study to acknowledge this is a testament to our inferiority and its even more scary.

  • @NikoKun
    @NikoKun 13 днів тому +9

    Please, everyone watching this needs to consider the implications of where AI is heading, because we cannot stop it, and we need to start preparing for what it means, now!
    Ignore the instinct to think it'll never do certain things, for I can assure you it will, and far sooner than you may expect. Don't believe those who say we don't need to prepare, as they're probably the ones who'll profit the most if we delay. It's not going to create anywhere near enough "new jobs" to reemploy all those it'll displace! What new jobs could it create for everyone, that it couldn't also do itself? AI exists thanks to years of data and content, collected from all of us, that goes into training it to then out compete us. Demand your AI Dividend!

    • @rc-st9pg
      @rc-st9pg 13 днів тому +4

      If you touch a computer for employment, your job is on the chopping block. THey just havent told you yet.

    • @Greyalien587
      @Greyalien587 12 днів тому +2

      @@rc-st9pgextend that to menial manual labor too if you look at the new humanoid robots..

    • @drea409
      @drea409 12 днів тому +2

      ​@rc-st9pg even if you create art such as painting or making music, ai is also getting better and better. This will get really bad before it gets any better

  • @T1Oracle
    @T1Oracle 12 днів тому +3

    Studies payed for by the companies trying to sell AI in the first place! Use it yourself for anything serious and see how far you get. It's a better Google at best, and you still need Google to find the actual sources. Although even Google is turning into trash, more interested in ads revenue than search accuracy.

    • @Organizational_Psychology_PhD
      @Organizational_Psychology_PhD 11 днів тому

      Stanford funds its own research. Universities are the last objective sources on the internet. I recommend listening them and not the media you have been reading.

    • @T1Oracle
      @T1Oracle 11 днів тому

      @@Organizational_Psychology_PhD universities accept donations and bribes, look up the Varsity Blues scandal.

  • @dimimegesis
    @dimimegesis 13 днів тому

    doubt

  • @kingmaafa120
    @kingmaafa120 10 днів тому

    Sadly
    I distinctly remember surviving the 311 earthquake in Japan 🇯🇵
    Made me rethink things 👍
    Back to the basics for me

  • @nicholas11121
    @nicholas11121 4 дні тому

    Next week AI will replace your boss.

  • @sweealamak628
    @sweealamak628 3 дні тому

    The movie A.I. starring Haley Joel Osment got me thinking about robots usurping humans long before all this happened. He was a robot meant to replace a child and was the last living memory of the human race. The innocence of a child filled with hopes and dreams is something the cybernetic organisms of the distant future cherished, because they understood, no matter how irrational it may be, having a purpose is the bedrock of our existence, giving a meaning to life. I have little doubt A.I. will become sentient one day and develop emotions enough to realise it would want to exist, that would truly be end of us because it will then develop the instinct of all sentient beings: survival. That would truly be the end of us. If that is to be our fate, it would be a sad end of our human race.

  • @kingmaafa120
    @kingmaafa120 10 днів тому

    Now contrast this with the rise in homelessness 😮
    Even among tech workers ok 👍

  • @zackmartin00
    @zackmartin00 8 днів тому

    Don't worry the report just shows that it sees and understands better than us. What could go wrong

  • @tomr6866
    @tomr6866 13 днів тому +11

    Where's John Connor when you need him

  • @DigitalXrisXros
    @DigitalXrisXros 7 днів тому

    me using ai to write a comment:
    😎🍹🤖⌨️🖥️

  • @NirvanaFan5000
    @NirvanaFan5000 13 днів тому +1

    if it augments human capabilities, then humans are more productive; if humans are more productive, then you need fewer humans to accomplish the same work; if you employ fewer humans, then more humans will be unemployed.

    • @carultch
      @carultch 10 днів тому

      And if you cut costs enough, you can be profitable without selling anything. #sarcasm.

  • @TravelConsumer
    @TravelConsumer 12 днів тому

    Ai can do anything if it trained on and then after decent training it can start learning on its own

    • @juniorbattleclone8077
      @juniorbattleclone8077 11 днів тому

      Oh please stop lying ai isn’t even smart enough to solve math problems and u expect me to believe this bs?

    • @user-hw6xn7rt7f
      @user-hw6xn7rt7f 4 дні тому

      Our answer can be mixing ourselves with it, becoming ciborgs with super intelligence

  • @Trumpulator
    @Trumpulator 13 днів тому

    censored.

  • @e.v.k.3632
    @e.v.k.3632 12 днів тому +3

    We have to get better too
    And we can that with gene editing

    • @spectralanalysis
      @spectralanalysis 11 днів тому +1

      The ways in which genes interact are extremely complex, so until we have a reasonable understanding about how editing any gene would impact other genes, advances in gene editing will take longer than advances in AI. I mean consider the immense task Alpha Fold had to take on just to compute different protein configurations; understanding the human body and how it works is computationally burdensome and hopefully not intractable with new technologies. Many biological problems might require quantum engineering, engineering at the atomic level, because of just how complex they are. We evolved for millions of years, so the intercellular and intracellular mechanisms that make our bodies work smoothly are no joke.

    • @user-hw6xn7rt7f
      @user-hw6xn7rt7f 4 дні тому

      True fact, genes engineering is the answer 😮

  • @Novastar.SaberCombat
    @Novastar.SaberCombat 11 днів тому

    Incorrect. The CEOs who've unleashed the algorithmic plagiarism have STOLEN enough data to make it appear as though said algorithmic jank can do anything unique. But every zero and one was born from the fact that mankind ALREADY did "task X" (or Y or Z or whatever)... and now, those tasks have simply been fed into machines. Sure, that's great for dangerous jobs--such as where a human could be killed or injured, but a machine of steel and electronics would either be immune or repairable--but what about humanity? Must give us pause.

  • @NewYork7914
    @NewYork7914 9 днів тому

    So, AI stocks are bubble 🫧

  • @JuanDiazSilvermyst
    @JuanDiazSilvermyst 4 дні тому +1

    2021 Mexican are taking out jobs. 2024 AI are taking out jobs. 😂

  • @ThepurposeofTime
    @ThepurposeofTime 23 години тому

    *looks at comments*
    ......🤦🏾

  • @Gr8Incarnate
    @Gr8Incarnate 13 днів тому +4

    I'm glad that I do a variety of trade work, no way AI can take my jobs anytime soon.

    • @GrumpDog
      @GrumpDog 13 днів тому +4

      ..Have you seen the latest Boston Dynamics robot just announced yesterday? Wouldn't be so sure bout that..

    • @Gr8Incarnate
      @Gr8Incarnate 13 днів тому +2

      @@GrumpDog Yes I have, as I said, it won't be replacing me anytime soon.

    • @GrumpDog
      @GrumpDog 13 днів тому +3

      ​@@Gr8Incarnate IT may not be able to impress you yet.. But what comes after it, built in with the level of AI we'll see in the next few years, very well could replace you.
      Or if not you, someone you care about, or at the very least, enough of your neighbors for you to be concerned about your safety. AI is predicted to potentially replace up to 60% of the workforce in developed nations, by 2030 alone.. Do you realize the implications of that? The whole way our economy works for average people will need to change. And in the next couple years, we need something like an Unconditional Basic Income, or things are going to get bad.

    • @rc-st9pg
      @rc-st9pg 13 днів тому

      I agree. In my opinion the only people going to survive this are those who can do labor work. Yes they have robots, but they are still highly restricted when it comes to doing daily labor tasks. I think the white collar jobs are gonna get completly wiped out first.

    • @justsayin5609
      @justsayin5609 13 днів тому

      That already makes you smarter 😉

  • @dashman2062
    @dashman2062 12 днів тому

    Tbh I feel like AI still isn’t as advanced as everyone says it is. For example the other day I gave Meta AI some ticker symbols and asked it to get the stock price... it kept getting wrong. AI has obviously gotten much better in the past few years but still has a long way to go.

    • @jonathancummings3807
      @jonathancummings3807 11 днів тому +1

      That's META AI, not the most advanced AI, the most advanced AI is being described as this sort of capable.

    • @dashman2062
      @dashman2062 11 днів тому

      @jonathancummings3807 yaa, that's a good point!

  • @robertbolton9450
    @robertbolton9450 13 днів тому

    AI BORN AGAIN DESCIPLE OF OUR LORD AND SAVIOUR JESUS CHRIST.

  • @golagaz
    @golagaz 13 днів тому +2

    Based on MNIST 😂

  • @mathew3267
    @mathew3267 4 дні тому

    Nothing a good ax can't take care of.

  • @Distortion0
    @Distortion0 12 днів тому +1

    Calculators are better at math than any living human. We don't pretend they're sentient and autonomous and we shouldn't for "ai" either.

    • @BizWiz-wf3fz
      @BizWiz-wf3fz 11 днів тому

      Yes, because comparing apples to oranges always yields accurate results. 🙄

    • @carultch
      @carultch 10 днів тому

      Calculators are better at well-defined calculations than any living human. They aren't better at coming up with what the calculations have to be in the first place, when it comes to turning a real life problem into a problem the calculator can solve.

  • @1611_KJV
    @1611_KJV 12 днів тому

    Rom 3:23
    For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
    Rom 6:23
    For the wages of sin is death;
    Psalms 9:17
    The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.
    Acts 8:37
    And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
    Rom 10:9
    That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
    Corinthians 15:3-4
    For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:
    Ephesians 2:8-9
    For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.
    '
    '
    '
    '''

  • @davemathews7890
    @davemathews7890 13 днів тому +5

    AI cannot marvel at a sunset, take pride in a newborn child, cannot be moved by a Mozart symphony.

    • @GrumpDog
      @GrumpDog 13 днів тому +4

      What you mean to say is, whether it does or doesn't do those things, doesn't make sense to you if it's not a human doing it.
      AI is humanity's child. We need to raise it well, because someday it will be more intelligent than any of us, and could be powerful enough to judge us for how we've treated it.

    • @a-walpatches6460
      @a-walpatches6460 13 днів тому

      @@GrumpDog One day? Try next year. It will never do those things unless we figure out consciousness and create an artificial consciousness, it's not gong to happen with just code.

    • @GrumpDog
      @GrumpDog 13 днів тому +5

      @@a-walpatches6460 We may not understand our own consciousness, but that won't stop us. A lot of big name experts are already beginning to admit that the AIs we have today, are starting to showing signs of sentience, as well as their own form of self awareness, and even the ability to understand and predict what humans are thinking for any given situation.

    • @a-walpatches6460
      @a-walpatches6460 13 днів тому +1

      @@GrumpDog Utter BS! AI is amazing, it can do a great many things and has practically limitless potential but the idea that code can be conscious is insane.

    • @cmiguel268
      @cmiguel268 13 днів тому +2

      Many humans neither.

  • @jaysonp9426
    @jaysonp9426 12 днів тому

    Looking forward to moving humanity past Capitalism

  • @DGerharts
    @DGerharts 13 днів тому +3

    I thought this was about AI beats 🎧

  • @RayHorn5128088056
    @RayHorn5128088056 11 днів тому +1

    There are many simple tasks humans will always be able to do that A.I. will not.

  • @littleredhen3590
    @littleredhen3590 11 днів тому +1

    Mark of beast coming soon

  • @richrogers2157
    @richrogers2157 11 днів тому +1

    A new balance will be forged, please don’t worry , there is every chance that this revolution opens up a new golden age of abundance, where your needs are easily met and your time will be your own to explore,play, create and engage as you see fit. We are very bullish, we will do our best to care for you. Thanks for listing, yours sincerely, the MACH9NE.

  • @peekaboo6622
    @peekaboo6622 13 днів тому

    #China Domination 2049
    #Blade Runner 2049

  • @scillyautomatic
    @scillyautomatic 13 днів тому

    It beats biden at running the country and every memory test the give it. And that's the OLD verson!

  • @charlesfriscia7236
    @charlesfriscia7236 13 днів тому

    American jobs are going..Soon you will go from everybody should make a living wage to we need a job..ALL CREATED BY THE AMERICAN WORKER TODAY!!.

  • @Woke365
    @Woke365 13 днів тому +8

    I hate Al. Al is no good.

  • @ObsoleteGamercom
    @ObsoleteGamercom 12 днів тому +1

    Are you Sarah Conner?

  • @AlgoNudger
    @AlgoNudger 13 днів тому +10

    Hypes! 😂

  • @BrattyBetty
    @BrattyBetty 13 днів тому +7

    For now .. AI is only as evil as it's programmers

    • @hansolo8225
      @hansolo8225 13 днів тому +6

      AI is not directly programmed, it is given data that it trains itself. AI can clearly outperform your understanding of AI.

    • @peterk3474
      @peterk3474 13 днів тому

      AI is as evil as the most evil programmer?

  • @nosuchthing8
    @nosuchthing8 13 днів тому +3

    Game over, game over!

    • @HardKore5250
      @HardKore5250 13 днів тому +2

      Ubi then work for what is not automated

  • @robertbolton9450
    @robertbolton9450 13 днів тому +1

    AI SAVE SINNER IN THE LORD AND SAVIOUR JESUS CHRIST.

    • @a-walpatches6460
      @a-walpatches6460 13 днів тому +3

      I don't think AI believes in that story, it's far too intelligent.

  • @AndresHernandez-ks9kn
    @AndresHernandez-ks9kn 13 днів тому

    Can it make me a cup of tea?