Lebhafte und wunderschöne Interpretation dieser kompakten und fein komponierten Sinfonie mit gut harmonisierten und perfekt entsprechenden Tönen aller Instrumente. Der zweite Satz klingt besonders schön und echt beruhigend. Im Kontrast klingt der dritte Satz echt lebhaft und auch begeisternd. Wunderbar von A bis Z!
@@zeenohaquo7970 It's 104 + symphony A + symphony B + Sinfonia Concertante = 107. (The counting of Hoboken is erroneous. The CD set of Dennis Russell Davies (conductor) contains the symphonies in what is considered the chronological order. If you are interested, take a look.
@@DressedForDrowning The Sinfonia concertante whilst listed with the symphonies as Hob. I:105 is *not* a symphony (neither are Mozart’s two sinfonie concertanti K297b and K364). The 107th symphony is the sinfonia Hob. I:106 (three movement overture to Le pescatrici).
Haydn is *not* the ‘Father of the Symphony’; it is probably the single biggest piece of disinformation in the whole of western classical music. A father by definition must be involved at the *conception,* but when the first modern early-Classical symphonies began to appear around 1740 in Milan (Sammartini, Brioschi), Mannheim (Johann Stamitz, Richter, Holzbauer, Fils), and Vienna (Wagenseil, Monn), Haydn was a little boy singing treble in St Stephen’s Cathedral in Vienna and fathering nothing. Haydn’s first symphony was Symphony 1 of 1757; Johann Stamitz *died* in 1757 having written about sixty modern Classical symphonies, some in four movements, some with clarinets. Stamitz on his own exposes the utter absurdity - and unfairness - of attributing paternity of the symphony to Haydn which is only tenable if you disregard all known facts about the birth of the form, along with the proper meaning of the word ‘father’. Hope that’s helpful and enlightening.
@@sidneimigueldossantossidne9426 Haydn’s Symphony 1 is now universally accepted as being composed in *1757,* and it being his first symphony. You might find my longer explanation to Paul Forsdick (above) of some interest.
Comparing composers of this stature is as pointless as comparing red and blue; that said, everyone can have their own favourites - but that’s a different thing.
@@Acujeremy I get your point, but surely you cannot meaningfully compare Beethoven with composers from a different age, or who composed in different genres. Comparing Beethoven to Verdi or Puccini makes no sense given the former wrote little operatic music whilst the latter two wrote little else. Comparing Beethoven to Scarlatti, Bach, Chopin, Liszt, Rachmaninov, Bartok - or any other keyboard composer - likewise seems pointless to me as they are simply too different. Even comparing Beethoven to his immediate predecessors Mozart and Haydn is fraught with difficulties as the music of one is the product of the Age of Revolution, whilst the other two represent the Ancien Regime, The Ages of Reason and Enlightenment, a difference that is audible in almost every note they wrote. Comparing the symphonies of Beethoven with Mahler, Shostakovitch… Comparing Beethoven with Palestrina, Byrd, Tallis… Comparing Beethoven with Bach’s Passions or the operas and oratorios of Handel… Et cetera. I do agree that Beethoven’s music is incomparable, which is exactly why that is not something I would ever attempt to do.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 If we put Beethoven in the center of all music, the axis of all Western music, we can compare everything to him. That would give us pre-Beethoven, Beethoven and post-Beethoven. Try and see things in this perspective and see if it makes sense to you. This even carries on to modern times, as remember, producers like George Martin of The Beatles, would have also been well-versed in Beethoven.
Diese Sinfonie von Haydn finde ich begeisternd schön,sie kommt heute wie gerufen,danke!
Lebhafte und wunderschöne Interpretation dieser kompakten und fein komponierten Sinfonie mit gut harmonisierten und perfekt entsprechenden Tönen aller Instrumente. Der zweite Satz klingt besonders schön und echt beruhigend. Im Kontrast klingt der dritte Satz echt lebhaft und auch begeisternd. Wunderbar von A bis Z!
Haydn is just what I need this Monday morning.
아름다운 연주곡 잘 들었습니다~감사합니다~🎵🎻🎻📯🌿🍀☘🌹🌹☘🍀🌿❤❤수고 많으셨습니다~☕
This is going to be a looooong series
Love Haydn-wonderful joyous quality.
Heavenly Haydn Symphony! Supreme!
Incredible classical piece. Oh the stories music alone could tell!
감사합니다
موسيقى الفرح والحبور والصفاء والتفاؤل....
هايدن 🌺🌺🌺
What about me?
@@m.zn_11 what about you😂?
Mozart is the best ❤
Распрекрасно!..
Heaven on earth
Brilliant.
Superb
The first of many, I'm sure😉🤭
1 / 104 👍
@@zeenohaquo7970
Recte 1/107 👍👍
@@zeenohaquo7970 It's 104 + symphony A + symphony B + Sinfonia Concertante = 107. (The counting of Hoboken is erroneous. The CD set of Dennis Russell Davies (conductor) contains the symphonies in what is considered the chronological order. If you are interested, take a look.
@@DressedForDrowning interesting. Danke. 👍
@@DressedForDrowning
The Sinfonia concertante whilst listed with the symphonies as Hob. I:105 is *not* a symphony (neither are Mozart’s two sinfonie concertanti K297b and K364).
The 107th symphony is the sinfonia Hob. I:106 (three movement overture to Le pescatrici).
하이든은 언제 들어도 행복해요~!!
The Father of Symphony!
Haydn is *not* the ‘Father of the Symphony’; it is probably the single biggest piece of disinformation in the whole of western classical music.
A father by definition must be involved at the *conception,* but when the first modern early-Classical symphonies began to appear around 1740 in Milan (Sammartini, Brioschi), Mannheim (Johann Stamitz, Richter, Holzbauer, Fils), and Vienna (Wagenseil, Monn), Haydn was a little boy singing treble in St Stephen’s Cathedral in Vienna and fathering nothing.
Haydn’s first symphony was Symphony 1 of 1757; Johann Stamitz *died* in 1757 having written about sixty modern Classical symphonies, some in four movements, some with clarinets.
Stamitz on his own exposes the utter absurdity - and unfairness - of attributing paternity of the symphony to Haydn which is only tenable if you disregard all known facts about the birth of the form, along with the proper meaning of the word ‘father’.
Hope that’s helpful and enlightening.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 thanks!
✅
1795???
1759...
@@sidneimigueldossantossidne9426
Haydn’s Symphony 1 is now universally accepted as being composed in *1757,* and it being his first symphony.
You might find my longer explanation to Paul Forsdick (above) of some interest.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 Thank you.
A symphony every Tuesday?
One every Monday for most of the world, but I think for the latest 2 timezones it's one every Tuesday yes!
@@BrilliantClassics Wow so in around 2 years and half, we will have the full cycle. In 2025!
Btw, I love this channel so much.
Binge.
1759 MORE LIKE
Ah ok, I was wondering, wow didn't realize Haydn didn't have a symphony until after Mozart died.
Haydn’s Symphony 1 was composed in *1757,* it was his first symphony.
This piece most certainly was not completed by 1795. Especially if it was Hadyn’s first.
Haydn (sic) wrote his first symphony in 1757.
In my opinion, Haydn was a greater composer than Mozart the Younger Son. The son of a butcher man.
Mozart 36, 38,39,40,41 are hard to beat!
Comparing composers of this stature is as pointless as comparing red and blue; that said, everyone can have their own favourites - but that’s a different thing.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 I compare everyone to Beethoven as he is the axis of all music in my opinion.
@@Acujeremy
I get your point, but surely you cannot meaningfully compare Beethoven with composers from a different age, or who composed in different genres.
Comparing Beethoven to Verdi or Puccini makes no sense given the former wrote little operatic music whilst the latter two wrote little else.
Comparing Beethoven to Scarlatti, Bach, Chopin, Liszt, Rachmaninov, Bartok - or any other keyboard composer - likewise seems pointless to me as they are simply too different.
Even comparing Beethoven to his immediate predecessors Mozart and Haydn is fraught with difficulties as the music of one is the product of the Age of Revolution, whilst the other two represent the Ancien Regime, The Ages of Reason and Enlightenment, a difference that is audible in almost every note they wrote.
Comparing the symphonies of Beethoven with Mahler, Shostakovitch…
Comparing Beethoven with Palestrina, Byrd, Tallis…
Comparing Beethoven with Bach’s Passions or the operas and oratorios of Handel…
Et cetera.
I do agree that Beethoven’s music is incomparable, which is exactly why that is not something I would ever attempt to do.
@@elaineblackhurst1509 If we put Beethoven in the center of all music, the axis of all Western music, we can compare everything to him. That would give us pre-Beethoven, Beethoven and post-Beethoven. Try and see things in this perspective and see if it makes sense to you. This even carries on to modern times, as remember, producers like George Martin of The Beatles, would have also been well-versed in Beethoven.