All you need to know to understand 5G
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 чер 2024
- Special Christmas deal! Get 68% off of a 2-year plan and get 4 additional months free. Just go to nordvpn.org/sabine and use our coupon code sabine at checkout.
You can support me on Patreon: / sabine
The two open letters by scientists are here:
www.5gappeal.eu/about/
emfscientist.org/
The meta-review shown at 14 mins 39 secs is this one:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti...
The article I quote at about 15 mins is this:
spectrum.ieee.org/news-from-a...
The WHO site I refer to at 15 mins 37 secs is here:
www.who.int/news-room/q-a-det...
You can join the chat about this video on Saturday (Dec 19) at noon Eastern Time/6pm CET here:
talk.conversful.com/c?id=-MOg...
0:00 Intro
0:41 What is 5G?
3:44 What is electromagnetic radiation
6:28 What damage can electromagnetic radiation do?
9:20 Frequency vs Power
12:01 Back to 5G: What's the problem?
14:05 What is known about mm waves?
16:28 Sponsor Message
#science #technology #education - Наука та технологія
Man, there must be some kind of award we can all insist be given to Sabine. She is doing precisely what is needed to enable the public to make informed decisions in a democracy. Thank you so much, Sabine.
@Schlomo Baconberg the Sir John Templeton award is better, and offers more $ in recognition of accomplishments as well.
Yes, The Most European Looking Woman Award, lol.
@Brand Ex and the one that’s easiest to follow because the individual listener is excused from being required and demanded or expected to take even the tiniest degree of personal responsibility for themselves.. instant gratification means zero discipline or sacrifice. Such is the reality of “group think.”
Eric, I agree that Sabine is explaining this in the way that is needed for the public. Unfortunately, I do not think that most of these 5G phobes would sit through Sabine's lesson, much less understand what she is saying. But this is a very good explanation.
I am not afraid one little bit of 5G RF radiation
@erichodge....no she's not (giving the Public what is needed for making 'informed' decisions in a 'democracy').... what we NEED are CONCLUSIVE clinical studies for 5G.... what we're getting INSTEAD is.... a BLIND roll-out.... TONE-deaf too....
Explaining difficult concepts in such a clear and concise manner is a skill and a talent. I watch a ton of scientific channels, only a few that manage to make it stick like this one. Massive respect and thanks!
So all it does is irritate the eyes and damage the skin?... No problem! Where do I sign up for yearly corneal replacement surgery?
@@jackandblaze5956 nope and nope, next question?
I couldn’t watch all of this but at no point am I seeing her address the polarization of natural frequencies from the sun vs the polarization of man made electromagnetic frequencies. Two entirely different things which have entirely different effects on cells.
Essentially one allows the molecule to remain on its natural path (sun) & the other acts as a magnet and interferes with the natural “spin” of the electrons within the atom.
To say that exciting a molecule, such as an oxygen molecule, will cause no harm from a non-ionizing radiation stand point is not true and reversing or interfering with the electrons of that molecule will cause harm and atomic collapse, especially at extended exposure.
It changes the whole structure of the atom. Basic 6th grade science, the electrons DEFINE the atom. Changes to those electrons cause atomic collapse and cell death or in bodily case oxidative stress. Up your antioxidants. Oxidation is literally defined as the loss of electrons. Grounding brings electrons back to the body.
Interfering with, or exciting the electrons of an oxygen molecule WILL hinder it from “uptake” by hemoglobin. Leading to oxygen starvation and coagulation of the blood cells(as we’ve seen non stop during the last two years) think of the insane amounts of strokes and heart attacks even prior to the waxxinations.
Don’t let this “teach or relieve fears.” There’s a whole other side to the quantum physics of this she didn’t even touch. She gave the tip of the iceberg for lay people so they wouldn’t dig deeper.
@@i.mikulasek3315 lol so you have organic radiation and man made lol, You could win a Nobel prize with your new discovery, tell us how do you measure if your EM's are organic?
@@i.mikulasek3315 lol pure word salad.
I am 2 years late to the conversation but whoa! This is the best, simplest explanation to a very complex issue. Can’t thank you enough!
and she is so clear and concise! i love her
It’s not _that_ complicated unless you’re really into the nuts & bolts of it.
Seriously, Sabine has to be one of the few who can explain ideas with such impressive logic and clarity.
Looks like an A.I. robot. That might explain it. And if so. It's Always going to soften you up to the agenda. Do your own research. Read NASA's silent weapons for quiet wars. For starters.
Agreed 100%. Teachers like her are very rare.
You have not seen Electroboom's channel.
There are plenty others but she's the only one you know.
Phenomenal presentation, per usual, from Sabine. In less than 20 minutes I was more educated about 5G than if I'd spent two months of my life perusing network news websites.
95% of media in most nations is propaganda ,gaslighting and lies.
Her husband?
they are not telling you everything 5g is really about... they left out the mind control part
Realy True Rick Kearn.Matrix reloaded
@@obivankeno2068 It sadly is true.... the worst part is they are keeping it a secret, your body vibrates when they use it on you when they force you to move.... It is a little messed up sadly
Since the new frequencies are not ionizing and cannot penetrate deeply (a few mm at most) into the body, one must presumably concentrate on thermal effects. Far higher frequencies like infrared and light reach our skin in powers of 1-2kW/m², at noon in summer or close to a big campfire. This is what we perceive as "nice and warm". There is no way the small 5G radio cells will even come close to such energy densities.
So I tend not to see any danger in it.
However, I agree that this should be covered as soon as possible and comprehensively in studies to make absolutely sure that nothing is overlooked and to bring this discussion back to a factual level.
Thank you Ms. Hossenfelder, for your really well done videos. This is really a helpful contribution to the topic!
Wifi/cellphone signals affect calcium channels on the skin. This does have an effect on the body in the long term. Look up how calcium is used by the body and which organs.
hello mr sven, why did US airport workers who were operating mm bodyscanners became seriously ill after few weeks?
you didnt watch this did ya
look at her talk to dmg to molecules
eg put an egg in microwave
it doesnt ionize either
@@flyfin108 You're probably thinking of backscatter X-ray scanners which use x-rays, more energetic than mm waves by more than 5 orders of magnitude. They're banned in the EU, whereas mm waves have been used worldwide since the late 2000's with no discovered side effects. If the US airport workers actually got seriously ill working with mm scanners, they should probably eat a salad and exercise every now and then, rather than blame mm wave scanners.
Sabine is one of the most interesting people on youtube. Clear, concise, funny, insightful, optimistic, warm, intelligent....and so on. Grateful for her.
And maybe, she is a simpleton?
Thank you Sabine, very in formative, the world of molecules, etc.. have always been a little confusing. Your clear explanation was easy to understand. I hope you teach many students. Best wishes
You should compare the power recieved from 5G to other heat / (non-ionizing) radiation sources. 5G tissue heating is negligible compared to standing under the sun or the isolating effect of wearing warm clothing, or even compared to the heat generated by the body itself.
Agreed, I’m surprised Sabine left it where she did. It leaves the impression that we know less than we do, that all the studies at previous frequencies now mean very little.
I've a dangerously small education in electronics communications. I studied microwave coms. So I'm about the be a smart arse LOL. Seriously but, as I see it, the power level of radiation received by a device is minuscule compared to the power level transmitted. This is due to the inverse square law. But even if you said transmitted rather than received, I'd prefer to see the actual numbers rather than just such accepting such a claim. As she said, very few studies have been done to date. And frankly, I'd be surprised if you were shown to be wrong if such studies were done. Not placing bets but :)
@Matthew Morycinskiyou’re just playing concern-troll. Each one of those questions you pose has well defined answers written in industry standards. The maximum allowable power directed at human tissue is also well defined and is very very low.
This is what we’re disappointed that Sabine did not go into detail about
Taking risk is one thing. Having risk forced upon you is another.
Like cars. They rarely even put barriers between sidewalks and roads. Its fucked.
@@lucidhominid2190 no one forced you to use sidewalk
Like she said, you get the biggest exposure by holding a 5G-operating cell phone close to your head. This risc you can avoid.
@@WalkingEmDry They literally have actually. The government has required me to move my body from one location to another in a situation where a sidewalk was the only option.
Agreed!
This little lady still amazes the hell out of me!
Excellent conveyance of the situation. You have a knack for explaining things. Thanks
A clear voice, unbiased and excellent description of what should be of concern. I am now a subscriber. (Engineer and ex radio operator)
I look at more than a dozen videos every day on a huge number of things, space, history, mechanics, architecture, on and on. This is one of the very best ones I have ever seen for being informative, relevant, timely, and easy to understand (though I admit to being an engineer). Thanks Dr. Hossenfelder
Try PBS Space Time. Way more in depth usually.
@@davidhand9721 Their videos about the "mind" are garbage, but it's usually an excelente channel.
Big problem, she didn't explain 5g. She basically talked about the mm wave capacity expansion. 99 percent of the 5g market will use the exact same frequencies they were using with 4g. 5g is simply advanced multiplexing. 4G phones could only receive and transmit one band at one time. 5G phones can receive multiple bands and transmit on multiple bands also on multiple towers simultaneously. That's the reason for the phase array antennas. It's all about capacity distribution. By the way the 5G system was in place over 2 years ago. I helped install it. Former cellular tower equipment tech.
@@Bryan-Hensley phones like the iPhone 12 in US use the mm wave 5G. And almost all the controversy about health risk is because the higher energy of the mm wave of the 5G technology.
@@Bryan-Hensley THANKS!!! Are there articles I can read (and post) about this?
The presentation is simply mesmerizing. Clear-cut and does not presume any prior knowledge.
Sabine - Thank you for a very lucid presentation. One answer is to keep as much distance between you and the emitter of 5G radiation. In other words do not keep your ear touching your 5G mobiles for long periods of time. Use wireless pods instead if you use your mobile for very long periods of time.
Science with Sabine, always makes for a good Saturday
Any day with a smart lady like Sabine is a good day.
Remember, Monday you have to work!
Amen! (kidding)
Agreed. 🤗
www.scientificamerican.com/article/mind-control-by-cell/
I’m a lifetime cellular engineer. Your explanation is wonderful, but a couple comments:
1. This biggest issue here is that high bands don’t propagate well, and therefore must use a highly directive antenna. And since the wavelength is small, it is possible to make a highly directive antenna in a reasonable size. Since is both feasible and necessary, all deployments use beamforming antennas. So even at moderate total transmit power, the power in one direction can be extremely high. To me, that is the overwhelming key point that is different from low bands (where such highly directive antenna is neither needed nor feasible). 5G antennas I worked with had max EIRP around +65dbm, which is approaching 4000watts (higher than a microwave oven). The total power is much lower, but EIRP is the “effective” power including the directional focus. And if you are standing in the beam, the fact that the power outside the beam is much lower is irrelevant.
2. I don’t think it is a fair characterization to say that people “missed the point” that these new bands presented new risks. Perhaps a few people missed that point, but certainly none of us in the industry did. This was one of the first topics to receive attention and discussion. I am not arguing that letting industry stakeholders make such a call is appropriate; I’m just saying we were well aware that it was a (new) issue. See for example to the work of Ted Rappaport (long time expert in cellular channel characterization).
wireless.engineering.nyu.edu/mmwave-health-effects/
3. I always thought it was funny that these bands are called “millimeter wave.” 30GHz is a centimeter. That is marketing, I guess -- millimeter sounds cooler than centimeter.
Great comment. It often gets missed but it can use up to 100GHz. Depending on the antenna type
Well if you were really concerned about 2. wouldn't your industry study this before creating the standard? The fact is that money drives your decisions and not safety concerns. Your profession lacks ethics or morality. You do whatever your boss tells you to do. You are like robots without souls.
@@twinwankel i think you miscontrue engineers with the rest of humanity as a whole. Humanity has no morals and is driven purely by capitalism and brutal acquisition of wealth and power , often knowing at the expense of others. So get back in your box and have another long think about your life.
Sabine's usual sub-freshman-level, vague presentation doesn't help. My understanding on 5G is more varied and that it still employs lower fequency microwave, less than 30GHz.
@@twinwankel "You do whatever your boss tells you to do" Lol, I bet when your boss tells you to do something you tell him to go to hell instead. See how much you can keep your job in that "ehtical profession" of yours.
Very well presented research. My major concern with 5G is actually the amount of 5G devices that'll be in use 24/7 like antennas, surveillance equipment, mobile devices etc etc. The exposure to individuals over a period of time, once all the various devices have been implemented, is, in my opinion a very serious health issue. Everything about existence is vibrations. Exposure to a different vibration over time is for better or worse life changing.
It's like worrying about the depth of the water when you're already upto you're eyeballs
Now, that is a great, clear, factual, and rational way of talking about a muddled controversial subject, thank you! Loved it, subbed.
I wish I had you as a professor when I was in college. Thank you for your devotion ro science and people
I loved how unbiased this video was, thank you so much Sabine
Providing essential data needed, in a didactically very well organized, short and simple manner;
In such a way to give people from different places and backgrounds, the necessary information that matters, to make them understand, perceive and feel the importance, and properly act on the subjects treated by Sabine.
On the messages she has been producing and publishing, as this very one; (on the risks of 5G technology to health);
Certainly contributes to clarify and form social opinion on various of nowadays obscure or polemic objects of public concern; and furnish excellent example to be learned about that art by Sabine shown !
I can only imagine how much effort and time it took to find and compile this information so clear and compact. Well done and very interesting.
probably half an hour, this is very basic physics
@@bobfake3831: But if you ignore the time she spent becoming a physicist, then you're ignoring most of the time she's spent gathering the information.
@@jeschinstad lel, no, this and its maths are maybe one course in a semester
@@bobfake3831: I don't think that would've given her the hundreds of thousands of viewers, so I think you're still ignoring the context.
The information comes from the telephone companies themselves. May be a conflict of interest.
Sabine is always highly informative and down to earth. Thank you! Always a joy to watch and learn!!
You call believing or accepting without question learning?
Interesting, no wonder the manufacturers of cosmetics or sliced white bread and confidence tricksters make such healthy livings
Nice her teachings really hit home easily .
This is a great explanation video for people to a understand 5G concepts and other spectrums of microwave technologies etc, I was a Telecom Engineer for many years and find the advancement fascinating but not without concern, these 5G node antennas will be on every other lamp pole this is the next stage of 5G to implement mm waves plus the installation of about 4000 orbiting satillites. The total saturation of the planet of many different spectrum of frenqencies is a concern foresure, thankyou for sharing a very accurate and informative video.
'Knowledge' is so beautiful to me when explained rationally and understood without bias. Thank you Sabine from this new subscriber.
Off topic: This is one of the few channels which can persuade me to watch the sponsor ad part without any impatience.
Is that what FB said
I don’t know what that is like because I have YT Red. Totally worth it, if you can afford it.
I really love your vids . Clear and direct . Thanks
We should of learnt like this in the school....I'm 58 and never heard the explanation so clearly Thank you Sabine 🙏🌟🔥
It is so nice to hear an intelligent explanation of basic things that we should all understand.
I am sorry when and where did she explain the effects of 5g on single cells and, the formula to calculate the risk increase due to the erection of more arrays over a smaller distance? Also how does this affect pollinators, considering the possibility of food shortages. I mean science has got to eat right ?
'Fer sure, and she seems to have a knack for doing this, whether it's explaining Quantum Physics, or the science behind Telecommunications 'controversies'!
@Kev Backwoods Yes...... They Turned up the FREQUENCY and people dropped DEAD ‼️ your Absolutely correct 💯,.... I have started to do research on FREQUENCY 😉🙌🏽💜😇
@vctjkhme that is a lie. The studies have been done. She is either lying or she is ignorant of them.
@@SHREDTILLDEAD - show us!
Our smart phones are fast enough now. I don't see why we really need 5G before more health risk studies are done.
They don't care about our health. It's about surveillance and control. Stop being naive.
@@rachelarmel7547 I mean I do need you to explain how you got to that conclusion. If you mean that 5G would allow the internet of things which would then in turn allow more privacy invasion then yeah, but I'm not entirely sure that's what you mean
You are constraint by your data bandwidth. You might not realize it until a new technology appears that uses more bandwidth.
@Dalej Lama wonder where we hurry
I was perfectly happy with my disc phone ☎️ because I still had some personal freedom and could go out without being emotionally harassed !!
Everything has to go faster and faster until we ram into a wall or run out of gas !!
Either way, it's going to end in disaster !!
Love how you explain things. Makes it easier to follow with a little common sense. Thank you..!!
A word of appreciation for your well-balanced views and insight. Thank you.
I've learned and understood more about physics and science from Sabine that my children are reading and subscribing. Thank You for making learning exciting and enjoyable.
Have you any way of verifying, or falsifying what she tells you or do you just accept what she tells you without question? why are humans so credulous?
Is it not the case that if X can be perfectly certain that his audience or interlocutors are in no position either to verify or falsify what he tells them, may he not invent anything he pleases?-They can never know whether or not he is lying or just inventing what he says.
Is that not exactly correct?
@@vhawk1951kl No, because your argument breaks down before reaching half way through its first sentence.
"Is it not the case that if X can be perfectly certain". A physical human can sever be perfectly certain of anything.
@@vhawk1951kl You cannot trust anyone I take it? How can you learn anything because you know deep down that every successful person attempting to share their knowledge with you became so by intentional deception. Have I summed up your understanding of the impossibility of sharing knowledge or misinterpreted your attempt at sarcasm?
@@vhawk1951kl U ever asked the same q's in church ?
@@user-pg5rt7ju4f I don't do church, Jews don't go to" church", not do we understand why some that are not Jews suppose our book to be magic. If you suppose our jewbook to be magic, why don't you chsnge from whatever you imagine yourself to be to Judaism, if its book is all you crack it up to be. Seemingly Brian was a Jew so if you imagine you are a Brianist or christian(which you could no more be than you can fly)it would be logical to adopt his religion, would it not? Particularly if you suppose the jewbook to be magic, which it is not, it is just another book but written by rabbis -Is *that* what makes it magic?
People have been baking themselves with 1000 Watt infrared space heaters for decades which have a frequency of 430THz-300GHz and wavelength of 700nm-1mm. 5G antennas have a transmission power anywhere between 250mW and 120W for the largest arrays. The only danger from 5G I can think of is getting injured climbing the antennas to disable them.
Resonant frequency vibration should be an area for further research. I don’t know of many studies about these effects. Every molecule and by extension group of molecules has a resonant frequency. This is why bridges fail over time, and why objects can be shaken apart with the right vibrational frequency. Sure, microwave or mm waves don’t have the correct energy to break chemical bonds, but you can absolutely get the correct frequency to shake molecules apart due to resonance (vibration).
"I burned myself trying to burn down a 5G antenna, those things are dangerous" is something I can imagine some people saying
If you ask about a topic if its dangerous you'll find enough people getting very scared and trying to avoid anything to do with it at all costs, regardless of any proven fact or not, and even if the answer is no.
I remember studies where apes had been submitted to various EM radiations. Even if it didn't damage their tissues, it did change their behaviors in a significant way and that something to consider. Our brain also uses EM waves to function properly, and people close to antennas may experience the same effect as these apes. It really should have been studied deeper before using a tech on such a large scale.
Millimeter waves in the 30-50 GHz range are more penetrating than infrared, so they would affect deeper layers of the body.
As Sabine said, it is _reasonable_ to expect them to be innocuous, but it is arguably _unreasonable_ to deploy them throughout entire cities (and more importantly people's hands and pockets) without sufficient safety tests, which have not been done.
Great video, i've been trying to find info about this topic and this video was one of the best i've seen.
What would be the effect of the magnetic waves on graphene oxides?
This video deserves having subs in different languages, so that more people can learn more about 5G
planning on doing it for Italian subs
@@Dasha-lr4mv ty.
My mistake.
so put that microwave oven to your head. and don't complain about being cooked? it's just a "conspiracy theory".
so, there is nothing to worry about 5G but what about when birds start falling from the sky?
@@douglashoward4206 The problem is that real concerns get drowned out in nonsensical ones. This is the one and only time I took the health risk concerns seriously because the overwhelming amount of info I see about the health risks are obviously bunk. Things like 5G causes coronavirus, and the huge panic about cell phones causing cancer before that.
I will always take a calm, objective, scientific, voice way more seriously than some yahoo screaming about 5G in his teeth, or some shit.
Dr. H. thanks so much, my son has been asking me about this since months!
@@SHREDTILLDEAD Where did you get the 1 watt from?
@@SHREDTILLDEAD Haven't you watched the video? First, your 1 Watt for 1 hour for 20 years is BS and BS and BS. Second, a closed box like a microwave traps any electromagnetic waves in a tiny room, while an antenna spreads it widely.
@Jesusfreak Computergeek Nice, that you have so much experience in technology. Unfortunately the second you start to talk about physics and chemistry you are going straight towards the field of pseudoscience. You are a true master in that field as well, as you are able to make utter nonsense sound as if you have something to say.
You are talking about a spin rate. Spin is something related to quantum physics and it that realm your story is complete nonsense as spin has no rate, because it has nothing to do with rotation. A quantum spin can only have an orientation.
If you talk about rotating molecules my question would be whether you made this up or if you have some source you are getting it from. If you have this story from somewhere else it is definitely not a scientific source.
You seem to be saying that microwaves make oxygen molecules rotate in a way they can't be absorbed by the lung. Molecules in gas always rotate more or less. So what is your point? The rotate to fast? If that's your claim, how would microwaves do that? And how would regular light not do the same and even faster? As far as I know I don't suffocate when the light is on.
BTW. I have seen this in other places where pseudoscientists associate quantum spin with rotation.
@Jesusfreak Computergeek It sounds more like you don't understand or you don't know the correct terminology. If you had an understanding of physics you wouldn't use spin in a context where the term is misleading.
Now you switched from spin rate to energy state. What happened to the spin rate? Please point me to an article anywhere in the internet where your "spin rate" is used. Or did you invent that term?
Your words truly are pseudo science and not because the language is not good enough. It is because you just write things that appear to describe a representation of the physical reality, but they really don't.
You use "higher spin rate" and "increased energy state" to refer to something unusual or even dangerous. Please explain in what regard you describe something different than the air simply getting warmer.
@@andarted A closed box w/ reflective walls for waves to bounce around
& a (screened) window where optical waves can leak out (that's how you
see your cat inside !)
Thank for the simple and level handed explinations
Thank you. Your discussion is compelling with facts and painfully relevant questions. I could not stop watching your video until the end. Liked and subscrubed!
You're a wonderful educator, thanks Sabine.
One should point out that in Europe and many other parts of the World the mm band is not used. E.g. the 5G iPhones sold outside of the USA are not including the mm bandwidth. You pointed out correctly that outside the mm band there is no issue. So if you mention attacks against 5G towers in Europe, you could also mention that they are senseless.
this person is amazing. the way she explains is incredible. she talks and it makes sense, even if the topic is complicated. this is clearly the mark of intelligence. she should be an example to all youtubers.
4G is ok for my use, UA-cam with Sabine in max res on my phone. I really dont need more bandwidth for this, rather closer distance.
Seriously, if there is some study or productivity need I am not against 5G, I just doubt there is some current need for 5G for general public. Do those selfdriving cars need 5G?
I realy love her unbiased nature. I see sincereity...
sincerity can come from a lack of information ijs
@@tsquared334 thats not at all what i said...nice try tho. in the spirit of sincerity, acknowledging that you were not, i noted the separation of sincerity and knowledge base. they have nothing to do with each other.
It's common among scientists, which is why I think a bit more attention should be paid in school to how to think rationally. Science is humble.
With this subject and the virus issue, there are generally two sources of info. One from the mainstream (governments following " best medical advice" for example, usually tied up to big pharma), a bit like the army...follow orders or else..loose funding for example; and independent groups and individuals who are aften called whistleblowers.
@@bigfletch8 Cant be a whistleblower....noooooo way. Gotta tow the line for the big guy if you want to make money. Which is fundamentally incorrect because your future can never be certain as long as the guy smiting is the guy paying.
That you Sabine for your presentation. Found your channel today and I'm now a new subscriber. Love science, and also listening to unbiased presentations/discussions on controversial subjects.
I listened to her entire presentation. It was excellent.
Okay, this is the video I will share every time these discussions come up. I will save so much time! Thank you!
I thought the same
Me, too! I immediately shared with five people 👍
I am a physician turned educator. I am a patron of physics. Sabine is a joy to listen to. She is right on the issues and has a nice touch.
I like Sabine's ability to state that she doesn't know (which usually means no-one else does either :) ) and that it should be a time reassess progress and to consider all options, new and old, which is a sign of truly participating in the mode of enquiry called Science.
Once again to the point and concise,we need to get the politicians to answer these very
important thru ordering very intense studies on the possible harm to us before saying yes or no to it’s applications and the public needs to know.Thanks for your extremely valuable breakdown on this matter.Your a very valuable asset to our planet thanks !!!!!!!
What a fantastic insight into a very complicated subject. Thanks Sabine.
The most unbiased video on 5G. Thank you.
I think, if there are not enough tests/research done on 5G effect on human body, it will be very high risk to use them in public applications. It means, there should be more studies done to make sure humans are not affected. Otherwise, the consequences might be irreversible and apocalyptic. What is the use of technology if it harms human health in any way? Businessmen wont understand this.
I concur. I think more studies are needed, and if it proves safe then it should be rolled out.
@@politicalhorizon2000 I don't agree. The raw science suggests that this radiation doesn't have enough energy to damage cells. It could be sensible to roll it out with that understanding and then also do very good research into the long-term effects. The problem is that if we were to always wait for long-term studies of every new technology then we would not progress very fast. If we waited for 10-year to 20-year studies before rolling our radio, flight, power lines, etc. we would still be living like we did in the 1950s today. Since the overall science indicates it should not be possible to damage cells with 5G, roll it out but force good, long-term studies also.
"Know first, use later". History of mankind: " Uh?"
Wisdom: Know first, use later...
Man: Invent profit widgit, profit by it, use profits to protect the investment, repeat.
Knowing the technology doesn't mean knowing the societal implications of the technology. It works, it's safe for the user, and people are willing to buy it at a higher price than it takes for you to make it. That's what it means to know first. As for what it'll do when you release it onto the world, then in most cases, it would be unwise to think that you know what will happen. Every new venture is a surprise.
Strangely enough, it always seems to be that it is the people who don't know much, that claim to know for certain.
(And yes, there is a psychological term for that condition.)
The old saying; "The most dangerous is to know a little, and think it's enough", comes to mind.
If you are scared of something, study it, learn about it, instead of believing anything and everything said that
confirms your fear. Know Thine Enemy...
What we know is plasma effect to water molecule bonds, as demo'ed by mv ovens and John Kanzius (burning water with RF)
Cells consist for most part of confined 4th state structured water
Difference 4th state gellyfied water has never been properly studied
So as long as this has not been properly researched, there nobody with enough knowledge to roll out something that emits 24/7, unless providing for free, sufficient protection gears and measuring devices to each and every person plus relocation compensation to people that want to move eslewhere
Also Mankind . . . " Throw bone at Moon, rain come. No argue, it science. "
This has been by far the most comprehensive and clear explanation I've seen on the matter. Thank you so much for taking the time to make this video
Thank you for explaining it so well.
M.Sc. of chemistry from Germany here: Awesome video! When you mentioned the interaction of photons with molecules and spoke about direct damage by breaking the bonds.... you said that if the energy was not high enough the molecules just wiggle. That's right! And this actually IS a form how molecules 'heat up'. The more the molecule wiggles the "hotter" it gets. I wrote in " because single molecules do not have a temperature.
Humanity - see my vids, read the descriptions
Exciting the outer valence shell of a molecule does not necessarily heat up. That's not how it happens.
@@deadpiratetattoo2015 Heat has hardly anything to do with electrons directly.
@@knutritter461 not true. All chemical reactions are either Endo or ectothermic. The act of exciting the outer valence shell is not the same as replacement or reduction, which does involve ∆. Final edit
@@deadpiratetattoo2015 By definition molecules have no valence shell.... only atoms have it.
And btw: Electrons have 'no mass', better: They have a negligible mass. Whereas other atoms in the molecule do and their inertia is a prerequisite for 'storing' energy.
Excitement of electrons is only important for HIGH temperatures where molecules start ceasing to exist. At common temperatures it is negligible.
I just want to give her a friendly hug of appreciation for her wisdom and honesty. 🤗 Thank you!
The simp is strong with this one.
@@SHREDTILLDEAD _someone compliments a woman_ oMG he'S A SiMP. Do you even know what that means?
I think her videos are great and thinking this doesn't make me a simp. Grow up.
@@Eteriaa It does though.
Please start regarding:
1) FREQUENCY, WAVELENGTH
2) POWER DENSITY
3) RESONANCE, INTERFERENCE, STANDING WAVE-FORMS
4) GROUNDING / ABSORPTION / EMBEDDING / COMPRESSION
5) APPLICATION
6) PULSE, MODULATION, POLARIZATION. DIGITALISATION (you may argument with “RHYTHM”)
7) ELECTROMAGNETIC REALITY AND MIND BENDING “STUFF”
The sympathetic resonance or anharmonic oscillation between proportional frequencies not only transmits energy, but also impulses (information).
We are talking: stress (non-thermal) effects of pulsed microwaves.
*Properties of membranes and voltage-controlled (dependent) ion-channels and crystalline structures (in the human body and synergists including insects, bacteria, etc.) in DNA, membranes, mitochondria, microtubules may be "disrupted".
*In his lectures, Prof. Martin Pall explains how the electrochemical gradient (potential) in cells can be amplified by approximately 7.2 million times due to electromagnetic influences.
*Young tissue has a much higher extracellular water content than older tissue. This leads to a much deeper penetration of the effects (Dr. Devra Davis).
Children have a higher surface to volume ratio, so their tissues are much more exposed to radiation. This makes them more susceptible to radiation.
Children have a brain that is still developing, They have less thick bones (particularly relevant on the head).
*DNA and stem cells are increased in children (studies by Dr. Igor Belyaev)
*Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs "snips") are the most common type of genetic variation in humans. The American Cancer Society (Yale) has shown that such genetic factors make a difference in how and whether different people are more or less susceptible to certain environmental influences, especially cell phone radiation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stuff like:
Wavelength divides evenly into circumference giving rise to two main geometric forms, the octave and the golden ratio.
There is a quasicrystalline(penrose tiling) relationship between the octave and golden ratio (stellated dodeca/icosa)
Geometries based only on the octave produce maximum destructive wave interference.
The golden ratio minimizes destructive interference and maximizes constructive wave interference, because it’s the path to the still point/perfect damping.
The optimal solution to sphere packing (compression to distribution) is in the dodecahedron, twelve spheres of equal volume all meeting/touching one in the center, as opposed to cubic/octave packing.
A 180 degree phase shift between waves is what produces/translates longitudinal waves from transverse waves, through translation of vorticity.
This phase shift is also part of how phase conjugate heterodyning produces self organization and negentropy. Golden ratio optimizes this compression process as described in the solution to the Klein-Gordon equation.
Because golden-ratio optimizes this compression, this entails a generalized solution to maximum constructive wave interference, origin of centripetal forces, origin of negentropy, mass and gravity.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most people cannot cognize “wifi” so here is a compilation (edutainment):
ua-cam.com/video/G2AhqQiquao/v-deo.html
of "REAL LIFE*": recorded pictures and videos and ARTISTIC SIMULATIONs (*TRANSLATIONS, INTERPRETATIONS, AUGMENTED REALITY)
... translating pulsed, polarized, modulated, digital, multiplex ... electromagnetic (microwave = radar) radiation INTO noises, sounds and visual.
I would love to have a talk about the specifics on
*dopamine vs. the physics of electromagnetic reality
* electromagnetic reality and consciousness states
Anything else seems “childish”.
I'd like to give her a good hugging aswell.
Thank you Sabine for this information
Information is power….Thankyou Sabine
Great, informative video. I love your genuine open mindedness, your capacity to separate what is, “science,” from other provinces, such as, “politics,” and your unflustered way of dealing with reality; “The facts, ma’am. Just the facts.” Awesome. And, sadly, rather unique. Popular science dissemination needs more people like you, Sabine.
Humanity - see my vids, read the descriptions
I wholeheartedly agree. I’m so tired of being told when to feel awed by “the fabric of reality” and that I am “made out of e=mc2” - when I was taught that equations describe reality, not the other way around - and how soon we can expect the end of the world, when we will meet other “intelligent life” as though we can call ourselves “intelligent” without stopping to look at the horrific damage we do whenever aliens are encountered here on earth, and so on. The battle for science in the States is not going to be won with swelling orchestral music and other attempts to turn physics into a religion. She isn’t having any of that. The scientific method by definition doesn’t take sides, make blind assumptions or jump to conclusions.
@@lisaschuster686 you appear to be very confused about reality.
As you well said --- it is a decision for politics --- unfortunately, politics only serve big interests --- so for the sake of profit --- we might get sacrificed.
Heheh that sounds about right. But reading your comment made me think, "what is profit?" Most people would think money. Maybe that's right but maybe it's more than that as well
@@malcolmtaylor7074 profit, in my understanding, would be, getting out more assets than you have put into the scheme.
Could be money, knowledge, increased well-being or more satisfaction whatever makes you tick.
Yes,Jacques…you are correct!🥺
There’s a flaw in that logic, how do those that “profit” avoid (pernicious?) radiation? They share the same space as their “victims” they are not going to walk round in lead lines suits are they?
Sensible comment.
Another informative, engaging, and entertaining video, Sabine. Thank you for raising the common sense bar!
Thank you Sabine for adding additional information regarding the negative health effects of 5G technology. I’ve seen other information regarding this subject material and will be enjoying your information as well later. I’ve saved your video for later viewing.
When I worked at a radio facility in the military we would often find dead birds around our microwave antennas, they would sit on or near the antenna’s likely enjoying the extra heat right up until it cooked them....
Of course you would find dead birds around the area with that power.
Did you know AM stations that are 100,000 Watts kill birds too?
The power levels emitted from military communications and radar sites are many, many decimal orders of magnitude greater than what we’re talking about here! (ETR2, USN ‘66-‘70).
Decades back, soldiers noticed the lobe of melted snow in front of microwave dishes and went there for warmth. The Army had to put up signs warning against irradiating one’s sperm to discourage the practice.
@@rdavis184 But I have no desire to sit on these antennas. I doubt the heat is even noticeable when you're standing on ground level a few dozen meters away.
@@northsouthpaw Yeah it's about power levels. When the anti 5G mob sells scaremongering like "the military uses it as a weapon", it makes me scream inside. I like to reply, then stop drinking water cos riot police disperse crowds with water cannon.
Sabine's explanations are always excellent. She's one of those rarities: when she doesn't know something, she says so. I have great confidence in her intelligence and judgement.
*direct phase array, beam-forming, mm waveform penetrance, fortran, fourier transform.*
I had a small business in Dublin from 1972 - 2019 until I retired. One of my clients was a man from Castle Blaney in the county of Monaghan. He told me he had visited his home town frequently and the last time he was there he saw his old friend had upgraded his transport to carry his milk to the local creamery and from one can to two. He had bought a new opal astra estate. His old transport had been an ass & cart. He commented that if Eowny Murtagh could upgrade his transport to that extent doubling his output that there must be something good about joining the EU. I think I will start looking for a donkey & cart now that I,m retired.
Very useful, thanks. 'Background in telecom and IT, I agree - health impact needs more study before implementing it.
They did study it in the 1970s Russia declassified their 5g info it's somewhere on the net and Russia does not use 5g on its people like the west does they know what it does to our bodies...
@The Bumble Bee without it the fourth industrial revolution would be impossible
pharos.stiftelsen-pharos.org/global-goals-and-the-global-reset-for-global-technological-control/#more-2822
Look how they rushed that deadly poke with no concern for human life so they'll roll it out when they're damn good and ready and everyone can suck it up like everything else. Bastards
@The Bumble Bee I agree and I suspect it has something to do with activating the IoT and transhumanism - which somehow involves the graphine oxide in the jabbbb. Will have to wait and see.
Humanity - see my vids, read the descriptions
Well... this is unexpected. I was firmly in the “5G skeptics are all insane” camp. 😅 Thank you for the unbiased information!
Do you see how you ignorance of the issue made you a danger to the righteousness of the educated on the subject !?
Humbled I hope as well as educated 👍
Yeahhhh I suppose. However I don’t consider myself an expert on almost anything. I stay humble for this reason. I changed my mind because it was open for change.
@@auntjenifer7774 ehhh kinda iffy the super skeptic are kinda uneducated as well, I’m a light skeptic
@@auntjenifer7774 most of the super skeptics are retarded non physicists that think google can replace decades of research and theorizing
The video was basically ... to be continued
Many thanks Dr. Hossenfelder for providing your summary & simplified explanation.
*_TRUST !!_*
Thanks. I never knew so many details.
This is the best explanation of 5G I have ever seen!!!
I was troubled with 3G and 4G intrusions (facial recog.,spying, voting, foreign hackers etc). With 5G it's now possible for a Fussian to know when my bills are due and how I voted just by walking my dog.
@@dwighthawkins5955 Fussian? Like, from France?
The problem is not technology it's self, you wouldn't ban knifes for example because with them someone can kill you, as also can cut a slice of bread, it is the use of technology and the legislation that has to follow in order for that use to be for good and not evil... Unfortunately legislation comes very slow and corruption in politics is present all over the place. We just have to learn our rights and vote for them who will defend them. And also keep watching Sabine and stay informed !
@@ronrendon No. It's my way of skirting around political correctness. I did not want to offend the many Gussians that are living among us.
@@dimitriskaraiskos8559 Sometimes a new angle will appear amid "fast and more reliable technology". Today, at breakfast (retail Denny's), a long line to pay at the register started a unique discussion about how technology has slowed things down so very very much. So how much slower is cashier 5G gonna take us? Dr. Sabine has helped me through more math and Quantum dilemmas than I can count. I think its ok to discuss 5G social ramifications while standing 8 deep at any given retail checkout stand.
Wow, I learned so much from this video. The information was concise and to the point. Thank you so much for sharing.
More research needed!
Well I think, you're an amazing teacher.
Thank you Sabine for explaining how 5g works and possible effects it can have on humans. I have listened to others, not really getting anything out of it. You did a wonderful job.
I'm a lay-person with an ability to understand scientific perspective. I appreciate this so much. It was clear to me and the link came from friends who ARE scientists in this area. I'm posting for nervous friends.
given what you're writing about yourself: subscribe! (if not yet done so) :-) she's brilliant.
That was very helpful Sabine. I thought you were very even-handed in your presentation of the cautionary factors without being an alarming. 😀👍
U r very comprehensive i appreciate ur synopsis. First principally thinking has led me to believe that u r not sure either. Ty for your candor.
the first video i watched for sabine dates years ago concerning the fundamental nature of light ...in this video like her first video, she is always clear, thoughtful and engaging ...
I live in Norway. No sun for moths. So mabye I can get some heat from 5G during the winter.
Hahah...!))
That is what Putin said about global warming: it will be good to need fewer winter coats.
@@wolfgangk2824 Was meant more ironically since we are bombarded by similar and even more harmful radiation from the Sun.
@@KenJohansen Can you get a suntan in Norway?
@@raymondfrye5017 Yes we can. In the summer the sun shine almost 24 houres 🙂
Great post. Learned me a lot. Thx!
Amazing explanation. Ty
To quote Allan H. Frey, discoverer of the microwave hearing effect (discovered all the way back in the 60, after Radar techs doing maintenance work in front of active antennas started reporting hearing clicking & buzzing noises) from a very hard to find Usenet mail thread in 1996:
"There is a microwave hearing effect that occurs at very low power densities and a skull vibration effect that occurs when very high energies are applied to the head. There is some confusion in the literature because the vibration effect has often been referred to as a microwave hearing effect, but it is not the same phenomena."
In one of these two cases, we're talking about power densities as low as 0.1 mW/cm² of pulsed microwave radiation here, with further dependence on the pulse repetition frequency and the peak power densities (~300 mW/cm²). The right combination of these parameters suffices to cause local thermoelastic expansion of brain tissue without raising global mean brain temperature. This expansion then leads into an acoustic pressure wave detected by the hair cells of the organ of Corti inside the cochlea audible even while exposed to ambient noise levels of around 65 dB.
(Which btw. makes the Mythbusters episode where they 'debunked'/'busted' the microwave hearing effect a total sham, they didn't match EITHER of these conditions. Additionally, Frey originally experimented in the 200-3000 MHz range, they used a 4.7 GHz dish if I recall correctly, and didn't match any of the other parameters above either).
For the other effect, well, check the literature yourself.
But to further quote Frey, from www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32648/title/Opinion--Cell-Phone-Health-Risk-/ in 2012:
"… For example, after my colleagues and I published in 1975 that exposure to very weak microwave radiation opens the regulatory interface known as the blood brain barrier (bbb), a critical protection for the brain, the Brooks AFB group selected a contractor to supposedly replicate our experiment. For 2 years, this contractor presented data at scientific conferences stating that microwave radiation had no effect on the bbb. After much pressure from the scientific community, he finally revealed that he had not, in fact, replicated our work. We had injected dye into the femoral vein of lab rats after exposure to microwaves and observed the dye in the brain within 5 minutes. The Brooks contractor had stuck a needle into the animals’ bellies and sprayed the dye onto their intestines. Thus it is no surprise that when he looked at the brain 5 minutes later, he did not see any dye; the dye had yet to make it into the circulatory system. …"
Much of Frey's research (itself quite often funded by the DoD) was suppressed in manners similar to the above to safeguard advanced radar technology during the cold war. Personally I really don't think there's any big conspiracy to actually CoNtRoL MiNdS, but I do think a lot of people want to escape responsibilities for the consequences of suppressing research like that in the interests of nAtIoNaL SeCuRiTy. Sure, doing so may have very well saved lives in the short run, but… Well, feel free to draw your own conclusions about how to end that sentence.
Aw gee com'on; You order the $19.95 Space ray cannon from Pulp Fiction and the world is yours!!! Everyone wants to rule the world until they find out how difficult it is · DDNI Wiley does not sell Boiling Frogs despite claims to the contrary
Thank you for this video. As a former industrial radiographer I have always been careful with radiation exposure, and am well versed in the differences. However trying to explain concerns for this untested implementation has been difficult and I plan on sharing your link with people who have asked me.
I think this is most simple decision to make. Just ask government officials who in charge of this will they be the cute little lab mouse tell us is safe or not.
@@derrickmcadoo3804 The reason he was careful is because IONISING radiation is dangerous. The radio spectrum is NON ionising, so its a completely different story. Why are you not more afraid to walk out in the sunlight than of radio waves? I have climbed live LORAN-C towers, with 250kW pulses. According to conspiracists I probably should have been fried or dead? :) :)
Irrational fear is a part of being human I guess, but knowledge should keep us from hiding in the basement.
Except it is fully tested and been in use for decades, if you were a radiographer how is it you don't understand the difference between ionising and non-ionising radiation? Very suspicious.
@@QuantumFengShui it's safe, well tested and been in use for decades.
We are swimming in radioactive soup and it will have consequences beyond imagination, like Covid-19.
Your intellectual dexterity is amazing
I lived through an event where I took residence for one night in the Days Inn in Milpitas, California. I was assigned a room directly below a 5G tower, which resides directly above the center of the building. I was sick as a dog all night and I was barely able to walk to the bathroom to get sick, my equilibrium was so distorted. I was sweating, and, yes, after hearing your presentation, I can attest completely truthfully that I felt like I was in a microwave oven. I was terrified because I thought that my regular taxi driver that was to pick me up in the morning would think that I had Covid and would not let me get into his cab. Dear people, I have no reason to lie about this. This one night in this hotel almost killed me. I truly wish this was not true. But it is true. I am a living witness.
Personally, I really believe you. But I also must say that 6 years ago I changed home. In that home there was a dog and a little metalic table. When I got there, just one day was enough to felt terrible sick, I thought I was about to die. Later I recovered and I was living there for 3 months without other problem. The point is that if I would be living there just 1 or 2 days and then leave, I could say that I got sick because of home, maybe because of the dog or the table there, or some spirit. People wouldn't believe any of those theories, but I would be 100% sure that the home had something bad, but actually it could be another different reasons.
@@gatoangora4661 get an EMF meter. I KNOW EMPERICALLY. I lived it.
Hi Sabine, Thank you very much for the clarity that you have brought to bear on this very important subject. I think most people can easily understand your brilliant presentation!
You speak clearly, concisely, with perfect timing and on topic , consistently,
So easy to easy to understand, and I am no rocket science.
Cheers, & Thank You.
as clear and condensed a delivery of such information as i have had the good pleasure to be exposed to - a summary of the salient points and lean or free of emotional or personal hype. thank you -
This is the first video I was willing to see in this topic. She addresses the topic totally cool, I tend to listen to her. Now it was 2 years ago, I wonder if a relevant study is at least commenced since.
Thank you for such a scientific approach on a very cluttered subject.
Happy you find it useful!
Doctor "but" Sabine :-), I like your explanations because you are pure logical sense, pure science. Not a bit of unwarranted faith. Thank you for share it.
How would you know? I'm not disagreeing, I'm just suggesting to be less confident in your ability to recognize it "the truth".
@@okdoomer620 He didn't mention 'truth'.
But even then, trust, which is still tricky, but slightly different from faith, given that scientific facts can be tested again for confirmation.
It's not affordable to do experiments every single time we watch another of her videos, so trust her :)
It is alright as long as you don't use it as a source for a formal paper.
You are very helpful to the public. Thanks.
My Prius car made me sick. In 2012, I had a brand new Prius, I noticed it was hard to concentrate, it made me very tired and my kids riding in the back were wiped out after going on trips of 1-2 hours. I was also getting like beams of energy directed at my legs, I develop hard skin spots in my legs and the lack of concentrations increased. One day I was running out of gas and put it in the saving mode running more on the electric and was like a shock to my system I actually had to pull over and turn the car off.
Needless to say I barely used the car and return it when my lease was up. The hard skin areas in my legs took time to dissolve and that was the first and last I drive a hybrid or electric car.
Thank you. You are my new physics teacher. I only tripped over your channel recently, but I am permanently hooked. I appreciate the no-sensationalism, non-bullsh*t presentation, and even on the subjects where I can follow maybe 1/3 of what you are actually telling us (I did great on my sole physics class in telecom...but not THAT great) I can hang in there long enough to find the parts I can follow. Also, your coronavirus song was a scream😂.
Balanced, documented report from a person who knows what she is talking about.
Save that 5G is utterly useless for ordinary people. It is but a commercial thrust, and as such is unwelcomed.
@@clmasse I'm not so sure about that. Even now, it's actually needed to stream virtual reality games wirelessly. There's a significant performance difference when using the Virtual Desktop app with a Quest 2 to connect to your PC on the 2.4 GHz band vs. the 5 GHz band, due to the high bandwidth demand of this setup.
@@clmasse As I understand it, 5G will enable a multitude of new web applications, many of which haven't even been dreamed of.
Having all your personal data on solid state drives in your home and having near-instantaneous access to them from miles away will be a game changer. It would be like having terabytes of storage on your phone.
To use an analogy, if the CPUs that we use are like racing cars the current data highways are like dirt roads.
@@nagualdesign No, it will enable nothing. Already the existing applications require much more ressources than necessary. When they are abundant, no effort is done. If they become scarse, better designed application will follow. Images and sounds already surpass our sensory capabilities.
.
Solid state drives are so light that you can carry them with you, like a wallet. It is only a commercial argument without any foundation.
.
And there remains the question as whether all that is useful. The answer is to figure out what is really useful for *us* and not only for business. The obvious answer is peace, job, and a clean Earth, the 5G is detrimental to all.
@@clmasse Surely you must accept that it will enable _something,_ and that _some_ effort is made by developers to do more with less? I can't speak for everyone, but as someone who's been programming computers for over 35 years and designing websites for nearly 20 years I can tell you that optimization accounts for a significant proportion of my work.
Having said that, there are indeed an inordinate number of websites where the page contents load quickly thanks to the efforts of developers but the browser is left hanging due to all the advertising that's tacked on without much care.
Thanks for your well crafted videos, your expertise, and your sense of humor! You pick great topics, too. I look forward to more of your work!
Thank you for the nice lecture.