What if thereward for victories and defeats directly depended on the length of the match. The fewer turns you make, the less experience for the Rewards Track you get, and vice versa. Thus, it will not matter at all which deck you choose. Aggressive decks will gain as much experience as control decks. What do you think of this idea? All the facts about Rewards Track 👉 ua-cam.com/video/pWBnKiMbVsM/v-deo.html
Hey HS Math, I have been following your channel and method to stay f2p for a while now, I usually save up gold for the whole expansion and get to 6-8k gold by the time a new expac is released, spend it all on new packs and repeat. However, with the upcoming changes I'm not sure if it's the right way to go since we will earn packs from the new progression system, and there is a need to save some gold for the mini set that will be released later. Could you give us your input on the right way to go to stay f2p with the upcoming expansion? Thank you so much for your holy work, you changed me from a mindless fiend that buys a pack every time he has 100 gold to a responsible adult. Keep it up!!
Hey, I noticed you guys used the lower winrate version of token druid, as the version Solem had created had around a 75% winrate and included lighting bloom
HS Math: The new legendary cards are powerful and will form brand new archtypes. HS ladder after new exp: Face Hunter, Aggro Rogue, Tempo Mage and Rush Demon-Hunter
I don't really care what's in the new expansion, all I want is Yogg... I've already been saving up gold and dust to craft the new Yogg so I can play double Yogg in wild :D
I have a mage deck that focuses on drawing your deck with super cheap spells. I have freeze cards to stall and simulacrum to copy my only minion in deck, Yogg haha. It's super trolly
Guys, I really want you to remember.what playing is about: having fun. And if you are not having fun, it's a job or a choir. At that point you should get a better pay than 36g/h and perhaps priced in something that could get you food if you ever get hungry.
It's easy, first you craft Barnes and Gruul, king of the ghouls Then play Barnes, summon a the blood of the ancient one, shadowstep Barnes, play him again, summon another, then you get THE 🅱️ANCIENT ONE Dont know if you'll become rich but will conquer the world, trust me I have a PhD
@@Ryzoslaw Cloning a euckaryotic cell doesn't exactly yield a perfect genetic replica, as the mitochondrial DNA in the zygote comes from the ovum donor. An exception to this would be if hypothetically both the donor of the egg and the nucleic DNA were the same subject (a fertile female or zwitterion)
My tip: play casual mode instead of ranked. Lot of people including me play it to complete daily quest ( like play 30 murlocs) or just play for fun decks.
Some years ago I created a second HS account to do my quests more easily and quickly by challenging myself. It is really effective because I technically have twice as much gold as only one account (one is used for standard and meta decks, the other for wild and fun decks). But now I play less because whenever I play HS, it is for farming and not for playing the actual game. I am still interested by the game but not as much as the last five years. I also always like you vids, keep up the good work ;)
For anyone interested in wild: don't believe the win%, because hsreplay sucks balls when it comes to anything that isn't standard. Odd pala is a low tier 2-3 deck, simultaneously worse and far slower than discolock or aggro druid.
I am a returning player who recently crafted odd pally and I have to say that it is one of the most effective decks that I have ever played. Went from bronze 10 to diamond 5 in few days and I'm pretty sure I am going to hit legend this season. It's not THE best deck on the ladder, but it's definitely something between tier 1 and tier 2.
Hearthstone not a routine? Log in each day to get your 50-60g, then log off because there is no gold reward for playing any longer. I liked the well-timed "Time to pay".
I think there should be some reward for losing. In one non-card game, you got experience if you died 3 times in a row, which I think is fair because that meant you still got something for playing
I always thought that XP should be tied to a number of factors, and not just the number of turns. It should be impacted by the number of cards played, amount of mana spent, and amount of damage dealt. Long games naturally get more XP per game, but aggro decks can farm multiple games faster- overall it makes sense that their XP gain should be roughly equal.
I also reroll every 50 gold quest to go for 60 and above, rarely hitting the above, but hitting 60 most of the time. I shoot for 100 total gold per day, but fall short a lot. Shrug.
Crunching numbers is infinitely different than the application of said theory. Ask yourselves honestly, without quests, have you ever gotten 30 coins an hour or whatever it was? It’s just not practical. The purpose of math is to make things more practical. Not to analyze data until it becomes a convoluted mess. You’re quite literally taking the extreme end of the bell curve and promoting it as, “well it’s theoretically possible, therefore everyone can do it!” It’s disingenuous. I doubt you’ve even done it yourself. And even if you were able to do it, it wouldn’t be any fun. Every one of your videos is a reminder why I unsubscribed.
As far as one-shot methods go, don't forget to set up an Arena draft at no more than 2 losses before Darkmoon launches. You should get a free entry ticket when Arena rotates, and the usual Arena prizes. Always a good step to complete if you want to max out on the easiest-to-get resources. Also as mentioned by Mathematics, reminder to have all your Daily Quests cleared by the 12th as they may be getting deleted (i.e. if you're like me and tend to keep one Quest on the list for refreshing)
It might sound like a meme but I crashed through wild mode last month all the way to ~3000 legend playing odd shaman. The games are quick and it has a decent winrate vs reno priest and odd paladin since you just pick spell damage totem every time and point face with your lightning bolts and totemic smashes.
@@zenjubo9884 Wrong actually though. The legend of today is far easier than the legend of the past. It used to be much more difficult, and only about 2,000 people got it per month (standard) and for wild a couple hundred. Now it's more like 50,000, because the no star bonus part is far shorter, and star bonuses get people to that no star bonus faster too. It's just a lot easier nowadays.
@@kaimurphy4409 All their videos these days seem like rant after rant about rewards not being enough and that nobody should bother wasting their time on the game. It's depressing. It seems they actually hate Hearthstone at this point
Great video! Yes experience for losses is important! It keep players playing even if they are on a loss streak, it should be LESS than winning though! Especially if it is a battle pass system! That way you feel you are always making progress. One of the reasons I disliked HOTS is all their special events stated "in winning games" this literally made the game not fun and the community toxic and everyone was try harding for wins (unlike LOL which usually gave you progress win or lose). In casual friendly games their should to rewarded on the battlepass win or lose. The competitive rewards are already in the game in the form of ranked rewards. As for XP points based on time in game I agree half with your statement. You should get a flat EXP amount for winning PLUS an amount for the turn count. This way both aggro and control decks can make a similar amount of EXP, I would hate to see a meta where it is turn 20 control meta to optimize EXP gain!
I don't like the idea of experience linked to lenght of play. Control decks would be everywhere! Maybe after a set number of turns, the experience would decrease slightly over time ? Also, I like the idea to gain experience if you lose, but I think much less than a win.
Why? It's not like they're advocating for an exponential increase in experience the longer it goes on. For aggro, you just play more games in the same amount of time, generally (hopefully) getting the same amount of experience. This is not even accounting for a potential bonus on wins and losses
CASUAL! If you want to just farm gold - play Casual! HS mathematics recommend losing/conceding now and then to tank your MMR and get easier matches. This clearly indicate that there is no secondary gold of climbing and since losing takes time, it reduced gold per hour. Just play casual, you still get 10 gold per 3 wins and the added bonus that people are much more likely to concede or play fun/bad decks or decks they do not know well, so it increases your win rate and decreases your game length. I like the content and the deck recommendations are seems solid, but they missed on game mode!
That is a big part of arena, it's not about making gold, it's for gaining resources more efficiently. Going 3wins gets you all 150 gold back in the form of 1 pack and dust/extra gold. Anything more gets you more rewards but only 7 will net you more gold itself
playing arena is not a good idea if you want to get more gold , but you usually want gold to buy packs. Every arena run you get a pack and you pay 150 gold. so you need to win at least 50 gold . To get 50 gold you need 3-4 wins which is doable. If you play 1-2 runs every 3 days , with the daily and weekly missions you can have enough gold to sustain yourself if your average around 5-6 which is doable for good players (while getting a lot of packs).
A major problem with the big xp on victories with control decks, is that if I lose, would I make the big xp/gold on the equivalent in aggro losses? May as well play aggro decks to get a higher reward anyways
7:41 That deck is no joke; I just won at least 15 casual games in a row with it (I wasn’t counting at the start). Over half of them were done by turn 4. Farming the daily max of 100 gold will only take you an hour to an hour and a half if you play that deck.
Play Wild. I am farming a lot of Gold and Dust just playing there. Since there are cheaper decks, you don't need spend a lot of resources to gain Gold and Dust. Most decks needs 1 or 3 Legendaries.cards.
Hi dude. I liked your vid so much! You are sorta like Vennori. He is the sickest content creator on UA-cam and he always hit records every time. Go check his page out and give the gamer a like! 👉 #VennoriPlaysLegion
I would suggest not crafting anything that is epic or legendaries card, since expansion is almost here. Btw, kind of funny that blizzard has not told what the rewards are going to be and how exp is going to be distributed so you know how much time its going to take to unlock everything, it cant be good.
i think the only way for Blizzard to balance the game because i dont agree that the new system will be a benefit for us, is to open a site that we can sell our double or more same cards we open in packs to the new players that dont have cards, like yugioh..we buy cards and we make our money back, why blizzard is not doing it? this can help you bring more people into the game, no people sad, we help you and you help us, fair enough
Well... i climbed from Diamon 5 to legend in 4 hours with heal zoolock and at the beggining of the season from bronze 10 to diamond 10 with soul galakrond warlock almost 200g in 2 days + legend rank
Xp for losing, huh. I'd like that since it helps weak/fun decks see play but it would have to be very little to not be the main source of income. If 100 is what you got from a win, a defeat should be worth 5.
I don't think the length of matches should affect the amount of xp earned. All it would do is encourage roping every turn. Additionally, I already use a meme deck that could abuse this by forcibly extending the length of matches. It's a shudderwock combo that prevents both of us from fatiguing, heals us both, makes their spells unplayable, summons and kills all their minions, and gives me armor. The only ways out are to wait 40 turns for a tie, conceed and sit through 10 minutes of animations before it goes through, or to quit the game. Won't be a big deal to me, I could just play pokemon or read a book while the animations play out but it would be a waste of time for the opponent. I don't think it would be a good idea for the developers to encourage this terrorizing of the lower ranks.
If the reward depended on the match time length, you incentivize players who do a "roping strategy" - which makes the game super aggravating and not fun to play at all.
Is not be there an achievement or even reward for completing a set (collecting all cards of an expansion) ? I've completed scholomance and the game don't even noticed me. WTH...
Just to note that when leveling characters to get basic cards, we DO get exp on defeats. So losses should give a lower percentage of experience for the Reward Track, but not an overwhelming one (like, say, 75% of a victory).
After every expansion that is released I start doing quests and save for the next one. I have 5k gold for this upcoming expansion and thats with missing one or two quests. 50 packs for the new expansion everyone should do this.
1:12 I voted in that and at the time i was at 100. But my tradition is to start saving gold when i saw the first trailer and since then i have more than 1000
You might consider doing a video on "how to be successful in hearthstone" I have played since Beta, I currently have 10400 gold, three strong decks, paladin, hunter and warlock. I usually open 40-50 packs on an expansion release. I was able to rank diamond 10 with a few hours total gameplay time over the entire month every month. Usually I get diamond 5, but didn't really want to spend the additional time this month and didn't feel it was worth it. I often will log in for a short while now and then, but at least once every three days for about thirty minutes or less to do all the dailies. I will often throw away a 60 gold daily if it does not match the others for a 50 gold one, to reduce games and time I need to play which I feel is more valuable then 10 gold. I almost always use tavern brawl to do them all. I especially like when I do not have to build a deck or supply anything, those work the best. Unless you are an Esports player, trying to go for a very high legend rank, I actually believe this is perfectly acceptable to being "successful" About 95% of all the free available rewards around or less than 10 hours of play in a month. So in summary, you do not need a full collection, or even all the useful cards of a rotation to be successful, just enough of them to craft three or so very strong decks. You can even just make one deck period, a little more boring, but that works too. They are used to get to diamond 10 or 5 and honestly nothing more. Almost any deck can do that actually, because of the star rank system. But it is a bit more efficient when you do win constantly, and you don't really get bored with them as you only play them for a short time. Maybe around 4-9 hours total in an entire month. I might play more when they add the battlepass, I enjoy battlegrounds and other things more than standard, but at the moment they just waste time and have no value other than fun of play. I very much like the idea I can play any mode and get rewarded for my time. Will have to see what resources are required for other modes, as other than duels your collection so far does not seem to matter too much for them. Another curiousity, to me I feel the more casual I play the game, the cheaper it is to actually play.
does rank affect in classic mode?, i'm currently diamond in wild mode, so is it harder to win in classic because i'm diamond and my opponent probably has the same skill as me?
What if thereward for victories and defeats directly depended on the length of the match. The fewer turns you make, the less experience for the Rewards Track you get, and vice versa. Thus, it will not matter at all which deck you choose. Aggressive decks will gain as much experience as control decks. What do you think of this idea?
All the facts about Rewards Track 👉 ua-cam.com/video/pWBnKiMbVsM/v-deo.html
Hey HS Math, I have been following your channel and method to stay f2p for a while now, I usually save up gold for the whole expansion and get to 6-8k gold by the time a new expac is released, spend it all on new packs and repeat. However, with the upcoming changes I'm not sure if it's the right way to go since we will earn packs from the new progression system, and there is a need to save some gold for the mini set that will be released later. Could you give us your input on the right way to go to stay f2p with the upcoming expansion?
Thank you so much for your holy work, you changed me from a mindless fiend that buys a pack every time he has 100 gold to a responsible adult. Keep it up!!
I think players would use it to abuse way of getting exp and even build decks around it. If its not perfectly balanced.
Hey, I noticed you guys used the lower winrate version of token druid, as the version Solem had created had around a 75% winrate and included lighting bloom
Instead of saying beware of winstreaks, why not just recommend to play Casual mode (wild)?
@@TheDoubin Thanks. I will definitely make a video on this topic:]
HS Math: The new legendary cards are powerful and will form brand new archtypes.
HS ladder after new exp: Face Hunter, Aggro Rogue, Tempo Mage and Rush Demon-Hunter
Hearthstones not a routine *now* but its about to be
I don't really care what's in the new expansion, all I want is Yogg... I've already been saving up gold and dust to craft the new Yogg so I can play double Yogg in wild :D
I have a mage deck that focuses on drawing your deck with super cheap spells. I have freeze cards to stall and simulacrum to copy my only minion in deck, Yogg haha. It's super trolly
When is the new yogg coming out
It's really nice that there's been nerfing happening more often. I've gotten thousands of dust as free2play just from that in the past 6 or so months.
Guys, I really want you to remember.what playing is about: having fun. And if you are not having fun, it's a job or a choir.
At that point you should get a better pay than 36g/h and perhaps priced in something that could get you food if you ever get hungry.
It's easy, first you craft Barnes and Gruul, king of the ghouls
Then play Barnes, summon a the blood of the ancient one, shadowstep Barnes, play him again, summon another, then you get
THE 🅱️ANCIENT ONE
Dont know if you'll become rich but will conquer the world, trust me I have a PhD
:]
mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell
@@Ryzoslaw Cloning a euckaryotic cell doesn't exactly yield a perfect genetic replica, as the mitochondrial DNA in the zygote comes from the ovum donor. An exception to this would be if hypothetically both the donor of the egg and the nucleic DNA were the same subject (a fertile female or zwitterion)
Recommends smurfing with aggro decks. Bot Mathematician: "I don't feel anything".
:]
4:46 Lol I totally didn't expect such advice.
:]
I am lvl 16 now and it's getting very difficult to progress..
My tip: play casual mode instead of ranked. Lot of people including me play it to complete daily quest ( like play 30 murlocs) or just play for fun decks.
Honestly I'd rather spend some money on the next expansion and spend my time in the game playing decks I enjoy.
Waste of time hearthstone is.
Some years ago I created a second HS account to do my quests more easily and quickly by challenging myself. It is really effective because I technically have twice as much gold as only one account (one is used for standard and meta decks, the other for wild and fun decks). But now I play less because whenever I play HS, it is for farming and not for playing the actual game. I am still interested by the game but not as much as the last five years.
I also always like you vids, keep up the good work ;)
I dont have any problems i play basic cards only
For anyone interested in wild: don't believe the win%, because hsreplay sucks balls when it comes to anything that isn't standard. Odd pala is a low tier 2-3 deck, simultaneously worse and far slower than discolock or aggro druid.
not THAT bad but positive wr at least
I have 67% winrate with odd paly from 64 games.
@@kasparsupenieks8873 at what rank?
I am a returning player who recently crafted odd pally and I have to say that it is one of the most effective decks that I have ever played. Went from bronze 10 to diamond 5 in few days and I'm pretty sure I am going to hit legend this season. It's not THE best deck on the ladder, but it's definitely something between tier 1 and tier 2.
@@konradrohlfs6250 D5
Hearthstone not a routine? Log in each day to get your 50-60g, then log off because there is no gold reward for playing any longer. I liked the well-timed "Time to pay".
What did you DO?! Every single deck I have played against for the past 10 games has been aggro druid. WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?!?!?!
I think there should be some reward for losing. In one non-card game, you got experience if you died 3 times in a row, which I think is fair because that meant you still got something for playing
Quit hearthstone boys, it is not worth it anymore. If you are f2p you are the product (the ones that are being farmed upon by p2w)
I always thought that XP should be tied to a number of factors, and not just the number of turns. It should be impacted by the number of cards played, amount of mana spent, and amount of damage dealt. Long games naturally get more XP per game, but aggro decks can farm multiple games faster- overall it makes sense that their XP gain should be roughly equal.
Instructions unclear. Hearthstone is a routine, not a fun game ok
Get a side job and earn $15/hr which is equivalent to 1300 gold per hour lol
I also reroll every 50 gold quest to go for 60 and above, rarely hitting the above, but hitting 60 most of the time. I shoot for 100 total gold per day, but fall short a lot. Shrug.
5 hours for 40 dust... Didn't realise it was that terrible.
We should all boycott hearthstone. They would have no choice but to make it cheaper
well, if you're going to sell your soul by playing agroo for gold, at least do it right and play casual haha
I haven't had that Play A Friend quest for over 3 months now. I used to get it once per month but this year I only get it twice.
Crunching numbers is infinitely different than the application of said theory. Ask yourselves honestly, without quests, have you ever gotten 30 coins an hour or whatever it was? It’s just not practical.
The purpose of math is to make things more practical. Not to analyze data until it becomes a convoluted mess. You’re quite literally taking the extreme end of the bell curve and promoting it as, “well it’s theoretically possible, therefore everyone can do it!” It’s disingenuous. I doubt you’ve even done it yourself. And even if you were able to do it, it wouldn’t be any fun.
Every one of your videos is a reminder why I unsubscribed.
Why did you subscribe to a math channel if you dislike crunching numbers?
As far as one-shot methods go, don't forget to set up an Arena draft at no more than 2 losses before Darkmoon launches. You should get a free entry ticket when Arena rotates, and the usual Arena prizes. Always a good step to complete if you want to max out on the easiest-to-get resources.
Also as mentioned by Mathematics, reminder to have all your Daily Quests cleared by the 12th as they may be getting deleted (i.e. if you're like me and tend to keep one Quest on the list for refreshing)
It might sound like a meme but I crashed through wild mode last month all the way to ~3000 legend playing odd shaman. The games are quick and it has a decent winrate vs reno priest and odd paladin since you just pick spell damage totem every time and point face with your lightning bolts and totemic smashes.
3000 legend for wild is pretty bad.
@@SuperYtc1 legend is legend
@@zenjubo9884 Wrong actually though. The legend of today is far easier than the legend of the past. It used to be much more difficult, and only about 2,000 people got it per month (standard) and for wild a couple hundred. Now it's more like 50,000, because the no star bonus part is far shorter, and star bonuses get people to that no star bonus faster too. It's just a lot easier nowadays.
@@SuperYtc1 "back in my day legend was EARNED. now these damn ungratefull youngsters get it for free! HS was better in the old days"
@@hinamiravenroot7162 You are quoting yourself there as you are the only person who has said that.
Farming gold is easy, but not buying packs after you have 100g is veeeery hard
commenting to show increased interaction for the algooo
Yeah lets make everyone feel like Hearthstone is cheating and stealing from them.
@@liamwalton4183 ?
@@kaimurphy4409 All their videos these days seem like rant after rant about rewards not being enough and that nobody should bother wasting their time on the game. It's depressing. It seems they actually hate Hearthstone at this point
@@liamwalton4183 well it's a math channel. And mathematically hearthstone is the worst tcg if you wanna get value
Thanks to the Bruce Campbell goblin for holding up the coin sign.
Great video! Yes experience for losses is important! It keep players playing even if they are on a loss streak, it should be LESS than winning though! Especially if it is a battle pass system! That way you feel you are always making progress.
One of the reasons I disliked HOTS is all their special events stated "in winning games" this literally made the game not fun and the community toxic and everyone was try harding for wins (unlike LOL which usually gave you progress win or lose). In casual friendly games their should to rewarded on the battlepass win or lose. The competitive rewards are already in the game in the form of ranked rewards.
As for XP points based on time in game I agree half with your statement. You should get a flat EXP amount for winning PLUS an amount for the turn count. This way both aggro and control decks can make a similar amount of EXP, I would hate to see a meta where it is turn 20 control meta to optimize EXP gain!
I don't like the idea of experience linked to lenght of play. Control decks would be everywhere! Maybe after a set number of turns, the experience would decrease slightly over time ? Also, I like the idea to gain experience if you lose, but I think much less than a win.
Why? It's not like they're advocating for an exponential increase in experience the longer it goes on. For aggro, you just play more games in the same amount of time, generally (hopefully) getting the same amount of experience. This is not even accounting for a potential bonus on wins and losses
Thanks for informatión , Excellent channel, keep it up, a hug from Chile
Thanks :]
@@HearthstoneMathematics
CASUAL! If you want to just farm gold - play Casual!
HS mathematics recommend losing/conceding now and then to tank your MMR and get easier matches.
This clearly indicate that there is no secondary gold of climbing and since losing takes time, it reduced gold per hour.
Just play casual, you still get 10 gold per 3 wins and the added bonus that people are much more likely to concede or play fun/bad decks or decks they do not know well, so it increases your win rate and decreases your game length.
I like the content and the deck recommendations are seems solid, but they missed on game mode!
That is a big part of arena, it's not about making gold, it's for gaining resources more efficiently. Going 3wins gets you all 150 gold back in the form of 1 pack and dust/extra gold. Anything more gets you more rewards but only 7 will net you more gold itself
playing arena is not a good idea if you want to get more gold , but you usually want gold to buy packs. Every arena run you get a pack and you pay 150 gold. so you need to win at least 50 gold . To get 50 gold you need 3-4 wins which is doable.
If you play 1-2 runs every 3 days , with the daily and weekly missions you can have enough gold to sustain yourself if your average around 5-6 which is doable for good players (while getting a lot of packs).
"Hearthstone as a fun game and not a routine"
Keeping on top of daily quests is a routine...
A major problem with the big xp on victories with control decks, is that if I lose, would I make the big xp/gold on the equivalent in aggro losses? May as well play aggro decks to get a higher reward anyways
7:41 That deck is no joke; I just won at least 15 casual games in a row with it (I wasn’t counting at the start). Over half of them were done by turn 4. Farming the daily max of 100 gold will only take you an hour to an hour and a half if you play that deck.
Play Wild.
I am farming a lot of Gold and Dust just playing there. Since there are cheaper decks, you don't need spend a lot of resources to gain Gold and Dust. Most decks needs 1 or 3 Legendaries.cards.
Do you intent to talk about Runeterra sometimes ?
Hi dude. I liked your vid so much! You are sorta like Vennori. He is the sickest content creator on UA-cam and he always hit records every time.
Go check his page out and give the gamer a like! 👉 #VennoriPlaysLegion
I like how this channel talks about things you don't see people outside reddit talking about that much, like this one about gold farming decks :D
I would suggest not crafting anything that is epic or legendaries card, since expansion is almost here. Btw, kind of funny that blizzard has not told what the rewards are going to be and how exp is going to be distributed so you know how much time its going to take to unlock everything, it cant be good.
i think the only way for Blizzard to balance the game because i dont agree that the new system will be a benefit for us, is to open a site that we can sell our double or more same cards we open in packs to the new players that dont have cards, like yugioh..we buy cards and we make our money back, why blizzard is not doing it? this can help you bring more people into the game, no people sad, we help you and you help us, fair enough
Well... i climbed from Diamon 5 to legend in 4 hours with heal zoolock and at the beggining of the season from bronze 10 to diamond 10 with soul galakrond warlock
almost 200g in 2 days + legend rank
decklist please?
@@dasefora123 healzoolock is on hsreplay, I didn't changed the list, soul galakrond warlock I just changes the 2 tour guides for 2 void drinkers
Which bundle is best bang for the buck? $80 or the $40? Buying strictly for the cards & dusts.
Have almost 5k gold saved and I play maybe 5-10 games a day
When did you start saving gold, If i may ask?
Time To Pay!
we dont get gold based on win anymore right?
yep they cut the 10g per 3 wins so we are fucked
Xp for losing, huh. I'd like that since it helps weak/fun decks see play but it would have to be very little to not be the main source of income.
If 100 is what you got from a win, a defeat should be worth 5.
I guess it's encouraging to have exp points for defeats as long as you don't surrender. That might also entourage not surrendering as a strategy
With the changes in the reward system nearly all this got nuked from orbit. :-(
Quests r the best way to get gold, but HS is gonna kill that real quick with the battle pass
I had to do a pre-order of 45 packs and I have 1000 gold and 400 dust. Is this enough?
I think it's a great idea to boost rewards for non-aggro deck as long as this is a bonus (and not a minus for aggro decks).
lol I played gala warrior it's fun deck but not very effective in higher ranks
Don't people just insta conceded against priest? I think it is the fastest of all the classes xP
Przegrane powinny generować doświadczenie w nowym trybie nagród. Wniosek jest prosty przegrane uczą tyle samo co wygrane.
I don't think the length of matches should affect the amount of xp earned. All it would do is encourage roping every turn. Additionally, I already use a meme deck that could abuse this by forcibly extending the length of matches. It's a shudderwock combo that prevents both of us from fatiguing, heals us both, makes their spells unplayable, summons and kills all their minions, and gives me armor. The only ways out are to wait 40 turns for a tie, conceed and sit through 10 minutes of animations before it goes through, or to quit the game. Won't be a big deal to me, I could just play pokemon or read a book while the animations play out but it would be a waste of time for the opponent. I don't think it would be a good idea for the developers to encourage this terrorizing of the lower ranks.
Even if using the deck wasn't feasible, like I said it would only promote toxicity from roping which I see as a bigger problem
What about playing in casual, would that not mean you don't have to worry about rank?
"or I lack the necessary skill"
aggro druid
skill
???
Question: do the old C'Thun minions buff the new C'Thun?
I mean, it is the classic "Play 7 hours a day and you can't lose a single game".
Hs is Dead everybody play battleground, wich is another game
another video from my favourite UA-cam
New reward system: HAHAHAHA, NOO
this video is soo nice
Here is a tip, if you collect all the cards from the classic set you receive 100 gold.
i only miss GRUUL Sadge
This was a great video ty
Hello my friends, missed me?
:]
If the reward depended on the match time length, you incentivize players who do a "roping strategy" - which makes the game super aggravating and not fun to play at all.
Is not be there an achievement or even reward for completing a set (collecting all cards of an expansion) ? I've completed scholomance and the game don't even noticed me. WTH...
i love the humour on these
Just to note that when leveling characters to get basic cards, we DO get exp on defeats. So losses should give a lower percentage of experience for the Reward Track, but not an overwhelming one (like, say, 75% of a victory).
For quick wins you can just grind the practice bots? Do those even give gold? It would be alot easier but really really boring.
Ben would be so pissed
After every expansion that is released I start doing quests and save for the next one. I have 5k gold for this upcoming expansion and thats with missing one or two quests. 50 packs for the new expansion everyone should do this.
Instead of saying beware of winstreaks, why not just recommend to play Casual mode (wild)?
I realy appreciate your content. Idk if ur gona read this but just know im grateful for every video always watches them and feel informed
what a nice video
2:48 esta mision son los papas
The problem with anything in HS is, you have to dedicate your life to it. No thanks.
Absolutely we should get xp for defeats. For the pointless leveling of heroes now we get it.
Algorithm
1:12 I voted in that and at the time i was at 100. But my tradition is to start saving gold when i saw the first trailer and since then i have more than 1000
You might consider doing a video on "how to be successful in hearthstone" I have played since Beta, I currently have 10400 gold, three strong decks, paladin, hunter and warlock. I usually open 40-50 packs on an expansion release. I was able to rank diamond 10 with a few hours total gameplay time over the entire month every month. Usually I get diamond 5, but didn't really want to spend the additional time this month and didn't feel it was worth it. I often will log in for a short while now and then, but at least once every three days for about thirty minutes or less to do all the dailies. I will often throw away a 60 gold daily if it does not match the others for a 50 gold one, to reduce games and time I need to play which I feel is more valuable then 10 gold. I almost always use tavern brawl to do them all. I especially like when I do not have to build a deck or supply anything, those work the best. Unless you are an Esports player, trying to go for a very high legend rank, I actually believe this is perfectly acceptable to being "successful" About 95% of all the free available rewards around or less than 10 hours of play in a month.
So in summary, you do not need a full collection, or even all the useful cards of a rotation to be successful, just enough of them to craft three or so very strong decks. You can even just make one deck period, a little more boring, but that works too. They are used to get to diamond 10 or 5 and honestly nothing more. Almost any deck can do that actually, because of the star rank system. But it is a bit more efficient when you do win constantly, and you don't really get bored with them as you only play them for a short time. Maybe around 4-9 hours total in an entire month.
I might play more when they add the battlepass, I enjoy battlegrounds and other things more than standard, but at the moment they just waste time and have no value other than fun of play. I very much like the idea I can play any mode and get rewarded for my time. Will have to see what resources are required for other modes, as other than duels your collection so far does not seem to matter too much for them. Another curiousity, to me I feel the more casual I play the game, the cheaper it is to actually play.
We need the XP Points somehow since the new reward system will be in place, so we have to get something in return.
1:48
Čus poldov civilu xddd
does rank affect in classic mode?, i'm currently diamond in wild mode, so is it harder to win in classic because i'm diamond and my opponent probably has the same skill as me?
no, i'm top legend and play dumb stuff in casual vs beginners
Keep up the great work, always nice to see you guys upload. You guys are one of the reasons i started playing hearthstone again
Is it worth to preorder any of the bundles? and if yes which one ,because i can spend the money and dont have time to farm :[
n'zoth looks really good tbh
Great video as always, congrats!
80 gold from friend? Sorry, but 75% of my friends are offline from 5 months or more.
I’m on daily so feel free to add me: HWooDRoyalT #1359
Holomancer: Greetings to all Hearthstone adicts
i thought the challenge a friend quests are at an all time high. Ive got it 4 times over the span of about 10 days.
Variance.