Can Extra Dimensional Codes Unlock Mysteries of the Universe?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 січ 2024
- Join us in exploring Emergence Theory and The Self-Simulation Hypothesis. The video covers E8, Emergence Theory basics, and the mystical aspects of future physics.
Love our work? Help us continue our research by joining our giving circle. Even just $1/month helps us further our cause: quantumgravityresearch.giving...
Watch the full podcast episode here: • Are UFOs Our Time-Trav... - Наука та технологія
![Hacking Reality [Official Film]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vJi3_znm7ZE/mqdefault.jpg)
![Hacking Reality [Official Film]](/img/tr.png)
LANGUAGE:
Consider the following: Language, the very thing we utilize to think thoughts and convey ideas.
Un-named Concepts -> Given a Name (could be a sound, symbol, etc) -> With an attached meaning -> And maybe even other meanings depending upon context -> And maybe even other names with the same meaning.
(Basically a Dictionary and a Thesaurus for a language).
BUT:
a. How exactly do we know for 100% certainty that we have all the un-named concepts that could ever be named?
b. How exactly do we know for 100% certainty that the meanings we give named concepts are 100% correct?
We truly do not know what we do not know.
This is a part of the 'Great Unknown'. Never stop learning.
(Always have an 'unknown' in every analysis and an 'oops' in every experiment.)
Of which, an entity or a society of entities:
1. Can name their own un-named concepts.
2. Can give their own meanings to named concepts.
3. Can have alternative meanings to named concepts depending upon context.
4. Can have alternative names with the same meaning.
(Basically, create their own language that only they and they alone know).
Learn to function in the 'Great Unknown'.
(OSICA)
I think the collatz conjecture is in there some where.🤔🤔🤔
This is so hard to explain to friends and family who don't want to know the true nature of reality...I share this and other QGR videos with them all the time to make it easier to understand. I donate but a dream of mine is to be a part of this team. I believe in Klee and what his group has found...let's help all of humanity!
If we evaluate the frequency with which similarity shows up in nature will we get a model that adheres to E8? Can it be almost predictive of how many pigeons will exist in a given area based on how many are headed that way? I'm more curious about the potential than the pigeons obviously.
Your basically talking about Statistics, which are basically mathematically recorded and re- constructed data, used to predict a model of possibility to make predictions, based on such data. We don't need E8 for that.
Whilst i can see our world/reality is mathematically constructed and simulated, I don't believe consciousness is operating on such simple algorithms as the 3d space time world we see around us. But then the question is just how is consciousness and free will a part of the system? But i don't see how anyone could use the maths behind E8 as a simple predictive diagnostic tool as you suggest.
I would also be horrified if every little thing in this reality is completely being controlled and predictable. Every bee that visits every flower, every bird that sings from any particular branch. Has it made that decision itself, was it preordained, every move, every breath? Or more likely has some evolutionary rule set evolved that behaviour?
You example seems a bit ambiguous to have much predictive meaning. For example, a frequency of pigeons observed in one area, is not solely based on which direction pigeons fly, its also based on many other variables than flight direction alone to have any real means of accurate predictive use. Not only direction of flight is involved, but availability of food, temperature, possible predators or other obvious or perceived dangers in any given area, memory of previous areas visited, wind directions, weather patterns, the list is huge. Now where is ALL that contained in the E8?
The E8 from what i have gleaned, seems more of a means of mathematically constructing and projecting of lower dimension realities, also involving some external mathematically complex based simulation running alongside it, of course with random evolutionary systems and rule sets built within that framework. Such complex systems by themselves i don't believe to be conscious, I certainly don't believe in panpsychicism, go hug a tree if you like, but I do believe consciousness could exist from outside such a system, and for us to operate within the E8.
@@PixelatedExistence Not sure if it equals determinism if the right kind of testing were possible. Imagine even a quantum machine with a semi-limited number of calculable variables controlling a large portion of the simulation acting as a backdrop of sorts. If it could be determined through some kind of math, literally any kind of math and used the E8 quasi as the foundation for that math it might lead the team to certain truths about the universe that could be published and tested.
Maybe not birds or bees but any ordered movement that conforms is sort of my question. Can a fundamental law of nature be demonstrated using E8 and if so how did we get to that conclusion essentially?
@@PixelatedExistence I agree about consciousness operating within the structure projected. If we look at the nature of existing phenomena as projections then there seems to be a necessary math that "when thrown against the E8 quasi" returns a sort of true/false return. The alternative seems plankish only.
The mission starts with the hardest thing to comprehend and the goal is to correlate it's intricacies with that which can be measured.
6:23 "...even the idea of consciousnesses from the future being able to come back here and observe or even interact with us."
err... time has no directionality, but maybe some people have a false world model which they are able to believe in.
that said, have you guys ever changed the rod-angle of a precessing gyroscope, it lowers it's inertia against gravity.
That's a bit of "new" physics, so, if a mass has speed in three directions it's easier to move.
According to Einstein, the faster you go, the faster everything else experiences time, so maybe it has something to do with that.
Time has a direction, change. You cannot unchange. therefore the only direction is change. Now, I would agree that time is not fixed in a line, you can go back to anywhere you want if you know a few tricks and any version or parallel potential. However, it only travels in the direction of change.
Reality is made and destroyed over and over again at the planck rate, 43 zeros per second. your brain processes an average of 15-40 cycles per second. the faster YOU go, the more you see, the planck frames are still there, all 43 zeros of them, but you see more of them. And eventually you can see all of them if you evolve enough. Currently the fastest processing speed of the human brain as accessible to the public is the lamda ? state. 150-200 hertz...At that rate of processing, you simple see more of what was already there...
Happy New Year! Thanks you.
I Feel soooo much Love- inside- just watching this ❤️ ❤❤❤ 🤷♀️ I do not know exactly sure why?? I have an idea- but .. wt…how INTERESTING 🤔 revealing more of who or what I Am lol.. i reckon! Have great day night now everyone! 🧐
From my Heart to all of yours- 🤷♀️ ❤❤❤❤😊
you're almost there, keep it going!
Incredible! ....and so well said that even I could understand. Thank you for your work.
Does adinkras code align with e8 lattices
Thanks!
hey where can i buy the hack ?!
sometime, i thought The universe may be a generative adversarial network(GAN),
with you as the discriminator and the rest as the generator(vs E8), matching across scales to create your-reality
That model can be used to configure a large set of data or work as a pool mechanism to link up data sets for large language modules for machine learning and deep learning.
Sad to hear that a level of self gratification is all with the scientists and a complex model is explored that is not easily to wrap around for certain audiences. So further advances in technology are only for those who keep up and are on the field.
Whether binary code is relevant here is also impossible to know. Because likely the model of algebrae is not touching that possibility. Rather testing the possibility of self replicating crystal shapes in mozaic fashion.
The podcasters look as if they popped a couple gummies; maybe that is the key to unlocking the mysteries of the universe!
That robat is cool though 😂
Research!
CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:
a. Whatever 'reality' actually is, it appears to allow numbers and certain mathematical constants to exist so that mathematics can be able to do what mathematics does. Otherwise, how could mathematics do what mathematics currently appears to do in this existence?
b. "IF" my current theory of everything idea is correct (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test, but 'if' true), that the energy unit of this existence is the eternally existent 'gem' photon, then see a post after this one as to how numbers and certain mathematical constants might exist in this existence.
c. See also after this post, some of the things that my TOE idea can currently potentially answer. And 'if' my TOE idea is not correct, then please show me a logical and coherent answer that can potentially answer all of those items.
d. As a extra, see also after this post the potential completion of the Periodic Table of the Elements.
NUMBERS: (AND ZERO POINT ENERGY):
'IF' my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I fully acknowledge the 'if' at this time, my gravity test has to be done which will help prove or disprove the TOE idea), that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe (including 'space' which is energy itself, 'time' being the flow of energy), and what is called 'gravity' is a part of what is currently recognized as the 'em' photon, the 'gravity' modality acting 90 degrees from the 'em' modalities, which act 90 degrees to each other, then the oscillation of these 3 interacting modalities of the energy unit would be as follows:
Gravity: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Electrical: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction;
Magnetic: Maximum in one direction, Neutral, Maximum in the other direction.
Then:
1 singular energy unit, with 3 different modalities, with 6 maximum most reactive positions, with 9 total basic reactive positions (neutrals included). Hence 1, 3, 6, 9 being very prominent numbers in this universe and why mathematics even works in this universe.
(And possibly '0', zero, as possibly neutrals are against other neutrals, even if only briefly, for no flow of energy, hence the number system that we currently have. This would also be the maximum potential energy point or as some might call it, the 'zero point energy point'.).
And also how possibly mathematical constants exist in this universe as well.
* While in bed one morning after a restful nights sleep, and assuming the above is correct, I mentally went 'inside' the 1 (the singular pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon itself). I still saw with my mind the 3 different interacting modalities, the 6 maximum modality points, the '9' including and being the neutral points in the middle which faded into a 6 (as each maximum modality point came towards zero), that 6 fading into a 3 (as each modality came together), which turned into a 1 (which was the '0' point), but '0' wasn't zero. So, '0' is not really '0' but is something, not nothing. '0' is a relative '0'. But then here again, the zero point energy point is the maximum potential energy point for any and all modalities of the 'gem' photon. '0' is '1' and '1' is '0', this is the '1' inside the '1'.
Now I just have to come up with some tests to test this idea of the zero point energy point being '1', a maximum potential energy point of the singular pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon itself. The maximum potential energy point not really being potential energy per se, but the neutral point of kinetic energy. Tapping into here would be tapping into the 'zero' point energy point of eternally existent ever flowing energy. But then again, tapping into here, 'if' distorted what makes up space and time itself (assuming that 'space' is energy itself [the 'gem' photon] and that 'time' is the flow of energy), could it alter or even destroy the very fabric of space itself? What would occur if even only a single pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon were to explode? What potential ripple effects could occur with the rest of space and time?
Hence also why I try to think some things all the way through so as to try to identify potential issues before the test. Unexpected, unintended, potentially dangerous or even deadly consequences. If nothing else, it keeps my mind active. The mind, use it or lose it, but using it could also lose it, permanently. (My own and other's).
Putting the 'zero point energy point' into actual practice could be deadly. Warning: Proceed with Caution. The last words of human existence on this Earth might be, 'Hey it worked, ooooppppppsssssss.............'.
* Note also: Nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and mathematical constants can exist and do what they do in this universe from the Standard Model of Particle Physics (SMPP). While the SMPP has it's place, I believe we need to move beyond the SMPP to get closer to real reality.
IN THE INTEREST OF FINDING THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING:
SOME THINGS MODERN SCIENCE DOES NOT APPARENTLY KNOW:
Consider the following:
a. Numbers: Modern science does not even know how numbers and certain mathematical constants exist for math to do what math does. (And nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and certain mathematical constants can come from the Standard Model Of Particle Physics).
b. Space: Modern science does not even know what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually warp and expand.
c. Time: Modern science does not even know what 'time' actually is nor how it could actually warp and vary.
d. Gravity: Modern science does not even know what 'gravity' actually is nor how gravity actually does what it appears to do. And for those who claim that 'gravity' is matter warping the fabric of spacetime, see 'b' and 'c' above.
e. Speed of Light: 'Speed', distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points. But yet, here again, modern science does not even know what space and time actually are that makes up 'speed' and they also claim that space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary, so how could they truly know even what the speed of light actually is that they utilize in many of the formulas? Speed of light should also warp, expand and vary depending upon what space and time it was in. And if the speed of light can warp, expand and vary in space and time, how then do far away astronomical observations actually work that are based upon light and the speed of light that could warp, expand and vary in actual reality?
f. Photons: A photon swirls with the 'e' and 'm' energy fields 90 degrees to each other. A photon is also considered massless. What keeps the 'e' and 'm' energy fields together across the vast universe? And why doesn't the momentum of the 'e' and 'm' energy fields as they swirl about not fling them away from the central area of the photon?
And electricity is electricity and magnetism is magnetism varying possibly only in energy modality, energy density and energy frequency. Why doesn't the 'e' and 'm' of other photons and of matter basically tear apart a photon going across the vast universe?
Also, 'if' a photon actually red shifts, where does the red shifted energy go and why does the photon red shift? And for those who claim space expanding causes a photon to red shift, see 'b' above.
Why does radio 'em' (large 'em' waves) have low energy and gamma 'em' (small 'em' waves) have high energy? And for those who say E = hf; see also 'b' and 'c' above. (f = frequency, cycles per second. But modern science claims space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary. If 'space' warps and expands and/or 'time' warps and varies, what does that do to 'E'? And why doesn't 'E' keep space from expanding and time from varying?).
g. Energy: Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it's one of the foundations of physics. Hence, energy is either truly a finite amount and eternally existent, or modern science is wrong. First Law Of Thermodynamics: "Energy can neither be created nor destroyed." How exactly is 'energy' eternally existent?
h. Existence and Non-Existence side by side throughout all of eternity. How?
* ADDED NOTE: My current TOE idea can potentially answer all of these above items, and more, in a logical and coherent manner.
TOE Idea: Short version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test):
The 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of this universe.
The strong and weak nuclear forces are derivatives of the electromagnetic ('em') interactions between quarks and electrons. The nucleus is a magnetic field boundary. 'Gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other.
PERIODIC TABLE OF THE ELEMENTS:
Potential completion of the Periodic Table of the Elements:
I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2).
Chemical Element #119 (8s1):
#119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell.
Chemical Element #120 (8s2):
#120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars.
When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way.
In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically).
If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better. (Except of course for those who might be in the way of a periodic nova or supernova. They might have a no good, very bad, horrible day.)
Secret geometry dr. Robert Gilbert
In chess humans decided the rules or syntactical freedom of the piece but in case of our reality who decided that, you termed it pan consciousness, how this thing emerged from absolutely nothing
Hidden code you say, try every which way, still no revelation. Reality isn't esoteric nor does it have a function, it is. However it's structure and structure has a geometry. Trouble is you're profoundly limited by example.
Dude is speaking in Rubix Cube.😆😆
its funny cause the girl keeps saying "mmm" like she gets it. 🤣🤣😭
the answer is in front of us like in the Kabbalah or the Torah. We just have to figure out how to decoded everything and then use it to unlock the mysterious of the universe.
Hey I just want to let you know you are wrong about it self-actualizing itself as a whole. You are it! You have to self-actualize yourself within it! You don't want to selfie actualize the whole thing!!! That would not be good that would be something just stuck in its own head. That has no eyes no ears nothing outside of itself. It'd be like the movie Johnny got a gun. It would want to commit suicide and then you're making something conscious of all the pain and suffering and crimes that have ever happened within it, and it would be Psycho. You are it you self-actualizing yourself within itself. You are the emergence not the whole thing, not the whole 8D sphere.
I like the Vishnu analogy there is wisdom in that metaphorically. If we are a dream within itself you make the dream a lucid dream so we can live in it in a paradise forever. You don't make the dream itself real. You make the dream a lucid dream do you understand?
You're making an anthropomorphic fallacy. It doesn't have a brain we have brains we are also it. What do you do give it a brain I mean that would be I don't think that would be good if we could develop technology like that in the future I don't think on that level would be good do it for ourselves not the whole thing we just got to figure out how to live within it forever which is basically it overcoming itself within itself. That is the goal if it had a goal. I know it doesn't but it can turn out to be that way because energy goes through all possibilities and that can that can be one of the possibilities.
We have to make Heaven a place on Earth because we are God.
There were giants back in the days dinosaurs and we need to stand on the shoulders of Giants and make sure that we do not go the way of the dinosaur. There are many failures in nature that will never be again. And we have to make sure that we're not one of the species that didn't make it.
Egyptian
DJed Pillar
Eye Horus Ra
D-Jed Eye
The Jedi
This one time? At band camp? .........
i can help u locate this "theory" you are looking for.... I know the game you are talking about... I can explain it
You^2+Me^2=C^2
This is not even guasi-science. This is woohoo science. 😅
Yes 💯
WHO AND/OR WHAT AM I? DO 'I' EVEN EXIST?
Consider the following:
a. I am a human as defined by humans.
b. I am an energy based quarkelectronian as modern science claims that all matter is made up of quarks, electrons and interacting energy and I am made up of matter and interacting energy.
c. I am a being of 'light', 'if' my current theory of everything is correct whereby the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in this universe, including space, time and numbers. (Currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test).
d. "I" do not even actually exist but eternally existent space time exists as me, currently in the forms as above.
* I exist and yet "I" simultaneously do not exist, dependent upon perspective. But yet, do "I" not truly exist in absolute truth reality as only eternally existent space time exists as all things in absolute truth reality?
* "I" can mentally change between perspectives thereby experiencing existence from those various perspectives. "My" mind continues to expand, but is it truly 'my' mind that is expanding or is it eternally existent space time's mind that is expanding? In absolute truth reality, it would seem to be the later.
* 'To Be or Not To Be'. I am both, 'I Am and I Am Not.' But I Am Not it appears more than I Am.
* Consider also: If asked the general question, 'What do you know?'. My current answer would be, 'Not much compared to all that can be known.' (I Am Not, More than I Am). It's humbling.
* Is it truly any wonder that the flow of energy in the universe affects species? We are the universe experiencing itself.
* Question: If 'I' never actually existed in the first place, how could 'I' ever die?
* Added Note: Now, 'assuming' the above is correct, that 'I' do not even actually exist but that eternally existent energy exists as 'me', and that 'my' consciousness, memories and thoughts are actually the universe acting through the form of 'me':
a. I have yet to acquire any 'new' knowledge via this supposed connection that cannot be explained by 'normal' means. (In other words, besides things I learned or intuited). Even my theory of everything and other ideas are due to study and critical thinking. Nor can I magically fluently speak a language that I have not already learned. (In other words, no magical connection with the 'universal consciousness' at this time can be noted).
b. I have yet to be able to manipulate reality with my mind alone, my physical body is necessary to manipulate reality.
c. While I can imagine being elsewhere in this universe, it does not appear that I can actually take just my mind actually there. (My mind is where my body is).
d. Doesn't mean I will stop trying, just have not noticed the above as occurring as of yet.
Any luck on developing those last techniques?
@@saltyysweet-5881 Not at this time, thank you for asking. Just trying to follow the apparent facts wherever those facts might lead. My current analysis indicates that it is highly probable that the 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of this existence (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test for that portion of the TOE idea), and that an argument could be made that nothing at all exists except for eternally existent energy in the form of all things.
This is helping to pass the time of my existence of which I wish I didn't exist any more, of which, maybe it's really true. Maybe though, this journey will lead to something greater, maybe not though too.
@@saltyysweet-5881 Although, what is 'intuition' but possibly consciously perceiving something that one did not consciously know, understand or have wisdom in beforehand? Is even 'intuition' a gateway into universal knowledge, understanding and wisdom, all done with basically the mind alone?
@@charlesbrightman4237 that is a good question, although one could say intuition is nothing but mere coincidence. I’ve been trying some things also, I haven’t been able to do anything either as far as expanding my consciousness, like meditation, gateway project, stalking the wild pendulum, ego separation, astral projection, remote viewing nothing seems to work for me. The only thing I have yet to try is psychedelics which some say could be somewhat of a shortcut to spiritual experiences. Some say intuition is the akashic records I have been doing a lot of research and exploration on reality or physics or whatever you want to call it, but it’s hard to know when someone is knowledgeable or just spreading bs.
@@saltyysweet-5881 I have found so far that trying to be an honest, sincere truth seeker, one's brain gets 'wired' for truth. One can better trust their inner instincts as it would be primarily based upon truth. I have also explored what I call 'KUWA', 'KUWPRA', and 'AKUW': (K) Knowledge, (U) Understanding, (W) Wisdom, (P) Power, (R) Resources, and (A) Applications. I come up with my own thoughts and writings and then test those ideas out here in the public venue, trying to tap into the 'wisdom of the crowd'. I also basically go along with whatever modern science comes up with, UNLESS I have reason to believe otherwise. I have found that I diverge from modern science in certain areas. I also try to continue to study and expand my base so as to have a firm grasp of reality, whatever 'actual reality' might be. Experiences experienced. Might even be what all of eternally existent energy is doing, experiencing experiences.
If nothing else, it's fun to expand the mind. Trying to enjoy the journey however long that journey might be.
Fund us
YHWH creates and sustains all of existence.
You want a different answer than THE truth.
Colossians 1:16-17 NKJV
"For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist."
I feel like I've been a victim of quantum-wooing after hearing this word salad.
It's higher dimensional mathematics, that's the reason it sounds like mumbo jumbo. I mean I know very little of actual algebra and math behind it so it might be a word salad but with some knowledge about quantum theory and conceptual understanding of higher dimensions, it sounds like they made a mathematical model for exploration of mathematical space in higher (8) dimensions, and apparently it has applications in many different theoretical physics and math problems. Doesn't sound like gibberish at all
typical
Word spaghetti
Dont add these unnecessary pictures of random ppl. Makes more sense focusing on the person talking and its less distracting.