Hunter, what controls do you use so that you can manually zoom in the TGP? I tried the Zoom axis thing, but it is really not practical because it takes so long to zoom eventho I have the multiplier maxed out in settings. Great video best regards.
The AARGM-ER (anti-radiation missile, the improved version of the AGM-88) and the SIAW (a new air-to-ground missile based on the AARGM-ER, featuring a triple seeker composed of IIR, anti-radiation, and its own millimeter-wave radar seeker, still developing) are known to have a speed of over Mach 2.
@bpop2148 at this point HARMs are necessary, the US doctrine is heavily based on it and the ground support is optimized for SEAD. Without SEAD we see what the current issue is, American air getting slapped out of the sky by SPAA (irl they wouldn’t be turning on their radar like they do in game due to the HARM risk)
Really sad that basically all US AGMs are either slow or have very short burn time. Main problem with Hellfire too that it has so little energy at the end of travel, that your effective range against moving targets is about 5km maximum (can work further but chances are very low), against a manouvering heli it's 2-3km.
People talk a lot of shit about hellfires and mavs but it’s simply a skill issue. I can launch all 6 Mavs off of my f15e in GRB, and most of the time 4-5 will kill something and the rest critical damage at the least. Sometimes all of them hit, you just have to use them correctly and not launch them while you’re low altitude and approaching the front line As for hellfires, mostly all of the time I absolutely never miss a hellfire, it’s simple as this, lock your target and adjust the laser directly center mass or on top of the turret, guaranteed kill everytime. And yeah they’re only effective against helis at like 2-3km out at higher altitude Not to mention hellfires are not modeled correctly like the other user above said, and also the true functionality of hellfires will never be added because of how OP they are. The Apache has an insanely good radar, one that is even more advanced than the S1 (prove me wrong) and the longbow hellfire can fire over hilltops with radar guidance using the Apaches radar. But gaijin will never add those
Yeah the Hellfire's loft curve is a 50/50 Hi-Lo loft meaning that it climbs high and falls low bleeding all of its speed during flight. It tries to impact the target's side instead of top down. They need a switch to make it behave either hi, lo, or direct fire (imagine Vikhr)
@@ciruski416also hellfires should be going to the point where they were last lased. meaning if you lose sight of the target it’ll still fly. but alas, they don’t.
HUNTER doing voice-over 🤔 Also, hunter, im mad that the eurofighter didn't get that much of a good ground munition, so im asking russia or america And su39 or AV-8B (NA? 😊
Thanks so much for your generosity my friend, I really appreciate it. God bless you :) Eurofighter is amazing, I like the futuristic performance and Paveway IV, video soon. Both Su-39 and Harrier NA are good grinders in sim EC, and both are good as CAS in Ground RB, it is up to preference, I would choose Harrier NA and unlock Su-25T in the USSR tech tree for free.
the AGM-130 irl has the ability to be manually guided by the WSO. It would be launched from miles out and guided to the relative area via GPS/INS and the WSO would designate the target. Im sure you can see why gaijin wouldnt want that feature in the game but also why bother adding the AGM-130 if it's just gonna suck lol
The Russian UMPK series and the kh 38 series can do that from what I remember. The kh 38 can also be used like a predator missile from call of duty and then establish a lock to which the missile follows a target. E.g you go super slow behind mountains, fire it upwards not in line of sight and lock on. Also the Fab 3000UMPK should glide more and also can be designated by other aircraft or the ground via glonass
The future of SEAD and DEAD in WT is at over saturation, so things like SDB I and SDB II (model in datamine) would be much more effctive than a high speed missile. You can already confuse TWS SAMs with SDBs so much that they can't hit you while you are releasing 4-5 SDBs
Just yesterday, I launched like 6-7 SDB-1’s against two pantsir’s. Four at one, and like two or three at another. All but one got shot down, the last one was a direct hit and failed to kill. I hate this game
Using the new IR version is incredibly good with the f-111f as your just to quick for their missiles to catch up its my new favorite way to bully pantsirs.
i am amazed how you stay so long in the air without getting a pantsir in ur face instantly there is obv something im doing hella wrong.. it cant be that the pantsir is so extremly op even if it is imo great vid as usual !
Wow! I've anticipated this thijg for so long! And this video to be made about it for just as long! 😂 The coolest part of this being on the current F15E is unlike the laser guided wing mounted bombs, you can take a combo of Amraams and Sidewinders alongside the 130! So, unlike taking a loadout of 7x 2000lb bombs, you can take 5x 2000lb bombs, and then 2x AGM130s and a pair of 120s and 9Ms! This helps a lot in sim battles! 😊 And dang! The range on these is insane 😅
There is also the tried and tested AGM88 HARM with more than Mach 2, which uses, for example, the radar signal emitted by the target if it is an anti-aircraft position, but we will never see that in this game, because then it's goodnight Pantsier. And then there is the AGM142 or Popeye from Israel with more than Mach 1, which is also used by the USA.
The way the implemented this is SO disappointing to me. I was hyped to see it coming, but now it’s just a crappier maverick and not the badass weapon it is supposed to be
Honestly I think it's more that they probably don't have the capability for it yet. At it's core it'd be a manual lock-after-launch which I don't think the game can support right now. It'll be cool if/when it can, but I'm not going to blame them on this one, especially with the recent buff to it.
@@TacgnolSimulacrum, the Warfare 2077 event's version of Spike missile is an exaple of how it can look like. It just need seeker view, instead of 3 person.
@@TacgnolSimulacrum can’t imagine it would be too hard, limit it so only one AGM-130 could be fired and active at one time- then just switch to the seeker view when it’s time to achieve a lock-on.
If u paid attention to when the AJ Martel was added on the Bucc S2 then you would know that they didn’t know how to make that work yet. Or didn’t want to add that feature. A long time ago the AGM Bullpup on the FJ4B ruined GRB because you could fire and guide them by viewing the missile with the “U” key and getting kills totally safe for free.
The AGM-130 is a precision-guided stand-off weapon designed to engage stationary and slow-moving, strategically important ground targets. Target localisation by GPS/INS + CCD sensor or infrared seeker. Thanks to its rocket propulsion, the AGM-130 can engage targets at a range of 60 km - in contrast to the largely identical GBU-15 glide bomb. The unit price is around 885,000 US dollars. I'm already looking forward for more great videos from you! Greetings from: 🇩🇪
After playing the EF Typhoon with 18 brimstones I think Gaijin needs to relook at how Spawn Costs are calculated. The fact that the best plane in the game can spawn with 18 brimstones for cheaper SP than this thing with these IR missiles or 6 mavericks is crazy. *Edit 18 not 16
not just that, and F-4F ICE with just two mavericks would cost the same SP as an F-15 with full load out of mavericks and glide bombs with air-to-air missiles. peak balance
The brimstonenes aren't as good as the mavericks because you have to launch them all individually. The f15 has more kill potential before getting shot down. The f15e is still probably the best plane right now anyway
The AGM-88 HARM and it's replacement the AARGM-ER are Mach 2 missiles. It's more likely that WT will add the AGM-88 because the AARGM-ER is only a couple of years old and hasn't really been fielded yet.
The AGM-158XR would be nice to see,it has about an 1000km range and is a stealth cruise missile so it would go undetected on the pantsir’s radar. It unfortunately is subsonic but that wouldn’t matter due to its stealth :)
I found with tv weapons you can point lock a spot a target is and once the weapon gets into track lock range it will start tracking the target and you can point lock with the TGP farther then the seeker head can lock. Weird you can’t point lock in the seeker but you can in the TGP.
Hi Hunter! you asked about NATO missiles, I can't say for European powers but US could potentially see AGM-84E SLAM on the A-6E and future F/A-18C (potentially even S-3 Viking), or the upgraded AGM-84H SLAM-ER which could come to the F-15E and later F/A-18E Super Hornet. The SLAM is a modified AGM-84 Harpoon ASM with the IR seeker head of the AGM-65F and INS taken from the AGM-62. These both however are still subsonic as far as I know :(
@@Hunter_i86 Gaijin are more than determined to not add supersonic ATGMs to any other nation it seems other than Russia, they have KH-29T to the JH-7A in the Chinese tree when in reality China have their own domestic homebrew ATGM the KD-88 they have "to much range" according to Gaijin of 180km they fly at .9 mach and in the last 30km they accelerate to Mach 1.3. China also have a slew of Supersonic ATGMS and ASM but Gaijin state they have no place in the game in every issue report.
hmmm that means 10.0 aircraft might face it! Sounds very challenging for planes like Su-25A and A-10 Early but not impossible I guess, pilots will need to stay far.
I hate this -rigged scam- game but your videos are always relaxing to watch. This one in particular reminds me of when I played Jane's F-15, in the late 90s =)
@@Hunter_i86 Damn, I miss them so much too ! Also, do you remember Comanche 3, F-16 vs. MiG-29, Combat Flight Simulator, F-22 and most of Novalogic games ? 🥰
I did some search and found out only AGM-130 and AGM-142 was option of tactical standoff A2G missile in USAF inventory until JASSM got introduced. I also found that AGM-142 barely breaks supersonic speed 😂
@@Hunter_i86 I see, thanks for the information (But it use the Maverick pylons... Is AGM-65D a better choice over any other weapons for the wing pylons? Most of the time I mean)
Hi Hunter like always nice video and I am really sad again because my friend and I are argueing about the grind again I talked with him yesterday that it is only a game and since we aren´t playing together anymore he should ignore what I am grinding but I said yes again to no grinding the Eurofighter and that was very very stupid but have a very nice day my friend. One more question what do you think is better the Eurofighter or the Rafale?
Hello, EF is amazing, the performance of this plane is futuristic haha. I love the Hammer on Rafale too. Dude, play whatever you like and ignore the haters.
حبيبي هاني اشكرك .. برأيي المتواضع الدفاع الجوي الان مو قوي لدرجة نحتاج صواريخ اخماد راداري، اذا ضافوا صواريخ مضادة للرادارات رح نحتاج الى منظومات دفاع جوي متقدمة اكثر وهذا الشي رح يصير بالسنة القادمة، حسب ما صرحوا بالموقع .. بصراحة اني ادعم هذا القرار لان الدعم الجوي القريب الان مسيطر ويحتاج الى رادع اكبر بالطرف المضاد، اكبر من البانتسير أس واحد
Looks like just the HARM and AARGM missiles can really do some fast air to ground missions. The SiAW likely can too but it’s not in service until 2026 or late next year. But can the harm even see a pantsir radar?
@ Yeah, I’m just not sure if there’s a limit to what bands or frequencies it can see or not. I saw a war Thunder forum post saying it couldn’t. But idk
There’s different seekerhead for each harm missile that are loaded on preflight unless it’s the most modern one that can see all bands at once. So before each game you’d have to pick the seeker that can see the pantsirs radar mode but if you pick that one it may not work against other aa.
I mean, if they introduce the AGM-130 alongside the F-111F in Update 2.39 and allow the Aardvark to carry four AGM-130s simultaneously, just like in real life, I’d be interested in trying it out. However, the current situation makes it seem unnecessary to use.
The AGM longbow is 16 non smoke able missiles, are you okay or something, they aren't even close to the same and on a small more nimbal helicopter, it would be like unlocking the kh 38mt and giving LMUR missiles to ka 52, mi 28nm
@@Adailyteaconsumer There are countless weapons in the game that don't function the way they do irl. They've also limited the potential of weapons before, whether it be their range or other aspects. If Gaijin actually valued realism more, then it'd be a different story.
These are actively missing the ability to guide them after launch from stand off ranges. The brimstone’s are NOT the only thing missing it’s irl capabilities
@@Hunter_i86 and then somehow you almost instantly know if enemy plane is in the air. Switching to aim-120b and launching.. how do you do that? Amazing job man!! Im watching your videos and learning a lot!
One missile that NATO has had since the 80’ that would absolutely destroy SPAA is the The AGM-88 HARM (High-speed Anti-Radiation Missile). With crazy stats like: Low-level - 13 nmi (25 km) Medium-level - 43 nmi (80 km) Standoff - 80 nmi (148 km) AGM-88G - 160 nmi (300 km) Maximum speed Mach 2.9 (987 m/s; 3238 ft/s) I see why it hasn’t been added…….yet.
The way it got implemented is SO stupid. The AGM-130 was always meant to be deployed at standoff ranges, and then being driven by the WSO with MITL datalink, to lock onto the target and hit it. We should be allowed to switch to the weapons camera with V’ and steer it in, with similar keybinds to the other guided MCLOS missiles and guided bombs, or like the AGM-12. The way it’s done is really disappointing, I don’t even care to grind for it now in my F111F..
@ if that’s the argument, then don’t add it to the game, but there’s plenty of other weapons that are just as busted, if not worse. Trying to balance things without making it too gamey and unrealistic is a slipper slope. Honestly I forget there’s not many of us who play sim, this is where I would like to use it. But the way it’s implemented would make it useless to use in air sim, and unfortunate really because it’s a cool weapon.
agm-84 with ir tracker would be the counter to kh38 but there is no pics of it on f15 only the radar variant aka the harpoon on the korean and saudi f15 also slam-er would be good but its speed is low
@@Hunter_i86 AGM-142 is about Mach 1.1 and unfortunately, no other A2G ordinances with standoff capability for US is JASSM. I believe it's because USAF's precautious doctrine of eliminate enemy guided AA assets out before send in the planes with precision guided munitions. AGM-88 series and AGM-78 series retained the Mach 2.9 max speed while other mass produced AGMs speed ROC did not required Super/Hypersonic speed.
@@Hunter_i86 TLDR : AGM-88 series is the only Mach 2 capable A2G in US and its associated allied countries because they all got influenced doctrine of massive air interdiction before sending tactical jets into the battlefield for precision strikes. Before Anti-Radiation missile is here, western hemisphere ranged A2G guidance weaponry is indeed will stay inferior...
@@Hunter_i86 Did you try the Su-27SM after the "somewhat" fix thing is rather good at dogfighting now, and Su-34 doesn't lose that much speed after a turn now instead of dropping to 300, now it maintains 450 km/h
The missile just got changed from AGM-130A to AGM-130A-12, it is now IR with high track range, similar to IR PGM & Maverick D.
Wonderful timing Gaijin
Is that a buff, nerf, or neutral change?
Plllzzz make another vid showcasing this
Hunter, what controls do you use so that you can manually zoom in the TGP? I tried the Zoom axis thing, but it is really not practical because it takes so long to zoom eventho I have the multiplier maxed out in settings. Great video best regards.
Buff, longer tracking range.
@KasualKaiser thanks
The AARGM-ER (anti-radiation missile, the improved version of the AGM-88) and the SIAW (a new air-to-ground missile based on the AARGM-ER, featuring a triple seeker composed of IIR, anti-radiation, and its own millimeter-wave radar seeker, still developing) are known to have a speed of over Mach 2.
GAhahahahah, if gaijin adds SEAD all hell will break lose
@@crimsonwolf866they said that there were no plans on adding Anti-Radiation missiles.
@bpop2148 yet
Gaijin in all their wisdom don’t believe they work
@bpop2148 at this point HARMs are necessary, the US doctrine is heavily based on it and the ground support is optimized for SEAD. Without SEAD we see what the current issue is, American air getting slapped out of the sky by SPAA (irl they wouldn’t be turning on their radar like they do in game due to the HARM risk)
Bro dropped some movie level evasion at 17:40 - we love to see it 👌
It was close! :D
Really sad that basically all US AGMs are either slow or have very short burn time. Main problem with Hellfire too that it has so little energy at the end of travel, that your effective range against moving targets is about 5km maximum (can work further but chances are very low), against a manouvering heli it's 2-3km.
Hellfire flight path is not modelled correctly atm, that's why they have so little energy in their terminal phase
People talk a lot of shit about hellfires and mavs but it’s simply a skill issue. I can launch all 6 Mavs off of my f15e in GRB, and most of the time 4-5 will kill something and the rest critical damage at the least. Sometimes all of them hit, you just have to use them correctly and not launch them while you’re low altitude and approaching the front line
As for hellfires, mostly all of the time I absolutely never miss a hellfire, it’s simple as this, lock your target and adjust the laser directly center mass or on top of the turret, guaranteed kill everytime. And yeah they’re only effective against helis at like 2-3km out at higher altitude
Not to mention hellfires are not modeled correctly like the other user above said, and also the true functionality of hellfires will never be added because of how OP they are. The Apache has an insanely good radar, one that is even more advanced than the S1 (prove me wrong) and the longbow hellfire can fire over hilltops with radar guidance using the Apaches radar. But gaijin will never add those
This could possibly be solved with the Israeli Popeye AGM as the US used it under the name AGM-142 Have Nap.
Yeah the Hellfire's loft curve is a 50/50 Hi-Lo loft meaning that it climbs high and falls low bleeding all of its speed during flight. It tries to impact the target's side instead of top down. They need a switch to make it behave either hi, lo, or direct fire (imagine Vikhr)
@@ciruski416also hellfires should be going to the point where they were last lased. meaning if you lose sight of the target it’ll still fly.
but alas, they don’t.
Very not in time, as they have changed it today to IR
Oh really now? That’s odd because what I heard, only the V2 got it and the one we have in game is the V1. But interesting nonetheless.
Is the track range better?
@@rifroll1117 much better than TV
God damn it Gaijin, yeah it is now typically like the IR PGM.
@@Hunter_i86 there is 2 variants in game on tv the other is ir
HUNTER doing voice-over 🤔
Also, hunter, im mad that the eurofighter didn't get that much of a good ground munition, so im asking russia or america
And su39 or AV-8B (NA? 😊
Thanks so much for your generosity my friend, I really appreciate it. God bless you :)
Eurofighter is amazing, I like the futuristic performance and Paveway IV, video soon.
Both Su-39 and Harrier NA are good grinders in sim EC, and both are good as CAS in Ground RB, it is up to preference, I would choose Harrier NA and unlock Su-25T in the USSR tech tree for free.
@@Hunter_i86 u right im so stupid for using the brimstones and not the IVs thank you
First game using paveway IVs was fun the brimsones are too slow and I would get killed by AA specially pansirs thank u 🫠
And TGP's are still limited to 20km...
And most maps have a max range of 10-20km from the battlefield
Not in air rb though. And in the bigger ground maps tanks don’t even render above 10km
In Air Sim the Litening III has laser range of 40 KM with the Paveway IV.
the AGM-130 irl has the ability to be manually guided by the WSO. It would be launched from miles out and guided to the relative area via GPS/INS and the WSO would designate the target. Im sure you can see why gaijin wouldnt want that feature in the game but also why bother adding the AGM-130 if it's just gonna suck lol
Gaijin give us two-player vehicles!
Most of the IR and TV missiles in game also have that. So you will make CAS even more broken.
The Russian UMPK series and the kh 38 series can do that from what I remember. The kh 38 can also be used like a predator missile from call of duty and then establish a lock to which the missile follows a target. E.g you go super slow behind mountains, fire it upwards not in line of sight and lock on. Also the Fab 3000UMPK should glide more and also can be designated by other aircraft or the ground via glonass
Such a satisfying lauch how it falls for a while, then the rocket motor kicks in and off it goes!
Yeah, but in practicality that makes it way worse you have to get up like a good few kilometers so that it won’t just fall out the sky
Incredible as always hunter.
Appreciate it! Glad you enjoyed it.
The future of SEAD and DEAD in WT is at over saturation, so things like SDB I and SDB II (model in datamine) would be much more effctive than a high speed missile. You can already confuse TWS SAMs with SDBs so much that they can't hit you while you are releasing 4-5 SDBs
SPICE 250, small SDBs with FnF capabilities, who knows what the future holds
Just yesterday, I launched like 6-7 SDB-1’s against two pantsir’s. Four at one, and like two or three at another. All but one got shot down, the last one was a direct hit and failed to kill. I hate this game
@@christopherchartier3017 You gotta drop the SDBs and then fire off a few Mavericks.
@@saltysteel3996 didn’t have enough sp at the time for mavericks
Israel doesn’t even get mavericks even though the agm-65ds didn’t magically disappear when they went from F-16a to F-16d and F-15
Hunter you really are one of the best pilots here. You keep surprising me during the videos!
Wow, thanks! I appreciate it brother ❤
Using the new IR version is incredibly good with the f-111f as your just to quick for their missiles to catch up its my new favorite way to bully pantsirs.
The delayed booster phase sound effect is very cool, like a heavy ripping sound.
So it’s similar to the skipper except it can lock on like a Maverick and isn’t laser guided. Interesting
i am amazed how you stay so long in the air without getting a pantsir in ur face instantly
there is obv something im doing hella wrong..
it cant be that the pantsir is so extremly op even if it is imo
great vid as usual !
Nowadays Fox 3 active radar homing missiles and smokeless Heat Seekers are the biggest threat in 12.7 Ground RB, not Pantsir S1, in my opinion.
2:28 i love how this missile activate engine after few second after launch with this sound😮 Looks so goddamn cinematic
👍
I love the F-15E. So happy to have it in game.
Wow! I've anticipated this thijg for so long! And this video to be made about it for just as long! 😂
The coolest part of this being on the current F15E is unlike the laser guided wing mounted bombs, you can take a combo of Amraams and Sidewinders alongside the 130!
So, unlike taking a loadout of 7x 2000lb bombs, you can take 5x 2000lb bombs, and then 2x AGM130s and a pair of 120s and 9Ms! This helps a lot in sim battles! 😊
And dang! The range on these is insane 😅
Yeah, that’s a pretty good loadout.
There is also the tried and tested AGM88 HARM with more than Mach 2, which uses, for example, the radar signal emitted by the target if it is an anti-aircraft position, but we will never see that in this game, because then it's goodnight Pantsier. And then there is the AGM142 or Popeye from Israel with more than Mach 1, which is also used by the USA.
For the HARM, Gaijin said there's no plan to add anti-radiation missiles and of course the HARM is one so that's out
Bruh, Gaijin forgot about datalink in AGM-130......
The way the implemented this is SO disappointing to me. I was hyped to see it coming, but now it’s just a crappier maverick and not the badass weapon it is supposed to be
Honestly I think it's more that they probably don't have the capability for it yet. At it's core it'd be a manual lock-after-launch which I don't think the game can support right now. It'll be cool if/when it can, but I'm not going to blame them on this one, especially with the recent buff to it.
@@TacgnolSimulacrum, the Warfare 2077 event's version of Spike missile is an exaple of how it can look like. It just need seeker view, instead of 3 person.
@@TacgnolSimulacrum can’t imagine it would be too hard, limit it so only one AGM-130 could be fired and active at one time- then just switch to the seeker view when it’s time to achieve a lock-on.
If u paid attention to when the AJ Martel was added on the Bucc S2 then you would know that they didn’t know how to make that work yet. Or didn’t want to add that feature.
A long time ago the AGM Bullpup on the FJ4B ruined GRB because you could fire and guide them by viewing the missile with the “U” key and getting kills totally safe for free.
i love the PGM while using France, they hit like a freight train
Nice video and merry Christmas. Which plane do you prefer for CAS atm with all the new additions? I personally prefer EF with Brim such a menace.
"Can we have PGM?"
"We have PGM at home."
PGM at home:
The AGM-130 is a precision-guided stand-off weapon designed to engage stationary and slow-moving, strategically important ground targets. Target localisation by GPS/INS + CCD sensor or infrared seeker. Thanks to its rocket propulsion, the AGM-130 can engage targets at a range of 60 km - in contrast to the largely identical GBU-15 glide bomb.
The unit price is around 885,000 US dollars.
I'm already looking forward for more great videos from you! Greetings from: 🇩🇪
Thanks a lot my friend :)
The startup sequence is sick tho!
After playing the EF Typhoon with 18 brimstones I think Gaijin needs to relook at how Spawn Costs are calculated. The fact that the best plane in the game can spawn with 18 brimstones for cheaper SP than this thing with these IR missiles or 6 mavericks is crazy. *Edit 18 not 16
18 brimstones*
@@Liverpool2102MHB TY
@@Liverpool2102MHB TY
not just that, and F-4F ICE with just two mavericks would cost the same SP as an F-15 with full load out of mavericks and glide bombs with air-to-air missiles.
peak balance
The brimstonenes aren't as good as the mavericks because you have to launch them all individually. The f15 has more kill potential before getting shot down. The f15e is still probably the best plane right now anyway
aim120 can be launched at ground targets that are tracked by the f15e radar in the appropriate mode, but they do not cause damage
“Goodbye Young Freedom.”
“NOOO-“
*Smited by the hand of God (WSO)*
I love it how most cas players haven't even considered flying low and using precision strike ammunition from close range
The AGM-88 HARM and it's replacement the AARGM-ER are Mach 2 missiles. It's more likely that WT will add the AGM-88 because the AARGM-ER is only a couple of years old and hasn't really been fielded yet.
This video needs the AC04 soundtrack desperately, especially the desert mission.
The AGM-158XR would be nice to see,it has about an 1000km range and is a stealth cruise missile so it would go undetected on the pantsir’s radar. It unfortunately is subsonic but that wouldn’t matter due to its stealth :)
Is it available in war thunder?
@@andrewfebriyanto3936 not yet but hopefully soon
AGM that goes mach 2? the AGM-88 would be one of those, but Gaijin is afaik not interested in adding anti radiation munition soon
They aren’t interested in modeling non-Russian Mach 2 AGMs
that was badass
I found with tv weapons you can point lock a spot a target is and once the weapon gets into track lock range it will start tracking the target and you can point lock with the TGP farther then the seeker head can lock. Weird you can’t point lock in the seeker but you can in the TGP.
Sure my friend, TV weapons can track vehicles mid flight if the target stayed inside the FOV of the weapon seeker.
Hi Hunter! you asked about NATO missiles, I can't say for European powers but US could potentially see AGM-84E SLAM on the A-6E and future F/A-18C (potentially even S-3 Viking), or the upgraded AGM-84H SLAM-ER which could come to the F-15E and later F/A-18E Super Hornet. The SLAM is a modified AGM-84 Harpoon ASM with the IR seeker head of the AGM-65F and INS taken from the AGM-62. These both however are still subsonic as far as I know :(
Yeah, amazing missile but still subsonic.
@@Hunter_i86 Gaijin are more than determined to not add supersonic ATGMs to any other nation it seems other than Russia, they have KH-29T to the JH-7A in the Chinese tree when in reality China have their own domestic homebrew ATGM the KD-88 they have "to much range" according to Gaijin of 180km they fly at .9 mach and in the last 30km they accelerate to Mach 1.3. China also have a slew of Supersonic ATGMS and ASM but Gaijin state they have no place in the game in every issue report.
@Hunter, now its time to recreate the satellite shoot down😎
thanks mate :D
No problem 👍
Hunter, what do you think about the TOR-M1 at 11.0? Is it justified or is it a monster now?
hmmm that means 10.0 aircraft might face it! Sounds very challenging for planes like Su-25A and A-10 Early but not impossible I guess, pilots will need to stay far.
@ Challenging for sure!
Nearly done with grinding F-111A, I'm so close to F-15E I can taste it :D
AGM-88 3:29
i do know a NATO mach 3 missile but it has 600km range and is nuclear... so sadly i don't think it will ever get added (ASMPA-R)
Haha that's a little bit too much for War Thunder, thanks for the heads-up :)
Шикарный баланс от улиток , особенно прикол с ограничением по скорости
I hate this -rigged scam- game but your videos are always relaxing to watch. This one in particular reminds me of when I played Jane's F-15, in the late 90s =)
Cool! Vateran gamer 👍
I miss the 90s games
@@Hunter_i86 Damn, I miss them so much too ! Also, do you remember Comanche 3, F-16 vs. MiG-29, Combat Flight Simulator, F-22 and most of Novalogic games ? 🥰
thx~
Please do a video with the new UPAB-3000 on the Su-34!
Is the missile good at countering pansir, in your opinion, Hunter?
No, it is slow like PGM. It is better to be used against tanks.
@@Hunter_i86 thanks for the reply!
would be cool to have an excel sheet with all the useful infos like the track range etc
How are you able to zoom incrementally with the TGP?
Mouse wheel zoom axis
Thank you, Hunter.
Ideal weapon to Ace Combat 8.
40 years of F-15E in 2026 and 30 years of Ace Combat series in 2025.
So basically skipper bombs but on steroids
this thing, IIRC, is supposed to have a datalink, for man in the loop.
I did some search and found out only AGM-130 and AGM-142 was option of tactical standoff A2G missile in USAF inventory until JASSM got introduced. I also found that AGM-142 barely breaks supersonic speed 😂
@Hunter AGM84 SLAM, look at the info about this missile. That one has Link-16 (DATA-link)
Great missile but still subsonic
@Hunter_i86 NATO developing more technical advanced systems than fast ones, Data-link systems, laser code.. Only one Hellfire Longbow is much worth
Isn't AGM-130 a GBU-15 with rocket booster? I thought the seeker would be better
They changed it now\today, to AGM-130A-12 with IR seeker.
@@Hunter_i86 I see, thanks for the information (But it use the Maverick pylons... Is AGM-65D a better choice over any other weapons for the wing pylons? Most of the time I mean)
Hunter, How do you zoom in and out so smoothly like that in tgp?? I want to know the method plz!
mouse wheel zoom axis
Hi Hunter like always nice video and I am really sad again because my friend and I are argueing about the grind again I talked with him yesterday that it is only a game and since we aren´t playing together anymore he should ignore what I am grinding but I said yes again to no grinding the Eurofighter and that was very very stupid but have a very nice day my friend. One more question what do you think is better the Eurofighter or the Rafale?
Hello, EF is amazing, the performance of this plane is futuristic haha. I love the Hammer on Rafale too.
Dude, play whatever you like and ignore the haters.
@@Hunter_i86 Yeah I am already thinking about what I am gonna do for two days now
AGM-88 would be nice
The 15e should get some paveway 4's, it could carry them irl and they are already in game so there's no reason not to.
عاشو كابتن اني اصور حته الصواريخ الروسيه نفسها اذا هاجمت بيها البانتسير ايضا راح يكدر يدمرها بس هاذ الصاروخ الامريكي قوي للدبابات نفس ما ذكرت انته حلهم الوحيد يضيفون صواريخ مضاده للرادارات مثل (HARM 88).
حبيبي هاني اشكرك .. برأيي المتواضع الدفاع الجوي الان مو قوي لدرجة نحتاج صواريخ اخماد راداري، اذا ضافوا صواريخ مضادة للرادارات رح نحتاج الى منظومات دفاع جوي متقدمة اكثر وهذا الشي رح يصير بالسنة القادمة، حسب ما صرحوا بالموقع .. بصراحة اني ادعم هذا القرار لان الدعم الجوي القريب الان مسيطر ويحتاج الى رادع اكبر بالطرف المضاد، اكبر من البانتسير أس واحد
I had a nice 11 kill game with about 9 kills with the a7d on mostly sams. Lots of missiles dodged that game 😅
Nice! well done pilot, upload it if you can :)
@ I actually get to go home for the first time so I’ll have a ton of time 😄
to my knowledge only The HARM with mach 1.8+ would be a good counter for the KH38
Looks like just the HARM and AARGM missiles can really do some fast air to ground missions. The SiAW likely can too but it’s not in service until 2026 or late next year.
But can the harm even see a pantsir radar?
All radars have emitions, the entire purpose of the harm is to see a radar like a pantsirs
@ Yeah, I’m just not sure if there’s a limit to what bands or frequencies it can see or not. I saw a war Thunder forum post saying it couldn’t. But idk
There’s different seekerhead for each harm missile that are loaded on preflight unless it’s the most modern one that can see all bands at once. So before each game you’d have to pick the seeker that can see the pantsirs radar mode but if you pick that one it may not work against other aa.
could you please do a A-4N Ayit sim video? :)
Did they intentionally move the vapor cone model or is it just a glitch? Either way I wish they'd put it back :/
I think it is a glitch, it is very noticeable on Eurofighter.
What is a better US agm that could be added?
I have a question. How can I use the AIM120A to hit low-altitude aircraft?
I mean, if they introduce the AGM-130 alongside the F-111F in Update 2.39 and allow the Aardvark to carry four AGM-130s simultaneously, just like in real life, I’d be interested in trying it out.
However, the current situation makes it seem unnecessary to use.
Well there is a version of the Slam er with the Maverick ir seekerhead which would be possible for f18 and a6
Is it better than AGM 65? What do you think you'll use if you use one of the two?
Honestly, kind of a sidegrade to the AGM-65G. Bigger explosive, but it’s bigger and slower.
why do you turn off ur radar. does that help them not detecting you aswel?
or is just to get a more clear screen?
To stay hidden on enemy RWR
I saw this on F111F and was wondering what it was and wanted to unlock it
Could add harms or shrikes that would balance the crap out of a pantsir
i mean we got KH38s and spikes but US still dont have the AGM-114L Hellfire LongBow. only Stalinium material can be fast.
The AGM longbow is 16 non smoke able missiles, are you okay or something, they aren't even close to the same and on a small more nimbal helicopter, it would be like unlocking the kh 38mt and giving LMUR missiles to ka 52, mi 28nm
Now these are fine, but the Brimstones have to be laser guided!
Well adding their own radar would be too op for its own good team kills would be massive and ir version never existed
@@Adailyteaconsumer There are countless weapons in the game that don't function the way they do irl. They've also limited the potential of weapons before, whether it be their range or other aspects. If Gaijin actually valued realism more, then it'd be a different story.
These are actively missing the ability to guide them after launch from stand off ranges. The brimstone’s are NOT the only thing missing it’s irl capabilities
@@theliteralworst9416 nobody said they were
im kinda noob, but why do you turn off your radar? Does it help in any way?
To stay hidden on enemy planes and helicopters RWRs.
@@Hunter_i86 and then somehow you almost instantly know if enemy plane is in the air. Switching to aim-120b and launching.. how do you do that? Amazing job man!! Im watching your videos and learning a lot!
So we can counter Pantsir or what?
One missile that NATO has had since the 80’ that would absolutely destroy SPAA is the The AGM-88 HARM (High-speed Anti-Radiation Missile). With crazy stats like: Low-level - 13 nmi (25 km)
Medium-level - 43 nmi (80 km)
Standoff - 80 nmi (148 km)
AGM-88G - 160 nmi (300 km)
Maximum speed
Mach 2.9 (987 m/s; 3238 ft/s) I see why it hasn’t been added…….yet.
Beautiful
Merhaba dostum ef200 ve rafaele ile cas videosu çekmeyi düşünüyor musun
Hello friend, sure :)
What does ATK mean on RWR? Ataka? for Helos?
Attacker, it can be Tornado, S-24 and F-111.
The way it got implemented is SO stupid. The AGM-130 was always meant to be deployed at standoff ranges, and then being driven by the WSO with MITL datalink, to lock onto the target and hit it. We should be allowed to switch to the weapons camera with V’ and steer it in, with similar keybinds to the other guided MCLOS missiles and guided bombs, or like the AGM-12. The way it’s done is really disappointing, I don’t even care to grind for it now in my F111F..
I mean yes, but also no. Who wants to get killed by a remotely guided missile that they have literally no chance to attack the firing aircraft?
@ if that’s the argument, then don’t add it to the game, but there’s plenty of other weapons that are just as busted, if not worse. Trying to balance things without making it too gamey and unrealistic is a slipper slope. Honestly I forget there’s not many of us who play sim, this is where I would like to use it. But the way it’s implemented would make it useless to use in air sim, and unfortunate really because it’s a cool weapon.
Spikes would be so powerful if they gave us this mode as well
The kh 38mt can do this as well but they didn't add it be glad
@@223frankthetankit is a cool weapon but the kh 38mt which Americans hate also features this meaning even more broken
Why aren’t some nations given TV-guided missiles saying “this is a balance,” while others are given everything at once and that’s normal?
They changed this missile to IR version today.
how can your laser pod see further than 20km?
It can't, that was just for test purposes. If I move the sight one pixel it will get destabilized.
@ oh ok
Hunter How many SP to push f15 with agm 130 ?
It is counted as TV\IR missile SP cost, like Maverick G.
We could get the agm-88 F/A18 and the f16c
to me (a low tier player) it looks like a gbu combined with an agm
Yup a guided bomb with a strap-on rocket motor is just an AGM
could have been a cool weapon if it didnt replace mavericks position
sadly, most of the mach 2+ missiles tend to be for SEAD.....and really only that, so anyways, i will still like my AGM-76 yes
you should try 7 gbu 31 loadout or 2 gbu 15v2 with 4 aim 120, gbu 15 is cheap and reliable.
Nice idea!
AGM88s to counter Pantsir would be huge....
It would be too strong for other spaa's if they add anti radiation missiles
@ release along side other top tier spaas to match Pantsir
@@DaSteeJ07 what nato shorad can match the pancir
@ SLAMRAAM
@@DaSteeJ07 all the ones i found require a separate radar and fire control station. Is there a all in one vehicle?
agm-84 with ir tracker would be the counter to kh38 but there is no pics of it on f15 only the radar variant aka the harpoon on the korean and saudi f15 also slam-er would be good but its speed is low
by the way they have the gbu 53 is in the files it would be a good addition u can spam them but like the other winged bomb but with ir lock
AGM-84 is subsonic
AGM-84H/K SLAM-ER Maximum speed 855km/h (0.7 Mach), it is slow. I asked about NATO Mach 2 missiles.
@@Hunter_i86 AGM-142 is about Mach 1.1 and unfortunately, no other A2G ordinances with standoff capability for US is JASSM. I believe it's because USAF's precautious doctrine of eliminate enemy guided AA assets out before send in the planes with precision guided munitions. AGM-88 series and AGM-78 series retained the Mach 2.9 max speed while other mass produced AGMs speed ROC did not required Super/Hypersonic speed.
@@Hunter_i86 TLDR : AGM-88 series is the only Mach 2 capable A2G in US and its associated allied countries because they all got influenced doctrine of massive air interdiction before sending tactical jets into the battlefield for precision strikes. Before Anti-Radiation missile is here, western hemisphere ranged A2G guidance weaponry is indeed will stay inferior...
Missile just got changed to AGM0130A-12 which has IR seeker
Roger
@@Hunter_i86 Did you try the Su-27SM after the "somewhat" fix
thing is rather good at dogfighting now,
and Su-34 doesn't lose that much speed after a turn now
instead of dropping to 300, now it maintains 450 km/h
I don’t see a point in this thing. The flight range means nothing if it can’t track
Can AGM-130 be suspended together with AIM-120?
Yes
@ NICEEEEE, but why it is forbidden with laser bombs and GBU-15?
NATO Mach 2 missile like Kh-38MT?
Storm Shadow/SCALP-EG? but 0.8 mach
AGM-154? but 0.8 mach too
Not very unique compared to Maverick which is Mach 0.9.
but yall dont get ur misslie bombs removed
A.k.a blue ferret
It's probably not gonna lock that far cause the game barely supports sight stabilization beyond 30km lol
When SU-34 with its new FAB-3000? 💥💣