The Syzygy: Anima and Animus, by Carl Jung (full-audio)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 сер 2017
  • Carl Jung discusses the anima and animus: their part in the conscious and unconscious mind, the psyche in general, and their effects in human relationships. From the Collected Work of C.G. Jung Volume 9, Part 2, Aion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 78

  • @SGSteeves
    @SGSteeves 3 роки тому +6

    You rule! Thank you for this.

  • @Metaphyical0samak
    @Metaphyical0samak Рік тому

    Thank you for this much gratitude

  • @christoffersjogrentrombone3913
    @christoffersjogrentrombone3913 4 роки тому +2

    Great work!! Thx!

  • @NumbaOneBuddhaSmoka
    @NumbaOneBuddhaSmoka 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you

  • @wmka
    @wmka 3 роки тому +3

    Thank you for reading. Have a great day.

  • @katarzyna2478
    @katarzyna2478 4 роки тому +7

    The figure of mother is both omnipotent and significant for both genders.

    • @kirstinstrand6292
      @kirstinstrand6292 2 роки тому +2

      yes

    • @Apollo440
      @Apollo440 4 місяці тому

      I think that, by describing the function of the Anima to the male, and of the Animus to the female, and linking them to the mother and father figures in their lives, Jung didn't say, what was deemed obvious during his lifetime - that everybody has a leading side, which is male or female, which is defined by who the person is born as, biologically (genetically). Jung, in this (audio)book, mentions, that the more a figure is unconscious, the more power it has. Therefore, the mother plays a greater role for the male, because she represents the unconscious anima in him. For the female, the "anima" side is obvious and therefore has less power over her, while the animus is hidden, making the father figure more powerful for her.

  • @mistakenmillenial6834
    @mistakenmillenial6834 4 роки тому +12

    Gosh it’s so complicated.

    • @amzyahmed313
      @amzyahmed313 4 місяці тому

      Tell me about it... I keep jumping back. Fascinating stuff

  • @frederickhoward5598
    @frederickhoward5598 5 років тому +5

    Listen without prejudice and bias....

  • @mrmoeezali
    @mrmoeezali 6 років тому +12

    Great content, thank you. Can you maybe post full audio of Aion?

    • @azaleaslight7243
      @azaleaslight7243 2 роки тому +1

      Uberboyo on UA-cam does

    • @gildedpeahen876
      @gildedpeahen876 Рік тому +1

      Just search the audio it’s on UA-cam, I listened last week actually

  • @Katharsis540
    @Katharsis540 2 роки тому

    Great Channel Username.

  • @badmantv3629
    @badmantv3629 5 років тому +12

    This is too intense

  • @mythnow
    @mythnow 6 років тому +5

    RAD!

  • @davidwetzel5144
    @davidwetzel5144 4 роки тому +4

    Huge if true

  • @MRS54899
    @MRS54899 3 роки тому +1

    "Know thy self" to act or to react?

  • @elite_lurker7589
    @elite_lurker7589 3 роки тому +2

    You’re a great reader

  • @DJSTOEK
    @DJSTOEK 5 місяців тому

    ❤❤

  • @nickolast5655
    @nickolast5655 4 роки тому +1

    I am ! Iam !

  • @scottkraft1062
    @scottkraft1062 3 роки тому +9

    I raised my kids by myself there 15 and my daughter is studying to be a engineer and her girlfriend is an artist while my 15 son studying to be a analytical psychologist and there both 2nd degree black belts in taekwondo and my son wrestlers for his high school we takes walks to heal each other

    • @emptyendeavor2762
      @emptyendeavor2762 2 роки тому +4

      Uhm…. Ok

    • @florentn7442
      @florentn7442 2 роки тому +3

      They’re smoking crack secretly

    • @kirstinstrand6292
      @kirstinstrand6292 2 роки тому +1

      Good job raising productivity and good sense in your offspring!

    • @florentn7442
      @florentn7442 Рік тому +1

      @@spiritrefuge no she died of crack overdose a while ago. Now what?

  • @Umurhan999
    @Umurhan999 Рік тому +2

    I am curious as to how all this works with the children of same-sex couples or single parents because it seems to me like the anima and the animus are completely a priori, which would mean all types of binary gendered roles in general and gendered parental roles are a priori. So, what happens to the son of two gay men or the daughter of a single mother about their anima or animus? I don't mean to reject this stuff, I'm honestly a newbie to jungian psychology and am simply curious.

    • @Apollo440
      @Apollo440 4 місяці тому

      I recently found out about such a relationship: The mother is single during the son's lifetime. He finds a girl, from a family with a strong father, she herself being very masculine in behaviour (likes to argue, has a logical mindset, takes challenges head on instead of avoiding trouble intuitively, as a woman would). Now, the mother cannot release the son, playing the role of a victim and totally dominating his life, stealing wherever she can, the attention of him (from his girlfriend) and also receiving financial help (she goes on vacation instead of the guy and his girlfriend). From this, as well from other observations, I presume, that whatever the relationship of the parents is missing, the daughter or son will try to compensate through another relationship. I.e. the lack of a mother figure will make the child leaning to a strongly feminine relationship, and vice versa. But this is strictly my seeing of the matter, loosely based on what little I know from Jung's learnings, which are also pretty new to me.

  • @kenmcclellan
    @kenmcclellan 3 роки тому +1

    I was never really convinced the elites knew about the Cosmic Trigger until I saw Jung use the word Szyzygy in his book Aion. And then it was obvious. The Nicene Creed was just code for one really bad day in your near future.

    • @kenmcclellan
      @kenmcclellan 3 роки тому +4

      @@Reiman33 ​ There is precious little you won't understand if you say the words slowly. The word is Szyzygy in the time of the Aion (a time that began for us with the birth of Saturn on Halloween of 2012). An alignment of celestial objects to be considered the Holy Trinity. The alignment will be of three or four objects. One is a blue star known by the ancients as Father or Mother. One is a giant planet known as the Son of God if you look in your most ancient texts (Sanchoniathon for instance). One is a red star known as Mother or Son depending on whom you read. One is our Sun that was sometimes known as the Mother or the Son (again depending on whom you read). The secret is from the 1st Council of Constantinople: "And in the Holy Ghost, the Lord and Giver of life, who proceedeth from the Father, who with the Father and the Son together is worshiped and glorified, who spake by the prophets." Again, think szyzygy. Blue Star has Jupiter in a tidal lock and is on the outside (his orbit is 14 years whereas Jupiter is about 12). Sun lines up with us as well about mid-February. Which leaves the pupil in the Eye of God, the red star that has Venus in a tidal lock. Who proceeds from the Father and the Son? The Son of Man. The red star that has a special relationship with Orion and the 1st Point of Aries. Seek the wisdom of the Maya or Ojuelos de Jalisco. The Vatican will never tell you.

    • @ayesha8809
      @ayesha8809 10 місяців тому +1

      Can you say in plain terms what you're talking about?

    • @kenmcclellan
      @kenmcclellan 10 місяців тому

      I can try. Robert Anton Wilson wrote a trilogy called Cosmic Trigger. In Vol 3, he suggests that on the big day, Sirius will nova. It's like the point of the religions, the secret reason for vesica piscis designs and all that. Jung was also an illuminati. In his book, he talks about a gathering of the planets. Jesus does the same when he talks about the next seven months between the Queen of the South rising in judgment and the Sign of Jonas. In the Filioque of the Nicene Creed, there is a suggestion that the Holy Spirit will "proceed from the Father and the Son." And that's an incredibly old notion that a celestial object we haven't seen in thousands of years is about to appear between Saturn and Jupiter. Probably what Jesus referred to, saying: if I be lifted up from the Earth, I will draw all men unto me.@@ayesha8809

  • @Mrchygozman
    @Mrchygozman 2 роки тому +4

    He who knows himself knows God

    • @devinschuler333
      @devinschuler333 2 роки тому

      I don’t think you can completely know god. Anyone who says they know it all, knows little. He who knows he knows little, knows. This of course, is my opinion

    • @Mrchygozman
      @Mrchygozman 2 роки тому +2

      @@devinschuler333 u are misunderstanding the statement. It means that its so complex understanding urself spiritually, psychologically and physically that u will come close to understanding God in mastering urself.

    • @kirstinstrand6292
      @kirstinstrand6292 2 роки тому +1

      Yes, because God is within.
      Just my feelings.

  • @exactly3053
    @exactly3053 3 роки тому +2

    My question is will we ever get together?

  • @MsHburnett
    @MsHburnett 5 років тому +1

    I do hear him describing his life with his wife female colleagues and his lover

    • @solz2636
      @solz2636 4 роки тому +1

      Pragmatic evidence is required regardless of the field youre in

  • @williampena1055
    @williampena1055 3 роки тому

    THIMK!?! Make corrections.

  • @timothyacker8686
    @timothyacker8686 Рік тому +1

    🧲✴️♥️💥💖⚓🏁🏺1111.....

  • @kirstinstrand6292
    @kirstinstrand6292 2 роки тому +1

    Did Jung incorporate Freud's Oedipal complex into his Archetypes?
    Did Freud address Jung's understanding of Animus and Anima Archtypes ?
    In my mind, the ideal Psychoanalyst would incorporate these primary Theories into an integrated Analysis. Freud and Jung ought to be unified, or minimally, not divided. Am I speaking from my Anima, or Animus? LOL

    • @huntertaylor4935
      @huntertaylor4935 11 місяців тому

      As far as I know there are many freud ideas in jungs, specifically the anima and animus to answer ur question. I’m fairly certain at least

    • @RealDealContent-th3do
      @RealDealContent-th3do 9 місяців тому

      No, you're just speaking on subjects you so clearly know NOTHING about!
      Jung advancements in Psychology/ Analytical Psychology far outweigh anything Freud ever achieved / gave to Humanity!
      Jung was conscious of ALL of Freud's theories and incorporated the TRUE one's into his own Psychology, into his own SELF.
      And
      It's simply Anima IF you're Male and Animus if you're Female.
      You don't have both dumb dumb.
      Please educate yourself before trying to sound the smart ass!
      Thank you.

  • @johannesmaliranta
    @johannesmaliranta 5 років тому +13

    Good content and great channel, but unfortunately it's impossible to listen to these due to the way too intensive reading. You should relax more, so that it wouldn't be necessary for such strong inhales that can be heard on the audio track.

  • @Syzygy77
    @Syzygy77 Рік тому

    Anima and Animus possessed people seem ubiquitous these days. Including myself… sadly.

  • @r0n1n-
    @r0n1n- 6 років тому

    Wut?

  • @adrianaslund8605
    @adrianaslund8605 Рік тому +2

    Near the end I feel like he starts to dwell on his bitterness with arguing with women. I can relate to it but I think it might be socially reinforced. I do believe men tend to be more object oriented and women more people oriented. It might be that women are less likely to tell their more entitled peers to toughen up growing up. Ive been on UA-cam long enough to see men acting extremely stubbornly and irrationaly when presented with information and women who are quite stoic. Im listening to a podcast about Simone Weil and she seems quite rational and open minded. It might be that women are better off incorporating Baruch Spinoza's idea that you need positive emotion to counter negative emotion. Instead of shrugging it off like someone inured to boyish jargon or who sees it as part of the objective world. Like someone would shrug off rain. Ironically. I feel Carl Jung is projecting. I don't think women are exclusively closed off to it.

    • @johnstewart7025
      @johnstewart7025 Рік тому +1

      I agree. But his larger point seems to be each sex has a stereotypical thinking mode, but also minor subordinate mode, which is the primary mode of the opposite sex.

    • @Apollo440
      @Apollo440 4 місяці тому

      I hope I understand you correctly, that being said, I think you misunderstand what Jung is saying: He doesn't mean, as I see it, that men have one set of values, and women have the other. He simply calls a set of values as being male or female, by their statistical occurence. Let's say, male are more logic thinking, and female are more intuitive. This doesn't mean that there are no intiution-forward men, no. This simply means, that, because of the biological role of a female, she has to be intuitive, so not to put herself and the children in danger. Male has to use logic in problem solving and warfare. Remember, that Jung came up with many of his theories by observation of "uncivilized" tribes, where the male-female roles are distinctly split up.

  • @descartesdonkey4291
    @descartesdonkey4291 3 роки тому +7

    This is so badly read that real nuance is lost.

    • @bt9124
      @bt9124 3 роки тому

      It needs to be slower too. It's just as when someone tells a poem fast because they have it off by heart. Who is the communication for if not the listener?!

    • @Apollo440
      @Apollo440 4 місяці тому

      @@bt9124 UA-cam has a speed function built in, even as low as 0.25, which can be set in the lower right corner of the video screen.

    • @kevinking9804
      @kevinking9804 3 місяці тому

      Read it yourself then