Carl Gustav Jung - Approaching The Unconscious - Psychology audiobooks

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 жов 2024
  • Carl Jung - Approaching The Unconscious - Free psychology audiobooks.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 566

  • @SamuelFord88
    @SamuelFord88 2 роки тому +51

    "Carl jung gives answers to questions that nobody else even knew existed" - Jordan Peterson

    • @CurtisWilliams-j3c
      @CurtisWilliams-j3c 11 місяців тому

      Same

    • @8Mev
      @8Mev 18 днів тому

      Talent is hitting a target nobody else can hit, genius is hitting a target nobody else can see - cit. some famous guy of whom I forgot the name

    • @SamuelFord88
      @SamuelFord88 18 днів тому

      @@8Mev Schopenhauer

    • @tremarctosornatus2460
      @tremarctosornatus2460 3 дні тому

      ​😅😅😅😅😊😅😊😊😊😊😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😅😊😊😅😊😅😅😅😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😮😮😊😮😊😅😅😢😅😢😅😢😅😅😅😢🎉😢😅🎉😮🎉😢😢😅🎉😢😅😢🎉🎉😮🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉🎉😅🎉😅😅😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉

    • @tremarctosornatus2460
      @tremarctosornatus2460 3 дні тому

      ​😅😅😅😅😊😅😊😊😊😊😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😅😊😊😅😊😅😅😅😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😮😮😊😮😊😅😅😢😅😢😅😢😅😅😅😢🎉😢😅🎉😮🎉😢😢😅🎉😢😅😢🎉🎉😮🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉🎉😅🎉😅😅😅🎉😅🎉😅🎉🎉😅

  • @SanchoBohemian007
    @SanchoBohemian007 3 роки тому +74

    Wow! This 2 hours listening and I re-evaluated my past. Went into deep thoughts at work. Realize that as a kid I used to question everything but got shut down since my mother couldn’t understand. Made me quite but he. This man. This man confirms my beliefs and the thinking of when I was 7 yrs old.
    He literally made me turn back time with this one. And as the video kept going. I was taken back. We are all not far from within us to truly understand our owns elf’s.

    • @SanchoBohemian007
      @SanchoBohemian007 3 роки тому +2

      @Dino tubers gaming yes indeed man. Its been a great experience listening to Peterson.
      Just wants to make you keep going even if the Monsters you gotta face are harder and harder.

    • @SanchoBohemian007
      @SanchoBohemian007 3 роки тому

      @Dino tubers gaming omg haha 😂🤣🤣 dude 😫 i have so many replies I though we was talking about JP haha 😆

    • @acceptinglife6491
      @acceptinglife6491 2 роки тому +1

      Love that for you 👊🏾

    • @seanposner8884
      @seanposner8884 2 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/-8WekZ6D-qM/v-deo.html

  • @SantiYounger
    @SantiYounger 4 роки тому +136

    amazing book, I'll share some of my unedited notes and bookmarks
    35:00 unconsious memories
    36:00 unconsious creative plagerism
    47:00 dreams and reasons
    1:00:00 dream symbol reference books are bullshit, it depends on the individual
    1:00:02 Carl's example of dream
    1:16:00 problems with Freud
    1:35:00 instinct
    1:36:00 action the reason
    1:42:00

  • @varolussalsanclar1163
    @varolussalsanclar1163 Рік тому +5

    Greatest thinker of modern times. If you read Jung and nothing else, you will pretty much everything there is to know about the human experience.

  • @IsabelRodriguez-nv2ue
    @IsabelRodriguez-nv2ue Рік тому +6

    Thank you very much for providing this amazing and very insightful audio-book. Jung's studies are truly remarkable and very helpful in understanding our own psyche. Thanks!
    1:04 - SIGNS & SYMBOLS
    1:25 - ARCHETYPES
    1:43 Mythology example tribe in Africa - the meaning of spitting
    1:47:30 "Where there is a will, there is a way" analysis
    2:04 - INTUITION 2:05 The Role of Symbols

  • @elainebowen5234
    @elainebowen5234 3 роки тому +27

    My mum had two brain seizures and my dad died there 40 years ago.
    My mum lives and with no cognitive loss, but she was in a kind of coma and we knew she was aware.
    Awoke a day half later speaking and eyes opened. Shows me the power of positivity.
    I am very reflective anyway. Others may not be so, we are all different.

  • @goodkawz
    @goodkawz 2 роки тому +9

    Awesome job of reading.
    Feels like I’m listening to Jung himself.

  • @andyprado9884
    @andyprado9884 4 роки тому +44

    Carl Jung was brilliant. Thank you for posting.

    • @tomlxyz
      @tomlxyz 3 роки тому

      What about Carl Alt

  • @ariannam4635
    @ariannam4635 4 роки тому +30

    Oh my gosh thank you so much for posting this!!!! Every time I go to a new library I search for his books but can’t find them. I’m beyond happy - when I saw this audiobook on my recommended, it brought a huge smile to my face that I’m still holding!!!:)

    • @paulwarwick1511
      @paulwarwick1511 4 роки тому +1

      Same!

    • @Pablo-br7hb
      @Pablo-br7hb 3 роки тому +1

      our libraries are closed here so I also rely on this option.

    • @TheWorldTeacher
      @TheWorldTeacher 3 роки тому +7

      Good Girl! 👌
      02. A BRIEF SYNOPSIS OF “LIFE”:
      Everything, both perceptible and imperceptible - that is, any gross or subtle OBJECT within the material universe which can ever be perceived with the cognitive faculties, plus the SUBJECT (the observer of all phenomena) - is to what most persons generally refer when they use the term “God”, since they usually conceive of the Primeval Creator as being the Perfect Person, and “God” (capitalized) is a personal epithet of the Unconditioned Absolute. However, this anthropomorphized conception of The Absolute is a fictional character of divers mythologies.
      According to most every enlightened sage in the history of this planet, the Ultimate Reality is, far more logically, Impersonal Absolute NOTHINGNESS (otherwise called “The Tao”, “The Great Spirit”, “Brahman”, “Pure Consciousness”, “Eternal Awareness”, “Independent Existence”, “The Ground of All Being”, “Uncaused Nature”, “The Undifferentiated Substratum of Reality”, “The Unified Field”, et cetera).
      In other words, rather than the Supreme Truth being a separate Blissful, Supra-Conscious Being (The Godhead Himself or The Goddess), Ultimate Reality is Eternal-Existence Limitless-Awareness Unconditional-Peace ITSELF.
      Because the Unmanifested Absolute is infinite creative potentiality, “it” actualizes as EVERYTHING, in the form of temporary, cyclical universes. In the case of our particular universe, we reside in a cosmos consisting of space-time, matter and energy, without, of course, neglecting the most fundamental dimension of existence (i.e. conscious awareness - although, “it” is, being the subject, by literal definition, non-existent).
      Just as a knife cannot cut itself, nor the mind comprehend itself, nor the eyes see themselves, The Absolute cannot know Itself (or at least objectively EXPERIENCE Itself), and so, has manifested this phenomenal universe within Itself for the purpose of experiencing Itself, particularly through the lives of self-aware beings, such as we sophisticated humans. Therefore, this world of duality is really just a play of consciousness within Consciousness, in the same way that a dream is a person's sleeping narrative set within the life-story of an 'awakened' individual.
      APPARENTLY, this phenomenal universe was created with the primal act (the so-called “Big Bang”), which started, supposedly, as a minute, slightly uneven ball of light, which in turn, was instigated, ultimately, by Extra-Temporal Supra-Consciousness. From that first deed, every motion or action that has ever occurred has been a direct (though, almost exclusively, an indirect) result of it.
      Just as all the extant energy in the universe was once contained within the inchoate singularity, Infinite Consciousness was NECESSARILY present at the beginning of the universe, and is in no way an epiphenomenon of a neural network. Discrete consciousness, on the other hand, is entirely dependent on the neurological faculty of individual animals (the more highly-evolved the species, the greater its cognitive abilities).
      “Sarvam khalvidam brahma” (a Sanskrit maxim from the “Chandogya Upanishad”, meaning ‘all this is indeed Brahman’ or ‘everything is the Universal Self alone’). There is NAUGHT but Eternal Being, Conscious Awareness, Causeless Peace - and you are, quintessentially, that!
      This “Theory of Everything” can be more succinctly expressed by the mathematical equation:
      E=A͚ (Everything equates to Infinite Awareness).
      HUMANS are essentially this Eternally-Aware-Peace, acting through an extraordinarily-complex biological organism, comprised of the eight rudimentary elements - pseudo-ego (the assumed sense of self), intellect, mind, solids, liquids, gases, heat (fire), and ether (three-dimensional space). When one peers into a mirror, one doesn’t normally mistake the reflected image to be one’s real self, yet that is how we humans conventionally view our ever-mutating forms. We are, rather, in a fundamental sense, that which witnesses all transitory appearances.
      Everything which can be presently perceived, both tangible and immaterial, including we human beings, is a culmination of that primary manifestation. That is the most accurate and rational explanation for “karma” - everything was preordained from the initial spark, and every action since has unfolded as it was predestined in ETERNITY, via an ever-forward-moving trajectory. The notion of retributive (“tit for tat”) karma is just that - an unverified belief. Likewise, the notion of a distinct, reincarnating “soul” or “spirit” is largely a fallacious belief.
      Whatever state in which we currently find ourselves, is the result of two factors - our genetic make-up at conception and our present-life conditioning (which may include mutating genetic code). Every choice ever made by every human and non-human animal was determined by those two factors ALONE. Therefore, free-will is purely illusory, despite what most believe.
      As a consequence of residing within this dualistic universe, we experience a lifelong series of fluctuating, transient pleasures and pains, which can take the form of physical, emotional, and/or financial pleasure or pain. Surprisingly to most, suffering and pain are NOT synonymous.
      Suffering is due to a false sense of personal 'doership' - the belief that one is a separate, independent author of one’s thoughts, emotions, and deeds, and that, likewise, other persons are autonomous agents, with complete volition to act, think, and feel as they wish. Another way of stating the same concept is: suffering is due to the intellect being unwilling or unable to accept life as it manifests moment by moment.
      There are five SYMPTOMS of suffering, all of which are psychological in nature:
      1. Guilt
      2. Blame
      3. Pride
      4. Anxiety
      5. Regrets about the past and expectations for the future
      These types of suffering are the result of not properly understanding what was explained above - that life is a series of happenings and NOT caused by the individual living beings. No living creature, including Homo sapiens, has personal free-will. There is only the Universal, Divine Will at play, acting through every body, to which William Shakespeare famously alluded when he scribed “All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players.”
      The human organism is essentially a biopsychological machine, comprised of the five gross material elements and the three subtle material elements, listed above.
      The ANTIDOTE to all mental anguish is to firstly discern pain from suffering, then to achieve complete relief from that miserable state of existence, by abandoning the erroneous belief in personal authorship, and abiding in the primordial sense of being (the unqualified “I am”, which is one's core identity). This is the very same peace which is experienced each night during the dreamless phase of the sleep cycle. This 'resting imperturbably as Flawless Awareness' can be practiced on a regular basis, until it is fully assimilated and integrated into one's life.
      Every person, from time immemorial, has been either intentionally or unwittingly seeking such causeless peace, most commonly by practicing one of the four systems of YOGA (religion) delineated in the sixteenth chapter of this work, or else in creating wealth and the acquisition of material possessions, or in psycho-physical pleasures. That peace of mind is often referred to as “happiness”, “joy”, or “love”, and often presumed to be a temporal state, since many assume, incorrectly, that continuous peace is unavailable in this life.
      Fortunately, that is not the case - it is eminently possible to live one's life acquainted with unbroken peace of mind, if destined.
      Following DHARMA (frameworks of authentic religion and societal duties) is not guaranteed to achieve that desired tranquillity of mind, but even so, it is beneficial for individuals, since it establishes a structure which enables one to more easily elevate oneself beyond the mundane, animalistic platform (i.e. the base pursuits of eating, sleeping and mating). Intrinsic to dharma is the division of the adult male population into the four classes of society and the inherent role of girls and women in society, as fully elucidated in latter chapters of this Holy Scripture.
      So, now that you understand life, and the reason why we are suffering here in this (ostensively) material universe, you are now able to be liberated from all mental suffering, RIGHT?
      WRONG! It is imperative to approach an authentic spiritual master to assist you to come to the above realization, by slowly undoing your past conditioning. Just as you have been conditioned over an entire lifetime to think one way, you need to be re-conditioned to think another way (in alignment with your essential identity as The Divine). For one who has himself for a teacher, that man has a veritable fool as his teacher.
      Even if you adhere closely to the precepts of a competent teacher, you may still not come to a full understanding of life, but if you are sincere, humble and dedicated, you will definitely find more peace in your daily life - all of which was DESTINED to occur, of course.
      Furthermore, if you are suitably-qualified and it was ordained, you may be fortunate enough to receive discipline from one of the EXTREMELY rare fully-enlightened masters residing on earth at any given time (perchance even the current World Teacher himself), and subsequently realize the aforementioned fundamental concepts, by diligently studying authoritative doctrines (especially the most accurate and complete of all extant Scriptures, this “Final Instruction Sheet for Humanity”), serving your guru with great reverence and devotion, and by deliberately avoiding undue harm to oneself, to other individuals, to society as a whole, and to the natural environment.
      ☮️

    • @aspects8645
      @aspects8645 3 роки тому

      @@TheWorldTeacher where you get this from?

  • @Lalallalu
    @Lalallalu 2 роки тому +16

    Phenomenal reader - hugely important and relevant analysis.
    Thank you a million for posting this audible book by one of the greatest minds of the last century 🏆🙏

  • @robnewsome9086
    @robnewsome9086 3 роки тому +15

    The brilliant intellect of this man amazes me, his perception is uncanny and natural intuition is amazing. I would have loved to have met him and have a conversation about the individual self

  • @MrJamesdryable
    @MrJamesdryable 4 роки тому +26

    I'm 5 minutes in and he's already blowing my mind with things that on some level I already knew.

    • @philjohnson4607
      @philjohnson4607 3 роки тому

      Easy feeding your ego

    • @MrJamesdryable
      @MrJamesdryable 3 роки тому +7

      @@philjohnson4607 I think you're over analysing my comment, friend.

    • @90inside45
      @90inside45 3 роки тому +4

      @@philjohnson4607 and what would you know of his ego based on a single sentence

    • @seanposner8884
      @seanposner8884 2 роки тому +1

      @@90inside45 it's ok, just phil's ego being phil's ego. --- sean's ego

    • @seanposner8884
      @seanposner8884 2 роки тому

      ..."ergo..."...

  • @elainebowen5234
    @elainebowen5234 3 роки тому +8

    Brilliant, illuminated events in hospital and my response to it and those nearby. Very good. Thank you.

  • @garypowell1540
    @garypowell1540 4 роки тому +4

    There are in my experience 4 basic types of dreams.
    1. Where the origins and reasons for them are often mundane and obvious.
    2. Where a bit of simple or more convoluting analysis, more or less explains them.
    3. Lucid Dreams, which are of the first or second variety, which you can direct or somehow participate in if you know how to do it.
    4. These can scare the crap out of you, or be pleasant, seemingly magical, indeed awe inspiring, but you have absolutely no idea where they come from. None of the content seems to have any relationship to your present mood, any conscious thought or experience you have ever had. In my own case these come and go, are reasonably rare, and never repeat themselves.
    To me they seem to come from without, like I am being either attacked from outside, or some other form of consciousness is making an attempt to either posses, influence, or express itself using my own subconscious. I surmise that I have a natural resistance to this kind of thing, which is why they never come back or repeat themselves. Something tried to get in, but was swiftly given the finger, so simply gave up and possibly went for easier pickings.
    However it does make me also think what could be the case with other people who are more open to this kind of outside interference as the content is often extremely vivid and imaginative, if not also a little nightmarish in its magnificence. Authors such as Tolkien, and musicians such as Mozart, claimed that they took their ideas from dreams. Perhaps this is the sort of possed experience that they were referring to.

  • @JoshAlicea1229
    @JoshAlicea1229 3 роки тому +6

    We are affected by EVERYTHING! How we develop deeply depends on what we surround ourselves with

    • @vesnaya999
      @vesnaya999 2 роки тому +1

      U gotta swim no matter what water u r thrown in. U can not sterilize the surrounding.

  • @elpintor0218
    @elpintor0218 3 роки тому +6

    Gracias maestro Carl Gustav Young yo solo acabe la primaria y desde ke tuve un trauma psicológico no se como llegué a lo ke buscaba con sus enseñanzas gracias.

  • @DarkManBeatzUrFace
    @DarkManBeatzUrFace Рік тому +1

    Love learning about psychologically

  • @Happyheart146
    @Happyheart146 4 роки тому +10

    Thank you for posting this. It has been very helpful and gets people talking!

    • @susysilvia4037
      @susysilvia4037 4 роки тому

      Thank you for sharing this book!!!

    • @billyboomstick8657
      @billyboomstick8657 3 роки тому

      Talking about what?

    • @Happyheart146
      @Happyheart146 3 роки тому

      @@billyboomstick8657 for example, how most mental health professionals haven't got a clue what they're doing. How they choose to throw dangerous and detrimental mind altering drugs at people because it's all they know.

    • @Happyheart146
      @Happyheart146 3 роки тому

      Perhaps read the next thread.

  • @lodawg5996
    @lodawg5996 2 роки тому +1

    Something brought me here! Im at work barley working listening to this!🔥🌟🕊

  • @sydneymorey6059
    @sydneymorey6059 4 роки тому +6

    Descartes says, I think, therefore I am. So lots to think about with Carl Jung.

  • @MetalNick
    @MetalNick 3 роки тому +15

    Growing up I had a lot of dreams about falling from very high distances. Then as an adult I started having the recurring theme of what I can only call falling upward, where I can't stay on the ground. I don't know exactly what makes me go up into the air, but it gets intense. I think I left the atmosphere one time. It's all very vague. I haven't had one of those dreams in a while, but I suspect my unconscious was expressing a feeling of not being grounded, or not feeling secure. But it's not like the sort of fear that occurs in dreams of falling from great heights. Not being able to get back onto ground is more confusing than frightening I suppose. Anyways, the idea of some kind of insecurity being symbolized feels accurate.

    • @jennzenn971
      @jennzenn971 3 роки тому +3

      Have you heard of lucid dreaming? It sounds like you had a lucid dream. There's lots of video's on utube about it.

    • @duljava
      @duljava 3 роки тому +2

      I had those dreams of going up too many times through my life

    • @codemiesterbeats
      @codemiesterbeats 2 роки тому +1

      I used to have very similar dreams... I have had many dreams where I was "uncomfortable" but only a very limited few where i was "scared" as in nightmares...
      Some people find it hard to believe I have never had a nightmare but to me a nightmare is a bit of an odd concept.
      I have had a few falling experiences (some were actually linked to falling in the real world) but I only got that "loosing your stomach" sensation just as I wake up.
      I have been known to WAKE in a bit of fear (for some reason being awaken in a moving car always does this to me) it is always brief but I imagine that fear for a split second while waking up is close to the fear that people experience in nightmares but the time frame is probably longer.
      In my "falling upward" dreams there was a time when I was younger where it seemed as if things were a bit out of control and in fact some of those dreams were accompanied by spinning around or movement that seemed as if you were playing a game with the controller being upside down or in a weird configuration. It was like once I started spinning I was unable to stop until I woke up (one of those dreams that are probably closest to a nightmare) I don't recall going to heights too extreme, maybe 20 feet at the most.
      At some point I started having lucid dreams where I was aware I was dreaming. I found myself speaking to one of those "procedurally generated" fake people in my dream who was speaking to me in their own speaking voice but was suddenly interrupted by MY speaking voice that boldy said "you're dreaming!" I am not sure how all of that works but it was like the instant off switch for "maintaining the facade of reality" I was much more in control.
      In the more lucid dreams I have occasionally now it seems as if it is a "badge of honor" I can brag about to the procedural nobodies lol "check this out"
      I can float/hover with some degree of intent and can move around (almost like how you float in a pool if you lie back with air in your lungs) I can lie back and relax and it is as if letting go of the thought constraint of "gravity" I can let loose a little.
      Ha ha how lame is that, I can impress fake people in my dreams LOL

    • @niksatan
      @niksatan 2 роки тому +1

      this is normal, and usual

    • @alainaaugust1932
      @alainaaugust1932 Рік тому +1

      @@codemiesterbeats From where did you learn dream interpretation? Who/what are procedurally generated dream people? What would happen if you followed Jung’s example and actively imagined they were real? I realize there is little chance after all this time, Codemiester, that you will read this, but I’ve studied dreams and dreaming and lucidly dreamed since the ‘70’s (at Jung’s prompting) and not heard such terminology. If anyone has an answer, please do answer and I’ll check back from time to time.

  • @emberhydra
    @emberhydra 4 роки тому +9

    So from what I got from this conversation was that dreams are not meaningless and should not be ignored as it may foreshadow something than I understood a bit when he went in with the anima and animus. That's in conclusion what I'm taking from this 2-hour conversation.

    • @CasualDandyAkaSqwrty
      @CasualDandyAkaSqwrty 3 роки тому +2

      Today, it seems like this book should be condensed. But much like what JBP says about people's view of Freud today, both men layed the groundwork for future science. People were not at all convinced of these concepts back then.
      Have a good day, hope this was a helpful perspective.

    • @Lalallalu
      @Lalallalu 2 роки тому

      This conversation?? 😑

  • @margheritapagni
    @margheritapagni 5 років тому +10

    A little dense, but clear as long as you are paying attention to every word. These concepts are not new to me, I read Jung in school, but hearing it verbatim at a time when I am writing my dreams, and wanting a closer relationship to my unconscious, this hits home and not always pleasantly. When we discover, like the patients Jung speaks of, that there is a part of ourselves that is maladapted unbeknownst to us, causing inner tension, negativity, or acting out in certain situations---a COMPLEX!--we must humbly accept we have work to do, first with understanding and then by changing behaviors and habits. Jung teaches a methodology to get to know those hidden parts. I haven't found anything better than the Jungian stuff, although there are many other authors in humanistic psychology (as well as in the analytical school) who give useful handles to increase consciousness of self.
    PS I agree the reader's voice is off putting (to me he sounds patronizing), but at least he has good diction!

    • @jesseguerrero8203
      @jesseguerrero8203 5 років тому +1

      Margherita Pagni what school teaches Jung? If you don’t mind me asking

    • @Happyheart146
      @Happyheart146 4 роки тому

      @@jesseguerrero8203 hahaha, Good question. I'd like to know also!

    • @TheAndrewWray
      @TheAndrewWray 4 роки тому

      more than a little dense!!!

    • @andrewfrankovic6821
      @andrewfrankovic6821 3 роки тому

      @@TheAndrewWray From the very first sentence I'm daydreaming about the terminology. iT's kind of a thing with me listening to any complex theories. I'm not sure if math/science is cherry picking words from the common pool or the common pool cherry picks from math/science or both, but iT's a sort ongoing poisoning of reason with irrational word application. Thank you, religion.

  • @2962-w1k
    @2962-w1k 5 років тому +7

    Born in year of Pig. Will be very good to listen to all this year. We will be attuned to the level of his revelations and gifts to humanity, in my view.

    • @Bulltardwin
      @Bulltardwin 5 років тому +2

      I'm year of the pig too. Does this mean much for our year ahead?

    • @Happyheart146
      @Happyheart146 4 роки тому

      @d b synchronicity maybe..

  • @dannymathis7275
    @dannymathis7275 5 років тому +25

    Thank you! This was presented wonderfully!

  • @eci0
    @eci0 3 роки тому +107

    the voice of the man reading reminds me a lot of Alan Watts

  • @cresenciohernandez8310
    @cresenciohernandez8310 3 роки тому +2

    Love it thank you guys stay safe today and Now. Amen Amen Amen.

  • @jungianshadow4950
    @jungianshadow4950 3 роки тому +15

    I just hope everyone realized this guy literally explained what thought is

    • @jem5431
      @jem5431 3 роки тому +4

      @joe curtin But in The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious, Jung does explain what thought is.

    • @jem5431
      @jem5431 3 роки тому +1

      @joe curtin I deleted my comment because I assumed the typical internet war was upon me haha. I believe you are correct, by the way, regarding the reason for Jung's empiricism. An archetype is the symbolic representation of a pattern of instinctual behavior. They are sort of emergent properties, which constitute the collective unconscious, and become accessible to consciousness through projection. Of course, I'm still figuring this stuff out myself. Jung is a wormhole I swear.

    • @jem5431
      @jem5431 3 роки тому

      @joe curtin And then it gets even more strange: "Despite the materialistic tendency to understand the psyche as a mere reflection or imprint of physical and chemical processes, there is not a single proof of this hypothesis. Quite the contrary, innumerable facts prove that the psyche translates physical processes into sequences of images which have hardly any recognizable connection with the objective process" (Carl Jung, The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. p. 58).

    • @d.h.9239
      @d.h.9239 3 роки тому +1

      Gnostics did it 2000 years ago.

    • @calvinmerriman6200
      @calvinmerriman6200 3 роки тому

      In his words and opinion yeah but as a fact? Give me a break are we listening yo the same book?

  • @RolexTimex
    @RolexTimex Рік тому +2

    Last year I traveled into my childhood before I was 9 years old.... I didn't know that till I started listening to Jung and his words explained my experience. Alchemical Engineering of the mind and soul.

  • @theone-tg4ey
    @theone-tg4ey 2 роки тому +1

    thank God for carl jung

  • @ronaldoferreira594
    @ronaldoferreira594 2 роки тому +1

    What a present! Thanks.

  • @cybersora
    @cybersora 3 роки тому +4

    Can you allow subtitles ? For me is easier to understand with listening and reading because I'm non - native English speaker.

  • @soljanshametaj2891
    @soljanshametaj2891 3 роки тому +1

    Very interesting, I hope someone can redo this video so it can be a bit better quality,
    I had to listen twice because isn’t very clear enough in the old recording

  • @shoaibanwar5320
    @shoaibanwar5320 4 роки тому +11

    Please add the captions if possible.

  • @allensauce2250
    @allensauce2250 6 років тому +18

    Yay Jung!!! My hero, come to save me from my tower of ignorance! I may not be a Damsel, but heaven knows i be in distress.. Hammering out the conscious experience.. Great stuff!!
    4:42 / 7:50

    • @grarglejobber7941
      @grarglejobber7941 5 років тому

      You're a crazy person, you know.

    • @lamowkachow4597
      @lamowkachow4597 3 роки тому

      @@grarglejobber7941 we're all crazy

    • @grarglejobber7941
      @grarglejobber7941 3 роки тому

      @@lamowkachow4597 Nah it just looks like it to insane people in the same way that someone with an IQ of 50 can't understand the mind of someone with an 100 IQ. Sad but true.

  • @johnblasiak607
    @johnblasiak607 5 років тому +13

    Awesome 👏 it’s like being a fly on a spiderweb when and if you ever go to a psychiatrist or psychologist or listen to these deep complex mind investigators and investigations !

    • @lrj4422
      @lrj4422 4 роки тому

      U wot m8

    • @MetalNick
      @MetalNick 3 роки тому

      @QQminusS Interesting but psychologists and psychiatrists can't be dismissed outright I think. I can say outright, having seen them for almost 25 years of my life, that I don't just get told what to think and then try to adapt to the sensibilities I see my therapist has. I have seen the same psychologist for more than 10 years and I don't expect to ever fully see things with the same framing as he does 100% of the time. I understand being careful about narratives suggested and posited by professionals, but I think we should also be careful not to assume being a patient of psychiatry and psychology means having a disposition that can be easily manipulated.

  • @mikesizemore5939
    @mikesizemore5939 4 роки тому +1

    I love this narrator's voice. Jung was great.

  • @HoovyTube
    @HoovyTube Рік тому

    1:31:27 Archetypes. 😊

  • @riversol1
    @riversol1 5 років тому +4

    Enjoyed it very much

  • @arturonavarrosanchez7162
    @arturonavarrosanchez7162 4 роки тому +2

    Amazing sharing ... thanks

  • @birdsong879
    @birdsong879 3 роки тому +2

    Thanks for shade this. I really appreciate it. 🌹

  • @GiovannatheSTRONG
    @GiovannatheSTRONG Рік тому +1

    1:54:42 My goodness! This describes perfectly the pain of life.

  • @unknownunknowns2300
    @unknownunknowns2300 4 роки тому +18

    Last night I dreamed that A.O.C gave me a demeaning lecture about all the reasons that I qualify as a loser. She had a list of power points and went down them one by one. And she was right
    It had the finality type vibe like a courtroom and a judgement was being passed.

    • @Icemanactual
      @Icemanactual 4 роки тому +13

      Sounds like the beginning of a great porn movie.

    • @unknownunknowns2300
      @unknownunknowns2300 4 роки тому +1

      @Gotthatgoin4me
      Now that's the whole truth and the truth and nothing but and I am far right of Center and even though the woman's politics are absurd, she is a dime!

    • @unknownunknowns2300
      @unknownunknowns2300 4 роки тому +1

      @Gotthatgoin4me
      And that was 7 months ago and I haven't been laid since!!!!!

    • @andrewfrankovic6821
      @andrewfrankovic6821 3 роки тому +1

      I just recently caught up to this A.O.C. reference and I find iT utterly abhorrent. On the other hand I learned to spell abhorrent.

    • @robertjay9415
      @robertjay9415 3 роки тому

      I find this great experience fascinating and wrought with awe. To be subsumed in a career politician, to use the graceful touch of a women’s manipulation and create a self gratifying sense of reality, when you see how easily you give in to tantalizing urges compelled or triggered for such advances, having made without one’s own realization. It becomes too easy in all that remains, in motivated gains.

  • @kamalpreetsingh1686
    @kamalpreetsingh1686 4 роки тому +2

    Great psychologist Carl Gustav Jung.....

  • @miliasmoonlet1849
    @miliasmoonlet1849 3 роки тому +2

    something about his writing is all off to me.

  • @ChristianelHermano
    @ChristianelHermano 4 роки тому +5

    Meeting the Self ... Ego finding it’s Lover....transcendence comes through union with the anima / animus though the kundalini

  • @Happyheart146
    @Happyheart146 4 роки тому +121

    If only we had psychologists like Jung, today.
    Unfortunately, only 60 years or so after this, it seems everything has been watered down and 'they' (the anylists today) don't want to acknowledge/aren't educated enough, to help people who are 'overtly' aware of their own subconscious...
    Never mind the poets and the artists, let alone the psychics..!
    I'm apparently a schizophrenic, and yet every psychiatrist or psychologist, mental health nurse or doctor, I've ever had the misfortune to engage with, has never heard of Jung!!!
    In 18 years!!
    or so they claim.. Can you believe that?
    I mean, fuck me!
    Seriously?!! They haven't got the origins of the word 'psyche' from which gives them their fucking job titles?
    and not one of them heard of Jung?!
    - Bollocks!! I don't think so.
    They're just pretending they haven't.
    Or maybe they just don't know? Maybe it's been kept from them? Demoted to a pseudo science... but how can they miss this? They're still practicing after all...
    They deny we need salt but still prescribe 'Epilem' - Why..? They know salt is good for the frontal lobe, that's why, but they will continue to refuse to acknowledge it.
    And they get paid to pump us full of anti psychotics/anti depressants and not tell us about the subsequent, long term, side effects, i.e Parkinson's (disease) shakes/break down of the nervous system, premature dementure, decrease in the grey matter etc..
    Hopefully a psychiatrist or psychologist will read this and realise, we are well aware...
    What a fucking disgrace!
    Synchronicity - "Little tickets from the universe" - Carl Gustav Jung.
    Well, I'll keep my little tickets, and the so called doctors can shove their meds up their arse.
    Goodnight.

    • @elenilouarasi2828
      @elenilouarasi2828 4 роки тому +13

      There are only few, that appreciate the work of Nietzsche, Freud (known as the “Father of psychology”), also friend and college of Jung...yet you couldn’t be more right of the rest of the scientists in that topic! As in all matters, knowledge doesn’t seam to have the same value as glamour, I guess the one with the most views or likes is the greatest! There is a lot of truth in Russian literature too, for example Dostoyevsky’s work too, yet you know:
      “nowadays people know the price of everything but the value of nothing”! Take care and stay true🌻

    • @ruatapungawhare-pounamu4050
      @ruatapungawhare-pounamu4050 4 роки тому +8

      That’s fucked and I think psychology needs to be re-evaluated.

    • @501promo
      @501promo 4 роки тому +14

      Posing for paychecks. All the kids are doing it these days. They go to school and learn just enough to get the checks and then they fake the rest, while they hide behind the unearned respect their feilds and titles obnoxiously demand. Makes me sick to my stomach.

    • @elenilouarasi2828
      @elenilouarasi2828 4 роки тому +17

      Buster Wranks Schools aren’t interesting of teaching more than that either, so if a person is truly interested in knowledge, has to get curious and walk alone all the way! Good day☺️

    • @501promo
      @501promo 4 роки тому +8

      @@elenilouarasi2828 Exactly.

  • @danielwynn1826
    @danielwynn1826 Рік тому +1

    I sure wish he would have said subconscious everytime he said unconscious because I truly believe that's what he meant

  • @DaKloneLiving
    @DaKloneLiving 4 роки тому +4

    thank you for uploading this

  • @yongsuanlin6255
    @yongsuanlin6255 2 роки тому

    🙏🇸🇬bring me back to my undergrad . Graduate and Phd time.

  • @VenusLover17
    @VenusLover17 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for this

  • @Cyanid3Child
    @Cyanid3Child Рік тому

    I've had a similar recurring dream to Carls about his childhood home with new rooms.

  • @suelisocallaghan
    @suelisocallaghan 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you so much for sharing :)

  • @renehenriksen1735
    @renehenriksen1735 4 роки тому +5

    Carl Jung - The Master Brainbender :)

  • @yulia7396
    @yulia7396 Рік тому

    Well detailed

  • @isaywhatisay...7185
    @isaywhatisay...7185 3 роки тому +3

    "All is mind universe is mental, and your heart is in the center of the whole universe. "
    ⚖️

  • @Eternalised
    @Eternalised 3 роки тому +1

    "Whoever denies the existence of the unconscious is in fact assuming that our present knowledge of the psyche is total. And this belief is clearly just as false as the assumption that we know all that there is to be known about the natural universe. Our psyche is part of nature and its enigma is as limitless. Thus we cannot define either the pysche or nature. We can merely state what we believe them to be and describe as best we can how they function [...] 'There is no unconscious' - Those who say such things merely express an age old misoneism..."

    • @uncleusuh
      @uncleusuh 3 роки тому +1

      Didn’t think I would find you here. Hello?

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised 3 роки тому

      @@uncleusuh hello :)

  • @Replicant2600
    @Replicant2600 3 роки тому

    The utility of creating purpose for your life, how you get there seems to be a choice of presented truths that you have to choose.

  • @kasunlee7489
    @kasunlee7489 4 роки тому +3

    Jung was a brave brave man. And certainty colorful. I think his acquaintances and friends should have find him as a very interesting man, who entertained them wherever he went. Well that my mental image of him at least.

  • @suzann5312
    @suzann5312 3 роки тому

    Interesting to hear about his difficulties with Freud.

  • @carrieqingzigong6483
    @carrieqingzigong6483 3 роки тому +1

    thank you so much for uploading this

  • @Cleveland_Chris
    @Cleveland_Chris 4 роки тому +4

    Some people fall asleep to music. I fall asleep to this guy. We are not the same.

  • @MrELIZABHET
    @MrELIZABHET 4 роки тому +5

    Podrían subtitular los videos? Sería de gran utilidad para muchos .Gracias !

    • @danieljones741
      @danieljones741 Рік тому

      ...oh you poor thing, i'm so lucky to have chosen liverpool to have been born in and can speak the language of the Germans, where i live now. Very often, i've wished the same for things like French films, the radio and so on😎👍

  • @moeinkasraei2114
    @moeinkasraei2114 4 роки тому +1

    بهترین الگو برای اشنایی با چگونگی عالم اسطوره کلاسهای پیروان یونگ است ،فول که شدی برو سراغ اسطوره شناسی نه در چهار چوب یونگ که تحقیقی و وسیع
    در ضمن اشنایی با مکتب یونگ زیارت و تجارت است ،برای سلامتی ذهن عالی است

  • @dannewth225
    @dannewth225 3 роки тому +1

    Unconscious is not an entity. It's just programming we do without a decision process.

  • @selflove96
    @selflove96 2 роки тому

    Thanks for sharing

  • @grandstandguy
    @grandstandguy 2 роки тому +1

    I like to listen to this as I'm falling asleep. I feel I might learn more somehow.

  • @Enigma96969
    @Enigma96969 3 роки тому +131

    Any INTJ’s out there learning psychology for fun? :p

    • @Baztha
      @Baztha 3 роки тому +3

      🙇🏻‍♂️🙎🏻‍♂️🧖🏻‍♂️🦸🏻‍♂️🗣🎙👫🏻👥🔜🗽
      I.N.F J.

    • @driftwood757
      @driftwood757 3 роки тому +22

      Myers Briggs is a very unreliable and scientifically unsound personality assessment.

    • @d.h.9239
      @d.h.9239 3 роки тому +7

      @@driftwood757 I also tend to see MB as you stated, but I am not certain that it is completely erroneous. I think MB side steps the very important and useful maxim which is "the truth hurts". MB probably does alright in directing or influencing individuals to go about some path which best suits their personality without crushing their feelings with words like neuroticism, or even agreeableness in the case of men. The big 5 is not for the faint of heart.

    • @driftwood757
      @driftwood757 3 роки тому +10

      @@d.h.9239 It's not like you're big 5 traits are locked in. As a person with free agency, you can work to reduce your agreeableness if it's a little too high. Neuroticism can often be worked on and reduced as well through therapy, confidence building life events, etc. Personality can be optimized and improved upon. Staying in la la land with Myers Briggs or astrology gives you no tools or wherewithal to do so

    • @d.h.9239
      @d.h.9239 3 роки тому +2

      @@driftwood757 I know. I'm saying most people can't handle it. Thats why you wont find HR departments utilizing the big 5 when counseling employees in corrective action meetings regarding interpersonal conflicts when they arise. Can you imagine? "Karen, we need to talk to you about your conflicts with Bob. Lets go over personality types to have a better perspective on how to improve this situation. Here is a diagram explaining personality types. You seem to fall heavy in neuroticism" Karen would have a break down lol... Personally, I don't use the MB, but I do think it can provide a minor benefit for those people who are too sensitive or just not ready for the big 5. Big 5 is for serious ppl doing serious work with others or on themselves.

  • @erdftzgh
    @erdftzgh 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you

  • @jpy2102
    @jpy2102 5 років тому +8

    Thank you, but multiple skips and apparent missing parts.

  • @TheWhitehiker
    @TheWhitehiker 3 роки тому

    Well read, good selection.

  • @siresquire9439
    @siresquire9439 4 роки тому +18

    You don’t have a soul. You are a soul that has a body.” :-)

    • @aminetanouyat9643
      @aminetanouyat9643 4 роки тому +3

      You are neither

    • @aminetanouyat9643
      @aminetanouyat9643 4 роки тому

      @Sir Platepus what do you mean ?

    • @aminetanouyat9643
      @aminetanouyat9643 4 роки тому

      @Sir Platepus A soul is an imagined entity, and the body is only a fraction of what you are.

    • @siresquire9439
      @siresquire9439 4 роки тому +1

      @@AK-yx3qf Yeah, well, I've had half a bottle of Scotch, what'd you expect? 😉😁

  • @ಜಾನಪದಜಗತ್ತು
    @ಜಾನಪದಜಗತ್ತು 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks..

  • @codemiesterbeats
    @codemiesterbeats 2 роки тому

    1:01:21 so weird that I used to have a similar dream... at an extended family member's house the upstairs was blocked off and I had dreams that there was this labyrinth like structure of balconies that had very little to mention as far as interesting things... just more or less wooden railings with slats but nonetheless this dream reoccurred into my teenage years.

  • @Surveilancepredators
    @Surveilancepredators 2 роки тому

    I miss my Mom and Dad they inspired me.

  • @jethypendl
    @jethypendl 4 роки тому +1

    Time stamps would be a good idea.

  • @Heidiaf
    @Heidiaf 2 роки тому +2

    Jung would be so mad at dream interpretation books/ websites now hahaha

  • @teresarelish6704
    @teresarelish6704 5 років тому +11

    What about dreaming with shadows

    • @tomlxyz
      @tomlxyz 3 роки тому +5

      You didn't understand

    • @macabreenterprise1823
      @macabreenterprise1823 3 роки тому

      @@tomlxyz I don’t blame her, I have to rewind every few seconds to listen again

  • @TheSageCommander
    @TheSageCommander 5 років тому +4

    Bookmark 28:00

  • @jujuisnot
    @jujuisnot 4 роки тому

    I love this thanks so much

  • @deirdreegan420
    @deirdreegan420 2 роки тому

    This man's wisdoms lights me up🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @bsurajraju
    @bsurajraju 4 роки тому +2

    1:35:30

  • @yellowquantum4240
    @yellowquantum4240 3 роки тому +1

    We use symbols and structures to see and believe that we are in reality and not in psychosis.

  • @lolguytiger45
    @lolguytiger45 3 роки тому +1

    36:15 he says that the book with the ships log was published in "85, half a century before Nietzsche wrote" but Zarathustra was published between 1883-85. I don't understand.

    • @ScattMatt3000
      @ScattMatt3000 3 роки тому

      Different literary work

    • @Innocent_Villain
      @Innocent_Villain 3 роки тому

      That is a bad edit. This is a heavily edited copy of the audio. Listen to the complete audio in the "Individuation Portal" channel's upload, and you will see that it says "1835".

    • @michaelmcfadden396
      @michaelmcfadden396 10 місяців тому

      I think the example used a Nietzsche paragraph in "Zarathustra" that almost perfectly matched a book from 50 years before the book was published by Nietzsche.
      Jung said he spoke to Nietzsche's sister or something and she said they had read the book.

  • @venkatasaitarunkasiraju1721
    @venkatasaitarunkasiraju1721 3 роки тому +1

    Not many have read this book have they?

  • @lilibrindacier2759
    @lilibrindacier2759 2 роки тому

    Hélas ! Trois fois hélas ! Mon anglais n’est pas suffisant que pour pouvoir le suivre dans la langue de Shakespeare !

  • @maibemiles3904
    @maibemiles3904 3 роки тому +5

    I have gone through a particularly tough time the last few weeks... I wonder to what degree outside forces, beyond my control maybe, are playing a role in how I feel... I honestly get the feeling that there’s people around me, maybe my neighbors perhaps that are going through these same waves of depression... and I’m picking up those energy waves or if it’s just me... it might be... but given what I’m learning in my occult studies it might be something bigger than just little old me. Today watching a stream after something was said I had a thought and though I didn’t put it in chat a few others did and it was clear that we all heard the streamer says something that lead us to having the exact same thought... so does an idea or thoughts that occur to you; are any of them truly your own?... I think the cosmic forces of nature that make up this physical realm we call earth might be the strings and us the puppets a little more than we’d like to admit... anyways if you whoever you are, are out there struggling too just know it’s not entirely you and that it will pass just keep your head up and keep on keeping on. 🤷‍♂️ It’s all we have... I think the next few years whatever is happening with the planets, the sun and earth will have some difficult and different energies (strange alignments and eclipses in March/April 2024 for ex)influencing us and it could get worse before it gets better so hang in there!

    • @Lalallalu
      @Lalallalu 2 роки тому

      Thanks for sharing this

    • @VaughanMcCue
      @VaughanMcCue 2 роки тому

      I know this is a year later, and I suggest you look into some books by Michael Shermer. Why People Believe Weird Things, for example.
      Thanks for contributing a comprehensive insight into your experiences. I wish you well.

  • @danieljones741
    @danieljones741 Рік тому

    ..."the hand", open palmed, came whooshing into my face "no! It doesn't work like that, do that and it won't work!" with these words the message was not to put a bet on the result of a football final game. Since then other results have been revealed, i've had very seldom such dreams but they've come true. As they developed they had more to interpret but the first one was "united won the cup", just that, just these words, as words in my thoughts, nothing more. United beat my team.

  • @Bibi-ty1vd
    @Bibi-ty1vd 3 роки тому

    Associacion s thinking is the opposite to the diassociation of self. but both are part of our Personality,

  • @reaganwiles_art
    @reaganwiles_art 2 роки тому

    Bella Bella! Grazie!

  • @octavioorozco1606
    @octavioorozco1606 5 років тому +3

    52:00

  • @arelymacias5355
    @arelymacias5355 2 роки тому

    Is this the name of the book ?I don’t know much but very interested

  • @paulodigitalmarketing
    @paulodigitalmarketing 4 роки тому +1

    51:07 / 2:31:19

  • @andrewfleming389
    @andrewfleming389 6 років тому +38

    Let's get unconscious honey.

  • @sirakgeez-m.h4139
    @sirakgeez-m.h4139 4 роки тому

    great job

  • @roberthenderson8780
    @roberthenderson8780 4 роки тому +2

    It's. A. Puzzle. -. That's. What.
    Life. Is...

  • @jc8258
    @jc8258 3 роки тому +1

    Monday March 15th 2021 1:37 a. M.

  • @albionmeraj6119
    @albionmeraj6119 5 років тому +5

    please answer below!!!!!!!! is this thought right i dont know what to learn and to know anymore ::::::::i think subconscius to conscious is like space filled and empty (empty space doesnt exist but im taking it as an example) subconscious is continuous like the space when it is empty i mean with no elements, consciousness is when elements are put in the empty space and its not empty anymore, to view the world subconsciously you need to clear the elements from the empty space, and in the road it is felt like the more elements you are clearing the more you are approaching a subconsious view of the world, in the subconscious view of the world there are no ideas no adaptation thoughts, no ego no emotions, just the real you, if you were the first ever human created, you are just the creation and the feeling will be like the creation, the more time passes the more conscious humans are getting, subconscious is nothing but its the reality and once in a time humanity need to be that and not forget its self, animals are closer to subconscious than us,

    • @bidenator9760
      @bidenator9760 5 років тому +1

      Right on. It's interesting how similar that assessment is to the way Buddhists see the unconscious and subconscious.

    • @albionmeraj6119
      @albionmeraj6119 5 років тому +1

      @@bidenator9760 im not a budhists but i like their ideas cause they clearly help in humans development towards their light

    • @andyprado9884
      @andyprado9884 4 роки тому +2

      Jung would never call the unconscious a subconscious that would be assuming that it the unconscious comes second to the ego conscious

    • @Happyheart146
      @Happyheart146 4 роки тому

      True. Maybe the closest we can hope to get these days, would be art. Overall though, we have lost touch with the psyche.

    • @siyaindagulag.
      @siyaindagulag. 3 роки тому

      Instinct . AKA , animal consciousness .
      Intuition - small but not insignificant part of an individuals personal unconsciousness .
      Hope this helps .

  • @MrJamiedude
    @MrJamiedude 4 роки тому +3

    Is this from "Man and his Symbols" ?

    • @erraticchromatic
      @erraticchromatic 4 роки тому +1

      I believe it is. Approaching the unconscious was Jung's final literary contribution before his death in 1961 . it is part 1 of "man and his symbols" , not a stand alone book.

    • @stian.t
      @stian.t 4 роки тому +2

      It is. It is the first of 5 parts (+ conclusion) in Man and His Symbols. But it seems to have been edited somehow, maybe sanitized, in several sections.
      (I had the book in front of me while listening.)

  • @camelia9802
    @camelia9802 4 роки тому

    Fascinating