Cessna 170 vs Bearhawk Patrol Comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 лют 2025
  • 👉Take our online PILOT GROUND SCHOOL✈
    www.fly8ma.com
    🛩️Private Pilot:
    -Everything you need to know start to finish
    -How to choose an Instructor
    -How to perform the maneuvers
    -Airspace
    -Landings
    -Oral and Checkride prep (premium version)
    -And so much more! Try it for free with the link below!
    bit.ly/2I3evAd
    🌦️Instrument Pilot Ground School:
    -Learn all the abbreviations and IFR speak
    -Approach Plates and Procedures
    -Airspace
    -Rules and Regulations
    -Systems
    -Real World Scenarios
    -Accident case studies when things went wrong
    -Written test prep
    -Oral and Checkride Prep
    -Etc, Click the link below to check out the course!
    bit.ly/2I3hZTr
    🛫Commercial Pilot Bootcamp:
    -Learn about Holding Out
    -Maintenance Requirements
    -Systems
    -Airspace
    -Rules and Regulations
    -See full oral exams and checkride videos
    bit.ly/2I5W4eo
    👉Check out our many other courses too!✈
    -Tailwheel
    -Crosswind Landings
    -Weather
    -Airspace
    -Seaplane
    -Sport Pilot
    -Spin Awareness
    -Accident Case Studies
    -And more! Click below to see all courses:
    bit.ly/2I4whDp
    #fly8ma #flighttraining #aviation #bushplane
    Your Support Makes our Videos possible! Thank You!
    Support us at: / fly8ma
    Check out our site at www.fly8MA.com
    The FLY8MA.com Free Online Ground School for Sport and Private Pilots is available to everyone as a means to make flying more affordable and increase learning for everyone. We are funded with the help of our viewers and subscribers to our website: www.fly8ma.com and our Patreon page: / fly8ma
    Every dollar helps us to grow our project into a comprehensive online ground school for Sport, Private, Instrument, and Commercial Pilots. We greatly appreciate all of your support and hope you will share us with your friends and family in #aviation.
    FLY SAFE!
    -Jon

КОМЕНТАРІ • 80

  • @sledawgpilot
    @sledawgpilot Рік тому +1

    Pull your prop control all the way out in the glide and feel the immediate difference

  • @kylepace4832
    @kylepace4832 4 роки тому +11

    I like the 170!

  • @sganzerlag
    @sganzerlag 2 роки тому +2

    Both are great back-country planes. For me though, I would go with the 170. I have a soft spot for both the 170 and the 140. Great choice of plane, Steph! Best regards from Brasilia, Brazil.

  • @Nanuknikisuittuk
    @Nanuknikisuittuk 4 роки тому +6

    Come for the planes, stay for the poms. Great video!

  • @uygarbocutoglu4465
    @uygarbocutoglu4465 3 місяці тому

    The last scene rocks bro 👍

  • @renorailfanning5465
    @renorailfanning5465 Рік тому

    I'm pleasantly surprised with the Bearhawks' performance. Granted, I never knew about that plane until a few weeks ago but I assumed it was just like a Super Cub by looking at it.

  • @willnelson5692
    @willnelson5692 3 роки тому

    My first thought on the glide test is the windmilling prop creates a similar drag force on both planes but the proportional effect for the higher mass 170 less.

  • @durwoodhibbard9312
    @durwoodhibbard9312 4 роки тому +1

    If you test again, after doing all test, need to swap pilots and redo the same test.. remove pilots as a variable. Enjoyed the video....Steph seems to be getting more comfortable in front of the camera.

  • @markdoan1472
    @markdoan1472 4 роки тому

    Your really hitting your stride on these aircraft comparisons ... since the vast majority of back country pilots are very much power / technical / equipment / performance geeks your feeding the lion here pretty dang well..

  • @mattwoody1089
    @mattwoody1089 4 роки тому +1

    Hi can you do a comparison to a murphy rebel and or a bushcaddy r80 ps this would be a comparison with nice modern designs

  • @ryanedwards7741
    @ryanedwards7741 4 роки тому +1

    50 year gap and almost no difference when you weigh it all out. Great video thanks. Ill stick with the maule. I think the maule (with the exact same motor) would win in all categories, and certified.

  • @donemory7459
    @donemory7459 4 роки тому +3

    Thumbs-up Steph & Jon! Beautiful country! :-) Don/NE Ohio

  • @glock19gen3
    @glock19gen3 4 роки тому +1

    The New Bearhawk Companion looks killer! Wish there were more details about it

  • @sebastiansund2949
    @sebastiansund2949 4 роки тому +3

    beautiful flying

  • @rwlewko
    @rwlewko 3 роки тому

    I'd be interested in a comparison between a 180hp Bearhawk 4place and this C170.

  • @kevchilton908
    @kevchilton908 4 роки тому +1

    A really interesting video you guys, thank you! Keep up the good work 👌👍

  • @ak_5698
    @ak_5698 4 роки тому

    Nice comparison. Thought that each has its own strengths and weaknesses. Thanks guys

  • @donc9275
    @donc9275 4 роки тому

    December 8, 2020 there are two 170's for sale 1@ $49K and the other @ $50K

  • @KevinRudisill
    @KevinRudisill 4 роки тому +5

    When you are comparing them, do you give the 170 a few extra points for looks?? haha

  • @franck_mee
    @franck_mee 4 роки тому +1

    Well, the 170 has another advantage: it's certified.
    Here in France, with a few exceptions, experimental-like aircraft are restricted from professional activites, discovery flights, instruction, etc. I guess it's different in the US, but here it means if you want to make a living (or just do a few jobs so you don't loose to much money) from flying, having a certified aircraft is mandatory.

    • @watashiandroid8314
      @watashiandroid8314 4 роки тому +1

      It's the same in the US; experimental aircraft cannot be used for compensation or hire. You can get an exception from the FAA, but I have heard it is difficult.

    • @franck_mee
      @franck_mee 4 роки тому

      @@watashiandroid8314 Thanks for the information!

  • @friendme1032
    @friendme1032 4 роки тому +2

    Thank you 💎🌻

  • @tonystewart7287
    @tonystewart7287 Рік тому

    Neat comparison 😎👍

  • @songmaster9308
    @songmaster9308 4 роки тому +3

    Awesome video comparison!

  • @av8rk9
    @av8rk9 4 роки тому +3

    I hope you can find a Super Cub against the Patrol to do the same comparison

  • @scratchbuilder5952
    @scratchbuilder5952 4 роки тому

    Great video... love the Bearhawks

  • @4rebeln8
    @4rebeln8 4 роки тому +2

    I really like the Bearhawk, but do not have the time, tools, area, or expertise to build one. The 170, lots on-line for sale to buy and go flying.

    • @z987k
      @z987k 4 роки тому +2

      I bet you can't find a 170 that tricked out for sale. That's probably one of the best set up 170s in the world. The only thing 170 about it is the fuselage.
      175 wings with extensions and leading edge cuff, 180 gear legs, 180hp o-360(stock is a 145hp o-300), constant speed carbon fiber prop(stock is a fixed pitch aluminum. 29in bushwheels. There's in excess of 100k worth of work done.

    • @4rebeln8
      @4rebeln8 4 роки тому

      z987k I would just buy a normal 170. Couldn’t afford to do all that.

    • @z987k
      @z987k 4 роки тому +1

      @@4rebeln8 Well a normal 170 can't do half what this one can, it's more or less not even the same airplane. A stock 170 is a dog. Fully loaded you're talking 2000ft strips at low density altitude not 5-700.

    • @JW-gb6hq
      @JW-gb6hq Рік тому

      @@z987kdepends on the prop and wing mods. Not at all true.

    • @z987k
      @z987k Рік тому

      @JW-gb6hq way to not read anything I wrote, agree with me and say not true.

  • @pappybo49
    @pappybo49 4 роки тому

    Nice, fun video! I always enjoy your videos!

  • @FF280O
    @FF280O 2 роки тому

    I’m actually surprised at the small differences, with a triple blade prop on the 170, could pick that climb rate up a fair bit, landing distance will be improved with practice. The 170 has just jumped on my radar

    • @escapetarkov3838
      @escapetarkov3838 Рік тому

      Add a stol kit, upgrade the engine to a Injected Lycoming 360 and 100lbs of ballast in the baggage and she should be one heck of a bush plane.

  • @davidandrews1659
    @davidandrews1659 2 роки тому

    Well done BUT! No comparison unless your same wt.!! So what you have done is compare performance with out consideration of wt. Do it again👀

  • @5thGenNativeTexan
    @5thGenNativeTexan 3 роки тому

    Which STC engine conversion is this (on the 170)? Thanks!

  • @pappyscrappy6663
    @pappyscrappy6663 4 роки тому +6

    Shouldn't you be comparing the 170 to the 4 place Bearhawk??

  • @ludvikblondal9885
    @ludvikblondal9885 3 роки тому

    Fuel flow..vs. useful load??

  • @smjamitchell
    @smjamitchell 4 роки тому

    Hi Steph / Jon, Another great video guys, thanks. How does the performance (and weight) of N2962D with all the mods (0-360, Horten kit, landing gear etc) compare to a stock 170B and a 180 ? Also, as someone else mentioned, would be good to do a similar comparison between the Bearhawk Patrol and a PA-18.

  • @RetiredPilot
    @RetiredPilot 3 роки тому

    What engine do you have in the 170B

  • @wiliam7570
    @wiliam7570 4 роки тому +2

    My wife is always asking if I want to upgrade my Cessna 170B to a nicer airplane,, No,, I have the perfect airplane.

  • @k.c.8447
    @k.c.8447 4 роки тому

    Nicely done guys!!

  • @AgeCobra
    @AgeCobra 4 роки тому +1

    For me to carry 4 people with some luggage it would be the 170 and more comfortable on long flights.Don't forget the 170 is a 1956 air plane older than you two.It wasn't designed for bush flying cross country.

  • @gerhardcombrinck7026
    @gerhardcombrinck7026 4 роки тому +3

    Great video!

  • @New2Me170B
    @New2Me170B 3 роки тому

    Port Graham?

    • @New2Me170B
      @New2Me170B 3 роки тому

      Jakolof. Right by Seldovia.

  • @beachside180
    @beachside180 4 роки тому

    Well they are not an early C180 which is the “perfect aeroplane” but they are both pretty damn good. 😏😏😏 .

  • @joshuanewnham3347
    @joshuanewnham3347 4 роки тому

    Cool bro

  • @cr-us9ch
    @cr-us9ch 4 роки тому

    Probably not apples to apples. Should have compared a 180 hp 4 place with the 180b

  • @57eleven1
    @57eleven1 4 роки тому +1

    I know Stephanie won’t be trading her 170 for a Bearhawk. Or, any other plane for that matter. I don’t blame her!

    • @57eleven1
      @57eleven1 4 роки тому +1

      I should’ve mentioned the Bearhawk seems like a great plane too, I know she loves her 170. Oops

  • @danielblanchard5768
    @danielblanchard5768 4 роки тому

    love tue puppies

  • @New2Me170B
    @New2Me170B 3 роки тому

    Now compare it to the 4 place bear hawk.

  • @yesode4201
    @yesode4201 4 роки тому +1

    Next time could you please do a real comparison 300lbs is a big difference. Still a good video.

    • @fly8ma.comflighttraining199
      @fly8ma.comflighttraining199  4 роки тому

      It's a bit tricky to fit 300lbs more of stuff in the BH short of loading sand bags....these are typical loaded weights each flies at going out for a camping trip

  • @alschwartz8732
    @alschwartz8732 4 роки тому +3

    30k difference, I'm thinking 170

    • @fly8ma.comflighttraining199
      @fly8ma.comflighttraining199  4 роки тому +3

      Well one is about 63 years newer than the other and that has a bit of influence on the price...I'm sure the patrol would be a lot more affordable 60 years from now

  • @guretsugu
    @guretsugu 4 роки тому

    I feel like poor 62D was done dirty.

  • @mattivirta
    @mattivirta Рік тому

    my option have who have lot cheapen buy used plane = cessna have.

  • @dashriprock2916
    @dashriprock2916 3 роки тому

    If there are mosquitoes I ain't camping.

  • @mattivirta
    @mattivirta Рік тому

    you must be think how much bear and cessna invest money, bear build kit cost 72000 plus engine maybe about 100 000 all and lot hours build it, and old used cessna 30 000-40 000 and ready to fly. if want cheap only fly cessna have lot lot better, if want build and stay in garage longtime buy bearhavk. my option have cessna i like fly not stay garage build owerprice plane. important have cessna used but good condition ready to fly cost lot lot cheapen half cheapen than bear.

  • @cluelessbeekeeping1322
    @cluelessbeekeeping1322 3 роки тому

    The ChickenHawk is way better.