It may have been harder than you thought for you to make the video - but I 'm happy to say that your conclusion was clearer than I expected and has made my decision much easier: I want to do both, so I'll take the 90D :) Thank you for your help! Update: I've had my 90D for a few weeks and so far I am perfectly happy with it 😊
Great video, Aaron! I think too many people are obsessed over sensor size..especially when it comes to video creators. On my channel I stress the importance of lighting, shot composition, and last but not least, CONTENT! An interesting shot on an average camera is better than a boring/ordinary shot on a top camera.. for anyone reading this comment, let that statement sink in...
I must say, I have been on the fence about which of these to go with, and your case for video+photo has pushed me to the 90D. Thanks so much for this great video!!
@@genecatcher1 More information in smaller space, more compression, more side effects. I think 26mp was already good, the camera looks perfect. I came from Nikon and I think she came to fight with the D500, which is one of the best cameras made by Nikon and is cropped. I never tried it but if it delivers photos with good results over 10 thousand iso because I saw it on the D500.
This was very helpful, especially where you explained that the 90D can accommodate both EF AND EFS lenses... makes me rethink my desire to invest in a full frame camera at the moment... I appreciate it!
Aaron, found your channel over a year ago when I was deciding on getting a DSLR. You helped me choose the t7i and I’ve been real happy with it. It’s great to see your channel growth bro. Keep it up! I’m leaning heavily towards a 6D for image quality and low light picture capabilities. Thanks again!
Thank you, Aaron. This was a very thoughtful review. My focus is photography and not video. But, I'm leaning towards a 90D at the moment due to the fact that I can still use my current lenses. You really given me lots to think about. Thank you again and well done!
Great video as usual. I appreciate how you don't bog down your reviews with specs. They truly are practical. You're so right about the video vs photo. I picked up the 6D Mark II back in November (despite it being an older camera) simply because I knew it would meet my photography needs and I don't do any video at all. Plus at the time they both were the same price and I figured I might as well get the full frame while it was on sale.
Well done. I have been researching this topic for a while now in anticipation of buying a camera/video device. After 100s of hours of UA-cam videos and reviews THIS is the exact conclusion I came to as well. Thanks Aaron.
Thank you. Have watched many videos of comparing these two ones and still couldn’t make a choice but your video was simple and much more detailed than others! Live video comparison sample was exactly what I was looking for! 👍👍👍
Own the 6dII, wouldn't change with a 90D as I do photography, seldom videos. Upgraded from a 60D and love the 'fullframe'. But as a carry around I bought a Fuji X100V recently and also love it. The 90D in photography is better for sports or action though, I guess one hs to know what one wants it for. Both are good choices and no camere fits it all...
I made the right choice then! I don't care about shooting video, I love capturing nature & wildlife photos and i bought 6dmii about a month ago. I think 6d mark ii is great, considering it is the canon's lowest-priced full-frame camera.
I have a 6Dmk2, which I use in conjunction with a 70D for street photography, they work very well together. I'm looking to upgrade the 70D maybe with the 90d… Would be a classic combination me thinks.
I bought the 80D at a great sale price, two years later picked up the 90D for a similar price and have just bought the6D mkII at AU$250 off. Use and love all three cameras...
I'm not a pro, just a hobbyist. For me the major drawback with the 6D II is the 1/4000 shutter speed limitation. If you've ever done high speed sync, then you know this is essential for creativity. And continuous burst limited being limited to 7 FPS.
I have not shot any high speed continuous, but I do a lot of nature and birding, the 7fps work alright for my needs at this point. I still plan on getting the Canon R5 at it's release though, just have to decide which kidney to sell first.
I have to say, this video was very informative, so, thanks. I did want to mention, I'm a pro-photographer and my mentor, partner & best friend, uh, my grandpa, is a Master Photographer with nearly 6 decades behind him. I have a little more than 20 years myself. When we watched the video, you mentioned most "pros" choose a full frame. We know many pros and semi-pros. We all choose the 1.6 crop due to its versatility, compact size and endless features on the fly, and the fact we rarely do video. When we do, we use a drone as it tends to lean toward real estate work. . All of this being said, I've been struggling with going with either the 90D or the 6D MKii. The only "full" frames we own are old 120, 220 and 645 medium film cameras - being way bigger than full frame 35mm. Buying the 6D would be my first full frame DSLR. However, after watching this, I'm leaning toward the 90D, mainly because it's newer and I had no idea the 6D accepted only "some" EF lenses. That's a downer for me. I'm looking for a DSLR that is 30+MP, has a huge lens/attachments selection, and must be capable of rich, sharp, colorful imaging within a reasonable price range. . One last note. 1.6 crop factor vs. full frame at the same MP won't make your 30x40 inch enlargements noticeably better than the other. Pretty much any Canon camera from 18MP and up is fully capable of being enlarged to 30x40in. and still remain sharp. Throw in some AI editing using Topaz Labs DeNoise, Adjust, Mask or Sharpen, or any combo of these, no one will see the difference when looking at the print from the proper distance for the enlargement. . Now, off to look at some more comparison videos using this video as a baseline for the 90D and comp'ing the T7i, T8i and 90D. . Mirrorless cameras are a no-go for me. They just look cheap and toy like, which is good for us. Since so many people are flocking to buy the latest "mirrorless" cams, DSLR prices are dropping - FAST! I love it. . Hope to see more of your vids in the future. . ~Alexa Shaw This Is Saipan
I think you misheard - the 6D Mark ll accepts all EF lenses, while the 90D accepts both EF and EF-S (the lenses specifically made for the crop sensor bodies).
@@ThisIsSaipanCNMI Apologies and that is strange...the whole point of the EF lenses is that they fit all EOS cameras...do you have a link to this info. because I was also looking at this camera. Thank you!
Sir, your camera and equipment reviews are always stellar. It’s most appreciative how you provide real and honest reviews. This one most definitely huts that same mark. It was a hard comparison but thank you for demystifying this curiosity for us enthusiasts. The 90D is most definitely on the purchase list. 😊
I own a 5D mark III and a Canon 00D and I struggle to compare them. I still consider the 5D3 a Pro camera body despite its age and my 90D a ProSumet ca.era body. But I cant help but find myself using the 90D more due to having more features and higher megapixels. However if I want a certain look to my images the 5D3 is the camera I'm going to shoot with. Thete is just something so pleasing with the full frame sensor.
I am so glad to find your video review on these two cameras. i spent hours to find answers on all my questions what camera to pick for my needs. I was hesitating because the cost is pretty similar on used 6d mark ii and new 90d and both cameras are great. But you explained stright to the point all prons and cons of usage in terms of photography and videograpthy. It helped a lot. Thanks for making this video.
I wish the 90D is full frame. That is the only downside for me. I make a lot of hauls and standing videos that requires full shot. Do you think with a good lens, I will be able to make it work? I am confused.
To get a similar enough result, all you have to do is compensate for the cropped field of view with a wider (and faster) lens. I shoot with the M6ii (same guts as 90d). If you want a 35mm full frame look, use a 22-24mm lens. If you want a 24mm look use a 16mm lens, for 16mm a 10mm lens, and so on. Once you get used to calculating for the 1.6x crop factor, it becomes second nature. Also keep in mind the aperture on the cropped sensor lens should open at least one stop wider than the full frame equivalent look you're going for to achieve a similar depth of field. For 90D lenses, I suggest the 24mm pancake and the 10-18mm for those wider shots.
For the past month, i am trying to sell my 90D and get the 6Dii but i am hesitant because I don’t want to lose the video features of the 90D. Now i am keeping my 90D After seeing your vlog. . . And especially now i got myself a 5Div to take care of the photos.. Thanks for the video, new subscriber here from the uae
Thanks very much Aaron, really useful advice. I have an 80d and was thinking of upgrading. All that I read about the 90d, though, was about its video capabilities, but I've only once ever shot video on the 80d. So your comment about going for the 6d for the photography, or the 90d for video work, clinched it for me. The other detail that persuaded me was a diagram I saw of the relative sizes of the aps-c and full-frame sensors.
Camera shopping is really hard to do, especially when your line of work requires you to do both at the same time. I could potentially buy a 90d for video and keep using my 80d for photos, but I need to find a camera with great low-light capabilities.
I love your video, I bought Canon 6D mark 2 and after 3 weeks I have decided to sell it on a second hand market, I am just hugely disappointed with video quality, and this decision was made even before I saw your video. Thank you for honest review.
The 1080p on the 90D is incredibly sharp. It might just be because of youtube compression, but it looked noticeably sharper than the 4k. What picture profile were you using?
THANK YOU SO MUCH! After so many reviews and comparisons you hit all points I was missing to decide between these two cameras. Definitely subscribing to your channel.
If you can't decide, get the 90D. He fails to mention that the 90D also beats the 6D in a very important category, which is dynamic range and it does so by quite a margin. Also, you can get the sigma 18-35mm f1.8 lens for the 90D and there is nothing comparable for the 6D, especially for the price.
@@filip1491 if you plan on doing more video then yes, but if you plan on doing more photography then the 6d m2 is far superior. Dynamic range is important but if agajn its mainly for photography you are going to be editing your RAW photos anyway in which you can recover shadows that may be lost, or over exposed areas.
Just subscribed, great explanation on these two different camera's. I only want full frame but now I am doing Video training and the tracking feature on the 90D is hard to ignore. great video
My 17-35mm 2.8L gets real wide on the full frame. My 75-300 IS gets extra reach on my crop sensor giving me 480mm equivalent. As for video...not there yet.
Thanks for the review. It was super useful as i am considering switching to full frame and did not know that i have to take into account all the extra glass. Helped me a lot ! Keep up the good work!
I own both cameras. I like them both but find myself using the 90D more often. For portraits and low light photography, I use the 6D mark II. For everything else, I use the 90D.
How is the High ISO/low light performance on the 90d? I have the original 6D already and I know its awesome on that camera. Was wondering about that 90d's performance. Thanks
@@danc3746 I love using the 90D but it's low light performance isn't as good as I would like. For lower light situations where I don't want to use a flash, I use my 6D Mark II.
Moving from a t3i that I've been using for 10 years at least it seems,,, I'm struggling to choose a new camera. The 90 interests me slightly more because of lens options, however, I never shoot video and have zero desire to. Perhaps the 6d would be a more realistic choice. Enjoyed your video
Thank you for this video! Super helpful and well made! I've been ready to upgrade and have both cameras in hand and need to make the decision to return one :x I think I'm going with the 6D since I'm mostly serious about photography
PSA - you can convert the mount on the EF-S 10-18mm to EF. Just check eBay. You can then use it on the 6Dii at 14-18mm! Crazy wide view on FF and the vignette isn't that bad. Just don't use it below 14mm or bad things will happen
@@FitsandFun Ha! Yeah, I don't know that I'd have been that brave, lol. Nice comparison video sir! I keep shooting so much film, I'm looking at picking up an EF body again so I can share lenses.
Absolute Brilliant video Aaron, I was confused which one to buy from these two options, As my preference is more to the video I will prefer 90D with Sigma 18-35mm lens. Your video is very beneficial in terms of choice. Thanks for making this video, you are absolutely gem :)
That was my struggle for making this video, I can't go back to a crop for my photography, and yet I can't go back to only 1080p for video. Waiting for a full frame with 90D features and an extra memory card slot.
@@FitsandFun Yeah both cameras has down and up, it all depends on your needs. I would choose 90D instead but you will like EOS R5. It will probably cost $4000 though
@@FitsandFun That's the one i want but it's going to be expensive i heard, i wanted the EOS R but i will wait to see how much the EOS R5 cost. That camera will be a beast but nobody need 8K now, 4K no crap going to be great for videos.
I currently have Canon 60d + Sigma 35mm 1.4 + Canon 50mm 1.8 and do a lot of car photography. To me, it feels a little bit outdated, so I'm looking to upgrade, plus I don't like that it's APSC. Been looking at mirrorless options like Canon RP or R, but I'm not sure, because they're quite expensive and have plenty of cons. Anyone can recommend a decent Canon camera? 90d? Like the one in the video? There's too much choice.
I have the 70D and the 6D Mk II... From my experience, the 70D APSC camera pic IQ can be excellent - if the light is bright enough. This is why I purchased the 6D MkII. It has the Full Frame look, and is just better suited for certain pics. Yes focus tracking on the 90D looks great.. // For photographers: If you are only taking pictures during bright days, the 70D should work out fine for you. 90D (just got one) is newer with more megapixels, thus better in low light. Video is a different comparison.
Aaron, do you have a comparison of 90d and 6d mark ii in low light, fast moving and zooming? I have a canon sl3. I have used it for volunteer work taking pictures and videos for high schoolers performance portfolio (dance, theatre, orchestra and band). They use black box or theatre for their performances. The room is usually dark. I have to max my ISO to 25600 that caused the pictures to be grainy. Any thoughts on which camera is better for taking pictures in my situation? Thank you.
I didn't need to calibrate my second copy of the lens, I traded my first copy back in and tried the Canon 16-35mm f4. Wasn't impressed with that so I went back to another Sigma 35mm f1.4 and the second copy worked great out of the box. Or it was already calibrated before I got it. Sorry.
Great video mr.Aron , Now I know which camera is right for me, your videos always useful. .6D mark ii will be the second camera for me after the T7i, you helped me with both cameras thanks 👍👍
Finally!! I've been searching for this comparison forever now. Thanks for this video. I'm exactly in this dilemma. I am really impressed by the shutter speed, the continuous shooting and the improved focussing system on the 90D but i really would like a full frame as well! I don't think I'll be able to make a decision and be a 100% happy with it but I'm gonna have to do it eitherways.
Shravan Swaminathan Buy a used 6d for 500 bucks and give it a try. Great quality, very affordable. Forget about shutter speed, except you really need it. Take your time, take a slow shooting approach, you will learn more.
After owning my 60D for some years and now the 6Dii, I dont think it is a big deal to have FF just for the sake of having it. Also the field of view vs lens purchases becomes mlre challenging. The middle of the lens range is the same price wise but on the ultra wide and telephoto end is where it changes. You can get amazing quality ultra wide on a crop body (8 and 10mm) for about $600 while with FF the most extreme ultra wide (12 and 11mm) cost 3x as much. The same on the telephoto end but even more expensive because of the crop factor making short telephoto long. The low light is better but most cameras these days do a good job. The largest benefit I think is portrait photography to add that extra backround blur and low light. If that is not specifically a major part of what you shoot, then pick the one that has the features you want most.
You probably will end up with 2 good cameras. A aps-c for long range outdoors photography and a full frame for portrait and artistic photography. At least that keeps the cost down in the big telephoto lenses. The 90d is great for sports and birds, and long range photography. The 6d Ii is going to do better for artistic, portrait, and low light. What ever camera you have now, just get some good glass for, keeping in mind that EF lenses can also be used in your full frame most of the time. I bought a 6d cheap, but every lens I have bought for it cost 2-3 times more than the camera. Wish I had just bit the bullet and bought an R6 mk Ii. Because now to move up I will have to use an adapter. Same with my aps-c. Should have just bought the R7. You're not just buying a camera, you are buying into a system. And changing systems is way more expensive than just a camera. You can take wonderful pictures with a cheap body and good glass. Know exactly what you want to do with your photography. Get the glass you need. Then get the camera for the job. You probably have an asp-c camera now. So when buying glass, if you think you're going for a full frame, make sure your new lenses are capable of being used on a full frame. Unless pro photography is on the horizon, or you're wealthy, I bet you stick to asp-c. And if you're going pro, then just figure on getting into the R series cameras and lenses now. You'll want and need the dual card slots, usb2 SD cards, and those $1,000 + lenses. At least the RF 50mm f/1.8 isn't too bad of a price.
Thanks for your honest opinion, currently ton between these cams, but I think after watching this, I am leaning more towards mark ii considering the type of photography I'm trying to get into. Thanks again!
The 90D is more detail and sharp. But if you come from the era of shooting since 2005 or 2010, there was always the desire to own a FF. Now video means more in Dslr than pictures do but at one time it was reverse.
Thank you for making this video. This is a tough one to decide on because I do professional video but would still like that full frame aesthetic for photography😭
Since you have had crop sensor experience I soul suggest go for the 6d mark ii. I also was using T7i. But then I bought an used 6d original. Huge difference in image quality. The overall look and iso performance is way better in 6d orginal.
I'm planning to purchase a new camera preferably a FF but my 10-22 efs will not be compatible. I'm not looking for a video camera and would be mostly shooting portrait and nature. Which camera do you suggest keeping in mind the lens compatibility.
Came here to say I thought you did a great job on this video, you are too hard on yourself. I bought the EOS90D today just based on this but I know exactly what trade off I am making now. Awesome job! Subbed.
Planning your get a camera for film school. Do you think in 1.5 years there will be a 6d mark iii? Im debating between these two but i hope the 5d mark v comes out soon. Even after watching your video i still cant decide. For film school should i get 90d or 6d mark ii. Im udgrading from a 7d+60d setup with mainly ef(not efs) lenses. Size and portability is not a concern, neither is price
I actually used it yesterday with Canon's webcam utility software, and the picture quality was like I was recording a video in 1080p. I guess the only limitations would be your internet connection and streaming software. The web utility allowed my software to recognize my 90D as a webcam, the software wasn't a stand alone streaming software.
I thought the quality was very similar, if not the same. Definitely a huge upgrade over webcams. Also I love the fact that I could use my 35mm Sigma f1.4 to blur out the background.
@@FitsandFun Quick question. Do you think the lens attributed to the sharpness in the video for 90D? I have 50mm and 18-55mm kit lens and wondering if there is a difference. I had a Lumix G9 and Sigma 18-35mm. The sharpness wasn't that noticeable. Sure for 4K, but not with the lens.
Very good video. I’d like to know can I use 90d for semi-pro photography. I mean shooting the products or something like that. Is the resolution enough? And what is the risk for buying the used camera? Should I go for new one? Or save the money for lens.
I've never owned a FF camera. I'm a serious photographer. The diff is that I know that the cameras are different not better than the other. Once you realize that fact all the FF marketing goes out the window. I'm getting the 90d for the extra detail over my 80d and MP4 4K lite. Which is fine for moi. Basic color correction and a LUT I'm done. I don't have to blow another $1- 1.5K for a new computer.
Hello Arron, I am still unsure of what camera to buy. I seldom use video, mainly on vacation, I shoot wildlife, street scenes and landscapes. I like the fact the Mark ii is full frame, and I don’t lose anything, Which should I choose, Thanks mate !!!
What about the dynamic range issues and autofocus problems every one talks about on the 6d mark ii? I got the 90d...not happy with a the noise in some pictures. Feel like i should return for the full frame. Not too concerned about 4k video. Really torn between the two.
I've had great dynamic range out of my raw files, and zero issues with the autofocus on the 6D Mark ii. But I know it got mostly negative reviews on UA-cam with those issues stated. I can only speak for myself but after a year and a half using it for photography, I love it.
As for the 90d, it's a video camera in my eyes. That can take decent pictures, but not nearly as good as the 6DMKII for photography. Huge difference in photo quality, and I've taken thousands of photos with both.
@@FitsandFun thanks for your insight. I can see how 6d mark ii would be better for pictures. Though I'm liking the in built flash of the 90d. Is there a flash that wouldn't break the budget that i could use with the 6d mark ii? Does it even need a flash...with the much higher iso capabilities?
I really want the 85mm 1.8 lens too... which works better on the full frame. Such a tough decision. Do you have any experience with this lens...could I make it work for me with the 90d?
What would the video comparison be with low light? I have been a little unhappy with the noise of 90d and been back guessing the decision. I don't understand the usefulness of 4k video that much. 1080p with crisp detail would do all the justice to the scene. Given that both shooting 1080p what would be the better video camera?
The video out of the 90D is better at all resolutions and in any situation in my experience with both cameras. It's odd because the 6dMKii takes fantastic photos, but the video quality does not match the photo quality on the 6dMKii, not even close. Yet on the 90D the photo and video quality are almost indistinguishable.
Oof but then you also have me thinking hard about what I really want this camera for... I want to do YT and videography, but I’m also a photographer and want to get the best camera for work in low light and tight spaces... I have a very difficult decision to make, but this gave me all the information I needed. Thanks again.
Can you help me please ? I have the 90D and I found it really good but I don't think it corresponds to my demand because, I really wanted to focus on landscape, street and portraits photography. Which on do you think will be the best in terms of dynamic range and low-light condition for example, for a good sharp portrait ?
I've had better experience with full frame cameras in low light and for almost all photography needs. With that said, the Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 and the Sigma 35mm f1.4 have been fantastic for me on my 90d in low light and many situations. A few lenses you may want to try for street photography, the lenses are a bit large, but the results are fantastic on my crop sensor cameras like the 90D and T7i. If you want to stay with the 90D, that would be my recommendation.
It is a pleasure to see videos like yours ... perfect sharpness, clarity in colors, clean, it is extraordinary, I really like it ... in your video you can really appreciate the clarity and quality of the images of the photo device you are presenting .. .However, in other videos of other people you can not see anything ... I repeat it is a pleasure to see your videos, bravo, congratulations.....greetings, here is an admirer of the sharpness of your videos
great video. I've been looking at the 90D but i've used my friends 6D Mark II a bit and really liked it so I've been debating between the two. This vid fs helped man!
The video quality was really dumbed down on the 6Dmkii. But don't let that fool you, photographs are stunning on the 6Dmkii, with excellent resolution.
I was going to get 6d ii for video until I saw your comparison. The difference in crispness of video is overwhelming and beats 6d ii by two magnitutes. Now back to studying reviews.... :/
Yeah, the 6dMKii dumbs down the video to 1080p unfortunately. Yet for photos the resolution and image quality is actually better than the 90D's. I was very disappointed with the 6dMKii video quality. Definitely a photo centric camera, which is great for photographers. Just not a great dual threat.
How unfortunate they didn’t make the 6D Mark iii, if I was Canon; I would make the 6D Mark iii specs like this: - Same body - Digic X processor - Dual UHS-II card slots - Same megapixels but with better dynamic range - LP-E6NH battery - Added af joystick - Dual Pixel AF II in live view with human and animal eye af - 100% by 100% screen coverage and 1,053 af points in live view
Good Morning. Your review is great. I have the exact same opinion. I have a 6D MarkII, and I feel the photos are great, but the video quality is totally disappointing. I already thought about switching to Sony cameras, but your review encouraged me to get a Canon 90D. If I had known your review before, I would have purchased a 90D , instead of the 6D MarkII. Portuguese/Brazilian greetings.
Thanks for the video, it came in real handy because I'm at a crossroads... I always liked photography but never invested much, but this year I deiced to invest in it. I've been a Nikon guy all my life and my current camera is an old Nikon D90, but this year I finally out-grown it. So if I want the camera ONLY for hobby photography (small models, a little landscape, street shots) and since I have zero lenses (right now all my glass is Nikon), what would be better, 90D or 6D Mk II? I would REALLY appreciate some feedback on this, because I'm really at a loss to what to choose.
I love the quality of the images I get from the 6D Mark ii. I also think they have more range in light room. Shadows and highlights, also the 6Dmkii seems to have much less noise at higher ISO. So for photography only I'd recommend it vs the 90D. I've taken thousands of photos with both, and I always like the 6D photos more.
@@FitsandFun Thanks man! That's what I wanted to hear. I'm looking all over for opinions on both but everyone focus so much on video... I don't recall ever shooting video with my D90, and I bought in 2000! So good or bad video really capabilities doesn't matter to me, I just want to shoot pics. Thanks a bunch!
Great video, you nailed it. I bought the 90d thanks to all of your videos. I must have watched them all lol. What settings did you shoot the 90d on here? Thx!
I had shutter speed 1/80, iso 100, aperture f1.4. I set the color temp manually to k5200. I also use the picture profile fine detail and tweek it a little, usually take the contrast down a noch. Then I registered the settings to C1 so I can shoot all my videos in this setting with a real consistent look. I own the R6, and still prefer the 90D for this setup. It's just so easy and looks great!
How is auto focus for 90D if doing wildlife? Do you think 6D mark 2 is better? I am not worried about number of frames per second. I want to consider how easy it to keep track of moving subject. Thanks
It may have been harder than you thought for you to make the video - but I 'm happy to say that your conclusion was clearer than I expected and has made my decision much easier: I want to do both, so I'll take the 90D :) Thank you for your help!
Update: I've had my 90D for a few weeks and so far I am perfectly happy with it 😊
I don’t have money for 2 cameras. This is gonna be a hard choice.
Great video, Aaron! I think too many people are obsessed over sensor size..especially when it comes to video creators. On my channel I stress the importance of lighting, shot composition, and last but not least, CONTENT! An interesting shot on an average camera is better than a boring/ordinary shot on a top camera.. for anyone reading this comment, let that statement sink in...
I must say, I have been on the fence about which of these to go with, and your case for video+photo has pushed me to the 90D. Thanks so much for this great video!!
same here i do both photo and video and alredy have an 80D that am so happy with that 4K capability just made my mind up
The 90d has so much more detail. That's crazy!
32MP on APS-C sensor vs 26MP on full frame sensor. Think about it again. Which one will produce more noise?
@@genecatcher1 More information in smaller space, more compression, more side effects. I think 26mp was already good, the camera looks perfect. I came from Nikon and I think she came to fight with the D500, which is one of the best cameras made by Nikon and is cropped.
I never tried it but if it delivers photos with good results over 10 thousand iso because I saw it on the D500.
This was very helpful, especially where you explained that the 90D can accommodate both EF AND EFS lenses... makes me rethink my desire to invest in a full frame camera at the moment... I appreciate it!
Aaron, found your channel over a year ago when I was deciding on getting a DSLR. You helped me choose the t7i and I’ve been real happy with it. It’s great to see your channel growth bro. Keep it up!
I’m leaning heavily towards a 6D for image quality and low light picture capabilities. Thanks again!
Thank you, Aaron. This was a very thoughtful review. My focus is photography and not video. But, I'm leaning towards a 90D at the moment due to the fact that I can still use my current lenses. You really given me lots to think about. Thank you again and well done!
Great video as usual. I appreciate how you don't bog down your reviews with specs. They truly are practical.
You're so right about the video vs photo. I picked up the 6D Mark II back in November (despite it being an older camera) simply because I knew it would meet my photography needs and I don't do any video at all. Plus at the time they both were the same price and I figured I might as well get the full frame while it was on sale.
Well done. I have been researching this topic for a while now in anticipation of buying a camera/video device. After 100s of hours of UA-cam videos and reviews THIS is the exact conclusion I came to as well. Thanks Aaron.
Thank you. Have watched many videos of comparing these two ones and still couldn’t make a choice but your video was simple and much more detailed than others! Live video comparison sample was exactly what I was looking for! 👍👍👍
Own the 6dII, wouldn't change with a 90D as I do photography, seldom videos. Upgraded from a 60D and love the 'fullframe'. But as a carry around I bought a Fuji X100V recently and also love it.
The 90D in photography is better for sports or action though, I guess one hs to know what one wants it for. Both are good choices and no camere fits it all...
I made the right choice then! I don't care about shooting video, I love capturing nature & wildlife photos and i bought 6dmii about a month ago. I think 6d mark ii is great, considering it is the canon's lowest-priced full-frame camera.
Thank you for the way you compared this 2 cameras. It is so far, the best comparable video i have ever seen.
I have a 6Dmk2, which I use in conjunction with a 70D for street photography, they work very well together. I'm looking to upgrade the 70D maybe with the 90d… Would be a classic combination me thinks.
I bought the 80D at a great sale price, two years later picked up the 90D for a similar price and have just bought the6D mkII at AU$250 off. Use and love all three cameras...
I love how you do a side by side comparison not just talking specs👍 thanks for the review good job
I loved how you made the necessary considerations to make the comparison fair.
Good job. Hugs from Brazil!
I'm not a pro, just a hobbyist. For me the major drawback with the 6D II is the 1/4000 shutter speed limitation. If you've ever done high speed sync, then you know this is essential for creativity. And continuous burst limited being limited to 7 FPS.
I have not shot any high speed continuous, but I do a lot of nature and birding, the 7fps work alright for my needs at this point. I still plan on getting the Canon R5 at it's release though, just have to decide which kidney to sell first.
I have to say, this video was very informative, so, thanks. I did want to mention, I'm a pro-photographer and my mentor, partner & best friend, uh, my grandpa, is a Master Photographer with nearly 6 decades behind him. I have a little more than 20 years myself. When we watched the video, you mentioned most "pros" choose a full frame. We know many pros and semi-pros. We all choose the 1.6 crop due to its versatility, compact size and endless features on the fly, and the fact we rarely do video. When we do, we use a drone as it tends to lean toward real estate work.
.
All of this being said, I've been struggling with going with either the 90D or the 6D MKii. The only "full" frames we own are old 120, 220 and 645 medium film cameras - being way bigger than full frame 35mm. Buying the 6D would be my first full frame DSLR. However, after watching this, I'm leaning toward the 90D, mainly because it's newer and I had no idea the 6D accepted only "some" EF lenses. That's a downer for me. I'm looking for a DSLR that is 30+MP, has a huge lens/attachments selection, and must be capable of rich, sharp, colorful imaging within a reasonable price range.
.
One last note. 1.6 crop factor vs. full frame at the same MP won't make your 30x40 inch enlargements noticeably better than the other. Pretty much any Canon camera from 18MP and up is fully capable of being enlarged to 30x40in. and still remain sharp. Throw in some AI editing using Topaz Labs DeNoise, Adjust, Mask or Sharpen, or any combo of these, no one will see the difference when looking at the print from the proper distance for the enlargement.
.
Now, off to look at some more comparison videos using this video as a baseline for the 90D and comp'ing the T7i, T8i and 90D.
.
Mirrorless cameras are a no-go for me. They just look cheap and toy like, which is good for us. Since so many people are flocking to buy the latest "mirrorless" cams, DSLR prices are dropping - FAST! I love it.
.
Hope to see more of your vids in the future.
.
~Alexa Shaw
This Is Saipan
I think you misheard - the 6D Mark ll accepts all EF lenses, while the 90D accepts both EF and EF-S (the lenses specifically made for the crop sensor bodies).
@@ArtDecoArtNouveau Actually, I didn't "hear" it. I read it - on Canon's website.
@@ThisIsSaipanCNMI Apologies and that is strange...the whole point of the EF lenses is that they fit all EOS cameras...do you have a link to this info. because I was also looking at this camera. Thank you!
Sir, your camera and equipment reviews are always stellar. It’s most appreciative how you provide real and honest reviews. This one most definitely huts that same mark. It was a hard comparison but thank you for demystifying this curiosity for us enthusiasts. The 90D is most definitely on the purchase list. 😊
I own a 5D mark III and a Canon 00D and I struggle to compare them. I still consider the 5D3 a Pro camera body despite its age and my 90D a ProSumet ca.era body. But I cant help but find myself using the 90D more due to having more features and higher megapixels. However if I want a certain look to my images the 5D3 is the camera I'm going to shoot with. Thete is just something so pleasing with the full frame sensor.
I completely agree, i wish i could get the same look and feel to an image with the 90D as I can the full frame 6dMKii, but it's just not the same.
I am so glad to find your video review on these two cameras. i spent hours to find answers on all my questions what camera to pick for my needs. I was hesitating because the cost is pretty similar on used 6d mark ii and new 90d and both cameras are great. But you explained stright to the point all prons and cons of usage in terms of photography and videograpthy. It helped a lot. Thanks for making this video.
I had 80D, now I bought 6D mark ii
couldn't be more happy :))
for someone like me that don't care about video, sport, birds, FF is the way to go :)
I wish the 90D is full frame. That is the only downside for me. I make a lot of hauls and standing videos that requires full shot. Do you think with a good lens, I will be able to make it work? I am confused.
To get a similar enough result, all you have to do is compensate for the cropped field of view with a wider (and faster) lens. I shoot with the M6ii (same guts as 90d). If you want a 35mm full frame look, use a 22-24mm lens. If you want a 24mm look use a 16mm lens, for 16mm a 10mm lens, and so on. Once you get used to calculating for the 1.6x crop factor, it becomes second nature. Also keep in mind the aperture on the cropped sensor lens should open at least one stop wider than the full frame equivalent look you're going for to achieve a similar depth of field.
For 90D lenses, I suggest the 24mm pancake and the 10-18mm for those wider shots.
Tokina 11-20 f/2.8 is my favorite lens with this camera
For the past month, i am trying to sell my 90D and get the 6Dii but i am hesitant because I don’t want to lose the video features of the 90D. Now i am keeping my 90D After seeing your vlog. . . And especially now i got myself a 5Div to take care of the photos..
Thanks for the video, new subscriber here from the uae
Thanks very much Aaron, really useful advice. I have an 80d and was thinking of upgrading. All that I read about the 90d, though, was about its video capabilities, but I've only once ever shot video on the 80d. So your comment about going for the 6d for the photography, or the 90d for video work, clinched it for me. The other detail that persuaded me was a diagram I saw of the relative sizes of the aps-c and full-frame sensors.
Camera shopping is really hard to do, especially when your line of work requires you to do both at the same time. I could potentially buy a 90d for video and keep using my 80d for photos, but I need to find a camera with great low-light capabilities.
An excellent comparison. I think that I’m going to buy a 90D for video and a 6D Mark ll for pictures. Now which one do I buy first 🤫
What u doing first
Aaron, just came across this video and found it very informative and straightforward. I like it and have now subscribed! Keep the videos coming!
I love your video, I bought Canon 6D mark 2 and after 3 weeks I have decided to sell it on a second hand market, I am just hugely disappointed with video quality, and this decision was made even before I saw your video. Thank you for honest review.
The 1080p on the 90D is incredibly sharp. It might just be because of youtube compression, but it looked noticeably sharper than the 4k. What picture profile were you using?
THANK YOU SO MUCH! After so many reviews and comparisons you hit all points I was missing to decide between these two cameras. Definitely subscribing to your channel.
Nice job! Very helping as I wade through the sea of options I am researching.
Wasn’t expecting the 90d to outshine the 6D. Now, I’ll never decide on a camera😅
If you can't decide, get the 90D. He fails to mention that the 90D also beats the 6D in a very important category, which is dynamic range and it does so by quite a margin. Also, you can get the sigma 18-35mm f1.8 lens for the 90D and there is nothing comparable for the 6D, especially for the price.
@@filip1491 if you plan on doing more video then yes, but if you plan on doing more photography then the 6d m2 is far superior. Dynamic range is important but if agajn its mainly for photography you are going to be editing your RAW photos anyway in which you can recover shadows that may be lost, or over exposed areas.
@@fondfarewell2 Will the Sigma 18-35mm 1.8 work on a full frame camera?
@@RichieColemanSr as long as it is an ef mount, ef yes ef-s no.
@fondfarewell2 ! I heard it won't work.
You're reviews are awesome! Thank you for such in-depth information.
Best comparison I've seen yet. Super helpful, thank you!
Just subscribed, great explanation on these two different camera's. I only want full frame but now I am doing Video training and the tracking feature on the 90D is hard to ignore. great video
My 17-35mm 2.8L gets real wide on the full frame. My 75-300 IS gets extra reach on my crop sensor giving me 480mm equivalent. As for video...not there yet.
Thanks for the review. It was super useful as i am considering switching to full frame and did not know that i have to take into account all the extra glass. Helped me a lot ! Keep up the good work!
I have 90D and looking to get my first full frame sensor and 6D Mk II is the one I am interested to get one.
This was an amazing video. It really clears upon which camera I should get now and which camera I can hold off on getting, so thank you.
Full frame looks so much natural and the background just looks amazing...
Thanks for this. Next week I am going on a shoot with someone who has the 6D. I have the 90D, so I am looking forward to seeing the results
I own both cameras. I like them both but find myself using the 90D more often. For portraits and low light photography, I use the 6D mark II. For everything else, I use the 90D.
How is the High ISO/low light performance on the 90d? I have the original 6D already and I know its awesome on that camera. Was wondering about that 90d's performance. Thanks
@@danc3746 I love using the 90D but it's low light performance isn't as good as I would like. For lower light situations where I don't want to use a flash, I use my 6D Mark II.
I love your video Aaron, your so down to earth and real. Great information, keep up the great work.
Moving from a t3i that I've been using for 10 years at least it seems,,, I'm struggling to choose a new camera. The 90 interests me slightly more because of lens options, however, I never shoot video and have zero desire to. Perhaps the 6d would be a more realistic choice. Enjoyed your video
Thank you for this video! Super helpful and well made! I've been ready to upgrade and have both cameras in hand and need to make the decision to return one :x I think I'm going with the 6D since I'm mostly serious about photography
You CAN get great stills out of the 90d, but you need really good glass, patience, and time for post work, as Topaz DeNoise is an absolute MUST.
Nobody said you couldn't
PSA - you can convert the mount on the EF-S 10-18mm to EF. Just check eBay. You can then use it on the 6Dii at 14-18mm! Crazy wide view on FF and the vignette isn't that bad. Just don't use it below 14mm or bad things will happen
I know, I have a video showing how I did it. I used a hacksaw. Probably not the smartest thing I've ever done. But it worked.
@@FitsandFun Ha! Yeah, I don't know that I'd have been that brave, lol. Nice comparison video sir! I keep shooting so much film, I'm looking at picking up an EF body again so I can share lenses.
Absolute Brilliant video Aaron, I was confused which one to buy from these two options, As my preference is more to the video I will prefer 90D with Sigma 18-35mm lens.
Your video is very beneficial in terms of choice.
Thanks for making this video, you are absolutely gem :)
Hard choice but i would still choose Canon 90D, Digic 8 and 4K and headphone jack are great. But 6D MKII is full frame
That was my struggle for making this video, I can't go back to a crop for my photography, and yet I can't go back to only 1080p for video. Waiting for a full frame with 90D features and an extra memory card slot.
@@FitsandFun Yeah both cameras has down and up, it all depends on your needs. I would choose 90D instead but you will like EOS R5. It will probably cost $4000 though
That's on my Christmas list.
@@FitsandFun That's the one i want but it's going to be expensive i heard, i wanted the EOS R but i will wait to see how much the EOS R5 cost. That camera will be a beast but nobody need 8K now, 4K no crap going to be great for videos.
90d is best
You nailed it. I used to be confused as well.
I currently have Canon 60d + Sigma 35mm 1.4 + Canon 50mm 1.8 and do a lot of car photography. To me, it feels a little bit outdated, so I'm looking to upgrade, plus I don't like that it's APSC. Been looking at mirrorless options like Canon RP or R, but I'm not sure, because they're quite expensive and have plenty of cons. Anyone can recommend a decent Canon camera? 90d? Like the one in the video? There's too much choice.
I have the 70D and the 6D Mk II... From my experience, the 70D APSC camera pic IQ can be excellent - if the light is bright enough. This is why I purchased the 6D MkII. It has the Full Frame look, and is just better suited for certain pics. Yes focus tracking on the 90D looks great.. // For photographers: If you are only taking pictures during bright days, the 70D should work out fine for you. 90D (just got one) is newer with more megapixels, thus better in low light. Video is a different comparison.
Aaron, do you have a comparison of 90d and 6d mark ii in low light, fast moving and zooming? I have a canon sl3. I have used it for volunteer work taking pictures and videos for high schoolers performance portfolio (dance, theatre, orchestra and band). They use black box or theatre for their performances. The room is usually dark. I have to max my ISO to 25600 that caused the pictures to be grainy. Any thoughts on which camera is better for taking pictures in my situation? Thank you.
Full frame does better in low light, in my opinion. But the 90d has better tracking in auto focus mode.
Hey do you have the Canon 6d mark ii >> Sigma 35mm 1.4 art lens calibration settings? Using the Sigma USB Dock
I didn't need to calibrate my second copy of the lens, I traded my first copy back in and tried the Canon 16-35mm f4. Wasn't impressed with that so I went back to another Sigma 35mm f1.4 and the second copy worked great out of the box. Or it was already calibrated before I got it. Sorry.
Hi sir I would like to see you do a comparison between both of them performance in low light .
Excellent comparison, thank you! i will go with the 90D, since I'm more interested in video.
thanks to your statement, greetings from germany
Great video mr.Aron , Now I know which camera is right for me, your videos always useful.
.6D mark ii will be the second camera for me after the T7i, you helped me with both cameras thanks 👍👍
Finally!! I've been searching for this comparison forever now. Thanks for this video.
I'm exactly in this dilemma. I am really impressed by the shutter speed, the continuous shooting and the improved focussing system on the 90D but i really would like a full frame as well!
I don't think I'll be able to make a decision and be a 100% happy with it but I'm gonna have to do it eitherways.
Shravan Swaminathan Buy a used 6d for 500 bucks and give it a try. Great quality, very affordable. Forget about shutter speed, except you really need it. Take your time, take a slow shooting approach, you will learn more.
After owning my 60D for some years and now the 6Dii, I dont think it is a big deal to have FF just for the sake of having it. Also the field of view vs lens purchases becomes mlre challenging. The middle of the lens range is the same price wise but on the ultra wide and telephoto end is where it changes. You can get amazing quality ultra wide on a crop body (8 and 10mm) for about $600 while with FF the most extreme ultra wide (12 and 11mm) cost 3x as much. The same on the telephoto end but even more expensive because of the crop factor making short telephoto long. The low light is better but most cameras these days do a good job. The largest benefit I think is portrait photography to add that extra backround blur and low light. If that is not specifically a major part of what you shoot, then pick the one that has the features you want most.
You probably will end up with 2 good cameras. A aps-c for long range outdoors photography and a full frame for portrait and artistic photography.
At least that keeps the cost down in the big telephoto lenses. The 90d is great for sports and birds, and long range photography.
The 6d Ii is going to do better for artistic, portrait, and low light.
What ever camera you have now, just get some good glass for, keeping in mind that EF lenses can also be used in your full frame most of the time.
I bought a 6d cheap, but every lens I have bought for it cost 2-3 times more than the camera.
Wish I had just bit the bullet and bought an R6 mk Ii. Because now to move up I will have to use an adapter.
Same with my aps-c. Should have just bought the R7.
You're not just buying a camera, you are buying into a system. And changing systems is way more expensive than just a camera.
You can take wonderful pictures with a cheap body and good glass.
Know exactly what you want to do with your photography. Get the glass you need. Then get the camera for the job.
You probably have an asp-c camera now. So when buying glass, if you think you're going for a full frame, make sure your new lenses are capable of being used on a full frame.
Unless pro photography is on the horizon, or you're wealthy, I bet you stick to asp-c. And if you're going pro, then just figure on getting into the R series cameras and lenses now. You'll want and need the dual card slots, usb2 SD cards, and those $1,000 + lenses. At least the RF 50mm f/1.8 isn't too bad of a price.
Thanks for your honest opinion, currently ton between these cams, but I think after watching this, I am leaning more towards mark ii considering the type of photography I'm trying to get into. Thanks again!
If photography is your main focus then I'd absolutely recommend the 6D Mark ii.
This helped me decide I need to upgrade my 5d m2 and sl2 to these 2 cameras, thank you!
The 90D is more detail and sharp. But if you come from the era of shooting since 2005 or 2010, there was always the desire to own a FF. Now video means more in Dslr than pictures do but at one time it was reverse.
Thank you for making this video. This is a tough one to decide on because I do professional video but would still like that full frame aesthetic for photography😭
That's it, I'm getting the 90D. I'm sure I'll be happy upgrading from my T3i. Subscribed.
Omg same, I just bought my 90D
@@samanthacortespoblano6515 Mine arrived this week! So excited.
@@samanthacortespoblano6515 I have the mirrorless version of it, the M6ii, and i adore it. You guys are gonna love your 90D!
Since you have had crop sensor experience I soul suggest go for the 6d mark ii. I also was using T7i. But then I bought an used 6d original. Huge difference in image quality. The overall look and iso performance is way better in 6d orginal.
I'm planning to purchase a new camera preferably a FF but my 10-22 efs will not be compatible. I'm not looking for a video camera and would be mostly shooting portrait and nature. Which camera do you suggest keeping in mind the lens compatibility.
Came here to say I thought you did a great job on this video, you are too hard on yourself. I bought the EOS90D today just based on this but I know exactly what trade off I am making now. Awesome job! Subbed.
Planning your get a camera for film school. Do you think in 1.5 years there will be a 6d mark iii? Im debating between these two but i hope the 5d mark v comes out soon. Even after watching your video i still cant decide. For film school should i get 90d or 6d mark ii. Im udgrading from a 7d+60d setup with mainly ef(not efs) lenses. Size and portability is not a concern, neither is price
great review well explained I have a 90D and it's awesome
Hows the quality for streaming on the 90d ?
I actually used it yesterday with Canon's webcam utility software, and the picture quality was like I was recording a video in 1080p. I guess the only limitations would be your internet connection and streaming software. The web utility allowed my software to recognize my 90D as a webcam, the software wasn't a stand alone streaming software.
@@FitsandFun so quality was the same as the video i just saw? If so, that’s pretty clean and sharp.
I thought the quality was very similar, if not the same. Definitely a huge upgrade over webcams. Also I love the fact that I could use my 35mm Sigma f1.4 to blur out the background.
@@FitsandFun
Thanks for the replies, appreciated 👍🏼
I want for pictires. Which one? Does matter 32 pix and 26 for 5d?
What lens did you use for the 90d while shooting this indoor video? Love your videos by the way.
The Sigma 35mm f1.4.
I am looking for a camera for photography so this video was really helpful for me. thank you.
What lens dis you use for this video, it's important to mention this
It's the Sigma 35 mm F 1.4. At the beginning of the video I posted in the bottom left corner with the camera use also
@@FitsandFun Quick question. Do you think the lens attributed to the sharpness in the video for 90D?
I have 50mm and 18-55mm kit lens and wondering if there is a difference. I had a Lumix G9 and Sigma 18-35mm. The sharpness wasn't that noticeable. Sure for 4K, but not with the lens.
Yes, Sigma lenses seem to be noticeably sharper. But the Canon 50mm f1.8 is pretty sharp as well from f2.8 and up. At f1.8 it's a bit soft.
I was in this same situation. I bought a nikon d810. Video sucks yes, but cant even compare the still image quality.
Very good video. I’d like to know can I use 90d for semi-pro photography. I mean shooting the products or something like that. Is the resolution enough?
And what is the risk for buying the used camera? Should I go for new one? Or save the money for lens.
I've never owned a FF camera. I'm a serious photographer. The diff is that I know that the cameras are different not better than the other. Once you realize that fact all the FF marketing goes out the window. I'm getting the 90d for the extra detail over my 80d and MP4 4K lite. Which is fine for moi. Basic color correction and a LUT I'm done. I don't have to blow another $1- 1.5K for a new computer.
I like owning both. The R6 is pretty amazing also.
@@FitsandFun Yes the R6 is super nice. I got a ridiculous deal on a used 6D for low light concert photos. Trading in the 80D for a 90D in a few weeks.
I've heard the 6D photo quality is fantastic, never used one personally.
@@FitsandFun Check out Camera Hoarders comparison.
Hello Arron, I am still unsure of what camera to buy. I seldom use video, mainly on vacation, I shoot wildlife, street scenes and landscapes. I like the fact the Mark ii is full frame, and I don’t lose anything, Which should I choose, Thanks mate !!!
What about the dynamic range issues and autofocus problems every one talks about on the 6d mark ii? I got the 90d...not happy with a the noise in some pictures. Feel like i should return for the full frame. Not too concerned about 4k video. Really torn between the two.
I've had great dynamic range out of my raw files, and zero issues with the autofocus on the 6D Mark ii. But I know it got mostly negative reviews on UA-cam with those issues stated. I can only speak for myself but after a year and a half using it for photography, I love it.
As for the 90d, it's a video camera in my eyes. That can take decent pictures, but not nearly as good as the 6DMKII for photography. Huge difference in photo quality, and I've taken thousands of photos with both.
@@FitsandFun thanks for your insight. I can see how 6d mark ii would be better for pictures. Though I'm liking the in built flash of the 90d. Is there a flash that wouldn't break the budget that i could use with the 6d mark ii? Does it even need a flash...with the much higher iso capabilities?
I really want the 85mm 1.8 lens too... which works better on the full frame. Such a tough decision. Do you have any experience with this lens...could I make it work for me with the 90d?
Aarons Practical Reviews thank u
What would the video comparison be with low light? I have been a little unhappy with the noise of 90d and been back guessing the decision.
I don't understand the usefulness of 4k video that much. 1080p with crisp detail would do all the justice to the scene.
Given that both shooting 1080p what would be the better video camera?
The video out of the 90D is better at all resolutions and in any situation in my experience with both cameras. It's odd because the 6dMKii takes fantastic photos, but the video quality does not match the photo quality on the 6dMKii, not even close. Yet on the 90D the photo and video quality are almost indistinguishable.
@@FitsandFun wow makes me really happy about the decision! Thank you so much Aaron!
[writing from a different account]
Which one would you recommend if I want it to take street photography, landscapes and portraits? Thanks.
Oof but then you also have me thinking hard about what I really want this camera for... I want to do YT and videography, but I’m also a photographer and want to get the best camera for work in low light and tight spaces... I have a very difficult decision to make, but this gave me all the information I needed. Thanks again.
Can you help me please ? I have the 90D and I found it really good but I don't think it corresponds to my demand because, I really wanted to focus on landscape, street and portraits photography. Which on do you think will be the best in terms of dynamic range and low-light condition for example, for a good sharp portrait ?
I've had better experience with full frame cameras in low light and for almost all photography needs. With that said, the Sigma 18-35mm f1.8 and the Sigma 35mm f1.4 have been fantastic for me on my 90d in low light and many situations. A few lenses you may want to try for street photography, the lenses are a bit large, but the results are fantastic on my crop sensor cameras like the 90D and T7i. If you want to stay with the 90D, that would be my recommendation.
Wow. 4:53 really illustrates how much better the 90D is at video.
It is a pleasure to see videos like yours ... perfect sharpness, clarity in colors, clean, it is extraordinary, I really like it ... in your video you can really appreciate the clarity and quality of the images of the photo device you are presenting .. .However, in other videos of other people you can not see anything ... I repeat it is a pleasure to see your videos, bravo, congratulations.....greetings, here is an admirer of the sharpness of your videos
great video. I've been looking at the 90D but i've used my friends 6D Mark II a bit and really liked it so I've been debating between the two. This vid fs helped man!
That's amazing, even though 6d mark ii has a full frame, 90d has more details in 1080p
The video quality was really dumbed down on the 6Dmkii. But don't let that fool you, photographs are stunning on the 6Dmkii, with excellent resolution.
@@FitsandFun Can you upload raw photos take in 90D and 6D Mark ii?
I was going to get 6d ii for video until I saw your comparison. The difference in crispness of video is overwhelming and beats 6d ii by two magnitutes. Now back to studying reviews.... :/
Yeah, the 6dMKii dumbs down the video to 1080p unfortunately. Yet for photos the resolution and image quality is actually better than the 90D's. I was very disappointed with the 6dMKii video quality. Definitely a photo centric camera, which is great for photographers. Just not a great dual threat.
@@FitsandFun thanks! and where in your opinion is M50 ii within the three in terms both of video and stills?
I've never used that camera so I don't want to give you the wrong information.
thank you for information about two cameras are very useful
How unfortunate they didn’t make the 6D Mark iii, if I was Canon; I would make the 6D Mark iii specs like this:
- Same body
- Digic X processor
- Dual UHS-II card slots
- Same megapixels but with better dynamic range
- LP-E6NH battery
- Added af joystick
- Dual Pixel AF II in live view with human and animal eye af
- 100% by 100% screen coverage and 1,053 af points in live view
Good Morning. Your review is great. I have the exact same opinion. I have a 6D MarkII, and I feel the photos are great, but the video quality is totally disappointing. I already thought about switching to Sony cameras, but your review encouraged me to get a Canon 90D. If I had known your review before, I would have purchased a 90D , instead of the 6D MarkII. Portuguese/Brazilian greetings.
I have made the same mistake by purchasing Canon 6D mark 2 three weeks ago.
If video is your priority, go for the Sony.
@@Greggiexplore It is not a mistake, get some good lenses and you will enjoy the camera.
I have a Tamron 18-400 I wonder if it might fit on the 90D canon ? Can anyone help ?
Great Video, good in depth reviews of both options. I also got a bit of help from the Canon UK experts with their Canon Live service
Thanks for the video, it came in real handy because I'm at a crossroads... I always liked photography but never invested much, but this year I deiced to invest in it. I've been a Nikon guy all my life and my current camera is an old Nikon D90, but this year I finally out-grown it. So if I want the camera ONLY for hobby photography (small models, a little landscape, street shots) and since I have zero lenses (right now all my glass is Nikon), what would be better, 90D or 6D Mk II? I would REALLY appreciate some feedback on this, because I'm really at a loss to what to choose.
I love the quality of the images I get from the 6D Mark ii. I also think they have more range in light room. Shadows and highlights, also the 6Dmkii seems to have much less noise at higher ISO. So for photography only I'd recommend it vs the 90D. I've taken thousands of photos with both, and I always like the 6D photos more.
@@FitsandFun Thanks man! That's what I wanted to hear. I'm looking all over for opinions on both but everyone focus so much on video... I don't recall ever shooting video with my D90, and I bought in 2000! So good or bad video really capabilities doesn't matter to me, I just want to shoot pics. Thanks a bunch!
Thank you, Mr. Aaron. Your video is really helpful. Thanks a ton!
Great video, you nailed it. I bought the 90d thanks to all of your videos. I must have watched them all lol. What settings did you shoot the 90d on here? Thx!
I had shutter speed 1/80, iso 100, aperture f1.4. I set the color temp manually to k5200. I also use the picture profile fine detail and tweek it a little, usually take the contrast down a noch. Then I registered the settings to C1 so I can shoot all my videos in this setting with a real consistent look. I own the R6, and still prefer the 90D for this setup. It's just so easy and looks great!
@@FitsandFun thank you very much, you and your videos have really helped me a lot. I love the 90d!
How is auto focus for 90D if doing wildlife? Do you think 6D mark 2 is better? I am not worried about number of frames per second. I want to consider how easy it to keep track of moving subject.
Thanks
Excellent review! Well done man! Thanks and cheers from WA State!
Do you recommend a good wide screen lens for the 90d that has built in image stabilization?
Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 G2
Ultra Wide? Tamron 10-24 VC HLD
Thanks For the vid. Going for the 6D as my first full frame camera for photos only.
Subscribed!!
This video was so helpful! Thank you so much.
Thank you so much for doing this comparison!