Torture was commonplace during the time the story of "The Hunchback of Notre Dame" took place and Frollo was entitled to do so as it was part of his job; ruling of punishments were crude in the real world's far past as well.
@@redrasegarden I thought about replying this kind of thing, but he's definitely stretching his authority to where he could possibly be charged (witches could get out of execution if they recanted, but he's implying doing so would ally her with him, which it normally wouldn't)
The mass murder of an unarmed civilian population is honestly the only one that I can think of as an inexcusable war crime. The other normal crimes are pretty standard in war, and usually get appealed if your side is the victor in said war, or is said actions were what helped cause your side's victory. Assassination the enemy emperor would certainly help the Huns win the war, as well as killing anyone who directly interferes with that objective. Also, property damage and illegal border crossing is unavoidable in war.
exactly what I was thinking, some would be war crimes but others would probably not be crimes at all in a war. he's not an illegal immigrant, he's attacking the enemy country, he's not trying to kill Mulan normally, he's fighting an enemy soldier
@Obama doESn’t care I am saying that around the 3rd-4th Century most of Central and Northern Asia wasn't controlled by anyone - the nomadic peoples thrived in it and there were some territories claimed by them, but nothing specific to be drawn on a map.
He killed Quasi’s mom and tried to drown him. He also enabled torture, and, yes, he a RACIST!!! He hated the gypsies! He also harassed gypsy women, set buildings on fire, and killed gypsies! He’s attempted FIRST degree murder! This scumbag was too dangerous to be kept alive, and even after throwing him into the fire, no time to celebrate yet! Even when he’s dead, he’s still committing crimes!
HAHAHAHA... As also Claude Frolllo should have another 5 charges for attempted child murder, tresspasing, peace disturbtion, inciting a riot and child abduction
Not 100% sure; but wouldn't Ursula interfering, resulting in her getting what she wanted out of the contract then altering it be considered crimes? Not to mention Ariel was a minor (16) and didn't have a parent or legal guardian with her when she signed the contract, that should probably make it invalid or illegal.
It could be considered corruption of a minor, not to mention that the contract would be automatically nullified, though it seems that in Atlantica, you are technically an adult at 15, which is ridiculous imo, due to the fact that in the original story, the average mermaid’s life span was 300 years, but I guess they would then also have different legislation than humans
Okay, a couple things about my clients. First off, Ursula's "false imprisonment" charges can be dropped as her garden is made of those who couldn't pay for her services. To my knowledge, this fits under the category of "Deal with the Devil" wishing, so them being turned into those things was probably part of the magic contract she made all participants sign before giving them what she promised. Secondly, to my knowledge Ursula wasn't pretending to be a different person. Vanessa, her alter ego, was an identity of her own design, meaning Ursula was neither impersonating or stealing another's identity. (Mind you, this depends on the jurisdiction of the court, but since she is in the middle of the sea, I would judge we have to take such charges in the most literal sense.) Thirdly, Shan Yu is a political figure and therefore has diplomatic immunity. Additionally, since his "crimes" predates the Geneva Convention, he cannot be charged with war crimes. All of his actions were acts of war, and therefore he cannot be arrested under the pretense of criminal activity. Hades also falls under this category, as he is the ruler of the Underworld and thus his acts are to be punished in the houses of political debate, not a court room meant for criminals. That being said, we can charge Hades with impersonation as the actual Greek Hades did not act anywhere close to his movie counterpart. Finally, while not legal now, during his term as judge, Judge Frollo was legally allowed to torture, and could still authorize it up until the year 1789. Thus, I wish for the jury to please ignore such charges against my clients, as these are, in one form of another, excusable by the circumstances they were in.
"Your honor, the contract with accused Ursula is void ab initio as it was signed by my underaged client without the consent of her parent or designated guardian. There being no valid contract, she is thus under no obligation or authority to proceed with the possession of my client's voice which is her own personal property. I thus recommend that charges of qualified theft and swindling be added to the charge sheet of the accused. I so moved, your honor."
You cannot force imprisonment on someone even if they signed a contract. It's considered an illgal agreement "An illegal agreement is any contract that is forbidden by law. This includes any agreement that is against the law, is criminal, or that is against public policy. Illegal agreements are invalid from their creation, meaning that agreements associated with the original contract are also considered void." Although this can depend on your local jurisdiction. If someone can't pay for your services, in no legal way is imprisonment a valid replacement for payment. Unless sea law works differently ofcourse
@@woordenhechtster Sea law must work differently, since the contract's legality even kept Triton from destroying it with his magic trident. Although, I would argue that Ursula was still using a form of impersonation with Ariel's voice. It's also implied that she was using some kind of magical mind manipulation on Eric.
Objection your honor! "Ursula had a minor sign a contract without consent from a parent/legal guardian. Also her attempt at using Ariel's voice to have the prince kiss her instead would be interference and breaching her end of the contract." "Furthermore, while Shan Yu's actions would at the time be considered an act of War. He still attempted to murder/dethrone the monarchy and trespassed on Government property."
This series is a really fun and great study on what is morally wrong and what is unlawful. It’s so interesting to see what is actually illegal as opposed to just vile and evil.
0:06 I love how lady Tremain spent her fortune building a giant medieval tower in her back yard to lock up Cinderella. That's just so over-the-top wasteful and petty evil and it doesn't get enough appreciation.
For Claude Frollo add on four more: 1) "attempted infanticide" for trying to kill baby Quasimodo on top of killing his mother 2) False imprisonment for keeping Quasimodo locked up in the tower under the guise of being his caretaker. That loops back to the "attempted infanticide" because let's face it he's only doing it because the church guilted him into it. He was evil enough to even consider drowning the infant then so he could've just done so despite the deacon pleading for him not to. He didn't want to keep the child. 3) on top of malfeasance in office add "coercion and intimidation" for his threats to burn Esmeralda if she didn't accept his offer. 4) "Violation of the call for sanctuary" (don't know the official term) by Esmeralda. The church granted it so on top of the sexual harassment he shouldn't be there anyway so that's at LEAST trespassing but because Esmeralda called for sanctuary and the church granted it that's worse for Frollo
@@Kris-fq9bi I'd imagine probably 20 or so. Frollo looks like he's gone gray and the priest looked like he had full white hair. So I'd guess Frollo is in his 60s-70s and the priest in his 80s
@@Kris-fq9bi I mean....the crimes these fictional characters committed are pretty serious lol. But it is an interesting topic. Like what would say....Pete the Prospector be charged with? He was really only in Toy Story 2 so....
Some crimes that I think could've been added: Lady Tremaine: False imprisonment (Locking up Cinderella) Clayton: Attempted murder (Trying to kill Tarzan which ended up with him hanging) Shan Yu: Conspiracy to attempted murder when he says "How many men does it take to deliver a message?" Ursula: Not sure if this counts but manipulating/tampering with Ariel's contract to go her way (under conspiracy of her eel henchmen) Frollo: Attempted infanticide (Nearly killed Quasimodo as an infant before the Archdeacon stopped him)
Techinally with Ursula, there’s nothing illegal with trying to push the contract in her way, unless the contract says she can’t. She upholds her contractional agreements, Ariel gets legs, gives her voice and has three days to get with Eric. She never says or makes it clear she can’t interact, nor does she change the contract.
He also didn't list all the crimes Frollo did. Coercion and intimidation: he intimidates Quasimodo to have control over him. Racial discrimination: heavily implied he promoted racial laws against the gypsies. Prisoner abuse: it's implied he tortures prisoners at the Palace of Justice. Child neglect: he refused to save his foster son Quasimodo from being massacred by the crowd. Attempted rape: he hunted down Esmeralda with the intent to rape her. Mass murder: he killed a lot of people by torching half of Paris. Gaslighting: he made Quasimodo believe that it was his fault Paris was burning down. False arrests: he ordered the arrest of Esmeralda, Phoebus and the whole Romani population, which were all innocents and placed a innocent family of paupers under house arrest. Wrongful execution: he gave death penalty to Esmeralda for a crime she didn't committ and tried execute Phoebus for not following his orders.
@@fuckalldisneyremakesorigin5560 Good points. Here's some more crimes for Frollo: Terrorism: Torching half of Paris is this regardless if he killed anyone. Hate Crimes: Many of his crimes count as this. Harassment by Proxy: Everytime his men harassed someone under his orders and him letting the crowd and his men torment Quasimodo.
@@dylantennant6594 the contract between Ursula and Ariel is only legal and enforceable if: the subject matter of the contract is not illegal or against public policy, both parties are legally of age and have mental capacity to enter into a contract (I'm not sure if Ariel is legally an adult under Under the Sea law). The contract could also be void if the terms of the agreement are impossible to fulfill or too vague to understand, fraud (in the form of false representation of facts) has been committed. I'm obviously not read up on the laws Under the Sea, but I'd be surprised if the contract is even legal in the first place, and even if it is, I'd be surprised if it isn't void or voidable.
A lot of them couldn’t be tried for the crimes they have done, since they were (for the most part) legal at their time. Frollo would maybe only be tried for the damages he did to the church, but even then it’s not very likely. Hades is a god, with only a few mortals having seen him while alive , the case would probably never have went through. Ursula would be difficult too, since she lives under the sea. Lady Tremaine would also be difficult to charge, since she wasn’t really considered an adult and was under the tutelage of the father of Cinderella. Shan Yu would also be difficult to try since the crimes he committed wasn’t illegal (and the Geneva convention wasn’t a thing) and a lot of them were also common in that time. Clayton would probably charged with some of is crimes, only poaching would be somewhat legal at the time (around 1890).
Also for the Ursula case, it is most likely that Ariel would be killed by the humans (not Eric but others) if she ever revealed that she was a mermaid. Humans, especially sailors were extremely terrified of mermaids. They were said to make ship sinks to eat humans, enthralling them with songs. Most humans would consider Eric to be the victim of Ariel, probably trying her instead of Ursula and burning her at the stake/executing her.
About Frollo, isn't there any legal thing about going into a saint building or place of cult? I mean, even if you're from that religion... He wasn't allowed the entry
That is a plot point in the movie actually. Esmerelda claiming sanctuary puts her under the protection of the church. Frollo violating that protection is infringing on religious freedom as well as tantamount to declaring war on the church itself. Additionally, this is before the separation of church and state so declaring war on the church is also treason.
He is also rousing others to violence for his personal agenda and hiding behind his religion as a shield. Whilsed intimidating killing and pursecuting others for there background. I might be wrong but that sounds as terrorism/extrimisem to me.
My friend and I actually discussed this because we wondered what crimes the villains would be guilty of, when we got to Frollo, the list just kept going on and on. He didn't just commit arson once, but he set most of Paris on fire, so that gets amplified by every citizen who wishes to press charges. but then there's Jafar, Captain Hook, Maleficent, the Evil Queen, and so many more.
After watching Part 1: "It'd be pretty interesting to see if there's a Disney Villain who technically didn't do anything LEGALLY wrong." After watching Part 2: Well I guess it wouldn't make the stakes as high if they wouldn't break SOME kind of law.
Some villains didin´t break any laws in the context of their time and place. We are judging their crimes using American law, but of course in others places and eras the laws where different. Many of the crimes committed by Frollo for example were done as he was exercising his authority.
@@eduardof7322 Good point! It would definitely make for a great video, comparing the modern version of the justice systems of the countries/regions featured in these Disney films to the justice systems of those countries/regions when the stories took place, to see what was legal then and now isn't.
I don't think Dumbo's circus owners broke any laws. Even with Dumbo's mother, they only did what they needed to do with what they legitimately thought was an elephant gone mad. Well, maybe you could charge them for a crime for negligently exposing animals to alcohol?
@@Compucles from what I looked up, that isn't specifically a law according to USDA animal welfare laws, but it should be. Technically alcohol is poisonous and could likely kill many animals in small doses
Not really a villain, more of an antagonist, but Encanto comes to mind. And I agree. It would be a nice writing challenge to make sure the villain/antagonist never breaks any laws.
"Malfeasance in office" Wow! What terminology! Also, I think he passed that when he went on a literal witchhunt for Esmerelda. He was the judge; he had no right taking the law into his own hands. He should have left the job to the Captain.
Claton also attacked Tarzan with his machete, so 'Assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill' (or however you would say it in a legal setting) could be added to the charges.
@@Your_mom513 it’d be both, because in the beginning when he almost shot him with his shotgun and at the end when he was attacking him and Tarzan wasn’t fighting back
Im pretty sure you missed the part where Shan Yu is torturing two Chinese soldiers by killing one of them as they were let go... "How many people does it take to send a message?" "Only one..."
@@donpula6349 he let them both go under the impression that theyd both send the message. He then used one as target practice. That has to be SOME kind of torture
Look at the lineup Lady T: "I don't have to take this, I'm walking out." Clayton: "Have we met? I'm thinking I've found my ultimate prize." Hades: "Just so you all know, you're all joining me.. Real soon." Frollo: "Are you the Devil? Holy shit, YOU'RE the Devil!!!" Shan Yu: "Keep scrolling... I got nothing to say." Cruella: "Darling Shan gave me a Tiger pelt to go with my Dragon scale gloves, they were to die for." Ursula: " MY DEATH WAS SOOO F**KING METAL!!!!"
In a Russian musical version, Cinderella’s father doesn’t die. At the end (after the ball and I believe after the prince and Cinderella marry), the father enters the court and requests the king let him divorce the evil stepmother. The king looks at the evil stepmother and grants it. I don’t remember the Disney version well and I haven’t read the original, so I don’t know if it is stated the father died. (But, to your point, it seems Lady Tremaine was a gold digger, though she is a more complex character in Once Upon A Time.)
@@lunakingsley.7247 frollo burned Paris to the ground and led a 20 year genocide without remorse actually with pride even. And he wants nothing more than to keep a young girl against her will, not as a wife or even lover, but as just a sex toy for him to inflict his sick desires on. And to top it all off unlike most Disney villains he’s just a man, no dark magic powers, just a man on a personal crusade to take what he thinks is his, no matter how many people he has to kill in his way. He’s the epitome of evil. And therefore In my opinion the best Disney villain of all time.
I'm not sure about that since Possiden wanted Triton & Ursula to rule over THE SEA 2gethar, but She was exiled for various reasons that aren't even aacurate
You forgot that with Ursula disguising herself as ‘Vanessa’ and attempting to marry Prince Eric, she’d also be guilty of attempted rape by deception. Also, she had him hypnotized in the process, which was essentially giving him a magical roofie.
And how about all those plot twist Disney villains that started in 1999 with Tarzan and Toy Story 2? As of the early 21st Century, you could just swear Disney wanted to be Scooby-Doo!
Them adding Hades and treating him like a super powerful deadbeat dad even though he's one of *the big three Greek Gods out there* ticked me off soo much
The third movie annoys me most. Like, they seriously opened Isle of the Lost allowing DR. FACILLIAR, a man who wanted to SELL EVERY SOUL IN NEW ORLEANS to roam free. Hades is another character they try to use as a big example of this and like… all that attempted murder… Really most Disney villains probably don’t deserve the borderline redemption they got in the third movie.
Fun fact: Clayton the villain is Tarzan's cousin (in the books at least) Tarzan's real name is John Clayton II. This guy's name is William Cecil Clayton.
Can we get one of these for the “heroes” too? Aladdin has possibly almost as many charges as Jafar (albeit less severe), especially if you count his backstory, Mulan could probably be charged with military fraud for enlisting under a false identity, the Beast wrongfully imprisoned Belle using her father as a hostage, and Prince Florian committed outright sexual assault at the end of Snow White. And there’s probably even more that I either haven’t seen or just can’t think of off the top of my head.
There are circumstances wherein it is excusable to have what would otherwise be considered various flavors of assault, such performing mouth-to-mouth resuscitation in an attempt to save a life. It could be argued that Prince Florian's action is protected by such a "Good Samaritan" clause.
1- Lady Tremaine also might be counted for Psychological Abuse on the whole "Dress Ripping" scene and Unlawful Imprisonment for sealing Cinderella in her room 2- Ursula can be processed for Torture and Extreme Bodily Harm to all those little worms , Attempted Rape if we consider her trying to marry Eric under false identity (And what happens after the Wedding) and attempted Regicide and Coup d'Etat , since Triton counts as a Monarch . 3- Frollo might not have broken that many Laws since he counts as an Officer of the Law and his Legislative/Judicial situation is quite different .Also his Illegitimate Arrests in persecution of an Innocent Individual , Violation of a Cathedral and omission of all due process in the Judicial system should be counted .
The attempted rape one is valid since Eric was under some sort of spell/ entrancement. So he was under the influence in a way and therefore unable to give consent. However, Ursula only wanted to marry Eric to get into Ariel's way, I doubt they actually would have consumed the marriage but who knows.
@@katherineboyanova5972 >I doubt they actually would have consumed the marriage but who knows. Although , as an Ursula simp , I would be envious of that situation .
It goes without saying that Frollo's list of crimes in the longest, but I'm sure there are more to be added, like: attempted statutory rape (because Esmeralda is technically under 18, and I'm assuming that we're using the modern-day legal system to judge him), breaking and entering, air pollution (cause of all the bonfires), trespassing, mass genocide, verbal abuse, blackmail or the like (because he offers Esmeralda's freedom in exchange for her belonging to him), destruction of both private and public property, and of course all the mistrials and miscarriages of justice in his position as a judge.
@@spencervance8484 I know that historically-speaking 16 wouldn't have been a deterrent. That's why I specified in my comment that I'm assuming we're using the modern-day definitions of different laws to judge these villains. Because if we were using the old laws from their time, then they wouldn't be charged with as much. xP
Something else to point out for Ursula/Vanessa, she put Eric under a mind control spell and forced him to marry her without any conscious decision in the matter. That's no different than giving him a roofie, and she could face rape charges for that.
I love how when the PSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE come up it has Frollo sporting a (O.O) like he's now just realizing what he just told Quasi and goes "Wait a minuet...."
Ursula also attempted second degree murder on Eric, and we known the intent was fatal, as the blast vaporized Flotsam and Jetsam when Ariel redirected the shot.
And all of them (except for Tremaine, and de vil) got what they deserved in the end Clayton: hanged by self made noose Ursula: stabbed and electrocuted Shun Yu: blown up by fireworks Hades: (presumably) eternal torment in the river Styx Claude Frollo: BURNED IN HOLY FIRE!
This was a very humorous clip, thank you for adding some fun to my day. Also to anyone who might want to critique the crimes, this is not reality TV folks, let's just take it as it is, good old humor.
For Clayton, you forgot the attempted murder charge on Tarzan. For Ursula, ursurping the throne. For Frollo, you forgot an attempted child murder with babby Quasi, or was that lumped in with the child abuse?
Here's what their sentences would be (I think): Stepmother: 2 Years in Prison Cruella: Moderate Fines + Community Service Clayton: Death Penalty Ursula: Life Sentence Shan Yu: Execution as a War Criminal Hades: Death Penalty Frollo: Execution as a War Criminal
Don't forget how Frollo was about to drop baby Kasimodo in a well, and how Clayton tried to chop Tarzan in pieces, or how Ursula stole the throne (I think, I dressed as her for Halloween but I haven't seen the movie for quite some time)
I love how Frollo has committed more crimes then Hades, who is basically the Geek devil. Edit: When I say Hades is the Greek devil, I’m talking about the Disney version. In actual Greek Mythology, he was one of the few decent gods.
Zeus was easily the worst of the Greek gods. Idk why everyone always assumes that hades was a bad guy just because he was the god of the underworld. He didn't even choose to do that.
Sentencing: Lady Tremaine: 20 years in prison, chance of parole after 10 Cruella de Vil: 10 years in prison, chance of parole after 5 Clayton: Death by hanging (Mr. Pierrepointe is awaiting) Ursula: Death by beheading Shan Yu: Seppuku or death by beheading Hades: Death by throwing over precipice Claude Frollo: Death by hanging
I've just realised that Frollo and Shan yu are the biggest criminals of them all. Although, we could add Ursula's creepy mermaid garden not only as false imprisonment but also as mutilation
@@spencervance8484 I'm pretty sure being at war with a country doesn't change the fact that entering a government building without appropriate clearances is trespassing.
Sentences: Lady Tremain: 25 years + $265,000 fine Cruella de Vil: 15 years and 3 months + $500 fine Clayton: 15 years and 4 months + $10,750 fine Ursula: 21 years and 4 months + $1750 fine Shan Yu: 35 years + 1 death penalty + $101,000,000,000 fine + 1 life sentence Hades: 3 life sentences + 90 years + 1 death penalty Claude Frollo: 73 years and 4 months + 4 life sentences + 1 death penalty
I still can't believe Disney was able to create a villain as dark and realistic as Frollo in the late 90s, of all times. Not something you'd see today, or expect to see before that even. BatB, Lion King, and Aladdin were nowhere near as serious.
Trmaine-(30 years in jail) De vil-(40 years in jail with the sequel) Clayton-(life in prison) Ursula-(death) Shan Yu-(Life in prison Hades-(going to hell by Gods judgement) Claude-(death)
You forgot an additional charge for Tremaine; since she lied to an official and destroyed the only glass slipper they had, she was technically interfering with an official investigation. EDIT: Technically, Cruella would also be facing attempted murder of the second degree, as she would have killed the truck driver as well as the puppies by trying to drive them off the road. Clayton would also be facing multiple charges for attempted murder, as we see him attempt to shoot Tarzan multiple times throughout the movie. Shan Yu would also be facing charges for kidnapping an official, as well as murder and theft (since the Huns stole the Chinese dragon for the parade). Not to mention the soldier he ordered shot. Pretty sure there's also a law against flag burning. Hades' charge for child abduction would technically be child abduction by proxy, as it was Pain and Panic who kidnapped Hercules under his orders. And he would be facing another charge for attempted murder, as he knew the waters of the Well of Souls would be lethal to Hercules, yet had him go in. Though come to think of it, all the monsters he sent after Hercules would be charges of attempted murder and conspiracy. And there's also abuse in the workplace, as he fries Pain and Panic every chance he gets. Frollo would also be facing charges for attempted child murder. Though I'm not sure about the charges of authorizing torture and ethnic cleansing; as whipping was a legal form of punishment back then, and Frollo's fixation seems to be more on the criminal aspect, such as "thieves and cutpurses, the dregs of humankind all mixed together in a shallow drunken stupor." Many of the gypsies were shown to be criminals; between illegally entering Paris, evading authorities, swindling, false claims of handicap, thievery and attempted murder. Race is never once mentioned to be a motivating factor in Frollo's M.O, so I'd scrub those charges at least.
New Disney Crimes video is out, but with a little twist: ua-cam.com/video/pQ5tRToQ-uM/v-deo.html
The huns were from the Himalayas
Torture was commonplace during the time the story of "The Hunchback of Notre Dame" took place and Frollo was entitled to do so as it was part of his job; ruling of punishments were crude in the real world's far past as well.
I love how there are all these crimes about murder and harassment for Frollo and then there’s just vandalism.
Looked more like a B&E to me.
@@PhatBoyFresh If you mean breaking and entering, I agree
Just as bad
Thing about frolo is he was probably given legal permission to do everything he was charged with here.
@@redrasegarden I thought about replying this kind of thing, but he's definitely stretching his authority to where he could possibly be charged (witches could get out of execution if they recanted, but he's implying doing so would ally her with him, which it normally wouldn't)
I'm pretty sure some of Shan Yu's crimes could be counted as war crimes.
The mass murder of an unarmed civilian population is honestly the only one that I can think of as an inexcusable war crime. The other normal crimes are pretty standard in war, and usually get appealed if your side is the victor in said war, or is said actions were what helped cause your side's victory. Assassination the enemy emperor would certainly help the Huns win the war, as well as killing anyone who directly interferes with that objective. Also, property damage and illegal border crossing is unavoidable in war.
@@the_oc_maniac8972 I think "massacre" is the right word.
exactly what I was thinking, some would be war crimes but others would probably not be crimes at all in a war. he's not an illegal immigrant, he's attacking the enemy country, he's not trying to kill Mulan normally, he's fighting an enemy soldier
And tried by the international Court
Exactly what I'm saying
I love how Shan Yu's place of origin is "Not-China".
Most likely Mongolia or some place like that
Oh, you beat me to it. 😃
@@Mistfall254 The Huns were a nomadic people, at that time they didn't have an actual country.
@Obama doESn’t care I am saying that around the 3rd-4th Century most of Central and Northern Asia wasn't controlled by anyone - the nomadic peoples thrived in it and there were some territories claimed by them, but nothing specific to be drawn on a map.
@Obama doESn’t care The dark side of the moon
Loving the fact that Frollo broke more laws that the literal god of the Underworld
@Anna Marfa and hades is the law (of the underworld)
That’s because he lets other people commit his crimes
More than dpuble
He killed Quasi’s mom and tried to drown him. He also enabled torture, and, yes, he a RACIST!!! He hated the gypsies! He also harassed gypsy women, set buildings on fire, and killed gypsies! He’s attempted FIRST degree murder! This scumbag was too dangerous to be kept alive, and even after throwing him into the fire, no time to celebrate yet! Even when he’s dead, he’s still committing crimes!
Massive hypocrite
I think you forgot that Clayton should also have a charge for attempted murder against Tarzan
HAHAHAHA...
As also Claude Frolllo should have another 5 charges for attempted child murder, tresspasing, peace disturbtion, inciting a riot and child abduction
I would have to agree with you on that one
true
How about destruction of rainforests?
And first degree murder on Kerchak
Not 100% sure; but wouldn't Ursula interfering, resulting in her getting what she wanted out of the contract then altering it be considered crimes?
Not to mention Ariel was a minor (16) and didn't have a parent or legal guardian with her when she signed the contract, that should probably make it invalid or illegal.
16 is adulting in mermaid year
@@tanncheevasit2398 and in a lot of places more sensible than usa
@@mikaelamonsterland UTA under the sea
Also intent to overthrow a government and intention to control the oceans (blatant climate change?) lol
It could be considered corruption of a minor, not to mention that the contract would be automatically nullified, though it seems that in Atlantica, you are technically an adult at 15, which is ridiculous imo, due to the fact that in the original story, the average mermaid’s life span was 300 years, but I guess they would then also have different legislation than humans
Okay, a couple things about my clients.
First off, Ursula's "false imprisonment" charges can be dropped as her garden is made of those who couldn't pay for her services. To my knowledge, this fits under the category of "Deal with the Devil" wishing, so them being turned into those things was probably part of the magic contract she made all participants sign before giving them what she promised.
Secondly, to my knowledge Ursula wasn't pretending to be a different person. Vanessa, her alter ego, was an identity of her own design, meaning Ursula was neither impersonating or stealing another's identity. (Mind you, this depends on the jurisdiction of the court, but since she is in the middle of the sea, I would judge we have to take such charges in the most literal sense.)
Thirdly, Shan Yu is a political figure and therefore has diplomatic immunity. Additionally, since his "crimes" predates the Geneva Convention, he cannot be charged with war crimes. All of his actions were acts of war, and therefore he cannot be arrested under the pretense of criminal activity.
Hades also falls under this category, as he is the ruler of the Underworld and thus his acts are to be punished in the houses of political debate, not a court room meant for criminals. That being said, we can charge Hades with impersonation as the actual Greek Hades did not act anywhere close to his movie counterpart.
Finally, while not legal now, during his term as judge, Judge Frollo was legally allowed to torture, and could still authorize it up until the year 1789.
Thus, I wish for the jury to please ignore such charges against my clients, as these are, in one form of another, excusable by the circumstances they were in.
"Your honor, the contract with accused Ursula is void ab initio as it was signed by my underaged client without the consent of her parent or designated guardian.
There being no valid contract, she is thus under no obligation or authority to proceed with the possession of my client's voice which is her own personal property.
I thus recommend that charges of qualified theft and swindling be added to the charge sheet of the accused. I so moved, your honor."
lol like any mortal could even arrest Hades and drag him to a court room
You cannot force imprisonment on someone even if they signed a contract. It's considered an illgal agreement "An illegal agreement is any contract that is forbidden by law. This includes any agreement that is against the law, is criminal, or that is against public policy. Illegal agreements are invalid from their creation, meaning that agreements associated with the original contract are also considered void." Although this can depend on your local jurisdiction. If someone can't pay for your services, in no legal way is imprisonment a valid replacement for payment. Unless sea law works differently ofcourse
@@woordenhechtster Sea law must work differently, since the contract's legality even kept Triton from destroying it with his magic trident.
Although, I would argue that Ursula was still using a form of impersonation with Ariel's voice. It's also implied that she was using some kind of magical mind manipulation on Eric.
Objection your honor!
"Ursula had a minor sign a contract without consent from a parent/legal guardian. Also her attempt at using Ariel's voice to have the prince kiss her instead would be interference and breaching her end of the contract."
"Furthermore, while Shan Yu's actions would at the time be considered an act of War. He still attempted to murder/dethrone the monarchy and trespassed on Government property."
7:19 Claude Frollo's face when you stated his crime LOL
damn, I didn't notice this at all when editing it XD
It’s hilarious
"oh sh-t am I making my villainy too obvious"
'But...you know I am a righteous man!'
@@meridaskywalker7816 The Inquisition finds you guilty of heresy and immorality.
This series is a really fun and great study on what is morally wrong and what is unlawful. It’s so interesting to see what is actually illegal as opposed to just vile and evil.
0:06 I love how lady Tremain spent her fortune building a giant medieval tower in her back yard to lock up Cinderella. That's just so over-the-top wasteful and petty evil and it doesn't get enough appreciation.
Nah, towers like that were often a part of old mansions due to medieval times fascination.
That feels almost on par with Eobard shoving 6 year old Barry down the stairs
she didn't add the medival tower it was already part of the estate when she married into it
It's just part of the transition between the Medieval and the Middle Ages.
For Claude Frollo add on four more:
1) "attempted infanticide" for trying to kill baby Quasimodo on top of killing his mother
2) False imprisonment for keeping Quasimodo locked up in the tower under the guise of being his caretaker. That loops back to the "attempted infanticide" because let's face it he's only doing it because the church guilted him into it. He was evil enough to even consider drowning the infant then so he could've just done so despite the deacon pleading for him not to. He didn't want to keep the child.
3) on top of malfeasance in office add "coercion and intimidation" for his threats to burn Esmeralda if she didn't accept his offer.
4) "Violation of the call for sanctuary" (don't know the official term) by Esmeralda. The church granted it so on top of the sexual harassment he shouldn't be there anyway so that's at LEAST trespassing but because Esmeralda called for sanctuary and the church granted it that's worse for Frollo
Elder abuse too.....throwing that priest down the stairs.....but that probably depends on how much younger frollo is than the priest
@@Kris-fq9bi I'd imagine probably 20 or so. Frollo looks like he's gone gray and the priest looked like he had full white hair. So I'd guess Frollo is in his 60s-70s and the priest in his 80s
@@Kris-fq9bi He's already charged for assault and battery, so elder abuse is under that crime.
@@PianoHypnoshroom lol, I love that we are all talking about this so seriously. No sarcasm, I really love it 🤣
@@Kris-fq9bi I mean....the crimes these fictional characters committed are pretty serious lol.
But it is an interesting topic. Like what would say....Pete the Prospector be charged with? He was really only in Toy Story 2 so....
Some crimes that I think could've been added:
Lady Tremaine: False imprisonment (Locking up Cinderella)
Clayton: Attempted murder (Trying to kill Tarzan which ended up with him hanging)
Shan Yu: Conspiracy to attempted murder when he says "How many men does it take to deliver a message?"
Ursula: Not sure if this counts but manipulating/tampering with Ariel's contract to go her way (under conspiracy of her eel henchmen)
Frollo: Attempted infanticide (Nearly killed Quasimodo as an infant before the Archdeacon stopped him)
Techinally with Ursula, there’s nothing illegal with trying to push the contract in her way, unless the contract says she can’t. She upholds her contractional agreements, Ariel gets legs, gives her voice and has three days to get with Eric. She never says or makes it clear she can’t interact, nor does she change the contract.
He also didn't list all the crimes Frollo did.
Coercion and intimidation: he intimidates Quasimodo to have control over him.
Racial discrimination: heavily implied he promoted racial laws against the gypsies.
Prisoner abuse: it's implied he tortures prisoners at the Palace of Justice.
Child neglect: he refused to save his foster son Quasimodo from being massacred by the crowd.
Attempted rape: he hunted down Esmeralda with the intent to rape her.
Mass murder: he killed a lot of people by torching half of Paris.
Gaslighting: he made Quasimodo believe that it was his fault Paris was burning down.
False arrests: he ordered the arrest of Esmeralda, Phoebus and the whole Romani population, which were all innocents and placed a innocent family of paupers under house arrest.
Wrongful execution: he gave death penalty to Esmeralda for a crime she didn't committ and tried execute Phoebus for not following his orders.
@@fuckalldisneyremakesorigin5560 Good points.
Here's some more crimes for Frollo:
Terrorism: Torching half of Paris is this regardless if he killed anyone.
Hate Crimes: Many of his crimes count as this.
Harassment by Proxy: Everytime his men harassed someone under his orders and him letting the crowd and his men torment Quasimodo.
@@dylantennant6594 the contract between Ursula and Ariel is only legal and enforceable if: the subject matter of the contract is not illegal or against public policy, both parties are legally of age and have mental capacity to enter into a contract (I'm not sure if Ariel is legally an adult under Under the Sea law). The contract could also be void if the terms of the agreement are impossible to fulfill or too vague to understand, fraud (in the form of false representation of facts) has been committed. I'm obviously not read up on the laws Under the Sea, but I'd be surprised if the contract is even legal in the first place, and even if it is, I'd be surprised if it isn't void or voidable.
Cruella, the video included the dognapping but not the breaking and entering/burglary that must have happened to get the dogs in the first place
it'd be nice to see how many years they all would be in prison for after adding all their charges together.
I’m sure pretty much all of them would receive life sentences or even death penalties.
@legaleagal could answer that.
Shan Yu probably death penalties because of the war crimes
A lot of them couldn’t be tried for the crimes they have done, since they were (for the most part) legal at their time. Frollo would maybe only be tried for the damages he did to the church, but even then it’s not very likely. Hades is a god, with only a few mortals having seen him while alive , the case would probably never have went through. Ursula would be difficult too, since she lives under the sea. Lady Tremaine would also be difficult to charge, since she wasn’t really considered an adult and was under the tutelage of the father of Cinderella. Shan Yu would also be difficult to try since the crimes he committed wasn’t illegal (and the Geneva convention wasn’t a thing) and a lot of them were also common in that time. Clayton would probably charged with some of is crimes, only poaching would be somewhat legal at the time (around 1890).
Also for the Ursula case, it is most likely that Ariel would be killed by the humans (not Eric but others) if she ever revealed that she was a mermaid. Humans, especially sailors were extremely terrified of mermaids. They were said to make ship sinks to eat humans, enthralling them with songs. Most humans would consider Eric to be the victim of Ariel, probably trying her instead of Ursula and burning her at the stake/executing her.
About Frollo, isn't there any legal thing about going into a saint building or place of cult? I mean, even if you're from that religion... He wasn't allowed the entry
Yeah, that would be trespass of some kind
yeah Violation of Sanctity I believe
That is a plot point in the movie actually. Esmerelda claiming sanctuary puts her under the protection of the church. Frollo violating that protection is infringing on religious freedom as well as tantamount to declaring war on the church itself. Additionally, this is before the separation of church and state so declaring war on the church is also treason.
He is also rousing others to violence for his personal agenda and hiding behind his religion as a shield. Whilsed intimidating killing and pursecuting others for there background. I might be wrong but that sounds as terrorism/extrimisem to me.
@@firebirdchild975 When governments or individuals in power do those things it’s called oppression I agree fully
I love how in tarzan, when the poachers are hunting the gorillas, the writers honestly believe that a pissed off mama gorilla won't fuck them up
Can’t have a literal blood bath in the family film.
@@AlonzoTompkins no but'll be educational to the children.
Don't fuck with animals that can bench press you
@Alonzo Tompkins
And yet the villain accidentally strangled himself
Was it even poaching then? For you to be poaching an animal it has to be illegal and those sorts of laws were nearly non existent.
Or a major silverback. 😵🤔
My friend and I actually discussed this because we wondered what crimes the villains would be guilty of, when we got to Frollo, the list just kept going on and on. He didn't just commit arson once, but he set most of Paris on fire, so that gets amplified by every citizen who wishes to press charges.
but then there's Jafar, Captain Hook, Maleficent, the Evil Queen, and so many more.
I don't think I've watched Hunchback before, I was SO taken aback by just how much stuff he did
I definitely haven’t seen it. For some reason I thought it was about whales.
I’m gonna guess it’s one of Disney’s darkest movies
@@SweetCandyDragon I think about it every time someone says “that was too dark for a kids show” this and Pinocchio
After watching Part 1: "It'd be pretty interesting to see if there's a Disney Villain who technically didn't do anything LEGALLY wrong."
After watching Part 2: Well I guess it wouldn't make the stakes as high if they wouldn't break SOME kind of law.
Some villains didin´t break any laws in the context of their time and place. We are judging their crimes using American law, but of course in others places and eras the laws where different. Many of the crimes committed by Frollo for example were done as he was exercising his authority.
@@eduardof7322 Good point! It would definitely make for a great video, comparing the modern version of the justice systems of the countries/regions featured in these Disney films to the justice systems of those countries/regions when the stories took place, to see what was legal then and now isn't.
I don't think Dumbo's circus owners broke any laws. Even with Dumbo's mother, they only did what they needed to do with what they legitimately thought was an elephant gone mad.
Well, maybe you could charge them for a crime for negligently exposing animals to alcohol?
@@Compucles from what I looked up, that isn't specifically a law according to USDA animal welfare laws, but it should be. Technically alcohol is poisonous and could likely kill many animals in small doses
Not really a villain, more of an antagonist, but Encanto comes to mind.
And I agree. It would be a nice writing challenge to make sure the villain/antagonist never breaks any laws.
"Malfeasance in office" Wow! What terminology! Also, I think he passed that when he went on a literal witchhunt for Esmerelda. He was the judge; he had no right taking the law into his own hands. He should have left the job to the Captain.
Heck, he crossed the line way back when he attacked and killed Quasimodo's mother.
Claton also attacked Tarzan with his machete, so 'Assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill' (or however you would say it in a legal setting) could be added to the charges.
This would be attempted murder. If you are going to kill someone with 100% intent and fail, then it’s attempted murder.
@@Your_mom513 I'd be both. Or fall under assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill.
@@Your_mom513 it’d be both, because in the beginning when he almost shot him with his shotgun and at the end when he was attacking him and Tarzan wasn’t fighting back
@@gyrosbounty5566 oh yeah, almost forgot that he almost killed him twice
Did Tarzan commit Manslaughter when he caused Clayton to kill himself? I'm not sure if that's the right term.
Lucky me, I watched part 1 of this series and it turns out just hours ago another part has been made haha
Im pretty sure you missed the part where Shan Yu is torturing two Chinese soldiers by killing one of them as they were let go...
"How many people does it take to send a message?"
"Only one..."
And also, he had wounded Mulan with his sword during the avalanche
@@donpula6349 he let them both go under the impression that theyd both send the message. He then used one as target practice. That has to be SOME kind of torture
@@donpula6349 im pretty sure we call thT a war CRIME
He juste asked a question, any order.
You need two in case of target practice accident and one drops death.😐😎😁
Look at the lineup
Lady T: "I don't have to take this, I'm walking out."
Clayton: "Have we met? I'm thinking I've found my ultimate prize."
Hades: "Just so you all know, you're all joining me.. Real soon."
Frollo: "Are you the Devil? Holy shit, YOU'RE the Devil!!!"
Shan Yu: "Keep scrolling... I got nothing to say."
Cruella: "Darling Shan gave me a Tiger pelt to go with my Dragon scale gloves, they were to die for."
Ursula: " MY DEATH WAS SOOO F**KING METAL!!!!"
That Frollo comment was what I was going for, yes XD
@@fluteless Hilarious XD
LOL!
I see Clayton likes them older ladies.
Ursula be like: GOSH! ITS BRUTAL OUT HERE
I'm actually curious what the charges would be like for their time/period/location, too.
Don’t forget the death penalty
It's never said in the movie, but I'm sure Lady Tremaine killed or aided in the death of her husband/Cinderellas father
She tampered her stepdaughter's Happy ending by wand-jacking Fairy Godmother
It's implied.
Although, that's clearly not true in the live action remake.
In a Russian musical version, Cinderella’s father doesn’t die. At the end (after the ball and I believe after the prince and Cinderella marry), the father enters the court and requests the king let him divorce the evil stepmother. The king looks at the evil stepmother and grants it.
I don’t remember the Disney version well and I haven’t read the original, so I don’t know if it is stated the father died. (But, to your point, it seems Lady Tremaine was a gold digger, though she is a more complex character in Once Upon A Time.)
I have long suspected that. She showed very little grief over his death, and she certainly had a motive: inheriting his wealth and property.
PLEASE DO NOT MAKE US WAIT 3 MORE YEARS FOR PART THREE
6:48 Frollo
Frollo has committed more crimes than any other Disney villain
Jafar committed a lot more.
@@lunakingsley.7247 they both have the same ammount actually
@@lautarosilveira6584 huh. It looked like Jafar had a lot more. Oh well.
That's why he's the scariest. He's racist, genocidal and fanatical
@@lunakingsley.7247 frollo burned Paris to the ground and led a 20 year genocide without remorse actually with pride even. And he wants nothing more than to keep a young girl against her will, not as a wife or even lover, but as just a sex toy for him to inflict his sick desires on. And to top it all off unlike most Disney villains he’s just a man, no dark magic powers, just a man on a personal crusade to take what he thinks is his, no matter how many people he has to kill in his way. He’s the epitome of evil. And therefore In my opinion the best Disney villain of all time.
I love how Frollo almost has as much as Jafar proving them to had done more than Maleficent which in this case is crimes
RIP Ursula voice actress. We miss you, but will always remember the legacy you left behind. Thanks for all the great work you do.
:’(
Her name is Pat Carroll, in case anyone is wondering.
I was waiting for the reckless driving charge from 101 Dalmatians that scene literally traumatized me as a kid her eyes still haunt my dreams
I expected Frollo to have the most crimes once I started the video
The voice of Ursula passed away this year.
:(
WHY IS THIS YEAR TAKING SO MANY BELOVED PEOPLE GOD JUST STOP
You mean Pat Carroll?
R.I.P Ursula's voice actress.
@@ok-bs1dx Pat Carroll the most iconic actress who voiced as a Disney villain
For Ursula, you forgot Treason for attempting to depose King Triton
I'm not sure about that since Possiden wanted Triton & Ursula to rule over THE SEA 2gethar, but She was exiled for various reasons that aren't even aacurate
I love how shocked Frollo seemed to be about his crimes, he really was self righteous.
Lol I didn't notice that until I saw this 😂
I'm surprised Ursula didn't get a high treason charge.
She was supposed to rule the sea with Trition since they were siblings but was banished for changing reasons. Mash all of them up
For Frollo you should’ve added property damage, he incinerated a whole house.
Technically every Disney villain has probably committed harassment in some way shape or form as harassment can be watered down to "intimidation"
9:28 Look at that.... Frollo has the longest list of crimes
One of them has a Death Penalty
You forgot that with Ursula disguising herself as ‘Vanessa’ and attempting to marry Prince Eric, she’d also be guilty of attempted rape by deception. Also, she had him hypnotized in the process, which was essentially giving him a magical roofie.
OMG, you have made me one of the happiest people on earth to see this! :D
After watching Descendants I just can’t take most Disney villains seriously anymore
And how about all those plot twist Disney villains that started in 1999 with Tarzan and Toy Story 2? As of the early 21st Century, you could just swear Disney wanted to be Scooby-Doo!
Those movies are just a weird non canon fan fiction to me.
Them adding Hades and treating him like a super powerful deadbeat dad even though he's one of *the big three Greek Gods out there* ticked me off soo much
but Descendants is basically a fan fiction... Not official canon of the animated classics
The third movie annoys me most. Like, they seriously opened Isle of the Lost allowing DR. FACILLIAR, a man who wanted to SELL EVERY SOUL IN NEW ORLEANS to roam free. Hades is another character they try to use as a big example of this and like… all that attempted murder… Really most Disney villains probably don’t deserve the borderline redemption they got in the third movie.
Fun fact: Clayton the villain is Tarzan's cousin (in the books at least)
Tarzan's real name is John Clayton II. This guy's name is William Cecil Clayton.
Indeed had Clayton been revealed as relative of the hero. He would've been charged for family cruelty
Honestly, I like this series, and hope a new part comes out soon
do not forget that Frollo tried to kill a baby Quasimodo but was stopped
That's also a hate crime because he tried to kill him for his deformity
Can we get one of these for the “heroes” too? Aladdin has possibly almost as many charges as Jafar (albeit less severe), especially if you count his backstory, Mulan could probably be charged with military fraud for enlisting under a false identity, the Beast wrongfully imprisoned Belle using her father as a hostage, and Prince Florian committed outright sexual assault at the end of Snow White. And there’s probably even more that I either haven’t seen or just can’t think of off the top of my head.
There are circumstances wherein it is excusable to have what would otherwise be considered various flavors of assault, such performing mouth-to-mouth resuscitation in an attempt to save a life. It could be argued that Prince Florian's action is protected by such a "Good Samaritan" clause.
Jees, that last guy was running the gauntlet of charges.
You forgot about Ursula blackmailing Triton and briefly usurping his crown.
1- Lady Tremaine also might be counted for Psychological Abuse on the whole "Dress Ripping" scene and Unlawful Imprisonment for sealing Cinderella in her room
2- Ursula can be processed for Torture and Extreme Bodily Harm to all those little worms , Attempted Rape if we consider her trying to marry Eric under false identity (And what happens after the Wedding) and attempted Regicide and Coup d'Etat , since Triton counts as a Monarch .
3- Frollo might not have broken that many Laws since he counts as an Officer of the Law and his Legislative/Judicial situation is quite different .Also his Illegitimate Arrests in persecution of an Innocent Individual , Violation of a Cathedral and omission of all due process in the Judicial system should be counted .
The attempted rape one is valid since Eric was under some sort of spell/ entrancement. So he was under the influence in a way and therefore unable to give consent. However, Ursula only wanted to marry Eric to get into Ariel's way, I doubt they actually would have consumed the marriage but who knows.
@@katherineboyanova5972
>I doubt they actually would have consumed the marriage but who knows.
Although , as an Ursula simp , I would be envious of that situation .
I would love to see a video where all the villains you’ve ranked are then ranked in order of the shortest
possible sentence to the longest one!
I second this!
It goes without saying that Frollo's list of crimes in the longest, but I'm sure there are more to be added, like: attempted statutory rape (because Esmeralda is technically under 18, and I'm assuming that we're using the modern-day legal system to judge him), breaking and entering, air pollution (cause of all the bonfires), trespassing, mass genocide, verbal abuse, blackmail or the like (because he offers Esmeralda's freedom in exchange for her belonging to him), destruction of both private and public property, and of course all the mistrials and miscarriages of justice in his position as a judge.
Let's also add starting a war and being creepy to the list.
Starting a war. Yes thats a crime. Being creepy isnt. Also at least in britain marrying age was 16 as of 1763. It was younger earlier than that.
@@spencervance8484 The creepy part was a joke lol.
@@spencervance8484 I know that historically-speaking 16 wouldn't have been a deterrent. That's why I specified in my comment that I'm assuming we're using the modern-day definitions of different laws to judge these villains. Because if we were using the old laws from their time, then they wouldn't be charged with as much. xP
Emeralds is 16 in the book but mid 20s in the film, so it would just be sexual harassment and sone attempted coersion.
Frollo looks so shocked by his list, lmao
Something else to point out for Ursula/Vanessa, she put Eric under a mind control spell and forced him to marry her without any conscious decision in the matter. That's no different than giving him a roofie, and she could face rape charges for that.
I love how the maker of this video added the music of Law and Order in it.😊
1:41
Cruella seems quite proud of her crimes
I love how when the PSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE come up it has Frollo sporting a (O.O) like he's now just realizing what he just told Quasi and goes "Wait a minuet...."
I love how Frollo is put on the end screen so that he looks like he’s looking horrified at hades
Ursula also attempted second degree murder on Eric, and we known the intent was fatal, as the blast vaporized Flotsam and Jetsam when Ariel redirected the shot.
That's also manslaughter since she did murder her henchmen by mistake.
Shouldn't Clayton also be charged with attempted murder?
I'd love to see a few more of these. Maybe some more of the newer villains, like King Candy and Bellwether for example
And all of them (except for Tremaine, and de vil) got what they deserved in the end
Clayton: hanged by self made noose
Ursula: stabbed and electrocuted
Shun Yu: blown up by fireworks
Hades: (presumably) eternal torment in the river Styx
Claude Frollo: BURNED IN HOLY FIRE!
Everybody gangsta till Frollo appears-
This was a very humorous clip, thank you for adding some fun to my day.
Also to anyone who might want to critique the crimes, this is not reality TV folks, let's just take it as it is, good old humor.
The only thing I wish u did was include how much jail time each crime caused and how much it would have added up. Otherwise great work!
Ursula's origin being "under the sea" is probably my favourite part
I love that Frollo was charged with 11 offences LOL!!!!!!! Great video.
I mean if we are adding charges, The first charge for Ursula should be the practice of witchcraft😂
That would be a charge for the time.
I love how for Frollo there's the usual stuff and then straight up fucking encouraging torture
For Clayton, you forgot the attempted murder charge on Tarzan.
For Ursula, ursurping the throne.
For Frollo, you forgot an attempted child murder with babby Quasi, or was that lumped in with the child abuse?
Probably lumped in with CA
Here's what their sentences would be (I think):
Stepmother: 2 Years in Prison
Cruella: Moderate Fines + Community Service
Clayton: Death Penalty
Ursula: Life Sentence
Shan Yu: Execution as a War Criminal
Hades: Death Penalty
Frollo: Execution as a War Criminal
Not surprised Frollo has the most charges 😂😂
Don't forget how Frollo was about to drop baby Kasimodo in a well, and how Clayton tried to chop Tarzan in pieces, or how Ursula stole the throne (I think, I dressed as her for Halloween but I haven't seen the movie for quite some time)
So I guess frollo is the jafar for this part
Not only was Ursula stalking but she was stalking a minor.
Let's add imposionment too for Lady tremaine since she locked up Cinderella.
For Part 3, can you do Ratigan, Medusa, McLeech, Prince John, Sykes, Yzma, Governor Ratcliffe and Gantu
I love how Frollo has committed more crimes then Hades, who is basically the Geek devil.
Edit: When I say Hades is the Greek devil, I’m talking about the Disney version. In actual Greek Mythology, he was one of the few decent gods.
Nope hades was a pretty chill and fair god.
@@carlosmedina1281 Disney version tho...
Zeus was easily the worst of the Greek gods. Idk why everyone always assumes that hades was a bad guy just because he was the god of the underworld. He didn't even choose to do that.
@@sketchyzo3110 I’m talking about in the movie. Not actual Geek Mythology.
Hades wasn't a Devil in Greek Mythology
Sentencing:
Lady Tremaine: 20 years in prison, chance of parole after 10
Cruella de Vil: 10 years in prison, chance of parole after 5
Clayton: Death by hanging (Mr. Pierrepointe is awaiting)
Ursula: Death by beheading
Shan Yu: Seppuku or death by beheading
Hades: Death by throwing over precipice
Claude Frollo: Death by hanging
Who knew Disney villains were (mostly) so tall?
Nice touch charging Cruella deVil with Reckless Driving.
I've just realised that Frollo and Shan yu are the biggest criminals of them all. Although, we could add Ursula's creepy mermaid garden not only as false imprisonment but also as mutilation
3:40-NOTE: Shan Yu Is Likely From Modern-Day Mongolia. Which Is Where The Likely Origin Of The Huns Originated From
Wait shouldn’t Clayton be charged for “Attempted Murder” because he tried to kill Tarzan!?
I love these so much keep on making more of these 🙏😍
Shouldn't Shan Yu also be charged with trespassing? I mean not only the border one, pretty sure he wasn't allowed in that building specifically
Shan Yu committed so many crimes that weren't listed here.
Shan yu was at war with china.
@@spencervance8484 I'm pretty sure being at war with a country doesn't change the fact that entering a government building without appropriate clearances is trespassing.
The Law and Order theme in the background is a nice touch.
I just watched the first one that was posted 2 years ago, I didn't know that this one was posted just today
Sentences:
Lady Tremain: 25 years + $265,000 fine
Cruella de Vil: 15 years and 3 months + $500 fine
Clayton: 15 years and 4 months + $10,750 fine
Ursula: 21 years and 4 months + $1750 fine
Shan Yu: 35 years + 1 death penalty + $101,000,000,000 fine + 1 life sentence
Hades: 3 life sentences + 90 years + 1 death penalty
Claude Frollo: 73 years and 4 months + 4 life sentences + 1 death penalty
The Coachman for pinochio deserves death penalty because hes the only villian who got away with human traficking.
I thought he was trafficking donkeys
(I am just joking I know he somehow made the boys turn into donkeys)
I don’t know why, but I laugh every time you put “Chuld abuse” up there lol
*So basically Claude Frollo was a BEAST & had no business in a kids movie* 🤣
Correct. And even by the standards of his day...the church or government would want him dead for his crimes
Villains: *Shoud we care?*
Fluteless: *Yes I CARE*
Jafar at Frollo: "finally, a worthy opponent! out battle will be legendary!"
Yup. And both of them are disgusting.
This is original and very funny. Well done.
Why do I feel like a bunch of these characters still have unaddressed crimes?
Most villains: god like abilities yet only commit a few crimes
Frollo: OBSERVE
I still can't believe Disney was able to create a villain as dark and realistic as Frollo in the late 90s, of all times. Not something you'd see today, or expect to see before that even. BatB, Lion King, and Aladdin were nowhere near as serious.
And HoND still got a G rating
Trmaine-(30 years in jail)
De vil-(40 years in jail with the sequel)
Clayton-(life in prison)
Ursula-(death)
Shan Yu-(Life in prison
Hades-(going to hell by Gods judgement)
Claude-(death)
honestly attempted murder is probably on everyone's list lmao
I enjoyed this very much, I would of liked to have seen how many years you think they’d be in jail. Just throwing that out there, Great video!
You forgot an additional charge for Tremaine; since she lied to an official and destroyed the only glass slipper they had, she was technically interfering with an official investigation.
EDIT: Technically, Cruella would also be facing attempted murder of the second degree, as she would have killed the truck driver as well as the puppies by trying to drive them off the road.
Clayton would also be facing multiple charges for attempted murder, as we see him attempt to shoot Tarzan multiple times throughout the movie.
Shan Yu would also be facing charges for kidnapping an official, as well as murder and theft (since the Huns stole the Chinese dragon for the parade). Not to mention the soldier he ordered shot. Pretty sure there's also a law against flag burning.
Hades' charge for child abduction would technically be child abduction by proxy, as it was Pain and Panic who kidnapped Hercules under his orders. And he would be facing another charge for attempted murder, as he knew the waters of the Well of Souls would be lethal to Hercules, yet had him go in. Though come to think of it, all the monsters he sent after Hercules would be charges of attempted murder and conspiracy. And there's also abuse in the workplace, as he fries Pain and Panic every chance he gets.
Frollo would also be facing charges for attempted child murder. Though I'm not sure about the charges of authorizing torture and ethnic cleansing; as whipping was a legal form of punishment back then, and Frollo's fixation seems to be more on the criminal aspect, such as "thieves and cutpurses, the dregs of humankind all mixed together in a shallow drunken stupor." Many of the gypsies were shown to be criminals; between illegally entering Paris, evading authorities, swindling, false claims of handicap, thievery and attempted murder. Race is never once mentioned to be a motivating factor in Frollo's M.O, so I'd scrub those charges at least.