Subscribe for more funny chess content, and join my Discord server at: / discord Music used in this video: Xomu - Last Dance • Xomu - Last Dance #chess #ChessBut
I think I see why it was so difficult. Your opponent was Canadian. Clearly all the times he didn't take was just him being polite since you hadn't taken anything yourself.
@@MeCantSpell Or all Canadian Grandmasters are at 100 rating, they are so good at giving their opponent an equal oppertunity that they end up losing all their games out of politeness
@@MeCantSpellAs a canadian, I'm pretty sure that our country's grandmasters just don't want the title because they're overly polite and don't want to take the position, so that another "more valuable" candidate can take it instead. Sorry.
im bad at blitz and half the time i miss obvious free pieces because i just assume the opponent wouldn't make such a stupid move. i also do stupid moves under time pressure and then watch my opponent not eat my dudes, presumably because they don't expect people to blunder everything
@@sleepyzeph Never assume your opponent couldn't make a mistake. If the move looks dumb, it probably is. And if it actually includes a trick you didn't notice, it is better to play it out and learn from it.
@@uwesca6263 That's the "Unpaid Actor For Sure" video, where the opponent opened with Bongcloud right before Simp was going to do the same; not the usual type of piece blunders, but a lot of nonsensical king and queen shuffles. I'm also a fan of: "That's A Lot Of Money !!!", another video that Simp ends because the opponent was playing so bad. "He Trapped My Queen ??", where Simp is doing a near-pacifist run; probably the most similar video to this one as far as sustained batshit insanity goes. "He Blundered His Queen The Entire Game", where his opponent blunders their queen on 58% of their moves. "Chess, But My Opponent Doesn't Care About His Woman", where his opponent blunders their queen on 65% of their moves.
This video was agonizing though the Game intself last only for 5 minutes, It felt like 50 minutes, jesuschrist, worst player i've ever seen, he had to made like 25 blunders in like 40 moves
@@mr.e822 However considering how 100 rated players generally behaved in past games, it was entirely possible that this player would have resigned just out of boredom because the game dragged too long. In that case Simp would have won and lost everything.
@@loafes1352 I just realized that Simp himself nearly lost on time after seeing your comment, and also that his opponent was pre-moving like hell towards the end, probably trying to flag him.
@@Bossboko that actually happened before in another challenge where he have to keep the king in the middle of the board. He bongcloud. Opponent copy. He move king up again, opponent still copy. The game eventually ended in a draw after the king tried to touch each other but can’t so they just sidestepping each other 3 times.
I dunno, by that time the opponent has probably realized Simp's not taking any pieces. I'm a fan of 5... Ne4, which was simply breathtaking. Also 15... Bc3, with Simp's reasoning of that move.
His biggest analysis triumph was in the "Approach Him" gay king video, where he moved his king to c7. It was M2 for his opponent either way, but he reasoned that on c7 it required a quiet move from his opponent first. Of course they couldn't find it, lost their queen to a discovery, and abandoned the game even though they *still had a mate in 2.*
I'd like to think that there is a child playing on the other side of the board, which makes this video wholesome. It could have been their first chess victory ever, which may spark interest in chess. They will study openings, tactics, and one day may even beat Karlos Magnum in a tournament - all thanks to Simp and his challenge!
Scientific method : my answers get deleted every time I answer the bot complaining about bots on YT. Is it because I'm tagging the bot, or because I write the word "bot" ? Well, easy to check : just write a message tagging the bot but not saying the word "bot", and a message saying the word "bot" without tagging the bot, see which one gets deleted. Turns out, tagging the bot causes it. _Q. E. D._
I love how long it took for Simp to play moves 6, 12, 16 and 18, just staring in disbelief at how bad the preceding moves were. Nearly lost on time because of it too.
The reason things like this happen in chess is because, at this low a level, not only do people not realise that they can take a piece, but when they DO realise, they will often talk themselves out of taking it because taking it would be "playing right in to your hands." and they're a lot smarter than that. This is honestly true, without any chess knowledge and with the myths of what chess is, people tend to gravitate towards mind games to try to be clever.
I honestly expected this game to end in opponent resignation, thus forfeiting all your earnings. I felt it in my bones, like the existential dread one feels the night before the work week begins anew. But much like your opponent, this game found new ways to surprise and infuriate me.
Well stockfish isn't able to do it. It marks knight sac that leads to mate in one as blunder. Sure stockfish, I will play for another 20 moves in bullet just to not lose my knight.
This may be the greatest video you have ever made! (Or at least out of the ones I seen) I was continuously baffled at how things kept progressing and was even expecting the opponent to randomly resign, abandon the game or stalemate you.
I want to see a challenge were Simp has to win in 10 moves or less. No gimmecks just a quick checkmate so we can actually see how good he is instead of holding him back.
That's not how chess works. Being able to win in 10 moves depends on your opponent more than anything. It would be just the same as the other challenges, not much to do with chess skill but more gambling and trying to predict your opponent's blunders.
This was tremendous to watch! Thank you. I actually understand your opponent, because I do the same thing: I'm seeing my own brilliant plan so blindingly, i don't see what's right in front of me. Granted, in my case, it means I blithely stroll onto squares clearly guarded by five opponent pieces, while your opponent simply ignores your queen standing in front of him asking him to take her. But it's the same principle. Anyway, thanks for another hysterical entry!
I feel your pain chess simp. I work as a chess coach in schools and occasionally I find it’s very difficult to give pieces away against the young kids when they refuse to take them
This is still the funniest of your videos. I just watched it again after some months, and I think for the fourth time, and still kept laughing about it.
4:16 you missed axb7 and either the opponent takes it (which refunds your money) or next turn you promote to queen and wait for the rook to takes you for a net $8
When you realise your opponent has the following rules and thus it becomes a game of chicken: Lose $x for taking certain pieces Get $x if you lose the game
"he'll take it for sure." If your opponent can't see a free queen, there is no way on Earth they can see they can take the knight after trading the rook for the bishop.
he didn't ignore the rules. only the one which was not possible. you cannot lose material without making bad moves (except exchanges which are useless in this challenge), which you can also call a blunder or a sacrifise (if it doesn't give you potential in attack or allows some tactics). how could he lose pieces without sacrifises then? by blundering? it just doesn't make any sense. and like he said in a video, there would be no way to judge if any loss of a piece was a real blunder and not a sacrifise
Hmm, I think the difference between blunder and sacrifice is clear - just ask Stockfish. If it's a good move, it's a sacrifice, if it's a bad move, it's a blunder.
This shows how much of a soul crushing job a paid actor is. No wonder unpaid actors are all there is available.
Long live the unpaid actors
Viva Unpaid Actors
So slaves, right?
@@broccoliyong9319 Not being paid isn’t what makes it slavery, it’s coercion and oppression
@@broccoliyong9319 As the other guys said. Without them, it's called "volunteers"
I think I see why it was so difficult. Your opponent was Canadian. Clearly all the times he didn't take was just him being polite since you hadn't taken anything yourself.
As a canadian I can confirm this is 100% accurate
Is that why there are no Canadian Grandmasters? 😂😂😂
@@MeCantSpell Or all Canadian Grandmasters are at 100 rating, they are so good at giving their opponent an equal oppertunity that they end up losing all their games out of politeness
@@MeCantSpellAs a canadian, I'm pretty sure that our country's grandmasters just don't want the title because they're overly polite and don't want to take the position, so that another "more valuable" candidate can take it instead. Sorry.
😊
It's actually crazy, that this guy attacked the queen and when SImp just let her stay there undefended he just forgot about it
If you don't move, they won't notice you.
he didn't attack the queen. He probably played Nf6 because that's a developing move.
@@ornil That's my guess as well. He didn't even realize he was attacking the queen.
Just proves that Martin is actually very realistic.
Simp was baiting them into moving their knight to the edge of the board, and they knew better than to fall for it!
It truly is impressive how many blunders the opponent made, and how much they refused to take anything.
The true 100 experience
Compare this to Simps only 24 blunders
im bad at blitz and half the time i miss obvious free pieces because i just assume the opponent wouldn't make such a stupid move.
i also do stupid moves under time pressure and then watch my opponent not eat my dudes, presumably because they don't expect people to blunder everything
I refuse to believe he is a real person after all of that.
@@sleepyzeph Never assume your opponent couldn't make a mistake. If the move looks dumb, it probably is. And if it actually includes a trick you didn't notice, it is better to play it out and learn from it.
We’ve seen some incredible gameplay from 100 rated players before, but I think this guy takes the cake for sheer number of WTF moves played.
There was once a player so bad that simp abandoned the challange because he thought that this guy knows simp and therefore played extra bad.
@@uwesca6263 which video?
@@uwesca6263 link please
@@uwesca6263 That's the "Unpaid Actor For Sure" video, where the opponent opened with Bongcloud right before Simp was going to do the same; not the usual type of piece blunders, but a lot of nonsensical king and queen shuffles. I'm also a fan of:
"That's A Lot Of Money !!!", another video that Simp ends because the opponent was playing so bad.
"He Trapped My Queen ??", where Simp is doing a near-pacifist run; probably the most similar video to this one as far as sustained batshit insanity goes.
"He Blundered His Queen The Entire Game", where his opponent blunders their queen on 58% of their moves.
"Chess, But My Opponent Doesn't Care About His Woman", where his opponent blunders their queen on 65% of their moves.
@@lmabacus404thats a lotta video names
I audibly screamed multiple times, I cannot believe he avoided taking your pieces for so long, absolutely insane
This video was agonizing though the Game intself last only for 5 minutes, It felt like 50 minutes, jesuschrist, worst player i've ever seen, he had to made like 25 blunders in like 40 moves
@@jajasking9652 all the misses 💀
@@jajasking9652because he's a paid actor
"I'm not a paid actor, but $20 is $20" - Chess Simp
This deserves a lot of likes
Moreover, $49 is $49.
In this economy, I felt that.
Challenge should have been that he gets paid for every piece of material he loses, but won´t get paid anything if he lost.
this
@@NWRIBronco6 I don't use discord, but if someone else wants to suggest that there then I am fine with it.
Pretty sure you're not going to suggest it because you don't want to pay up. Coward. 😂
That's not how being a payed actor works, but it would make for an interesting challenge.
Good idea actually.
the worst part is that opponent probably walked away thinking he did a good job by "being careful and not capturing everything"
Clearly the opponent was doing a very similar challenge of their own
I think maybe he recognised chess simp and realised he couldnt take.
@@scubasteve6175 or a paid actor
Katie: I won't pay you if you sacrifice pieces
Chess simp: yes you will
Eh, simp could argue that sacrifice means losing pieces for the purpose of gaining a strategic advantage
@@paroperha I daresay money is strategic advantage
I would say if simp throws a piece under fire it is sacrifice, but if opponent attacks and simp does not move it is a blunder.
This is the most hilarious chess video I've seen in a while.
How can losing be this difficult? 😂
You've probably never seen that Nintendo game "Punch Out!" where you literally had to let Average Joe win by decision.
@@xxx_jim_the_reaper_xxx i get it
@@xxx_jim_the_reaper_xxx its not average joe, its glass joe
@@oyungogdfrust4136
His name is still Joe either way.
@@xxx_jim_the_reaper_xxx W- Who's Joe?
Without any context, this game is one of those games that should be watched with Damedane playing in its background
Levy should make a video about it.
@@RGC_animation please someone send this game to levy
On kazoo or recorder.
@@rockstermaniac
Send it for guess the elo.
Would be hilarious to see levy lose his mind
@@Legendendear "What's the elo? Uhh.... Negative 50?"
Part of me dreaded he'd give away all the materials and then get stalemated.
That wouldn’t count as a win, so at the very least he wouldn’t lose all his money. But, he would fail to get the extra $20 for losing.
@@mr.e822 However considering how 100 rated players generally behaved in past games, it was entirely possible that this player would have resigned just out of boredom because the game dragged too long. In that case Simp would have won and lost everything.
@@JannPoo What a humiliation that would be.
I was envisioning his opponent not knowing how to checkmate and eventually running out of time
@@loafes1352 I just realized that Simp himself nearly lost on time after seeing your comment, and also that his opponent was pre-moving like hell towards the end, probably trying to flag him.
if you went for the bong cloud, maybe the opponent would too
100 rated players don’t know about accepting a bingcloud
@@Bossboko no, but they might mimic what you're doing because they think YOU know what you're doing
But accepted bong cloud will 100% end in a draw.
@@Bossboko that actually happened before in another challenge where he have to keep the king in the middle of the board. He bongcloud. Opponent copy. He move king up again, opponent still copy. The game eventually ended in a draw after the king tried to touch each other but can’t so they just sidestepping each other 3 times.
@@user-ti4di1uh2d
So its probably a bad idea for 2 bongclouds, right?
Nobody wants a draw.
When he moved his queen into a position to be taken by 2 knights at the same time is the funniest thing ever
I dunno, by that time the opponent has probably realized Simp's not taking any pieces. I'm a fan of 5... Ne4, which was simply breathtaking. Also 15... Bc3, with Simp's reasoning of that move.
Pawn jump queen! Bishop jump queen! Rook jump queen! Gang bang!
Your pieces and pawns got so entangled with your opponent's, it looked like a "I'm Better Than My Viewers" starting position. 😂
2:20 is the moment you broke my smile into laughter
"The plan is simple: if I move my knight, he'll move his knight.
Exactly as planned" 😂
"I solemnly swear that this guy is not a paid actor"
Or as he once said, "I solemnly swear this guy is not a paid actor, or at least, not paid by me."
4:47 Text to speech got so mad that it started to show emotion
They are starting to believe!
24 blunders. This game proved that game played perfectly doesnt always end with a draw
I love simp's psychological analysis of what makes 100 rated players move certain pieces.
the absolutely flawless analysis of "if i move my knight, he moves his knight"
His biggest analysis triumph was in the "Approach Him" gay king video, where he moved his king to c7. It was M2 for his opponent either way, but he reasoned that on c7 it required a quiet move from his opponent first. Of course they couldn't find it, lost their queen to a discovery, and abandoned the game even though they *still had a mate in 2.*
Remember that this gentleman is rated 106, which means he has won at least one game.
His opponent probably resigned, only way he could have won
he may have rolled down from 400
This guy couldn't beat Martin.
Ahahaha!
this guy is a paid actor
This was incredibly *painful* to watch I literally gasped so many times and I shouted “WHAT” so loud at his Bishop D2 my roommate came to check on me
Bishop D2 had huuuuge "The horse took the ELEVATOR? I didn't know horses could DO that" energy.
I haven't laughed so much in a long time over a chess video. This was genuinely unbelievable how he found new unthinkable options almost every move
"I'm better than my viewers. But this guy, and only this guy, is my equal."
I was mentally preparing for the opponent to resign after realizing they blundered their queen
That would have been too funny lol
I'm not watching chess simp after this
?
same
@@leopoldotactico Reference to the title of the vid
Fair is fair
I deem your mission… Accomplished
And no I'm not Katie
heh
Woah!!! WOAAAHHH!!!!!!
Woah
1:55
I snifflaughed real hard, never lose faith in the 100 rated players' ability to baffle scientists
This was the perfect opponent for this challenge
I'd like to think that there is a child playing on the other side of the board, which makes this video wholesome. It could have been their first chess victory ever, which may spark interest in chess. They will study openings, tactics, and one day may even beat Karlos Magnum in a tournament - all thanks to Simp and his challenge!
surprised the guy can even checkmate at the end, that might be an accident
"That blunders a queen and a fork at the same time, so of course !
I'll push a pawn"
Genius.
Are my answers deleted because I say the word bot?
Scientific method :
my answers get deleted every time I answer the bot complaining about bots on YT. Is it because I'm tagging the bot, or because I write the word "bot" ?
Well, easy to check : just write a message tagging the bot but not saying the word "bot", and a message saying the word "bot" without tagging the bot, see which one gets deleted.
Turns out, tagging the bot causes it. _Q. E. D._
Yup, works very well. Anything you say tagging the bot back gets deleted in approximately 10 seconds. Almost funny to play with.
I love how long it took for Simp to play moves 6, 12, 16 and 18, just staring in disbelief at how bad the preceding moves were. Nearly lost on time because of it too.
What if, the guy who proppsed this challange actually paid your opponent to take as little as he could without raising any suspision? 😳
The reason things like this happen in chess is because, at this low a level, not only do people not realise that they can take a piece, but when they DO realise, they will often talk themselves out of taking it because taking it would be "playing right in to your hands." and they're a lot smarter than that.
This is honestly true, without any chess knowledge and with the myths of what chess is, people tend to gravitate towards mind games to try to be clever.
You see the same thing at the poker table all the time. Once someone only thinks you could be bluffing, you've won half the battle.
Almost had a brain aneurysm watching this dude from Canada try to play something that looks like Chess
Almost ran out of time there, that would have been an embarrassing way to lose a "lose the game" challenge.
I genuinely can't understand how that person was so bad at chess... It's a miracle they checkmated you...
The opponent must have been playing a "no green in the analysis" challenge, I can't explain this game in any other way.
I honestly expected this game to end in opponent resignation, thus forfeiting all your earnings. I felt it in my bones, like the existential dread one feels the night before the work week begins anew.
But much like your opponent, this game found new ways to surprise and infuriate me.
Monday morning is indeed the worst time of the week
"I solemly swear, that I'm a paid actor"
- Chess Simp, probably
"There's no way to tell a difference between a blunder and a sacrifice" then 2:54 LOL
Well stockfish isn't able to do it. It marks knight sac that leads to mate in one as blunder. Sure stockfish, I will play for another 20 moves in bullet just to not lose my knight.
@@mariuszpudzianowski8400 I bet you forgot that your opponent doesn't have to take the knight.
Legit one of the funniest videos on this channel, that was 49 dollars well spent to whoever did that
This may be the greatest video you have ever made! (Or at least out of the ones I seen) I was continuously baffled at how things kept progressing and was even expecting the opponent to randomly resign, abandon the game or stalemate you.
Imagine if he removed the "25 bucks if checkmated with pawn" and they actually managed to do it.
Twisting the game like that is liable to cost more than it gains.
Plot twist opponent is a also a paid actor 😂 but doesn't know about it .
I want to see a challenge were Simp has to win in 10 moves or less. No gimmecks just a quick checkmate so we can actually see how good he is instead of holding him back.
If you want to suggest a challenge I suggest joining the discord server
this would just be the seal clubbing challenge though.
So basically, you're asking him to be a smurf?
He already did one for 5 moves or less
That's not how chess works. Being able to win in 10 moves depends on your opponent more than anything. It would be just the same as the other challenges, not much to do with chess skill but more gambling and trying to predict your opponent's blunders.
So he will finally follow his dream occupation which is being A PAID ACTOR
If you queen with a pawn and lose the queen, technically you lost 10 points of material
"That blunders the queen and the fork at the same time, so of course, I'll push a pawn."
This was tremendous to watch! Thank you.
I actually understand your opponent, because I do the same thing: I'm seeing my own brilliant plan so blindingly, i don't see what's right in front of me. Granted, in my case, it means I blithely stroll onto squares clearly guarded by five opponent pieces, while your opponent simply ignores your queen standing in front of him asking him to take her. But it's the same principle.
Anyway, thanks for another hysterical entry!
I usually always learn something watching these.... But this one. I learned nothing lol what a strange opponent
I feel your pain chess simp. I work as a chess coach in schools and occasionally I find it’s very difficult to give pieces away against the young kids when they refuse to take them
I guess he payed your opponent even more money not to take any of your pieces.
The funny thing is that this guy 100% believes this was his best game ever.
I bet this game gave stockfish a brain aneurysm
Man this must have been painful to play, but it was super fun to watch!!
I was half expecting Simp to snap and slam out a quick checkmate just to hurt this guy as much as they hurt him.
The secret of this match is that the opponent had the same challenge. It's the only possible explanation.
This dude was either doing his own challenge or is proof of alien life.
Technically he followed the last rule. He didn't sacrifice any pieces, he blundered them all
plot twist: the other guy was a regular paid actor but thought he's still being paid to lose in this game
Goes to show sometimes you are your own worst enemy, the dude probably just kept overthinking
I have a dreadful suspicion that guy thinks this was a really interesting and dynamic game, hunting your king like that
It's hard to win against grand masters. But it's also hard to lose against grand noobs.
3:59 the way he just didnt say anything else after "i hate this game" ☠
At some point I was thinking that opponent would have forced you to mate him.
When he put himself in two forks simultaneously, I just couldn’t take it
This is still the funniest of your videos. I just watched it again after some months, and I think for the fourth time, and still kept laughing about it.
The opponent rating of 106 makes me wonder if they are a smurf, trying to get their rating down to 100.
4:16 you missed axb7 and either the opponent takes it (which refunds your money) or next turn you promote to queen and wait for the rook to takes you for a net $8
And then the opponent just doesn't take with the Rook and you lose a $. Congrats. Quit trying to backseat.
opponent sees the new queen and resigns
mission failed
This guy makes martin looks like a gm 😂
When you realise your opponent has the following rules and thus it becomes a game of chicken:
Lose $x for taking certain pieces
Get $x if you lose the game
whenever he would move his king instead of taking id die a little on the inside
That guy was so bad that we can't even call him a paid actor 😂
I don't think I've ever seen someone blunder their queen so many times in one game. This guy HAS to be a paid actor
That’s the second person in the series who’s bank account is gonna deplete faster than when pet sim x brought out their new $250 plushie
The opponent has his own challenge
"he'll take it for sure."
If your opponent can't see a free queen, there is no way on Earth they can see they can take the knight after trading the rook for the bishop.
I've learned so much about chess. I'm going to start playing this way. I've been trying to get back to 400 ELO for awhile
Back down or back up? 🙃
If i was the guy who sent the challenge I'd not pay him a cent for ignoring the rules regardless if he lost or won.
he didn't ignore the rules. only the one which was not possible. you cannot lose material without making bad moves (except exchanges which are useless in this challenge), which you can also call a blunder or a sacrifise (if it doesn't give you potential in attack or allows some tactics). how could he lose pieces without sacrifises then? by blundering? it just doesn't make any sense. and like he said in a video, there would be no way to judge if any loss of a piece was a real blunder and not a sacrifise
"I didn't even know that was an option" 😂😂😂
I'd absolutely love to see the accuracy of this game
"I didn't even know that was an option" just killed me
After countless battles against paid actors, Simp became one of them.
Truly saddest character development.
Oponent let his cat play for him 😂
"I hate this game" " How losing pieces is more difficult than winning them"
I can't have been the only one begging for the opponent to resign or abandon the game
100 rated chess, but you have to win by checkmate with at least 6 points material disadvantage
“Your woman, your choice”
-Chess simp, 2023
I have no idea how you managed to pump so much emotion into saying "check" with text to speech. It's bewildering. (4:46)
The pro move would be to promote your pawns so you have more queens for your opponent to take and more chances to earn $9.
I think what he meant by don't sacrifice or blunder is like, if your piece is attacked you should move it and don't go to opponent's controlled square
Plot twist: the guy on the other side was also doing this challenge.
Hmm, I think the difference between blunder and sacrifice is clear - just ask Stockfish. If it's a good move, it's a sacrifice, if it's a bad move, it's a blunder.
When you are paid actor but the opponent too
POV: You’re stockfish wondering what the heck is going on
To enter the mind of a 100 rated player would be such a gift