Explosive Comet | Messerschmitt Me 163B Komet

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 27

  • @Allan_aka_RocKITEman
    @Allan_aka_RocKITEman Рік тому +2

    What amazes me most is they are STILL the ONLY rocket-propelled fighter aircraft used in combat.

  • @BDbean
    @BDbean Рік тому +16

    Ah yes, the Pinnacle of german engineering, killing more pilots that enemies.

  • @BrettLloyd-z5x
    @BrettLloyd-z5x 11 місяців тому +2

    The komets did shoot down some b17s but alot were lost to blowing up on takeoff and landing

    • @Gunthazv2
      @Gunthazv2 8 місяців тому

      9 kills 11 deaths I think, all accidents

    • @TinyBearTim
      @TinyBearTim 3 місяці тому

      @@Gunthazv2do crashes or issues count towards the combat record or only deaths due to being shot ?

    • @Gunthazv2
      @Gunthazv2 3 місяці тому

      @@TinyBearTim I believe it is only crashes/issues that caused the deaths, a few may have been caught on the ground after the allies realised there was 0 point chasing it till it almost landed

    • @TinyBearTim
      @TinyBearTim 3 місяці тому

      @@Gunthazv2 there are stories of people being melted by the fuel when it leaked in to the cabin

    • @Gunthazv2
      @Gunthazv2 3 місяці тому

      @@TinyBearTim yes the fuel was extremely volatile, contact with anything other than the fuel tank would cause ignition, including fabric (they had specialised gloves but not suits)

  • @glennquagmire1747
    @glennquagmire1747 Рік тому +2

    Amazing aviation technology back then

    • @CUTECATSTUDIOS
      @CUTECATSTUDIOS Рік тому +5

      And as always we learned they were too little too late

  • @jm131719
    @jm131719 Рік тому

    I seem to recall that there was a proposal for a pusher prop version of this plane. I womder of this might have been safer for the pilots and how it would have performed,

    • @kyle857
      @kyle857 Рік тому +1

      It would have performed like all pushers of the inter war period. Worse than they expected while it constantly overheated.

  • @Yot-001
    @Yot-001 6 місяців тому

    ...fascinating aircraft, sans doute.

  • @Gunthazv2
    @Gunthazv2 8 місяців тому

    Hanna described it like flying a bowling ball

  • @sulphurPete
    @sulphurPete 8 місяців тому

    Best airplane..to go for a "rip" I recall flying these..in my former life.

  • @andrewjansen9702
    @andrewjansen9702 Рік тому

    I wonder if it came with pumps so you can dump the fuel?

  • @BloodyCrow__
    @BloodyCrow__ Рік тому

    Wonder if they put all the resources from this thing into jets if they would have a cheap early jet.

    • @TinyBearTim
      @TinyBearTim 3 місяці тому

      This isn’t using a jet engine , there were jets before the 262 that could have gone in to combat but there was no reason too
      There were 262s and other jets with boosters tho

  • @DanielJacobs-t8q
    @DanielJacobs-t8q 4 місяці тому

    You only live twice Mr bond

  • @Agentsmith2684
    @Agentsmith2684 Рік тому +1

    Why do UA-camrs keep putting on backing music to commentaries, it sucks

  • @michaelcline3123
    @michaelcline3123 5 місяців тому

    you know of course. that the winner of any war. is going to say . that the enemys grear was crap --dont you ?

  • @aurorajones8481
    @aurorajones8481 8 місяців тому +1

    Would i have flown it? HELL NO. Dear god no. I can barely contain myself in a Cesna! Absolutely not. But if i were comfortable and proficient as a pilot. Maybe.

    • @TinyBearTim
      @TinyBearTim 3 місяці тому

      As much as the fuel being slightly warmer and the tubes being slightly colder than normal could cause it to explode

  • @pierredecine1936
    @pierredecine1936 8 місяців тому

    370 was a lot !

  • @BloodyCrow__
    @BloodyCrow__ Рік тому

    Gaijin: hm yes its superior to mig 15