Unbroken | Aircraft with No Hydraulics or Brakes

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,6 тис.

  • @briquetaverne
    @briquetaverne 2 роки тому +564

    I worked in a factory when I was young with a former sergeant of the 8th AF in WWII who was the top turret gunner. After his 17th mission he was wounded. He said he didn't even know it until after they'd returned to base. The blood had filled his boot and congealed. He was sent to the field hospital, given a purple heart and after 8 weeks of convalescence, was back in the turret flying missions over Yugoslavia. These guys were born tough.

    • @HappyHusbandnWife
      @HappyHusbandnWife 2 роки тому +31

      American solider these day would drop on the floor & crying if their fellow calls they by wrong pronounce

    • @blameyourself4489
      @blameyourself4489 2 роки тому +21

      These guys had no choice. Today you have.

    • @hackhack9034
      @hackhack9034 2 роки тому +5

      @@HappyHusbandnWife 🤣bruh violated

    • @HappyHusbandnWife
      @HappyHusbandnWife 2 роки тому +2

      @@hackhack9034 Dont get emotional damage on the battle field bruh

    • @t-jh4236
      @t-jh4236 2 роки тому +11

      Peace has made us soft. There is a morale to the story of the Knights of the Round Table. Even the best and bravest lose their way in times of peace. Men were born to be warriors. We do not know what to do with ourselves in times of peace.

  • @stevekeeler9201
    @stevekeeler9201 2 роки тому +1052

    That exact thing happened to my father in WWII. He was a B17 pilot and they got their hydraulics shot up and had no brakes. they turned around and made it to an emergency runway in Belgium (late oct '44). He had the tail gunner strap his parachute to the frame of the plane and, as they touched down, throw the chute out the hatch that the tail gunner was supposed to use. It stopped the plane and they all walked away. Dad got his purple heart for that one. As a funny aside....as they walked away from the plane they turned around and looked at the plane and a local citizen was in the process of cutting the parachute strings so he could steal the parachute material.

    • @ispartacus1337
      @ispartacus1337 2 роки тому +36

      Purple heart for an "injured plane?"

    • @nightdrv
      @nightdrv 2 роки тому +28

      Jesus.. people will steal anything

    • @deathsquadron3311
      @deathsquadron3311 2 роки тому

      your dad just made a drag chute that will be commonly use by military jet aircraft in the 50s and beyond

    • @fhlostonparaphrase
      @fhlostonparaphrase 2 роки тому +109

      @@nightdrv Well...in wartime things are especially scarce, but yeah, I get your drift.

    • @kored8688
      @kored8688 2 роки тому +10

      Huh. I didn't even know that the tail gunner had his own hatch.
      What's your dads name, and what kind of wounds did he sustain?

  • @ijustmakegamesnow906
    @ijustmakegamesnow906 3 роки тому +621

    My granddad was a tailgunner and later pilot of a flying fortress over Germany. I watch this, and I'm just instantly sucked into total concern for these poor crazy brave boys and terror knowing some wouldn't come back, and wondering how anyone could stuff themselves into a ball turret or a tailgun station willingly. I just love these boys.

    • @homerfry9234
      @homerfry9234 3 роки тому +16

      How do you go from an enlisted tail gunner to an officer flying the aircraft? Sounds like granddad did a little embellishment

    • @ijustmakegamesnow906
      @ijustmakegamesnow906 3 роки тому +50

      @@homerfry9234 Thanks for the insult. The military has something called Officer Candidate training. He was sent to learn to fly. How about your grandad?

    • @upstatecowhorseproductions5040
      @upstatecowhorseproductions5040 2 роки тому +20

      @@homerfry9234 look at SGT Murphy and others going from Privates to Sergeant to LT to CPT..... also between the world wars they allowed some to go onto commands and schools and other jobs. Different military then than now. I believe this happened. I'm glad your grandfather made it through the war.

    • @МихаилМаксимов-ф5в
      @МихаилМаксимов-ф5в 2 роки тому

      А вы обожаете детей женщин стариков на которых падали эти бомбы с обеих сторон конечно же

    • @josephdibble964
      @josephdibble964 2 роки тому +21

      @@homerfry9234 uninformed AND rude.

  • @THEBULLETPROOFGARAGE
    @THEBULLETPROOFGARAGE Рік тому +94

    The Greatest Generation. God bless them. No shortage of stories like this.

    • @spitfeueranna
      @spitfeueranna 3 місяці тому

      A generation that embraced fascism and tried to take over the world, destroyed many things, burned through natural resources like no other, and nvked two civilian cities. You have to include the Germans, the Japanese, the Russians, and the Italians too. They were all the same generation. You can't pick and chose.

  • @waynet2165
    @waynet2165 3 роки тому +1030

    I had an uncle who was a tail gunner in the Pacific... He said, nobody will never know how many of our own planes we shot down by accident of course, but believe me it was a lot. Seems that these planes fly at incredibly fast speeds and its often difficult to see their markings.

    • @floatingchimney
      @floatingchimney 3 роки тому +59

      Friendly planes will not fly directly at you with machine guns blazing.
      If they making a turn directly for your plane - it's the enemy.

    • @JohnnyThund3r
      @JohnnyThund3r 3 роки тому +127

      @@floatingchimney Indeed he was talking about how many planes they would accidentally shoot in their own formation while leading a Zero.

    • @MrGoatFish10
      @MrGoatFish10 3 роки тому +18

      *Zero* was a long-range carrier-based fighter aircraft formerly manufactured by Mitsubishi Aircraft Company.

    • @teo2975
      @teo2975 3 роки тому +19

      @@JohnnyThund3r Wayne is talking about markings. The gunners on the bombers would not be mistaking fighters for bombers so markings are irrelevant and the OP is not correct. as far as hitting friendly bombers by leading the target, maybe but that was actually rare since not doing so was a core part of gunner training

    • @JohnnyThund3r
      @JohnnyThund3r 3 роки тому +62

      @@teo2975 I think the OPs point is when you're actually in combat you end up making a lot more mistakes... and a lot of times, you just don't talk about it.

  • @MondoBeno
    @MondoBeno 3 роки тому +797

    They don't mention it specifically in the history books, but these bomber crews got more baby faced as the war progressed. I knew of one pilot who was flying in combat at 19, because they were losing so many air crews.

    • @welshpete12
      @welshpete12 3 роки тому +63

      They were the bravest of to brave . Going out day after day . I had the privilege of knowing a few that were in the RAF . One showed me a photograph taken during the war . Old eyes on a young face .

    • @dividendenkontor
      @dividendenkontor 2 роки тому +20

      @@welshpete12 Brave? What the bombing and burning of the civilians? 76.000 children killed, wow, brave. Hell is big enough for more than one man

    • @steveguild871
      @steveguild871 2 роки тому +21

      @@dividendenkontor Said the snowflake.

    • @BigMek456
      @BigMek456 2 роки тому +7

      @@steveguild871 If youre against killing civilians youre a snow flake

    • @Metalbringer92
      @Metalbringer92 2 роки тому +23

      Mark Peters tell that to the Japanese murdering their way trough south-east Asia. You don't want civilian being bombed? Don't start a war.
      Funny thing is UA-cam doesn't allow me to write specific words describing what they did, especially to young girls and kids. Guess the woke snowflake lords don't like hearing the truth.

  • @CyrilSneer123
    @CyrilSneer123 3 роки тому +2087

    Wow it's so quiet inside that plane they can speak to each other like they were sat in a room.

    • @LonoTheOno
      @LonoTheOno 3 роки тому +442

      And no wind coming in through all those open gunports and bullet holes. I guess Ms. Jolie didn't watch any bomber movies before making this, and didn't bother with a technical advisor. Too bad, I read the book, and it deserved better than this.

    • @jonathanlee5314
      @jonathanlee5314 3 роки тому +57

      @@LonoTheOno I have a good one for you - would recommend reading "The Mighty Eighth" by Gerald Astor. It looks mostly at the Eighth Air Force in Europe (who took more casualties in WW2 than the entire Marine Corps).

    • @Keys879
      @Keys879 3 роки тому +210

      Notice the 'necklace' they have on? It's shown clearly in the first scene at around the 1:10 mark and on. That is a microphone system which sits directly on your neck/vocal chord area. A relatively re-emerging technology today that got its' start in WWII with bomber crews. Required no 'boom mic' like traditional headsets you might be used to today. But they did pay attention to detail in this video, you just didn't know it.

    • @vk2ig
      @vk2ig 3 роки тому +181

      @@Keys879 The other problem would be this: if Hollywood accurately re-created the amount of noise in an aircraft like that, then the audience would find the scene very tiring to listen to - it is just such a noisy environment.
      Even today in piston engined light aircraft featured in UA-cam videos posted by pilots, the camera audio muste be patched in from the intercom, as otherwise the viewers would have difficulty hearing what's being said - the resulting audio in such videos tends to lead viewers who aren't familiar with aircraft operations to incorrect conclusions. (Anyone who doubts this should go for a ride in a "lightie" and see for themselves.)

    • @DawgPro
      @DawgPro 3 роки тому +51

      @@vk2ig Spot on! My father was a navigator on Lancasters... by age 60, he was deaf.

  • @snowleopard1918
    @snowleopard1918 Рік тому +65

    Wow, it’s amazing the courage of those young lads. Your bravery and what you did will never be forgotten. Thank you to all the men and women protecting freedom wherever you are.

    • @saitylmaz5414
      @saitylmaz5414 11 місяців тому +1

      heroic pilots who bombed cities in Germany and Japan and killed hundreds of thousands of women and children

    • @johnnytower6169
      @johnnytower6169 7 місяців тому +2

      I used to have a British hurricane pilot come in to a store I worked at in Australia in my early 20’s. He had some funny ideas about modern life but when he spoke about his service I was in awe. He wore his old wings every time I saw him. The way he spoke about his aircraft, the way it “was a lovely bird, such a lovely bird, always got me home”. I felt honoured to hear him speak about it, I recall him saying it pulled to one side but he never minded
      A slightly older woman I worked with hated it, she was like “get over it mate, it’s done, we don’t need to keep hearing about it”, but she was dead wrong, how could you not experience something so visceral and not share it, especially in your twilight years
      I never got his name but I’ll never forget our conversations, a real gentleman who never spoke about the “action”, just a huge respect for his aircraft

  • @djg585
    @djg585 3 роки тому +564

    A war movie scene where pervasive noise makes it difficult to understand what is being said may be realistic, but would be unacceptably frustrating for the audience.

    • @mikes5637
      @mikes5637 3 роки тому +24

      Tenet, anyone?

    • @tradracemixer3237
      @tradracemixer3237 3 роки тому +5

      just turn on the subtitles

    • @djg585
      @djg585 3 роки тому +12

      @@tradracemixer3237
      Not quite the same ambience as listening to the dialogue.

    • @wayneroberts4144
      @wayneroberts4144 3 роки тому +3

      Yes it would be MUCH LOUDER in there.

    • @echo2039
      @echo2039 3 роки тому +4

      Dunkirk proves otherwise

  • @hattrick5076
    @hattrick5076 2 роки тому +15

    Everyone always say that the greatest generation are brave and tough, the truth of it is that these are the very same exact people who lived through the Great Depression when they were younger watching their parents loose their house, or even their friends parents loose their house. With no jobs to be had and the country utterly broke for 10 years or more starting in 1929.
    Nobody just couldn't go out and buy what they needed from the local hardware store, so they had to "stretch it out" they had to "make due" and make it last. It is little wonder what made them so brave and so tough. This is why they are called THE GREATEST GENERATION. They were forced into taking something from nothing and make it outstanding. My grandparents told me all about the Great Depression, and its pitfalls, how neighbor helped out their neighbor if they could. Call it ingenuity call it gumption, call it what you want to. But without these brave and tough boys fighting to preserve our way of life, what we call the greatest generation.this Much respect goes out to what we call THE GREATEST GENERATION. without them, we would not have a country called the United States of America.

    • @valerieclark4580
      @valerieclark4580 2 роки тому

      Great post.

    • @hattrick5076
      @hattrick5076 2 роки тому +3

      @@valerieclark4580 Thank you Valerie I, myself was raised up by WW11 family members. My Great Uncle Rip was a tank commander. He, along with his regiment along with the Canadians broke into a concentration camp saving 120,000 jewish men women and children. The GREATEST GENERATION indeed.

    • @gentlemanvontweed7147
      @gentlemanvontweed7147 7 місяців тому

      Let's not forget that the Great Depression was probably a major factor in the world descending into WWII.
      Not a slight to the people of that generation - they made the best out of what they had. And many preformed admirably.

  • @NK-qn6pq
    @NK-qn6pq 3 роки тому +625

    That top turret gunner deserves a medal.

    • @mustangcody
      @mustangcody 3 роки тому +116

      Bottom gunners had it worse, you are trapped in a rotating sphere that can be only enter exited from the outside of the plan through an hatch. You lay inside in a fetal position with the gun to your chest and the barrels/aiming at your feet. They were highly prone to damage if they got shot causing it to stop rotating, and there is an emergency hatch to parachute out of at the top, however if it was damage and could not move anymore, you're screwed and can't escape if the hatch is in an position away towards the plane.
      Plus its freezing cold since you're technically outside the plan.

    • @NK-qn6pq
      @NK-qn6pq 3 роки тому +36

      @@mustangcody well, the top gunner got hit but still shot down an enemy plane.

    • @vk2ig
      @vk2ig 3 роки тому +61

      @@mustangcody Actually the ball turret *can* be entered and exited from inside the aircraft - that's the normal way of accessing the turret and vice versa. But the turret has to be rotated to the correct position otherwise the hatch cannot be opened. That was why many ball turret gunners were lost in damaged aircraft - very hard to rotate the turret if the power is out, or there is damage to the turret training gear, or the turret gunner themselves are incapacitated.

    • @jonathanlee5314
      @jonathanlee5314 3 роки тому +44

      @@vk2ig I've read stories where the ball turret was damaged, and as the gunner could not extricate himself, he was crushed when the plane crash-landed. Awful.

    • @michaelwier1222
      @michaelwier1222 3 роки тому +33

      @@jonathanlee5314 Andy Rooney (war correspondent) told of an incident such as this. The ball turret gunner knew he was going to die, and how he was going to die. His only request was that his mother not be told how he died.
      That interview with Andy Rooney can probably still be found on YT someplace.

  • @redwulf509
    @redwulf509 2 роки тому +103

    As one bomber crew put it, "in the army you can go days without seeing the enemy, but when you go up in the bombers, you get shot at every single time" (i forgot the exact quote but its something like that, and they aint kidding, truelly brave young men, The Greatest Generation!)

    • @Spudtron98
      @Spudtron98 2 роки тому +21

      Bomber Command had the worst casualty ratio in the entire British military. Each crew had to survive thirty operations to get out. Some crews went back for more afterwards. They seriously got messed up.

    • @danslater1542
      @danslater1542 2 роки тому +6

      In the UK, they were all volunteers. Not sure about USAF.

    • @Smoerni
      @Smoerni 2 роки тому

      @@Spudtron98 Everything in the War, that resembled a tin can, and where you cannot just simply step out, due to the hostile enviroment surounding you, is a death trap.
      Bombers, Uboats doesnt matter stay away from it.
      German U-Boats for example had a Casulty Rate of 75%. Highest of all German forces during the war.
      I dont want to know, how Space Crafts in the future will cut of...

    • @thursdaythought7201
      @thursdaythought7201 Рік тому +3

      @@danslater1542 USAF didn't exist back then. It was the Army Air Corp. They weren't volunteers, especially towards the end of the war most of them were draftees.

  • @abundantYOUniverse
    @abundantYOUniverse 2 роки тому +52

    24 is the second loudest airplane I have ever been in. The B-25 is the first. You could scream into someone's ear as loud as you could muster, and they wouldn't hear you.

    • @hatman4818
      @hatman4818 2 роки тому +6

      Some of these radial engines straight piped exhaust. Early B-25s had every piston straight piping exhausy straight out of the cylinder.
      This made noise so horrible and intolerable for the crew that there was actually a modification to the design to add proper exhast pipes that directed the noise away from the crew.

    • @KB4QAA
      @KB4QAA 2 роки тому +2

      @@hatman4818 They were called "Short Stack Exhaust", typically only 4-5 inches long. At night you could see the flame.

    • @randycarey7487
      @randycarey7487 Рік тому +1

      so true shot up as well the noise in there would be very loud

  • @jmccallion2394
    @jmccallion2394 Рік тому +74

    Great to see the B24 getting some recognition for once!

    • @Loulovesspeed
      @Loulovesspeed Рік тому +2

      @j McCallion - Might have been built at The Willow Run Plant at Ford Motor Co. Ford's 40,000 workers here assembled over 8,600 of these beauties at the rate of almost one per hour! The Willow Run Plant was specifically built for this job and was the largest factory under one roof in the world - just over 1 mile long.

    • @tinglydingle
      @tinglydingle Рік тому

      Odd comment, it was the most prolific American bomber in WW2.

    • @jmccallion2394
      @jmccallion2394 Рік тому

      @@tinglydingle Well when you think of four engine bomber in the US its 9 out 10 the B17!

    • @Loulovesspeed
      @Loulovesspeed Рік тому +5

      @@jmccallion2394 - The B17 does seem to get more film time, but the fact remains that only 12,731 B17s were made, compared to 18,493 B24 Liberators. 😁

    • @jmccallion2394
      @jmccallion2394 Рік тому +2

      @@Loulovesspeed 100 per cent correct!

  • @abdullahibrahim667
    @abdullahibrahim667 3 роки тому +52

    I love how the pilot says-" we are here"💥

  • @pervertt
    @pervertt 3 роки тому +248

    Who needs fighter cover when a single B24 can knock off so many Zeroes?

    • @teo2975
      @teo2975 3 роки тому +46

      I agree it is absurd, but you see that kind of exaggeration in air combat films going back to the 1920s. The real danger in flying a bomber in the pacific was being in a b-29. My grandmother's brother died in a b-29 that had two engines catch fire without even being hit

    • @pervertt
      @pervertt 3 роки тому +11

      @@teo2975 I know, cinematic licence. I'm sure Ms Jolie didn't have plane buffs in mind when she directed this movie.

    • @vosileypupkin
      @vosileypupkin 3 роки тому +7

      ...shooting straight to the crosshair

    • @richardrichard5409
      @richardrichard5409 3 роки тому +16

      That's some quiet B24😊.....most aircrew had hearing issues before they even finished a tour.

    • @jehoiakimelidoronila5450
      @jehoiakimelidoronila5450 3 роки тому +4

      @@teo2975 the bomber he's on is one of the early variants. Major problem is the engines overheating.

  • @HighExplosiveDualPurpose40mm
    @HighExplosiveDualPurpose40mm 2 роки тому +24

    I fought in the battle of Fallujah 2004 the intensity of the fight still surges through my veins .. You could literally smell the adrenaline off the enemy. .. oh "the sweet smell of victory ". My heart goes out to these brave Warfighters

  • @dvvalant
    @dvvalant 2 роки тому +53

    My dad was a gunner on the B24 Liberator in the Pacific. He said the Japanese would often fly above them and drop incendiaries down on them trying to set the bombers on fire.

  • @stephenmadison3401
    @stephenmadison3401 3 роки тому +184

    I read the book. He describes being on the life raft in the ocean and seeing angels floating above him having a conversation and then being "rescued" by the Japanese. Compelling

    • @Steelmage99
      @Steelmage99 3 роки тому +1

      Compelling?

    • @workonesabs
      @workonesabs 2 роки тому +5

      The hunger mustve been terrible then into the clutches of the Japanese for the rest of the war...

    • @ばるばすがう
      @ばるばすがう 2 роки тому +2

      あまりの数が降伏したから日本軍の食糧を分けてあげたんだよ?

    • @riforgiate74
      @riforgiate74 2 роки тому +1

      Amazing book.

    • @riforgiate74
      @riforgiate74 2 роки тому +4

      @@workonesabs They were eating birds and fish raw, while trying to fight off sharks. One of the crew ate their rations the first night. They were in the raft for 47 days.

  • @Strykenine
    @Strykenine 3 роки тому +119

    The Liberator never gets and love. Everyone loves the 17's and the 29's, but they built 10,000 B-24 Liberators. They earned the name.

    • @GuitarMan22
      @GuitarMan22 3 роки тому +5

      They werent the heavy lifters as the 29s or especially the Lancaster. 10000 made though couldn't have been that bad

    • @michaelwier1222
      @michaelwier1222 3 роки тому +7

      @@GuitarMan22 They also couldn't take the punishment that the 17's could, but still a wonderful plane. The total built was closer to 18,000.

    • @WEBB-TECH
      @WEBB-TECH 3 роки тому +5

      Same with the Halifax and Stirling!

    • @GuitarMan22
      @GuitarMan22 3 роки тому +2

      @@WEBB-TECH those 2 were definitely underappreciated. Doesnt help that there is no flying examples of those.

    • @dustpanandthebrush5293
      @dustpanandthebrush5293 3 роки тому +6

      I think the liberator is quite an attractive looker to be honest , the 17 is sleek alright but the 24 looks like a brawler

  • @doogood13
    @doogood13 3 роки тому +177

    ...it's so loud from the engines in those planes that you can't hear yourself think... talking normally is out of the question. But it is a terrific scene....

    • @Julian_Bolt
      @Julian_Bolt 3 роки тому +14

      that is actually accurate of aircraft of that time period, I researched a lot about ww2 airplanes for a project and I genuinely like aircraft of that time period. I interviewed several ww2 pilots who said that the sound was very loud, they have a radio intercom for a reason

    • @doogood13
      @doogood13 3 роки тому +13

      @Julian Bolt I flew in the Lancaster out of Hamilton Ontario a few years ago. Four engines obviously but it was deafening. Mandatory hearing protection.

    • @Meowface.
      @Meowface. 3 роки тому +9

      Even in a single engine Cessna its gdamn loud
      Youd have to yell to be heard at all

    • @vk2ig
      @vk2ig 3 роки тому

      @@Meowface. Absolutely correct. I flew in "lighties" only a few times (I used to maintain large turboprop and jet engine aircraft), and every time I needed to be wearing a headset so I could hear what the pilot was saying.

    • @intechio9013
      @intechio9013 3 роки тому

      @@doogood13 cap

  • @michaelmcquate8719
    @michaelmcquate8719 Рік тому +3

    I used to go to school with some WW2 vets (as teachers... aviation mechanics school), one time one of them was telling me about how the B-17's would come back from a mission and they would wash out the blood from the belly gunners pod with a hose, put in new windshields, and send them up again the next day with a new crew. Brutal.

  • @rogerdavis5053
    @rogerdavis5053 Рік тому +32

    This happened to my late good friend who was a Lancaster bomber pilot. He was shot up and a piece of shrapnel severed the main hydraulic line in the cockpit spraying hydraulic fluid around under pressure. Once it was under control he had no flaps or brakes, but the crew were able to pump the undercarriage down and eventually landed safely using every last inch of the runway from touch down to stopping. The aircraft was patched up and flying again within days.

  • @sebastian.p8132
    @sebastian.p8132 2 роки тому +54

    Wylie who directed Memphis bell the original one went up in a fortress and lost his hearing from just how loud the plane it's self was.

  • @drluch1522
    @drluch1522 9 місяців тому +3

    My Dad flew on one of the fucking things. Can't imagine the terror they experienced.

    • @drluch1522
      @drluch1522 9 місяців тому +1

      Mine too.

    • @drluch1522
      @drluch1522 7 місяців тому +1

      Blessings to you. Have a great life they gave us.

  • @nicholaswilson2761
    @nicholaswilson2761 12 днів тому

    This kind of combat is exactly what I expected from Masters of the Air. Despite the quality of the rest of this movie, this scene is done very well.

  • @littlemimus
    @littlemimus 2 роки тому +91

    My grandpa was a bombadier in a b-24 liberator during ww2. I remember being 7 or 8 and him telling me about how surreal it was to look through the bombadier sights and deliver a payload.

    • @theshadow5800
      @theshadow5800 2 роки тому +6

      So was my dad; it screwed him up for the rest of his life as he realized the part he played bringing hell on earth to who knows who. This B-24 bombing was so random and inaccurate…terrorism from the skies.

    • @d.o.g573
      @d.o.g573 Рік тому

      I bet the civilians thought the same when they looked up

  • @Akiss
    @Akiss 3 роки тому +354

    Lack of historical accuracy is not only distracting, it also detracts from the suspence. Shooting down four Zeroes? That's one shy of being an ace in a single sortie, does the exact opposite of giving a sense of defending against hopeless odds. Bizarre that the Zeroes wouldn't drop tanks before engaging. Before any "blah blah it's a movie" defenses come up, older movies have far more believable portrayals than this.
    The bomb bay walkway in real life is even more narrow and frightening, he wouldn't have space to squat down like that without his legs hanging over the edge. Even standing there's barely enough width.

    • @jb76489
      @jb76489 3 роки тому +70

      This is a movie

    • @Ion610
      @Ion610 3 роки тому +51

      @@jb76489 YEs it is. But if it claims to be Based on a true story and Historic well then It should be accurate. Otherwise they are just doing a disservice.

    • @joro5748
      @joro5748 3 роки тому +16

      Why don't they realize the scene would be much stronger (and realistic) if the defensive fire wasn't so successful?

    • @jb76489
      @jb76489 3 роки тому +12

      @@Ion610 what do you think this movie is about? Cause it’s not air to air combat

    • @thomaswilkinson3241
      @thomaswilkinson3241 3 роки тому +5

      @@Ion610 Modern Hollywood does seem to not care about wether it is accurate or not. There are not many witnesses around anymore. So it seems they argument.

  • @BlazeTheGamer1
    @BlazeTheGamer1 Рік тому +9

    Flak must be one of the most terrifying experiences in an aircraft. Its like winning the lottery except you die if you win.

  • @abravenewworld9300
    @abravenewworld9300 20 днів тому

    Some people say that when an actor's performance leaves the viewer irritated, it is because the actor is good. So Mr. Ishihara(Miyavi) is an excellent actor!

  • @jeffclark5268
    @jeffclark5268 2 роки тому +4

    Wow….flak going off a few feet from the wind shield yet no damage at all. That’s one magic airplane.

  • @Kalabenos
    @Kalabenos Рік тому +10

    2:44 I love how the pilot urges Sam to drop the bombs as if he could just pick any given moment to do it.

  • @josiahricafrente585
    @josiahricafrente585 2 роки тому +74

    Interesting how two bad guy leaders are the pilots in this plane. You got General Hux as the pilot, and Eric from Divergent as the copilot.

  • @mattklein5498
    @mattklein5498 3 роки тому +1

    Read the book. Zamporini deserves this attention. If Jolie directed this its a different turn for her. She is fantastic in everything she does. Wouldnt want to marry her but, gotta give her big thumbs up for making this choice.

  • @bonniekeough244
    @bonniekeough244 3 роки тому +37

    Scariest environment imaginable, that's all you had to say.... Scariest environment imaginable.

    • @pacificfederationpeacekeep999
      @pacificfederationpeacekeep999 3 роки тому

      Believe me ma'am... Even while playing in war tbunder as a Bomber in realistic battles... Still... you can feel the tension

    • @ZEZERBING
      @ZEZERBING 3 роки тому +4

      Can't imagine. Being there or on an asteroid.

    • @michaeldowson6988
      @michaeldowson6988 3 роки тому

      Flying in a glorified tin can.

    • @vk2ig
      @vk2ig 3 роки тому +3

      @@michaeldowson6988 An aluminium can in this case ...

    • @Ion610
      @Ion610 3 роки тому +1

      Id argue being on a Uboat during a depth Charge attack is worse but this is close second.

  • @PhoenixA380
    @PhoenixA380 2 роки тому +1

    From 06:50 we have a typical EASA ATPL Exam question.

  • @TheSpecter4567
    @TheSpecter4567 2 роки тому +216

    I actually got to fly in a B-17 and I have to say it’s awfully quiet in the plane.

    • @ExcavationNation
      @ExcavationNation 2 роки тому +8

      Dang you paid for that at the air show? 💰 💰

    • @gregoryhoover2388
      @gregoryhoover2388 2 роки тому +13

      @@ExcavationNation Probably well worth it.

    • @jmstowe
      @jmstowe 2 роки тому +24

      yes, it is really quiet especially with the Bomb Bay door open.

    • @TheSpecter4567
      @TheSpecter4567 2 роки тому +21

      @Jaime Laoshi we actually got to move about the bomber and most terrifying thing was that the thin metal plank in the bomb bay would shift a bit when there was a little turbulence.

    • @Электроника-25
      @Электроника-25 2 роки тому +4

      Причём здесь В-17 ? Это вообще В-24.

  • @joewhitehead3
    @joewhitehead3 Рік тому +3

    That opening shot is majestic

  • @alexanderk7776
    @alexanderk7776 2 роки тому +26

    External fuel Tanks were dropped in an attack. Second thing is the Hollywood kill rate of this Crew. Third is the jammed bomb bay doors is a common thing in the main character plane

  • @caffplays
    @caffplays 4 місяці тому +1

    1:58 - You can see an airplane taking off on that airfield, amazing attention to detail.

  • @andrebrandao3638
    @andrebrandao3638 3 роки тому +4

    Love how he continually turns the yoke to the left @3:18 as if it were a car

    • @nightdrv
      @nightdrv 2 роки тому

      I noticed that too 😆

  • @ВикторСухофруктов
    @ВикторСухофруктов 3 роки тому +65

    after the loss of the Starkiller base, General Hux was demoted to the pilot of a bomber

    • @G2KuKa
      @G2KuKa 3 роки тому +5

      Even general hux got kick from far far away too world war 2

    • @georgeofhamilton
      @georgeofhamilton 3 роки тому +9

      At least it’s a better bomber than the ones the Resistance has.

  • @Teefs143
    @Teefs143 7 місяців тому +3

    This has better CGI than masters of the air and this was released 10yrs ago!

    • @drewsXR650L
      @drewsXR650L 7 місяців тому +2

      Absolutely this is 10/10 for CGI and identical to ww2 flight sims physics wise. I had such huge expectations for MOA, this 10 yr old movie and Memphis bell is 10x more convincing.. MOA needs to knock it off with the lame battle music, totally kills the realism..

  • @westernmialumni5428
    @westernmialumni5428 3 роки тому +46

    Germans preferred to go after liberators. They aimed for the wing-root, it was much narrower than the B17.

  • @畠山司-u3c
    @畠山司-u3c 3 роки тому +30

    零戦が増槽を着けたまま空中戦をしている描写がありますが、本来なら空戦が始まる直前に切り離します。弾が当たってしまうと爆発してしまうので。ストーリーも色々残念なB級映画でした。

    • @Aarav_x10
      @Aarav_x10 3 роки тому

      Tora tora

    • @osamabinladen824
      @osamabinladen824 3 роки тому +3

      Are you a Japanese Zero pilot? 😅

    • @mrunaltondre6051
      @mrunaltondre6051 3 роки тому +3

      @@osamabinladen824 every pilot of a fighter is instructed to do that even today to increase maneuverability

  • @Nurhaal
    @Nurhaal 3 роки тому +146

    I love how everyone here is bitching about the B-24 having no hydraulics when the film is actually 100% accurate with what the Co-pilot claims.
    B-24 D models, the most mass produced variant and most widely used in the theatre, DOES USE HYDRAULICS, And it specifically uses HUDRAULICS for FLAPS and BRAKES. All you ninnies complaining otherwise need to go read the damned manual.

    • @lambertlum1087
      @lambertlum1087 3 роки тому +3

      Is that a B-24? I only saw two engines on that bomber. I think you meant B-25 which is a medium bomber, unlike the B-24 which is a 4-engine heavy bomber

    • @lambertlum1087
      @lambertlum1087 3 роки тому +2

      Nevermind, they switched from a view of 2-engine bomber to a 4-engine bomber. Too confusing.

    • @VercilJuan
      @VercilJuan 3 роки тому +10

      @@lambertlum1087 Watch the vid bro, its a 4 engine bomber

    • @lambertlum1087
      @lambertlum1087 3 роки тому +4

      @@VercilJuan Yes, I know it's a 4 engine bomber. The editing is very confusing. They show an outer shot of a 2 engine bomber, and then they show a shot from within the 4-engine bomber. I added a 2nd reply acknowledging that it is a 4-engine bomber.

    • @bobmarley1686
      @bobmarley1686 3 роки тому

      LMFAO the Only thing Realistic was the Zeros.

  • @lostintechnicolor
    @lostintechnicolor Рік тому +11

    The acting in this scene is so weird. Most of the characters seem awfully relaxed and unperturbed by what’s going on. Like they all took a Xanax before the bombing run.

    • @Ccccccccccsssssssssss
      @Ccccccccccsssssssssss Рік тому +2

      my thoughts exactly

    • @Headbangerr-en2cc
      @Headbangerr-en2cc Рік тому +10

      Have you ever been in situation like this? Some people, while deadly scared, just stay quiet. Other try to make jokes. One or two keep panicking. Everyone has his own way to process fear, trauma and tension. Plus their survival depends on staying focus.

    • @74nova36
      @74nova36 Рік тому

      @@Headbangerr-en2ccif this is the case and everyone acts differently, then why are these people uniformly calm and almost drugged. Lol

    • @lostintechnicolor
      @lostintechnicolor Рік тому +1

      @@Headbangerr-en2cc Come on. This is a film, not a depiction of real life. This is a failure on the director to get compelling performances from the actors. I have no doubt that there were veterans in these kinds of situations who were detached, but this whole scene feels off and weird. Even the line when the pilot just says “We are here.” What? Even I know that’s not something a pilot and captain of a bomber would say when arriving at their bombing run.

    • @stevensonsteven5965
      @stevensonsteven5965 Рік тому +1

      ​@@lostintechnicolor no, their performances were accurate. My grandfather was a ball turret gunner on a b24, and yeah, it was scary, but all those people on the bombers knew that when their time came it came. There's no time to be scared in war

  • @Pad13
    @Pad13 6 місяців тому

    Walking along that plank with the flak and any turbulence must be terrifying. Just watching it gave me the willies. I think I’d have my shute on at all times.

  • @phatpat6667
    @phatpat6667 3 роки тому +34

    quietly talking to each other inside a bomber??? sure

    • @Holret
      @Holret 3 роки тому +1

      They got throat mics but the main actor is not even wearing the headset to hear others. The Pilot and Co-pilot have one ear uncovered which would have deafened that ear and not helped hear one another. Also, it would have been crazy cold for fingers/ears/nose, which aree the first to get frostbite. Bombers of this era were not pressurized and had no climate control. Alot of non-sense going on.

  • @billyponsonby
    @billyponsonby 2 роки тому +10

    Air gunnery on these bombers was so very ineffective that the USAAF seriously considered not having these extra lives onboard. Unlike in the movies of course.

    • @neilgulati7918
      @neilgulati7918 2 роки тому +5

      I've heard that the penalty in manoeuvrability that was suffered because of the gunner projections cost them more casualties than was saved by the guns. I was told it was a morale saving device, so the crew could feel like they were fighting back. Which stinks.

    • @JohnSmith-mk1rj
      @JohnSmith-mk1rj 2 роки тому

      I think having guns gives the crew a bit more confidence than not having them, but I believe the domes on top and bottom were removed eventually, in order to manufacture planes quicker and get them into service.
      Those domes were very complicated to make and assemble, and the extra speed gained from removing them was deemed more important than having the guns.

    • @kakmaster6945
      @kakmaster6945 2 роки тому +1

      Well, after having spoken to my great grandfather and having read his memoirs, him and his crew shot down 2 different aircraft and damaged another throughout the war. He flew in the Hamden medium bomber as a gunner and he recounts hving shot one down with a combined affort between him and the other gunner aboard. The second time was all him, shooting down an me-110 which is a sizeable fighter aircraft and also damaging another me-110 on another occasion. He recalls it was on fire when it disengaged so I'd wager it probably didn't make it back either. So in total that is 3 aircraft down/damaged from a total of 36 missions. Some in the Hamden and some in the Sunderland. Not too bad tbh.

    • @scottydog1313
      @scottydog1313 Рік тому

      @@JohnSmith-mk1rj They're called turrets and they werent removed from bombers. US manufacturing capabilities had no problems making them, or making enough of them.

    • @slome815
      @slome815 Рік тому +3

      @@kakmaster6945 Statistics tell a different story though. One where bombers really didn't shoot down many fighters. Now, it's certainly possible your great grandfather's plane was an outlier in the statistics and did indeed shot down 3 aircraft (after all statistics are about averages). But then again, all sides were overclaiming immensely too. So even first hands accounts aren't all that reliable of a source. I know it comes across as immensly disrespectfull to veterans.
      But really, to give you an example, between june 1941 and december 1941 the RAF claimed 711 luftwaffe fighters shot down. The germans lost 103 fighters in that period. Those are probably almost all claims by pilots/gunners who are convinced they shot down a plane, not people deliberatly lying.

  • @markbrandon7359
    @markbrandon7359 2 роки тому +7

    I built a scale model of a B-24 once. That makes me an expert. The B-17 didn't have the range nor the bombload the B-24 did for the B-17 to make it to Berlin they had to give up half the Bomb load and replace it with fuel so it carried 4 1,000 LB bombs the corsair could carry 3,000 LB's with one engine usually 2 bombs and rockets

    • @dwhughes1975
      @dwhughes1975 2 роки тому

      Having replied to a guy on UA-cam who built a scale model of a B-24, I am now omniscient and entitled to freak out if contradicted.

  • @kerbalairforce8802
    @kerbalairforce8802 Рік тому +2

    Movies never get right just how loud it is in these planes.

  • @Jerry_Fried
    @Jerry_Fried 3 роки тому +24

    That movie should have been about Phil. He went through everything Louie went through, plus he saved their lives twice.

  • @jinks908
    @jinks908 Рік тому +1

    The really sobering part of all this is that most of these guys were kids man. Just 18-20 year old kids. I was still sneaking beer past my parents at that age.

  • @jar8808
    @jar8808 Рік тому +13

    my friends grandfather was a bomber crew, in the ball turret.
    i heard that its very uncomfortable and kinda dangerous.
    he only saw action once and his entire crew survived the war which is cool.
    they were all friends until they all eventually passed away. i believe there's 1 more person left that's alive today but idk their name I just know they are still alive.

    • @Biiggles
      @Biiggles Рік тому +1

      "Kinda dangerous". It's to be said that the ball turret gunner was the most dangerous job during the entire war. You were pretty much strapped into a highligthed ball in an very uncomfortable position. You were an easy target, and had no way to escape the ball during flight. A sitting duck. Mustve been so scary..

  • @randomentertainingvideos3545
    @randomentertainingvideos3545 2 роки тому +33

    I've heard that the belly gunner is in a very comfortable position in his little glass bubble, he doesn't have to stand up.

    • @screenname8267
      @screenname8267 2 роки тому

      If you're into SM, maybe.
      My grandfather hated it -for many reasons, not the least of which was that the ball turret was the primary target for a fighter going after a B-24: low armor, high exposure, and knocking them out gives you the whole belly with nothing to shoot back.

    • @randomentertainingvideos3545
      @randomentertainingvideos3545 2 роки тому +4

      @@screenname8267 I meant sitting wise, but yes I've heard it was also very dangerous.

    • @screenname8267
      @screenname8267 2 роки тому

      @@randomentertainingvideos3545 So did I -that was the SM comment.

    • @randomentertainingvideos3545
      @randomentertainingvideos3545 2 роки тому

      @@screenname8267 SM?

    • @screenname8267
      @screenname8267 2 роки тому

      @@randomentertainingvideos3545 You know.. people into bondage

  • @TheMuro22
    @TheMuro22 3 роки тому +164

    Well, those guys almost had an ace in one flight...

  • @vascovalente3929
    @vascovalente3929 Рік тому

    What great acting , no stress in their voices, no swearing…really razzy nominations material 😂😂😂

    • @HurricaneDPG
      @HurricaneDPG 7 місяців тому

      How many missions have you flown on? Enough said.

  • @galesams4205
    @galesams4205 3 роки тому +17

    i liked fireing the M2 browning 50 cal and the 90mm even better. 4th inf. div. 10 armored cavlery, FB oasis, Mederith, FB black hawk. pleiku.

    • @Электроника-25
      @Электроника-25 2 роки тому

      Херня этот ваш Браунинг 12,7. Пулемёт Березина (УБ) гораздо круче.

  • @zacharymaneja1207
    @zacharymaneja1207 Рік тому

    It's amazing how confident everyone is

  • @kepler186f4
    @kepler186f4 2 роки тому +9

    Incredible, one battered B-24 takes out half of the Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service.

  • @Ally.Cat.252
    @Ally.Cat.252 7 місяців тому +1

    3:30 love how he says “uh oh”

  • @workonesabs
    @workonesabs 2 роки тому +7

    I saw this film. Crazy even with starvation and abuse the human body can survive. 47 days with literally no food and water.

  • @aldoesposito8195
    @aldoesposito8195 2 роки тому +7

    My father was a 20 yo waist gunner in this exact aircraft in Europe during WW2

    • @daveb.4268
      @daveb.4268 2 роки тому

      That's rather rare, most B-24's went to the Pacific.

    • @aldoesposito8195
      @aldoesposito8195 2 роки тому

      @@daveb.4268 I'm not sure that's accurate. While the Eighth Air Force's B-17 garnered much acclaim flying from England, the Fifteenth Air Force (my dad's unit) was based in North Africa & Italy & used only b-24s.

    • @daveb.4268
      @daveb.4268 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah, your right. I always seem to forget their service in Africa and Italy. Apologies as your fathers service was no less vital or perilous as the European bombers.😔

    • @aldoesposito8195
      @aldoesposito8195 2 роки тому

      @@daveb.4268 No worries & thanks for your sentiments :)

  • @andrewmontgomery5621
    @andrewmontgomery5621 3 роки тому +17

    The bomber pilot is played by the one who played General Hux of the First Order in the new Star Wars.

    • @spencerwest9981
      @spencerwest9981 3 роки тому +1

      ReAlLy

    • @krashd
      @krashd 3 роки тому

      Also known as Domhnall Gleeson, Brendan Gleeson's son.

  • @jmccallion2394
    @jmccallion2394 Рік тому

    When Lou complains about flak, that is actually what they were meant to do, but the bomb aimer of target; to shot one down was a bonus!

  • @Жизньживотныхилюдей

    Спасибо, парни, за нашу общую Победу над фашизмом!

  • @colinmiles1052
    @colinmiles1052 2 роки тому +2

    Not seen this before - will keep watching.

  • @be1410all
    @be1410all 2 роки тому +10

    May we never forget and may we all make efforts not to allow to be repeated the tragedies of war.

    • @chomper4x4
      @chomper4x4 2 роки тому

      We currently at war with China, and Russia by proxy.

    • @neilgulati7918
      @neilgulati7918 2 роки тому

      "We"? Do you know who started the war?

    • @roybean5082
      @roybean5082 Рік тому

      @@neilgulati7918 Unnecessary

  • @Imnotyourdoormat
    @Imnotyourdoormat Рік тому +2

    Although good, the CG cockpit porportions are way off on the side-to-side width. B-24 pilots sat much closer than shown. They literally rubbed shoulders with each other. German fighter pilots often favored a head-on frontal attack aimed at the cockpit with both pilots grouped so closely together...

  • @GuitarMan22
    @GuitarMan22 3 роки тому +65

    4 kills with one liberator, with turret and side guns. hollywood shootout fun. Star Wars with piston engines

    • @baltazargabka_
      @baltazargabka_ 3 роки тому +3

      Nowadays movie makers take us as idiots. Movies from 1960s have best aerial combat scenes. That's sad.

    • @navblue20
      @navblue20 3 роки тому +4

      For all the two of you know there may have been bomber gunners who got that many in one day.
      Matter of fact there was an Air Force gunner in World War II that shot down and left them his name was Michael Arooth.
      Look him up and get back to me since you know so much about history

    • @horacio7465
      @horacio7465 3 роки тому +5

      @@navblue20 one freaking case cannot be used to generalize. To have one bombers shooting down FOUR fighters is plain stupid. Anyone can tell you that.

    • @Ponen77
      @Ponen77 2 роки тому

      @@navblue20 Interesting .....I have sometimes wondered what were the tallies of air kills of Individual bombers were, then it turns out that this is an area that's often ignored, so did some digging and its actually very fascinating, due to the fact that during a fighter attack so many guns can be firing at the same targets its difficult to know who got the kill and the brass wanted the crew to think themselves as a team and hence discouraged keeping tallies. None the less there are pilots who kept individual tallies and there are many sites that cover this, one name that popped up in quite a few lists was Staff Sergeant Benjamin Franklin Warmer a B-17 waist gunner. He was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross for a bombing mission on July 5, 1943, where he shot down 7 German fighters, he went on to later down 2 more enemy fighters to finish the war with 9 kills.

    • @stopdeletingmyaccount125
      @stopdeletingmyaccount125 2 роки тому

      Not unrealistic but not frequent either

  • @sisimon311
    @sisimon311 2 роки тому +8

    Lol when the bombardier looks through the bomb aim point and in the back groun you se lots of enemy zeros take off.

  • @rh392
    @rh392 Рік тому +77

    Full of tragic mistakes. Above all, with the bomb bay door is stack open it must have been brutally windy in the airplane, it was pretty much calm in the film though.

    • @TheMinipily
      @TheMinipily Рік тому +8

      True but I'm not sure the average movie goer would like to have their ears bleed whilst trying to listen to what the crew are saying.

    • @rh392
      @rh392 Рік тому +1

      @@TheMinipily Right. I agree.

    • @tescheurich
      @tescheurich Рік тому +1

      "tragic"?

    • @nogoodnameleft
      @nogoodnameleft Рік тому

      Yeah...this is forgivable for dramatic reasons. What is not forgivable is Hollywood not bothering to make a proper and well-done B-24 movie until "Unbroken". Hollywood has made 100+ movies or TV shows about the B-17s in combat and zero B-24 in combat movies until "Unbroken". There was one single movie made in the 1960s or 1970s that was about the doomed lost B-24 that crash-landed by itself in a Libyan desert, killing all the men due to deyhdration, but that had nothing to do with a movie about a B-24 in actual combat.

    • @alpha51omega38
      @alpha51omega38 Рік тому +2

      if the lower ball turret stays down, plus the drag from those open bomb bay doors, they should have plenty of brakes, friction and hopefully no fire when they land.

  • @mandelorean6243
    @mandelorean6243 2 роки тому

    Reminds me of the story of coast guard pilot in ww2 when German uboat shelling the new Orleans shore.. He was only one to arrive in time:
    Bomb didn't drop, gets out, kicks it.. Doesn't work, makes another pass, throws his toolbox and everything heavy he could find...
    Wish it was on camera

  • @jehoiakimelidoronila5450
    @jehoiakimelidoronila5450 3 роки тому +16

    That camera panning at dawn then eventually revealing the planes... First I count three. Then four. Then there's a lot of 'em.

    • @ArsonFire00
      @ArsonFire00 3 роки тому

      Do you always have to mention what you've just seen?
      Believe it or not, the 755,331 views it's gotten means we've all just seen the same fucking thing.
      Mong.

  • @GuangkaZ
    @GuangkaZ 3 роки тому +45

    With the bomb bay stuck open and all these holes, the air in the cabin seems completely undisturbed.

    • @osamabinladen824
      @osamabinladen824 3 роки тому

      What

    • @chemist9895
      @chemist9895 2 роки тому +2

      the air in the cabin is the same pressure as the outside air due to the waist gunners and the tail gunners.

    • @AtlantaTerry
      @AtlantaTerry 2 роки тому +3

      @@chemist9895 no, you don't understand. The posting had to do with air turbulence in the crew areas, not air pressure.

  • @kubrick1969
    @kubrick1969 3 роки тому +54

    4 zeros in one mission one single liberator???

    • @intechio9013
      @intechio9013 3 роки тому +5

      the rest of the bombers veered off, this particular one didnt because he literally says in the video they have no hydraulics, some zeros probably picked up on this and picked on them

    • @LAG09
      @LAG09 3 роки тому +8

      The zero was a good 1-on-1 dogfighter and almost entirely designed for it. But against bombers that are much more heavily built than a fighter and shoot back at you as you're shooting at it, the extremely light construction made it so that the bombers were almost better at shooting down zeroes than the zeroes shooting at them.

    • @mappy-5934
      @mappy-5934 3 роки тому +13

      @@LAG09 people who only play war thunder be like

    • @WalrusWinking
      @WalrusWinking 3 роки тому +1

      @Necramonium Based on a book that's a true story.

    • @alastair9446
      @alastair9446 3 роки тому

      @@LAG09 It was only good 1-on-1 at the start of the war till the allies developed better tactics and planes. Then we talking 16:1 kill ratios.

  • @bill2066
    @bill2066 9 місяців тому

    I gotta hand it to Jolie. Didnt think she could pull off a believable war movie. But, she did. The Air Scenes? STILL looks like a Cartoon to me.

  • @НаильКужин-д7э
    @НаильКужин-д7э 2 роки тому +5

    съёмки просто шикарные! слов нет..

  • @jacobcorcho2518
    @jacobcorcho2518 7 місяців тому +1

    People seem to forget this movie budget CGI, for just a couple hours. Masters of the Air is goddamn streaming service CGI for 9 hours of content. It makes sense why the CGI in the show is less impressive. Stop whining

    • @georgesmith1127
      @georgesmith1127 7 місяців тому

      yeah but this was released 10 years ago on a budget of 65mil, just wondering how a show after 10 years of advancement and a budget of 250mil can look worse then some videogames today

    • @jordnchn7907
      @jordnchn7907 7 місяців тому +1

      @@georgesmith1127 uh i mean the scene is only 7mins long in one movie/episode there was only 2 air scenes in the whole movie.
      now with masters of the air, there are like 2 or more air battle scenes all at least 20mins long PER episode so thats 20 air battle scenes for the whole series thats like x10 CGI and work, so ofc the CGI artists cant just focus all their time on one battle they have to spread it unlike in unbroken. Even for the film RED TAILS there are already more air battle scenes in Masters of the Air than there were for the whole movie of RED TAILS and lucasfilm did that movie who have great CGI artists working for them!
      TLDR there are more battle scenes in masters of the air therefore CGI quality is ALOT worse than unbroken

  • @cad5238
    @cad5238 2 роки тому +8

    Memphis Belle was a well made movie! Based on a true aircraft and events.I really enjoyed the flight crew fussing with each other.But it sure was a great movie. I agree about engine noise it does damage hearing.With any powerplant.turbojet,piston, turbine ,Diesel,.im living proof.Should have kept my hearing protection on at all times .Flew a lot of times for years on helicopters, they also make. Your mind wander a bit! Even with modern insulation.

    • @stormywindmill
      @stormywindmill 2 роки тому +2

      It always amuses me ( having done a few trips in C47s) how people flying in similar aircraft in WW2 films are able to hold quietly spoken conversations, When in reality it is so noisy its down to sign language

    • @cheobe
      @cheobe 2 роки тому +2

      Ah that movie 8/10 for me

  • @Drrayoldman
    @Drrayoldman Рік тому

    "Pilot to bombardier" ...ONLY in the movies. The crew knew each other's name's. Most likely. "Bob it's all yours, do your thing"..."Ok Bob, I've got the stick. Now I'm gonna give em a lil sompin sompin"!

  • @SeattlePogo
    @SeattlePogo 2 роки тому +3

    For what it's worth, my 99 year old dad flew B-26's. received a DFC, and was shot down over Germany Nov. 18, 1944. The crew got out, and all were taken prisoner of war. They ended up at Stalag Luft 1, in Barth until May of 1945. He went on to fly in Korea and Viet Nam. He hates war, hates talking about most of it.

  • @danny_dandan
    @danny_dandan Рік тому

    its sad that young littles boys had to go through this tragedy they were screaming in pain like kids 😕

  • @Fibonaccisghost
    @Fibonaccisghost 2 роки тому +13

    It was easy to get to the target, but far more difficult flying home after dropping the payload.

  • @ekingunay
    @ekingunay 2 роки тому +1

    These were the golden generation.

  • @robleary3353
    @robleary3353 2 роки тому +6

    They were all Heroes!. Every Allied aircrew member who climbed into an aircraft and those who serviced them to partake in that war and those who followed!. RESPECT!.

    • @reynaldoflores4522
      @reynaldoflores4522 2 роки тому

      They were war criminals. They killed innocent civilians.

    • @robleary3353
      @robleary3353 2 роки тому

      @@reynaldoflores4522Those in glass houses shouldn't throw stones!. The thousands killed by air in the Germans invasion roll through Europe?. The Germans then started bombing London durring the Battle of Britain, then when that failed they went onto the night offensive the Blitz on most major UK cities killing thousands of civillians. It's called War and was 'tit for tat!'.

  • @heathwoodlee520
    @heathwoodlee520 2 роки тому +2

    This is why Veteran’s Day and Memorial Day are very important in America.

  • @brad9336
    @brad9336 7 місяців тому +13

    Better CGI than Masters of the Air!

  • @buster882
    @buster882 Рік тому

    For people who didn’t read the book. Harry Brooks didn’t make it home. He died a week before his 23rd birthday and his mother and fiancé wouldn’t hear about his death until a week later. 9 days after he planned to marry Jeannette Burtscher.

    • @joewhitehead3
      @joewhitehead3 Рік тому

      The freaking war taking away so much from a lot of people

  • @darthdoggie0031
    @darthdoggie0031 3 роки тому +23

    My question is where did all the bombers go when the zeros appeared.

    • @timteow5779
      @timteow5779 2 роки тому +13

      They turned on active camo and jet engines came out of their propellers and flew into higher altitude

    • @lunabobles4526
      @lunabobles4526 2 роки тому

      You can see some

    • @darthdoggie0031
      @darthdoggie0031 2 роки тому

      @@lunabobles4526 I looked for a while can't see any

    • @lunabobles4526
      @lunabobles4526 2 роки тому

      @@darthdoggie0031 You can see some at 4:46 and 5:24

    • @darthdoggie0031
      @darthdoggie0031 2 роки тому

      @@lunabobles4526 yep I see "a few" at 5:24 but nothing else.

  • @kokutai3331
    @kokutai3331 Рік тому

    Never seen this clip but I already knew the comments would be full of freedom lovers

    • @bill2066
      @bill2066 9 місяців тому

      Freedom Lovers? Freedom from Sin?

  • @tankacebo9128
    @tankacebo9128 3 роки тому +21

    no B-24 had a tail gun position with a single M2. they had twin M2s in a power turret for the vast majority of production, and a handful had a field modification of a hand-aimed pair of M2s. the theater conversion of non-combat capable airframes to the C-24 standard did have this rear turret with a single M2, but those had the ball turret, dorsal turret, waist guns, and all nose guns save for the single M1919 in the nose removed- they weren't combat aircraft, they were transport planes.

    • @osamabinladen824
      @osamabinladen824 3 роки тому

      Yes

    • @tankacebo9128
      @tankacebo9128 3 роки тому

      @@osamabinladen824 yo wtf

    • @herberthoover8379
      @herberthoover8379 2 роки тому

      Thank you! That drove me nuts!

    • @MalikCarr
      @MalikCarr 2 роки тому +2

      The CAF's B-24 "Diamond Lil" is outfitted with that single rear gun, I assume that was the aircraft used to make the sound stage model for this movie.

    • @IJNAzooma
      @IJNAzooma 7 місяців тому

      It's a movie lil bro

  • @fluidapple9091
    @fluidapple9091 Рік тому +1

    "I may be unbroken but the hydraulics sure ain't" - Louie Zamperini, probably

  • @MrTuskan
    @MrTuskan 3 роки тому +39

    No wind moving any hair. Speaking like sitting at home... So realistic! :facepalm:

    • @justicar5
      @justicar5 3 роки тому +1

      speaking like home would be, throat mikes are crazy good for that.

    • @Holret
      @Holret 3 роки тому

      @@justicar5 except them main actor doesnt have the ear piece on and later begins to talk to the pilot in a normal voice. The pilot replies and have a little chat. Its almost as if they dont know how loud it gets in there or that they need the headset on to hear one another.

    • @krashd
      @krashd 3 роки тому

      MrTuskan, the movie is assuming you are an adult and can fill in the blanks :facepalm:

    • @MrTuskan
      @MrTuskan 3 роки тому

      @@krashd filling the blanks... well - may be. But rather its just looks cheap.

  • @satyex
    @satyex Рік тому

    This scene is used to test home theatre systems. Sounds mind blowing on svs 16 subwoofer!

  • @Sanwizard1
    @Sanwizard1 2 роки тому +40

    My father was an Lt in the army air corp. Never talked about it, but I do have pics of him standing next to a lot of nose art. He had money from many countries also. I think he was part of the secret bomb sight installs.

    • @Shustrik1
      @Shustrik1 2 роки тому

      So you are the executioner's son. Your father didn't kill soldiers, he killed women, children and old people. Your bombing of Germany was pointless from a military point of view. You are a nation of true fascists. Yes, and that war was made by your country, your rotten people .. Hitler is the brainchild of the United States, like Zelensky.

  • @hatelife7447
    @hatelife7447 Рік тому +10

    I feel like you wouldnt be able to talk to the other crew members, with all the wind noise unless you had a headset

  • @CrotchRocket78
    @CrotchRocket78 2 роки тому +46

    This scenario would be a concern for any other pilots except for A10 pilots. They dont start worrying till part of a wing and tail section is missing and maybe an engine. They usually still make it home.

    • @andrygugli1928
      @andrygugli1928 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah thats insane. And think that the Su 25 has even TWICE the a 10 armor

    • @t-jh4236
      @t-jh4236 2 роки тому +2

      A-10 Warthogs are crazy. I have seen one exhibition of a dry fire up close and the humming of that gun is crazy. Throw in actual live fire and I am sure you know... very few things like it in our world.

    • @AtlantaTerry
      @AtlantaTerry 2 роки тому

      Someone needs to make a movie featuring A10 Warthogs.

  • @tonycarpaccio9550
    @tonycarpaccio9550 3 роки тому +25

    You can't even talk that quietly and be understood in an Airbus these days let alone a B24 lol

    • @CrniWuk
      @CrniWuk 3 роки тому

      It was also really cold inside those. A vetaran once told in a documentary, you would see chunks of frozen blood rolling around in the plane if people got injured or even killed because it was so cold it froze.

    • @KristianLarsson79
      @KristianLarsson79 3 роки тому

      They are wearing throat microphones