ROBBI SPEAKS! Why Did She Give The Money Back To Garrett??
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 жов 2022
- Robbi Jade Lew spoke with me on Day 2 of my Garrett vs Robbi investigation and she talked about why she decided to give the money back to Garrett Adelstein after the hand ended. This is the 2nd interview I had with Robbi with the first one coming on Day 1...
Robbi has been accused of cheating by Garrett Adelstein during a recent episode of Hustler Casino Live! The investigation has went on for days and no hard evidence has been located in the footage. We are currently waiting to hear more from Garrett and the investigation to come from Hustler Casino Live.
_____
|| ► Subscribe to My Channel Here ua-cam.com/users/subscription_c...
|| ► Twitter: http// joeingram1
|| ► Snapchat: joeingram1
|| ► Facebook: / plopodcast
|| ► Website: www.onepokerlife.com
|| ► ITunes: itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/m...
_____ - Ігри
Clip is from Day 2 Investigation : Interview #2 w/ Robbi Jade Lew....
She's such a liar!
Why did you skip over the flashing lights on her abdomen during one of the chair vibratiosn Poppi
Papi she is innocent Papi!!!! I need a live stream from you today PAPI LFG!
She gave money back cause she wants to be on stream. Insta gram follows, poker promos, Of subs. Could gaf about 100k. She’s already rich and wasn’t her money. That’s why rip was so mad. This has got ridiculous.
You see J Little's stream yesterday?
If, I ever call down 130k with a bad hand and won, I would never feel bad. And I would certainly, never give the money back.
She's on stream. She knows Garrett is the face of Hustlers Casino Poker and wants to continue playing there. He can mention he doesn't like her and they low key won't invite her back. If you think about it if you did cheat you wouldn't give the chips back and make it that obvious.
if you ever call down 130k with J high you're going to win 0% of the time. The whole reason this is a big deal.
@@frankyng4159 oh well. Play elsewhere and earn your reputation back. She’d still be better off being known as someone who made a bad call and got extremely lucky over being known as a cheater and a bad one at that by giving the money back.
You don't have money like her. Clearly she's a boss and the money isn't as much to her.
@sh0cktim3 this isn’t her money , she is being staked to play . Which makes this look even worse for her
there's a reason why lawyers don't put their clients on the stand 🙄
🤣
Well hopefully her husband keeps this in mind if they do try to sue.
That's the reason you never talk to cops. Cops want to use the line, "what do you have to hide?" Like silence or not letting them search your car is an admission of guilt. It so stupid. Like one action infers another. That's why her giving the money back doesn't mean sh*t.
@@balltillwefall8284 husband's just waiting to make sure she wasn't caught first. Then he will sue before he divorces her so he can get his piece
W
Nothing she says makes any sense...
Lol whomans
Well she is a woman
Exactly!!
And in my book that shows she didn't cheat, it's about time we get to see some proof of cheating if people still.gona say she has cheated
So what she's fkng hott. She can have the money
First she says she offers it back then says Garrett pressured her. Her stories change by the hour including misreading her hand which she has changed multiple times. It's just so obvious
It's shady for sure, especially her behavior right after the hand, but I guess it's POSSIBLE she's just nervous. I can't really accuse her of it without any evidence is the thing. Obviously calling there is crazy if you understand poker.
Without evidence you can not confuse amateur play and nervous talking with cheating? Can "anybody" prove it was cheating?
@@anthonymorris6801 Doug Polk lol
Expecting a fish on drugs to explain their thoughtprosess is a clown take by the poker world
Also you can missread your hand like that, i have done it myself, and seen worse. Staring at your hands means nothing.
Also people sayijg she wasnt suprised when she realized she missread her hand.
"Both" hands scooped the pot, you dont know when she qctually relaized what happend.
5% cheater
Also Berkwy explaining his thoughtprocess with wordsallads makes less sense to me then this.
Lmao
Yep that’s been my position the entire time. She literally says in the hand, I don’t have a 3. I have a bluff catcher. That has changed 4-5 times now. It’s a lie.
Poker community: Robbi is innocent
Robbi: Hold my beer
Kind of yeah
She's trading the beer for the shovel.
@@Katz_Pajamas haven’t been following for couple of days. What’s the latest and where we at?
@@aldrigforsent8862 Robbi Jade scandal update
↑↑↑ Copy paste that into search bar located above 😂 jkjk As far as how she was going on and on here tho, she did kind of sound like she was digging her own grave, hence my addition to your comment. But she could be intentionally wanting to sound that way, as this all may just be a huge publicity stunt, who knows? 🤷🏻♀️😄
@@Katz_Pajamas
Sorry mate, there’s just been so much content and I can’t sit through 8 hour streams to find the relevant info 🥶
I’ll paste your suggestion into the search bar. Thank you so much.
So I made a stone cold read, but I’m gonna give the money back bc I shouldn’t have won. Translation, I was cheating and I don’t want any light shed on this event.
When you are truthful, your story does not change that much...
It’s not hard to remember…the truth.
Also if you are honest then you don't talk non-stop for 5 minutes. You let them ask probing questions.
Could not disagree more: you have it backwards. When you're LYING your story doesn't change, because you will stick to the script. Her colluding partner would have told her to avoid giving any interviews, let alone tell her to go off the initial script that she thought she had j3 the entire time. But honest people misremember things all the time; it's human nature.
@@SteepDescent Great comment
@@SteepDescent your explanation assumes a lie was prepared. There is a big difference when someone prepares a lie and when they have to come up with it in the moment. The incongruous statements and changing narrative are indicative of someone scrambling to fabricate.
Literally every time she tries to explain herself she changes her story and gets increasingly flustered. If she just never said anything I would be able to believe it was just a braindead call and sometimes crazy shit happens
Why should she have to explain anything? Garrett had 17 outs didn't respect Robbi re-raise of $20k and twice lost. Then that POS took her winnings.
The more she talks the worse it gets
If you listen to her talk she obviously has adhd or something and has trouble putting her thoughts together plus very little poker knowledge. She would be the last person you picked to cheat lol
shes like biden " that you know the thing?!"
@Alex F For me this was all staged by Hustler Casino....you got Garrett who was already on a tv show.....you got Rip who is friends and works with Jake Paul who stage fights....and Nick Vertucci seems the guy who would want all this smoke for his show
If someone accused me of cheating I would go off on them, definitely wouldn’t give them their money back.
So would I, but my wife would cower down. Ppl r different dude 😊
If you was cheating you’d go off even more. Human nature to get very defensive if you’re lying and get confronted. More chance of giving the money back when you’re being honest imo and didn’t want confrontation. Also that’s not a spot you cheat in is it. She was behind
Yeah as a man of someone accused me I would laugh at them. I'm sure my girl wouldn't know how to react.
"DAMN I WISH I JUST DIDNT MAKE THAT CALL..."
said Noone ever about making a straight honest hero call they made...
Wasn't a hero call though.
She really is lying nonstop, anyone can tell
So like every poker fish ever, tryijg to pretend they are better then they are.
Got it
The reason she is lying is because she started the lie off by not acknowledging right away she misread her hand so she can’t give a rational explanation for anything else. She didn’t cheat. She just made a stupid decision to act like she called with Jack high
@Parlay i play poker , She Is lying.
Just tell me please ANOTHER SIMALAR CALL EVER PLAYED.
i wait.
When you have been caught out changing your story multiple times people will not take anything you say at face value no matter how sincere you want to be.
she has muddied the waters so she cannot expect a clear message from the people she is trying to convince I'm afraid.
actualy most bone heads are going along with her constant storey change. just like they do with msm, just with polaticiens. most people are indeed thick as fu--!
Yeah. I think you have to see it that way. Notice there's NO MORE TALK about having a 3, which is the TOTALITY of the explanation she gave in a video the very first day. Comparing to this video, one story HAS TO BE A LIE (either she thought she had a 3, or she thought she was getting bluffed and just called no matter what) -- and lying when you're accused of cheating is...uh, suspicious.
GA lied too tho so what are we gonna go with? Just be quiet my guy. Garrett lied multiple times in his tweet and backstage.
Yeah calling someone cheater without evidence makes you a good spectator. How shameful is it on Garrett to take money back without even proving the cheat?
but here's the thing. she doesn't need to give ANY explanation to you, gman, or anyone. it's her money (regardless if she is supposedly being backed.) So what she says really is irrelevant if you take what she says with a grain of salt.
What really caught Garrett was when she said she read Ace high, so she called with a Jack high. If she had the smallest pair possible, it would had made sense, but she had Jack high.
She still doesn’t talk how she misread her hand, like the details of it. She’s being dishonest.
@UCvwKPT5gWqJuCcREPPN36SA this is the most likely scenario
She was lying because it's poker. You lie when you win with a 'bad' call and avoid judging from others almost subcontiously, especially with such a big pot and garret staring like that/
If you watch the clip again she looked at her hand 3 times. Hard to believe she misread her hand 3 times then at the end of the hand says she doesn’t have a 3. The interview on the same night from hustler casino said she thought she had a 3. Fishy to me.
I wonder why she would be dishonest? Makes you wonder huh?
So she mistook a 4 of hearts for a 3 of diamonds? 3 of hearts was on the board. Why lie if it was just a donk call?
why tell the truth? is this not poker anymore? a pro gets owned. cry me an ocean.
@@robertbronson1639 so owned that she gave the money back.
Gerret cornerd her in a corner and "asked" for the money back.
She also had j3 the hand before, and thats not on any board anywhere.
She is a liar not a cheater.
Why the hell didn't Joey ask her how that is possible when it's obvious in the video she looked at her hand for multiple seconds before making the call!?
easy answer
The more Rob talks the more guilty he sounds
Rob. He?
Big time, she just said she was standing to lose so much money in the pot but he bet $10,000 and she would have lost minimal at that stage. Then the raise, ahh it happens but you fold and get onto the next one. It was detrimental to her stack. It’s just insane.
@@thaarbitor2003 who knows now adays 😂
@@johnkirby939 lol
Thats the most damning thing. Like murder suspects who talk and talk their way into being arrested and charged. Theres some videos about how guilty suspects tend to keep rambling on trying to convince detectives of their innocence and end up talking themselves into being charged. If she just never said anything other than she thought she had J3 or she put Gman on his exact hand and never gave the money back this wouldnt still be discussed.
shes literally lying, still claiming she thought she had a 3 yet before she calls the all in she says no 3
Watch the clip again, someone says "do you have pocket 3" and she says "no." Then someone else says "you've got a 3 in your hand", but the 2nd "no" could have been her just repeating the answer to the first question. And everyone has mics on, just because we heard the 2nd question doesn't mean she did, it could have been someone across the table.
You have to think this chick is on her 3rd stream ever with thousands of people watching, in a hand against the cash game end boss, with the GOAT Phil Ivey watching a few feet away. Have you played live poker? Do you have any idea how much shit is running through your head in spots like this? Way too much to be hearing every single thing everyone at the table is saying. And she had taken Xanax, which makes your short term memory worthless and isn't much different from being drunk.
@@timelapsega whats the excuse for the clear “bluff catcher” hand she said she had when she had nothing
@@timelapsega or the “i thought you had ace high” comment but calls with jack high. clearly makes absolutely no sense on a legit level
Her story changes more often than I change my underwear...granted I don't change them very often but she's still definitely a cheater
but why pick that spot to risk cheating?. if she could somehow see the cards why would she call HIS allin when she as best 50/50 to win?.
As for her constantly changig story?, she is doing a mikki and trying to sound like she knows what she is talking about and I would guess that she wouldnt even be able to remember what she had said.
And she was correct in her read on Garret having nothing.
Plus no one has put forward a convincing theory of how she pulled off this cheat and no one has shown any other suspicious hands.
Watched this video that showed a similar hand from S Unger where he called an allin to win a tournament and no one called him a cheater.
🤣
Just turn them inside out. Can use a pair twice as long that way.
@@aristideau5072 I think She's getting a signal from someone who works with the stream and all she knows if she is good or not..She's not Mike Postle who could see all the cards of course. But let's see how the story goes
@@aristideau5072 because she thought gman just calls turn , when he shoved she was like fuck 20k gone and made a greedy call what exposed her
I dont think she cheated but listening to this person talk about poker is fucking brutal
Lol - that’s the best comment I’ve heard yet:))
The "I figured I would win it back, I don't know why Garrett is mad because he'd just win it back" is so funny.
“I felt bad that I won a hand that I shouldn’t have won”. How in the world does that make any sense? You called and won. If you were going to feel bad for winning the hand and give the money back then don’t call in the first place. And more importantly, don’t play poker for large amounts of money.
if I was not cheating, and I never offer give away my money. hell no
@@sangvan3323 irregardless cheat or no, she shouldn’t return money. The best action is to let casino hold the money, and investigate. If no cheat or inclusive, she can keep the money
Ive been embarrassed to win a hand and have actually given some of the pot back. It happens. I went all in preflop with 22 with a bulky stack and got dnap called with AA. Long story short is opponent caught an ace on the river that gave me a gutshot straight. I actually felt bad showing my hand and gave about 10pct back.
@@ronaldbarnes1746 You do you, I’m *never* giving back that pot if I ran it twice for a chop & he lost both flips. That’s poker & he can suck it up and pay without whining.
She wasn’t cheating. She gave it back because Garrett started crying. If he didn’t she wouldn’t of given it back. You have no clue what you are talking about
For a woman that makes such ballsy calls, you would think she’d have that same ballsy judgement to keep the money. Giving it back looks suspicious, even if she didn’t cheat.
Obvious big cheating in live streams
Thanks Joey!
When every word that comes out of your mouth is a lie, you pass lie detector tests by default. Hilarious though. Thanks for the laughs.
I made a ballsy read and a ballsy move, and when Garrett says this clip is going be to be viewed millions of times, I felt bad that I won a hand that I should not have won.
Not very believeable is it lol?
That shows how much you know about poker
If anything I think her and garret were in onit together. Knowing all of it it looks like had a deal with garret to lose the money she was staked to Garrett. Probably split with her.
Cards turn over, she wins, shes shocked. People are wondering why she called all in 100k+ USDwith j4 on that board. Now Garret has gotta overreact and throw a scene ending in her returning the money back to him LOL.
@@DieTryingK Ah yes cause millionaire Garret is risking his whole rep over 100k
@@dimitrijedragic3652 how is it a risk?
She really did try to defend the call and was flustered. It was indefensible call. The fact she would even consider giving someone their money back when she played fair is ridiculous. Non of this is 100 percent but stinks of guilt.
What is becoming indefensible is the attention this is getting.
Liars often touch their face while lying.
Two very important people in the high stakes poker world pull you down a hallway and pressure you to give the money back.
@@bs1820 I cannot imagine a lady who looks and acts like her to let two poker dweebs take money from her unless she was giving it to them. Just because I cannot imagine it does not mean its not true. People who know her better could answer that.
What if she is medicated ? my mother was on pills and acted with similar mannerisms and it explains why she is inconsistent and scatter-brained when she's explaining why she did what she did. Guilty people wouldn't talk so much and go on podcasts to explain etc. I think she was under the influence made some horrible plays that happened to worked out.
….”I’m sooo tired of having to explain what the truth is” as she tries to explain AGAIN what the true is 😫
talking fast without giving a chance for questioning, always the sign of a solid soul read
I have gone back and forth on this because I doubt it can be proven one way or the other that she cheated. But I keep getting stuck on this one point. The main argument against cheating seems to be she thought he was bluffing and had in her head that if he was bluffing she would win (regardless of her holding). That she was too inexperienced to realize J was not good 99% of the time even against a bluff. I would understand that if she was a total beginner, but looking at her history she has won decent sized tournaments and made day 4 of the main event. Anyone at that skill level would have to fold even if they though Garrett was bluffing.
I completely agree with this! Her calling his bluff, without cheating, means she it putting Garrett on exactly the hand he has because 99% of his other bluffs are ahead of her and she even admitted she thought he had Ace high which she loses too, obviously. The length of time and amount of times she checks her cards suggests to me she didn’t misread her hand but again that could just be a complete beginner’s mistake. But then again she’s not a complete novice at the game and has tournament background. I’m so mind boggled on which side I sway towards on this
Totally agree. She should at least explain why she lied about her actually know she had J4.
Completely disagree.
people are acting like this is her first day playing poker. she isn't a pro but she has plenty experience at the table.
Even if she had half a brain she would know that calling there would raise a lot of suspicion (in case she had the ability to know the hole cards and cheat). That makes me lean towards more of her being dumb than anything else
The issue here is if she cheated or not. Not about why she thought there was logic in calling there with J4. Next she’s going to tell us why the earth is flat.
Also who wins that much money in a hand and doesn’t fight her case when she’s asked to give it back? She should be angry if she didn’t cheat!
Joe when’s the next livestream and do you have other people lined up
I also find it very hard to find reasons why she is allowed a drink on the actual table, and why she takes it off the table when Gman realises something isnt right.
Shout-out to Jaka Coaching
So what do you think? A vibrating drink bottle that only she can hear and feel? Maybe a screen on it that only she can see?
No, no, no guys, not the the drink, not the ring, I´d like to think she used a chess style butt plug.
@Move Steady cowboy bob is Bobbi's "business partner" & friend & staked her 100% for the game. That's why he went nuts when she gave the $ back cause its "his"
Guys if she's cheating getting a signal she's not doing it via something on the table come on. Likely something concealed in clothes or.....you know where.
We are blinded in the present, but in the future the truth in hindsight will be clear as day.
Are you talking about Covid, Ukraine, Climat change, Inflation? Be more specific😄
I still wanna know why she was allowed to have that metal water bottle on the table
If you watch the start of the Hustler livestream when she comes in she places it on the felt and the guy setting up the table tells her to remove it and place it on her designated table....she puts it back on the felt a little later.
@@Bhodisatvas They need strict policies on mobile usage and accessories to minimize the security risks going forward. The promo puts Faraz Jaka in a really bad light
@@frochi I think the fact that Robbi is a student puts him in a worse light to be fair.
@@frochi I believe phones are not allowed at the table
@@martinedwards4522 rip isn’t her husband. Her husband is a big name lawyer of some kind.
Thanks. Exactly what I saw.
The part where she explains being shocked that gman wanted a refund and feeling bad that Ryan looked stressed out makes her look very guilty. No one thinks “what can I do to make it better” then hand over 6 figures of other peoples money while being staked after making the best call of your life.
that's not true at all. She looked high as a kite to me and in that situation you do real dumb stuff and get confused and change your story and it gets to the point where you just want it all to go away. Everybody evaluates it as somebody playing perfect mathematically correct poker and the reality is that many people just don't play like that and do dumbass stuff all the time and try to cover it up. Just this time the dumb decision turned out to be the right one and that's the way life is. Of course I could be completely wrong but that's my take on the situation. If I was off my face and people were coming at me all angry I'd be like here have the money just go away.
@@bushmanphotos you right about the high stuff
You so geniuses think a shady guy with a shady past would stake someone like that 100k and play with 25k himself??
Idiotic
Lol this dude acts like he's played at stakes like that. You can't just say "6 figures" like that's relevant to anything. Her giving him back any amount is insane to me, but the amount is completely irrelevant. Her handing over "6 figures" for a game at that stake is like you giving somebody back a 3 figure amount at your local 1-2 game. Obviously it's hypothetical, but you know what I'm saying. And when you start by saying "No one thinks" your argument is already 100% flawed.
If anything I think her and garret were in onit together. Knowing all of it it looks like had a deal with garret to lose the money she was staked to Garrett. Probably split with her.
Cards turn over, she wins, shes shocked. People are wondering why she called all in 100k+ USDwith j4 on that board. Now Garret has gotta overreact and throw a scene ending in her returning the money back to him LOL.
I really want Garret to be right for his sake, but I can’t see how this isn’t just a really fishy spaz call
@@martinedwards4522 he can always apologise and give back the money, if there will be no cheating detected
I don't see how they gonna prove she cheated. Probably cuz she didn't. I mean literally only way is a Hustler staff member being in on it.
@@keniffkeniff her husband said it’s too late for apologies, the damage has been done, GA posted the tweet accusing her of unquestionably cheating which can be seen as defamation. An apology doesn’t fix that donk tweet
@@sh0cktim3 why can't it be as simple as the thirsty cowboy signaling her to call.... they set it before hand...example "if I take my hat off and you have atleast j high call"
its cheating
I thought I heard her say, after she calls, before they show, he says "do you have a small pair" and she says "you give me too much credit". Did I hear that right?
She's massively playing the vulnerable woman card - it's putrid to listen to, when she's being called out for something that looks really, really fishy to anyone with an ounce of commonsense at poker. She had no business being there on the flop, let alone calling off on the turn, and with not even a reasonable bluff catcher.
Her defence now is that Garrett was "angry as hell"!? - he was enormously restrained at the table. He has her pretty obviously cheating him to his face, while giving him the rub down afterwards, then trying to defend it with the biggest lot of bs (I thought I had a "3", which has been discredited in multiple ways), the loss of over 100k to contend with, and a guy sat there to his immediate right chuckling at his misfortune - all the while knowing that he's being watched being cheated on a livestream that millions will subsequently watch.
Her tanking in spots where it doesn't make sense to, in this hand and others posted, screams that she's being fed rudimentary info on whether her hand is good or bad. What's likely happened is that, being fed that information, she's used it in a way that doesn't make any sense - she hasn't been clever with the info. In the same way as she potentially didn't use the information optimally in the A8 AK hand.
She thought she had a "3". Board is T993. Also the turn went bet 10k, raise to 20k, raise all in $129k effective, call $109k. Just saying you should edit your comment to "3" and "turn" instead of 4 + river.
And the JJ hand. Also to me the Ak vs A8 is played extremly good exploitatively, she disguise her hand strenght with a call, than floats, using range advantage, makes her move on the turn. It was an extremly good and thought out (accidental?) play or she read Eric Persson as well :). Robbi the mind reader.
@@RunItTw1ce4858 Holy shit she did not think she had a 3, she looks at her hand multiple times including for multiple seconds before calling. Shes is a complete liar
@@9BallBory I'm well aware of this. The initial comment said "4" and "river" I'm simply letting him \ her know they should edit their comment. She double checks her hole cards twice preflop and 10 seconds on the turn. The 4 is also the bottom, so she can't misread her hand and "only see the Jack or clubs." Im very aware of every detail of this investigation.
@@RunItTw1ce4858 Ah, yeah apologies - a 3/4. Ta
She is lying.She said on the show that she could refund Garrett herself.Garrett was not angry for money because he lost.He wins and loses a lot of money every day in poker, but this is the first time he has ever done such a thing.
We know for a FACT that she didnt misread her hand. She got the signal that she was ahead and called. Investigation over.
Great job helping to promote her new training site
Garrett definitely had his G String on that day🤣🤣☠️
Hearing her talk is honestly the biggest indicator to me. Her interview on the HCL stream and this Ingram stream are a very telling collection incoherent, inarticulate, inconsistent, and desperate sentences that ultimately fail to make a single point. It feels like she is grasping at straws the entire time she talks about the situation.
Tough spot to have to lie to an entire community that reads human behavior and solves logic puzzles for a living...lmao
nah she's just high... you're over analyzing it. Pretty typical behaviour for somebody buzzing on something.
I don't know, I am leaning in the direction of did not cheat, but needs to be looked in to more. Anyone else would have done this I would think definitely cheating going on, but this is so strange. I had no idea anyone could think like that 🤣🤣
@@adrianamatlack532 it's obvious she didn't cheat which was the general consensus until these recent "investigations" started rubbing off on these plebs.. then you see the type of folks on Joey's show that thinks she cheated & it all makes sense.. all the folks known for being reputable & sound i.e. Ivey, Stacks, Galfond sees her as innocent whilst the likes of coked out Durr, coinflex dogpoker & a bunch of characters from middle America come up w/ all these elaborate theories based on things like "why would she give the $$ back?" As if that's an actual evidence.. 🤦
Her excuses are so bad. Embarrassed into giving back the money? lol please, if i lucked out 130k id be laughing about it. No doubt she is lying here. Gman, had no intention of playing on after getting his money back, you dont play on with a potential cheat. He was fine losing 130k to a hand, you could see he knew he had lost with 8high, losing wasnt an issue.
Exactly right. He didn’t care about a “soul read” or being beaten. He was happy to give her the money. It wasn’t until she flipped her hand over and talked her way into an abyss that his mind was made up. That Ace high comment was the nail in the coffin.
She didn’t cheat
true her behaviour is weird she should be happy that she won 100 k in one pot but she acted like she did something bad
Garret gonna end up giving the money back and much more......
Exactly anyone defending Garrett is delusional , it sucks when you find out your hero is a spoiled cry baby but it happens all the time get over and try to think logically
Her stories kept on changing!!
"how do i still this post on the turn thinking i hold a 3" *checks cards, sees no 3* ill min raise then call a 100+k all in LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!
I think it was a one off cheat…she was signaled by Cowboy RIP that Garrett was bluffing and she called with a terrible hand….Cowboy assumed she had a better hand and/or Robbi would know what to do…which she didn’t
This ^^
This has made the most sense to me as it his money.
That is plausible, but that infers that someone else is cheating with no proof.
@@sarahdeshay1394 I agree….but something is off with that hand and the vibrating chair and ring and drinking bottle theories are just to far fetched…I think it was something simple and opportunistic, but alas we will never know for sure. A professional poker player would never make that call and her reasoning is complete nonsense so it makes me lean towards she did something wrong. About 70%-75%
What if it was not cheating but just a tell that was communicated to Robbi?
She asks if 3s are good. Possibly not to Garret but to the one communicating to her to see if she should call or not
It’s almost funny how people think Garrett was mad because he lost $130,000…….. the money has nothing to do with it. If she would have had a pair of 3s or something that could even make the call remotely possible, he never would have flinched.
Exactly
people are dumb and know fuck all
I feel like that line at the end is super telling... "you let me do this to you before, post-stream..."
To me that is literally the ONLY thing she has said that is suspect. But it's only one thing.
Her story would not hold up in Judge Judy's courtroom...
After hearing her and her husband explain things i think she's 100% cheating. J/K she sounds like she has no idea whats happening.
The more she talks the more she looks guilty! She's lied so many times. Even in this 6 min clip she lies. She reminds me of a person who does something right in front of you then ties to convince you that she didn't.... And of someone who is backed up against a corner and can't get out so she doubles down... It makes her look bad.
When in the timeline did she pick up the chips to hand them back to Garrett?
Since when people have to prove their innocence? This is ridiculous.
I think Joey said it best when he said mmm, hmmm 🤪
Its pretty simple. The woman called simply because she wanted to see his hand and was 99 percent sure she was dead BUT can afford to blow 100k + to do JUST that and gain some info. for future play with Garrett. She's got enough money to actually win the hand (she said she was shocked when she did) and give Garrett his money back.
Agreed except the 99% chance she was dead part.. was likely just thinkin he's bluffin & her though process just stopped @ if she catches him "bluffing" then she wins automatically.
@@prasg1186 she cant think hes bluffing if she called w J high lmao to me, thats just one of her lies and making it believable.
@@drzalejandro7 she thinks he's bluffing in the sense that he isn't connected but is has a drawing hand like he did & felt that she had a j3 despite folks raggin on her for staring @ her cards for ''15 secs", like that's some definite proof.. being practical one only has to look @ their card for a split sec, the longer they stare doesn't make it more x..infact it's likely the opposite.. she thought she had the 'bluffcatcher' & caught him despite misreading her hand..
gman tried to make sense of it as he did the 1k yd stare & all the answers she provided him just confirmed his suspicions whilst on her part she wasn't takin it as seriously bc she wasn't aware of his intentions.. gman took the $$ back & is now in too deep so has quadrupled down.
If you accidentally hit on a 20 and get a ace to get 21 do you give the casino the money back when casino turns over 20?
this is more like doubling down on 2-3 vs A blind before the dealer checks for blackjack and then getting a 6, and then the dealer flips over a 5 and then two face cards, except that you only started the bet with $5, and after seeing what a horrible situation you were in with hard 5 vs Ace you asked the casino if you could change your bet to $150,000 instead before the runout
As Judge Judy often remarks: “The truth flows out freely. When you er and ah, then you’re trying to think up a lie”
Judge judy. Isnt she an actress? Lol
She has got to stop lying about thinking he had a 3, she literally looks at her hand for multiple seconds before calling
Right, and when she flipped them over the 4 was on top so when she peeled them she 100% saw the 4 first on the bottom. 🤦🏻♂️
Watch the vid again. The part you're talking about is on the turn all-in call. Notice, her eyes are down---like a normal squeeze looks. Then after only 2 seconds, her eyes move up and away a little, like she's thinking. Meanwhile, her hands are still squeezing, so it looks like she's studying her cards the entire time.
Of course, the vid isn't 100% clear about where she is actually looking, so she could certainly be looking directly at her cards for the entire 8-10 seconds, or whatever. But I don't think so.
Means nothing.
I have done pretty much the same and seen worse.
Once called a guy 1500€ inna 5/10 game on the river. He has a FREE SGHOWDOWN.
He checks his hand twice, stares at it, tanks for 2 minutes, throws his hand in the muck face down.
1 second after, he reaches for the hand in the muck and turns it over and goes "oh i have the nuts"
Your theory is invalid
@@seankennedy4284 it doesnt matter how long she looked, she literally said no when asked two different times about references to the 3 on the board (a) "do you have 3s? (pocket 3s) which she replied, "no" and (b) "do you have a 3?" (she replied no) and then for good measure if those two arent clear enough.. garrett to her, "do you have a small pair" resonse, " you give me that much credit?"
Dosent matger what she siad during the hand, got asked like 8 questions while trying to call a massive pot.
Also the do you have 33 annd do you have a 3 was basicly asked 1 second after echother, could have missheard or answerd wrong as people do.
Also taking anything a poker player says about theeit hand durijg a hand as "evidence" is extremly ridicilous.
She wss clearly confused, alot.
Taht also dosen mean anything.
Cant belaive how bad people ar at understanding people.
Yes she lied alot.
No she didnt cheat
The more Robbi talks, the more I think she will start to admit to other crimes lol. 💯
Where is the clip where Rip calls in?
I spoke with Colombo and he scratched his head and said …..hmmmm I ain’t no genius but something just doesn’t quite add up.
1- Unexplained blatant vibration.
2- Unexplained clearly visible rectangle object in leggings.
3- The gang that can’t shoot straight has shady past.
4- Garrett is one of the most respected, gracious when losing, sharpest, top level A-list players around.(Dwan/Ivey)
5- Admission she thought he had A high and suicide calls with J high.
For the feminists: J high < A high
6- Incoherent explanation of all aspects of event.
7- Constant changing of story.
8- Rip, a 2/5 or 5/10 skilled player buys in 25k, yet stakes Robbi, 1/3 skilled player at best 150k.
9- After shove and CALL, when asked if she has a 3, clearly says “no, it’s purely a bluff catcher.”
10- Body language and soft play.
11- Repayment reeks of guilt, as no amateur who crushes a rich pro would do that invalidating their success, skill and achievement.
Mountain of evidence but verdict will be NOT GUILTY.
I heard they have Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden on the case.
Long Live “The Robbi”
The 4 Jack Off Hand
She’s the only one that’s got anger issues with Garrett. She hates Garrett,got greedy,knows the runout preflop and targeted Garrett. She/he is a fraud. Big hands and yes,she said it,big balls!!!
@@AdamGG33 inside. Her hate and anger at Garrett is internal.
Joey check out Bart Hanson’s take on this it’s the best one yet
Bart Hanson is a tool, he made a comparison with a 54 hand, that makes no sense whats so ever.
Wow they deleted all the videos?
Also at this point she's more than willing to keep changing her story because it benefits her giving her attention to "her brand" outside of poker as well.
What’s her brand? Is she a porn star?
Robbi's face and body are here best defense. They show a long history of terrible decisions that have horrible outcomes.
I'll never understand why people feel the need to disfigure themselves like that.
Stop acting like you wouldn’t hit
@@iwilloffendsimps I actually wouldn't. I'd rather have a chick that is ten years older and 100lbs heavier. I just can't do the plastic surgery thing, it completely grosses me out.
Literally makes me shudder, it's like looking at an alien or something.
Nose jobs and mild face lifts are fine but the lips and lipo sculpting are just yuk.
@@djsparkyy 🧢
@@iwilloffendsimps Honestly i'd really struggle with a person that looks like that. She has natural beauty and it's been ruined.
Not saying that to hate on her i just personally dislike that plastic look a lot. Not sure why maybe it's a fault within me. But it's perplexing from my point of view because they make themselves look worse.
Tits included nobody want to touch a garbage bag full of water.
Robbi: 3s are no good?
The guy next to Robbi: you have pocket 3s?
Robbi: Fuck no, this is a pure bluff catcher.
Robbi to Garret: I thought you have ace high.
Clearly she thought she have a pair of 3s.
What happened to all the videos?
Common sense would say "cease & desisted". Literally monetizing her suffering lol
joey's face the whole time 😂
If she was cheating, why would she choose to call $120,000 as an underdog?
Shes told the outcome will be in her favor from someone who knows ALL of the cards
That's what I'm saying. People are dumb. If she was cheating so many better spots to do it in.
Even the river
because she also knew the cards to come lol. thats the deeb/polk/adlestein take.
She continues to just ignore the fact she lies multiple times afterwards and created this for herself because of her lies. If she doesn’t lie to save face from an actual misread, it doesn’t look nearly as suspicious. She downplays Rip, “he just called him the P word”… no, he was yelling and cussing, looking like he wanted to fight Garrett. I lost all respect for her with how she’s tried to manipulate this situation and threaten to go after people legally.
💩
Make another 12 hour video on this. 🤣
love the original explaination , she called the all because she thought he was on ace high lollll
She didn’t say she miss read her Hand at the table she needled Garrett and acted like she knew her J high was good.
Go Joey!
Once you tell your 1st lie regarding that hand, your credibility is thrown out the window. You're now considered a liar.
@joeingram1
The chair vibration is not so difficult to test
Find someone to analyze the rate.
If it s a mechanic shaker it will be perfectly quantized to a specific rate.all the way though the vibration event.
Anything other than perfect even rate would be her leg bouncing
Same with the bottle vibration,
If it s from someone bouncing on the table it has a signature.
From a shaker every vibration will be even.
That said, maybe what I think is a water bottle could be a tea brewer with some internal automatic mechanical parts..
Saying all that to stay in the game so she could steal more. If she was smart she wouldn't have pick that hand but thats what greed does to you.
Or low IQ.
The fact that she lied about her hand and continues to do so, makes it hard for me accept that she didn't cheat, even if that is true.
No proof. No cheat....
wheres your proof?
their voice mics would have still been on? release the voice chat for all to hear and judge?
If you listen carefully to what the guy next to her asked “you have pocket 3s?” Meaning Trips. She said “hell no”. That’s true. She thought she has a pair.
If we are searching for the truth, Robbi is the last person to listen to.
you simply can't trust someone who looks like Robbi
🎵 Hair fake, lips fake, everything fakeee 🎵
only thing consistent about what she's said is the fact that everything that comes out of her mouth is a lie.
it makes it difficult for those who believe she is innocent to defend her
Agree
Listening to HER more clear “explanation” of what happened has moved me into the 100% she cheated camp. Don’t misunderstand me I think she’s too ‘stupid’ to cheat well, which is why she got caught. She got the signal that she was a head in the hand, but didn’t weigh out the fact that making this type of call with “absolute AIR” would only be done by someone who “knew” they were ahead at the time.
Yes I think you r right. If she cheated, it was a vibration being sent to her when she was ahead. That’s the only signal she could get. No signal for wat her opponent has no signal for if she should call. The only signal was buzz when she’s ahead which she was
@@astheworldburns3590
If you think this was a ‘normal’ play… you must be really bad at poker.
Has anyone ever even explained how she would have cheated? And if youre gonna cheat, why cheat on such a marginal hand? Why make your move on a 50/50 hand raising it into oblivion?
What's her story this hour?
💯 Its 100% that I am 100% that I am NOT 100% either way yet.💯
I’m confused why Joey didn’t explain the reason why Garrett is upset? It’s not that he lost the hand. It was her reasoning behind the call and her not just saying that she misread. She was aggressive to him afterwards and saying she played him. It would of been different if she just told him she misread her hand. Garrett would of just moved on.
Would he ?????
@@anthonymorris6801 of course, he would. It was when she tried to explain her reasoning, I put you on ACE high so I called. He then asked, why to call if you put me on ACE high with Jack high? All that makes you think something is up. He has the right to at least question it after that statement.
she was most likely embarrassed and wanted it to seem bad ass that she called with J high like she did it on purpose
You don't need to explain your reasoning for making a call in any form of poker. If I decide for any reason to call, I call. If I can afford to call of 1 million, thata my prerogative
@@anthonymorris6801 no he would not. He has developed a sense of entitlement by sitting in a game that is manufactured for him to crush. Yes, I did state "manufactured " for him.
Think back to all the hands you ever played, count the times jack high has called you and won, regardless if they are amateur or pro 🤣🤣
The classic raise to induce a turn 3 bet bluff all-in and then call with jack-high with 100% certainty you're flipping. LOL. Her actions only make sense given a binary signal of some sort and the play is not at all defensible, as her speech says nearly as loudly as the actions at the table.
she comes across EXTREMELY untrustworthy.
I only have one question- HOW she knew she is in front. There is no doubt she knew. Too many red flags here including giving money back and being confused why she called.
She didn’t, she just not believing in Gman.
@@Garrrrry5 Don't know much about chances, do you?
If someone throws three dice blind, and says he didn't throw three sixes, would you bet against him telling the truth, based on the fact that you think he's bluffing?
The most legit thing I take from this is her saying that part of the reason she made the call is she was already going to lose a bunch of money in the hand if she folded.
When you move up to bigger stakes that sortof bad illogical thinking does happen and instead of thinking I’m going to lose x amount of big blinds if I fold here but that’s fine your mind goes “oh shit I’m going to lose x amount of real dollars if I fold, better call to not lose it”
Not good way to think, but I remember my first times playing 5/10 moving from 1/3 I had that thought pattern a couple times.
ah yes, its totaly fine to play this stakes with no pokerskills
so lets talk about the elephant in the room. if you claim she is thinking about her money... why would this situation happen if she is not a cheat?
So put in over $100k with absolutely nothing because you have about $20k in the pot? Not buying it.
@@FULouis hey my name is clay too lol. I’m not saying it’s the smoking gun, I’m just saying out of everything she says, I identify with that thought pattern.
And for the record I can’t imagine the adrenaline of 20k of your money being in a pot. Maybe she thought she had less behind? Idk I’m pretty 50/50 on the whole thing
@@woodstock7799 he just explained it lol, it’s called sunk cost fallacy wherein unseasoned gamblers might risk it, even if it’ll statistically incur more losses than stopping.
From what point do you want him to speculate on an imagined outcome? Because you’re really just speculating entirely. In observed reality, the circumstances combined with her informed decisions led to a win, however unlikely, stupid or absurd.
So what hypotheticals are needed? Are you assuming she should’ve folded when reading her cards, or at the end after Garrett’s raised the call to all-in? What cheating method could explain her actions, either she only knew Garretts cards, or she was in collusion with the dealer and knew both Garretts cards and the river cards.
But these require different cheating methods; if it’s “simple” RFID scan she’d know Garretts cards sure, but in that case why’d she cheat on such a sketchy hand? Why not play it safer?
If collusion, RFID scanners aren’t enough, so what method was used to cheat between her and the dealer?
It’s baffling you think these alternative imaginary Jason Bourne plot lines are more reasonable than the likely -and very possible- explanation: she’s not good at poker.
I’ve made terrible calls been way behind and still won. It happens. Move on, if she’s such a fish, you’ll get it back by the end of the night. If she’s cheating, she won’t be able to so easily in future hands. Have a quiet word with the floor & bosses and explain what they should watch for. GMan screwed himself.
I call shit like this all the time when £8’s on the line
Reading the comments I don’t appear to be the only one too lol
It's all lies. "It was a high pressure situation" you have to read as "I was relaxed because I knew I was ahead". She is quite good at lying though.
After a few days are looking at this I don’t think she cheated
Agree. Sure like see how many of the people (who think she is cheating), would risk 100K and make that call. I would only do it if the river is run at least 6 times.
Agreed! She's not very experienced at poker and that's why her explanations don't make sense!
@@marksimpson2321 I guarantee 100% if river was 6,7,8,J, or any club, he would have taken the money with a big smile. The river was basically a toss up.
Spicy 🌶 Papi !
' I felt bad I won a had that I shouldnt have won'' - That part sounds honnest to me :)
On the fence here. While her defense is reasonable, that investigation is warranted.
Note at 5hr 2min 40 sec of the stream she is talking to Andy about having Ryan delete the footage.
@@RunItTw1ce4858 Wow..Wow..