DID Garrett Adelstein GET CHEATED for A $270,000 pot??!?!?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 вер 2024
- The craziest poker hand in History happens on Hustler Casino Live stream
On the date of September 30th 2022 I am not accusing anyone of cheating or breaking the law.
Did Garrett get cheated or did Robbi make the best call in poker history?
Jaka coaches her. Did he invent see thru glasses 👓?? 😂
NO.
She was just sick of his bluffing her and made a fish/donkey call that held up.
Nothing to see there.
The real story is KAREN ADELSTEINS entitlement getting checked.
best call? More like I don’t know
wtf I am doing call
SHE DID BEST CALL
She made the dumbest best call in poker history
Garrett looks around as if he's expecting Ashton Kutcher to spring out any second and shout "you've been punked!"
Would be a hilarious punk episode to set up a televised high stakes game where everyone is in on it accept the high stakes pro being pranked. All in for like a million dollar pot on a 885 board. Guy getting pranked has 88, other guy has AA and turn and river come AA.
hahahaah
And for now on when someone missreads a hand and loses, Garrett then gives that money back. Then this Garrett`s logic makes sense. There is no poker player who has never ever missred a hand, it has happened even to Ivey so this Garrett`s whining is totally unforgivable. His reputation goes down to toilet in one sigle hand.
lol, I thought the same thing
Great idea!
Pearson saying “Garrets a deep sea fisherman” after he got the money back is a hilarious comment i cant stop laughing 😂
Pearson was a crying little bitch couple weeks ago when he punted off $500K and stormed out sooooo consider the source
Time stamp?
Wtf does that even mean?
What does that mean?
@@youbluethatone1017 15:05
Phil Ivey just sitting there thinking “ these amateur’s don’t even know how to angle”😂😂😂
It’s looks like you don’t know who Garrett is !! His the goat of high stakes poker!!
Phil was like keep your relationship at home.. daddy was pissed at mama.. mistress
@@michaelmunoz3978 the goat crying like that. No sir. No Goat asking for a rebate.
@@michaelmunoz3978 From now on he’s the pussy of high stakes poker😂😂
Phil is the greatest.
She didn't think she had a 3. She asked if 3s are good BEFORE calling to either stall or get a read or just mess with Garrett. After she called, and before she showed her hand, she CLEARLY said that she didn't have a pair of 3s
This was an obvious lie… so many things adding up to be 100% sketchy
Lex, Thank you! I REALLY appreciate you showing the clips in full and not pausing and interrupting every few moments and just allowing us to watch the hand and then give your recap and thoughts! I cannot stand reaction videos that don't let the thing they are reacting to play and stop it and chime in every 30 seconds. It's so hard to get an understanding of what happens when anyone does this.
This was cool. Nice video!
In Rip’s defense, it’s really distressing when a con artist gets made.
And to lower yourself to misandrist comments to prove ur point is for losers. Her story changed several times, no person in their right mind gives 100k up when they didn’t cheat. Her story is weird. Personally I would never give the $ back out if principle if I didn’t cheat
@TRAVELER it’s called guy behind scenes looking at cards letting her know
I love Andy man. “ If she didn’t cheat, why would you give home the money back”? We’re all still waiting for that real answer…
Actually it was the guy next to Andy. The one who also said "I don't see how you could've cheated."
Wasnt her money and they thretend her.
There you go
You clearly never saw Garrett crying and begging for his money with those pityful dogeyes. He does that all the time to get his money back.
@@notro7672 You're being sarcastic but that's actually the case. When she sais "I put you on Ace high", the way Garrett answers "Why did you call with Jack high then?" obviously implies she made a mistake. In her mind he's talking about the small bet on the flop, that's when she calls with Jack high. Now he gets even more aggravated, understandably so because what she sais doesn't make sense to anyone who looked at the cards. He asks "So you called all-in on the turn because....?", and she is upset with this question because she just explained it to him, she hit a bottom pair on the turn so why not call against Ace high? Now clearly upset she responds "yeah... because you didn't have sht", as in "it was a perfect read, why do you look like you saw a ghost and why are you complaining and asking the same question twice".
I cannot blame Garrett at all for responding this way to a Jack high 3-bet all-in call especially considering the conversation. But playing the hand back and just imagining her hand is J3, which she had the previous hand, it all adds up. Now it's a giant misunderstanding, credit to the commentators for already guessing she misread it, don't blame them for thinking it's impossible because she stares at those cards but from what she sais and the decisions she makes it's clear.
The thing that really set up this disaster is the table talk I think. They say "that was sick!" when the cards are revealed. Everyone is so speechless, that nobody repeats exactly what happened. Everyone is talking about the action, nobody points out directly how she won with Jack high because everyone seems to have to digest that. The reaction of the table is one of the most confusing reactions ever in itself. She's pumped with adrenaline just won a big hand expecting everyone to cheer for her, I'm wondering if she only realized what hse had done when Garrett tried to figure out wtf happened or if she realized earlier already and was embarassed so she kept it to herself.
Instead of Survivor, Garret should on Naked and Afraid 😱
She literally changed the story about the money conversation THREE TIMES
So.
On top of that she gives a long, rambling-ish interview that includes the kicker line "I don't like drama." OMG. Long live the Queen!
@@measlymitch778 stop being a fucking feminist for a sec..bitch
@@measlymitch778 Clearly proves that she has no idea wft she's doing. Pure Donkey
@TRAVELER Giving the money back was an admission of guilt. She was spooked that the matter would be looked into more closely, and thought well, if I give it back maybe they'll drop it. She doesn't have the presence of mind to deal with the situation any other way.
And there is no way she misread her hand. When she flipped the cards over she would've reacted that she didn't have a 3 if she thought she did. So her saying that in the interview is suspicious AF too
Ask the doctor u will find out lot of times brain can control your eyes when you under pressure or excite or anxious emotionally
@@pennytang3306 actually, in a really tense moment like that, your brain would respond with shock realizing that you didnt have the hand you thought. Also, she literally LOOKED at her hand for like 10 seconds before calling, so that makes 0 fucking sense
Her poker hand reading skills are about as real as her breasts.
Garrett got cheated 100%.
That happened to me lots of times misread my card even I checked my card multiple times. It’s mostly happened to a woman, guys never get it.
She made stupid call before the river, but she wasn’t cheating. If she lost , g will give her money back because she misread the hand?
She changed her story. First she said she was making a hero call, then she said she misread her hand. Then she gives the money back. Very suspicious
She wasn’t even a favorite so why would she cheat this hand ?
She changed her story 5x
Cheating makes no sense here, and having j3 there would be a sick hero call
@@knorre111 I agree it would be. But she knew she didn’t have a 3. She said so herself right before and after she called. Someone asked her if she had a 3 and she said no. Then Garrett asked her if she had a small pair and she said “you give me so much credit?”.
She didn’t misread her hand. That’s just one of the many stories she came up with afterwards to justify the egregious (or illegal) call.
YEA MAN SHE CHANGED HER STORY ! SHE CHANGED HER STORY !! LMAO !! THAT MEANS SHES A FKIN CHEAT !!! ONLY CHEATS CHANGE THEIR STORIES ! SHES A CHEAT !! SHE CHANGED HER STORY !! LMFAO !!! CHANGED HER STORY !! THAT MEANS SHES A FKIN CHEAT !! LMAO
Garrett clearly has never seen rampage play if he thinks that sort of call never happens
Nah dude come on something isn’t right in this hand we all know it
Haha love it.
I agree with you. Rampage is one of the worst poker player I've seen play on tv.
Hahaha after all the drama this gave me a good laugh ty 😆
@@TrollingCoyote she said she had 3 a bluff catcher.
Since when in poker do we care WHY someone called, bet or folded. She won, whether Garrett understands why she called or not.
The guy shoved all in on a draw holding 8 high. You can't expect to win with that play and you can't be angry when you get called. What a big baby.
He had straight flush draw with lots of out. Regardless of what he had there is no way you van call all in for over $100k with J4.
I think the weirdest part was her reaction to winning. Imagine calling a 109k allin on the turn running it twice and winning both with Jack high. Wouldn't most people be celebrating a little after bricking in your mind only to see J High is good? She seemed to know she was good before the cards were turned over and her only worry was to make sure Garrett was OK. Also odd she misspeaks and says Jacob instead of Garrett. She had a lot of wordsalad that came across very nervous. Obviously no proof right now just very weird.
Great observations. This is what I wrote, wondering if you might agree "She kept checking her hole cards before she called, so hard to understand how she could think she had bottom pair. The J high call would almost certainly have to be cheating. You got to wonder if she really is that out of it. Doug Polk said she seems to be lol. But she has played a lot the last 10 years, and the fact that she gave her hole cards a good look over before she called, how could she think she had bottom pair? Then she said she called with J high cause the though he had A high. She is either the most unqualified person on earth to play poker, totally spaced out, or cheating lol. Who knows, I was certain she cheated, but it's just so strange, and people can act so unpredictable when questioned and accused, not really sure what to think anymore, but very very very suspicious, and should be looked into, perhaps the FBI should interview her."
Too much plastic surgery. She can't make excited facial emotions.
She knew she embarrassed her sugar daddy in front of millions and made him look like a girl.. she knew he's dumping her... They are f. Buddies
@@nsant yep she’s gonna look like an orc in about 20 years
@Jay Baker that's why I thought it was weird his name was in her head
She rechecked her hand 2x after he put her all in, she 100% knew she didn't have a 3
Yep, I saw that
She also knew his hand she saw his cards when he picked them up he leaks out the back end.
Wtf you are right !! I just went back and saw it, also did you notice she seemed odd like in a weird state of silent mind like she had a listening device ? Or maybe Lauren the dealer and her know each other and colluded
That is just an act you do to make villain confused. I do that sometimes myself, and I can assure you i do NOT see the cards, but I literally eat all the information I can on my opponents reaction to my "2nd look on cards". ;)
@@raydalton1110 She does not need the dealer from where she is sitting. If he does not go all in if he misses she jams and does not have to show down. But why run it twice.
Best part is Ivey just quietly watching children being children.
Real men only cheat the casinos. Though he was forced to give it all back.
@@cclouse14 if you dont think ivey cheated on fulltilt.
Lmao
He said " white people'
Ivey would've lost his mind and snap accused her of cheating if he was the one with the 98cc.
@@S3CONDGLANCE 😂wtf
If you forget the actual cards for a minute it becomes obvious she cheated. She couldn't STOP smiling during the entire decision period of whether to call. She did KNOW she had a hand that should never call but she KEPT GETTING THE SIGNAL she was a winner. She was EMBARRASSED about calling (yet she knew she won). She couldn't figure out HOW TO ACT in the act of calling. She did it and had a big smile on her face -- it was a smile of embarrassment more than anything else.
Ridiculous. People don’t understand the pressure of playing on stream under the lights, against (the then) a star with a billboard of his face at the casino. It’s extremely intense.
She misread her hand, didn’t want to admit it, and then was forced to admit it because cry baby Adelstein made all these ridiculous accusations. You play with fish and they make fish moves. Then you cry about it and claim cheating? Garrett finally got exposed for who he really is.
@@johnlanton9363 Ridiculous.
Your comment is what I would call "ridiculous." I don't even like Garret but that hand is super suspicious and she switched her story so many times that I don't believe her. Remember when she said that she thought that he had ace high and he asked her then why did you call with a jack? I think that she was embarrassed to call even though she KNEW that she had A winner. @@johnlanton9363
@@johnlanton9363 how the hell do u forget whats in ur hand LMAO... smh i have watched it multiple times before... aint no way any PERSON let alone a poker player is calling anything.. she said she put him on ACES!!! if thats the case y not fold. na something was def going on u dont call that every unless ur gettin info from somewhere else.
“Garrett is is a deep sea fisherman. How did he dothat?” Eric Persons is great
legendary comment
Even if she misread her hand or not, she had no idea what the river cards are gonna be. If they split or she lost....we would not be accusing her of cheating
Someone else in the comments said this already and I had the same thought, but if you’re cheating, would you really call in a spot where it’s basically a coin flip? I think that makes even less sense than calling with jack-high without any cheating whatsoever.
@christian is this comment for realy. With the money thats already involved she get the right odds to call the jamm. there on the river
I’m not saying anything about pot odds - rather she can’t make that call while cheating without the thought of serious repercussions. It just doesn’t make sense to cheat in that spot.
@@chrisb.7835 really? Someone shoves on you with no pair or overs and you think that doesn’t call for cheating?
Exactly she was actually behind! Also cheating is hard to pull off so unless its clear that cheating is happening the assumption is always that there is no cheating. There are 10 cameras on all of them I'm sure if cheating was happening they can pick up on it..
He had 19 outs on the river and running it twice. If she knew his cards she would never have taken that risk.
She seems a little green and unorthodox when it comes to poker etiquette but also 99% honest and 1% bashful at this point.
I agree with everything you said on your take with this....The question I am left with, is HOW could she possibly have cheated. When she confidently says this is purely a bluff catcher, that means she thought he was bluffing with two cards 87 or less and excluding the 3. Even if she knew his hand, they ran it two times, there is no way she could have known what the two rivers would be.
Her excuse/reasons were as fake as her......well you know
She loses to a lot of bluffs like QJ or ace high.
Bullshit bluff catcher with a J makes no sense, cheating definitely
She tired of getting buff all the time. Thought she had a 3. Was embarrassed to admit at first.
Because she knew one thing from the buzzer. That she had the best hand at that point in the hand.
Her inconcistent stories are what making people think that something is definitely off. If she stuck with "i really thought my j high was good" then this is already over with and the story would be Garrett getting soul crushed by a rec.
Thats my tought. If you are cheatting you dont do any of this....because if she Is(I dont think so) just blown it didnt she?
I think the issue is all the emotions and drama surrounding it. Her first excuse wasn't accept well enough, so she embellished the story further. Don't see anything nefarious here, unless poker stupidity is nefarious.
Garrett was embarrassed because it happened in front of Phil Ivey who is his idol
There was COLLUSION at that table last night lol
I like the point you made at the end where she only came back with an explanation after being accused of cheating
I have never seen so much emotion in a poker hand. I can feel the emotions!!
Robbi has her cards peeled from 2:42-2:54. How in the world could she possibly think she had a 3? She stared at her cards for over 10 seconds.
She was table talking... asked him he could beat a 3 cuz she didnt have one even less of a hand than that. She did not cheat it was an epic move
2:42 she checked her hand
4:30 Andy and the people at the table ask her do she have a 3 and she said no.
LMFAO! @ 3:20 Robbi said' 3's no good?' She thought she had pair of 3s. Go and watch the whole video, earlier she played with J-8 suited vs. Garrett Q-4 offsuit.
@@solosensei8188 they asked pocket 3s , big difference, use your ears
@@jk8176 they asked pocket 3 then asked a 3. She said no no. How good is your ear? Lol
Reminds me of a hand I played with a solid player in 2/5 like 10 years ago. When I bluff-jammed 800 all in on the river and I was called by J high . The sick part was I was bluffing with the best hand and insta mucked my ace high. He said he had me on a lower str8 draw. I learned a valuable lesson not to ever muck my hand again
people also try the shady "I have 2 pair" when one of the pair is on the board and their other pair is shit just to get you to fold a better pair.
That’s your problem you should’ve been smart enough too bad you are good thing that the money went the other way paid his bills are not yours he deserved it
Did floor checked the cameras?
@@userac-xpg All the old people always say that shit dead serious "i have two pair" when board is paired its so annoying
@@userac-xpg this happened to me and worse than mucking my winning hand was that it out me on foot losing the rest of my profits
In her interview after she said she misread and though she had a pair of 3s, that she didn't recheck her hand. Not only did she recheck her hand after Garrett shoved, when she called, someone asked if she had 3s and she said no she just thought garrett didnt have anything. She's clearly lying, which means she's covering something up.
So glad I saw this live this was amazing
The issue is her conflicting stories. If she straight up says she misread her hand from the get go, then easy and done with. But she tried to save face by insinuating she made an insane hero call with J high. Her giving the money back makes me believe her less
If she has the ability to cheat there are so many better spots.
Come on how can she cheat she was 47% againtst 53% for garett . cheating would be stupid because you have more chances to lose all your money . For me this is the craziest read i have ever seen a legendary hand from The girl .
No the issue is Garrett acting like a child after losing 100k with an 800k stack. Then having the nerve to take the money back and tell her she was 5k short.
Even if Garrett has nothing on the board, he can still have QJcc, AXcc, and other combinations of hands that would beat her. It’s just not adding up to me. If you think calling with J high there is reasonable in anyway or think that constitutes a hero call, you’re welcome to any house game I play at. She pretty much had to know he didn’t at least have another J or better…otherwise you’re risking $100k to chop?? Cmon now
yeah 100% changed her story, she tried to be a hero at first, then decided shed rather just have the dumb luck
We saw it all. She did not cheat regardless of her poor play.
I hope you are at my next poker table.
@@adrianamatlack532 I hope you you are as well.
@@adrianamatlack532 let me know when, I wanna join too.
Same i'd clean out your account with that mindset
There is a lot more info coming out indicating cheating along with her partner RIP. Stay tuned
People saying Garrett was a sore loser are ridiculous. He was smiling right before she showed her hand, knowing that he lost the whole pot. He was fine with losing that pot…until he sees what she had.
True
It was a crazy hand. It was one in a million, but Robi didn’t cheat!! Garrett should return the money to Robi
I agree. How could she cheat? If you know Garrett’s cards, there’s no way in hell you’re calling that. He has so many outs. She thought she was using the Jack as a bluff catcher and then realized after the hand how stupid it was based on the players reactions and then started to change her story so that she didn’t look so amateurish.
Agreed, give it back. If this girl wants to make 100k punts with J high, encourage her! I guess her play short circuited Garrett's bot brain
She didn’t have to explain herself, it didn’t matter. She clearly made a bad call, and was somehow correct. Imo she wouldn’t have called if she knew his hand because he had sooooo many outs.
You dont need to know what someones cards are to cheat, all you need to know is that you are ahead.
There are so many ways to cheat with live stream.
I've never seen her play a single hand. But this looked EXACTLY like Potripper.
Her answers and giving it back make everything look even more suspicious
In addition to her saying she misread her hand an hour after, during the table talk when garrett said “unless you have 5s” and she said “you give me this much credit” she clearly had to know she did not have a pair. Very strange
Couldn’t she have meant she had a lower pair like 3’s? Because those are worse than 5’s?
@@mikefetters6674 I think on any other board, yes. But in this space I’d put a pair of 3s and 5s in the same class of hands credit wise.
Not strange. There is no excuses for Garrett. He was slapped around like bitch
She didn't have a pair because it got counterfeit in the river. Still rooting for G-Man though
she knew Gman cards for sure. that's why she called it. I don't know what trick. but I would call if I know Gman cards
Garrett before the last river was shown “what a sick call 😅”
No sir, that was one of the sickest calls…
of all-time
She misread her hand, Garrett lost it fair and square. She shouldn't have given the money back. I've misread hands before, but for 200 dollars pot not 120,000.00. Crazy money! Good video Lex!
How did she misread her hand? She stared at her hand for a solid 10 seconds before she called. It’s also fucking odd that when she flipped over her hand she had 0 reaction.
She stated during the hand she didn't have a 3 and that it was a "pure bluff catcher." She then changed her story. Nice try.
When I first saw the hand without any commentary I was thinking: she misread her hand as j3 (she basically said it during the hand) and didn't want to admit it. That's what happened 100 percent. Garrett should give the money back.
The problem with that story is she rechecks her hand multiple times before calling. But I still don’t how she cheated. I’ve seen terrible players make calls based on “reads” despite only beating one hand. 🤷♂️
U know it’s serious when every poker UA-camr makes a video regarding this issue😳
Interesting how Rip went silent during the next hand while she "explains" her bullchit
I think that people have a tendency to not admit mistakes right up front and I think she obviously made one but benefited at the end
There is much more to this than meets the eye. I can't wait to see what "revelations" come out on Friday as promised by Nick (though he said they would not come from him/HCL), and how the whole thing shakes out.
1. It would be the most stupid spot ever, to try to cheat. Too obvious, and too lacking an edge. Garrett had an open ended straight flush draw plus two live cards. It was a coin flip. You don't cheat to "get the money in ahead" when your opponent has 21 outs (or even 19 with 2 of them in her hand).
2. If she knew the river card, or just knew "Texas style" who was going to win from the shuffler, she sure wouldn't have asked to run it twice. Are people REALLY accusing her of knowing her hand would win BOTH rivers? Would she want to DOUBLE the chance of the dealer screwing up a burn card or something? No way.
3. If she knew the river card or who was going to win a runout, then both the casino and the production team are at fault for dealing a crooked/insecure game.
4. The hand prior to this, she had J3, this hand she had J4. Have you ever remembered your cards from the previous hand instead of the current hand? I have. I bet every street thinking I had TPTK, when all I really had was the nut nothing. It was at limit holdem, where firing every barrel isn't always effective!
5. When she "was looking at her cards for 15 seconds" they didn't seem to be separated much, or raised much from the table. It's entirely possible that she just likes holding her cards that way, or was just staring at the Jack of Clubs, rather than checking that her kicker really was a 3. The brain also tends to see what it's expecting to see.
6. When she was talking after the turn card, while considering calling the shove, it really seemed like she thought she had a 3 which the turn paired, or was at least representing that she had a 3. The paired 3 fits the desciption of a pretty bad hand, but still a bluff catcher. Jack high, much less so.
7. When the first river card counterfeited the paired 3, her talking implied that she'd been counterfeited, or at least wasn't very hopeful about her chances. We all know the feeling of going from being ahead of an ace, to being behind an ace. Or in this case, suddenly behind an ace, king, or queen.
8. She claimed that she didn't have a "small pair" when Garrett asked. She could have interpreted the question to mean "small (pocket) pair". And it's OK to lie during a hand!
9. I find it completely normal to get confused about what I said during a hand, after a hand. Admittedly, I'm 65 and she's not, but it's easy to get flustered/defensive when embroiled in a controversy, especially in a hand you made big mistakes in, whether those mistakes are bet sizing, misreading cards, talking when you should have shut up, getting someone's stack size wrong, calculating outs wrong, calculating pot odds wrong, or anything else.
Regardless of whether Garrett thought he was cheated, his beef should have been with HCL, not with her. Once a pot is pushed to someone, it is theirs, and your beef becomes a beef with the casino. VERY unprofessional of him to take the money back from her away from the table, even if she was offering that. We've all given or at least seen little "refunds" AT THE TABLE, with the permission of the floor, in odd circumstances. Maybe an uninvolved player's card fouls/mucks an opponent's hand, or a chop wasn't spotted until after a pot was pushed, or an 80 year old fish misread the suit of a card at the other end of the table, etc. But moving chips between players away from the table, with or without accusations of cheating, simply should not be done, and I blame Garrett for accepting it, more than I blame her for offering it.
You nailed it. Great comment.
I have made mistakes during the 100000s of live hands I have played in my life. I must admit also I have blurted out some nonsense explanations instead of admitting it. Robi doesn't owe Garrett anything. If he proves she cheated, come with the evidence or at least a plausible scenario, otherwise be a good sport and give her her money back.
I once called a loose player with 10 6suited because I was so curious to make his previous action make sense to me and learn how he plays. It was a limit game and not an all-in call. He had 10 8off and took down the pot anyway with his kicker, was embarrassing to have to explain why I called when the other players all asked how I didn’t win but it really came down to just that, curiosity. Besides, I mostly thought I was beat by at least a pair and wouldn’t have to show my hand.
This drama that got started, then kept increasing, is unfortunate for both players because neither of their reputations will go unquestioned from now on in the comments of all the reaction videos of this hand. It’s going to be remembered for its novelty of a drama afterwards as well as just a bizarre call. As for ethical behavior, I think it’s gonna suck to be Garrett cause he’ll not hear the end of this for a long time.
Ya, this all was just a bizarre session.
Maybe she was only signaled that she was ahead but not knowing his exact hand? Any poker player should know there's something up with that call and her explanation and offer to return the money makes it even more suspicious 🤔
That’s what I was thinking no one is that dumb if they are cheating to call there. She obviously just thought fuck it
I don't gamble. I don't play poker. I'm watching every stream about this. It's fascinating.
I’m addicted to seeing to seeing Garrets face drop when he sees her hand
If you were cheated wouldn’t you give that look?
The pain!
By the way, love your videos. Can't wait to watch when the new ones are posted. Keep it up, you're a class act.
The stupidest statement in poker I have ever heard: "I didn't deserve to win so I gave the money back". OK, let's review all hands in poker history and award the money accordingly based on this logic.
So, she didn't say immediately "Oh, I misread my hand"? So, what? Give her some credit for being a human. I'd say she felt embarrassed that she'd misread her hand and the first impulse was to defend her action one way or another. It's nobody effing business how she plays or what she does with her money.
Unless they can prove that she was cheating, the production should apologize and give her back the money.
Edit: after watching the actual video, it seems to me she did say "I don't have a pair" so she knew her actual hand and didn't misread it.
Gman should've just walked away and demand an investigation. He can't take his money back on a suspicion. No respect!
Where did she say " I don't have a pair"? That is critical, if she did say that then almost certainly was cheating. The whole defense is that she thought she had bottom pair. You really think she is going to call that much money with J high when she thinks he has A high? You bring up some points, but you also brought up something that I was looking for. Would you mind pointing out where and when she said " I don't have a pair"? I heard her say she did not have a pocket pair of 3s, everything she said is critical. I am not sold that she did not cheat, or cheated, but it looks very bad, and something that odd should not be swept under the rug so fast. I bet if you just lost 150,000 dollars to that then you might have some questions too?
@@adrianamatlack532 At 2:11:53 in the full video, someone to her left asks "Do you have a pocket 3?". To which she replies "No". And then she continues to explain "This is a pure bluff catcher". The only pair she could have as a value is a pair of 3s and she knows she doesn't have it. It's also clear from the picture that she checks her cards before calling.
And then, after the first river card G asks: "Do you have a small pair, like a pair of 5s". And she says "You give me that much credit?" Doesn't she realize that she is losing the first runout with a small pocket pair??
The whole thing is so bizarre...
@@martindim7182 But she might have meant a pair of 3s in the hole, for a set. His question was not that precise on what he meant. So the do you give me that much credit could still have her with 3s. BUT I do not see how she could think she has a pair when she was looking at her hand on the river before she called. She did check it and it was a somewhat careful check. Unless she has very bad eye site I can't understand that.
The only person that would ever give money back is a person who knew they got caught cheating.
I’ve been playing poker for 23 years. I’ve seen at least 100 instances of players misreading their hands, I’ve done it myself a few times. Literally 100% of the time when the player turns their hand over and sees they don’t have what they thought…THE FIRST THING WE ALL SAY IS “I misread my hand, I thought I had _____”. She doesn’t do this. Instead she slow rolls her hand over grinning the whole time (dupers delight) knowing her J high was good. She checked her hand for a solid 15 seconds before calling. Garrett even says “you have 5’s…do you have a small pair?”, she says “you give me that much credit?…No, I have a shitty hand.” Someone says “you have 3’s” and she responds “no, I don’t…I have…a pure bluff catcher”. She knew exactly what she had, so why is she lying? Why is she later saying “I thought I had J3” when every thing she said and did showed she knew she did not have a 3?
Edit: this is my theory/speculation. I don’t see how a card reading device could be in use here, if there was there’s WAAAY better spots to be picking your battles.
So what could have happened? Her buddy across the table could have seen Garrett’s hand and signaled the “okay” to her to call. If that was the case, she would be in quite the predicament, because although she now would know Garrett is bluffing, she doesn’t know what he has exactly. His bluff could be beating her. So that’s what she’s thinking about. It’s also why she was willing to run it twice in case she needed it to hit a pair against Ace high or something. She even says “I thought you had Ace high” which means she certainly considered him bluffing with Ace high. The point is, she KNEW he was bluffing, it was just a matter of “with what”. Watch the footage again with this in mind and to me it makes the most sense.
I like your analysis. Good news is they have six cameras and are investigating. If there was any signaling it will come out. It wouldn’t be this one hand. It’d be many.
I like your analysis. Good news is they have six cameras and are investigating. If there was any signaling it will come out. It wouldn’t be this one hand. It’d be many.
i used that exact term when debating this with my wife when giving my opinion on if she was cheating (dupers delight).
Nonsense. Robbi had no clue what she was doing. She later pretended to have misread her hand out of embarrassment once she realized she had made the dumbest call in TV poker history.
Did you watch any of her insane kitchen table poker beginner plays earlier in the stream? She totally fucked up, got lucky, and won a huge pot. THAT IS WHAT HAPPENED.
In 20 years of poker this is the most insane hand I have ever seen.. especially for a 150k bet 😂😂😂
Go watch Titan... TOM Dawn 7-2 vs. Asian dude 8-4...something like that. The asian dude re-raised TOM on the turn...making TOM Dawn FOLD. Both have nothing with the board. Asian player win with 8 high! ..l$500K+++ raised. On nothing.... HUGE pot... win with 8 High..not Jack high...
@@edwardlopez1176 i don’t think you get it…i saw that hand on Triton but this is a complete different thing
@@edwardlopez1176 people bluff all the time nobody calls a $109000 all in with J high big difference.
@UCYIThaUVu7FIol-UaB-Iz4A this is different. She called the all in… she wasn’t bluffing.
@@edwardlopez1176 Bluffing with 8 high is one thing. Calling an all in for $150K is a totally different thing.
she made a donk call expecting to lose but ended up winning. THEY RAN IT TWICE, she didn't cheat. the way garrett reamed her off stream until she gave the money back was ridiculous. lost respect for G man over this, but not that he cares, i'm just some internet troll.
Really she made a good call she tells him I'm playing you not the hand. Every time Garrett does that bully play everyone folds and you cockriders call him the goat. Someone called his bluff . We all know it takes 5 cards for a straight not 4
What I don’t understand is why she says after the hand “I put you on ace high” and he then asks why she called w J high and she says “you didn’t have shit.” I do not think there was cheating involved, I just think that maybe she saw she had blockers and figured he was on a draw. Everything she said after the hand confused me
She is undoubtedly telling the truth. Garret embarrassed himself and left.
Garrett got absolutely berated by Rick though, like he was being harassed, I'd leave at that point regardless.
Personally I think her behaviour is very suspicious. As you said this isnt a big pot to Garrett. He didn’t even lose a quarter of his stack. He has been a consummate professional when previously lost big pots and been slow rolled. Would 100 percent believe his version of events. Also if you check the footage she re checked her hand before she called. No way you misread your hand pre flop then check and misread again and make that hero call especially in a game 10x what you normally play.
Watching his eyes get big and he looks directly over at the table at Andy and another player he trusts and who helps run games let’s you know exactly how shocked he was and he immediately thought something was up.
If he can’t prove she was cheating Garrett is completely in the wrong. He’s the one who is always shoveling money in pots trying to bully people and now he’s taken it off the felt and bullied her for the money back.
I think she just made a fishy/lucky hero call that looked very sketchy to say the least. If she were cheating, she would pick a better spot to do it. I feel like she gave the money back because she felt pressured.
No such thing as a hero call with Jack high… Ace high fine, King high sure.. Queen high ehhhh probably not.. Jack high?? No such thing.
@@lordtraxx4217 100%. I've been playing poker for 13 years and I've NEVER at any level seen a jack high all in call.
In a way, I admire his nerve. Maybe anyone who can accuse her of cheating and ask for his money back deserves it. I never would have.
Garrett didn't get cheated.
If the money doesn't matter to him, why the hell does he ask for it back/ take it when she offers?
She's not the swiftest thing on two legs, why does her excuse have to make sense, sometimes players do dumb shit and really can't explain why.
She just made an emotional call on the turn and it worked out.
If he had a better hand and she lost, no one cares.
It just happened to work.
Even a broken clock is right every once in a while.
Accusing someone of cheating is bad form unless you can prove it or at least have some evidence.
Probability on one hand isn't a smoking gun.
And I imagine if this was another man instead of a woman, Garrett would not say anything unless he had proof.
The fact that a woman beat him with a shit hand just has to mean she cheated, no woman is that good is the mindset here.
What is the most disconcerting about this entire event is that Garrett coerced her into giving him the money back. Even if she offered to give the money back he should not have taken it back until a complete investigation was done. She won the hand fair and square. There doesn't appear to be any evidence of any kind of cheating and Garrett is not judge jury and executioner. Casino security or the man in the cowboy hat should have summoned the police and they should have arrested Garrett for theft. Theft by coercion. He cannot steal her money. In that moment she may be under duress or vulnerable? Garrett has issues. He should have said "nice hand. You caught me bluffing".
King simp right here. Everyone with a brain knows she cheated. You dont make that call, you lose to most bluffs. She gave the money back because she felt guilt. You also need to look up the defenition of theft. Voluntarily handing over money is not it bud.
Anon…exactly how did she cheat. Turns out she wants to save herself by not getting uninvited to future poker play, and, she wanted Garrett to not leave, which like a sore loser he was ready to leave. Under those 2 terms she gave half of pot back to him. Garret stealing the $, no, so yeah yer correct about that. But again, exactly how did she cheat?? She thought he was pushing her. She pushed back, if she misread her hand or not. She won, 100% fair and square.
Even if she originally misread her hand, after Garrett went all in, she looked at her hole cards for a good 10 seconds. How do you stare at a 4 for over 10 seconds and think it's a 3!
Agreed 100% she checked her cards before calling and she even said she didn't have 3 before opening her cards. I believe she cheated.
You can actually see her saying “ I have a bluff catcher” and for Garret to be such a sour looser this hand and this situation is going to hunt him down for the rest of his life.
Bro but what bluffs does she beat besides 87o or 87cc. It just bothers me after the pot she acts like she soul read owned Garret & obviously very nervous but can’t tell if it’s from her fishy play or being embarrassed she somehow won
It’s because she thought she had J3 supposedly, so yes, it is a bluff catcher.
But you can hear her saying that she had a bluff catcher. And as well just do the math and see how manny outs Garret had on the turn, 20 I think. If Garret would have won the pot he would have never complain about her calling his all in. Now do you think he was going to say “you lost the pot on the river let me return the money to you”
sorry, but her saying she had a bluff catcher only puts more blood on her hands, not less. the dupers delight/deceptive grin before she even called shows that she knows it's going to look bad when everyone sees her hand. note her pre-emptively mitigating the blowback by defending her call before she makes it because she knows the blowback is going to be strong the moment she turns her hand face up. that's also the reason it takes her so long to actually turn them up. she knew her hand was good, and she was slightly ashamed to have done what she did. when people make legitimate extremely strong calls on others who are bluffing, they are proud to turn it up and show everyone they knew the person was bluffing. she couldn't pass up the opportunity, but could sense the outrage that was coming.. her giving the money back (when has anyone ever done this willingly?) supports this and only makes it worse for her.
also, her hand isn't what most would consider a bluff catcher. typically, the minimum strength hand referred to a bluff catcher would be at least K/A high. that his hand was one of the ONLY hands that her hand was a bluff catcher against paints her into a corner for having said "but i have a bluff catcher" rather than getting her out of it.
He got outplayed! If he coerced her to give back what she won, that's strong-arm robbery and he should be charged and serve prison time if he's guilty.
Considering a guy who can see the cards live got arrested for stealing, I would say there was something crooked going on.
So he's a thief that was caught thieving from his partner in crime? That's a huge stretch
She didn’t cheat you guys, shes clearly just a huge WHALE, when asked why she called, she said I had blockers LMAO, but she blocks bluffs, but probably heard somewhere it’s good to call when you have blockers, and also she had a strong feeling Gareth was bluffing
Unless She knows Garrett’s Cards somehow and knows that Jack blocks Some of Garrett’s outs!
They should have checked her for any devices right there on the spot. Although it’s wrong it sure would’ve ended all of the cheating accusations
Hustler Casino should have immediately gone to the booth where the one person who can see the cards live was working and secure the area. This was potentially a 125k attempted theft. HCL dropped the ball.
This was, by far, one of the strangest hands I have ever seen. When she rolled her hand I feel like she felt like the table was going to explode and everyone was going to be like “ohhhhh shiiiiit!!!” but it was just a little awkward as everyone tried to process what the hell just happened. Garrett’s all in is great because he will get folds from better hands (small pairs, even over pairs, better flush draws). He has an open ended straight flush draw. Even if he gets called by a 10 (which will happen sometimes) he still has a ton of outs. That all in folds out better hands than J4o lol. I think it was great shove and a dumb call. Garrett does that for value with hands like A10 to cooler worse 10s. She 100% did NOT misread her hand because she checked her hand like 15 seconds before she called. She also said when she asked Garrett what would make him feel better about it, he said to split it. She just gave it all back to him. Andy asked her why she gave it all back and she said “I don’t know”.
she did an interview on the livestream and said much more than that. nice reporting tho, cnn
She responded with much more than "I don't know" c'mon man. Literally an entire explanation at the end.
@@maticus286 I am referring to right when she got back to the table and they were all talking about it. Andy asked her “why did you give it all back to him and she said “I don’t know”. What she said during the interview contradicted this response lol.
She got intimidate to give back the money.
GARRET PAY HER MONEY BACK, YOU LOST THE GAME.
Garrett is a gentleman. He would never lie on social media. I believe every single word he says. And I honestly think she was cheating in some way.
She could have cheated however, the burden of innocence is not on her, the burden of proof is on the accuser. He didn’t prove anything.
I think it was a total donk call. She won by being dumb..
I think u have cheated in all your poker games also. Proof? Not required. My gut knows.
Who's the biggest sore loser?
Light Yagami (death note), Magnus Carlsen (chess), Garrett Adelstein (poker), Magnus Carlsen (chess960)
I’ve been in a hand like this and if the board is low and your opponent overbet shoves, he’s either got the nuts or a semi bluff with a draw. The most obvious draw is a straight. He probably doesn’t do this with Q, K, A or Pair plus because those have some showdown value. He’s is polarizing his hand. If he bets smaller, she folds. That sizing screams bluff with no showdown value or nuts and his behavior screamed bluff so she did nothing wrong. People are overreacting because of the dollar amount. If it was 1k at 5/10, people wouldn’t care but it’s a very smart play.
You are absolutely correct. It screams bluff........like Q-J for the open ended straight or A-K and I am still behind with jack high. She cheated badly.
So her J of clubs blocks his draws though. He can’t have KJ or QJ or AJ or clubs
@@joeltroughton3021 he probably value bets or checks since he’ll have show down value if he misses. This was clearly a bluff or nuts bet. She chose bluff.
@@holdemNE1 those hands you mentioned have value if he misses so why shove? If he bets smaller like for value, she folds. Betting to much is suspicious. She knew he had no value of winning if he misses his draw. People are only making a big deal because of the stakes
@@holdemNE1 you’d have more of a leg to stand on if this one at River but it was turn and he was polarizing his bet to say nuts or nothing. Those hands are not nothing. He had nothing but a draw. Zero value or nuts is what he was saying he had.
Great video! At first I thought for sure she cheated but after listening to her explain I believe her. Terrible poker players sometimes get it right.
She said "you did this to me so many times" that was the main reason she called. She always folds to his big bets and she knows he's always either bluffing or has an over card
Agreed. I feel like if she's cheating there, shoving over his 10k bet makes way more sense
But she didn’t get it right. She misread her hand. If she knew she had a 4, AND she made the call, then I would agree with your statement. Don’t give her credit for getting it right.
how would she even cheat? She's a wealthy donk, she has no incentive to cheat on a stream with an insane delay. Garrett should be ashamed he used his power dynamic to intimidate her and get his money back. He's a massive SJW and his biggest idol is Obama, too. Too bad it seems like it was all for show and he's a massive asshole.
@@BryantR100 how did she misread her hand? she literally said she didn't have a pair. The 3 only got brought up after she was confronted.
How did she cheat? She was not watching anything or had anything in her ears. She is just a nice lady and felt bad for the crying boy!!!
Yeah and she said she had flush draw too lol
She had a vibrate in her panties 😂
The biggest thing my argument would be (if she’s claiming she thinks she had a 3) is that she is looking at her hand and rechecking it over and over. She knows what she had, and there’s something fishy about her first remark.
How many times have we thought Garret had a buzzer in his pocket
Zero times
In Ass not pocket😂
They should not let him play there anymore. That is why RIP lost it. No way she could of cheated.
Rip lost it cause he was staking Robbi and wanted the money.
I interpreted his face after the she revealed her card as how did she cheat this hand. Looking around and all over her just to find a clue, a device, or a signal giver maybe?
Every last bit of my ability to analyze human behavior is telling me ONE THING. Every bit of my faith in the human race is telling me to believe another.
Garrett raised with nothing, lost with nothing, and then acted incredulous because he had to show that he had nothing. Kudos to Robbie for not being bullied.
I'm in love with that woman, she might be a saint actually. I think she is just that nice to people honestly.
She's just an incredibly insecure woman. Poor girl.
There isn’t a person on this freaking planet that would give another person $130,000 just for them to “chill out”. She 100% was cheating.
How did she cheat? Show the proof.
😂 you just broke man . People with millions in bankroll would give up 130K to smooth thinks over .. when we sold our restaurant we discounted 300K which was 10% off to make the deal..
@@Jeffersonokay You just wait for the “proof” like a fish 🐠
equity wise Garrett is still the favorite before the river. The call was basically hoping to take the invested money back, in the long-run it's still just a chop.
Last comment from me: After she called, Garrett smiled…the thought of losing the money wasn’t a problem to him…being cheated was. Garrett should have left the game if he thought it was a dirty game
he did
I want to hear what Phil Ivey has to say about this entire sequence 🤓
Phil said he thought the hand was legit.
he'll say she didnt cheat because someone else gave her the information about garretts hand.
@@bonethirsty how so?
Phil was like these MoFo’s are crazy
Just like Lux said for these players $100k bet is like us betting $1k
What I think happened is she misread her hand, and when she happened to win results wise she turned that into she made a sick hero call. If she lost or even chopped I’d bet she’d likely be emphasizing how she misread her hand and thought she had a 3. She ran with the attention of making a sick call with jack high.
That make sense
She looked at her hand plenty. The whole thing is weird. I doubt she cheated, just incompetent.
THEN WHY WOULD SHE GIVE BACK THE MONEY
Exactly...she checked her cards right before she asked if her 3 was good. She could have a device that reads RFID and vibrates to indicate if she is still ahead
@@sslaw6 because garret was trying to intimidate her.
Regardless of her terrible reasoning, the actions of her ‘business partner’ is literally proof of coercion and his / their little plan not working and getting rumbled. Innocent people don’t react like that.
I admit that there’s a lot of awkwardly implausible moments that she even herself can't explain but what I’m really confused with is suppose she committed a cheating, how on earth could she possibly cheat when she’s given in a flip-a-coin situation. I mean, I can’t really make sense of it. If I were in her shoes, I’d definitely pull off that cheating skills when the situation is more stacked in favor of me. I was just wondering…
Eric
read garret's tweets. it explains a lot more about how it makes sense to be cheating in this scenario.
@Bobby Dillon Now that I can make much more sense of it, thanks to your well-thought-out account. Thanks!:)
@@aark89 Definitely, I will !! Thx
@Bobby Dillon He is her backer, stakes her at low level games, so makes sense hes staking her at this game too. Some people have also said they have a thing going on, but shes married so idk about that one.
Garrett was quiet for that moments because he was rethinking the hand
:Robbi to Garrett after winning the hand, “You look like you want to kill me.”
No cheat has ever given the money back.
She felt embarrassed with her play and intimidated by Garrets behaviour.
No honest person would give the money back. She felt caught.
Yep, 100%. AFter you rewatch it a few times, you find that her story crumbes too.
SHe says she thought that Garrett only had Ace high, and says her J of cubs provided blockers.
SO why would you call an all in when you're quite far behind against ace high?
Her hand, in of itself at this point only really has good value if Garrett has 3-5 unsuited. SO really, at best she is hoping for a very marginal spot. At worst she's already drawing dead.
SHe cheated. And you can see Garrett's eyes narrow immediately afterwards. Normally he would just say, "good hand" etc, but he knows, and his mind is working
Either Robbi made a VERY questionable call or she knew what Garrett had. That’s it. Bothers me that she had a “business partner” at the table? What’s up with that? Then when she gave the money back, it looked REALLY bad for her. The story about “preserving production value”? What? She looks really bad. Agree that Garrett shouldn’t have taken the money back. I believe that was a mistake, but understand if he thought he was cheated and it belonged to him.
A cheater wouldn't give the money back. They would keep it, they are cheaters. An embarrassed person who is out of their element and is facing the crowd favorite, on camera with thousands of eyes on, could feel pressured by the situation to give it back and play peace maker.
Not only that, but she admitted on joeyIngrams UA-cam show that he was backing her in this game. It was rips money she was playing w, that’s why he was butthurt when she gave it back.
I was looking for this to did she se his card but if you look Garett did protect his cards very good and she couldn’t se his cards ,even if you se his cards and you know what he have I don’t think anybody would call in that case to,Garett have huge advantage to win this hand anyway
In high stakes games this is common practice, rip had 50%
@@MikeySmithJones that depends on the personality. Some cheaters would give the money back, others wouldn't
Her business partner is on it with her playing the same table, and the way he freaked out is a blatant evidence of making an excuse for an exit but lucky for them Garrett left first.,
Yes I agree some cheating (appended
Yeah that will hold up in court…
If that was your friend I would think you would be mad
I’ve been in the CIA reading body language for 27 years. Looking at ONLY body language, she completely picked him apart and must have had some idea that he was bluffing. Garrett is a baby, and he completely lost my respect.
But he wasn't bluffing? He had a decent hand.
She's a cheat. 110%
@@martinmoodie9545 pretty sure they are bluffing
Yes he was semi bluffing with a straight flush draw, but she had no reason to be in that hand preflop and post flop… And definitely no reason to be calling an all in with J4.. Not saying that she was cheating, but in poker, that’s just stoopid call. 99% of the time you’ll lose that gamble. Henceforth the debate of dumb luck / cheating.
I’m FBI and I agree!!!!
Another important point missed by everyone. Mathematically Garrett is favored to win at that point before the river. I'd take those odds any day.
Innocent until proven guilty but damn I gotta say I lean Garrett's side. Why would you ever give the money back if you won the hand in a legit sense. Knowing full well it would look suspicious to the public? It's all a bit odd...
she made it quite clear she didnt care what others thought about giving back the $ , just wanted to avoid drama
the public 🤣🤣
Why would a cheater who was successful, with no obvious proof of them cheating, give the money back? That makes even less sense. However, someone out of their element, under 20k eyes through a camera, against the crowd favorite could feel pressured by the situation to pay it back. Think!
Many people do not care about money... It is a lot of money to me but she may put no value on the money.
I don’t know how she could’ve been cheating.
if someone gave information (via) Someone on livestream or RFID hack.
Everyone said the same thing about Postle. No one ever proved anything about him…
@@mjriemen they showed him looking at his phone. This chick had skin tight pants and no phone lol
I strongly do not feel that she cheated. I also believe that the bluff Garrett pulled on Andy the night before had a lot to do with it. Robbi decided she would not be bullied, she had been calling light to Garrett's big bets all night long. If Garrett had realized his equity and won that hand the narrative of the hand would be completely different. But Garrett is not supposed to lose, right?
Exactly!
Unless he's playing against Phil Hellmuth
If this is true he should give money back. That’s a ton of money. Life changing money.
@@JohnSmith-cz3us He definitely should give her back her money. Him taking back the money is an indictment against HCL which is an indictment against himself since he's by far the most successful player on HCL.
Since misreading your hand isn't Cheating, just poor play, how do people feel she cheated ? I don't get the cheating accusation.
Garrett was like wtf in the world is going on…
he's thinking i always bluff them off their hands.
Looks like Garret owes her $133k lol
I think she just didn’t want to say she misread her hand because she was embarrassed
I agree
Roughly 4:30-4:36. Isn't she asked, "Do you have a 3?", to which she answers, "no" ?
Lol it's Poker I have said it all
I got it didn't have IT....
I GOT nothing had IT....
NO answer at all...
This should not be a discussion I'm not explaining why I call or bet..
Don't ask for $$$$$ bacc
Not giving $$$$$ back
She looked at her cards for over 10 seconds before calling.