Considering that stitching of photos is a mathematical-computational algorithm, the baseline should be gyroscope, accelerometer, A-GPS as reference-point of every camera and its sensor... with triangulation like Lidar, radar, architectural tools... the establishment of reference point for positional-sensors to report its position and use that reference to stitch photos instead of depending on the photo to stitch photo... maybe you are right about samsung being able to include all that in a single phone with women swinging arms in public like chimpanzees as a consequence Interlaced mpeg video at lowered resolutions can capture reverse-paint canvas... especially with a 3G or 4G mobile hotspot router as an additional reference to 5G A-GPS for increased-precision positional-reference-point
@@Lancea1ot4k, assuming an even 4000 pixels of image width (which often varies up or down depending on camera model), would be about 10-12 megapixels at conventional digital camera sensor dimensions of 4:3 to 3:2. 8MP at 4k assumes an image height of 500 pixels, and I don’t think 8:1 is a very common image aspect ratio. Bad math.
@@firstletterofthealphabet7308 a 16x9 aspect ratio 4k is exactly 8,294,400 pixels, or 8 mp. For videos we use resolution names like 4k but for stills we use mp. most stills are 4:3 and video 16:9
My uncle, a photography professor, once created the world's biggest film camera, converting an old aircraft hangar into a working camera. This one is far more complicated.
Problem with air hangar is that its quite hard to move around. But I have seen a van converted to camera. A lot smaller but you can actually take that one with you on travels :) Anyway, would love to see results.
@Hates Spam christ mate all I said was it's a fast read out speed 😂sitting here acting like I've just said the most outrageous thing you've ever heard. No need to write me an essay either, clearly none of us could ever be on par with your level of technological genius. Neek
If you stitch together 32 - 100 megapixel images from a medium format camera you’d have the same resolution. I get I’m comparing apples to oranges here but I was excepting much higher like 32000. Still very impressive
@Hates Spam welcome to planet earth, strange little alien. Here we tend to use a little thing called a hyperbole to exaggerate certain emotions in a given sentence. This hyperbole isnt representative of the person's actual emotions but rather a tool to communicate ones emotions to another person more effectively. They are not to be taken at face value. Please enjoy the rest of your stay on planet earth and familiarize yourself with our languages and ways of speaking.
I though he was going to say 168 thousand and I was thinking. “Cheaper than I expected.” But then I heard million and was like, “yep, makes sense, no surprised at all…” 😂😆
SmartPhone is something which u can carry with yourself in pocket or wherever you go & for the size of this camera you'll need to ask some mad medical scientists to invent something which could make you 5× taller,stronger then maybe 🤣
Making a timelaspe of the night sky is basically how the Greeks found out that some of the stars are actually planets. Kepler basically does time lapses of individual star systems. So called timelaspes have always been a powerful tool when it comes to space research, this is just the most modern and large scale example of it.
This is an achievement on a scale of astronomical proportions and the people involved deserve many congrats. Looking forward to see the hopefully unedited results it's said to deliver. Hm.. *ponders* I wonder which weighs more, the camera or the amount of money used to create it..
Here is our mass estimate as of October 2021; 2,946.8kg; this value is slightly outdated now but it is close. This has been a fun but very challenging project.
Back in the old days(60 years ago), a friend worked in remote sensing, when they used film, BIG film. He told a story of a couple "clever" technicians. The films was measured in feet. So they could resolve very fine (almost microscopic) detail. They took pictures of money of various countries. Tweaked the film images and printed their own. Apparently bags of it. It was very convincing back in the day. They got caught when one of them bought a very expensive car, for "cash." Far above their salaries.
you can't. JWST is completely different. and this one is completely different too. You can't compare apples to oranges. There are things that JWST can do better but LSST can't, but there's also LSST can do better but JWST can't.
Camera is impressively huge. Cant wait to see what it will unfold and provide us in the realms of science. We may even be able to locate the Time Variance Authority :p .
I remember when I was a kid, my family bought a 1 megapixel camera, when having a phone camera >2 megapixel was impressive and cutting edge. It's amazing to see how far technology has come in my life
You know it makes me feel better for the sake of the specie to hear from these guys, I can kick back and watch em explain the universe to everyone that's curious about it aka literally erryone, truly powerful stuff
Hopefully it has great auto focus. I hear the rolling shutter is really bad on this thing. Luckily, it's mirrorless so will be able to adapt my old Canon glass.
Yup, our E2V CCDs were made in the UK. The ITL CCDs were made in Arizona. The housing for the CCDs has a thermal expansion coefficient similar to invar but has a thermal conductivity similar to aluminum. Our Grid and Sensor Base Plates have the same properties. It is amazing material.
Wait I'm confused. This thing seems to be better for macro shots. It's extremely impressive it can see a golfball from 15 miles away, but that's not very far for space. So I'm assuming it's going to be attached to a telescope and I just missed something in the video? Lol
I am curious to know how this can take pictures through our atmosphere which was why hubble and James web were placed above the atmosphere and L2 orbit.
The focal length is much shorter so the distortion isn’t as important. They also still have optical correction for atmospheric distortion using actuators on the mirrors.
Question is, what kind of processor they use? I’m interested to know. Large sensor and high megapixel means they have big data to work with which requires high processing power. I wonder how long it takes to process one single image tho. I wonder if they’re standard compression images or RAW
they built a "green" datacenter,in another country and a dedicated super high speed fiber connection to download the datas, it ll be terabytes of datas every night
Awesome telescope and camera...the biggest problem is how to subtract all of the satellites (especially Starlink) that will be photographed every night.
Rumors suggest that the upcoming Galaxy S23 Ultra will have this as its telephoto camera.
🤣🤣🤣🤣nice one
a camera with a phone mounted to it
🤣
Considering that stitching of photos is a mathematical-computational algorithm, the baseline should be gyroscope, accelerometer, A-GPS as reference-point of every camera and its sensor... with triangulation like Lidar, radar, architectural tools... the establishment of reference point for positional-sensors to report its position and use that reference to stitch photos instead of depending on the photo to stitch photo... maybe you are right about samsung being able to include all that in a single phone with women swinging arms in public like chimpanzees as a consequence
Interlaced mpeg video at lowered resolutions can capture reverse-paint canvas... especially with a 3G or 4G mobile hotspot router as an additional reference to 5G A-GPS for increased-precision positional-reference-point
😂😅🎉
Takes "caught in 4k" to a whole new level.
4k is about 8 megapixels, so, yea
in the case of the observatory it would be "caught in 56K" 😄
@@lrklein2422 56k is the speed of dialup internet.
@@Lancea1ot4k, assuming an even 4000 pixels of image width (which often varies up or down depending on camera model), would be about 10-12 megapixels at conventional digital camera sensor dimensions of 4:3 to 3:2. 8MP at 4k assumes an image height of 500 pixels, and I don’t think 8:1 is a very common image aspect ratio.
Bad math.
@@firstletterofthealphabet7308 a 16x9 aspect ratio 4k is exactly 8,294,400 pixels, or 8 mp. For videos we use resolution names like 4k but for stills we use mp. most stills are 4:3 and video 16:9
My uncle, a photography professor, once created the world's biggest film camera, converting an old aircraft hangar into a working camera. This one is far more complicated.
That's really cool! Is there anywhere that covers it?
@@rickw7522 link?
thats incredible
Hey that's awesome! I read about this over a decade ago, now. It was in the Guinness records book too, I believe.
Problem with air hangar is that its quite hard to move around. But I have seen a van converted to camera. A lot smaller but you can actually take that one with you on travels :) Anyway, would love to see results.
I can't be the only one absolutely gobsmacked at the fact this thing reads a 3,200 Megapixel 15 second long exposure in just 2 seconds
@Hates Spam boy you sound like a miserable person
@Hates Spam christ mate all I said was it's a fast read out speed 😂sitting here acting like I've just said the most outrageous thing you've ever heard. No need to write me an essay either, clearly none of us could ever be on par with your level of technological genius. Neek
@Hates Spam relax Freshman Philosopher
If you stitch together 32 - 100 megapixel images from a medium format camera you’d have the same resolution. I get I’m comparing apples to oranges here but I was excepting much higher like 32000. Still very impressive
@Hates Spam welcome to planet earth, strange little alien.
Here we tend to use a little thing called a hyperbole to exaggerate certain emotions in a given sentence. This hyperbole isnt representative of the person's actual emotions but rather a tool to communicate ones emotions to another person more effectively. They are not to be taken at face value.
Please enjoy the rest of your stay on planet earth and familiarize yourself with our languages and ways of speaking.
perfect. i want this as my webcam
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
What’s the min focus distance?
in my phone
social media image compression will still ruin it.
You really want everybody on tik tok to be able to see the nastiness of your skin pores?
I though he was going to say 168 thousand and I was thinking. “Cheaper than I expected.” But then I heard million and was like, “yep, makes sense, no surprised at all…” 😂😆
Same😂
Same lol
same! ☔
That’s alright now i want engineers to fit this in my phone
2050 for sure
SmartPhone is something which u can carry with yourself in pocket or wherever you go & for the size of this camera you'll need to ask some mad medical scientists to invent something which could make you 5× taller,stronger then maybe 🤣
@@ironstar_2453 James Webb's focal length is 131 meters. What you said is true, I just really like that fact.
@@Speedplanet281 lowkey tho
Hopefully someday they can fit this amount of megapixels without too much noise
Finally someone decided to make a time-lapse in space.
Making a timelaspe of the night sky is basically how the Greeks found out that some of the stars are actually planets. Kepler basically does time lapses of individual star systems. So called timelaspes have always been a powerful tool when it comes to space research, this is just the most modern and large scale example of it.
but dont excpect something like the simulation they show, with, galaxies colliding and everything.
@@telemaq76 That would be the longest time lapse ever. Hundreds of millions of years (at least)!
@@Chris-io2cs lol yeah SUUUURE buddy. You should probably check my "Venus" footages.
This is an achievement on a scale of astronomical proportions and the people involved deserve many congrats. Looking forward to see the hopefully unedited results it's said to deliver. Hm.. *ponders* I wonder which weighs more, the camera or the amount of money used to create it..
3,800lbs in 100’s or 370,000lbs in 1’s, For some reason, I’d guess closer to the former
Here is our mass estimate as of October 2021; 2,946.8kg; this value is slightly outdated now but it is close. This has been a fun but very challenging project.
Astronomical proportions... i see what you did there.
Money well spent instead of weapons of mass destruction.
3.2 GIGAPIXELS?!? Great Scott!
Still can’t get a clear photo of Bigfoot
Vibration Reduction my friend 😉
Rumor has it Bigfoot was born blurry
Or god
Back in the old days(60 years ago), a friend worked in remote sensing, when they used film, BIG film. He told a story of a couple "clever" technicians. The films was measured in feet. So they could resolve very fine (almost microscopic) detail. They took pictures of money of various countries. Tweaked the film images and printed their own. Apparently bags of it. It was very convincing back in the day. They got caught when one of them bought a very expensive car, for "cash." Far above their salaries.
Toppled over because someone got too comfortable
@@kingding9542 because fake story
I'd like to see a lens that big being created
Physics Girl made a video of it 3 years ago being made
The group of scientists should take their selfie for another world records!
for anybody after decade from now,
I hope this thing really changes the life of humanity for the better 💚
What a beautiful work. Modern scientists may be called artists.
not all of them. In fact most of them are insane and quite ignorant
Now make a huge optical telescope proportionate to this camera and attach this camera to the eye piece of that telesecope
🙂
I'm working in the LSST project
Would've loved to hear how this would compare the JWST despite James being Infrared and LSST being optical
you can't. JWST is completely different. and this one is completely different too. You can't compare apples to oranges.
There are things that JWST can do better but LSST can't, but there's also LSST can do better but JWST can't.
@@iamwisdomsky that is literally what comparing is. drawing the strengths of each camera and the weaknesses of each camera is a comparison you dingus
Who's come here after watch Dhruv Rathi video short
He is a liar and a propagandist.
Usne tere sath kya kiya @@markpatel
That'll definately Revolutionize Zoom Calls.
Camera is impressively huge. Cant wait to see what it will unfold and provide us in the realms of science. We may even be able to locate the Time Variance Authority :p .
Thank god they need to answer for their crimes for this worst possible timeline they aren’t pruning
I remember when I was a kid, my family bought a 1 megapixel camera, when having a phone camera >2 megapixel was impressive and cutting edge. It's amazing to see how far technology has come in my life
How old are you ?
@@dman1479 clearly more then 20
@@dman1479 3 days
Will this setup be ideal for live streaming on Twitch? Does it need some sort of cable?
I'm interested.
Lmao
Idk why but I didn’t expect it to actually look like a massive camera. That shutter could cut a person in half
4:26 „starry-eyed“ very nice xD
as a Chilean i'm very anxious to see this working!
Ok, I'm buying the 2nd one that you guys make because my D850 isn't doing any justice.
I look forward to nerdier/more technical youtube channels to break down stuff like the focal length and the hardware that translates the images
When I was growing up, what we now know to just be our galaxy, used to be called our entire universe. Pretty crazy.
are you over 100 years old?
Great, I need this camera in my phone.
Insane how this thing will map the entire sky in the span of 10years; mapping 20TB of data each night
At first when I saw the lens, I thought this was a black spoof comedy sketch showing us big SLR lens! Buts it’s for real real!
i like that it is a actual camera and not some other sort of image generator
You know it makes me feel better for the sake of the specie to hear from these guys, I can kick back and watch em explain the universe to everyone that's curious about it aka literally erryone, truly powerful stuff
My store need That for Security Camera!
bro got caught in ∞ 💀💀💀
It sounds really cool. What I'd like to know though, was the Golfball a Titleist or TaylorMade ? 🙂
The images are ~56,560 x 56,560 pixels in case anyone was wondering (assuming a 1:1 aspect ratio).
Lol the file storage must be insane 🤣
the fact that this thing saves an image within 2 second is wild.
aliens be like: haha 3.2 Gigapixels lol.
I'm gonna show this to my grandkids when u tell them how big Gigapixel cameras were back in my day...
Great video
Finally, the camera I need to go birdwatching.
Planet Earth making a video call with space.
I'm excited to take more 3.2 Gigapixel photos of broccoli
Gonna use this for when a school fight happens next time
It’s a Time Machine. We can see the past of the universe what have happened. ❤
Hopefully it has great auto focus. I hear the rolling shutter is really bad on this thing. Luckily, it's mirrorless so will be able to adapt my old Canon glass.
You may need an adapter. 😂
@@jamestheredd Will have to wait a while for a battery grip though 🤣
It would take that thing to spin so fast to have a bad rolling shutter
Thanks for sharing and good to see where the sensors made in the UK end up. Not often this is seen.
Yup, our E2V CCDs were made in the UK. The ITL CCDs were made in Arizona. The housing for the CCDs has a thermal expansion coefficient similar to invar but has a thermal conductivity similar to aluminum. Our Grid and Sensor Base Plates have the same properties. It is amazing material.
Wait I'm confused. This thing seems to be better for macro shots. It's extremely impressive it can see a golfball from 15 miles away, but that's not very far for space. So I'm assuming it's going to be attached to a telescope and I just missed something in the video? Lol
Bro… think about how massive a star is relative to a golf ball
@@sneakymilkman4203 you’ve never used a telescope have you
@@KCJbomberFTW Not even the best telescope with the best tracking available could have prevented the joke from flying over your head at mach 12
@@tatzecom it’s not a joke if your just wrong about how this works and what it’s used for
Good enough for galaxies and wide field images. Which are more useful for discovering new things.
I'm going to need this for Photography courses!
Finally a good enough lens to capture clear footage of UFO 😂✌🏽
Does it come in E-mount?
man, i cant wait to check all the pictures this camera will be taking...
cnet: Digital Camera Takes 3,200 Megapixel
*my eyes have quitted the chat*
I am curious to know how this can take pictures through our atmosphere which was why hubble and James web were placed above the atmosphere and L2 orbit.
The focal length is much shorter so the distortion isn’t as important.
They also still have optical correction for atmospheric distortion using actuators on the mirrors.
Lasers. You can see how the atmospher distorts a couple of lasers and correct for it. At least this is how the LBT in AZ does it FWIR.
The fact that we can make this but not good dashcams that can read a license plate or security cameras that can show a face.
this would be a perfect, travel, and street photography camera.
Whys my guy look like discount linus with the whole gettup😂😂😂😂
I wonder does it shot JPEG or RAW? 😂😂😂😂 let me add this to my wish list lol
Lol
Time exposures will also detect any NEOs extremely easy. Thats what I think its real purpose is.
OMG, the shutter looks more like a garage door than a shutter!
Samsung be like:- heh 2 decades and that big camera look at our camera it fits in our pockets 😂
It was about DAMN TIME!!!!!
Sounds like I can finally join the Dpick gang! 😄
Chris' Nolan' next blockbuster is gonna need a bigger screen than IMAX
perfect. i want this as my phone cam 😅
Sounds like they are releasing the RAW files lol. That is what I am excited about
Amazing stuff here❤
Question is, what kind of processor they use? I’m interested to know. Large sensor and high megapixel means they have big data to work with which requires high processing power. I wonder how long it takes to process one single image tho. I wonder if they’re standard compression images or RAW
It's scientific research not Bob's photo gallery, they're using supercomputers and processing all the data coming from the sensors, every pixel.
probably an arduino /s
they built a "green" datacenter,in another country and a dedicated super high speed fiber connection to download the datas, it ll be terabytes of datas every night
James webb is like hold my rocket, let me show them
One day, this will be stuck to your phone 🤣
It’s kinda comical how big it is 😂
Finally a worthy camera for UFO sightings, no more low quality clips and shots
Is there a RF Adapter for that lens?
That's awesome
3.200 MP camera: exists
Samsung: Hey, hey!
In the future that camera will be just as big as the size of my thumb carrying a 3,200 mp camera with just a single hand.
Awesome telescope and camera...the biggest problem is how to subtract all of the satellites (especially Starlink) that will be photographed every night.
Watch this somehow arrive on phone cameras in a couple years
Finally a decent selfie camera
Can they make that 3D model into a VR video game PLEASE.
Handy for taking selfies.
Jim: Hey cool lab suit man! You work for Tyvek?
Joe: No man..thats just what they do to all their products...ALL OF THEM!
Is the available in E -Mount?
I hope it take great photos during night specially manages noise level at its best. Also I'm wondering what all other lens option do we have.
I strongly suspect, all the photos will be at night.
@@badhombre4942 pretty safe assumption lol
Good luck on using a swab stick when cleaning up those sensor 😆
that's amazing. Thank you for the video.
Great news and I am eagerly waiting for a great shot of the Apollo 11 landing site 😃
and when they find universe is made of popcorn. I'll eat the entire universe for free.
Is the lens made of glass, and if so what kind, and what are its limits of transparency wavelengths in nanometers, or Angstroms for those as old as I.
The bandpass is for 320-1050 nm
@@Doctor_Yuri : Thanks. So deep Violet, very edge of visable, to past visible red, and 40% of the way into "near infrared".
The LSST telescope will be using mirrors, the glass element we see are some kind of additionnal correctors
Why not say 3.2 Gigapixel?
When I win the lottery I'ma buy this and just take Pictures of Food and Dogs
Attach some rockets to it and we don’t need astronauts lmao
Best camera for UA-cam 😄
National Geographic photographer bringing the small camera
The camera:
The wet dream of every smartphone company.
In 5 years this will be in my pocket.