The 5 Deadliest Russian Navy Warships | Russian Destroyer And Frigate

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 чер 2024
  • The 5 Deadliest Warships from the Russian Navy - The Russian Federation inherited a substantial naval force from its Soviet predecessor, particularly from the decades following the Cuban Missile Crisis that saw a spurt in Soviet naval investment. But large swathes of these vessels fell into disrepair over the 1990’s from a lack of maintenance and resources.
    Several of Russia’s hottest current conflict zones, including the Baltic region and more recently the Azov Sea, are naval in nature. The Kremlin has therefore become increasingly focused on modernizing its navy with cost-effective, export-driven innovation on the one hand and iterative adaptation of present technologies on the other.
    The result are flagships and first-class vessels that, while not without their technical challenges, can possess significant naval threat capabilities. Here are five of the most dangerous russian warship.
    Subscribe Now :
    / @military-tv
    Facebook: / usmilitarynewsvideos
    Instagram: / militaryvideos_
    Twitter:
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 312

  • @bobberschannel6715
    @bobberschannel6715 2 роки тому +18

    Update the moskwa is out of the game ✌️😁

  • @paulmccormack5524
    @paulmccormack5524 3 роки тому +103

    The Battle Cruiser Kirov is beautiful ship.

  • @agentepolaris4914
    @agentepolaris4914 3 роки тому +155

    I love how the Russian Warships still look like the classic Warships, very sexy machines. Unlike those ugly box-like destroyers the USA has.

    • @menon_ji4984
      @menon_ji4984 3 роки тому +14

      Especially their missile cruiser

    • @TheZimbeatz
      @TheZimbeatz 3 роки тому +14

      They still cant take on the U.S Navy.. Don't kid yourself

    • @alexzaragoza1388
      @alexzaragoza1388 3 роки тому +21

      No hate fam but those ugly box-like destroyers can destroy the old USSR ships anytime, That's why Russian's are modernizing them to get rid of the old destroyers and frigates.

    • @sheilamatinek5356
      @sheilamatinek5356 3 роки тому +10

      @@TheZimbeatz the US NAVY is like a sitting duck in a wide open field bata...

    • @cooliod45
      @cooliod45 3 роки тому +18

      @@sheilamatinek5356 let's not kid ourselves... the US owns the oceans.

  • @denverchin44
    @denverchin44 2 роки тому +14

    One of these ships had sunk already at Ukraine war at Black Sea.

    • @salvationmokgatlhe
      @salvationmokgatlhe 2 роки тому

      Moskva it has been reported. It was according to Kiev, hit by two Neptune missiles and caught fire before it sank. The Kremlin version is that it suffered uncontained fire in the ammunition depot and it sank under bad weather while being towed.

  • @SuperDahalo
    @SuperDahalo 2 роки тому +21

    RIP Moskva. You will not be missed

    • @xaiano794
      @xaiano794 2 роки тому +3

      Rust in pieces LMAO

  • @vasilislianidakis1970
    @vasilislianidakis1970 2 роки тому +10

    moskva is the deadliest ship for plankton at the bottom of the sea....

    • @HATCH5T
      @HATCH5T 2 роки тому

      Well is there any Ukranian navy leftM

  • @Ryan_Christopher
    @Ryan_Christopher 2 роки тому +12

    Goodbye Moskva!

  • @IanPatton
    @IanPatton 2 роки тому +4

    One down, four to go.

  • @ivanchernobyl3769
    @ivanchernobyl3769 2 роки тому +6

    It's amazing how deadly these Russian ships are for their crew serving on them. They turn into submarines so quick.
    That is after being confronted by a country that doesn't even have a Navy. They turn into submarines

    • @soviet_union1936
      @soviet_union1936 9 місяців тому

      Hiw woukd ur precuous ukraine do. If nato wasnt there to walk for you

  • @JoaoVictor-nl5gp
    @JoaoVictor-nl5gp 2 роки тому +7

    2:00 lol not so powerful anymore!

  • @user-en1mj8uc5f
    @user-en1mj8uc5f 3 роки тому +8

    I remember seeing a destroyer in WoWs that has 7 guns all lined up and ignoring the "design" factor when building the ship.
    It's a marvellous sight

  • @zr71offroad20
    @zr71offroad20 2 роки тому +7

    Kirov Class Battlecruisers are fascinating, this is what a modern battleship could look like if more navies were to continue their usage.

  • @damianeller6367
    @damianeller6367 Рік тому

    very interesting

  • @lykim6539
    @lykim6539 2 роки тому +5

    Russia knows how to build beautiful designs of ships.

    • @smithsanity2727
      @smithsanity2727 2 роки тому +1

      And fighter jets! They’re aircraft are beautiful as well. Their tanks and armored fighting vehicles… not so much. Well, the T-14 Armata and BMPT Terminator both look badass but their older T-72, T-80 & T-90 tanks are all quite unattractive. As well as their BMP-1, 2, 3, Kurganets-25, & their Tigr-M.

    • @aguy2763
      @aguy2763 27 днів тому

      @@smithsanity2727T-90M and T-80BVM look okay though.

  • @LegaRoSS
    @LegaRoSS 3 роки тому +3

    All P-500 aboard of all project 1164 was replaced by P-1000 in 2000s
    And im pretty much surprised there is no mentioning of Project 22350 which in my opinion is on par with 1164 cruiser in regards of firepower and after compilation of Zircon trials will surpass Slava class...
    Btw there are 20385 project corvette which is modernized 20380 with stronger weaponry which should have been mentioned instead of his elder brother (steregushy)

  • @danieljohnston7963
    @danieljohnston7963 2 роки тому +1

    This needs updating

  • @matheo4934
    @matheo4934 3 роки тому +29

    Damn these ships are massive!

    • @joshuaflores5741
      @joshuaflores5741 3 роки тому

      @Vladimir Putin No not really
      Big = Bigger Target

    • @joshuaflores5741
      @joshuaflores5741 3 роки тому

      @Vladimir Putin I think it wont be wise packing all the firepower in one ship if you define naval power by the power of these few ships since we know that Russia has a not so big of a navy. If this sinks, it goes along sinking with the potential of a navy winning battles. I'm not sure but I'm more fine with a spreading out of weapons doctrine 🙂

    • @jeansansterre6908
      @jeansansterre6908 3 роки тому

      More firepower

    • @jeansansterre6908
      @jeansansterre6908 3 роки тому

      @@joshuaflores5741 Kirov wa Made to destroy entire aernoval group

    • @AyOuB.God-soldier
      @AyOuB.God-soldier 2 роки тому

      @Vladimir Putin Hitler hhhhhhh

  • @Solstice4MNM
    @Solstice4MNM 3 роки тому +6

    Beautifully designed, elegant ships... but elderly.

  • @Ian-ke6yn
    @Ian-ke6yn 3 роки тому +10

    1:59. When i went out to sea fishing from Port Klang one time a decade ago on my uncle's boat, we pass by that ship as she sailed into the harbor. My God the sight was really impressive. And those Anti-Carrier missile silos are really something to be feared.
    Im not sure weather it can sink a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier but im very confident that if it gets into a shootout, the Carrier sailors will not be coming back home happy.

    • @stanislavlem5531
      @stanislavlem5531 3 роки тому +2

      i'm pretty sure that such class of ships got nuke warheads on their rocket systems, so it can sunk any targets or maybe even a group of targets

    • @reclusiarchgrimaldus1269
      @reclusiarchgrimaldus1269 2 роки тому

      Careful how you say his nane dude amen 🙏

    • @reclusiarchgrimaldus1269
      @reclusiarchgrimaldus1269 2 роки тому

      Read John 3:16 🙏

  • @es9382
    @es9382 2 роки тому +4

    RIP Moskva

  • @deba2701
    @deba2701 2 роки тому

    You didn't mention the newest Gorshkov class Frigates

  • @juleebaruah8480
    @juleebaruah8480 3 роки тому +2

    My most favorite, rf admiral ushakov

  • @keonecapan4742
    @keonecapan4742 2 роки тому

    The battlecruiser russian admiral nakhimov and pyotr so cool

  • @jasonsmith1143
    @jasonsmith1143 3 роки тому

    it's menacing!!

  • @charidmc5th359
    @charidmc5th359 3 роки тому +5

    มิตรภาพ​ 🇹🇭🤝🇷🇺

  • @Peter2meter
    @Peter2meter 3 роки тому

    No no no... Peter the great it is!

  • @noobieshunta
    @noobieshunta 2 роки тому +1

    You misspelled 4

  • @allgood6760
    @allgood6760 3 роки тому

    Awesome 👍

  • @darkmathsamport3694
    @darkmathsamport3694 3 роки тому +1

    Their ships has its own role in the sea...

  • @jacobgrumbridge4389
    @jacobgrumbridge4389 3 роки тому +1

    Had to comment t9 make it hundred

  • @ethanx2676
    @ethanx2676 3 роки тому +2

    Where's Smolensk?

  • @Perich29
    @Perich29 3 роки тому

    Farewell again our dear land, So hard for us to imagine that it's real and not a dream, motherland native home farewell our motherland, Lets go, the sea is waiting for us. the vastness of the sea is calling to us, and the tides.

  • @ramig4658
    @ramig4658 3 роки тому +1

    Did he say "Admiral knock him off !?

  • @georgenzioki
    @georgenzioki Рік тому

    Misisles range is key radar and weapons payloads.caps are key

  • @Central_Java_Softer
    @Central_Java_Softer 2 роки тому +1

    Kirov class is best battlecruiser in world

  • @suzannegoncalves9934
    @suzannegoncalves9934 3 роки тому +2

    👍

  • @frankrenda2519
    @frankrenda2519 3 роки тому +23

    that kirov missile cruiser could sink most of the usa carrier fleet.

  • @NJTDover
    @NJTDover 3 роки тому

    Like the info in the video. Unlike crappy videos about military power posted by pseudo desk experts, the narrator is very succinct by only describing the warships characteristics.

    • @thedictationofallah
      @thedictationofallah 2 роки тому

      he butchers the names. he puts corvettes on this list. and puts the kirov on number 5 spot

  • @sparknamoto1809
    @sparknamoto1809 2 роки тому +5

    And the moskov. Sunk by ukraine three days ago

  • @irishjanekarjfyurizma5029
    @irishjanekarjfyurizma5029 2 роки тому +1

    fun fact: russia was using old ship not like us there was uss zumwalt is so powerful

  • @thedictationofallah
    @thedictationofallah 2 роки тому

    why is the kirov class battlecruiser number 5? it should be number 1.

  • @congloiduong3197
    @congloiduong3197 3 роки тому +6

    Russia......😘😘😘😘😘

  • @georgenzioki
    @georgenzioki Рік тому

    Warships..

  • @rinipenjahitpenjahitoke522
    @rinipenjahitpenjahitoke522 3 роки тому +1

    waoww

  • @dapperfield595
    @dapperfield595 3 роки тому +3

    It’s only deadly if it isn’t on fire

  • @87267
    @87267 2 роки тому

    kirov vs yamato who will win?

  • @thedictationofallah
    @thedictationofallah 2 роки тому

    when corvettes are on this list 😂 😂

  • @jasonb4566
    @jasonb4566 2 роки тому +4

    Not anymore. Moksva sunk in Black sea by Ukraine. Can't even defend itself so this makes your analyst of Russian naval ships a bit laughable and quite wrong.

    • @NimbleBard48
      @NimbleBard48 2 роки тому +1

      I believe the official statement is that it is conducting a "special underwater operation".

  • @mikaels6009
    @mikaels6009 3 роки тому +4

    These western channels are putting me to sleep with the sane mentioning of funding and technical difficulties as if the USA hadn’t scrap destroyers and crashed aircraft!

  • @mracer8
    @mracer8 Рік тому +1

    only 4 now, Moskva is at bottom of Black sea where it make a nice home for fish

  • @soviet_union1936
    @soviet_union1936 9 місяців тому +2

    Cant wait for the ukranian military experts to flood the comment section

  • @bambangpriyo1722
    @bambangpriyo1722 3 роки тому +4

    Bang Putin...👍👍👍

  • @Ghostyfreaks
    @Ghostyfreaks 3 роки тому

    All Things DnD???

  • @AC-ri3qz
    @AC-ri3qz 3 роки тому +7

    These are war ships lots of fire power , we need to be allies with Russia 🇷🇺

    • @xSuperFryx
      @xSuperFryx 2 роки тому +2

      Not sure about that anymore they just lost one

  • @KairuinKorea
    @KairuinKorea 3 роки тому +3

    "Largest surface combatant ship in the world" I mean... apart from aircraft carriers lol? I mean, I think they still class as "surface combatants" lol?

  • @delightfulinsanity3622
    @delightfulinsanity3622 Рік тому +1

    Top 4*

  • @Overneed-Belkan-Witch
    @Overneed-Belkan-Witch 3 роки тому

    *Kirov Reporting*

  • @andrewjernigan799
    @andrewjernigan799 3 роки тому

    I wonder what 099 is in English

  • @alfasierra254
    @alfasierra254 3 роки тому +1

    Carrier killer?? Don't they realize it doesn't take other ships to kill carriers.

  • @agoraeuentendi1391
    @agoraeuentendi1391 2 роки тому

    Kirov ?

  • @RKarmaKill
    @RKarmaKill 2 роки тому +2

    Technically, Russia doesn't have aircraft carriers. They are classified as aircraft support heavy cruiser

    • @Chunkylover.
      @Chunkylover. 2 роки тому

      Kirov is usually made for sinking carriers and now Russia has a carrier sinking torpedo (Poseidon) it can even sunk a fleet, now. America is focused on building more carriers and Russia is building more Poseidon's in the same time making American carriers obsolete

    • @beastmode6225
      @beastmode6225 2 роки тому

      @@Chunkylover. advance radar detection anti submarine Jets will sink the submarines before they even get in range carrier fleets sre not unprotected it’s a whole battle groupe with destroyers guarding it. Kirov on the other hand is old outdated 1 well placed missile will ignite everything on board and blow it up

    • @Chunkylover.
      @Chunkylover. 2 роки тому

      @@beastmode6225 celebrate while tsircons are not placed on kirovs yet, carriers are obsolete my dear boy.

    • @beastmode6225
      @beastmode6225 2 роки тому

      @@Chunkylover. once hypersonic defense is masted all those middles are useless and Russia will hope and pray USA don’t attain hypersonic middles cause they don’t have a defense either

    • @Chunkylover.
      @Chunkylover. 2 роки тому

      @@beastmode6225 Russia took a decade or more to creat hypersonic weapons and they were the first to achieve it. And now Us just got started, once they've grasped hypersonic missiles it's too late Russia is still up ahead. Putin even announced it a month ago they've already have started to create a faster missile. And of course, Us still plays catch up. Tho it failed 4 times.

  • @lanceraphael7255
    @lanceraphael7255 3 роки тому

    Russia : *MY ocean territory*

  • @bigd5899
    @bigd5899 3 роки тому

    Why tf is everyone so damn toxic in the comments ? We dont give a fuck who you thinks would win a war.

  • @chrisrobichaud9529
    @chrisrobichaud9529 3 роки тому +2

    The United States has the best warplanes in the world!

  • @Defencesarkarijob
    @Defencesarkarijob 2 роки тому

    America Knows the power of Russia Navy ..Great navy

  • @chrestensrensen2486
    @chrestensrensen2486 Рік тому +1

    Oogh - It must be Emperor Putins Luxxuury yacht - all off them!! And his private luxuryforce Navy!!

  • @hifiresearch74
    @hifiresearch74 2 роки тому

    The Russian Fishing Equipment and Military Boat Plant thanks you for your comments on their technical mistakes. They will fix them in the next 10 years.😜

    • @Chunkylover.
      @Chunkylover. 2 роки тому

      Is dat a 100% percent true? Well, thanks for da information

    • @beastmode6225
      @beastmode6225 2 роки тому +1

      @@Chunkylover. yes their aircraft carrier has been broken and inoperable for years now the Russian navy is neglected

    • @Chunkylover.
      @Chunkylover. 2 роки тому

      @@beastmode6225 do you really think carriers are important to the Russian navy? They know soon they'll sit at the bottom of the ocean. Bet, no american carrier will set sale on Russian waters. Cause they know what'll happen to their beloved carriers/ocean reef.

    • @beastmode6225
      @beastmode6225 2 роки тому

      @@Chunkylover. Russia has always had a terrible naval reputation throughout history and they won’t need to get In Russian waters to pound out ground targets with long range air strikes like Russian fleet is doing to ukraine

    • @Chunkylover.
      @Chunkylover. 2 роки тому

      @@beastmode6225 have a good night and of course. Don't stop day dreaming.

  • @bangkithutajulu8851
    @bangkithutajulu8851 3 роки тому +1

    give it to the indonesia

  • @highgatehandyman6479
    @highgatehandyman6479 2 роки тому

    No Moskva, no carrier

  • @anwaribrahim3000
    @anwaribrahim3000 2 роки тому

    A power of Russian destroyer warship with weapons'&defense system in 0cean🚢👍💪🚀⚓📡♚☭🇷🇺🌏

  • @thecontinentalcontinental5671
    @thecontinentalcontinental5671 2 роки тому

    I am from malaysian..i was respect the russian battle equipment for army using for battle ..i am very respect the russian nuclear submarine class thypoon ..and also the any submarine from them..and russian airforce fighter jet ..on sukhoi 75 ..57 ..russian goverment not advertise what there have like europe country advertise of battle equipment..like us army...like malay call ..diam diam ubi berisi...and i think nato people very worry about russian battle equipment to eksport for other country..if any country want to have battle equipment must be approved by us and nato...and us was do the cattsa act..very shame for them

  • @theogangryscotsman7607
    @theogangryscotsman7607 2 роки тому +1

    Oh what yeah well the Four Four best Russian capital ships 😂🙈

  • @lastgleeming
    @lastgleeming 3 роки тому +1

    To be a great fighter you have to fight . To be a deadly ship you had to win a war or battle against an enemy . When has any of the 5 ships sunk another , or caused any death . ( self inflicted dies not count )

    • @nagyzoli
      @nagyzoli 3 роки тому

      That applies to any nation since WW2. None battled an all out skirmish with similarry armed nations. Bombing goat shepperds wielding AK47 is not really a test of skill.

    • @lastgleeming
      @lastgleeming 3 роки тому

      @@nagyzoli sorry just saw your comment .
      I don’t think your correct . Goat Shepard’s ?? Tell that to Iran that fought a 10 year plus war with Iraq . Iraq was the 6th largest military on the planet . The US annihilated Iraq in weeks . Not once but twice . Sunk the Iranian Navy a few years earlier .
      Again what are you talking about ?? Similarly armed? Since when did Russia’s rusting , junk yard , Frankenstein aircraft dragger equal the US 11 SuperCarriers , 10 Littoral Assault carriers , and the USS Gerald Ford ?? How does 6 capable attack subs equal 21 Virginia Class and 3 sea Wolf class ?? How about 1 Frigate operational and 2 more close equal , 80 destroyers and 22 missile cruisers ?? Not to mention 9 Literal combat ships.

    • @nagyzoli
      @nagyzoli 3 роки тому

      @@lastgleeming The country is as big as 2 continents. Their main focus is not navy (it would be quite stupid to focus on navy). In Russian vision the navy's job is to harass and delay the invasion force, and inflict as much damage as possible before the troops reach the shore. Also my point exactly, you think bombing iraq was a sufficient test of skill? Defeating a 2 year old at chess does not make you chessmaster right? If it could have done it and be certain of victory, US would already have invaded Russia, or at least destroy all major cities.

    • @lastgleeming
      @lastgleeming 3 роки тому

      @@nagyzoli WOA WOA
      Since when has America ever wanted to invade mother Russia ??
      We The People are very similar to the Russian people . We share the same values . It is Putin’s hell bent desire to reform the failed Soviet State that’s the problem. China is the US greatest threat .
      Invading Russia to conquer would be like Ford Invading a Yugo to build a better car . Pointless .

    • @nagyzoli
      @nagyzoli 3 роки тому

      @@lastgleeming Yet your guys built up your entire industry specifically for that task in the last 50 years: destroy Russia

  • @user-xs8ti6qp3k
    @user-xs8ti6qp3k 4 роки тому +1

    ✌✌✌

  • @Grogag684
    @Grogag684 2 роки тому +1

    Dead in black sea

  • @ericsonjayanliban607
    @ericsonjayanliban607 2 роки тому

    I will admit. When it comes to firepower, I choose Russia.

    • @jeremydyar7566
      @jeremydyar7566 2 роки тому +1

      Dude Ukraine sank their flagship without a navy

  • @bakarabu8279
    @bakarabu8279 2 роки тому

    🇷🇺👍🇷🇺👍

  • @MaNoFabio980
    @MaNoFabio980 2 роки тому +2

    Please right one Russian flag ship 🛳 off because it just sonk 💦 Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦

  • @yamunabiswal5385
    @yamunabiswal5385 3 роки тому +5

    Feeling proud for Russia from India 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

  • @putingulagmaster2914
    @putingulagmaster2914 3 роки тому

    Russian Aggression will be Stopped. Nato armor only about 210 mile to downtown St.-Petersburg

    • @alexkor380
      @alexkor380 3 роки тому

      Раскукарекался...

  • @mrnobody6356
    @mrnobody6356 Рік тому +1

    And we all see how powerful they are ar war aganist ukrain sinking one after another.
    Russia is not that powerful as i expected

    • @stanfordleonard338
      @stanfordleonard338 Рік тому

      Ukraine war didnt use war ship
      More tank and armor vehicle

  • @TheTankArtist
    @TheTankArtist 2 роки тому

    Oh boy Moskva, one of the most powerful ships of the Russian navy? 🤣

  • @QuanLeTravel
    @QuanLeTravel 3 роки тому

    I hate this comment section.

  • @whitehouse.gov.
    @whitehouse.gov. 3 роки тому +5

    099 nuclear-powered cruiser Peter the Great, capable of single-handedly destroying half of the amurican aircraft carrier fleet .Yes! the cruiser Peter the Great is old, But! So is the entire American Navy. The entire us aircraft carrier fleet is outdated. The cruiser Peter the Great was developed with a reserve for 50 years ahead, it will survive more than one generation.㋛

    • @jocke278
      @jocke278 3 роки тому +1

      Dont trust propaganda/fake news. Are you really that dumb? Why do you think US spends more money then anyone else on military? To have an old navy.... Have you seen the ships? LOL

    • @joshuaflores5741
      @joshuaflores5741 3 роки тому

      @iRon Drax huy giatay, hilom bi, the US 7th fleet is old, along with the rest of the US navy. Russian navy is old but capable nonetheless it would be hard for them to score impressive hits to the US navy. The navy has years and years of experience, they know how to neutralize this threat. Pisti manka, so dili ka mubasa ug libro, or atleast sweto sweto, bugo kaayo makig sturya ug foreigner niya magbinisaya, bugo jud ang giatay.

    • @joshuaflores5741
      @joshuaflores5741 3 роки тому

      @iRon Drax bogo kaayong giatay o. Pakauwaw raman ka uy

    • @joshuaflores5741
      @joshuaflores5741 3 роки тому

      @iRon Drax not a filipino? Hahahahahhahaha pakauwaw raman ka, are you hearing yourself? Kauwaw nimo uy, who tricked you into thinking like an ass, shame...wa ka gipaskwela sa, angkon lang gud

    • @joshuaflores5741
      @joshuaflores5741 3 роки тому

      @iRon Drax I'm not happy with Philippines, with its internal politics, but never have I disowned a nation where I get my language. Unlike you nga naka uyab or naka kabit ug foreigner, you started a stupid thread with your bisaya rant, HAHAHAHAHA your family must be so ashamed of you

  • @PILOT781000
    @PILOT781000 3 роки тому +2

    Long live mother Russia, long live the kremlin.
    Tavarish!!!!

  • @janslovacek9996
    @janslovacek9996 2 роки тому +1

    💂🏼‍♂️💂🏼‍♂️💂🏼‍♂️💂🏼‍♂️🚀🏍️🏍️💶🏍️💶🏍️🏍️🏍️💶

  • @yasouedit2432
    @yasouedit2432 2 роки тому +1

    Moskva is sink now because putin did

  • @bakarabu8279
    @bakarabu8279 2 роки тому

    Russia built to 💪💪💪

  • @alexcheremisin3596
    @alexcheremisin3596 3 роки тому

    The Kuznetsov is a joke by now, although subsea jets are nice too I guees

  • @S00mbre
    @S00mbre 3 роки тому +3

    Русские есть тут?

  • @paulcarson7454
    @paulcarson7454 2 роки тому +1

    The pride of the Russian fleet the Moskva was sunk by Ukrainian civilians led by a comedian. The russian navy must be really shit 🤣

  • @edgarcardenas837
    @edgarcardenas837 3 роки тому +1

    #$#$#russia owner #$#$#millitary russia owner #$#$

  • @martinneumeyer9282
    @martinneumeyer9282 Рік тому

    Meanwhile the fishes feast from the communist soldiers of Putin...

  • @Joceyln_chua
    @Joceyln_chua 3 роки тому +5

    Long live Russia!!

    • @xSuperFryx
      @xSuperFryx 2 роки тому

      I like how one of the warships on this list sank lol

  • @stalingreatterrorofrussia9006
    @stalingreatterrorofrussia9006 2 роки тому

    Old junk Poverty Russia has.

  • @chucklucas8747
    @chucklucas8747 3 роки тому +3

    One fact there you never bring up is that the Russian navy has been around since Peter the great an there navy has never won a sea battle that amounts to anything as a matter of the Japanese navy destroyed most of the Russian navy

  • @rafterrafter1227
    @rafterrafter1227 3 роки тому

    As soon as you mentioned Russia's only aircraft carrier, your video lost all credibility

  • @petepeterson4540
    @petepeterson4540 4 роки тому +4

    there dead before they even get close

    • @firma_quia_verum
      @firma_quia_verum 4 роки тому +11

      You'd be dead before they even moving old man

    • @alexzaragoza1388
      @alexzaragoza1388 3 роки тому

      @@firma_quia_verum hello Bixby(Bigsby) please tell Clayton to shut his ass up

    • @RedboRF
      @RedboRF 3 роки тому

      the eternal boomer has spoken lads

    • @petepeterson4540
      @petepeterson4540 3 роки тому

      @@firma_quia_verum we have things you don't even know about nor does the public

    • @petepeterson4540
      @petepeterson4540 3 роки тому

      @@RedboRF this boomer is wise diaper boys need to learn from us boomers

  • @theylied1776
    @theylied1776 4 роки тому +8

    The S-400 is a joke! Putin sent several S-400 SAM systems to Syria and Isreal has been using the F-35 in combat missions over Syria for the last three years now and they haven't lost a single F-35 Jet. The United States fired 59 Tomahawk Missiles at a Syrian Air-base that had the S-400 SAM system... they couldn't hit a single Tomahawk.

    • @zeknight4352
      @zeknight4352 4 роки тому +9

      theylied1776 then how come America sanctioned and withdrew the f35 deal with turkey just for buying the s400 dumbass 🤣

    • @Horizon301.
      @Horizon301. 4 роки тому +1

      xXxJ0hn_C3NAxXx probably because it opens the door for Russia to gain intelligence about the F35 from turkeys operations

    • @frankrenda2519
      @frankrenda2519 3 роки тому +1

      the yak35 hasnt been even close to syrian airspace moron

    • @Skytech92
      @Skytech92 3 роки тому +2

      First of all their S400 batteries are only there to protect tartarus and latakia naval bases not the whole syria itself you idiot. They can track IAF f35 no problem but will not engage them unless until they become a threat to the naval bases itself.

    • @theylied1776
      @theylied1776 3 роки тому

      @Boarlaw Attorneys At Law No it can't. The S-400 is a joke. Israel has been using the F-35 in combat missions over Syria and Iran (Iran has the S-300) for the last three years and they haven't lost a single fighter. And the United States launched 59 Tomahawk missiles and the S-400 couldn't target and hit any of them. All 59 missiles hit the Syrian Airfield.

  • @valerijaprichodko8572
    @valerijaprichodko8572 2 роки тому

    Well there are 4 ships now☺️ bye bye moskva 💩