These had to be the tip of the iceberg, its doesn't sound real that the deepest sub was made during the cold war. Obviously there is deeper submarine that's still classified.
@@kinster02 No, I would put the real depth as twice the published figures. But no one has returned back alive to tell how deep a submarine really went before it got crushed :))))
Where the chief ties a clothesline tightly inside and it gets looser the deeper you go lol 😂, on a side note Seawolf takes roughly , no less than 47 orca adult orca skins to cover entire vessel
Keep in mind that "test depth" is deceiving. The builders design them to withstand a certain pressure for a set amount of time, yet many Kriegsmarine Uboat captains in the Atlantic reported exceeding even the estimated crush depth of their submarines on several occasions without the pressure hulls failing while evading depth charges from overhead destroyers. The true combat diving capabilities of all military subs in service is absolutely classified. Who in their right mind would develop something that is supposed to be a step ahead of their rivals and then make that information public? Nobody.
Many Kriegsmarine captains also were crushed by the deep waters, so they had no chance to report anything. It always depends on condition of the hull. Sometimes it survived few deep dives and then it failed surprisingly during next attempt.
All true. Test depth is merely the maximum depth a submarine can operate safely ALL THE TIME, assuming the pressure hull, hull valves and anything else that communicates with the surrounding water was not damaged in some way. A submarine can go much deeper than it's rated test depth, but skippers for obvious reasons do not do that lightly. In combat though they take risks that they would not take in peacetime, even though submarines in general always operate on a war footing. One only see photos of the mangled wreckage of the U.S.S Thresher and Scorpion to see the fate that awaits any submarine that falls below collapse depth. U-boats during WW-2 were built to operate to about 500 feet, but descended to 1,000 feet to evade co-ordinated depth charge attacks from a hunter-killer group above. A depth charge exploding near the hull was always fatal.
@@georgekraus9357 Something like that happened in the 90's, I believe. The US only claimed 400' on its subs, then some Admiral was giving a briefing to the news and let slip that they were at 800'...ooops.
I was a Sonar Tech aboard the USS Henry M. Jackson SSBN 730...A Trident submarine...This popped up recommended by UA-cam. I only began watching because, as many others have commented, the Test and Crush depths of at least a U.S. Navy submarine are classified. Granted, of the 3 levels of classified material, Confidential, Secret and Top Secret, test depth of a boat is merely Confidential, and is not difficult to discern. But for a UA-cam poster to claim to have such knowledge as this for 10 different military submarines is ludicrous.
Not to mention that since I know exactly what the Test and Crush depths of a Trident submarine are, that the Ohio class is not mentioned in this list, as it would be by the depths indicated by the poster of the video, merely proves just how inaccurate it is
ex-ops room radar operator: we got the sonar data along with EW input to make the sit-plot. A copy of Jane's Fighting Ships was always there, now all on-line. The published data of ships are the manufactures for cruising operation. Actual capability in speed and depth in fighting mode is at the maximum of +/- specifications and the nerve of the captain. Those specs are always somewhat unknown. Add 10% for temporary extreme performance is the usual assumption.
When out to sea, we always remember this. Two things- #1. The fire department will never get to you fast enough to help, no matter the situation. #2. The furthest you will ever be from land is only a little over seven miles, dry land is another consideration.
True but those numbers are probably close to actual. Engineers can make good estimates based on what they know about the materials used and other facts about the designs which can't realistically be kept secret.
Depth capability is greatly overrated. It may help get under a thermocline to bounce the sound. But the depth capability means the sub is able to withstand explosive pressure from depth charges. The important factor is quietness. If they can't hear you they can't find you.
Every boat is as good as it's welds, and every boat, same class or not, has a unique crush depth. It isn't unusual for a submarine to be capable of twice it's "test depth" Our boats back on the 30s and 40s would, in a pinch, go well beyond their rated depths.
One bad weld, one little drop of paint, the lives of the crew depend on millions of parts all working exactly as intended- which is why I could never feel comfortable on board a submarine during a dive. I like the sea but not being underneath it thank you 🫳
I’ve a BS in Chemistry 🧪. Knowing how hard Titanium is to work with - I’m impressed The Russkies were able to build an entire sub from the Element. It also has the advantage of being non-magnetic - making MAD detection almost impossible. The Akula Class also used a Liquid Sodium Cooled Reactor. This is great for achieving a compact reactor. However - Sodium reacts vigorously with water - even more so in a molten state. You’re trying to keep absolutely all water out - when you’re totally surrounded by it. The US has a hard time working with Titanium. When building The SR-71 - it was found even the trace amount of cadmium left behind by cadmium plated wrenches would cause bolts to fail. Tracing lines with Pentel Markers would leave behind trace amounts of ink - that sometimes had components that could cause welds to fail. Welds washed off with water during the summer tended to fail more often than those in winter - which had to do with amount of Chlorine in the water. So they switched to distilled water to rinse off parts.
Hello ! May Allah protect and guide you to his light and happiness in this life and the hereafter, God bless, Ameen. Excuse me for giving a little presentation of Islam, because it is very misunderstood nowadays, especially on those « Antichrist's » times, where media and politics are mixed to distort history and truth. And terrorists (puppets of the Antichrist) who misinterpret verses, out of ignorance and political motivations, and take them out of historical context (just like radical atheists do by the way), don't help either. Thank you very much for your time. Islam is an arabic word that means the Surrender to the One and Only God, our Creator, Protector, Provider, who gives us life and all that we have, we are safe and sound by his will and grace, we are His and to Him we return, and we have to thank him in this trial life by submitting to him by our free will, or later in the Day of judgment when it's too late to save our own skin. Islam was the original Religion descended to earth from heaven with Adam and Eve (peace and blessing be upon them) in the beginning of humanity. and was passed to people with the succession of the 124 000 prophets and 315 messengers of God to all nations and civilizations since, passing by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ismaël, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, David, Solomon and Jesus (Peace and blessing be upon them) during the history of mankind, the last replaces and completes the previous, until the succession of the last messenger of God fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) to complete the noble morals of all mankind, to bring humans and jinns out of darkness into light, and to purify people's religion and belief from corruption and polytheism, and return it to purity and true monotheism, like it was in the times of the prophets (Peace and blessing be upon them). Many Religions that we know nowadays, at their beginning were true and under Islam, initiated by one of the prophets of God, but their original teachings, history and scriptures have been corrupted over time with falsification and polytheism, or lost and replaced with false ones. That's why Islam is the only Religion accepted by God nowadays, which consists in bearing witness that there is no god besides Allah (God in Aramaic, the original language of Jesus and the Gospel), and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger, just like Jesus and Moses and others are His servants and messengers. Never a messenger of God said he was God or literally son of God, it was the people after him who changed the words of God and corrupted the Religion. God is unique and absolute, He does not need to have a family and sons or to associate anyone else with His kingdom, He can simply create whatever He wants, everything belongs to Him, and to Him everything will return. Allah said in Surah Al-Mu’minun : “God has never begotten a son, nor is there any god besides Him. Otherwise, each god would have taken away what it has created, and some of them would have gained supremacy over others. Glory be to God, far beyond what they describe. The Knower of the hidden and the manifest. He is exalted, far above what they associate. (91-92 / Translated by ITANI). Allah means the one and only God, the God of all prophets and creatures, the creator of the universe and mankind, and the Master of the Day of judgment, where our destiny, Hell or Paradise, is decided based on our faith and deeds in this trial life, and above all, Allah's mercy. Allah said in Surah Al-Ikhlas : In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful. Say, “He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He begets not, nor was He begotten. And there is none comparable to Him.” (1-4 / Translated by ITANI). Allah said in Surah An-Nisa : O FOLLOWERS of the Gospel! Do not overstep the bounds [of truth] in your religious beliefs, and do not say of God anything but the truth. The Christ Jesus, son of Mary, was but God's Apostle - [the fulfilment of] His promise which He had conveyed unto Mary - and a soul created by Him. Believe, then, in God and His apostles, and do not say, "[God is] a trinity". Desist [from this assertion] for your own good. God is but One God; utterly remote is He, in His glory, from having a son: unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth; and none is as worthy of trust as God. Never did the Christ feel too proud to be God's servant, nor do the angels who are near unto Him. And those who feel too proud to serve Him and glory in their arrogance [should know that on Judgment Day] He will gather them all unto Himself: (171-172 / Translated by Muhammad Asad). Allah the Most Merciful said in Surah Ali-Imran : Behold, the only [true] religion in the sight of God is [man's] self-surrender unto Him; and those who were vouchsafed revelation aforetime took, out of mutual jealousy, to divergent views [on this point] only after knowledge [thereof] had come unto them. But as for him who denies the truth of God's messages - behold, God is swift in reckoning! Thus, [O Prophet,] if they argue with thee, say, "I have surrendered my whole being unto God, and [so have] all who follow me!" - and ask those who have been vouchsafed revelation aforetime, as well as all unlettered people, "Have you [too] surrendered yourselves unto Him?" And if they surrender themselves unto Him, they are on the right path; but if they turn away - behold, thy duty is no more than to deliver the message: for God sees all that is in [the hearts of] His creatures. Verily, as for those who deny the truth of God's messages, and slay the prophets against all right, and slay people who enjoin equity - announce unto them a grievous chastisement. It is they whose works shall come to nought both in this world and in the life to come; and they shall have none to succour them. (19-22 / Translated by Muhammad Asad).. Salam (Peace) -----------
Komsomolets K278 reached a test depth of over 1000m and doesn’t get crushed until 1500m. Titanium is strong as hell. I’d imagine if the ships of today needed to go that deep, they'd survive.
@@Phoenix-my8sv Titanium has a lot of interesting properties but it is not stronger than steel. It is stronger than Aluminum. We've worked it before and it's a bitch. When you try to ablate it titanium assumes the consistancy of chewing gum and flows like Lava. Very difficult to work because it gums up your tool heads and essentialy ruins them. We can easily work a steel edge to 1/10000 inch but we were lucky to be able to spec Titanium to 1/100 inch. My hats off to the Russkies but I bet that Sub bankrupted them.
but we do know. We monitor the exact location of Chinese subs continuously as well as those of Russia by way of several assets that we won't get into here
I can remember when I operated the 'Turtle' during the great war I was told I could go down to at least 3.28 feet before I risked a hull implosion. I must say things have come a long way since I fought against the red coats!
@Jim Kalpa According to ancient text, those wooden torpedoes were a gift from the Gods, who are also known as the Little Green Men. In fact, after giving us humans that highly advanced technology, the Little Green Men almost yanked it back in fear of destroying mankinds natural progression cycle. I'm glad I read books!
Damn, friend, how old you are and how well you have learned the new information technologies, look, you even have a UA-cam channel! surely you also have social networks, and you are over 120 years old! I hope you do well with the girls too hahaha
I was a pilot of the worlds deepest diving submersible at the time. DSV 4 Sea Cliff. 20,000 foot capable submersible. It was designed to sink to the bottom. 16,000 feet is my deepest dive.
@@andrewthomson Joined the Navy. Went through Electronics schools, Dive school etc.... Volunteered Subs. Served a 4 year tour on an SSN. Decided I didn't want to be just another body scrubbing decks. So I took advantage of an opportunity that presented itself and forced a Detailer into giving me orders to the Submersible command that the LCDR I was working with was going to be the Officer In Charge of. Qualified Co-Pilot, then Pilot. Can't do that anymore as they got rid of everything: DSV's 3 and 4, DSRV's... All of it. Sea Cliff, Turtle, Mystic and Avalon. All gone. It all sits in the Keyport Wa Museum parking lot next to the Trieste. I'm finishing up this in an Underwater Acoustics Ocean Engineering Position. Almost done. What a ride!
Nope... The Test and Crush depths of a Trident are only Confidential... The lowest of the 3 levels of Naval security classifications. Because those depths are not very difficult to discern if you have actually built your own submarines. Russia has built many subs. They are fully aware of the approximate realistic depths to which military submarines are capable... Because they have built their own... The ocean is the constant. Technology and metallurgy can only do so much against the pressure of the oceans. Regardless of nationality.... Take it from an old boomer squid. Those depths are NOT the hilarious 5000 or 10,000 meters these fools on here are claiming... So while the limits ARE classified, they are not highly classified
Yes, crush depth. Test depth is the maximum safe tested depth. Exact crush depth is a bit of an unknown. It's predicted based on calculations, but it's impossible to prove without, ya know, CRUSHING IT. And at close to crush depth, even small condition changes could result in the sub sustaining damage or crushing. Crush depth is usually another 30-50% deeper than test depth. In war, a sub commander could decide to go deeper than test depth to get away from hostiles, at increased risk of damage or crush.
@@thebuzz4108 There is Test Depth which is the maximum depth at which the submarine is allowed to operate during peace time and is dictated by its structure. Then Crush Depth is the depth at which the submarine's hull will not be able to sustain the pressure and will crush. These figures are 2/3 of crush depth of US Submarines and 4/7 of crush depth for British Submarines. As an example, if the test depth of a Sub is 600 meters (~ 2000 ft), its crush depth is 900 meters (~ 3000 ft) if the Submarine is American.
@@hatman4818 There is Test Depth which is the maximum depth at which the submarine is allowed to operate during peace time and is dictated by its structure. Then Crush Depth is the depth at which the submarine's hull will not be able to sustain the pressure and will crush. These figures are 2/3 of crush depth of US Submarines and 4/7 of crush depth for British Submarines. As an example, if the test depth of a Sub is 600 meters (~ 2000 ft), its crush depth is 900 meters (~ 3000 ft) if the Submarine is American.
Just going to say this without any elaboration... The Seawolf can dive a lot deeper and go a lot faster than this video claims. I would know, I was on it.
@@aleksandrvix1890 "АС-12, известная также как «Лошарик» - российская сверхсекретная глубоководная атомная подводная лодка, не несущая вооружения и способная погружаться, по некоторым данным, на глубину до 6000 метров" как бы понятно кто топ в этом топе=)))
"Borei," also "Dolgorukiya," on behalf of the head ship class, is a series of Russian nuclear submarines (cruisers) class strategic missile cruiser (RCSN) of the 4th generation.
@@Aengrod This is Russian vessel. In Russia, and almost all East Europe countries vessels/vehicles are HE, not SHE. So, he is not wrong, regardless of writing in English. Writing in other languages does not change my customs. You are velcome...
it's related. There are different ocean currents at different depths, forming layers, and sound is not always conductive from one layer to another, so to speak, due to differences in temperatures between them.
Maximum test, and crush depths are always classified. They may not even be revealed to the captains, or XOs as a matter of protocol. All classified operating documentation will probably only identify operating parameters that can be fully guaranteed by the builder. Given engineering safety factors, the ultimate limits may only be known by very few engineers, scientists, and senior naval staff. The most probable points of rupture would likely be at welded joints, hatch interfaces, and anywhere external objects need to penetrate the pressure hull; such as periscopes, and power transmission shafts.
Well the Captain and XO must have a number to go on to not exceed that number. If that is the maximum crush/test depth or not or a decided max depth is irrelevant as that number is the maximum depth the sub can operate in anyway. So that number that the captain gets is the maximum depth of the sub even if the sub itself would be able to handle more.
Right... And on my boat, we never told the Skipper where we kept the Trident C-4 missiles.... Protocol... Sheesh! I guarantee you that no US Navy Captain of a submarine has gone to sea ignorant of his boat's capabilities....
The data given is only an assumption, as the real parameters are classified. The loveliest thing about this video is the voice of the lady. I can go on listening to her for hours, even if she is taking nonsense. Her voice is very soothing.
The Oscar and Sierra class subs when the USSR designed and built them in the Cold War they knew that they only way to survive was: speed and depth. They were so noisy you could hear them at miles away even if they were running silent and our boats were at flank lol. They didn’t improve much in class 2 either. Unfortunately they found out the hard way the 688I were just as fast and could dive almost as deep but much quieter. Many minor collisions occurred because of close encounters with the Russian boats and boomers by accident. Simply because the Russian Captains didn’t know the American boats were there. Unfortunate risks but things that never made the news and truth is none of those skippers wanted to start WW3 it was more about the job and egos lol.
@@billgere5293 Funny i seem to remember Alfa's diving too 4,000 Feet in the early 80's. And Honeywell made mark 50. Only had a Max depth of 1,900 feet. So the 688 could do nothing.
Russian "weakling" submarines Kursk (Oscar class) and K-278 (only 1 made ever) both sunk and killed their crews en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_submarine_K-278_Komsomolets en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_submarine_Kursk_(K-141)
@@billgere5293 The 688 had terrible depth capability compared to Soviet subs. Its one of the few US subs along with the Virginia that couldn't dive as deep as the previous class. Test depth of 950 ft. Blame it on Rickover. He could've had a sub with a 2000 ft test depth had he gone with CONFORM.
@@JG-dx5wi oh I agree but they still could achieve 400m. The Russian subs on average can test over 800m. The information that is given here for the Akula’s test is in correct.
And they forgot nuclear russian submarine of project 10831 which demonstrated depth of 3000 m (yes, three thousands), while by rumors (project is classified) it can reach up to 6000.
You do realize that this list is bullshit and not at all accurate? How deep a sub can dive is one of the most heavily guarded secrets of it. This kind of infomation is not made public in the US, Russia, England, France or any other nation. Whoever made this video has no idea what their talking about. Obviously if China has the second deepest diving sub in the world. They can't even build a decent jet engine for themselves and your going to tell me they can build a sub, which is a thousand times harder to do, that can dive deeper than just one sub on earth. Yeah ok if you believe that I got some great snow skiing property for sale in southern Florida.
@@juliap.5375 hahahaha you too? Rumors and Russian rumors at that. Like I said to Munindra, if you believe that then I have some great snow skiing property in southern Florida for sale real cheap, interested? 3,000 no wait, 6,000 meters you say? hahahahah and you really believe that? Especially coming from Russia who is the best at blowing smoke up the worlds ass. You probably would believe the world is really flat and that the universe spins around the earth too. A sub that can dive 2 miles deep give me a break. You probably have no idea what kind of pressure there is at 2 miles down. At 6,000 meters the water pressure is around 8,760 psi. That is every square inch on that sub there is 8,760 pounds of pressure pushing in on it. hahahahah or a teenage to young adult bull African Elephant standing on it. If they could I mean. Sorry to burst your little bubble but those aren't rumors you heard but the usual Russian flat out lying. Hhahahah even the idiots who made up this fictional list knew better than to include some Russian fantasy so they didn't forget, They just didn't want their list to look any more stupid then it already did. It's bad enough as it is. hahaha I have to thank you for making me laugh though. Thank you. hahahah still laughing.
Once on station they move fairly slowly. Cavitation on the propeller would give away their position so the propeller turns very slowly. Most nuclear subs operate below the thermocline which varies depending on the location in the oceans.
The Chinese one I absolutely don't believe. They are a good two decades behind in noise abatement. Electric subs are very quiet ambush predators, they turn their diesel engines off. The nuclear subs are pretty damn quiet going 30+ knots if they are deep enough to avoid cavitation - but they will never be as quiet as a diesel electric.
wtf? You are wrong. Absolute record belongs to your country - USA submarine USS Scorpion (SSN-589). Her record is diving to depth 3000 meters near Azor Islands. So, it dove, crashed, and never surfaced, together with entire crew. But your anti-russian propaganda hides it from you.
'Test depth' has different meanings depending on the navy involved. Navies around the world define it anywhere between two-thirds to just one-half maximum design depth.
@@neilgriffiths6427 Accurate details are. But you can get a fair estimation of the actual design depth of the submarine by looking at the pressure rating of the steel used in its construction, plus the official test depth ratings for each navy. HY-80 for example, used in most western subs during the cold war, has a rating of about 550mts (the USS Thresher, built on this steel, had a test depth of 400 mts; now if we take the US Navy's two thirds test depth rating, that would mean that the design depth of the then Thresher-Class, was 600 mts, and Thresher herself imploded at around 730 mts). Cheers.
They forgot the russian Alfa-Class with estimated dive depth of 900m, and 41 knots speed. Unreachable for western Torpedoes! "c'mon, shoot me if you can!"
That was true, at the times when first alfa class went operational, most torpedoes top speed usually stays at 35 knots max, but shortly after the alfa class specs fully collected, also on one occasion, alfas were caught speeding at 40s knots, most NATO nations started to fielding 50s knot torpedoes, UK spearfish with 70 knots as well as mk 48 adcap at 65 knots as two examples.. With 600 meters of maximum target depth to boot.. If those coldwar specs/stories are to be used as a reference in the least..
@@barracuda7018 41 knots is indeed a joke, it was 43.7 knots at 97% output- they stopped there because everything started shaking rather unpleasantly. It was a twin reactor design fully titanium to make it as light as possible, its as close as you get to a truly racing submarine. Nothing about it is estimated or speculative, they are painstakingly monitored and tracked. Alfa was very easy to track because it wasn't exactly a quiet submarine, but it was too fast to do anything about at the time. They even considered liquid metal reactors to go even faster, but they went for the tried and true. It was disgustingly expensive. Go speak to some submariners who were involved in recording data on her.
Самая быстрая (К-222), самая глубоководная (К-278), самая крупная (проект 941 «Акула») и самая скрытная лодка (проект 945А «Кондор») были созданы именно в СССР.
@@antibiotickprojeckt2660 это уже не смешно, вы опоздали с этой шуткой на 15 лет, более того оно имеет глупую риторику. 1-Яхты тоже корабли и их строить нужно уметь. 2 По вашим тезисам яхты должны покупаться за кордоном ибо мы их делать не должны уметь.
@@chaosXP3RT, you might realise that your statements sound either like a manipulation trick or a logical fallacy. You first make the wrong assumption/overgeneralisation ("They always claim everything is better than the USA..."), incorrectly attribute it to your opponent(s) and then refute it. To get a balanced opinion on the Soviet/Russian military, it is important to bear in mind that both sides are biased and one should look not only at Western sources of information but Russian ones as well (you need to know Russian to do that seriously). Each coin has two sides and if you see one side of the coin, this does not mean you know how the whole coin looks.
@@alexeysergeev2151 Russian GRU-officers (joke) say that Russia's deepest submarine is the A-12, which could dive to a depth of 6,000m (about 18,000 feet)
French army is clear : real dive capacity are never communicated. When you heard our officers they allways say the average known depth of all the concurrence and the typical ( and official) phrase is " we dive at least to 400" ( probably much more) So this kind of vid is totally irrelevant.
A former submariner told me about a boat that exceeded its listed depth by several fathoms. It returned to port several feet longer than it was before the trip. The proof of this was that it could no longer fit into its dock space/pen.
0:17 Does anyone else get the creepy feeling that that sub with all the barnacles is a tomb that they found at the bottom of the sea? I wouldn't want to get inside that.
hey man US never caught up with russia lot of mistake in depth measurement akula can reach 600m (full payload) yasen also tested for 600m (full payload) seawolf maximum test depth is 480m.(not payload mentioned)
@@vadrak6197 yeah we stole info on the F-22 from............ ok we stole info on the F-35 from........ Ok we stole info on the quitest nuclear sub in the world from............... Wait, how can we steal from others when they don't have what we do? I mean you can't have the best by stealing because no one else has what you do. Well VaDrak looks like you are blowing smoke up everyone's ass. Think maybe your Russian. Before anybody says anything I know Sweden has probably the quitest sub in the world but it isn't nuclear. My point is when you have things like Stealth technology and have had it for 20+ years, and no one else still has it, how in the hell could the info have been stolen? Make absolutly no sense at all. That is just one of many examples of what I am talking about. Blow your smoke elsewhere VaDrak, nobody here is buying it.
Well like many here have been saying, information about how deep a sub can dive is highly classified information and nobody except those that are suppose to know, knows it. You have no idea the depth the Akula or Yasen or Seawolf can dive. Whatever source you got that from has no idea either. Most likely just guesses at what it might be. The US doesn't need to catch up with Russia in how deep a sub can go. The US has a huge advantage when it comes to how quiet a sub is and there is no better issue when it comes to subs than how quiet it is. To this day a Ohio class ballistic submarine has never been successfully tracked by a Russian or any other country sub. And the Ohip class subs have been around for several decades. When it comes to the Seawolfs and Virginia class subs, forget it they don't stand a chance in finding one of them outside of being extremely lucky. On the other hand Los Angeles class subs track and even follow Russian subs all over the place. Most of the time unnoticed. So if the US is a little behind, which I doubt, in how deep their subs can dive compared to the Russian subs I say who cares. No where near as important as being more quiet.
@@t74guard78 Yea you leave out the names of the operations where the US stole the technology, lol! Project Azorian? US has stolen entire Russian submarines so they could reverse engineer and copy Russian technology? Project Diamond? Project Have Doughnut? So we know for a fact the US stole every MIG ever built. And used Russian science and math to develop low radar cross sections for aircraft? Is that not what Lockheed tells us how they did it? I agree makes no sense at all to leave the proof and facts throughout history out. Cos you would have to pretend you didn't steal the technology when all the US military looks like a copy of other countries stuff? lmao!
The Soviet nuclear submarine K-278 "Komsomolets" belongs to the submarines of the 3rd generation, it is the only submarine of the project 685 "Fin". On August 4, 1985, she set an absolute record for diving depth among submarines - 1027 meters.
Russian K-278 Komsomolets (Project 685 "Plavnik" or Mike class) - nuclear-powered attack submarine wich had reached a depth of 1,027 meters back in 1984. That's a first place actually.
The Virginia block 4 is the best submarine right now but Russia and us build a fifth gen of subs like Columbia and borei but us say that Columbia it will be the best subs ever
The Russians yet again! They love it down there skulking at the bottom of the ocean 🤣 All jokes aside they are incredible machines being able to withstand the immense pressures down there!
@@burnerjack01 records don't go away just because its no longer in service. Otherwise we would strip all athletes of their medals when they die, no? there is no such thing as "world record holder weightlifter or 100m sprint 'still alive'" no, it just world record holder, period.
@@dataman6744 true, but the video was about subs that were in active service at the time of making it. so technically, the K-278 doesn't count because it wasn't in active service.
And wouldn't they i think anyone would but it not only the u.s we have two new uk carriers as well which i think is already being stocked with f35 the hms prince of wales and the hms queen Elizabeth so good luck to them
A Russian, an American and a British at an Harbour talk about which Sub will last longest:The British:Ours will doing best, only need to surface when Tea is empty!! The American: We only surface when our Whiskey is empty!! The Russian; We need to go up if the Wodka is done....suddenly you hear a Sound .....Tuck Tuck Tuck....an German WW2 Typ VII C/41 Sub enters the Harbour, Captains comes out and asks: You got some Schnaps here???
The only combat submarine that has such a submersion depth was only the Soviet nuclear submarine Komsomolets, it had a working depth of 1000 meters and a maximum depth of 1250
And this entire list is probably mostly wrong, for the simple fact, that any information on what depths these submarines can go, be it test, operational, or maximum depths, it's all classified, the public at large will never know. I'm willing to bet that even many of the crew on those subs don't know how deep their subs can dive, with information known only to a select few of the crew and officers.
LooseCannon did say some of the crew know and just because one might know how deep they are, it doesn't mean he or she knows how deep it can go. I agree with LooseCannon because this is a very closely guarded secret. A few on the sub may know but not many. Whoever made this list has no idea which subs dive deeper. Can't you tell by it's choice for second. A Chinese non nuclear sub. Please give me a break.
@Matthew Huszarik An LA class has a crew of around 120+. So they put in 100s of depth gages? Or do they all huddle around the one depth gage in the really big room subs always have? lol! Nah you dare one of those crew to take a picture and tweet it? Then you know for a fact. Then tell Kristian Saucier onboard the USS Alexandria to go inside the nuclear reactor room and make pics all around. When the FBI and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service show up at his door? Don't respond to his emails and just ghost his ass. Else you end up in jail too? ;-)
As a former US submariner, I would say that the only people that know how deep a submarine can really go are dead.
I suspect it may vary even between subs within class. Simply due to strains accumulated during service.
These had to be the tip of the iceberg, its doesn't sound real that the deepest sub was made during the cold war. Obviously there is deeper submarine that's still classified.
@@pasta8709 not necessarily. War budgets were cut after the cold war. A lot of projects has been tossed in the "not today" box.
@@brandenstangle320 Well, as a retired vet of the US navy silent service, I'll say they are pretty darn close.
@@kinster02
No, I would put the real depth as twice the published figures.
But no one has returned back alive to tell how deep a submarine really went before it got crushed :))))
Technically, all submarines can reach the bottom of the ocean.
On occasion, they do.
@ K-219 is now at 5500 m.
And stay there for good...
LOL. ;-)
can't argue with that...
All submarines have a secret performance margin for use only in wartime.
+/-20 percent at least I bet.
Where the chief ties a clothesline tightly inside and it gets looser the deeper you go lol 😂, on a side note Seawolf takes roughly , no less than 47 orca adult orca skins to cover entire vessel
Really? And where might you have come across this information?
@@EricThompson1965 It is in a secret Russian report about the American Ohio class submarines.
@ True, in chinese factories by abused children !!!!!!!
Pray for kri nanggala 402....indonesia submarine...53 people died...pray for them all.😔😔
Thanks dude
I am Indonesian
Keep in mind that "test depth" is deceiving. The builders design them to withstand a certain pressure for a set amount of time, yet many Kriegsmarine Uboat captains in the Atlantic reported exceeding even the estimated crush depth of their submarines on several occasions without the pressure hulls failing while evading depth charges from overhead destroyers. The true combat diving capabilities of all military subs in service is absolutely classified. Who in their right mind would develop something that is supposed to be a step ahead of their rivals and then make that information public? Nobody.
Many Kriegsmarine captains also were crushed by the deep waters, so they had no chance to report anything.
It always depends on condition of the hull. Sometimes it survived few deep dives and then it failed surprisingly during next attempt.
All true. Test depth is merely the maximum depth a submarine can operate safely ALL THE TIME, assuming the pressure hull, hull valves and anything else that communicates with the surrounding water was not damaged in some way. A submarine can go much deeper than it's rated test depth, but skippers for obvious reasons do not do that lightly. In combat though they take risks that they would not take in peacetime, even though submarines in general always operate on a war footing. One only see photos of the mangled wreckage of the U.S.S Thresher and Scorpion to see the fate that awaits any submarine that falls below collapse depth. U-boats during WW-2 were built to operate to about 500 feet, but descended to 1,000 feet to evade co-ordinated depth charge attacks from a hunter-killer group above. A depth charge exploding near the hull was always fatal.
In WWII, a diving depth of U.S. subs was classified from Japan until one Congressman opened his mouth ....
@@georgekraus9357 Something like that happened in the 90's, I believe. The US only claimed 400' on its subs, then some Admiral was giving a briefing to the news and let slip that they were at 800'...ooops.
THE US, WE GIVE , SELL ( NOT REALLY ) ,OFFER TO CHINA ON A REGULAR BASES,......IN THE NAME OF FREEDOM ..OFCOURSE !!! DO YOUR HOME WORK ..SHEEPLE !!
I was a Sonar Tech aboard the USS Henry M. Jackson SSBN 730...A Trident submarine...This popped up recommended by UA-cam. I only began watching because, as many others have commented, the Test and Crush depths of at least a U.S. Navy submarine are classified. Granted, of the 3 levels of classified material, Confidential, Secret and Top Secret, test depth of a boat is merely Confidential, and is not difficult to discern. But for a UA-cam poster to claim to have such knowledge as this for 10 different military submarines is ludicrous.
Not to mention that since I know exactly what the Test and Crush depths of a Trident submarine are, that the Ohio class is not mentioned in this list, as it would be by the depths indicated by the poster of the video, merely proves just how inaccurate it is
Eric T: Ditto for Jimmy Carter.... This is a joke, and it’s dangerous. Ignorance might be bliss, but this bs will get people killed.
ex-ops room radar operator: we got the sonar data along with EW input to make the sit-plot. A copy of Jane's Fighting Ships was always there, now all on-line. The published data of ships are the manufactures for cruising operation. Actual capability in speed and depth in fighting mode is at the maximum of +/- specifications and the nerve of the captain. Those specs are always somewhat unknown. Add 10% for temporary extreme performance is the usual assumption.
Yeah, I've sent off a request to UA-cam for a copy of this video so I can use it for fertiliser.
It's chock full of BS
only got the first one right...greater than..should have put a (>) symbol on all
When out to sea, we always remember this. Two things- #1. The fire department will never get to you fast enough to help, no matter the situation. #2. The furthest you will ever be from land is only a little over seven miles, dry land is another consideration.
Lol
Hahaha
Fire department?? SmH.
You do realise even clowns like chefs have active roles in firefighting & damage control & are trained as such in the military.
this is not funny today
who seriously believes these figures. The official figures are kept secret.
Yeee...
True but those numbers are probably close to actual. Engineers can make good estimates based on what they know about the materials used and other facts about the designs which can't realistically be kept secret.
Depth capability is greatly overrated. It may help get under a thermocline to bounce the sound. But the depth capability means the sub is able to withstand explosive pressure from depth charges.
The important factor is quietness. If they can't hear you they can't find you.
@@davem5333 no more depth charges
okay dont watch
500m?
Ocean gate:
Hold my game controller 😮
nowadays jokes
this did not age great...
Pray to Nanggala 402 Sub Marine
They all died...53 lost soul's. RIP
@@dannymccoy1783 you are right 😞😞😞
Salam takziah & al fatihah...😔
brisik
@@bimoseno6816 lu ngapa tong?
Every boat is as good as it's welds, and every boat, same class or not, has a unique crush depth. It isn't unusual for a submarine to be capable of twice it's "test depth" Our boats back on the 30s and 40s would, in a pinch, go well beyond their rated depths.
One bad weld, one little drop of paint, the lives of the crew depend on millions of parts all working exactly as intended- which is why I could never feel comfortable on board a submarine during a dive. I like the sea but not being underneath it thank you 🫳
I’ve a BS in Chemistry 🧪. Knowing how hard Titanium is to work with - I’m impressed The Russkies were able to build an entire sub from the Element. It also has the advantage of being non-magnetic - making MAD detection almost impossible. The Akula Class also used a Liquid Sodium Cooled Reactor. This is great for achieving a compact reactor. However - Sodium reacts vigorously with water - even more so in a molten state. You’re trying to keep absolutely all water out - when you’re totally surrounded by it.
The US has a hard time working with Titanium. When building The SR-71 - it was found even the trace amount of cadmium left behind by cadmium plated wrenches would cause bolts to fail. Tracing lines with Pentel Markers would leave behind trace amounts of ink - that sometimes had components that could cause welds to fail. Welds washed off with water during the summer tended to fail more often than those in winter - which had to do with amount of Chlorine in the water. So they switched to distilled water to rinse off parts.
So best subs would be constructed of a continuous material with as little welds as possible?
@@JD-re3cj I would imagine that they are using x-ray to ensure the quality of the welds.
Hello ! May Allah protect and guide you to his light and happiness in this life and the hereafter, God bless, Ameen. Excuse me for giving a little presentation of Islam, because it is very misunderstood nowadays, especially on those « Antichrist's » times, where media and politics are mixed to distort history and truth. And terrorists (puppets of the Antichrist) who misinterpret verses, out of ignorance and political motivations, and take them out of historical context (just like radical atheists do by the way), don't help either. Thank you very much for your time.
Islam is an arabic word that means the Surrender to the One and Only God, our Creator, Protector, Provider, who gives us life and all that we have, we are safe and sound by his will and grace, we are His and to Him we return, and we have to thank him in this trial life by submitting to him by our free will, or later in the Day of judgment when it's too late to save our own skin. Islam was the original Religion descended to earth from heaven with Adam and Eve (peace and blessing be upon them) in the beginning of humanity. and was passed to people with the succession of the 124 000 prophets and 315 messengers of God to all nations and civilizations since, passing by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ismaël, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, David, Solomon and Jesus (Peace and blessing be upon them) during the history of mankind, the last replaces and completes the previous, until the succession of the last messenger of God fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) to complete the noble morals of all mankind, to bring humans and jinns out of darkness into light, and to purify people's religion and belief from corruption and polytheism, and return it to purity and true monotheism, like it was in the times of the prophets (Peace and blessing be upon them).
Many Religions that we know nowadays, at their beginning were true and under Islam, initiated by one of the prophets of God, but their original teachings, history and scriptures have been corrupted over time with falsification and polytheism, or lost and replaced with false ones. That's why Islam is the only Religion accepted by God nowadays, which consists in bearing witness that there is no god besides Allah (God in Aramaic, the original language of Jesus and the Gospel), and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger, just like Jesus and Moses and others are His servants and messengers. Never a messenger of God said he was God or literally son of God, it was the people after him who changed the words of God and corrupted the Religion. God is unique and absolute, He does not need to have a family and sons or to associate anyone else with His kingdom, He can simply create whatever He wants, everything belongs to Him, and to Him everything will return. Allah said in Surah Al-Mu’minun : “God has never begotten a son, nor is there any god besides Him. Otherwise, each god would have taken away what it has created, and some of them would have gained supremacy over others. Glory be to God, far beyond what they describe. The Knower of the hidden and the manifest. He is exalted, far above what they associate. (91-92 / Translated by ITANI).
Allah means the one and only God, the God of all prophets and creatures, the creator of the universe and mankind, and the Master of the Day of judgment, where our destiny, Hell or Paradise, is decided based on our faith and deeds in this trial life, and above all, Allah's mercy.
Allah said in Surah Al-Ikhlas : In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful.
Say, “He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He begets not, nor was He begotten. And there is none comparable to Him.” (1-4 / Translated by ITANI).
Allah said in Surah An-Nisa : O FOLLOWERS of the Gospel! Do not overstep the bounds [of truth] in your religious beliefs, and do not say of God anything but the truth. The Christ Jesus, son of Mary, was but God's Apostle - [the fulfilment of] His promise which He had conveyed unto Mary - and a soul created by Him. Believe, then, in God and His apostles, and do not say, "[God is] a trinity". Desist [from this assertion] for your own good. God is but One God; utterly remote is He, in His glory, from having a son: unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth; and none is as worthy of trust as God. Never did the Christ feel too proud to be God's servant, nor do the angels who are near unto Him. And those who feel too proud to serve Him and glory in their arrogance [should know that on Judgment Day] He will gather them all unto Himself: (171-172 / Translated by Muhammad Asad).
Allah the Most Merciful said in Surah Ali-Imran : Behold, the only [true] religion in the sight of God is [man's] self-surrender unto Him; and those who were vouchsafed revelation aforetime took, out of mutual jealousy, to divergent views [on this point] only after knowledge [thereof] had come unto them. But as for him who denies the truth of God's messages - behold, God is swift in reckoning!
Thus, [O Prophet,] if they argue with thee, say, "I have surrendered my whole being unto God, and [so have] all who follow me!" - and ask those who have been vouchsafed revelation aforetime, as well as all unlettered people, "Have you [too] surrendered yourselves unto Him?" And if they surrender themselves unto Him, they are on the right path; but if they turn away - behold, thy duty is no more than to deliver the message: for God sees all that is in [the hearts of] His creatures.
Verily, as for those who deny the truth of God's messages, and slay the prophets against all right, and slay people who enjoin equity - announce unto them a grievous chastisement.
It is they whose works shall come to nought both in this world and in the life to come; and they shall have none to succour them.
(19-22 / Translated by Muhammad Asad)..
Salam (Peace) -----------
Komsomolets K278 reached a test depth of over 1000m and doesn’t get crushed until 1500m. Titanium is strong as hell. I’d imagine if the ships of today needed to go that deep, they'd survive.
It can go all the way to the bottom one time .
Titanium is not as strong as steel.
@@fredjones7705 Chemistry and physics are taught for compression and stretching, titanium is superior to steel + low carbon content.
@@fredjones7705 That's why our submarines are made of it, so you'll get our figs out of the water, and our ones will get it.
@@Phoenix-my8sv Titanium has a lot of interesting properties but it is not stronger than steel. It is stronger than Aluminum. We've worked it before and it's a bitch. When you try to ablate it titanium assumes the consistancy of chewing gum and flows like Lava. Very difficult to work because it gums up your tool heads and essentialy ruins them. We can easily work a steel edge to 1/10000 inch but we were lucky to be able to spec Titanium to 1/100 inch. My hats off to the Russkies but I bet that Sub bankrupted them.
submarines are the scariest thing i know about. the fact that they could be anywhere, and we don’t even know about it is terrifying to me
Submarines are the most advanced types of crypts I know! ;-)
but we do know. We monitor the exact location of Chinese subs continuously as well as those of Russia by way of several assets that we won't get into here
the US & UK know where almost every submarine is.
@@gendaminoru3195 hydrophone
@@enoughofthis among others
I can remember when I operated the 'Turtle' during the great war I was told I could go down to at least 3.28 feet before I risked a hull implosion. I must say things have come a long way since I fought against the red coats!
Now that's funny
@Jim Kalpa According to ancient text, those wooden torpedoes were a gift from the Gods, who are also known as the Little Green Men. In fact, after giving us humans that highly advanced technology, the Little Green Men almost yanked it back in fear of destroying mankinds natural progression cycle. I'm glad I read books!
Drugs are bad - unless prescribed.
It was only 2.3 feet. You're lucky you lived this long.
Damn, friend, how old you are and how well you have learned the new information technologies, look, you even have a UA-cam channel! surely you also have social networks, and you are over 120 years old! I hope you do well with the girls too hahaha
I was a pilot of the worlds deepest diving submersible at the time. DSV 4 Sea Cliff. 20,000 foot capable submersible. It was designed to sink to the bottom. 16,000 feet is my deepest dive.
How did you get into that line of work?
@@andrewthomson Joined the Navy. Went through Electronics schools, Dive school etc.... Volunteered Subs. Served a 4 year tour on an SSN. Decided I didn't want to be just another body scrubbing decks. So I took advantage of an opportunity that presented itself and forced a Detailer into giving me orders to the Submersible command that the LCDR I was working with was going to be the Officer In Charge of. Qualified Co-Pilot, then Pilot. Can't do that anymore as they got rid of everything: DSV's 3 and 4, DSRV's... All of it. Sea Cliff, Turtle, Mystic and Avalon. All gone. It all sits in the Keyport Wa Museum parking lot next to the Trieste. I'm finishing up this in an Underwater Acoustics Ocean Engineering Position. Almost done. What a ride!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yeah, no thanks. You’d never catch me doing that. 😅
@@usmcpound It was a rare opportunity that led to an unbelievable ride. And I'm an adrenaline junky... 😊
Love💗🇷🇺Russian peopel for Saporting inda 🙏🙏😊 love from india🇮🇳🇮🇳
Your english.....
@@varunmenon1246 just ignore him. What can you expect from a Madrasa educated ass hole🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@sandeepkumarsahoo7283 really dude!!!
It’s all about money, trust me the majority if Russia hates India and your skin coulour. I’m just being honest.
yes china 🇨🇳 india 🇮🇳 russia 🇷🇺 are true allies brotherhood
the real diving performances from the military submarines are never public known: this is a deep secret...
How deep?
Deep enough
VERY deep...
Nope... The Test and Crush depths of a Trident are only Confidential... The lowest of the 3 levels of Naval security classifications. Because those depths are not very difficult to discern if you have actually built your own submarines. Russia has built many subs. They are fully aware of the approximate realistic depths to which military submarines are capable... Because they have built their own... The ocean is the constant. Technology and metallurgy can only do so much against the pressure of the oceans. Regardless of nationality.... Take it from an old boomer squid. Those depths are NOT the hilarious 5000 or 10,000 meters these fools on here are claiming... So while the limits ARE classified, they are not highly classified
And all these subs can probably go deeper than what we civilians know about. Good video overall ! And very pleasant voice! Lol.
Why... Thankyou
Yes, crush depth.
Test depth is the maximum safe tested depth. Exact crush depth is a bit of an unknown. It's predicted based on calculations, but it's impossible to prove without, ya know, CRUSHING IT. And at close to crush depth, even small condition changes could result in the sub sustaining damage or crushing.
Crush depth is usually another 30-50% deeper than test depth. In war, a sub commander could decide to go deeper than test depth to get away from hostiles, at increased risk of damage or crush.
Usually the max depth is around 500 to 1000 ft more.
@@thebuzz4108 There is Test Depth which is the maximum depth at which the submarine is allowed to operate during peace time and is dictated by its structure.
Then Crush Depth is the depth at which the submarine's hull will not be able to sustain the pressure and will crush.
These figures are 2/3 of crush depth of US Submarines and 4/7 of crush depth for British Submarines.
As an example, if the test depth of a Sub is 600 meters (~ 2000 ft), its crush depth is 900 meters (~ 3000 ft) if the Submarine is American.
@@hatman4818 There is Test Depth which is the maximum depth at which the submarine is allowed to operate during peace time and is dictated by its structure.
Then Crush Depth is the depth at which the submarine's hull will not be able to sustain the pressure and will crush.
These figures are 2/3 of crush depth of US Submarines and 4/7 of crush depth for British Submarines.
As an example, if the test depth of a Sub is 600 meters (~ 2000 ft), its crush depth is 900 meters (~ 3000 ft) if the Submarine is American.
Just going to say this without any elaboration... The Seawolf can dive a lot deeper and go a lot faster than this video claims. I would know, I was on it.
figured most of the subs on the list do, or at least the more modern ones. got to save some of those juicy goverment secrets
You just divulged national security information on UA-cam.
🐺
@@kingsleyzissou5881 no he didn't
@@kirinyardberry1324 I'm joking.
Russia's deepest submarine is the A-12, which could dive to a depth of 6,000m (about 18,000 feet)
Russias deepest diving submarines are the Mir-1 and Mir-2. Test depth over 6,100m.
These things were used for exploring the Titanic for example.
@@Scramasax Ни надо путать батискаф с подводной лодкой
!
@@aleksandrvix1890 "АС-12, известная также как «Лошарик» - российская сверхсекретная глубоководная атомная подводная лодка, не несущая вооружения и способная погружаться, по некоторым данным, на глубину до 6000 метров" как бы понятно кто топ в этом топе=)))
@@Scramasax maybe they can find the Titan Submersible
@@zendiimeit was already found.. imploded.. scattered among the debris of the Titanic..
You showed an "astute" class british attack sub for a Chinese sub lol. %hit happens lol.
"Borei," also "Dolgorukiya," on behalf of the head ship class, is a series of Russian nuclear submarines (cruisers) class strategic missile cruiser (RCSN) of the 4th generation.
Yuri Dolgorukiy is a he (-ya suggests feminine)
@@andreimoutchkine5163 all ships are referred to as 'she' you are welcome.
@@Aengrod "Dolgorukiy" is correct, not "Dolgorukiya".
@@Aengrod This is Russian vessel. In Russia, and almost all East Europe countries vessels/vehicles are HE, not SHE. So, he is not wrong, regardless of writing in English. Writing in other languages does not change my customs. You are velcome...
@@jerromedrakejr9332 Russia is not civilized, never was. Couldn't care less of your 'customs'. You are welcome.
Here's the thing. When it comes to attack and ballistic submarines, it's not about depth but stealth.
it's related. There are different ocean currents at different depths, forming layers, and sound is not always conductive from one layer to another, so to speak, due to differences in temperatures between them.
I've always thought that the deepest diving of all is the Yellow Submarine!!!
No, just the HIGHEST!
Is that the one with screen doors
I am here because the Indonesian submarine Nanggala 402
ternyata bisa 490 m, eh tapi mungkin keluaran barunya kali
@@hendraenhawe7063 keluaran baru tapi kalo udah sampe 800m ya tetep ga bisa bertahan
RIP
You miss Japan`s "Soryu" class submarine in the top 10 list. Her operation depth is about 900 meters, and she should listed as No.1.
No.1. в мире является советская атомная субмарина К-278 «Комсомолец», рабочая глубина 1000 м , максимальная 1250 м.
The deepest submarine ever is "Komsomolets" - 1027 m (August 4, 1985). Sank in 1989 due to the fire accident onboard.
@@АндрейОстроушко-й7ж @Bougaev Aleksandr
「Operational Submarines in the World」
@@bougaevaleksandr1450 That was an exception, not the rule.
内緒なので言わないでいいです
Maximum test, and crush depths are always classified. They may not even be revealed to the captains, or XOs as a matter of protocol. All classified operating documentation will probably only identify operating parameters that can be fully guaranteed by the builder.
Given engineering safety factors, the ultimate limits may only be known by very few engineers, scientists, and senior naval staff.
The most probable points of rupture would likely be at welded joints, hatch interfaces, and anywhere external objects need to penetrate the pressure hull; such as periscopes, and power transmission shafts.
Well the Captain and XO must have a number to go on to not exceed that number. If that is the maximum crush/test depth or not or a decided max depth is irrelevant as that number is the maximum depth the sub can operate in anyway. So that number that the captain gets is the maximum depth of the sub even if the sub itself would be able to handle more.
Right... And on my boat, we never told the Skipper where we kept the Trident C-4 missiles.... Protocol... Sheesh! I guarantee you that no US Navy Captain of a submarine has gone to sea ignorant of his boat's capabilities....
russian subs be like,
"comrade tovarisch , how deep do you want to go?"
"Da"
I see. Its is yes meme
In russian the tovarisch means comrade ! 😉
The data given is only an assumption, as the real parameters are classified. The loveliest thing about this video is the voice of the lady. I can go on listening to her for hours, even if she is taking nonsense. Her voice is very soothing.
Every countrys: make new weapons
China: *Ctrl + c + v*
🤣
@@elimrmartian xD
right😂😂😂😉👌
XD
@@mitsubishix-2887 facts
Oscar-class: I'm the deepest-diving sub in the world!
K-278 "Komsomolets": *weakling*
The Oscar and Sierra class subs when the USSR designed and built them in the Cold War they knew that they only way to survive was: speed and depth. They were so noisy you could hear them at miles away even if they were running silent and our boats were at flank lol. They didn’t improve much in class 2 either. Unfortunately they found out the hard way the 688I were just as fast and could dive almost as deep but much quieter. Many minor collisions occurred because of close encounters with the Russian boats and boomers by accident. Simply because the Russian Captains didn’t know the American boats were there. Unfortunate risks but things that never made the news and truth is none of those skippers wanted to start WW3 it was more about the job and egos lol.
@@billgere5293 Funny i seem to remember Alfa's diving too 4,000 Feet in the early 80's. And Honeywell made mark 50. Only had a Max depth of 1,900 feet. So the 688 could do nothing.
Russian "weakling" submarines Kursk (Oscar class) and K-278 (only 1 made ever) both sunk and killed their crews
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_submarine_K-278_Komsomolets
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_submarine_Kursk_(K-141)
@@billgere5293 The 688 had terrible depth capability compared to Soviet subs. Its one of the few US subs along with the Virginia that couldn't dive as deep as the previous class. Test depth of 950 ft. Blame it on Rickover. He could've had a sub with a 2000 ft test depth had he gone with CONFORM.
@@JG-dx5wi oh I agree but they still could achieve 400m. The Russian subs on average can test over 800m. The information that is given here for the Akula’s test is in correct.
5 Russian subs in a list of 10!!
And they forgot nuclear russian submarine of project 10831 which demonstrated depth of 3000 m (yes, three thousands), while by rumors (project is classified) it can reach up to 6000.
Russian love Subs
You do realize that this list is bullshit and not at all accurate? How deep a sub can dive is one of the most heavily guarded secrets of it. This kind of infomation is not made public in the US, Russia, England, France or any other nation. Whoever made this video has no idea what their talking about. Obviously if China has the second deepest diving sub in the world. They can't even build a decent jet engine for themselves and your going to tell me they can build a sub, which is a thousand times harder to do, that can dive deeper than just one sub on earth. Yeah ok if you believe that I got some great snow skiing property for sale in southern Florida.
@@juliap.5375 hahahaha you too? Rumors and Russian rumors at that. Like I said to Munindra, if you believe that then I have some great snow skiing property in southern Florida for sale real cheap, interested? 3,000 no wait, 6,000 meters you say? hahahahah and you really believe that? Especially coming from Russia who is the best at blowing smoke up the worlds ass. You probably would believe the world is really flat and that the universe spins around the earth too. A sub that can dive 2 miles deep give me a break. You probably have no idea what kind of pressure there is at 2 miles down. At 6,000 meters the water pressure is around 8,760 psi. That is every square inch on that sub there is 8,760 pounds of pressure pushing in on it. hahahahah or a teenage to young adult bull African Elephant standing on it. If they could I mean. Sorry to burst your little bubble but those aren't rumors you heard but the usual Russian flat out lying. Hhahahah even the idiots who made up this fictional list knew better than to include some Russian fantasy so they didn't forget, They just didn't want their list to look any more stupid then it already did. It's bad enough as it is. hahaha I have to thank you for making me laugh though. Thank you. hahahah still laughing.
t74 guard is pissed bc US is not on top of the List lol
The type 096 broke the new record with testing depth and entering service in the near future
The most insane thing in this video, is the dude kayaking in 1 meter waves..
..or trying to understand the girl's accent..
Just spent 20 seconds scrubbing my screen due to your avatar. So I will forever downvote any post I see from you :p
The picture shown at 5:17 is a British Astute class submarine, not the Chinese one you were talking about.
During WWII, lip flapping was the reason the title "Silent Service" became necessary.
It amazes me how a naval vessel as large as this can ever be considered “silent”.
Once on station they move fairly slowly. Cavitation on the propeller would give away their position so the propeller turns very slowly. Most nuclear subs operate below the thermocline which varies depending on the location in the oceans.
The Chinese one I absolutely don't believe. They are a good two decades behind in noise abatement. Electric subs are very quiet ambush predators, they turn their diesel engines off. The nuclear subs are pretty damn quiet going 30+ knots if they are deep enough to avoid cavitation - but they will never be as quiet as a diesel electric.
@@billydonaldson6483 Only near the surface, and it depends how you define "most nuclear subs" as it has more to do with role than powerplant.
You loose the K-278 "Komsomolets" sub, the only build up submarine of pr. 685 in the Soviet Navy, that hit 1027 meters undersea in 4 august 1985.
The is no US torpedo that could reach this sub at depth. I'll take that over stealth any day.
Komsomolets is not currently in service
@@jespereriksson4651 No sh*t mate, it's at the bottom of the Norwegian sea.
Being able to hold pressure and navigates with stability a half a kilometer in the ocean under the waves is pretty impressive
The soviets had a sub with a crush depth of 1,500m it sunk from a fire, but still.
I'm gonna guess packing a set of drumsticks in your kit and bringing them aboard one's sub is banned.
wtf? where is the USSR submarine K-278 "KOMSOMOLETS" ? the absolute record for diving depth among submarines - 1027 meters
You will find answer in the title of the video...
wtf? You are wrong. Absolute record belongs to your country - USA submarine USS Scorpion (SSN-589). Her record is diving to depth 3000 meters near Azor Islands. So, it dove, crashed, and never surfaced, together with entire crew. But your anti-russian propaganda hides it from you.
@@AlexanderTch he crash no deep
@@imtitanium6691 of course. USS Scorpion sank together with entire crew.
@@andrelabbe5315 Who he? Scorpion? I repeat. USS Scorpion sank at depth 3000 meters and crashed.
'Test depth' has different meanings depending on the navy involved. Navies around the world define it anywhere between two-thirds to just one-half maximum design depth.
But since actual max design depth is secret, so, really, is the test depth.
@@neilgriffiths6427 Accurate details are. But you can get a fair estimation of the actual design depth of the submarine by looking at the pressure rating of the steel used in its construction, plus the official test depth ratings for each navy. HY-80 for example, used in most western subs during the cold war, has a rating of about 550mts (the USS Thresher, built on this steel, had a test depth of 400 mts; now if we take the US Navy's two thirds test depth rating, that would mean that the design depth of the then Thresher-Class, was 600 mts, and Thresher herself imploded at around 730 mts). Cheers.
They forgot the russian Alfa-Class with estimated dive depth of 900m, and 41 knots speed.
Unreachable for western Torpedoes!
"c'mon, shoot me if you can!"
Yes everything about Russian hardware is estimated and speculative. 41 knots submerged speed is a joke .Alpha class are no longer in operation.
@@barracuda7018 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfa-class_submarine
The last Alfa was decommissioned and scraped in 1996 so they are no longer operational.
That was true, at the times when first alfa class went operational, most torpedoes top speed usually stays at 35 knots max, but shortly after the alfa class specs fully collected, also on one occasion, alfas were caught speeding at 40s knots, most NATO nations started to fielding 50s knot torpedoes, UK spearfish with 70 knots as well as mk 48 adcap at 65 knots as two examples.. With 600 meters of maximum target depth to boot.. If those coldwar specs/stories are to be used as a reference in the least..
@@barracuda7018 41 knots is indeed a joke, it was 43.7 knots at 97% output- they stopped there because everything started shaking rather unpleasantly. It was a twin reactor design fully titanium to make it as light as possible, its as close as you get to a truly racing submarine.
Nothing about it is estimated or speculative, they are painstakingly monitored and tracked. Alfa was very easy to track because it wasn't exactly a quiet submarine, but it was too fast to do anything about at the time.
They even considered liquid metal reactors to go even faster, but they went for the tried and true. It was disgustingly expensive.
Go speak to some submariners who were involved in recording data on her.
You know they are all capable of going all the way to the bottom at any time.
THEIR NOT.... .
The subs that my country have can dive into the center of the inner core of the Sun.
Yes I imagine the bottom is better coz they never come back up
@Logan Hughes Sucks to not be able to identify a joke,
'Engage the Catterpillar drive!" - Captain Raimius
That would be "caterpillar" and "Ramius" for those who are keeping score.
“We shail into histry”
then start to sing...........
I am here for some reason too.
Самая быстрая (К-222), самая глубоководная (К-278), самая крупная (проект 941 «Акула») и самая скрытная лодка (проект 945А «Кондор») были созданы именно в СССР.
Сейчас в России актуальны яхты ! чем длиннее и больше ,тем лучше !
@@antibiotickprojeckt2660 это уже не смешно, вы опоздали с этой шуткой на 15 лет, более того оно имеет глупую риторику. 1-Яхты тоже корабли и их строить нужно уметь.
2 По вашим тезисам яхты должны покупаться за кордоном ибо мы их делать не должны уметь.
Soviet propaganda. They always claim everything is better than the USA, which is how you know every word is a lie
@@chaosXP3RT, you might realise that your statements sound either like a manipulation trick or a logical fallacy. You first make the wrong assumption/overgeneralisation ("They always claim everything is better than the USA..."), incorrectly attribute it to your opponent(s) and then refute it.
To get a balanced opinion on the Soviet/Russian military, it is important to bear in mind that both sides are biased and one should look not only at Western sources of information but Russian ones as well (you need to know Russian to do that seriously).
Each coin has two sides and if you see one side of the coin, this does not mean you know how the whole coin looks.
@@alexeysergeev2151 Russian GRU-officers (joke) say that Russia's deepest submarine is the A-12, which could dive to a depth of 6,000m (about 18,000 feet)
French army is clear : real dive capacity are never communicated. When you heard our officers they allways say the average known depth of all the concurrence and the typical ( and official) phrase is " we dive at least to 400" ( probably much more)
So this kind of vid is totally irrelevant.
Cette une vidéo complètement inutile parce que la profondeur est une donnée classifié.
@@michelguenin Nan mais tkt, la prochaine vidéo, c'est les signatures acoustique des SNLE du monde
That paddle boarder is misleading, they must be a giant 😂
Will you ever do a face reveal? We want to see who makes all these great videos.
Possibly Melissa Hurt. Maybe , I really don't know.
@TRITONX what is your nationality ?
@@knowledge8676 indian bro
@@dannywainwrightq7828 How is she melissa hurt? The buzz said she lives in shillong.
@@tritonx5433 oo. I am Indian too.
আমিও ভারতীয়। From Santiniketan, West Bengal.
শান্তিনিকেতন, পশ্চিমবঙ্গ।
You should have glued photos of each submarine on a wall and threw darts at them it would have been more accurate then the information in this vid
I’ve got a friend who works in the submarines for the Royal Navy even he doesn’t know how deep the submarines go it’s top-secret need to know
Maybe they keep that from you Brits, but on American boats it is merely Confidential. Hell. The Test and Crush Depth was a question at my qual board.
I think the Russians already assume that they go to the Marianas Trench depth, so it's pretty irrelevant.
a nation will never give the maximum depth of their submarines this is a very well kept military secret
yep correct
When I was a child I thought submarine dives near the sea floor 😭🤣
What's funny it's normal to think all sort of things when you are little
Yes
you were right as well, they do. but they just dont come up if they have passed there depth. lol
It does. As long as the sea floor isn't too far away.
@@Garchist let him keep that child hood dream ' Yeh submarines can sit on the deepest ocean floor' (may not return to surface)
Any submarine can reach any depth. But only one time.
The titan topped all of these
Submesible are not submarines. Titan was a submersible made like a submarine with carbon fiber. What can go wrong.
@@surf2257 /r/whoosh
Think of this as the tip of the iceberg.
The diesel subs are very impressive.
As an Indian I am proud that we are not holding any records regarding any sea or ocean based
Human : How deep is your love?
Submarine : How deep you can dive?
Adele: Rolling in the Deep.
Служил срочную службу КТОФ 1981- 1984 Б- 641 , Р- 29- 21
Вас можно поздравить за службу в ПК53
All test depths are classified, these YT videos are goofy.
Test depths are what engineers say is safe. They're very conservative about it, the boats can likely exceed that by 25%.
A former submariner told me about a boat that exceeded its listed depth by several fathoms. It returned to port several feet longer than it was before the trip. The proof of this was that it could no longer fit into its dock space/pen.
Well KRI Nanggala 402 of Type 209 sure as heck can’t withstand 800m of pressure
@@khxbunkhxp8010 yeah, specs give a test depth of 500m.
I’m a bit claustrophobic so I would have to have a room with a window I could open ANYTIME I wanted. Cheers!
You forgot about the AS-31 Losharik. That one has a test depth of 2,500 meters.
For a submarine, and not a submersible, that is unheard of.
Nanggala 402 crushed at 600m . RIP
+800m
@@alfiansori4003 they was found at 800m+ , crushed at 600m
These are official published depths. Most of these subs can safely dive deeper but the max safe depth is top secret info.
Test depth is max operational depth in peacetime, which is fine. They aren't difficult to verify.
0:17 Does anyone else get the creepy feeling that that sub with all the barnacles is a tomb that they found at the bottom of the sea?
I wouldn't want to get inside that.
Thats an alfa class XD
Many Thanks
Sierra-I - class - 550m
Sierra-II, Akula, Oscar - class - 600m
Mike - class - 1027m - Record
@Serge SG hello serge wherefrom you have this dates?
No nation will say their dept, it's top secret. Seawolf has dept of more than 6000 feet!
No. It doesn't
hey man US never caught up with russia lot of mistake in depth measurement
akula can reach 600m (full payload)
yasen also tested for 600m (full payload)
seawolf maximum test depth is 480m.(not payload mentioned)
You know Russia steals
@@goodday381
You know USA steals.
@@vadrak6197 yeah we stole info on the F-22 from............ ok we stole info on the F-35 from........ Ok we stole info on the quitest nuclear sub in the world from............... Wait, how can we steal from others when they don't have what we do? I mean you can't have the best by stealing because no one else has what you do. Well VaDrak looks like you are blowing smoke up everyone's ass. Think maybe your Russian. Before anybody says anything I know Sweden has probably the quitest sub in the world but it isn't nuclear. My point is when you have things like Stealth technology and have had it for 20+ years, and no one else still has it, how in the hell could the info have been stolen? Make absolutly no sense at all. That is just one of many examples of what I am talking about. Blow your smoke elsewhere VaDrak, nobody here is buying it.
Well like many here have been saying, information about how deep a sub can dive is highly classified information and nobody except those that are suppose to know, knows it. You have no idea the depth the Akula or Yasen or Seawolf can dive. Whatever source you got that from has no idea either. Most likely just guesses at what it might be. The US doesn't need to catch up with Russia in how deep a sub can go. The US has a huge advantage when it comes to how quiet a sub is and there is no better issue when it comes to subs than how quiet it is. To this day a Ohio class ballistic submarine has never been successfully tracked by a Russian or any other country sub. And the Ohip class subs have been around for several decades. When it comes to the Seawolfs and Virginia class subs, forget it they don't stand a chance in finding one of them outside of being extremely lucky. On the other hand Los Angeles class subs track and even follow Russian subs all over the place. Most of the time unnoticed. So if the US is a little behind, which I doubt, in how deep their subs can dive compared to the Russian subs I say who cares. No where near as important as being more quiet.
@@t74guard78 Yea you leave out the names of the operations where the US stole the technology, lol!
Project Azorian? US has stolen entire Russian submarines so they could reverse engineer and copy Russian technology?
Project Diamond? Project Have Doughnut? So we know for a fact the US stole every MIG ever built. And used Russian science and math to develop low radar cross sections for aircraft? Is that not what Lockheed tells us how they did it?
I agree makes no sense at all to leave the proof and facts throughout history out. Cos you would have to pretend you didn't steal the technology when all the US military looks like a copy of other countries stuff? lmao!
The Soviet nuclear submarine K-278 "Komsomolets" belongs to the submarines of the 3rd generation, it is the only submarine of the project 685 "Fin". On August 4, 1985, she set an absolute record for diving depth among submarines - 1027 meters.
Before the Ukraine they could take on NATO/China/India/ Elon musk all at the same time. I DONT BELIEVE ANYTHING abt Russia
Probably more important is that torpedoes operate even deeper.
Yea but what they gonna hit?
again, so nice voice. kiss from croatia, mddle europe 😍👠💋💔❤🔥
I love these videos, well done guts. Good info
Full of mistakes and probably false info too.
Russian K-278 Komsomolets (Project 685 "Plavnik" or Mike class) - nuclear-powered attack submarine wich had reached a depth of 1,027 meters back in 1984.
That's a first place actually.
Russia's deepest submarine is the A-12, which could dive to a depth of 6,000m (about 18,000 feet)
Who has best submarines us or Russia ?
The Virginia block 4 is the best submarine right now but Russia and us build a fifth gen of subs like Columbia and borei but us say that Columbia it will be the best subs ever
Krasnodar and Belgorod what about those ?
UK RUSSIA
German
Singularity - maybe on the non nuclear ones? I don’t know who else builds submarines with a H2 fuel cell
You missed out the Australian Oxley class submariner. With a depth capacity of almost 100 metres. And can be heard for over 200 km away. 🙃🙃
Ha ha ha ausie wit brill
Ha ha ha ausie witt, brill.
unfortunately they cant add submarines meant to kill civilians maybe when they develop a better crew training they can add it
Do they serve kangaroos on board? 🙃
Sounds like a suicide submarine.
And you actually believe they would tell you the actual operating depths Pull the other one!!!!
I'm thinking they have no idea how deep the Seawolf can go.
How deep or how fast, 3 different test platforms. Amazing boats.
Who could believe this ?
Where you got these figures ?
LOL
SO CUTE your VOICE The Buzz
Soviet "Mike" class -- test depth 1250 m.
French *Trieste* reached 11,521 m but this was later corrected to 10,916 m.
In *1960!!!*
@@WadcaWymiaru we are talking about military subs not Bathyscaphes
designed for TD of 1,250, but only tested 1,000m. This is only operational subs.
@@WadcaWymiaru Swiss design, Italian built, Italian named, sold to the US. What do you mean FRENCH Trieste?
I admire people being brave and going on adventures.
Going in a sub tho. That's pure madness
Did 15 years on them.......(UK)
@@goldenlabradorskye braver than me !
Took me 2 years to get used to civilian life. Just ask the wife.
日本の潜水艦が世界で一番深く潜航でき、魚雷においても世界で一番深い場所から発射できます
魚雷が1000ｍの深さでも使えるらしいからね。一般の魚雷は数百メートルで使えなくなるって誰かが言ってた。
The Russians yet again! They love it down there skulking at the bottom of the ocean 🤣 All jokes aside they are incredible machines being able to withstand the immense pressures down there!
K-278 Komsomolets. Only one has been built. 1250m.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_submarine_K-278_Komsomolets
@@Brewney 1 built...1 sank. No longer able to be counted.
@@burnerjack01 records don't go away just because its no longer in service. Otherwise we would strip all athletes of their medals when they die, no? there is no such thing as "world record holder weightlifter or 100m sprint 'still alive'" no, it just world record holder, period.
@@dataman6744 So, who is the 9th rated 100m Sprint record holder from 1957?
@@dataman6744 true, but the video was about subs that were in active service at the time of making it. so technically, the K-278 doesn't count because it wasn't in active service.
"Soryu Class" are over 900m.
Nope, they can't.500m tops.
Their main armament Type 89 heavyweight torpedo can be operated in a depth of 2953 feet.
それは防秘です。消されるゾ。(^o^;)
Only the torpedoes.
Myth!
That's why russian don't fear of american super carriers
And wouldn't they i think anyone would but it not only the u.s we have two new uk carriers as well which i think is already being stocked with f35 the hms prince of wales and the hms queen Elizabeth so good luck to them
@@simo-rn2tw can your fancy f35 survive underwater 200 meters
A Russian, an American and a British at an Harbour talk about which Sub will last longest:The British:Ours will doing best, only need to surface when Tea is empty!! The American: We only surface when our Whiskey is empty!! The Russian; We need to go up if the Wodka is done....suddenly you hear a Sound .....Tuck Tuck Tuck....an German WW2 Typ VII C/41 Sub enters the Harbour, Captains comes out and asks: You got some Schnaps here???
Submarines are a pretty crazy concept if you think about it 🤯
This person really like submarine👍
What happened to the "Mike"?
Test depth 1000 meters.
Crash depth 1500 meters.
The only combat submarine that has such a submersion depth was only the Soviet nuclear submarine Komsomolets, it had a working depth of 1000 meters and a maximum depth of 1250
@@nikgrey7334 Called "Mike" at NATO.
Russian no 1 , from indonesian 🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
Original depth is classified
I think you mean official.
Nice
Where are Japanese submarines
海自潜水艦の最大潜航深度は未公表です。
The maximum dive depth for Japanese submarines has not been announced.
In the bottom of Pearl Harbor
Ooops
in Japan, obviously
Huge grain of salt on all of this info... do you really think these submarines performance would not be classified... really? 😂
And this entire list is probably mostly wrong, for the simple fact, that any information on what depths these submarines can go, be it test, operational, or maximum depths, it's all classified, the public at large will never know.
I'm willing to bet that even many of the crew on those subs don't know how deep their subs can dive, with information known only to a select few of the crew and officers.
LooseCannon did say some of the crew know and just because one might know how deep they are, it doesn't mean he or she knows how deep it can go. I agree with LooseCannon because this is a very closely guarded secret. A few on the sub may know but not many. Whoever made this list has no idea which subs dive deeper. Can't you tell by it's choice for second. A Chinese non nuclear sub. Please give me a break.
@Matthew Huszarik An LA class has a crew of around 120+. So they put in 100s of depth gages? Or do they all huddle around the one depth gage in the really big room subs always have? lol!
Nah you dare one of those crew to take a picture and tweet it? Then you know for a fact.
Then tell Kristian Saucier onboard the USS Alexandria to go inside the nuclear reactor room and make pics all around.
When the FBI and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service show up at his door? Don't respond to his emails and just ghost his ass. Else you end up in jail too? ;-)
How about Mike class ? Test depth 1250 meters ;)
@Serge SG agree😂. They miss this sub
James Cameron: Laughter from the Mariana trench