10 Deepest Diving Operational Submarines in the World | Submarines With Maximum Test Depth

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,1 тис.

  • @kinster02
    @kinster02 3 роки тому +1588

    As a former US submariner, I would say that the only people that know how deep a submarine can really go are dead.

    • @heyhoe168
      @heyhoe168 3 роки тому +38

      I suspect it may vary even between subs within class. Simply due to strains accumulated during service.

    • @pasta8709
      @pasta8709 3 роки тому +42

      These had to be the tip of the iceberg, its doesn't sound real that the deepest sub was made during the cold war. Obviously there is deeper submarine that's still classified.

    • @heyhoe168
      @heyhoe168 3 роки тому +23

      @@pasta8709 not necessarily. War budgets were cut after the cold war. A lot of projects has been tossed in the "not today" box.

    • @kinster02
      @kinster02 3 роки тому +18

      @@brandenstangle320 Well, as a retired vet of the US navy silent service, I'll say they are pretty darn close.

    • @TheGecko213
      @TheGecko213 3 роки тому +5

      @@kinster02
      No, I would put the real depth as twice the published figures.
      But no one has returned back alive to tell how deep a submarine really went before it got crushed :))))

  • @adampark9979
    @adampark9979 4 роки тому +1692

    Technically, all submarines can reach the bottom of the ocean.

  • @TheTemplier24
    @TheTemplier24 4 роки тому +830

    All submarines have a secret performance margin for use only in wartime.

    • @HoursFreeAOLsp
      @HoursFreeAOLsp 4 роки тому +36

      +/-20 percent at least I bet.

    • @leefithian3704
      @leefithian3704 4 роки тому +17

      Where the chief ties a clothesline tightly inside and it gets looser the deeper you go lol 😂, on a side note Seawolf takes roughly , no less than 47 orca adult orca skins to cover entire vessel

    • @EricThompson1965
      @EricThompson1965 4 роки тому +9

      Really? And where might you have come across this information?

    • @TheTemplier24
      @TheTemplier24 4 роки тому +28

      @@EricThompson1965 It is in a secret Russian report about the American Ohio class submarines.

    • @TheTemplier24
      @TheTemplier24 4 роки тому +4

      @ True, in chinese factories by abused children !!!!!!!

  • @muhammadhaikal-oc3tc
    @muhammadhaikal-oc3tc 3 роки тому +78

    Pray for kri nanggala 402....indonesia submarine...53 people died...pray for them all.😔😔

  • @jebbroham1776
    @jebbroham1776 4 роки тому +171

    Keep in mind that "test depth" is deceiving. The builders design them to withstand a certain pressure for a set amount of time, yet many Kriegsmarine Uboat captains in the Atlantic reported exceeding even the estimated crush depth of their submarines on several occasions without the pressure hulls failing while evading depth charges from overhead destroyers. The true combat diving capabilities of all military subs in service is absolutely classified. Who in their right mind would develop something that is supposed to be a step ahead of their rivals and then make that information public? Nobody.

    • @xmeda
      @xmeda 4 роки тому +11

      Many Kriegsmarine captains also were crushed by the deep waters, so they had no chance to report anything.
      It always depends on condition of the hull. Sometimes it survived few deep dives and then it failed surprisingly during next attempt.

    • @taraswertelecki3786
      @taraswertelecki3786 4 роки тому +18

      All true. Test depth is merely the maximum depth a submarine can operate safely ALL THE TIME, assuming the pressure hull, hull valves and anything else that communicates with the surrounding water was not damaged in some way. A submarine can go much deeper than it's rated test depth, but skippers for obvious reasons do not do that lightly. In combat though they take risks that they would not take in peacetime, even though submarines in general always operate on a war footing. One only see photos of the mangled wreckage of the U.S.S Thresher and Scorpion to see the fate that awaits any submarine that falls below collapse depth. U-boats during WW-2 were built to operate to about 500 feet, but descended to 1,000 feet to evade co-ordinated depth charge attacks from a hunter-killer group above. A depth charge exploding near the hull was always fatal.

    • @georgekraus9357
      @georgekraus9357 4 роки тому +4

      In WWII, a diving depth of U.S. subs was classified from Japan until one Congressman opened his mouth ....

    • @scarling9367
      @scarling9367 4 роки тому +3

      @@georgekraus9357 Something like that happened in the 90's, I believe. The US only claimed 400' on its subs, then some Admiral was giving a briefing to the news and let slip that they were at 800'...ooops.

    • @rogervonschleusingen4603
      @rogervonschleusingen4603 3 роки тому +1

      THE US, WE GIVE , SELL ( NOT REALLY ) ,OFFER TO CHINA ON A REGULAR BASES,......IN THE NAME OF FREEDOM ..OFCOURSE !!! DO YOUR HOME WORK ..SHEEPLE !!

  • @EricThompson1965
    @EricThompson1965 4 роки тому +246

    I was a Sonar Tech aboard the USS Henry M. Jackson SSBN 730...A Trident submarine...This popped up recommended by UA-cam. I only began watching because, as many others have commented, the Test and Crush depths of at least a U.S. Navy submarine are classified. Granted, of the 3 levels of classified material, Confidential, Secret and Top Secret, test depth of a boat is merely Confidential, and is not difficult to discern. But for a UA-cam poster to claim to have such knowledge as this for 10 different military submarines is ludicrous.

    • @EricThompson1965
      @EricThompson1965 4 роки тому +27

      Not to mention that since I know exactly what the Test and Crush depths of a Trident submarine are, that the Ohio class is not mentioned in this list, as it would be by the depths indicated by the poster of the video, merely proves just how inaccurate it is

    • @TERoss-jk9ny
      @TERoss-jk9ny 4 роки тому +2

      Eric T: Ditto for Jimmy Carter.... This is a joke, and it’s dangerous. Ignorance might be bliss, but this bs will get people killed.

    • @MrBonners
      @MrBonners 4 роки тому +3

      ex-ops room radar operator: we got the sonar data along with EW input to make the sit-plot. A copy of Jane's Fighting Ships was always there, now all on-line. The published data of ships are the manufactures for cruising operation. Actual capability in speed and depth in fighting mode is at the maximum of +/- specifications and the nerve of the captain. Those specs are always somewhat unknown. Add 10% for temporary extreme performance is the usual assumption.

    • @petert3355
      @petert3355 4 роки тому +9

      Yeah, I've sent off a request to UA-cam for a copy of this video so I can use it for fertiliser.
      It's chock full of BS

    • @tfish0
      @tfish0 4 роки тому +1

      only got the first one right...greater than..should have put a (>) symbol on all

  • @montieluckett7036
    @montieluckett7036 4 роки тому +105

    When out to sea, we always remember this. Two things- #1. The fire department will never get to you fast enough to help, no matter the situation. #2. The furthest you will ever be from land is only a little over seven miles, dry land is another consideration.

    • @jimmywrangles
      @jimmywrangles 3 роки тому

      Lol

    • @badlandskid
      @badlandskid 3 роки тому

      Hahaha

    • @t1ny03
      @t1ny03 Рік тому

      Fire department?? SmH.
      You do realise even clowns like chefs have active roles in firefighting & damage control & are trained as such in the military.

    • @snaubdca7yebf
      @snaubdca7yebf Рік тому +1

      this is not funny today

  • @rakhaambigram
    @rakhaambigram 3 роки тому +133

    Pray to Nanggala 402 Sub Marine

  • @nicholasmills772
    @nicholasmills772 4 роки тому +339

    who seriously believes these figures. The official figures are kept secret.

    • @eldarkarimov6717
      @eldarkarimov6717 4 роки тому +1

      Yeee...

    • @dannygjk
      @dannygjk 4 роки тому +12

      True but those numbers are probably close to actual. Engineers can make good estimates based on what they know about the materials used and other facts about the designs which can't realistically be kept secret.

    • @davem5333
      @davem5333 4 роки тому +14

      Depth capability is greatly overrated. It may help get under a thermocline to bounce the sound. But the depth capability means the sub is able to withstand explosive pressure from depth charges.
      The important factor is quietness. If they can't hear you they can't find you.

    • @robertfrost1683
      @robertfrost1683 4 роки тому

      @@davem5333 no more depth charges

    • @commentor2594
      @commentor2594 4 роки тому

      okay dont watch

  • @manuelbauerle2182
    @manuelbauerle2182 Рік тому +34

    500m?
    Ocean gate:
    Hold my game controller 😮

    • @lstoboy
      @lstoboy Рік тому

      nowadays jokes

    • @Juho-uf8si
      @Juho-uf8si 4 місяці тому

      this did not age great...

  • @Yadavaskshatrap438
    @Yadavaskshatrap438 4 роки тому +74

    Love💗🇷🇺Russian peopel for Saporting inda 🙏🙏😊 love from india🇮🇳🇮🇳

    • @varunmenon1246
      @varunmenon1246 4 роки тому +3

      Your english.....

    • @sandeepkumarsahoo7283
      @sandeepkumarsahoo7283 4 роки тому +1

      @@varunmenon1246 just ignore him. What can you expect from a Madrasa educated ass hole🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @HolmesOO7
      @HolmesOO7 3 роки тому +1

      @@sandeepkumarsahoo7283 really dude!!!

    • @bulletproofguy5112
      @bulletproofguy5112 3 роки тому +5

      It’s all about money, trust me the majority if Russia hates India and your skin coulour. I’m just being honest.

    • @donjobi9400
      @donjobi9400 3 роки тому +2

      yes china 🇨🇳 india 🇮🇳 russia 🇷🇺 are true allies brotherhood

  • @Subpac_ww2
    @Subpac_ww2 4 роки тому +69

    Every boat is as good as it's welds, and every boat, same class or not, has a unique crush depth. It isn't unusual for a submarine to be capable of twice it's "test depth" Our boats back on the 30s and 40s would, in a pinch, go well beyond their rated depths.

    • @JD-re3cj
      @JD-re3cj 2 роки тому

      One bad weld, one little drop of paint, the lives of the crew depend on millions of parts all working exactly as intended- which is why I could never feel comfortable on board a submarine during a dive. I like the sea but not being underneath it thank you 🫳

    • @fiftycal1
      @fiftycal1 Рік тому +6

      I’ve a BS in Chemistry 🧪. Knowing how hard Titanium is to work with - I’m impressed The Russkies were able to build an entire sub from the Element. It also has the advantage of being non-magnetic - making MAD detection almost impossible. The Akula Class also used a Liquid Sodium Cooled Reactor. This is great for achieving a compact reactor. However - Sodium reacts vigorously with water - even more so in a molten state. You’re trying to keep absolutely all water out - when you’re totally surrounded by it.
      The US has a hard time working with Titanium. When building The SR-71 - it was found even the trace amount of cadmium left behind by cadmium plated wrenches would cause bolts to fail. Tracing lines with Pentel Markers would leave behind trace amounts of ink - that sometimes had components that could cause welds to fail. Welds washed off with water during the summer tended to fail more often than those in winter - which had to do with amount of Chlorine in the water. So they switched to distilled water to rinse off parts.

    • @Fido-vm9zi
      @Fido-vm9zi Рік тому +1

      So best subs would be constructed of a continuous material with as little welds as possible?

    • @gasbaroni
      @gasbaroni Рік тому

      @@JD-re3cj I would imagine that they are using x-ray to ensure the quality of the welds.

    • @islamisthetruewaytogod6812
      @islamisthetruewaytogod6812 Рік тому

      Hello ! May Allah protect and guide you to his light and happiness in this life and the hereafter, God bless, Ameen. Excuse me for giving a little presentation of Islam, because it is very misunderstood nowadays, especially on those « Antichrist's » times, where media and politics are mixed to distort history and truth. And terrorists (puppets of the Antichrist) who misinterpret verses, out of ignorance and political motivations, and take them out of historical context (just like radical atheists do by the way), don't help either. Thank you very much for your time.
      Islam is an arabic word that means the Surrender to the One and Only God, our Creator, Protector, Provider, who gives us life and all that we have, we are safe and sound by his will and grace, we are His and to Him we return, and we have to thank him in this trial life by submitting to him by our free will, or later in the Day of judgment when it's too late to save our own skin. Islam was the original Religion descended to earth from heaven with Adam and Eve (peace and blessing be upon them) in the beginning of humanity. and was passed to people with the succession of the 124 000 prophets and 315 messengers of God to all nations and civilizations since, passing by Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Ismaël, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Joshua, David, Solomon and Jesus (Peace and blessing be upon them) during the history of mankind, the last replaces and completes the previous, until the succession of the last messenger of God fourteen centuries ago, Muhammad (Peace and blessing be upon him) to complete the noble morals of all mankind, to bring humans and jinns out of darkness into light, and to purify people's religion and belief from corruption and polytheism, and return it to purity and true monotheism, like it was in the times of the prophets (Peace and blessing be upon them).
      Many Religions that we know nowadays, at their beginning were true and under Islam, initiated by one of the prophets of God, but their original teachings, history and scriptures have been corrupted over time with falsification and polytheism, or lost and replaced with false ones. That's why Islam is the only Religion accepted by God nowadays, which consists in bearing witness that there is no god besides Allah (God in Aramaic, the original language of Jesus and the Gospel), and that Muhammad is His servant and messenger, just like Jesus and Moses and others are His servants and messengers. Never a messenger of God said he was God or literally son of God, it was the people after him who changed the words of God and corrupted the Religion. God is unique and absolute, He does not need to have a family and sons or to associate anyone else with His kingdom, He can simply create whatever He wants, everything belongs to Him, and to Him everything will return. Allah said in Surah Al-Mu’minun : “God has never begotten a son, nor is there any god besides Him. Otherwise, each god would have taken away what it has created, and some of them would have gained supremacy over others. Glory be to God, far beyond what they describe. The Knower of the hidden and the manifest. He is exalted, far above what they associate. (91-92 / Translated by ITANI).
      Allah means the one and only God, the God of all prophets and creatures, the creator of the universe and mankind, and the Master of the Day of judgment, where our destiny, Hell or Paradise, is decided based on our faith and deeds in this trial life, and above all, Allah's mercy.
      Allah said in Surah Al-Ikhlas : In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful.
      Say, “He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He begets not, nor was He begotten. And there is none comparable to Him.” (1-4 / Translated by ITANI).
      Allah said in Surah An-Nisa : O FOLLOWERS of the Gospel! Do not overstep the bounds [of truth] in your religious beliefs, and do not say of God anything but the truth. The Christ Jesus, son of Mary, was but God's Apostle - [the fulfilment of] His promise which He had conveyed unto Mary - and a soul created by Him. Believe, then, in God and His apostles, and do not say, "[God is] a trinity". Desist [from this assertion] for your own good. God is but One God; utterly remote is He, in His glory, from having a son: unto Him belongs all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth; and none is as worthy of trust as God. Never did the Christ feel too proud to be God's servant, nor do the angels who are near unto Him. And those who feel too proud to serve Him and glory in their arrogance [should know that on Judgment Day] He will gather them all unto Himself: (171-172 / Translated by Muhammad Asad).
      Allah the Most Merciful said in Surah Ali-Imran : Behold, the only [true] religion in the sight of God is [man's] self-surrender unto Him; and those who were vouchsafed revelation aforetime took, out of mutual jealousy, to divergent views [on this point] only after knowledge [thereof] had come unto them. But as for him who denies the truth of God's messages - behold, God is swift in reckoning!
      Thus, [O Prophet,] if they argue with thee, say, "I have surrendered my whole being unto God, and [so have] all who follow me!" - and ask those who have been vouchsafed revelation aforetime, as well as all unlettered people, "Have you [too] surrendered yourselves unto Him?" And if they surrender themselves unto Him, they are on the right path; but if they turn away - behold, thy duty is no more than to deliver the message: for God sees all that is in [the hearts of] His creatures.
      Verily, as for those who deny the truth of God's messages, and slay the prophets against all right, and slay people who enjoin equity - announce unto them a grievous chastisement.
      It is they whose works shall come to nought both in this world and in the life to come; and they shall have none to succour them.
      (19-22 / Translated by Muhammad Asad)..
      Salam (Peace) -----------

  • @ренатзарипов-т5б
    @ренатзарипов-т5б 4 роки тому +118

    "Borei," also "Dolgorukiya," on behalf of the head ship class, is a series of Russian nuclear submarines (cruisers) class strategic missile cruiser (RCSN) of the 4th generation.

    • @andreimoutchkine5163
      @andreimoutchkine5163 4 роки тому +7

      Yuri Dolgorukiy is a he (-ya suggests feminine)

    • @Aengrod
      @Aengrod 4 роки тому +3

      @@andreimoutchkine5163 all ships are referred to as 'she' you are welcome.

    • @АлексейМуковников-щ1й
      @АлексейМуковников-щ1й 4 роки тому +5

      @@Aengrod "Dolgorukiy" is correct, not "Dolgorukiya".

    • @jerromedrakejr9332
      @jerromedrakejr9332 4 роки тому +5

      @@Aengrod This is Russian vessel. In Russia, and almost all East Europe countries vessels/vehicles are HE, not SHE. So, he is not wrong, regardless of writing in English. Writing in other languages does not change my customs. You are velcome...

    • @Aengrod
      @Aengrod 4 роки тому +2

      @@jerromedrakejr9332 Russia is not civilized, never was. Couldn't care less of your 'customs'. You are welcome.

  • @Swaggaccino
    @Swaggaccino 3 роки тому +173

    Komsomolets K278 reached a test depth of over 1000m and doesn’t get crushed until 1500m. Titanium is strong as hell. I’d imagine if the ships of today needed to go that deep, they'd survive.

    • @haylocktransport6695
      @haylocktransport6695 2 роки тому +11

      It can go all the way to the bottom one time .

    • @fredjones7705
      @fredjones7705 2 роки тому +3

      Titanium is not as strong as steel.

    • @Phoenix-my8sv
      @Phoenix-my8sv 2 роки тому +25

      @@fredjones7705 Chemistry and physics are taught for compression and stretching, titanium is superior to steel + low carbon content.

    • @Phoenix-my8sv
      @Phoenix-my8sv 2 роки тому +2

      @@fredjones7705 That's why our submarines are made of it, so you'll get our figs out of the water, and our ones will get it.

    • @fredjones7705
      @fredjones7705 2 роки тому +18

      @@Phoenix-my8sv Titanium has a lot of interesting properties but it is not stronger than steel. It is stronger than Aluminum. We've worked it before and it's a bitch. When you try to ablate it titanium assumes the consistancy of chewing gum and flows like Lava. Very difficult to work because it gums up your tool heads and essentialy ruins them. We can easily work a steel edge to 1/10000 inch but we were lucky to be able to spec Titanium to 1/100 inch. My hats off to the Russkies but I bet that Sub bankrupted them.

  • @roypublic3269
    @roypublic3269 2 роки тому +68

    I was a pilot of the worlds deepest diving submersible at the time. DSV 4 Sea Cliff. 20,000 foot capable submersible. It was designed to sink to the bottom. 16,000 feet is my deepest dive.

    • @andrewthomson
      @andrewthomson Рік тому +2

      How did you get into that line of work?

    • @roypublic3269
      @roypublic3269 Рік тому +21

      @@andrewthomson Joined the Navy. Went through Electronics schools, Dive school etc.... Volunteered Subs. Served a 4 year tour on an SSN. Decided I didn't want to be just another body scrubbing decks. So I took advantage of an opportunity that presented itself and forced a Detailer into giving me orders to the Submersible command that the LCDR I was working with was going to be the Officer In Charge of. Qualified Co-Pilot, then Pilot. Can't do that anymore as they got rid of everything: DSV's 3 and 4, DSRV's... All of it. Sea Cliff, Turtle, Mystic and Avalon. All gone. It all sits in the Keyport Wa Museum parking lot next to the Trieste. I'm finishing up this in an Underwater Acoustics Ocean Engineering Position. Almost done. What a ride!

    • @t1ny03
      @t1ny03 Рік тому +2

      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @usmcpound
      @usmcpound Рік тому +4

      Yeah, no thanks. You’d never catch me doing that. 😅

    • @roypublic3269
      @roypublic3269 Рік тому

      @@usmcpound It was a rare opportunity that led to an unbelievable ride. And I'm an adrenaline junky... 😊

  • @DansBackcountry
    @DansBackcountry 4 роки тому +112

    Just going to say this without any elaboration... The Seawolf can dive a lot deeper and go a lot faster than this video claims. I would know, I was on it.

    • @coreytaylor447
      @coreytaylor447 4 роки тому +9

      figured most of the subs on the list do, or at least the more modern ones. got to save some of those juicy goverment secrets

    • @kingsleyzissou5881
      @kingsleyzissou5881 4 роки тому +19

      You just divulged national security information on UA-cam.

    • @Cooltea1983
      @Cooltea1983 4 роки тому

      🐺

    • @kirinyardberry1324
      @kirinyardberry1324 4 роки тому +2

      @@kingsleyzissou5881 no he didn't

    • @kingsleyzissou5881
      @kingsleyzissou5881 4 роки тому

      @@kirinyardberry1324 I'm joking.

  • @erikh1041
    @erikh1041 3 роки тому +71

    submarines are the scariest thing i know about. the fact that they could be anywhere, and we don’t even know about it is terrifying to me

    • @Eugen_Belyaev
      @Eugen_Belyaev 3 роки тому +7

      Submarines are the most advanced types of crypts I know! ;-)

    • @gendaminoru3195
      @gendaminoru3195 3 роки тому +4

      but we do know. We monitor the exact location of Chinese subs continuously as well as those of Russia by way of several assets that we won't get into here

    • @paulmorgan8254
      @paulmorgan8254 3 роки тому +6

      the US & UK know where almost every submarine is.

    • @enoughofthis
      @enoughofthis 3 роки тому

      @@gendaminoru3195 hydrophone

    • @gendaminoru3195
      @gendaminoru3195 3 роки тому

      @@enoughofthis among others

  • @MsNina1963
    @MsNina1963 3 роки тому +19

    I am here because the Indonesian submarine Nanggala 402

  • @exnbcnco
    @exnbcnco 4 роки тому +66

    I can remember when I operated the 'Turtle' during the great war I was told I could go down to at least 3.28 feet before I risked a hull implosion. I must say things have come a long way since I fought against the red coats!

    • @EricThompson1965
      @EricThompson1965 4 роки тому +6

      Now that's funny

    • @exnbcnco
      @exnbcnco 4 роки тому +4

      @Jim Kalpa According to ancient text, those wooden torpedoes were a gift from the Gods, who are also known as the Little Green Men. In fact, after giving us humans that highly advanced technology, the Little Green Men almost yanked it back in fear of destroying mankinds natural progression cycle. I'm glad I read books!

    • @neilgriffiths6427
      @neilgriffiths6427 3 роки тому +5

      Drugs are bad - unless prescribed.

    • @edfleming9600
      @edfleming9600 2 роки тому +2

      It was only 2.3 feet. You're lucky you lived this long.

    • @carloko08
      @carloko08 2 роки тому +1

      Damn, friend, how old you are and how well you have learned the new information technologies, look, you even have a UA-cam channel! surely you also have social networks, and you are over 120 years old! I hope you do well with the girls too hahaha

  • @78Rey
    @78Rey 2 роки тому +29

    Russia's deepest submarine is the A-12, which could dive to a depth of 6,000m (about 18,000 feet)

    • @Scramasax
      @Scramasax 2 роки тому +9

      Russias deepest diving submarines are the Mir-1 and Mir-2. Test depth over 6,100m.
      These things were used for exploring the Titanic for example.

    • @aleksandrvix1890
      @aleksandrvix1890 2 роки тому +3

      @@Scramasax Ни надо путать батискаф с подводной лодкой
      !

    • @MrCannibal1985
      @MrCannibal1985 2 роки тому +1

      @@aleksandrvix1890 "АС-12, известная также как «Лошарик» - российская сверхсекретная глубоководная атомная подводная лодка, не несущая вооружения и способная погружаться, по некоторым данным, на глубину до 6000 метров" как бы понятно кто топ в этом топе=)))

    • @zendiime
      @zendiime Рік тому +2

      @@Scramasax maybe they can find the Titan Submersible

    • @stonehaven2289
      @stonehaven2289 Рік тому

      ​@@zendiimeit was already found.. imploded.. scattered among the debris of the Titanic..

  • @dannywainwrightq7828
    @dannywainwrightq7828 4 роки тому +63

    You showed an "astute" class british attack sub for a Chinese sub lol. %hit happens lol.

  • @9261-k6l
    @9261-k6l 4 роки тому +61

    Самая быстрая (К-222), самая глубоководная (К-278), самая крупная (проект 941 «Акула») и самая скрытная лодка (проект 945А «Кондор») были созданы именно в СССР.

    • @antibiotickprojeckt2660
      @antibiotickprojeckt2660 3 роки тому +10

      Сейчас в России актуальны яхты ! чем длиннее и больше ,тем лучше !

    • @rom4n520
      @rom4n520 3 роки тому +7

      @@antibiotickprojeckt2660 это уже не смешно, вы опоздали с этой шуткой на 15 лет, более того оно имеет глупую риторику. 1-Яхты тоже корабли и их строить нужно уметь.
      2 По вашим тезисам яхты должны покупаться за кордоном ибо мы их делать не должны уметь.

    • @chaosXP3RT
      @chaosXP3RT 3 роки тому

      Soviet propaganda. They always claim everything is better than the USA, which is how you know every word is a lie

    • @alexeysergeev2151
      @alexeysergeev2151 3 роки тому +7

      @@chaosXP3RT, you might realise that your statements sound either like a manipulation trick or a logical fallacy. You first make the wrong assumption/overgeneralisation ("They always claim everything is better than the USA..."), incorrectly attribute it to your opponent(s) and then refute it.
      To get a balanced opinion on the Soviet/Russian military, it is important to bear in mind that both sides are biased and one should look not only at Western sources of information but Russian ones as well (you need to know Russian to do that seriously).
      Each coin has two sides and if you see one side of the coin, this does not mean you know how the whole coin looks.

    • @78Rey
      @78Rey 2 роки тому +1

      @@alexeysergeev2151 Russian GRU-officers (joke) say that Russia's deepest submarine is the A-12, which could dive to a depth of 6,000m (about 18,000 feet)

  • @oceanic8424
    @oceanic8424 4 роки тому +14

    Maximum test, and crush depths are always classified. They may not even be revealed to the captains, or XOs as a matter of protocol. All classified operating documentation will probably only identify operating parameters that can be fully guaranteed by the builder.
    Given engineering safety factors, the ultimate limits may only be known by very few engineers, scientists, and senior naval staff.
    The most probable points of rupture would likely be at welded joints, hatch interfaces, and anywhere external objects need to penetrate the pressure hull; such as periscopes, and power transmission shafts.

    • @antioch4019
      @antioch4019 3 роки тому +4

      Well the Captain and XO must have a number to go on to not exceed that number. If that is the maximum crush/test depth or not or a decided max depth is irrelevant as that number is the maximum depth the sub can operate in anyway. So that number that the captain gets is the maximum depth of the sub even if the sub itself would be able to handle more.

    • @EricThompson1965
      @EricThompson1965 2 роки тому +1

      Right... And on my boat, we never told the Skipper where we kept the Trident C-4 missiles.... Protocol... Sheesh! I guarantee you that no US Navy Captain of a submarine has gone to sea ignorant of his boat's capabilities....

  • @WestValleyTransparency
    @WestValleyTransparency 2 роки тому +9

    Here's the thing. When it comes to attack and ballistic submarines, it's not about depth but stealth.

    • @Pythoner
      @Pythoner Рік тому +1

      it's related. There are different ocean currents at different depths, forming layers, and sound is not always conductive from one layer to another, so to speak, due to differences in temperatures between them.

  • @leneanderthalien
    @leneanderthalien 3 роки тому +73

    the real diving performances from the military submarines are never public known: this is a deep secret...

    • @kf5541
      @kf5541 3 роки тому +3

      How deep?

    • @Shotgun93Alexander
      @Shotgun93Alexander 3 роки тому +3

      Deep enough

    • @phil20_20
      @phil20_20 3 роки тому +2

      VERY deep...

    • @EricThompson1965
      @EricThompson1965 2 роки тому

      Nope... The Test and Crush depths of a Trident are only Confidential... The lowest of the 3 levels of Naval security classifications. Because those depths are not very difficult to discern if you have actually built your own submarines. Russia has built many subs. They are fully aware of the approximate realistic depths to which military submarines are capable... Because they have built their own... The ocean is the constant. Technology and metallurgy can only do so much against the pressure of the oceans. Regardless of nationality.... Take it from an old boomer squid. Those depths are NOT the hilarious 5000 or 10,000 meters these fools on here are claiming... So while the limits ARE classified, they are not highly classified

  • @MrEjidorie
    @MrEjidorie 4 роки тому +25

    You miss Japan`s "Soryu" class submarine in the top 10 list. Her operation depth is about 900 meters, and she should listed as No.1.

    • @АндрейОстроушко-й7ж
      @АндрейОстроушко-й7ж 4 роки тому +3

      No.1. в мире является советская атомная субмарина К-278 «Комсомолец», рабочая глубина 1000 м , максимальная 1250 м.

    • @bougaevaleksandr1450
      @bougaevaleksandr1450 4 роки тому +3

      The deepest submarine ever is "Komsomolets" - 1027 m (August 4, 1985). Sank in 1989 due to the fire accident onboard.

    • @kamkam_99
      @kamkam_99 4 роки тому +1

      @@АндрейОстроушко-й7ж​ @Bougaev Aleksandr
      「Operational Submarines in the World」

    • @ToreDL87
      @ToreDL87 3 роки тому

      @@bougaevaleksandr1450 That was an exception, not the rule.

    • @punpun1960
      @punpun1960 2 роки тому +1

      内緒なので言わないでいいです

  • @dannywainwrightq7828
    @dannywainwrightq7828 4 роки тому +44

    And all these subs can probably go deeper than what we civilians know about. Good video overall ! And very pleasant voice! Lol.

    • @thebuzz4108
      @thebuzz4108  4 роки тому +1

      Why... Thankyou

    • @hatman4818
      @hatman4818 4 роки тому +9

      Yes, crush depth.
      Test depth is the maximum safe tested depth. Exact crush depth is a bit of an unknown. It's predicted based on calculations, but it's impossible to prove without, ya know, CRUSHING IT. And at close to crush depth, even small condition changes could result in the sub sustaining damage or crushing.
      Crush depth is usually another 30-50% deeper than test depth. In war, a sub commander could decide to go deeper than test depth to get away from hostiles, at increased risk of damage or crush.

    • @skymarshallmarz5573
      @skymarshallmarz5573 4 роки тому +2

      Usually the max depth is around 500 to 1000 ft more.

    • @maxvonnitten4213
      @maxvonnitten4213 4 роки тому

      @@thebuzz4108 There is Test Depth which is the maximum depth at which the submarine is allowed to operate during peace time and is dictated by its structure.
      Then Crush Depth is the depth at which the submarine's hull will not be able to sustain the pressure and will crush.
      These figures are 2/3 of crush depth of US Submarines and 4/7 of crush depth for British Submarines.
      As an example, if the test depth of a Sub is 600 meters (~ 2000 ft), its crush depth is 900 meters (~ 3000 ft) if the Submarine is American.

    • @maxvonnitten4213
      @maxvonnitten4213 4 роки тому

      @@hatman4818 There is Test Depth which is the maximum depth at which the submarine is allowed to operate during peace time and is dictated by its structure.
      Then Crush Depth is the depth at which the submarine's hull will not be able to sustain the pressure and will crush.
      These figures are 2/3 of crush depth of US Submarines and 4/7 of crush depth for British Submarines.
      As an example, if the test depth of a Sub is 600 meters (~ 2000 ft), its crush depth is 900 meters (~ 3000 ft) if the Submarine is American.

  • @NamishIslands
    @NamishIslands 4 роки тому +21

    I've always thought that the deepest diving of all is the Yellow Submarine!!!

  • @pra1ma246
    @pra1ma246 3 роки тому +103

    russian subs be like,
    "comrade tovarisch , how deep do you want to go?"
    "Da"

    • @toha40
      @toha40 3 роки тому +1

      I see. Its is yes meme

    • @harley0704
      @harley0704 2 роки тому

      In russian the tovarisch means comrade ! 😉

  • @cyrilsingh3465
    @cyrilsingh3465 3 роки тому +1

    The data given is only an assumption, as the real parameters are classified. The loveliest thing about this video is the voice of the lady. I can go on listening to her for hours, even if she is taking nonsense. Her voice is very soothing.

  • @mitsubishix-2887
    @mitsubishix-2887 4 роки тому +40

    Every countrys: make new weapons
    China: *Ctrl + c + v*

  • @Wheelie.Bin.
    @Wheelie.Bin. 3 роки тому +7

    The picture shown at 5:17 is a British Astute class submarine, not the Chinese one you were talking about.

  • @pop5678eye
    @pop5678eye 3 роки тому +14

    'Test depth' has different meanings depending on the navy involved. Navies around the world define it anywhere between two-thirds to just one-half maximum design depth.

    • @neilgriffiths6427
      @neilgriffiths6427 3 роки тому

      But since actual max design depth is secret, so, really, is the test depth.

    • @NahuCommNS
      @NahuCommNS Рік тому +1

      @@neilgriffiths6427 Accurate details are. But you can get a fair estimation of the actual design depth of the submarine by looking at the pressure rating of the steel used in its construction, plus the official test depth ratings for each navy. HY-80 for example, used in most western subs during the cold war, has a rating of about 550mts (the USS Thresher, built on this steel, had a test depth of 400 mts; now if we take the US Navy's two thirds test depth rating, that would mean that the design depth of the then Thresher-Class, was 600 mts, and Thresher herself imploded at around 730 mts). Cheers.

  • @imtitanium6691
    @imtitanium6691 4 роки тому +40

    wtf? where is the USSR submarine K-278 "KOMSOMOLETS" ? the absolute record for diving depth among submarines - 1027 meters

    • @jerromedrakejr9332
      @jerromedrakejr9332 4 роки тому +2

      You will find answer in the title of the video...

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 4 роки тому +6

      wtf? You are wrong. Absolute record belongs to your country - USA submarine USS Scorpion (SSN-589). Her record is diving to depth 3000 meters near Azor Islands. So, it dove, crashed, and never surfaced, together with entire crew. But your anti-russian propaganda hides it from you.

    • @andrelabbe5315
      @andrelabbe5315 4 роки тому

      @@AlexanderTch he crash no deep

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 4 роки тому +2

      @@imtitanium6691 of course. USS Scorpion sank together with entire crew.

    • @AlexanderTch
      @AlexanderTch 4 роки тому +2

      @@andrelabbe5315 Who he? Scorpion? I repeat. USS Scorpion sank at depth 3000 meters and crashed.

  • @munindramohanta2584
    @munindramohanta2584 4 роки тому +125

    5 Russian subs in a list of 10!!

    • @juliap.5375
      @juliap.5375 4 роки тому +39

      And they forgot nuclear russian submarine of project 10831 which demonstrated depth of 3000 m (yes, three thousands), while by rumors (project is classified) it can reach up to 6000.

    • @cyrilchui2811
      @cyrilchui2811 4 роки тому +20

      Russian love Subs

    • @t74guard78
      @t74guard78 4 роки тому +14

      You do realize that this list is bullshit and not at all accurate? How deep a sub can dive is one of the most heavily guarded secrets of it. This kind of infomation is not made public in the US, Russia, England, France or any other nation. Whoever made this video has no idea what their talking about. Obviously if China has the second deepest diving sub in the world. They can't even build a decent jet engine for themselves and your going to tell me they can build a sub, which is a thousand times harder to do, that can dive deeper than just one sub on earth. Yeah ok if you believe that I got some great snow skiing property for sale in southern Florida.

    • @t74guard78
      @t74guard78 4 роки тому +2

      @@juliap.5375 hahahaha you too? Rumors and Russian rumors at that. Like I said to Munindra, if you believe that then I have some great snow skiing property in southern Florida for sale real cheap, interested? 3,000 no wait, 6,000 meters you say? hahahahah and you really believe that? Especially coming from Russia who is the best at blowing smoke up the worlds ass. You probably would believe the world is really flat and that the universe spins around the earth too. A sub that can dive 2 miles deep give me a break. You probably have no idea what kind of pressure there is at 2 miles down. At 6,000 meters the water pressure is around 8,760 psi. That is every square inch on that sub there is 8,760 pounds of pressure pushing in on it. hahahahah or a teenage to young adult bull African Elephant standing on it. If they could I mean. Sorry to burst your little bubble but those aren't rumors you heard but the usual Russian flat out lying. Hhahahah even the idiots who made up this fictional list knew better than to include some Russian fantasy so they didn't forget, They just didn't want their list to look any more stupid then it already did. It's bad enough as it is. hahaha I have to thank you for making me laugh though. Thank you. hahahah still laughing.

    • @Boomshakalaga
      @Boomshakalaga 4 роки тому +5

      t74 guard is pissed bc US is not on top of the List lol

  • @erickrcisneros
    @erickrcisneros 4 роки тому +18

    Being able to hold pressure and navigates with stability a half a kilometer in the ocean under the waves is pretty impressive

    • @carbon1255
      @carbon1255 3 роки тому +2

      The soviets had a sub with a crush depth of 1,500m it sunk from a fire, but still.

    • @santyclause8034
      @santyclause8034 3 роки тому

      I'm gonna guess packing a set of drumsticks in your kit and bringing them aboard one's sub is banned.

  • @АлексеевАндрей-е6й
    @АлексеевАндрей-е6й 4 роки тому +14

    You loose the K-278 "Komsomolets" sub, the only build up submarine of pr. 685 in the Soviet Navy, that hit 1027 meters undersea in 4 august 1985.

    • @JG-dx5wi
      @JG-dx5wi 3 роки тому +1

      The is no US torpedo that could reach this sub at depth. I'll take that over stealth any day.

    • @jespereriksson4651
      @jespereriksson4651 2 роки тому

      Komsomolets is not currently in service

    • @NahuCommNS
      @NahuCommNS Рік тому +1

      @@jespereriksson4651 No sh*t mate, it's at the bottom of the Norwegian sea.

  • @hasnain_.__xb159
    @hasnain_.__xb159 Рік тому +2

    As an Indian I am proud that we are not holding any records regarding any sea or ocean based

  • @roberttrahan709
    @roberttrahan709 4 роки тому +13

    During WWII, lip flapping was the reason the title "Silent Service" became necessary.

  • @RK-ow2dn
    @RK-ow2dn 4 роки тому +13

    hey man US never caught up with russia lot of mistake in depth measurement
    akula can reach 600m (full payload)
    yasen also tested for 600m (full payload)
    seawolf maximum test depth is 480m.(not payload mentioned)

    • @goodday381
      @goodday381 4 роки тому +2

      You know Russia steals

    • @vadrak6197
      @vadrak6197 4 роки тому +5

      @@goodday381
      You know USA steals.

    • @t74guard78
      @t74guard78 4 роки тому +2

      @@vadrak6197 yeah we stole info on the F-22 from............ ok we stole info on the F-35 from........ Ok we stole info on the quitest nuclear sub in the world from............... Wait, how can we steal from others when they don't have what we do? I mean you can't have the best by stealing because no one else has what you do. Well VaDrak looks like you are blowing smoke up everyone's ass. Think maybe your Russian. Before anybody says anything I know Sweden has probably the quitest sub in the world but it isn't nuclear. My point is when you have things like Stealth technology and have had it for 20+ years, and no one else still has it, how in the hell could the info have been stolen? Make absolutly no sense at all. That is just one of many examples of what I am talking about. Blow your smoke elsewhere VaDrak, nobody here is buying it.

    • @t74guard78
      @t74guard78 4 роки тому +1

      Well like many here have been saying, information about how deep a sub can dive is highly classified information and nobody except those that are suppose to know, knows it. You have no idea the depth the Akula or Yasen or Seawolf can dive. Whatever source you got that from has no idea either. Most likely just guesses at what it might be. The US doesn't need to catch up with Russia in how deep a sub can go. The US has a huge advantage when it comes to how quiet a sub is and there is no better issue when it comes to subs than how quiet it is. To this day a Ohio class ballistic submarine has never been successfully tracked by a Russian or any other country sub. And the Ohip class subs have been around for several decades. When it comes to the Seawolfs and Virginia class subs, forget it they don't stand a chance in finding one of them outside of being extremely lucky. On the other hand Los Angeles class subs track and even follow Russian subs all over the place. Most of the time unnoticed. So if the US is a little behind, which I doubt, in how deep their subs can dive compared to the Russian subs I say who cares. No where near as important as being more quiet.

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 4 роки тому

      @@t74guard78 Yea you leave out the names of the operations where the US stole the technology, lol!
      Project Azorian? US has stolen entire Russian submarines so they could reverse engineer and copy Russian technology?
      Project Diamond? Project Have Doughnut? So we know for a fact the US stole every MIG ever built. And used Russian science and math to develop low radar cross sections for aircraft? Is that not what Lockheed tells us how they did it?
      I agree makes no sense at all to leave the proof and facts throughout history out. Cos you would have to pretend you didn't steal the technology when all the US military looks like a copy of other countries stuff? lmao!

  • @tritonx5433
    @tritonx5433 4 роки тому +10

    Will you ever do a face reveal? We want to see who makes all these great videos.

    • @dannywainwrightq7828
      @dannywainwrightq7828 4 роки тому

      Possibly Melissa Hurt. Maybe , I really don't know.

    • @knowledge8676
      @knowledge8676 4 роки тому

      @TRITONX what is your nationality ?

    • @tritonx5433
      @tritonx5433 4 роки тому +1

      @@knowledge8676 indian bro

    • @tritonx5433
      @tritonx5433 4 роки тому

      @@dannywainwrightq7828 How is she melissa hurt? The buzz said she lives in shillong.

    • @knowledge8676
      @knowledge8676 4 роки тому

      @@tritonx5433 oo. I am Indian too.
      আমিও ভারতীয়। From Santiniketan, West Bengal.
      শান্তিনিকেতন, পশ্চিমবঙ্গ।

  • @sergeireischel1610
    @sergeireischel1610 3 роки тому +8

    Russian K-278 Komsomolets (Project 685 "Plavnik" or Mike class) - nuclear-powered attack submarine wich had reached a depth of 1,027 meters back in 1984.
    That's a first place actually.

    • @78Rey
      @78Rey 2 роки тому

      Russia's deepest submarine is the A-12, which could dive to a depth of 6,000m (about 18,000 feet)

  • @stjepanistra5238
    @stjepanistra5238 2 роки тому

    again, so nice voice. kiss from croatia, mddle europe 😍👠💋💔❤‍🔥

  • @sweatybotfn9982
    @sweatybotfn9982 Рік тому +1

    The type 096 broke the new record with testing depth and entering service in the near future

  • @vanderwallstronghold8905
    @vanderwallstronghold8905 3 роки тому +17

    The subs that my country have can dive into the center of the inner core of the Sun.

    • @APersonOnYouTubeX
      @APersonOnYouTubeX 3 роки тому

      Yes I imagine the bottom is better coz they never come back up

    • @philnightjar1971
      @philnightjar1971 3 роки тому +2

      @Logan Hughes Sucks to not be able to identify a joke,

  • @gravelking2.071
    @gravelking2.071 4 роки тому +47

    Oscar-class: I'm the deepest-diving sub in the world!
    K-278 "Komsomolets": *weakling*

    • @billgere5293
      @billgere5293 4 роки тому +2

      The Oscar and Sierra class subs when the USSR designed and built them in the Cold War they knew that they only way to survive was: speed and depth. They were so noisy you could hear them at miles away even if they were running silent and our boats were at flank lol. They didn’t improve much in class 2 either. Unfortunately they found out the hard way the 688I were just as fast and could dive almost as deep but much quieter. Many minor collisions occurred because of close encounters with the Russian boats and boomers by accident. Simply because the Russian Captains didn’t know the American boats were there. Unfortunate risks but things that never made the news and truth is none of those skippers wanted to start WW3 it was more about the job and egos lol.

    • @kevinvojta692
      @kevinvojta692 4 роки тому

      @@billgere5293 Funny i seem to remember Alfa's diving too 4,000 Feet in the early 80's. And Honeywell made mark 50. Only had a Max depth of 1,900 feet. So the 688 could do nothing.

    • @MidwestDIY
      @MidwestDIY 4 роки тому

      Russian "weakling" submarines Kursk (Oscar class) and K-278 (only 1 made ever) both sunk and killed their crews
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_submarine_K-278_Komsomolets
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_submarine_Kursk_(K-141)

    • @JG-dx5wi
      @JG-dx5wi 3 роки тому

      @@billgere5293 The 688 had terrible depth capability compared to Soviet subs. Its one of the few US subs along with the Virginia that couldn't dive as deep as the previous class. Test depth of 950 ft. Blame it on Rickover. He could've had a sub with a 2000 ft test depth had he gone with CONFORM.

    • @billgere5293
      @billgere5293 3 роки тому

      @@JG-dx5wi oh I agree but they still could achieve 400m. The Russian subs on average can test over 800m. The information that is given here for the Akula’s test is in correct.

  • @stevenweaver3386
    @stevenweaver3386 4 роки тому +10

    Test depths are what engineers say is safe. They're very conservative about it, the boats can likely exceed that by 25%.

    • @kmlammto
      @kmlammto 3 роки тому

      A former submariner told me about a boat that exceeded its listed depth by several fathoms. It returned to port several feet longer than it was before the trip. The proof of this was that it could no longer fit into its dock space/pen.

    • @khxbunkhxp8010
      @khxbunkhxp8010 3 роки тому

      Well KRI Nanggala 402 of Type 209 sure as heck can’t withstand 800m of pressure

    • @stevenweaver3386
      @stevenweaver3386 3 роки тому

      @@khxbunkhxp8010 yeah, specs give a test depth of 500m.

  • @nyanates
    @nyanates 4 роки тому +10

    It amazes me how a naval vessel as large as this can ever be considered “silent”.

    • @billydonaldson6483
      @billydonaldson6483 4 роки тому +2

      Once on station they move fairly slowly. Cavitation on the propeller would give away their position so the propeller turns very slowly. Most nuclear subs operate below the thermocline which varies depending on the location in the oceans.

    • @carbon1255
      @carbon1255 3 роки тому +1

      The Chinese one I absolutely don't believe. They are a good two decades behind in noise abatement. Electric subs are very quiet ambush predators, they turn their diesel engines off. The nuclear subs are pretty damn quiet going 30+ knots if they are deep enough to avoid cavitation - but they will never be as quiet as a diesel electric.

    • @carbon1255
      @carbon1255 3 роки тому +1

      @@billydonaldson6483 Only near the surface, and it depends how you define "most nuclear subs" as it has more to do with role than powerplant.

  • @al-azimahmed1188
    @al-azimahmed1188 3 роки тому

    I love these videos, well done guts. Good info

  • @omkr0122
    @omkr0122 4 роки тому +23

    'Engage the Catterpillar drive!" - Captain Raimius

    • @Mister_Pedantic
      @Mister_Pedantic 4 роки тому +1

      That would be "caterpillar" and "Ramius" for those who are keeping score.

    • @TheSchmed
      @TheSchmed 4 роки тому

      “We shail into histry”

    • @georget5874
      @georget5874 4 роки тому

      then start to sing...........

  • @michaelnaisbitt1639
    @michaelnaisbitt1639 4 роки тому +13

    You missed out the Australian Oxley class submariner. With a depth capacity of almost 100 metres. And can be heard for over 200 km away. 🙃🙃

    • @earlofeastwood777
      @earlofeastwood777 4 роки тому +2

      Ha ha ha ausie wit brill

    • @earlofeastwood777
      @earlofeastwood777 4 роки тому

      Ha ha ha ausie witt, brill.

    • @younissumaling8744
      @younissumaling8744 4 роки тому

      unfortunately they cant add submarines meant to kill civilians maybe when they develop a better crew training they can add it

    • @nwl213
      @nwl213 4 роки тому +1

      Do they serve kangaroos on board? 🙃

    • @TSUTENKAKU007
      @TSUTENKAKU007 4 роки тому

      Sounds like a suicide submarine.

  • @gribay01
    @gribay01 4 роки тому +8

    the submarine K-278 Komsomolets, the Soviet Union 1027 meters

    • @Swyatogor.7526
      @Swyatogor.7526 3 роки тому

      USS Thresher (SSN-593)-2,600 metres (8,400 ft)

    • @mattberk3081
      @mattberk3081 3 роки тому

      @@Swyatogor.7526 K-219 6,000 meters (18,000 feet)

    • @gribay01
      @gribay01 3 роки тому

      @@Swyatogor.7526 она затонула на этой глубине, а предельная глубина погружения у Трэшэра 360 метров. Комсомолец же действительно ходил на километровой глубине.

  • @Cudi8118
    @Cudi8118 3 роки тому +6

    RIP to the Crew of the Indonesian Submarine! They could of survivedif they have the Oscar class submarine! ☹️ so sad, because they died in 2700feet of water and the Oscar class is rated to go down to 2,700 feet!

  • @sldessel
    @sldessel 4 роки тому +8

    You know they are all capable of going all the way to the bottom at any time.

  • @cmdrhudson
    @cmdrhudson 4 роки тому +35

    They forgot the russian Alfa-Class with estimated dive depth of 900m, and 41 knots speed.
    Unreachable for western Torpedoes!
    "c'mon, shoot me if you can!"

    • @barracuda7018
      @barracuda7018 4 роки тому +13

      Yes everything about Russian hardware is estimated and speculative. 41 knots submerged speed is a joke .Alpha class are no longer in operation.

    • @Юрий-м2ц
      @Юрий-м2ц 4 роки тому +2

      @@barracuda7018 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfa-class_submarine

    • @texasforever7887
      @texasforever7887 4 роки тому +4

      The last Alfa was decommissioned and scraped in 1996 so they are no longer operational.

    • @melee-dexterdexterious2878
      @melee-dexterdexterious2878 4 роки тому +7

      That was true, at the times when first alfa class went operational, most torpedoes top speed usually stays at 35 knots max, but shortly after the alfa class specs fully collected, also on one occasion, alfas were caught speeding at 40s knots, most NATO nations started to fielding 50s knot torpedoes, UK spearfish with 70 knots as well as mk 48 adcap at 65 knots as two examples.. With 600 meters of maximum target depth to boot.. If those coldwar specs/stories are to be used as a reference in the least..

    • @carbon1255
      @carbon1255 3 роки тому +7

      @@barracuda7018 41 knots is indeed a joke, it was 43.7 knots at 97% output- they stopped there because everything started shaking rather unpleasantly. It was a twin reactor design fully titanium to make it as light as possible, its as close as you get to a truly racing submarine.
      Nothing about it is estimated or speculative, they are painstakingly monitored and tracked. Alfa was very easy to track because it wasn't exactly a quiet submarine, but it was too fast to do anything about at the time.
      They even considered liquid metal reactors to go even faster, but they went for the tried and true. It was disgustingly expensive.
      Go speak to some submariners who were involved in recording data on her.

  • @sine-nomine
    @sine-nomine 3 роки тому +17

    The most insane thing in this video, is the dude kayaking in 1 meter waves..

    • @robertallen6710
      @robertallen6710 3 роки тому

      ..or trying to understand the girl's accent..

    • @DestinationBarbarism
      @DestinationBarbarism 9 місяців тому

      Just spent 20 seconds scrubbing my screen due to your avatar. So I will forever downvote any post I see from you :p

  • @siberiandweller7623
    @siberiandweller7623 4 роки тому +7

    Any submarine can reach any depth. But only one time.

  • @ЭрикРостовский-р9ч
    @ЭрикРостовский-р9ч 4 роки тому +1

    Никогда не злите Русского Медведя!!!😎 ☝️

  • @physicals
    @physicals 2 роки тому +1

    That paddle boarder is misleading, they must be a giant 😂

  • @philv3941
    @philv3941 3 роки тому +10

    French army is clear : real dive capacity are never communicated. When you heard our officers they allways say the average known depth of all the concurrence and the typical ( and official) phrase is " we dive at least to 400" ( probably much more)
    So this kind of vid is totally irrelevant.

    • @michelguenin
      @michelguenin 3 роки тому +2

      Cette une vidéo complètement inutile parce que la profondeur est une donnée classifié.

    • @tutur.mp4110
      @tutur.mp4110 3 роки тому

      @@michelguenin Nan mais tkt, la prochaine vidéo, c'est les signatures acoustique des SNLE du monde

  • @sankaracchumobile5320
    @sankaracchumobile5320 4 роки тому +7

    Who has best submarines us or Russia ?

    • @theidiotskiller6589
      @theidiotskiller6589 4 роки тому +2

      The Virginia block 4 is the best submarine right now but Russia and us build a fifth gen of subs like Columbia and borei but us say that Columbia it will be the best subs ever

    • @sankaracchumobile5320
      @sankaracchumobile5320 4 роки тому +1

      Krasnodar and Belgorod what about those ?

    • @igorvyacheslavtherussianmu3142
      @igorvyacheslavtherussianmu3142 4 роки тому +2

      UK RUSSIA

    • @singularity-6339
      @singularity-6339 4 роки тому +1

      German

    • @wolfgangselle4307
      @wolfgangselle4307 4 роки тому +1

      Singularity - maybe on the non nuclear ones? I don’t know who else builds submarines with a H2 fuel cell

  • @rakeshmeitei1680
    @rakeshmeitei1680 3 роки тому +15

    When I was a child I thought submarine dives near the sea floor 😭🤣

    • @blazingblade7061
      @blazingblade7061 3 роки тому +3

      What's funny it's normal to think all sort of things when you are little

    • @imtheoriginalvisual
      @imtheoriginalvisual 3 роки тому +1

      Yes

    • @RichieWellock
      @RichieWellock 3 роки тому

      you were right as well, they do. but they just dont come up if they have passed there depth. lol

    • @Garchist
      @Garchist 3 роки тому +1

      It does. As long as the sea floor isn't too far away.

    • @RichieWellock
      @RichieWellock 3 роки тому

      @@Garchist let him keep that child hood dream ' Yeh submarines can sit on the deepest ocean floor' (may not return to surface)

  • @zephyrkhambatta
    @zephyrkhambatta 3 роки тому

    truly informational! Thanks!

  • @YAMAHAF9.9JMH
    @YAMAHAF9.9JMH 4 роки тому +8

    Служил срочную службу КТОФ 1981- 1984 Б- 641 , Р- 29- 21

    • @nikgrey7334
      @nikgrey7334 3 роки тому

      Вас можно поздравить за службу в ПК53

  • @Antisophiste
    @Antisophiste 3 роки тому +6

    a nation will never give the maximum depth of their submarines this is a very well kept military secret

  • @wgwg8536
    @wgwg8536 4 роки тому +3

    I’ve got a friend who works in the submarines for the Royal Navy even he doesn’t know how deep the submarines go it’s top-secret need to know

    • @EricThompson1965
      @EricThompson1965 4 роки тому +1

      Maybe they keep that from you Brits, but on American boats it is merely Confidential. Hell. The Test and Crush Depth was a question at my qual board.

    • @tancreddehauteville764
      @tancreddehauteville764 3 роки тому

      I think the Russians already assume that they go to the Marianas Trench depth, so it's pretty irrelevant.

  • @mesut2030
    @mesut2030 3 роки тому +7

    Nanggala 402 crushed at 600m . RIP

    • @alfiansori4003
      @alfiansori4003 3 роки тому +1

      +800m

    • @mesut2030
      @mesut2030 3 роки тому

      @@alfiansori4003 they was found at 800m+ , crushed at 600m

  • @manivannakaruna6830
    @manivannakaruna6830 3 роки тому

    Indian indigenous submarine on the way🔥🔥🔥🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

  • @marcussv661
    @marcussv661 4 роки тому

    Many Thanks

  • @genneltorres4500
    @genneltorres4500 4 роки тому +4

    SO CUTE your VOICE The Buzz

  • @want2seeall
    @want2seeall 3 роки тому +4

    Think of this as the tip of the iceberg.
    The diesel subs are very impressive.

  • @marshinator7806
    @marshinator7806 4 роки тому +13

    You should have glued photos of each submarine on a wall and threw darts at them it would have been more accurate then the information in this vid

  • @hernanariel3464
    @hernanariel3464 4 роки тому

    Thank you for the info & video!!

  • @Gixxer150love
    @Gixxer150love 3 роки тому +2

    日本の潜水艦が世界で一番深く潜航でき、魚雷においても世界で一番深い場所から発射できます

    • @glu583
      @glu583 Рік тому +1

      魚雷が1000mの深さでも使えるらしいからね。一般の魚雷は数百メートルで使えなくなるって誰かが言ってた。

  • @tutytuty659
    @tutytuty659 4 роки тому +7

    This person really like submarine👍

  • @jackburnell3209
    @jackburnell3209 3 роки тому +19

    The depth and speed capabilities of US military submarines are classified. The Seawolf goes far deeper than posted capabilities.

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 3 роки тому +3

      And we believe you, right?

    • @jackburnell3209
      @jackburnell3209 3 роки тому +4

      @@thethirdman225 I really don't give a shit what you believe. That's your issue, not mine.

    • @thomasdevalois4413
      @thomasdevalois4413 3 роки тому +1

      So does any submarine

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 3 роки тому +1

      @@thomasdevalois4413 Yeah, he's just another poster with a woody for the Sea Wolf.

    • @vermas4654
      @vermas4654 3 роки тому +1

      Same about the russian submarines... It equals out

  • @ildarius116
    @ildarius116 3 роки тому +3

    Sierra-I - class - 550m
    Sierra-II, Akula, Oscar - class - 600m
    Mike - class - 1027m - Record

    • @r.weller3990
      @r.weller3990 3 роки тому

      @Serge SG hello serge wherefrom you have this dates?

  • @sherlock1895
    @sherlock1895 4 місяці тому +1

    I’m a bit claustrophobic so I would have to have a room with a window I could open ANYTIME I wanted. Cheers!

  • @manishdhakad4649
    @manishdhakad4649 4 роки тому +4

    I love your voice 😍😍

  • @JustinGrant-b7v
    @JustinGrant-b7v Рік тому +3

    The titan topped all of these

    • @surf2257
      @surf2257 Рік тому

      Submesible are not submarines. Titan was a submersible made like a submarine with carbon fiber. What can go wrong.

    • @batman_2004
      @batman_2004 Рік тому

      @@surf2257 /r/whoosh

  • @MRDON
    @MRDON 4 роки тому +22

    "Soryu Class" are over 900m.

    • @Scorpio13
      @Scorpio13 4 роки тому

      Nope, they can't.500m tops.

    • @yukiyuki8941
      @yukiyuki8941 4 роки тому +2

      Their main armament Type 89 heavyweight torpedo can be operated in a depth of 2953 feet.

    • @ackunkun
      @ackunkun 4 роки тому +3

      それは防秘です。消されるゾ。(^o^;)

    • @carbon1255
      @carbon1255 3 роки тому

      Only the torpedoes.

    • @jagdpanther2224
      @jagdpanther2224 3 роки тому

      Myth!

  • @АлександровичКубРусс

    The Soviet nuclear submarine K-278 "Komsomolets" belongs to the submarines of the 3rd generation, it is the only submarine of the project 685 "Fin". On August 4, 1985, she set an absolute record for diving depth among submarines - 1027 meters.

    • @azumishimizu1880
      @azumishimizu1880 Рік тому

      Before the Ukraine they could take on NATO/China/India/ Elon musk all at the same time. I DONT BELIEVE ANYTHING abt Russia

  • @wieari
    @wieari 3 роки тому +11

    Can that oscar class help in finding the missing indonesian submarine? :(

    • @ferenciaanna2614
      @ferenciaanna2614 3 роки тому +1

      No, cause its a maximum depth and indonesian submarine its been founded! But sadly, we cant bring it up and ofc 53 person died

    • @dannymccoy1783
      @dannymccoy1783 3 роки тому

      Plus it broke into 3 pieces.

    • @wieari
      @wieari 3 роки тому

      @@ferenciaanna2614 yes it has been founded thanks to our fellow country that work together with us in finding KRI Nanggala 402.

    • @wieari
      @wieari 3 роки тому +1

      @@dannymccoy1783 sadly yes. They all are on eternal patrol now ❤

  • @komandanwl1457
    @komandanwl1457 3 роки тому +2

    How about Mike class ? Test depth 1250 meters ;)

    • @komandanwl1457
      @komandanwl1457 3 роки тому

      @Serge SG agree😂. They miss this sub

  • @ke9967
    @ke9967 Рік тому +3

    I am here for some reason too.

  • @informationinflux4458
    @informationinflux4458 4 роки тому +43

    The Russians yet again! They love it down there skulking at the bottom of the ocean 🤣 All jokes aside they are incredible machines being able to withstand the immense pressures down there!

    • @Brewney
      @Brewney 4 роки тому +7

      K-278 Komsomolets. Only one has been built. 1250m.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_submarine_K-278_Komsomolets

    • @burnerjack01
      @burnerjack01 4 роки тому +1

      @@Brewney 1 built...1 sank. No longer able to be counted.

    • @dataman6744
      @dataman6744 4 роки тому +15

      @@burnerjack01 records don't go away just because its no longer in service. Otherwise we would strip all athletes of their medals when they die, no? there is no such thing as "world record holder weightlifter or 100m sprint 'still alive'" no, it just world record holder, period.

    • @SaltiDawg2008
      @SaltiDawg2008 4 роки тому +1

      @@dataman6744 So, who is the 9th rated 100m Sprint record holder from 1957?

    • @vukpsodorov5446
      @vukpsodorov5446 4 роки тому

      @@dataman6744 true, but the video was about subs that were in active service at the time of making it. so technically, the K-278 doesn't count because it wasn't in active service.

  • @ph11p3540
    @ph11p3540 4 роки тому +4

    These are official published depths. Most of these subs can safely dive deeper but the max safe depth is top secret info.

    • @carbon1255
      @carbon1255 3 роки тому +1

      Test depth is max operational depth in peacetime, which is fine. They aren't difficult to verify.

  • @euankellock8469
    @euankellock8469 3 роки тому +3

    5:20 - that's an Astute class.

    • @RichieWellock
      @RichieWellock 3 роки тому

      yes it is a Astute , but if they were going on facts, then the vanguard class cannot do that depth after its PWR replacement (no wear near that depth )

  • @boomerrob9223
    @boomerrob9223 4 роки тому +1

    I suspect these depths are wildly optimistic. Maybe if the figures were in feet...?

    • @Roarmeister2
      @Roarmeister2 4 роки тому

      If anything, the figures are conservative.

  • @からすカラス-v4f
    @からすカラス-v4f 2 роки тому +2

    潜水艦の最大深度って秘密の筈だけどね~🙄🥴

    • @glu583
      @glu583 Рік тому

      200mで浸水する中国の潜水艦が550っも潜れる訳ないでしょw

  • @protorhinocerator142
    @protorhinocerator142 3 роки тому +5

    0:17 Does anyone else get the creepy feeling that that sub with all the barnacles is a tomb that they found at the bottom of the sea?
    I wouldn't want to get inside that.

  • @BoBaH_BoBaHoB
    @BoBaH_BoBaHoB 4 роки тому +8

    Soviet "Mike" class -- test depth 1250 m.

    • @WadcaWymiaru
      @WadcaWymiaru 4 роки тому

      French *Trieste* reached 11,521 m but this was later corrected to 10,916 m.
      In *1960!!!*

    • @peterdurum434
      @peterdurum434 4 роки тому +2

      @@WadcaWymiaru we are talking about military subs not Bathyscaphes

    • @carbon1255
      @carbon1255 3 роки тому

      designed for TD of 1,250, but only tested 1,000m. This is only operational subs.

    • @carbon1255
      @carbon1255 3 роки тому

      @@WadcaWymiaru Swiss design, Italian built, Italian named, sold to the US. What do you mean FRENCH Trieste?

  • @ФранкМатроскин
    @ФранкМатроскин 4 роки тому +9

    Best Russian subs are actually 4 Boreis, 4 more are being built. These are even more powerful than Oscar class.

  • @afifikhlaskhan7572
    @afifikhlaskhan7572 3 роки тому

    Please make a video about 10 most powerful Mine Resistance & Ambush Protected Vehicles

  • @STRANGExDAYSx
    @STRANGExDAYSx 3 роки тому +1

    Submarines are a pretty crazy concept if you think about it 🤯

  • @Milo30066
    @Milo30066 3 роки тому +6

    No nation will say their dept, it's top secret. Seawolf has dept of more than 6000 feet!

  • @otyliciu
    @otyliciu 4 роки тому +5

    Pretty sure the old Soviet Alfa could out-dive them all: comparatively tiny vessel, all titanium double hull, very pressure resistant (and able to make 42 knots submerged).

    • @mirandela777
      @mirandela777 3 роки тому +3

      yup, the dive records and speed records that wonder fish made are still valid to this day. A true wonder work that boat... they used to dance circles around US subs and carriers, lol.

    • @EricThompson1965
      @EricThompson1965 3 роки тому +3

      @@mirandela777 No they didn't. True, Soviet subs could dive deeper and run faster than their US counterparts. But they were tin cans. Noisy as hell. I once tracked an Akula from over 100,000 yards away. They became more stealthy when Toshiba sold the Soviets hi-tech metallurgy secrets for their screws, but even still they made so much noise that there was never a time in which US Sosus stations weren't aware of their location

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 2 роки тому

      @@EricThompson1965 Maybe so but there were a few US commanders who wouldn't have minded having a few. And I don't think anyone disagreed about the noise they made. The original post was about how deep they allegedly went.

    • @EricThompson1965
      @EricThompson1965 2 роки тому

      @@thethirdman225 The original post is the biggest crock of shit I have seen on UA-cam

    • @thethirdman225
      @thethirdman225 2 роки тому

      @@EricThompson1965 If you don't understand the OP then tell someone who cares. I don't.

  • @loosecannon8340
    @loosecannon8340 4 роки тому +6

    And this entire list is probably mostly wrong, for the simple fact, that any information on what depths these submarines can go, be it test, operational, or maximum depths, it's all classified, the public at large will never know.
    I'm willing to bet that even many of the crew on those subs don't know how deep their subs can dive, with information known only to a select few of the crew and officers.

    • @t74guard78
      @t74guard78 4 роки тому +1

      LooseCannon did say some of the crew know and just because one might know how deep they are, it doesn't mean he or she knows how deep it can go. I agree with LooseCannon because this is a very closely guarded secret. A few on the sub may know but not many. Whoever made this list has no idea which subs dive deeper. Can't you tell by it's choice for second. A Chinese non nuclear sub. Please give me a break.

    • @MrFlatage
      @MrFlatage 4 роки тому

      @Matthew Huszarik An LA class has a crew of around 120+. So they put in 100s of depth gages? Or do they all huddle around the one depth gage in the really big room subs always have? lol!
      Nah you dare one of those crew to take a picture and tweet it? Then you know for a fact.
      Then tell Kristian Saucier onboard the USS Alexandria to go inside the nuclear reactor room and make pics all around.
      When the FBI and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service show up at his door? Don't respond to his emails and just ghost his ass. Else you end up in jail too? ;-)

  • @watz6962
    @watz6962 3 роки тому +1

    German type 212 Fuel Cell operatet submarine was forgotten ??? its quite new and dives deeper

  • @djbeacon1942
    @djbeacon1942 2 роки тому

    What about the SeaView? I thought Admiral Nelson designed it to go down to 2,000meters?