After Obtaining An Acquittal For Travis Rudolph, Marc Shiner Does Killer Cross

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
  • Marc Shiner is our guest for this week's Killer Cross Examination Podcast episode. I go behind the scenes of the Travis Rudolph murder case, the former Florida State University Football star who shiner defended in a Florida courtroom. Marc Shiner obtained an acquittal on all counts for Travis Rudolph. The case was highly publicized and not without fireworks: Shiner went after lead detective Emily Vander-Laan over her investigation. Shiner’s style of cross examination and in particular his cross examination of Vander-Laan is unconventional but incredibly effective. Shiner engages in a physical style of cross examination that really challenges the witness and was so effective in this case that not only did the jury disbelieve Vander-Laan but many observers (who watched his challenge of her) wanted other cases of hers reopened and re-examined.
    *************************************
    About Neil Rockind - Neil Rockind is a trial lawyer. Neil Rockind is often considered a bet the farm/company type of lawyer, taking on cases where the stakes are “all in.” Neil Rockind appears regularly on television and in the news, defends people in serious court cases, is a regular guest on the Law and Crime Network and also discusses popular trials and cases and current events with other top lawyers around the country. Neil Rockind has won just about every award imaginable, has represented athletes, celebrities, musicians, posters and has obtained acquittals in all varieties of cases. His nickname is "The Rockweiler" and he's known for his cross examination style.
    Neil Rockind:
    / neilrockindlaw
    / rockindlaw
    www.rockindlaw...
    www.killercross...
    *************************************
    Subscribe to Killer Cross Examination® Podcast
    APPLE: podcasts.apple....
    SPOTIFY: open.spotify.c....
    GOOGLE PODCASTS: podcasts.googl....
    AUDIBLE:
    www.audible.co....
    ******************************************
    Fair Use Doctrine
    The contents are under fair use. It may contain copyrighted materials whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This, in our view, is fair use pursuant to section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Fair use allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as for commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching or scholarship. We retain no rights to that material. To the extent the videos capture images or likenesses, we do not own the rights to those images, likenesses, etc and only use them pursuant to the fair use doctrine.
    All other rights are reserved.
    #travisrudolph #truecrime #crossexamination #marcshiner

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @gardenview75mj7
    @gardenview75mj7 Рік тому +4

    He played chess while the prosecution played checkers.

  • @Johnny-ng6xz
    @Johnny-ng6xz Рік тому +4

    saved that NFL player from the corrupt Palm Beach

  • @tone2littytone2litty6
    @tone2littytone2litty6 Рік тому +2

    the lead detective: on the case should be fired for her lack of investigation and hiding evidence that’s just my opinion

  • @GaryDeee
    @GaryDeee Рік тому +1

    Marc Shiner was an absolute boss and was incredible during the Rudolph case

  • @Johnny-ng6xz
    @Johnny-ng6xz Рік тому +1

    OKAY ROCK...NEXT WE NEED TO HAVE ALINA HABBA ON THE SHOW. .NOT ONLY IS SHE HOTT BUT A POWERHOUSE ATTORNEY

  • @Johnny-ng6xz
    @Johnny-ng6xz Рік тому +2

    Great ATTORNEY

  • @Johnny-ng6xz
    @Johnny-ng6xz Рік тому

    🎉Hell Yeah

  • @yay-3012
    @yay-3012 Рік тому +1

    I wondered why Mark sounds like my Dad then I found out he grew up in Brooklyn. God Bless Mr Shiner for saving Travis life.

  • @Mikados_Advark12
    @Mikados_Advark12 Рік тому +2

    I find it incredible that the lawyer does not have structure to his cross examination.
    Personally, when I cross examine I have themes which I will develop and will listen carefully to the answers I get. But I do have a structural approach because it provides a platform for the jury; otherwise it becomes a mess of words.

    • @NeilRockind
      @NeilRockind  Рік тому +1

      I get that … but his cross examination worked on that case.

    • @Mikados_Advark12
      @Mikados_Advark12 Рік тому

      @@NeilRockind It did - and I loved his energy and passion. But, imagine a cross on a complex fraud- now that would need a structural approach.
      Love your channel by the way - and your topics and insights are well worth listening to.