Alex Jones Lawyer Norm Pattis Discusses Sandy Hook Billion Dollar Lawsuit

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
  • Norm Pattis is one of the most well known and recognized trial lawyers in Connecticut. Pattis is no stranger to controversy, having participated in the defense of at least one J6 defendant so it came as no surprise that he got involved in the defense of online provocateur and extremist Alex Jones in the Sandy Hook Defamation Trial in Connecticut. Jones was found liable and ordered to pay hundreds of millions of dollars. Norm Pattis sparred with the Koskoff lawyers, Chris Mattie, the judge, a courtroom of victims and survivors and intense media coverage - not to mention having to manage Alex Jones as a client. Norm Pattis joins me on the podcast to dissect the trial, the verdict, the judge, his strategy, the plaintiff’s lawyer and the media on the Killer Cross Examination® Podcast.
    *************************************
    About Neil Rockind - Neil Rockind is a trial lawyer. Neil Rockind is often considered a bet the farm/company type of lawyer, taking on cases where the stakes are “all in.” Neil Rockind appears regularly on television and in the news, defends people in serious court cases, is a regular guest on the Law and Crime Network and also discusses popular trials and cases and current events with other top lawyers around the country. Neil Rockind has won just about every award imaginable, has represented athletes, celebrities, musicians, posters and has obtained acquittals in all varieties of cases. His nickname is "The Rockweiler" and he's known for his cross examination style.
    Neil Rockind:
    / neilrockindlaw
    / rockindlaw
    www.rockindlaw...
    www.killercross...
    *************************************
    Subscribe to Killer Cross Examination® Podcast
    APPLE: podcasts.apple....
    SPOTIFY: open.spotify.c....
    GOOGLE PODCASTS: podcasts.googl....
    AUDIBLE:
    www.audible.co....
    ******************************************
    Fair Use Doctrine
    The contents are under fair use. It may contain copyrighted materials whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This, in our view, is fair use pursuant to section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Fair use allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as for commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching or scholarship. We retain no rights to that material. To the extent the videos capture images or likenesses, we do not own the rights to those images, likenesses, etc and only use them pursuant to the fair use doctrine.
    All other rights are reserved.
    #crossexamination #sandyhook #alexjones

КОМЕНТАРІ • 13

  • @jarrodanderson2124
    @jarrodanderson2124 Рік тому +6

    Another Norm Pattis interview! This guy is a giant and I can listen to him all day.

  • @taz0k2
    @taz0k2 Рік тому +4

    Great interview!
    I don't know much about law just happened to see Pattis closing statements in the Alex Jones trial.
    Pattis seemed to be a "character" so I decided to search for more of him, found this interview and oh boy I'm happy I did.
    He has courage, convictions, perspectives and he is well spoken and intelligent.

  • @luttrelll5517
    @luttrelll5517 Рік тому +3

    I am here from the amazing Law and Legitimacy podcast. I hear it is available on many podcast platforms. Hosted by the great Normmmmmm Pattis

  • @trumpsaid3550
    @trumpsaid3550 Рік тому +3

    👍💯🇺🇲

  • @Johnny-ng6xz
    @Johnny-ng6xz Рік тому +1

    GET TONY BUZBEE ALSO

  • @markwilliams7845
    @markwilliams7845 Рік тому +1

    I felt like when that exchange happened between AJ and the lawyer during the cross was happening, it was kinda like a bait and a switch. He started a fight with AJ and when AJ would counterpunch on the lawyers inflamatory arguments the lawyer would be like look AJ is attacking these poor families when really AJ was attacking the lawyers inflamatory , biased and flawed arguments and i guess is was effective when you have a jury that that might not be very intellectual

  • @deborahhershey3045
    @deborahhershey3045 Рік тому

    AJ had a reach of 5 hundRED milLION whilst Jesus only had 5 THOUsand to FEEd

  • @RG-iw7py
    @RG-iw7py Рік тому +1

    Advocate Anonymous - love it:)

  • @DearMe247
    @DearMe247 Рік тому

    Alex didn't murder those children but he paid the price for it

  • @deborahhershey3045
    @deborahhershey3045 Рік тому

    I agree w/Norm so I don't understand why he doesn't appeal? It's not like AJ has that kind of $ so why not go for broke when yer busted for exercising yer 1st AMENdment rights?

    • @thejdhe7681
      @thejdhe7681 8 місяців тому

      1. For civil cases often a bond is set, and they don’t want too/can’t post it
      2. Alex Declaring bankrucy likely shot himself in the foot on that front
      3. He is only there because he stone walled defense (up to seemingly lying about medical emegerancies to the judge), alex and his lawyers caused their own grief

  • @bradfordwhite2101
    @bradfordwhite2101 Рік тому +1

    Good guy Man!