Is better than the PS5 version. Crisper and smoother in native 4k. With dlss even smoother and more plastic but minimal loss of finest detail. 4090/13900k/64gig ram
Its strange that you didn't mention the horrible mouse camera stutter which is present on pc. A hotfix addressing jittering on mouse-controlled camera movement, some crashes, and more for The Last of Us Part I on PC is slated for Tuesday. A larger patch with additional fixes will be deployed later in the week.
yeah i was shocked as well. this horrible mouse stutter is still present in the uncharted pc port even after the raw mouse input patch it got. its obvious when panning and doing it back to back with a controller than the mouse its just jerky and not smooth at all. as for the game i too have a 4090, but have a 5950x as a cpu and 32gb of ram and nvme drive. i noticed that my commited ram usage was hitting 36 gb !!!! (not v ram system ram) and i was getting lots of frame time spikes. i have nothing else open in the background so not sure why im using more ram when i was play 4K ultra preset and Basically have the same system as you i honestly dont think this is a good port. with the poor memory management the game has and high system requirements, i think its not justified compared to how uncharted pc port ran. people that have 16gb of system ram and a mid range gpu (3070 or 2080 Ti) should not be getting poor performance like they are
The game is wildly inconsistent on my system. 7950X3D, 4090, DDR5/64GB/6000MHz/C36. When it runs well, it looks incredible. Then the FPS will half, frametime stutter becomes constant, and GPU utilization drops for no reason. Literally all in the same scene.
Thanks for this update 👍😇 I’m actually building the same setup but with 32GB ram …. Interesting feedback. Although I usually wait about 2-4 weeks with most game titles before buying / playing as day one fixes and some glitches / performance issues are usually resolved by this time.
im having the same issues. have a 5950x 32gb ram 4090 nvme game drive. fps is solid on my end im just getting bad frame time spikes and micro stuttering running the game at 4k native ultra preset.
You can't run this on a potato PC, where anything below a 4090 is classed as a potato. If you can play this on ultra maxed settings this game is absolutely awesome.
The option to have Ultrawide cutscenes with a disclaimer that there might be bugs / glitches is fantastic, I wish more games would do this. Otherwise I'm forced to mod the game anyway when possible.
All I heard from U "it's a good game which's true btw & the game run good for me I got great experience!! " Wtf dude of course it will run perfect for U you got an overkill Rigs!! but have you seen the Vram 12.gGb & Ram 24Gb this is insane It's like they optimized the game only for High tier Rigs nvr tested on other pc This is a grab cash garbage we saw a lot of crash & glitch everywhere the game run like Ass on mid range & 3080 & many other GP & CPU They even set a statement saying w
I usually like your PC port videos but I feel like you are too positive on some of these. Look at Digital Foundries video. The PS5 version actually is the best version. Also the FPS is pretty low for a non ray traces game even tho you are running a 4090.
I have a 4090 as well. I was using a 9900k too. I upgraded to 13700k and I saw a big difference. Just letting you know if you're thinking up upgrading. Take it easy, Joker.
I have an i5-13600KF, 32 GB DDR 3600, Windows 11 Pro 22H2 PC and played the initial on a 10 GB RTX 3080. I set the game to its recommended 1440p High preset, as per the system requirements sheet, and enabled DLSS Quality. I had constant crashes between to 2 and 15 minutes into the game, and every time until DLSS was accidentally 'lost' after Wednesday's 36 MB patch and defaulted to native rendering. Since then I have been able to play it on four occasions for over an hour and each time I exited the game of my own accord not because it crashed. I am now using a 4080 and it seems to play great on the Ultra preset with VRAM to spare, which is nice after all the recent games I had played on my 3080 (Hogwarts Legacy, Resident Evil 4 Remake and Diablo IV Beta, where I had to forego RT or lower the texture settings to prevent stuttering or crashes). Still don't have DLSS though which is odd as I did a clean reinstall of the 531.41 driver and most other games run fine with DLSS and frame generation. And, no, I am not running a pirated version, it is a legit copy on Steam.
Sell higher end GPUs at way inflated prices and in less than 2 years games suddenly exceed their capabilities by a country mile requiring a new GPU upgrade. If this is not a collaborative effort at planned obsolescence what is? I am not playing their game within the games.
This was a really good update, is nobody even talking about how much more optimized 1.05 feels? The loads are quicker, less loads in general, shaders much faster, gane more stable and better framerate and frame pacing too. A really solid patch. It's a huge one but a necessary one. The game is in a much better state now
Respect for not piling on and trashing the game because everyone else is. You have to review the game in front of you. I think due to the amount of VRAM you have on that card you've bypassed most of the issues others have been having. I'm on an overclocked 3080ti system which seems like just enough to get 70-90fps at 1440p with everything on ultra. I do know people have had a lot of issues but for me personally it's running ok. There's just the odd freeze every hour or so.
I seen people with 8GB vram running the game fine, it's mostly those people who expect the game to work fine at 1080p ultra or even 1440p ultra just for reality to hit them with low vram.
CPU memory heaps because they're stuffing uncompressed full resolution textures into VRAM rather than bothering to use a proper material streaming system for textures. Like every other unoptimized shitshow that's come out recently.
I fist tried on my 7950x3d 7900xtx system and thought the same, that this was a pretty good port! Then I tried it with my 3950x 2080 super system and yikes … runs terribly. I have to use a mixture of low settings and DLSS balanced to get around 60 fps.
I'd love to see you running the game another time with a more up to date CPU. I feel like even my 13600kf is working really hard for this game with 3080ti, DLSS @60fps.
You kidding. His cpu is nice enough you making it seem like he needs a i9 or something. Games like this is how companies make money. Game isnt optimized = Itch to upgrade..
@@DETERMINOLOGY I switched from an 9900kf a little over after 13th gen came out, just some months ago. I know first hand what the 9900kf is capable of. That's not the issue though. I am curious to see how a more up to date CPU can handle this game with a rtx 4090. As I have seen my 13600kf work relatively hard with the game locked to 60fps. Even RE4 remake was utilizing the CPU about as much as this game but while running at 120fps. You feel me?
@@DETERMINOLOGY its nice but compared to 13th gen intel its quite a bit slower like quite a bit even if u compare it to i5 13th gen K-version ,he would cetrainly gain some FPS and higher 1% lows also
@@DETERMINOLOGY Sony and it's developers make dick from you upgrading your CPU. To think this is some kind of conspiracy is laughably stupid. It's simply one of their better looking games made by one of their poorest developers.
@@zodwraith5745 You clearly didnt read did you. Dont worry most people dont I said AMD and NVIDIA makes money off you by upgrading alot. Meaning if games isnt optimized more often you start to look at your gpu funny and willing to upgrade for it. AMD and NVIDIA gets money for it and under the table the devs get money as well. This been going on. If every game worked perfectly on pc no need to upgrade. Meaning no reason to upgrade meaning AMD and NV doesnt eat as much. As i said gpus like the 4070 Ti and even 4080 Are strong should be able to handle this game nicely but since its unoptimized it makes your gpu look trash. And for that many people already talking 50 series lol just to fix pc devs mistakes.
You did not mention that your card is using insane level of vram which is 16 gb If I use rdr2 which is one of the best games in market or latest witcher 3 or any other the max vram usage would not be above 8gb
Apart from the vram usage, I'm blown away by the quality of the graphics .. its been the best looking game , a real next gen graphics compared to the other 2023 games .. and I havent had any crashes /issues so far in my 4hrs of gameplay .. if you know what to keep at ultra and low, it plays well .. with my 3080, I managed to keep all the textures ultra except the dynamic objects to low , and all other settings at ultra , I'm consistently getting 90 fps ( I set framerate to 90) .. so it's fine for me and I'm having a blast ...
Is it really making proper use of the CPU cores.....or is just pegging them ......back near the end of SLI , profiles that just maxed the GPU load of the second card , but didnt really improve performance, sadly was a gooe enough for most folks....if its REALLY using the cores, great, if it just dumping heat and consuming power, not so great.
I have no problems running the game at 80+ fps without stuttering or crashes, 5900x 32gb 6800XT 16gb, 1440p ultra FSR Quality. No complains, runs super smooth and no bugs yet.
I don't understand why this game feels like its 30 fps despite the FPS counter showing me 100 + on my 4090? It has to be because of my CPU, no? I am also using a 9900k
try playing with a controller. currently the mouse input is horrible. its stuttery and jittery. not smooth at all. even with raw input enabled. night and day difference with a controller
I use a controller I never cared for the keyboard and mouse thing.. I grew up gaming on consoles so when I moved over to PC gaming the controller kinda just stuck. I don't play competitive and a lot of PPL do just fine with controller's anyway..
Calling this port great cause it runs good on a 4090 doesn't mean it's a good port the game runs like crap especially on 8gb cards even a 3080 struggles playing this game on ultra at 1440p, don't say the game is a amazing port cause it runs fine on the best GPU on the market.. 😂
doesnt look THAT good with that super PC u have, Dead Space Remake graphics are better and demand less, WHYYY?? RDR2 in ultra is nicer too... am i right? Edit: the scenes in the game look spectacular! but not the gameplay itself
I got the game and on launch it crashed telling me that I do not have the latest nvidia drivers, ok downloaded the drivers, the game crashed again and again and again, installed the current patch at that day, game crashed and crashed on launch. Uninstalled the game, installed again, installed the patch, the game crashed again, heck, I was ready to delete it, forgot about for few minutes and said let's give it one more try, magically the game started running in its own, I was like *** is this, magic? :))) Waited about 1h for the shaders to load, everything on low, 1920x1080, I am running it on laptop. A playable experience but too much shuttering, mouse camera shutter like crazy. Played a bit and then played later on a bit more and came after few hours to play again, the game ran totally smooth, no shutter, nothing, I was like *** is this, magic? How *** this game fixes itself??? :)) On Low looks really bad, really really bad and uses a ton of resources....
This and Hogwarts Legacy is demanding which these 2 are also popular. Games like this is the reason why we "think" our gpus is weak when its not the case its the game. Example a 3080 / Ti / 4070 Ti isnt weak by any means but a unoptimized game will having you thinking "i need to upgrade gpus. Its honestly how nv and amd makes a bit of money Trust if all games were 90% optimized there would be no need to buy a gpu but thats not the case. Rise of the tomb raider is another one that will make a person think twice. As for me i understand the bidness of it so when i tested the game i didnt have "new gpu fever" i just kept going and knew the game wasnt optimized and i have a 4070 Ti that gpu isnt garbage by any means.
it runs like crap way worse with cards bellow 10GB VRAM specially if u are running 8GB or less you won't have great experience but at least they are working on it so i guess it will get better as time pass and more patches will be included
@@tollph3314 What about me with my 4GB rtx 3050 laptop? In the very first attempts to play ( after shaders load ) it constantly used to shutter, mouse shutter and so on, and then after a couple of ours I came back it ran totally smooth, no shutter, nothing, first time playing this game. Low settings, 1920x1080 with DLSS.
@@catalinul1461 well that is strange you mean couple hours same day of play time or in several dies because they did few small patches that should improve a little bit ?
@@tollph3314 Couple of hours mate, honestly, it just started working much better, in the beginning I had a ton of shutters, even after waiting for the shaders to load. I only did install one patch but that before playing a couple of hours later.
It's a pretty terrible port IMO. I'd like the performance to be a little better since I'm mostly around 50-55 fps at 1440p high without any upscaling on my RX 6700 XT but FreeSync mostly takes care of that and there is the occasional stutter dropping my framerates but that's pretty standard considering how piss poor PC ports have been since around the year 2000. But the biggest problem for me is it doesn't process commands from an XBox controller properly. There is huge lag and every 30-45 seconds I'll get a one or two second pause where the game just doesn't respond to any button presses nor movement of either thumbstick. This is a controller I have never seen any lag on and which I had no problem blasting through Malenia and all the other bosses of Elden Ring and was just using it to play Yakuza Like a Dragon flawlessly last night too. But if I plug my DualSense into the PC via USB it controls flawlessly in TLOU Part 1 while with my standard PC controller, eg the XBox controller, the game is completely unplayable. The load times can be horrendous too. Even after compiling shaders to 100% it took me 7 minutes to load into a new game and it's not like I'm running on some old Haswell i5 from 2013 and a mechanical drive. This is off an i5-12400F with a high quality B660 board (MSI Mortar B660m DDR4 which Hardware Unboxed showed was capable of running a 12900k without any throttling and with sane VRM temps) and with the game installed to a pretty decent PCIE-4.0x4 NVME SSD. Also the system RAM usage is excessive. Running with a 2x8GB kit of DDR4-3200 in dual channel I need to close pretty much everything to not get ugly stuttering in the game, since my system RAM usage jumps to about 12-13GB while playing this game if I have closed everything else first. That's pretty ridiculous for settings close to PS5 performance mode when the PS5 is running 16GB unified RAM but on my system I'm at 13GB system RAM usage and 10.8GB VRAM usage. And while it's not Naughty Dog's fault Nvidia built planned obsolescence into their RTX 3060 Ti / 3070 / 3070 Ti / 4060 Ti / 4060 with only 8GB of VRAM on what should otherwise be 1440p gpus, the game still shouldn't crash using 8GB gpus. Also I forgot the FSR implementation is pretty lousy. I get much higher framerates playing native 1440p vs 4k with FSR upscaling from 1440p, which isn't the case when I play Cyberpunk with FSR upscaling 1440p to 4k, Control with RSR upscaling 1080p to 4k (since I wanted to turn RT reflections and RT glass reflections on), Elden Ring with RSR upscaling 1800p to 4k, or Yakuza Like a Dragon with RSR upscaling 1800p to 4k. Haven't tried any other games since getting my 6700 XT, but those four FSR 1440p to 4k seems like almost free upscaling while it's a big performance hit vs running native 1440p in TLOU Part 1.
I would support company if they released right away in decent condition they delayed release to just find out it runs like crap on mid HW specially with 8GB VRAM cards which also includes new cards from NVIDIA so people are upset at right reasons ,at least they are working on it but it should be in good condition right away that is not acceptable.IDK why did Sony hire Iron Galaxy for help with this Port they made one of the worst ports with Batman Arkaham City ,they do not have best reputation for making great PC ports.
Your gameplay have the same annoying mouse jittering as mine when panning the camera around. Fortunately Naughty Dog says next Tuesday's patch is gonna fix it. I just can't play right now. Also, you don't want to be at 99% gpu usage all the time, you should have some headroom like 85% or 90%, because the moment you get into a more heavy scenario that needs more gpu, you are going to stutter, so thats where DLSS helps. I have a 4090 and I'm using dlss quality for that reason, or maybe even balanced would be better.
A game can finally utilize all the cores, RAM, and GPU power, I paid for but, what good is it if the results are so poor? Should it take a $3000 creators PC going balls out for 75-80 fps at 4K? People who paid $700+ for a 3070 ti a year ago certainly feel screwed. New games have come from years behind PC hardware capability to far ahead in months, right at the moment when GPU makers can't sell the box a new GPU comes in unless it's for work. Windows 11 literally advised purchasing a new PC/laptop on its install page, so yes even giant software developers get paid to artificially push hardware sales, its a multi-trillion dollar industry in detox from isolation scalping. Game don't look THAT good.
@@jokerproduction i miss write it as you can see i typed ps4 instead of ps5, but on the same comment later on i said ps5* i did not edit the comment, i typed on mobile.
Anyway my comments is the same, the game have no right to Need more resources than a similar hardware of the ps5 if a hardware similar to the ps5 is having issues it's a shit software optimization.
Thanks Joker... People seem to be exaggerating how "poor" this port is. Many people either aren't waiting for the shaders to finish or are trying to run it on something like the steam deck. It's a really good looking game, so it makes some sense that it's going to be really demanding, not to mention it was made originally for a console.
I tried it on R9 5900x, 32GB 3200 and a GTX 1080 Hybrid. Waitied for shaders to complete, still runs like sh*t. Have to come down to 1080p medium settings and FSR Quality so all the goodness in fidelity is gone. Another Iron Galaxy sh*t port! Game installed on SSD also btw
@catalinul1461 There's also "evidence" that shows the game runs more or less as expected based on the system requirements. There are so many variables to consider. Many people didn't wait for the shaders to finish. You can see this on numerous steam reviews where people have a play time of an hour or less and complain about the performance... There are also many others trying to play on HDDs, steam decks, and other underpowered devices. It's a demanding game, which is completely unsurprising for the reasons I stated above. This isn't a fact or fiction matter. Some people are having a good experience due to waiting for shaders to finish, validating system files, taking care of their computer, running the game on hardware that is actually meant to run it, etc... No port is perfect or ever will be. I've seen far worse, and yet, many are acting like this is the worst they've ever seen. Hence why I said, exaggerated. Hogwarts Legacy had a decent pc version, but I had more issues with it than this. There's always issues, but I don't think the outcry matches the quality of the port.
@@rugby187gaming Your GPU is several years old... what exactly did you expect? Shitty port or shitty expectations? This happens pretty much every time there's a new console generation. About two or so years after consoles come out, pc system requirements go up by a noticeable amount. This is nothing new.
@@balgoth18 Dropping down to 1080p with FSR Quality (so 720p) with medium settings. It's a shi**y port! Hope they fix it soon. Never had these issues with any other Sony ports or recent AA titles. I am aware the specs go up periodically and I'm waiting to get a newer GPU but 720p and still struggling on a GTX 1080 isn't right. As I recall, the GPU requirement for 720p is a GTX 970/1050Ti or that abomination the RX 6500 XT. It's poorly optimised for 8GB and below cards, even the RTX 3070 struggling with it.
Seeing this game in 4K on my 4090 was unreal. I haven’t felt that since I first saw the Xbox 360 King Kong demo.
Is better than the PS5 version. Crisper and smoother in native 4k. With dlss even smoother and more plastic but minimal loss of finest detail. 4090/13900k/64gig ram
Why? The game looks 1:1 like Part 2. It's isn't more visually impressive than Cyberpunk, Doom Eternal or Red Dead Redemption 2.
@@raresmacovei8382 wow lol
Its strange that you didn't mention the horrible mouse camera stutter which is present on pc. A hotfix addressing jittering on mouse-controlled camera movement, some crashes, and more for The Last of Us Part I on PC is slated for Tuesday.
A larger patch with additional fixes will be deployed later in the week.
I’m glad I wasn’t the only one with weird camera stuttering. Thought my PC was just shitting itself
ahh i thought i was trippin, glad to here they are gonna address it. I heard the Uncharted 4 port had the same issue
This is the reason I refunded the game. The main reason buying is using a mouse at high settings I already beat it with controller on console
you can actually see it in Jokers recorded footage here and it looks horrendous and for me would make it unplayable.
yeah i was shocked as well. this horrible mouse stutter is still present in the uncharted pc port even after the raw mouse input patch it got. its obvious when panning and doing it back to back with a controller than the mouse its just jerky and not smooth at all.
as for the game i too have a 4090, but have a 5950x as a cpu and 32gb of ram and nvme drive. i noticed that my commited ram usage was hitting 36 gb !!!! (not v ram system ram) and i was getting lots of frame time spikes. i have nothing else open in the background so not sure why im using more ram when i was play 4K ultra preset and Basically have the same system as you
i honestly dont think this is a good port. with the poor memory management the game has and high system requirements, i think its not justified compared to how uncharted pc port ran.
people that have 16gb of system ram and a mid range gpu (3070 or 2080 Ti) should not be getting poor performance like they are
The amount of options is quite impressive
The game is wildly inconsistent on my system.
7950X3D, 4090, DDR5/64GB/6000MHz/C36.
When it runs well, it looks incredible. Then the FPS will half, frametime stutter becomes constant, and GPU utilization drops for no reason. Literally all in the same scene.
Is the game making use of the threads with the V-Cache properly? Just a thought.
@@XxViciousxX Should be. It's all tied into Xbox Game Bar and it recognizes the game. Not sure what else to do.
Thanks for this update 👍😇 I’m actually building the same setup but with 32GB ram …. Interesting feedback. Although I usually wait about 2-4 weeks with most game titles before buying / playing as day one fixes and some glitches / performance issues are usually resolved by this time.
im having the same issues. have a 5950x 32gb ram 4090 nvme game drive. fps is solid on my end im just getting bad frame time spikes and micro stuttering running the game at 4k native ultra preset.
You can't run this on a potato PC, where anything below a 4090 is classed as a potato. If you can play this on ultra maxed settings this game is absolutely awesome.
CPU a bit bottleneck, but it will run fine with maxed out settings
The option to have Ultrawide cutscenes with a disclaimer that there might be bugs / glitches is fantastic,
I wish more games would do this. Otherwise I'm forced to mod the game anyway when possible.
All I heard from U "it's a good game which's true btw & the game run good for me I got great experience!! "
Wtf dude of course it will run perfect for U you got an overkill Rigs!! but have you seen the Vram 12.gGb & Ram 24Gb this is insane
It's like they optimized the game only for High tier Rigs nvr tested on other pc
This is a grab cash garbage we saw a lot of crash & glitch everywhere the game run like Ass on mid range & 3080 & many other GP & CPU
They even set a statement saying w
I usually like your PC port videos but I feel like you are too positive on some of these. Look at Digital Foundries video. The PS5 version actually is the best version. Also the FPS is pretty low for a non ray traces game even tho you are running a 4090.
I have a 4090 as well. I was using a 9900k too. I upgraded to 13700k and I saw a big difference. Just letting you know if you're thinking up upgrading. Take it easy, Joker.
he already upgraded. he has a 7950X its in his other rig.
@@valkyrie743 amd cpus are stutter fest so 7950x wouldn’t be much smoother then his 9900k.
When the camera pans left or right during the gameplay, the stutter is obviously evident.
Yeah cam pans are the way to test how smooth the gameplay is
What happened to the 7950x?
I was wondering the same 😅
I have an i5-13600KF, 32 GB DDR 3600, Windows 11 Pro 22H2 PC and played the initial on a 10 GB RTX 3080. I set the game to its recommended 1440p High preset, as per the system requirements sheet, and enabled DLSS Quality. I had constant crashes between to 2 and 15 minutes into the game, and every time until DLSS was accidentally 'lost' after Wednesday's 36 MB patch and defaulted to native rendering. Since then I have been able to play it on four occasions for over an hour and each time I exited the game of my own accord not because it crashed.
I am now using a 4080 and it seems to play great on the Ultra preset with VRAM to spare, which is nice after all the recent games I had played on my 3080 (Hogwarts Legacy, Resident Evil 4 Remake and Diablo IV Beta, where I had to forego RT or lower the texture settings to prevent stuttering or crashes). Still don't have DLSS though which is odd as I did a clean reinstall of the 531.41 driver and most other games run fine with DLSS and frame generation. And, no, I am not running a pirated version, it is a legit copy on Steam.
Sell higher end GPUs at way inflated prices and in less than 2 years games suddenly exceed their capabilities by a country mile requiring a new GPU upgrade. If this is not a collaborative effort at planned obsolescence what is? I am not playing their game within the games.
This was a really good update, is nobody even talking about how much more optimized 1.05 feels? The loads are quicker, less loads in general, shaders much faster, gane more stable and better framerate and frame pacing too. A really solid patch. It's a huge one but a necessary one. The game is in a much better state now
Respect for not piling on and trashing the game because everyone else is. You have to review the game in front of you. I think due to the amount of VRAM you have on that card you've bypassed most of the issues others have been having.
I'm on an overclocked 3080ti system which seems like just enough to get 70-90fps at 1440p with everything on ultra. I do know people have had a lot of issues but for me personally it's running ok. There's just the odd freeze every hour or so.
I hope we get TLOU part 2 on PC and the reaction to this port doesn't put Naughtydog off from porting part 2 in the future
Exactly
The port has been ok-ish for those with high tier GPU's, some of those who are using 8GB of VRAM and lower have been having an awful experience.
My 6600xt is crying for help
I seen people with 8GB vram running the game fine, it's mostly those people who expect the game to work fine at 1080p ultra or even 1440p ultra just for reality to hit them with low vram.
@El-Neko Hence, why I said "some".
The CPU usage is nutty.
CPU memory heaps because they're stuffing uncompressed full resolution textures into VRAM rather than bothering to use a proper material streaming system for textures.
Like every other unoptimized shitshow that's come out recently.
I stayed away couse of that problem and system ram usage all over the place and 2 hours to compile shaders. For now no thank you.
I fist tried on my 7950x3d 7900xtx system and thought the same, that this was a pretty good port! Then I tried it with my 3950x 2080 super system and yikes … runs terribly. I have to use a mixture of low settings and DLSS balanced to get around 60 fps.
I'd love to see you running the game another time with a more up to date CPU. I feel like even my 13600kf is working really hard for this game with 3080ti, DLSS @60fps.
You kidding. His cpu is nice enough you making it seem like he needs a i9 or something. Games like this is how companies make money. Game isnt optimized = Itch to upgrade..
@@DETERMINOLOGY I switched from an 9900kf a little over after 13th gen came out, just some months ago. I know first hand what the 9900kf is capable of. That's not the issue though. I am curious to see how a more up to date CPU can handle this game with a rtx 4090. As I have seen my 13600kf work relatively hard with the game locked to 60fps. Even RE4 remake was utilizing the CPU about as much as this game but while running at 120fps. You feel me?
@@DETERMINOLOGY its nice but compared to 13th gen intel its quite a bit slower like quite a bit even if u compare it to i5 13th gen K-version ,he would cetrainly gain some FPS and higher 1% lows also
@@DETERMINOLOGY Sony and it's developers make dick from you upgrading your CPU. To think this is some kind of conspiracy is laughably stupid. It's simply one of their better looking games made by one of their poorest developers.
@@zodwraith5745 You clearly didnt read did you. Dont worry most people dont
I said AMD and NVIDIA makes money off you by upgrading alot. Meaning if games isnt optimized more often you start to look at your gpu funny and willing to upgrade for it. AMD and NVIDIA gets money for it and under the table the devs get money as well.
This been going on. If every game worked perfectly on pc no need to upgrade. Meaning no reason to upgrade meaning AMD and NV doesnt eat as much.
As i said gpus like the 4070 Ti and even 4080 Are strong should be able to handle this game nicely but since its unoptimized it makes your gpu look trash. And for that many people already talking 50 series lol just to fix pc devs mistakes.
I'm also using a 9900k. With a 3080. Even at 60+FPS I still get stuttering. Do you notice that with your 9900k?
With your spec Im sure there is no problem :D
You did not mention that your card is using insane level of vram which is 16 gb
If I use rdr2 which is one of the best games in market or latest witcher 3 or any other the max vram usage would not be above 8gb
I still have major stutters further into the game
Game running in 4K on 3070 Laptop, no issues so far 💪
Apart from the vram usage, I'm blown away by the quality of the graphics .. its been the best looking game , a real next gen graphics compared to the other 2023 games .. and I havent had any crashes /issues so far in my 4hrs of gameplay .. if you know what to keep at ultra and low, it plays well .. with my 3080, I managed to keep all the textures ultra except the dynamic objects to low , and all other settings at ultra , I'm consistently getting 90 fps ( I set framerate to 90) .. so it's fine for me and I'm having a blast ...
Is it really making proper use of the CPU cores.....or is just pegging them ......back near the end of SLI , profiles that just maxed the GPU load of the second card , but didnt really improve performance, sadly was a gooe enough for most folks....if its REALLY using the cores, great, if it just dumping heat and consuming power, not so great.
They could've taken the PS4 version, add higher rez shadows and textures, add DLSS2/FSR2 and call it a day.
it runs ok on my 4080 only problem is stuttering
I have no problems running the game at 80+ fps without stuttering or crashes, 5900x 32gb 6800XT 16gb, 1440p ultra FSR Quality. No complains, runs super smooth and no bugs yet.
I don't understand why this game feels like its 30 fps despite the FPS counter showing me 100 + on my 4090? It has to be because of my CPU, no? I am also using a 9900k
try playing with a controller. currently the mouse input is horrible. its stuttery and jittery. not smooth at all. even with raw input enabled. night and day difference with a controller
Regardless of the reviews im downloading right now. I have a 3080ti so I trust my system to run it with no issues.
I use a controller I never cared for the keyboard and mouse thing.. I grew up gaming on consoles so when I moved over to PC gaming the controller kinda just stuck. I don't play competitive and a lot of PPL do just fine with controller's anyway..
yikes
340watts wtf
Right now the only thing this game is good at its the options menu.
Nice video, thank you for sharing.
Was wondering when this would land.
Been waiting.
pardon ? again with the 9900k ?! what happened ?
Calling this port great cause it runs good on a 4090 doesn't mean it's a good port the game runs like crap especially on 8gb cards even a 3080 struggles playing this game on ultra at 1440p, don't say the game is a amazing port cause it runs fine on the best GPU on the market.. 😂
That doesn't mean its a bad port.
@@jokerproduction If the game is struggling to run on top end hardware from 2 years ago, it's a bad port.
doesnt look THAT good with that super PC u have, Dead Space Remake graphics are better and demand less, WHYYY?? RDR2 in ultra is nicer too... am i right?
Edit: the scenes in the game look spectacular! but not the gameplay itself
I got the game and on launch it crashed telling me that I do not have the latest nvidia drivers, ok downloaded the drivers, the game crashed again and again and again, installed the current patch at that day, game crashed and crashed on launch. Uninstalled the game, installed again, installed the patch, the game crashed again, heck, I was ready to delete it, forgot about for few minutes and said let's give it one more try, magically the game started running in its own, I was like *** is this, magic? :))) Waited about 1h for the shaders to load, everything on low, 1920x1080, I am running it on laptop. A playable experience but too much shuttering, mouse camera shutter like crazy. Played a bit and then played later on a bit more and came after few hours to play again, the game ran totally smooth, no shutter, nothing, I was like *** is this, magic? How *** this game fixes itself??? :))
On Low looks really bad, really really bad and uses a ton of resources....
i wanna see how the game is doing on pcs that the average person has
Thanks for the report...
However this series is dead to me after what they did to Joel.
it is wrong to check a game on a gpu like this..
Great video …🤘🏻
This and Hogwarts Legacy is demanding which these 2 are also popular. Games like this is the reason why we "think" our gpus is weak when its not the case its the game. Example a 3080 / Ti / 4070 Ti isnt weak by any means but a unoptimized game will having you thinking "i need to upgrade gpus. Its honestly how nv and amd makes a bit of money
Trust if all games were 90% optimized there would be no need to buy a gpu but thats not the case. Rise of the tomb raider is another one that will make a person think twice. As for me i understand the bidness of it so when i tested the game i didnt have "new gpu fever" i just kept going and knew the game wasnt optimized and i have a 4070 Ti that gpu isnt garbage by any means.
it runs like crap way worse with cards bellow 10GB VRAM specially if u are running 8GB or less you won't have great experience but at least they are working on it so i guess it will get better as time pass and more patches will be included
@@tollph3314 What about me with my 4GB rtx 3050 laptop? In the very first attempts to play ( after shaders load ) it constantly used to shutter, mouse shutter and so on, and then after a couple of ours I came back it ran totally smooth, no shutter, nothing, first time playing this game. Low settings, 1920x1080 with DLSS.
@@catalinul1461 well that is strange you mean couple hours same day of play time or in several dies because they did few small patches that should improve a little bit ?
@@tollph3314 Couple of hours mate, honestly, it just started working much better, in the beginning I had a ton of shutters, even after waiting for the shaders to load. I only did install one patch but that before playing a couple of hours later.
Hey Joker, is your 9900k overcklocked?
Locked at 4.8 and undervolted.
@@jokerproduction Do you mind me to tell what's the voltage you use?
It's a pretty terrible port IMO. I'd like the performance to be a little better since I'm mostly around 50-55 fps at 1440p high without any upscaling on my RX 6700 XT but FreeSync mostly takes care of that and there is the occasional stutter dropping my framerates but that's pretty standard considering how piss poor PC ports have been since around the year 2000. But the biggest problem for me is it doesn't process commands from an XBox controller properly. There is huge lag and every 30-45 seconds I'll get a one or two second pause where the game just doesn't respond to any button presses nor movement of either thumbstick. This is a controller I have never seen any lag on and which I had no problem blasting through Malenia and all the other bosses of Elden Ring and was just using it to play Yakuza Like a Dragon flawlessly last night too. But if I plug my DualSense into the PC via USB it controls flawlessly in TLOU Part 1 while with my standard PC controller, eg the XBox controller, the game is completely unplayable. The load times can be horrendous too. Even after compiling shaders to 100% it took me 7 minutes to load into a new game and it's not like I'm running on some old Haswell i5 from 2013 and a mechanical drive. This is off an i5-12400F with a high quality B660 board (MSI Mortar B660m DDR4 which Hardware Unboxed showed was capable of running a 12900k without any throttling and with sane VRM temps) and with the game installed to a pretty decent PCIE-4.0x4 NVME SSD. Also the system RAM usage is excessive. Running with a 2x8GB kit of DDR4-3200 in dual channel I need to close pretty much everything to not get ugly stuttering in the game, since my system RAM usage jumps to about 12-13GB while playing this game if I have closed everything else first. That's pretty ridiculous for settings close to PS5 performance mode when the PS5 is running 16GB unified RAM but on my system I'm at 13GB system RAM usage and 10.8GB VRAM usage. And while it's not Naughty Dog's fault Nvidia built planned obsolescence into their RTX 3060 Ti / 3070 / 3070 Ti / 4060 Ti / 4060 with only 8GB of VRAM on what should otherwise be 1440p gpus, the game still shouldn't crash using 8GB gpus.
Also I forgot the FSR implementation is pretty lousy. I get much higher framerates playing native 1440p vs 4k with FSR upscaling from 1440p, which isn't the case when I play Cyberpunk with FSR upscaling 1440p to 4k, Control with RSR upscaling 1080p to 4k (since I wanted to turn RT reflections and RT glass reflections on), Elden Ring with RSR upscaling 1800p to 4k, or Yakuza Like a Dragon with RSR upscaling 1800p to 4k. Haven't tried any other games since getting my 6700 XT, but those four FSR 1440p to 4k seems like almost free upscaling while it's a big performance hit vs running native 1440p in TLOU Part 1.
The 4090 is insane! my 3090 is jealous
Just finished last of us, loved it. everything run smooth apart from the mouse jitter, I'll play new game+ next after the Tuesday fix
I would support company if they released right away in decent condition they delayed release to just find out it runs like crap on mid HW specially with 8GB VRAM cards which also includes new cards from NVIDIA so people are upset at right reasons ,at least they are working on it but it should be in good condition right away that is not acceptable.IDK why did Sony hire Iron Galaxy for help with this Port they made one of the worst ports with Batman Arkaham City ,they do not have best reputation for making great PC ports.
PC Port Simulator
Your gameplay have the same annoying mouse jittering as mine when panning the camera around. Fortunately Naughty Dog says next Tuesday's patch is gonna fix it. I just can't play right now. Also, you don't want to be at 99% gpu usage all the time, you should have some headroom like 85% or 90%, because the moment you get into a more heavy scenario that needs more gpu, you are going to stutter, so thats where DLSS helps. I have a 4090 and I'm using dlss quality for that reason, or maybe even balanced would be better.
A game can finally utilize all the cores, RAM, and GPU power, I paid for but, what good is it if the results are so poor? Should it take a $3000 creators PC going balls out for 75-80 fps at 4K? People who paid $700+ for a 3070 ti a year ago certainly feel screwed. New games have come from years behind PC hardware capability to far ahead in months, right at the moment when GPU makers can't sell the box a new GPU comes in unless it's for work. Windows 11 literally advised purchasing a new PC/laptop on its install page, so yes even giant software developers get paid to artificially push hardware sales, its a multi-trillion dollar industry in detox from isolation scalping. Game don't look THAT good.
if this is a port from teh ps4 version any hardware similar to the ps5 should run without any issues, otherwise the game is very bad optmized.
This isn't even on the ps4 bro
@@jokerproduction i miss write it as you can see i typed ps4 instead of ps5, but on the same comment later on i said ps5* i did not edit the comment, i typed on mobile.
Anyway my comments is the same, the game have no right to Need more resources than a similar hardware of the ps5 if a hardware similar to the ps5 is having issues it's a shit software optimization.
they're probably gonna charge you again for it for ray tracing :D
nice
first
Thanks Joker... People seem to be exaggerating how "poor" this port is. Many people either aren't waiting for the shaders to finish or are trying to run it on something like the steam deck. It's a really good looking game, so it makes some sense that it's going to be really demanding, not to mention it was made originally for a console.
They are not exagerating, these are facts, based on real evidence, I've seen people with high ends PCs experiencing mouse camera shutter :)))
I tried it on R9 5900x, 32GB 3200 and a GTX 1080 Hybrid. Waitied for shaders to complete, still runs like sh*t. Have to come down to 1080p medium settings and FSR Quality so all the goodness in fidelity is gone. Another Iron Galaxy sh*t port! Game installed on SSD also btw
@catalinul1461 There's also "evidence" that shows the game runs more or less as expected based on the system requirements. There are so many variables to consider. Many people didn't wait for the shaders to finish. You can see this on numerous steam reviews where people have a play time of an hour or less and complain about the performance... There are also many others trying to play on HDDs, steam decks, and other underpowered devices. It's a demanding game, which is completely unsurprising for the reasons I stated above.
This isn't a fact or fiction matter. Some people are having a good experience due to waiting for shaders to finish, validating system files, taking care of their computer, running the game on hardware that is actually meant to run it, etc...
No port is perfect or ever will be. I've seen far worse, and yet, many are acting like this is the worst they've ever seen. Hence why I said, exaggerated. Hogwarts Legacy had a decent pc version, but I had more issues with it than this. There's always issues, but I don't think the outcry matches the quality of the port.
@@rugby187gaming Your GPU is several years old... what exactly did you expect? Shitty port or shitty expectations? This happens pretty much every time there's a new console generation. About two or so years after consoles come out, pc system requirements go up by a noticeable amount. This is nothing new.
@@balgoth18 Dropping down to 1080p with FSR Quality (so 720p) with medium settings. It's a shi**y port! Hope they fix it soon. Never had these issues with any other Sony ports or recent AA titles. I am aware the specs go up periodically and I'm waiting to get a newer GPU but 720p and still struggling on a GTX 1080 isn't right. As I recall, the GPU requirement for 720p is a GTX 970/1050Ti or that abomination the RX 6500 XT. It's poorly optimised for 8GB and below cards, even the RTX 3070 struggling with it.
I think some have mistook this for Reddit haha 😂
Shared