100% Win Rate
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 сер 2024
- Subscribe for more funny chess content, and join my Discord server at:
/ discord
How I win my first 4-digit ELO game:
• The WORST Drawback
🎵 Music used in this video:
Xomu - Last Dance:
• Xomu - Last Dance
#chess #ChessBut #drawback
Some drawbacks are clearly not meant to be revealed.
"If opponent does X, you immediately lose" are badly designed, imo. They should check the condition at the end of your turn, not theirs, so you have at least a chance to counter.
however, chess simp is not a coward
@@Teodzero or they should be much harder than this.
@@Teodzero they should add a feature where your oponent doesn't know what is your drawback. I feel like that would help a lot.
Take the hint, Simp! Pick whether you can safely reveal or not. Don’t cower away from being a coward!
Last move actually blundered your queen, a true 100 player
Oh wow. That's tough to see but you are right.
What's the line?
@@jaideepshekhar4621b4 queen has no squares
@@jaideepshekhar4621 b4 traps the Queen combined with the drawback.
@@jaideepshekhar4621 Qb5 Qa3 bxa3, I believe
edit: also Qb5 Qxc3 bxc3
If you really can't be talked out of suicidally revealing drawbacks that become impossible once your opponent knows about them, here's an alternative: Each game choose between either revealing the drawback, or taking on a secondary challenge from the usual Discord suggestions.
Of course not. He isn't a coward
This.
That first game was a waste of time. This isn't an attack: I like this channel a lot. But that result was preordained.
@@sasha0263 Yeah, the coward was the opponent. If someone reveled that drawback I'd just ignore it.
I feel like the hard core chess people are here watching the show for some kind of actual challenge and show of skill. I personally appreciate it when it happens, but am largely here just for Simp's wacky personality 😂 and I suspect a lot of people are similar to me. So we don't mind when something like that happens
@@Ivashanko The destination isn't as important as the road you take to get there.
Simp made that game fun, i don't consider it a waste of time.
Dang. "Your pieces cannot move adjacent to where they were" is practically "Lame Duck with extra steps, except you can still castle."
The 2nd opponent had a hard drawback of "you can't move your king"
...the 3rd Simp drawback was you can't move any piece one square...which includes your king. It's the same drawback but harder.
Technically you'd be able to castle, so it's not *strictly* worse, but you are right that the rest of it more than makes up for that
I had a suspicion when I played that one opponent who immediately revealed their drawback that it might have been you! And yes, I even remember that final blunder... (I was the "Can't move your king" guy)
Ouch, you really threw that one, haha.
you committed a blunder
haha, i liked how you revealed your drawback before resigning!
@@i_guess108 That way it didn't just look like a rage quit xD
chess, but its on youtube
E4
@@theermac6024B6
E5
A3
Nf3
That second guy's drawback was brutal
Nevermind the third guy had it even worse
The second guy had a drawback that was significantly easier than simp's third drawback (note that Simp couldn't move his king).
@seronimo__7735 simp could have still castled his king in the third one, but that's about it
The first guy had a ridiculously tough drawback too; if Simp hadn't revealed his own drawback, it would've been an easy win because it basically boiled down to "your first check must be checkmate".
hasnt simp had the opponent's third drawback before? or did he just do a challenge similar to it
Chess simp's math is immaculate. Especially ratios and percentages are his strong suit. That's asian brainpower right there!
chess, but its actually 2D
bishops and queens cant squeeze in between pieces, and knights cant jump over pieces
why that name ? chess is already a 2D game
chess but pieces are fat af
@@quentinpauleau5668 Chess is actually 3D because of the Knight. Look it up
@@quentinpauleau5668
More specifically, I think they mean "the game now needs the game pieces to move geometrically in 2D".
You'd have to define how the knight moves then. Is it 2 along 1 across? Or 1 across and 2 along? Or 1 straight and then 1 diagonal (or in the other order)?
6:41 - One of those times you really wish it was "Pieces (not pawns!)"
Ok but these drawbacks are getting more and more ridiculously impossible. Even the opponents drawback was insane.
The moment the bishop checks and the opponent just went frozen and revealed his drawback desperately before resignation*
third guy needed to play more aggressive just by his drawback alone.
especially considering he just needs to get the queen right next to your king.
Gotta appreciate SImp Asian level maths.
2:37 ah yes, e5
Is it d5?
lame duck: immobilizes the king
leaps and bounds: immobilizes the king and then some
At 7:04, after Qg5, opponent can just Qh5!!. The white queen is invincible and can gobble up many things
any drawback having to do with something that the opponent does just seems unfair and dumb
Chess is a game about trying to control what your opponent does, forcing moves and punishing mistakes. Seems fair to me.
@@bloodleader5 you can't force all the moves, your opponent won't always play the best lines
I appreciate that both players in the first game had a challenge that explicitly mentioned a lose condition.
1:52 okay that drawback being placed there is cap
I can see it making sense, as long as it's not revealed. Aggressively provoke an early bishop and knight trade, and then you basically don't have a drawback until late game where both rooks get developed.
Say it again in English for the rest of us.
When you tried to take with the pawn at 6:35 😂
leaps and bounds is far sighted with movement limitation, making the king and pawns unable to move, making it almost literally impossible to win with it due to a buffed version of a already difficult drawback.
2:37 e5, plays d5
The next drawbacks will be "Get scholar's mate or lose"
"All pieces can only move two squares"
"Long castle deletes your queen, short castle deletes both rooks, also you must castle within 8 turns or lose"
I mean, just going off the trends here
I really appreciate your inclusion of non binary people in the intros. You don't have to do it, but it's cool. Thanks
Shut up liberal
7:30 nice queen blunder
For game one's opponent: seeing such a devastating drawback revealed and not having the courage to reveal back makes them a coward. Which means Simp won game one in the way that matters most: not being a coward.
I'm not sure you would have lost that first game if your bishop touched the opponent's bishop. The drawback said _"your opponent_ has pieces adjacent..." so I imagine your pieces don't factor in.
Abstinence, You Best not Miss, Eye for an Eye, and Bloodthirsty weren't simply restrictions. They're alternate loss conditions. 4/6 of the drawbacks in this video alone are "if X then game over"
why.
Personally I think bloodthirsty and eye for an eye were OK drawbacks, you best not miss is hard (since you can't check until checkmate) and abstinence is just stupid because the opponent can just randomly do a thing and win.
100% win rate, like the kid who mixed multiple sun screens together cause he wanted a higher SPF
This guy's maths will never be wrong. Absolute Genius!
I love this saga mainly because of the op
Chess but if your opponent play a brillant move you lose, and you can't checkmate before making a brillant one
Seeing 100% winrate,
Other people: 😮
Simp subscribrers: 👀
by the title i thought you finally got an asian friend to teach you math
Asian maths- winning 2/3 =100% win rate
Chess, but I can't do basic math.
reveal your drawback only after your 5th move, so you would have time to set up
69% win rate
Is it just me or have these (or lose) drawbacks been added recently?
Bloodthirsty has been around for a while.
@@WingedEspeon But also You Best Not Miss and An Eye for an Eye?
Add to this that Abstinence also decrees a certain lose condition and this video seems pack full of such handicaps while I don't recall seeing such in previous episodes.
@@xCorvus7x abstinence has been around for a while too
@@WingedEspeon How long a while do you reckon?
Longer than Simp's series on that site is going?
Terrance Howard level win rate calculations.
6:38 restriction on pawn capture looks wrong. As for me, adjacent means orthogonally connected, so diagonal moves should be allowed.
You probably use either Pythagorean or Manhattan distance.
Anyway, that would mean that Bishops would be exempt from the challenge. So, I'd still use Adjacent, but add ", not pawn," between Piece and Adjacent. Because you can't even _en passant_ under the rule as written.
I'd argue about the math on your win rate percentage but I'm not Asian so I have no idea how numbers work.
last opponent could have easily won with Qa6 but I guess he forgot that none of those pawns would be a threat and Qxe7 would be a checkmate
3:14 u 4got the king is protecting the pawn
1: wrong timestamp. (It's 4:00)
2. Ever heard of a battery?
Just... change the format to not reveal the challenge - oh, I get it. You're harvesting engagement from the comments telling you to stop revealing the drawback. Well played.
999999% winrate
I had this drawback and won.
why is that first drawback so easy on the difficulty scale
66% percent of the time Simp wins 100% of the time
dayum that’s hard
03:50 can't u take horsey on e5 after Bxc3?
ah u write it on screen sry
2:40 e5??? thats d5
In the first game 1:30 are your own pieces really included in pieces your opponent has?
thats not how percentages work
In 1st game I'd prefer 5. Nf3
Video 193 of asking simp to play fps chess
stop revealing your drawback...
3:13 Bc2 exists... but then ofc Qxc2
5:34 bro failed adding 30
The first drawback was rated as "easy"?? How??
you are so smart in chess but where the fuck did you learn percentages from
3:55 Isn't that the B file?
2:42
Simp doesn't know how percentages work
2:41 Unneckessary?
67% win rate not 100%
2/3 win rate = 66.66%. Not 100
4:35
unneckasory??
What's wrong with subtitles? 0:31 1:22
2:38 did bro just say e5 when it is supposed to be d5? It’s over, video unwatchable.
1/1 = 100% 2/2 = 100% 2/3 = 66.6%
1 = 100%
1 + 1 = 200%
200% - 1 = 100%
yoooooo 8 minute simp video
Why do simp's opponent's play so poorly?
They are obviously unpaid actors /s
please just stop revealing drawback. would rather see you play this normally. or maybe you could decide whether to reveal or not using python random module instead
not first
I know that you know that double tapping the comment likes it but did you know tripple tapping it makes you reply?
I tried double clicking your comment but it didn't work
@@syockit Mobile only features
[redacted]
@@chri-k shhh dont tell them
@@shaharporat507 but why
Day 53
Chess, but the game must end in a Bishop and knight checkmate
Comment for this video:rip to the dead people who weren't mentioned in the start of the video
this isn't a fun challenge idea :/ basically no 100 elo game lasts into the end game. This also doesn't force simp to do any interesting work around throughout the middle game. The idea of a bishop knight checkmate is cool but just doesn't fit this channel.
@@peterjohansson1828 he can just play other challenges until a game ends that way and use it for the video
This challenge doesn't sound fun at all. Also, he doesn't take suggestions from UA-cam comments.
first
i’ll be the one to say that your math is wrong, as a win rate is calculated by the number of wins divided by the number of total games (your win rate is 66%)
And I’m also Asian, henceforth our ability to be right by default cancel out
Mathematically you are correct, but you failed to apply the AMAF (Asian Mom Adjustment Factor) for reporting percentages reflecting personal performance, as your mom taught you to never come home with anything less than 100%, you raise all denominators to the power of 0.