What happens if you connect Windows XP to the Internet in 2024?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 тра 2024
  • Have you ever wondered if it's true you can instantly get malware? In this video we discover how dangerous XP really is.
    Follow me on Twitter - / atericparker
    Disclaimer: The content in this video is for education and entertainment purposes to showcase the dangers of malware & malicious software. I do not encourage any form of illegal hacking, nor do I encourage the usage of game cheats, cracks or hacks.
    Cracks are sometimes shown to highlight the dangers of software piracy, my content is not intended to teach anybody how to pirate, or maliciously hack.
    More Malware Investigation Videos:
    → Cyberpunk 2077 Highly Compressed: • Video
    → The latest "NORD" Malware - Nordsecured: • The latest 'NORD' Malw...
    →🧧VIRUS WARNING🧧 NEW Optifine for Minecraft 1.16 SCAM: • 🧧VIRUS WARNING🧧 NEW Op...
    → The wilkreate UA-cam stealer virus that started this whole trend: • Fake sponsor DESTROYS ...
    Much of the music in my videos comes from the UA-cam audio library, especially this amazing music creator: / @patrickpatrikios2050 .
    Outro Music
    Track: Lost Sky - Where We Started (feat. Jex) [NCS Release]
    Music provided by NoCopyrightSounds.
    Watch: • Lost Sky - Where We St...
    Free Download / Stream: ncs.io/WhereWeStarted
    (C) Eric Parker 2024
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,8 тис.

  • @SuperLlama88888
    @SuperLlama88888 16 днів тому +1794

    Windows XP: Spyware comes from the internet
    Windows 11: Spyware comes pre-installed

    • @sauliusvitkauskas8741
      @sauliusvitkauskas8741 11 днів тому +86

      windows 11 should be: i am spyware

    • @laserslime
      @laserslime 11 днів тому

      @@sauliusvitkauskas8741
      Windows 10: Spyware comes pre-installed
      Windows 11: I am the spyware.

    • @JackD0ff
      @JackD0ff 10 днів тому +44

      ​@@sauliusvitkauskas8741 That’s what he said, you just didn't get it.

    • @eylemuyavul3055
      @eylemuyavul3055 9 днів тому +2

      fr?

    • @ManteIIo
      @ManteIIo 9 днів тому +8

      Since W10 already pre-installed

  • @mendyc158
    @mendyc158 20 днів тому +5735

    Gonna be honest.. I thought you had to at least browse around and what not. Not expecting them to be able to infect you just by being online

    • @EricParker
      @EricParker  20 днів тому +1411

      That's the danger with old out of support OSes. On newer OSes (in my other videos) I do have to, in this one I didn't run anything manually.

    • @Deniil2000
      @Deniil2000 19 днів тому +753

      it's crazy how much vulerabilities get discovered in Windows over time. There are certainly still undiscovered ones in 10 and 11

    • @1shadz
      @1shadz 19 днів тому +67

      @@EricParker would I be fine on 7 with a anti virus?

    • @temst2561
      @temst2561 19 днів тому +426

      ​@@1shadzno

    • @potatoeater6961
      @potatoeater6961 19 днів тому +226

      ​@@1shadzno

  • @brah9249
    @brah9249 18 днів тому +2360

    this wouldn't have happened if you used Windows XP Gangster Edition

    • @FunnycatBUH
      @FunnycatBUH 14 днів тому +132

      Common rookie mistake that one

    • @AI_Paul
      @AI_Paul 14 днів тому +39

      The what edition

    • @mo-s-
      @mo-s- 13 днів тому +99

      ​@@AI_PaulGangster edition

    • @spungbopscarepans
      @spungbopscarepans 13 днів тому +119

      Windows XP Gangster Edition was discontinued in 2014. he should’ve upgraded to Windows 7 Ghetto Edition.

    • @justaguy-69
      @justaguy-69 13 днів тому +65

      I run win XP sp3 on internet daily.
      it runs fast as hell on 512mb ram and 1 .5 gig hd.
      it NEVER spies on me or does sneaky windows crap in the back ground.
      i actually have 32 gigs ram and 1.5 terabytes of ssd HD.
      i use a firewall called "tiny firewall" that i've used since 2001 and i dug thru the OS years ago to shut off many services.
      i know each and every folder , file and dll in win32, it would be impossible for one person to know all the os files and folders and dll's and what they do and dependencies in win 10 or 11.
      it does exactly what i tell it to and NOTHING i don't ask it to- THAT my friends in never going to be the case with any windows operating system since xp and never will be in the future.
      its small clean fast and MINE!
      i double boot it with mint virgina and am getting used to linux now slowly but i will always love my XP!!

  • @mario-bjornpeikert1572
    @mario-bjornpeikert1572 19 днів тому +4301

    Things to consider:
    - Windows XP is used by:
    - some military operations
    - as backend for machines for medical purposes (e.g. X-Ray, MRT, ...)
    - as backend for CNC-machines
    - as terminal backend for pos-Systems (Point Of Sale)
    - as terminal backend for ATMs
    - SysOps are reluctant for changes, if systems are running
    - If you would change the software on some machines, they would loose their certificates allowing them to be run.
    - Networking a Windows XP machine is that much more comfortable than sneaker-netting it.
    If you think about it, the scan for Windows XP machines connected to the internet starts to make an awful lot of sense!

    • @theRealTolentino
      @theRealTolentino 19 днів тому +81

      what if those get hacked

    • @kanna2515
      @kanna2515 19 днів тому +170

      my pos system runs windows 10, can't say the same for other stores and those other devices
      and on top of that, our pos's are only connected to the network for software updates, and even then still have 0 internet access

    • @docvolt5214
      @docvolt5214 19 днів тому +105

      Wager treatments and water supplies too, and many many many industrial machines

    • @Tabako-san
      @Tabako-san 19 днів тому

      ​@@theRealTolentino If they aren't already hit, they're all on internal closed off systems or cut off from any external devices at all. The military doesn't operate on the open web.

    • @Taz6688
      @Taz6688 19 днів тому +120

      Microsoft extended support solely because so many machines still used XP, think the last was some commercial/developer subscription, I was surprised when I had a scan and the system was running XP I expect they could have fixed the holes in the operating system, as they still have issues now, people will always look for the backdoor no matter what.

  • @Notixe
    @Notixe 20 днів тому +3797

    Lol! The way the malware instantly crashed your browser when you searched for it is hilarious.

    • @EricParker
      @EricParker  20 днів тому +459

      Reminds me of league of legends old anticheat (although it would close the game if you had executables with certain names open). I'm not sure what the intention is, if I read about the malware I'm gonna think it's not malware?

    • @quantumroblox
      @quantumroblox 19 днів тому +12

      Now that’s firewall

    • @Son1cSeren1de
      @Son1cSeren1de 19 днів тому

      I have a malware on my pc that when i search something like "Avast Antivirus Download for Windows 11" or search for any antivirus it instantly crashes my browser.

    • @F-15E_StrikeEagle
      @F-15E_StrikeEagle 19 днів тому +41

      10:47 btw

    • @user-in2cs1vp6o
      @user-in2cs1vp6o 19 днів тому +113

      ​@@EricParkerprobably to block users from searching how to remove it. Maybe the malware has a vulnerability?
      It makes sense. Back in the Vista days, you couldn't just use your phone to look up the malware. Single pc family? Now you can't look up how to fix it.

  • @myoriginalname
    @myoriginalname 19 днів тому +2282

    Good thing those days are gone, now we willingly let corporations install built-in spyware in our OS’s

    • @OurNewestMember
      @OurNewestMember 19 днів тому +134

      It's more like you pay them money for them to tell you that you don't actually control the system and by using it you're already being exposed to risk (in addition to your data exposed to breaches in their data centers)

    • @PhilLesh69
      @PhilLesh69 18 днів тому +105

      Every time I buy a new phone or set up a new laptop or other system I diligently configure all of the privacy and security settings to make the device more secure and to protect my privacy.
      Every time they update or upgrade my devices, they methodically go in and undo all of those changes.
      It's like being stripped naked and shoved outdoors to expose you to the elements. They want you to be as vulnerable as possible because your data is a commodity and profit overrides every other concern.

    • @thisemptyworm4677
      @thisemptyworm4677 18 днів тому +4

      Laughs in AME 10 / 11

    • @3ofSpades
      @3ofSpades 18 днів тому

      Windows 10 ameliorated is the real windows. Don’t let micronuts fool you with their bad apple impersonation.

    • @Andrew-bl8eq
      @Andrew-bl8eq 18 днів тому +26

      Install GNU/Linux if you don't want to

  • @enderbo
    @enderbo 4 дні тому +11

    the frame showing he manually installed the spyware: im about to ruin this man's whole career

  • @smiths7317
    @smiths7317 19 днів тому +1911

    This video is great example why router's all have a firewall built-in.

    • @brodriguez11000
      @brodriguez11000 19 днів тому +63

      Artifact of how IPv4 does things ( NAT ). IPv6 has an actual firewall.

    • @soundspark
      @soundspark 19 днів тому +37

      @@brodriguez11000 You have to have an actual firewall in IPv6 because the router issues globally routable IPs to every IPv6 enabled device. That said I do also have static private IPs on my devices too, which I use for the same reason I have static IPv4 allocations on my router.

    • @alpharudiger1193
      @alpharudiger1193 19 днів тому +12

      @@DonaldDucksRevenge Why

    • @DonaldDucksRevenge
      @DonaldDucksRevenge 19 днів тому +10

      ​@@alpharudiger1193 Every address unique. Every address identfiable. A chicken in every port. Two apps in every layer. Stop all the downloading

    • @alpharudiger1193
      @alpharudiger1193 19 днів тому +37

      @@DonaldDucksRevenge I dont understand what you mean XD

  • @cirkulx
    @cirkulx 6 днів тому +85

    - searches for a worm (2:50)
    - disables the firewall
    - says its unsafe

  • @ChickenCaeser
    @ChickenCaeser 19 днів тому +939

    Fun Fact: There's machines online that sniff for older windows connecting to the internet that are vulnerable and auto infect them

    • @Sypaka
      @Sypaka 19 днів тому +133

      Oh i learned that the hard way, followed by hacking attempts on the RDP port, instantly banning the main "Administrator" account. And that's why the built-in account should be passworded, even if it's disabled by default.

    • @ChickenCaeser
      @ChickenCaeser 19 днів тому +45

      @@Sypaka Hahaha yup but not many know that. There's other gnarly stuff to by-pass the password and give yourself admin over the admin :)

    • @amitakartok
      @amitakartok 19 днів тому +57

      How do they do that? Are they periodically pinging every possible IP address just to see if there's anything new connected or something?

    • @sisamusudroka3000
      @sisamusudroka3000 18 днів тому +36

      ​@@amitakartokdude just said how like 2min into the video

    • @bruhmandude555
      @bruhmandude555 18 днів тому +33

      Pov you feed a victorian child a gas station burito

  • @colindragan9352
    @colindragan9352 14 днів тому +384

    Firewalls becoming commonplace is probably among the TOP reasons computer viruses have declined so much since the 2000s. Yes, there is still tons of malware, but the days of computer worms infecting millions of PCs via the internet are (hopefully) over.

    • @papajohnscookie
      @papajohnscookie 9 днів тому +5

      Yes that and obviously a big reason is because NAT is commonplace now.

    • @GGigabiteM
      @GGigabiteM 4 години тому

      ​@@papajohnscookie NAT is only commonplace on IPV4, IPV6 has no concept of NAT. All IPV6 addresses are globally routable, the only thing standing between you and the world is a firewall in IPV6.
      There is an unofficial NAT for IPV6, but its use is heavily discouraged by some IPV6 purists.

  • @theokkali467
    @theokkali467 20 днів тому +1572

    Next Vid: I travel back in time to 2009 and then I click on every ad.

    • @EricParker
      @EricParker  20 днів тому +177

      Would love to do one on spy sherrif but AFAIK it's lost media.
      Kinda cool how these worms just keep spreading themselves.

    • @theokkali467
      @theokkali467 20 днів тому +36

      @@EricParker As in, make a normal clicking on only sketchy ads vid, but style it like if it's from 2009. (also, FIND DA MALWARE!!!)

    • @Kizoky.
      @Kizoky. 19 днів тому +15

      @@EricParker I recall SpySheriff being part of a huge Malware collection somewhere, although I do not know if that collection still exists today

    • @Tay12345
      @Tay12345 19 днів тому +2

      Do this!

    • @dottych
      @dottych 19 днів тому +8

      @@Kizoky. I had spysheriff installed on a vm once, it shouldn't really be hard to find

  • @Vim-Wolf
    @Vim-Wolf 17 днів тому +151

    Once went to a new client who said their Win 2000 server was running slow. Turns out their onsite 'expert' had put it in the router's dmz cause they didn't know about port forwards. It was running slow because everyone else in the world was running their own software on it.

  • @pundauoun
    @pundauoun 19 днів тому +791

    When Conhoz.exe started up MalwareBytes just said "You know what fuck this I'm going to burger king"

    • @thatoneglitchpokemon
      @thatoneglitchpokemon 17 днів тому +21

      going for the new whopper 🔥

    • @thatoneglitchpokemon
      @thatoneglitchpokemon 17 днів тому +88

      Conhoz - A non-malicious process (C) 2024 Microsoft Compilation

    • @windws7137
      @windws7137 15 днів тому +25

      @@thatoneglitchpokemon Microsoft compilation🤪🤪🤪

    • @thatoneglitchpokemon
      @thatoneglitchpokemon 8 днів тому

      @@windws7137 yes ikr lol

    • @attilavs2
      @attilavs2 5 днів тому +4

      "Screw you guys, i'm going home" - MalwareBytes, probably

  • @pxldsilz6828
    @pxldsilz6828 19 днів тому +380

    Windows XP is still extensively targeted, as it is still used heavily in embedded and point of sale applications, as well as systems set up once and never modified because they never stopped working.
    Windows 95 would see much less malware on the internet, it's used in far fewer places as XP. There's also not as much to gain from running a bot net of Windows 95 boxes, or ransoming their disks.
    What would be spicy would be an early version of Windows NT, such as 3.X or 4.0 on the open net. Those are similar to modern windows under the hood, and are susceptible to pretty much every exploit in the book for the Windows operating system, winnuker and ping of death, for instance.

    • @AndreaIppolitoIppo
      @AndreaIppolitoIppo 15 днів тому +17

      my thoughts exactly. Plenty of ATMs as well, IIRC

    • @PeTTs0n88
      @PeTTs0n88 10 днів тому +3

      It's also a more work to make something run on both NT and Win9x/DOS systems as it's a completely different kernel. Way more NT around, and always (since its introduction, pretty much) has been in more professional environments. And if you're trying to exploit specific vulnerabilities, it'll just be a headache.

    • @user-tv6sw3vt9q
      @user-tv6sw3vt9q 2 дні тому +1

      Look at any old-timey SCO when a company's IT is messing with it, and you'll see they're running Windows XP or PE with poorly secured BIOS usually.

  • @playlist5455
    @playlist5455 19 днів тому +269

    A fun thing to do is turn on logging on the firewall and watch the huge number of scans and probes that continuously happen. Thankfully, we have firewalls that work.

  • @gibzrival1565
    @gibzrival1565 7 днів тому +31

    Can't wait 20yrs from now to see "What happens if you connect Windows 11 to the Internet in 2044?"

  • @stefannilsson2406
    @stefannilsson2406 19 днів тому +562

    I had no idea that just connecting machines with obsolete operating systems to the internet could get you malware.

    • @blakecarson6555
      @blakecarson6555 18 днів тому +299

      It can't. He's specifically operating in a way that circumvents modern protections that are built into our routers.

    • @thecooldude9999
      @thecooldude9999 18 днів тому +221

      @@blakecarson6555It’s funny how he specifically mentions that in the beginning of the video, but so many people in the comments still don’t get it. I guess it goes to show how little most people know about networking.

    • @blakecarson6555
      @blakecarson6555 18 днів тому +24

      @@thecooldude9999 true. I think the only reason I know some of this stuff is because of an old Cisco networking cert. And I'm CERTAIN that I'm way behind the times nowadays, because I took that course when xp was brand new.

    • @imark7777777
      @imark7777777 18 днів тому +79

      That's why the firewall was the single most useful thing to get turned on by default and implemented in all of our modem router combination.

    • @randomgamingin144p
      @randomgamingin144p 17 днів тому +50

      thats why routers have firewalls, unlike before where all the ports on your ip address were open to the outside world
      combine this with windows xp being full of security vulnerabilities, and its no surprise this can happen.

  • @Sam-hv8zr
    @Sam-hv8zr 12 днів тому +95

    2:50 nice browser window down there on the task bar, surely you werent doing anything with it?

  • @petersmythe6462
    @petersmythe6462 13 днів тому +24

    The funny thing is, malware in this environment is so competitive with other malware that there are actually good reasons for the malware itself to enable and install security features and software to try to mitigate the threat to its operation posed by other malware.

    • @dubbyplays
      @dubbyplays 5 днів тому

      A malware enabling its own anti-other viruses just to keep minding its job is the most wtf funny and worrying thing I ever heard about computers

  • @TheGreenYoutuber
    @TheGreenYoutuber 6 днів тому +8

    What he doesn’t tell you is that he purposefully took down his firewall

  • @GeneralKenobi69420
    @GeneralKenobi69420 18 днів тому +72

    Needs a unregistered hypercam watermark and some 009 Soundsystem

  • @SilvercattoOsom
    @SilvercattoOsom 20 днів тому +381

    God, I can hear the old-school techno beats just by seeing that Windows XP interface.

    • @RedlineA2Y145
      @RedlineA2Y145 18 днів тому +6

      Omnibus 😅

    • @virgo113
      @virgo113 17 днів тому +13

      Dreamscape!

    • @nikostalk5730
      @nikostalk5730 16 днів тому +9

      to be honest - this was a trance music, not a techno

    • @robertbolzicco9995
      @robertbolzicco9995 14 днів тому +1

      ....but it was the best windows OS lol. Windows 3.5 for the win! XP was great but nothing fancy. It was a nice change from the garbage 7/8/whatever those funny flow bubble menu ones were.

    • @ifeelcoke4347
      @ifeelcoke4347 7 днів тому

      @@nikostalk5730 🤓

  • @_M_643
    @_M_643 19 днів тому +260

    From what I understand the machine is in some sort of DMZ (demilitarized zone) where all of its ports and activity is exposed to the internet which is not a realistic scenario with routers unless you specifically do it.
    You can use XP with internet connection perfectly fine under normal circumstances as your router doesn't expose any ports to the outside.
    Even Windows 10/11 in DMZ could get infected, so this video doesn't make much sense on blaming outdated systems for that.

    • @studydude
      @studydude 19 днів тому +30

      I was thinking the same as I use XP for streaming movies across my LAN, I imagine you can get this result on any system if you proactively open it up, i can see Eric is confused by the processes in the task manager, not knowing if they are supposed to be there or not. Would be interesting to see Dave's garage do this same test.

    • @raphaelmendesdasilva3858
      @raphaelmendesdasilva3858 16 днів тому +22

      I most think this is not to blame old systems, but to have fun.
      Also what you explained about routers is already explained in the beginning of the video.

    • @diogopombo9273
      @diogopombo9273 15 днів тому +11

      Well, Windows 8 onwards has antivirus natively.
      Even if they are connected to a DMZ, as soon as the infection attempt begins, Defender should try to act, assuming the user does not disable it, of course.
      Maybe the result wouldn't be the same, just speculating...

    • @zp944
      @zp944 15 днів тому +21

      Yes exactly. This is showing what would happen if you connected windows xp directly to the internet TODAY, as would have been the case with anyone using a dialup modem back in the day.
      Today, not really an issue

    • @maxpoulin64
      @maxpoulin64 14 днів тому +26

      It was mentioned in the video but in XP's time people were usually directly connected to the Internet. When using dial-up Internet you get assigned a public IP address directly, no router no NAT no nothing. Same was true for a long time with cable and DSL Internet. Pretty much until people started having more than one device that can connect to the Internet and the need for a router. Then came WiFi and and soon enough ISPs were just shipping modem+router+WiFi combo boxes and now everyone has an implied "firewall" in the form of NAT. That's also where DMZ became a thing, now that you have a NAT box, you need to give users a way to replicate the functionality.
      And actually no a properly configured Windows 10 isn't automatically vulnerable if put directly on the Internet, or even a Windows XP machine back then. XP is so vulnerable because it's unpatched to all the new exploits that came out. These things exploit bugs in servers that Windows runs in the background for file sharing and remote desktop. A fully patched Windows 10 should have all of the known ones fixed, so it's mostly safe to expose RDP and SMB directly on the Internet, because it'll work as intended and deny access correctly. I'm not saying it's a good idea, but it shouldn't get instantly infected like XP would with its hundreds of known vulnerabilities. People do that all the time to set up game servers and stuff and remotely manage them with RDP. Just, you block off those ports from the Internet and set up a VPN server instead so you can remote in from that.
      Windows 10 will be XP levels of vulnerable once it's as old as XP is today and new exploits are found. I actually ran XP directly on the Internet back then, had the firewall on as you'd expect and an antivirus. Never caught anything. The main attack vector back then was Java/Flash on websites and malicious ActiveX applets in IE, or just snuck into file downloads on sketchier sites and crap you downloaded on Kazaa/eMule/LimeWire.

  • @SupertoastGT
    @SupertoastGT 13 днів тому +28

    21 processes. Back when MS had lean operating systems. This was why XP was great.

  • @psychoticgiraffe
    @psychoticgiraffe 6 днів тому +27

    As an experienced IT and cybersecurity professional, I need to address several critical issues and inaccuracies in your video, highlighting why your approach is not only misguided but potentially harmful.
    Recklessness:
    Connecting Windows XP to the internet without any security measures is irresponsible and dangerous. No one in their right mind would do this-they'd at least have the firewall on. By performing this stunt and declaring XP dangerous online, you ignore fundamental cybersecurity practices essential for protecting systems. XP is no more dangerous than Windows 11 with all firewalls and security turned off.
    Misleading Assertions:
    Your claims about Windows XP's firewall and antivirus inadequacy oversimplify the issue. XP's security was appropriate for its time, and modern operating systems have evolved to counter contemporary threats. With necessary POSReady updates and other security fixes, XP can be much more secure than you show in your video, especially if additional security measures are implemented.
    Technical Inaccuracies:
    Your superficial malware analysis lacked depth and the necessary tools for thorough examination. This could mislead viewers about the nature and handling of malware. You failed to mention that modern viruses often can't run properly on XP, that much ransomware is incompatible, and that XP isn't filled with bloatware or default spyware like Windows 11.
    Presentation Flaws:
    You did not discuss the importance of legacy system management, patch management, and the role of virtual machines in safely running outdated software.
    Instead of merely showing vulnerabilities, you should have highlighted best practices for securing systems, the importance of regular updates, and modern cybersecurity tools.
    Additional Points:
    Conducting such an experiment without proper safeguards is foolish. Contrary to your approach, I have used Windows XP securely online for years with all necessary protections in place and no infections. There are security solutions that can make XP more secure than a stock Windows 11 installation, despite its inherent vulnerabilities.
    You also failed to show what happens if you do this on a newer OS. Turning off the firewall and security on any computer will cause issues, regardless of OS, especially if your router is old and many ports are open. Under the right circumstances, a Windows 11 PC could be just as vulnerable as the XP install in your video. If your experiment was conducted on a VM, it further diminishes the relevance of your findings.
    In the retro community, videos like this scare potential retro gamers away with misinformation. It would be more beneficial if you clarified the misinformation and provided relevant info on how to secure an XP install rather than promoting fearmongering.
    Your video could have been a valuable educational resource, but it falls short of being useful.

    • @dubbyplays
      @dubbyplays 5 днів тому +3

      I love your counter argument: I always love to hear other opinions, especially if criticisms, so I can get a more full picture instead of assuming stuff and get in trouble.
      If only people like you could make a video explaining the stuff with a visal guide, it would be amazing for anyone else but making videos is not that easy and this comment does a lot on its own.
      Thank you, thakst peple like you who exists and choose to give their opinion instead of saying "nah, who cares, I don't want to waste time typing something nobody is gonna read". I would also have read without replying but I felt the need to let you know how grateful I was to you for sharing this pearl of IT knowledge.
      (excuse me for mistakes I made, I'm not an English speaker and it's 4 AM with no sleep due to test anxiety, too lazy to check back what I wrote and use GPT to correct my stuff)

    • @psychoticgiraffe
      @psychoticgiraffe 5 днів тому +1

      @@dubbyplaysthank you for this, I’ve personally built a lot of retro rigs so seeing the positive reaction to my rebuke is encouraging; I will eventually do a video response to further insinuate my experience.

    • @koliwier882
      @koliwier882 4 дні тому +1

      check the taskbar at 2:50 this video is bullshit

    • @Chromeno
      @Chromeno 3 дні тому +5

      he literally failed to download a worm directly from the vm (2:50 last taskbar tab) then moves his mouse away to download it from his real pc

    • @psychoticgiraffe
      @psychoticgiraffe 3 дні тому

      @@Chromeno yeah that's similar to what happens if I try to download a worm into my real XP rig, it just doesn't work.

  • @mariocamspam72
    @mariocamspam72 20 днів тому +406

    This one was too funny with all the random obviously safe processes with totally inconspicuous names such as "ftp" and "conhoz" (published by Microsoft compilation Inc. Ltd. Corp. TM)

    • @MickmickWashesThings_Official
      @MickmickWashesThings_Official 19 днів тому

      Yes, FTP is safe, it is a client, conhoz is oubious that it is fake, the real program is "conhost" the parent of cmd it is NOT stored in TEMP and has not this 2024 looking icon

    • @adds-kz3oc
      @adds-kz3oc 19 днів тому +3

      ​@@MickmickWashesThings_Official it was a joke dude

    • @theswissconfederation
      @theswissconfederation 19 днів тому +1

      @@MickmickWashesThings_Official r/woosh

    • @81de
      @81de 19 днів тому +4

      ​@@adds-kz3oc what did he say he deleted his comment

    • @Paxmax
      @Paxmax 19 днів тому +16

      Being a bit of a minimalist single minded freak, only doing a few things at a time, shutting excess processes down, you get the hang of who/which processes looks legit even without any programming/system admin knowledge. Buuut, the bloated operating systems coming out of Redmond nowdays makes it harder and harder to see the sus programs.

  • @Th3Gr33k
    @Th3Gr33k 15 днів тому +171

    Computer with no firewall gets hacked... I don't think it would matter what system you had.

    • @justaguy-69
      @justaguy-69 13 днів тому +50

      LOL
      I run win XP sp3 on internet daily.
      it runs fast as hell on 512mb ram and 1 .5 gig hd.
      it NEVER spies on me or does sneaky windows crap in the back ground.
      i actually have 32 gigs ram and 1.5 terabytes of ssd HD.
      i use a firewall called "tiny firewall" that i've used since 2001 and i dug thru the OS years ago to shut off many services.
      i know each and every folder , file and dll in win32, it would be impossible for one person to know all the os files and folders and dll's and what they do and dependencies in win 10 or 11.
      it does exactly what i tell it to and NOTHING i don't ask it to- THAT my friends is never going to be the case with any windows operating system since xp and never will be in the future.
      its small clean fast and MINE!
      i double boot it with mint virgina and am getting used to linux now slowly but i will always love my XP!

    • @godnmaste
      @godnmaste 12 днів тому +5

      @@justaguy-69 damn that's cool ngl

    • @Syping
      @Syping 11 днів тому +2

      While a Linux server with firewall disabled: No problem in 9 years

    • @Hyperion62
      @Hyperion62 11 днів тому +14

      @@justaguy-69 You sound like someone who would like Arch Linux.

    • @DingoYabuki
      @DingoYabuki 11 днів тому +4

      That's why this video has a clickbait title.

  • @computerblade
    @computerblade 6 днів тому +37

    The real question is, why did you disable the firewall? and why did you search up 'xp sp3 worm'?

    • @kevinsahm5577
      @kevinsahm5577 3 дні тому +10

      I guess he has no answer for that. This video is not good and spreads misimformation on the use of older versions of windows connected online in 2024

    • @computerblade
      @computerblade 2 дні тому +1

      @@kevinsahm5577 Exactly!

  • @Nieczytelny_official
    @Nieczytelny_official 11 днів тому +14

    on 2:50 you can see xp sp 3 worm on taskbar bruuuuuhhhh

    • @xpt
      @xpt 8 днів тому +1

      @@pippinproductions definitely.

    • @EpppicRecks
      @EpppicRecks 8 днів тому +1

      More people need to like so everyone will see

  • @bonkmaykr
    @bonkmaykr 17 днів тому +41

    Since home routers usually have tight firewalls by default, the average person is unlikely to get hit this hard. But hackers are after valuable business, not us. Businesses and governments typically have their ports open to serve legitimate users.
    Unless you deliberately remove your firewall, Windows XP is not nearly this unsafe. It's still not a good idea to use it for anything you care about, but this is not a realistic representation of what the average person would experience.

    • @shivanshshivi811
      @shivanshshivi811 8 днів тому +1

      what does "having port open" mean

    • @bonkmaykr
      @bonkmaykr 8 днів тому

      @@shivanshshivi811 A firewall creates rules for a network and blocks communication that looks suspicious, usually if it's unsolicited. Part of this process is closing ports. You have to manually whitelist ports to open (this is called Port Forwarding) in order to allow other people to connect at any time.
      If you have any other questions, Google them, I'm not your encyclopedia

    • @scrung
      @scrung 6 днів тому

      @@shivanshshivi811 it means you tell your computer to listen for incoming messages but only messages that say they want to enter with a certain ’key’ number, this is the port (it’s just a number). if you have a server application, it will listen for messages on some port number. usually, in your router’s settings, you will have to set it to send messages with that port number to specifically to your computer

  • @AndreDeLimburger
    @AndreDeLimburger 19 днів тому +168

    Try it on Windows 95. I wonder if there is any active malware still compatible.

    • @MarioKartSuperCircuit
      @MarioKartSuperCircuit 19 днів тому +24

      Probably not, I doubt most of the Internet functions on Windows 95

    • @Sypaka
      @Sypaka 19 днів тому +28

      I was running WinXP x64 for a couple years. I got infected by something so stupid, which actually refused to run after deploy.

    • @AndreDeLimburger
      @AndreDeLimburger 18 днів тому +5

      @@MarioKartSuperCircuit The Ping of Death, now I remember,

    • @AndreDeLimburger
      @AndreDeLimburger 18 днів тому +10

      @@MarioKartSuperCircuit TO be honest, I was kinda surprised to learn XP malware is still actively out there.

    • @stenspeed1
      @stenspeed1 18 днів тому +8

      Why Most of them are forever in internet , they are out of controle , and no human Not using them

  • @cameronl1859
    @cameronl1859 17 днів тому +43

    2:55 You have a search result open in IE here. You didn't just "leave it to cook". What sites did you visit after opening IE for the first time?

    • @xpt
      @xpt 8 днів тому +11

      look at the taskbar, bottom right. hes manually infecting the system with a worm.

  • @Seleneous
    @Seleneous 10 днів тому +41

    Hi! No hate, loved this video, I wanted to ask about your search at 2:53 where it said "xp sp3 worm"? Are you sure you didn't just... install the malware your self and claim that you got it remotely?

    • @tumblingdryer8887
      @tumblingdryer8887 9 днів тому +4

      manually disabling router firewalls and purposely opening all ports will do this - however, literally just having the default firewall on your router on blocks almost all attacks like this. my XP computer that i’ve had running since 2017 hasn’t been infected once just from leaving the firewall up.

    • @xpt
      @xpt 8 днів тому +13

      thats exactly what he did

    • @bernds6587
      @bernds6587 7 днів тому +2

      oh I am sure he did.

    • @cameronl1859
      @cameronl1859 4 дні тому +2

      Yeah, this video is fake

  • @nathanrye
    @nathanrye 19 днів тому +350

    one thing you dont make clear is that you are connecting to internet without firewall and you have all the ports open. if you did this with a new computer and turned off the firewall you would be in danger of malwares too, since people can connect to your computer using port scanners. if you have a windows xp computer and connect to internet using your router there shouldnt be any danger

    • @obongonigga
      @obongonigga 19 днів тому

      You'd only be in danger if you are running vulnerable or improperly configured software on your system

    • @iner1_
      @iner1_ 19 днів тому +40

      Most of ISPs give same IP Address to multiple people making exposing services impossible without tunneling unless customer asks isp to give them a dedicated IP while isn't any best practice such machine should be pretty much safe from network vectors and the only danger would be user's actions and for the browsers nobody gotta find a zero day on mypal just to get in your computer because your average folk are likely not a targeted person they would instead target more high profile people.

    • @nathanrye
      @nathanrye 19 днів тому +3

      @@iner1_ true

    • @lucsoft
      @lucsoft 19 днів тому +9

      Windows is so insecure it’s crazy. Like Linux is completely fine without a firewall as well you need to configure it to be insecure

    • @antikommunistischaktion
      @antikommunistischaktion 19 днів тому +53

      ​@@iner1_ That's not entirely accurate. If cgnat didn't allow port forwarding at all you wouldn't have functional internet. You just can't assign your own port forwards with cgnat.

  • @TheRadiastral
    @TheRadiastral 18 днів тому +105

    Many people in the comments seem to have missed, that Eric disabled the firewall completely, no AV of any kind etc. An XP machine will be just fine, if it's firewalled, updated as far as it can be and you only open the exact port(s) that you need and only forward those on the router. I've been running a SOAP/REST web application (written in Delphi XE) on a XP SP3 VM for a little more than a decade. Why XP and not Win 7, 8 or 10? 120MB RAM used vs 800 MB RAM used, plus double CPU usage and a 6-fold increase in taken HDD space. I scan its VHD montly, with various AV scanners - nothing ever touches it. But it's protected by a Linux-driven firewall distro, behind NAT, the router exposes just 1 single port and I only allow connection to that port from specific subnets on the internet. No hacking into that, almost no way.. What Eric did, is like leaving an old luxury car, completely unlocked, all windows down, key in the ignition, on a dark city center street. It would get stolen in no-time. But once you enable the built-in security as you should (no key, lock all doors and windows etc) and add a few modern features (immobilizer, security guard etc), your car most likely won't get touched at all. So keep that in mind when watching this.

    • @snappy4368
      @snappy4368 14 днів тому +5

      Thank you for your reply! I have always heard that the hard truth with these outdated OS's is that you won't get instantly infected from being on the internet UNLESS you have p clue what your doing, in which popular opinion suggests otherwise (though, it keeps clueless people from experimenting on these systems with no experience, so not all bad)
      I wish he would have made it more clear that he made himself more vulnerable and that there were still ways to keep these systems somewhat safe-ish, rather then stroking this popular opinion, which isn't as one sided as people think it is. I hope these comments like yours get more likes!

    • @faisalfirdausiinn4708
      @faisalfirdausiinn4708 13 днів тому

      Your comment is GOLD.

    • @omnitone
      @omnitone 13 днів тому

      thank you. i knew i was smelling some serious bullshit.

    • @sijahel6284
      @sijahel6284 12 днів тому +6

      On top of that
      It's stated in the intro that the system is directly connected to open internet, not like a typical modern home setup that uses a router and nat your connection to isp wan then nat again to the internet
      So it essentially has a public IP right at that computer which is a really bad idea
      TBH, I don't think even windows 10/11 will survive with the same setup

    • @wnsjimbo2863
      @wnsjimbo2863 11 днів тому

      It's never ok to run eol os my dude(unless it has not access to the internet at all )

  • @ivancomp_inside
    @ivancomp_inside 11 днів тому +7

    "Windows XP wor..." On taskbar... No, you definitely didn't search for Windows XP worms
    I used Windows 7 as my main OS until 2022, I used WinXP on virtual machine, both were connected to the internet. I was sometimes running antivirus scans as you did tn the end of your video. But get no malwares

  • @daniel-andersson
    @daniel-andersson 17 днів тому +14

    To be clear though, you deliberately set it up to be as vulnerable as possible. I have a laptop running Windows XP with all updates and patches installed (most critically the patch against EternalBlue) and it's been a seamless experience. Surprisingly capable machine - by which, I mean, it can do 1080p video streaming!
    Anyhow, even though I think it's basically safe to use, I'd still never log into anything important on it :P but it's definitely not a "connect and get pwned" situation.

  • @Zoomer2008
    @Zoomer2008 14 днів тому +14

    What is this nonsense? You've got rid of all the built-in protection mechanisms (however weak), fired up the beyond old IE and went on to browse malicious websites. I bet you can do the same with windows 11. Go on, disable the defender and the firewall (and UAC for good measure) and do the same. I'd never watch your content, but it was shoved through xda-developer news. I guess, it's time to ban them from my feed.
    For the record, I have a couple of vintage XP PCs, which are perfectly fine for more than 10 years. There are proper techniques to isolate and protect them (including a couple of AV solutions that support xp to this day). And of course you would limit your browsing substantially with only known good sources.

    • @DingoYabuki
      @DingoYabuki 11 днів тому

      It's just another pointless clickbait video. I wish UA-cam wouldn't recommend this garbage.

  • @Animal_lives_matter
    @Animal_lives_matter 3 дні тому +8

    This is fake, he manually disabled all of XPs security features and then manually installed a worm 2:50 bottom right of taskbar.

  • @guffingtonreal
    @guffingtonreal 9 днів тому +10

    they're cooking you on twitter for very good reasons this is stupid

    • @RandomDude-Z840
      @RandomDude-Z840 7 днів тому

      For what??

    • @scrung
      @scrung 6 днів тому

      yeah it’s kind of dumb but who cares about what nerds on twitter say loooool

  • @shovel_salesman
    @shovel_salesman 19 днів тому +49

    >turns off firewall
    >exposes computer to the entire internet
    >gets virus
    >WHAAAAAAAAAAAT

    • @abandonedmuse
      @abandonedmuse 18 днів тому +10

      Who would ever have thunk it I KNOW lol this video is click bait

    • @DingoYabuki
      @DingoYabuki 11 днів тому +6

      It's a stupid clickbait video with a stupid title.

    • @maciejpilarski3581
      @maciejpilarski3581 10 днів тому +2

      I think nowadays, much more danger ,than EOL is EOB(end of brain) syndrome,
      But better don’t trust me, I’m just a little, alone hater. ;-P

  • @user-gg4vq
    @user-gg4vq 6 днів тому +6

    You have just bought an old house. The doors are old as well, and the deadbolts are a little rusty. You think that rusty deadbolts cannot secure your house and thus you decide to remove it. Now you cannot lock a door, but still you are convinced this way you are much more safe than you were, for some reason.
    The sun sets. Now it is a perfect time for thieves to rob houses, since most people are sleeping at that time, including you. Suddenly, some thieves attempt to break in your house, but then, as soon as they witness deadbolts scattered across the floor instead of being in the door, they realize the house is unlocked. Fascinated by the treasures in the house, more specifically your important stuff, they start grabbing them all and destroying your house, because why not. Then, they peacefully leave your house.
    Sun rises, and you wake up. But something seems weird. Your house looks like a bomb has exploded inside. Everything feels so empty. Everything you left on the table, is gone. You get convinced it is the house's fault for letting the stuff disappear, without rethinking about your past actions, which actually costed you all your important belongings

  • @MikkoRantalainen
    @MikkoRantalainen 16 днів тому +18

    I remember running Windows 2000 around year 2000 and even then, I did configure it to close *every TCP port* it listens by default. Then you don't need firewall because you have zero ports open. Would work perfectly well for Windows XP, too. And yes, getting all the default ports closed is pretty hard because Microsoft practically backdoored Windows by default to make it easier to connect to LAN.
    If you run WinXP today, I wouldn't be overly surprised if it gets infected with all the TCP ports closed.

    • @Ramog1000
      @Ramog1000 13 днів тому

      and remember windows also gets backdoors for authorities, not like it matters in 99% of the cases. Can be a pain once they are public ofc but then they often are just patched out anyways.

    • @MikkoRantalainen
      @MikkoRantalainen 11 днів тому

      @@Ramog1000 No backdoor has ever been demonstrated. If you think about the special government registry values in Windows registry, those are used by administrators of government office computer networks to avoid trusting Microsoft certificates and only trust their own certificates.

  • @justsumguy2u
    @justsumguy2u 19 днів тому +49

    My first o/s (back in the early 2000's) was XP; even running it through a DSL modem with firewall turned on, it was still a security cesspool. You didn't have to visit shady sites, viruses came wrapped in so many different ways

    • @nikostalk5730
      @nikostalk5730 16 днів тому +2

      dunno what are you talking about, used XP since 2006 (not sure), got my own pc at around 2008, XP SP1, then SP2, then 2000 SP4, SP3, got about everything possible could be, even got "winlocker" for searching a nice p....n vid (lol), but reblocked my machine straight from it (lol) and deleted (woaahh) with no issues.
      XP SP3 was not so bad at security, and Outpost Security did a powerful job to stop 85-90 troubles from being on your pc (never used since 2013-2014)
      Dunno how do you get malware, i've periodically checked my non-protected XP SP3 machine with newest signature bases - and no trojans or malwares got into it, lol

    • @soupdragon151
      @soupdragon151 10 днів тому +1

      Remember those days even the venerable Internet Explorer 6 used to acquire toolbars like turds on your shoe just from accessing the 'net

    • @justsumguy2u
      @justsumguy2u 10 днів тому

      @@soupdragon151 Yeah, internet explorer was terrible

  • @danhatman3538
    @danhatman3538 20 днів тому +22

    Good video, I just discovered this channel. Something about it makes me think it will take off if you keep uploading consistently. Stay on the grind

  • @chrisakaschulbus4903
    @chrisakaschulbus4903 10 днів тому +6

    "Have you ever wondered if it's true you can instantly get malware? In this video we discover how dangerous XP really is."
    I can see why many are displeased with the video... since even the description doesn't really tell you what is up. The title as well completely leaves out the "worst case, intended risk scenario".
    I know it was mentioned in the video... but it's easy to miss. Kinda proven in my eyes because many seem to explain it in the comments as well.

    • @bernds6587
      @bernds6587 7 днів тому +3

      what's funny, he most certainly installed worms manually by himself. Look at 2:50 at the taskbar....

    • @dubbyplays
      @dubbyplays 5 днів тому

      ​@@bernds6587 that's a really big ratio

  • @Beni_777
    @Beni_777 19 днів тому +97

    Why is this surprising at all? Probably the same thing would happen with any modern OS without firewall, and connected directly to the internet without router/gateway.

    • @doicenti9033
      @doicenti9033 19 днів тому +10

      I'm running Windows 10 Pro 22H2 with all updates, Windows Defender completely disabled (MsMpEng.exe), firewall on, PC running 24/7 for years, no issues. Have no antivirus running.

    • @volvo09
      @volvo09 19 днів тому +71

      ​@@doicenti9033 you are likely behind a router.

    • @lucsoft
      @lucsoft 19 днів тому +11

      No? Like a Linux Server is completely fine being directly attached to the internet. Windows XP has RCE as a feature so what can you expect.

    • @Beni_777
      @Beni_777 19 днів тому +28

      @@doicenti9033 You have the firewall running and most likely behind a router, what doesn't translate most ports to your PC. So in this case your computer's setup is way different than the XP shown in the video.

    • @Beni_777
      @Beni_777 19 днів тому

      @@lucsoft Sure is fine, because most ports and services are closed in the WAN direction. Hopefully the SSH moved from the default port too! :D

  • @TheDarq0n
    @TheDarq0n 13 днів тому +8

    but you literally turned off the Windows Firewall. So dumb lololol

  • @fiecylick3981
    @fiecylick3981 19 днів тому +15

    I know for Malwarebytes has scan rootkits disabled by default in their settings. So it seems as why Malwarebytes is not detecting the actual problems causing all of that to run at startup. I guess for the rootkit case it doesn't want to uninstall a "rootkit" that isn't one or some crazy bizarre anti-cheat that accesses Dom 0.

    • @Timic83tc
      @Timic83tc 13 днів тому

      I noticed this recently, why isn't it on my default.

  • @progamer3000-uz7pj
    @progamer3000-uz7pj 8 днів тому +8

    well, the title is a bit missleading: you are not just connecting it to the internet but rather exposing it to the internet. if you would do this without a public ip (wich is normally the case btw.) nothing really would happen. there would only be a risk if a pc on the same network would have it's own public ip.

    • @xpt
      @xpt 8 днів тому +11

      look at 2:50 on the task bar he downloaded a worm and infected the system manually

    • @scrung
      @scrung 6 днів тому

      how do you use the internet without a public ip

  • @MrSofazocker
    @MrSofazocker 7 днів тому +3

    people miss the point... dude doesn't even have set a password for the user...
    its like setting up a printer in your own network, anyone can print, open the ports to the internet, now anyone on the internet can print with your printer lmao.
    here anyone can login to his computer and install whatever they want... what 's the point of this exercise?

  • @martymcfake
    @martymcfake 17 днів тому +9

    Pay attention people. He says he Purposely set up the network to bypass safety features, These same bypasses will allow your windows 11 pc to blow up in the same/similar fashion. I still have an XP computer I use daily. Totally safe and fine and been up and running stabile for years. What I personally would find amusing is if this Streamer didn't run this VM sanboxed and it actually has access to his network. oooops.

  • @HappyHeartsPlayhouse
    @HappyHeartsPlayhouse 7 днів тому +4

    Open all ports, turn off the firewall, use no router and browser around on suspicion websites. What normal user does that? Try Win 11 and you will have the same result.

    • @Alethila
      @Alethila 13 годин тому

      Don't forget injecting the VM with malware around 2:50

  • @KittyCatYT
    @KittyCatYT 20 днів тому +117

    windows 95 sounds like fun

    • @frankbucciantini388
      @frankbucciantini388 18 днів тому +1

      And Windows98SE would also be interesting. :)

    • @firstnamerequiredlastnameo3473
      @firstnamerequiredlastnameo3473 9 днів тому

      What is a real trip is starting with MS DOS, then Windows 3.1, Win 95, Win98, Win98SE, XP, Win7, and so on. Install sequentially on the same box and watch the evolution of the screens and options.
      Remember the whole world came up the mountain through this path.
      Win3.11 (networking) was my first encounter with Windows being used commercially. It crashed every now and then but could be rebooted very quickly. You can still find this old stuff around.
      DOS installed from three diskettes.
      Windows 95 installed from 11 diskettes.
      Then the growing software came out on CD.

  • @elrontur
    @elrontur 19 днів тому +49

    Why do you download something from Uptodown in the first place? This place is riddled with infected software. My bare metal XP machine is on the internet today and fine by knowing what I do and how I browse and only download from genuine sources.

    • @nikostalk5730
      @nikostalk5730 16 днів тому +3

      uptodown is not so danger, just be careful about download links, mate!

    • @Likemea
      @Likemea 16 днів тому

      bruh

    • @davidvanderklauw
      @davidvanderklauw 15 днів тому

      What is the best browser for Windows XP these days?

    • @nikostalk5730
      @nikostalk5730 15 днів тому

      @@davidvanderklauw this is not about "best" this is only about "it will work, for most times".
      Google Chrome 49.0
      Firefox 52
      Maybe yandex.browser (Russian fork of Chrome) will work
      Opera 12.18 will work but for very basic things, and it works FAST. And supports FTP (wow)
      Some users used Brave or Dolphin or even UC but i can't trust these chinese things

    • @elrontur
      @elrontur 15 днів тому

      @@davidvanderklauw Supermium (based on Chrome) and Mypal 68 (based on Firefox) are pretty good and well known for use on XP.

  • @unknown-qf4pc
    @unknown-qf4pc 16 днів тому +7

    i really like the video is really, really interesting, i never thought about what happend if you connect XP to the internet, the malware in those days is crazy, that's why i love watching this type of videos, keep it up!

  • @bladerj
    @bladerj 11 днів тому +3

    because we all know windows XP came with mozilla firefox pre installed.......

  • @kamild_
    @kamild_ 8 днів тому +2

    I still have some memories regarding connecting unprotected XP to the internet. I think I was about 12-13 years old at the time, and I was trying to get my cousin's computer fixed. So I decided to do what I knew best, which is reinstall Windows - but the only disc I had on hand was a SP-less Windows XP, so I used that. It took *seconds* after connecting to the internet, the desktop was already filled with all sorts of shortcuts and the entire computer froze like a minute later. Pretty sure some of these icons lead straight to prn, or they pretended to (now that I think about it, some of these shortcut icons might have been my first exposure to this kind of content...).
    I panicked and told my cousin to call a proper IT guy to get it done 😶

  • @xpower7125
    @xpower7125 6 днів тому +3

    on SP3 firewall is on by default so it would be kinda unrealistic (and also very stupid) to run XP with these settings

  • @Kurisu-SanYT
    @Kurisu-SanYT 12 днів тому +22

    Whos here bc of mutahar?

    • @Creeperfun12
      @Creeperfun12 12 днів тому

      No i just like eric, didnt know muta made a video on him

    • @Kurisu-SanYT
      @Kurisu-SanYT 11 днів тому

      ​@@Creeperfun12k

    • @xslite300
      @xslite300 10 днів тому

      ​@@Creeperfun12yapper

    • @prohax1
      @prohax1 7 днів тому

      ur yapping​@@xslite300

  • @davidcadieu9238
    @davidcadieu9238 15 днів тому +14

    Now I want to see what would happen if you connected Windows millennium edition to the internet.
    God I'm old.

    • @MoneyatMidnight
      @MoneyatMidnight 13 днів тому +4

      It would probably crash before you even got started good 😅

  • @FlakeEatsStairs
    @FlakeEatsStairs 17 днів тому +7

    i just realized this was uploaded on my birthday lmfao, good video, i actually always wondered what happened what would happen if you were to do something like this

  • @techactivate781
    @techactivate781 6 днів тому +8

    Can you explain the IE tab open at 2:53?

    • @buttbutt4886
      @buttbutt4886 6 днів тому

      Why that is a forceful malware install

  • @user-xi2om4hf1c
    @user-xi2om4hf1c 19 днів тому +20

    tbh, even windows10/11 wont last as long without firewalls too

    • @namesand506
      @namesand506 5 днів тому

      Windows xp survived a lot longer than any pc made before 2020

  • @christianasmanis5725
    @christianasmanis5725 13 днів тому +3

    Try again with activated Windows Firewall

  • @_RUSSIA
    @_RUSSIA 8 днів тому +2

    There are no viruses and trojans on my Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 with security updates for 2019. The computer is constantly connected to the Internet.

  • @IVEdge
    @IVEdge 4 дні тому +1

    Best demonstration of why they’re called “viruses”
    This should be mandatory viewing in security/networking classes.

  • @tuber2kh
    @tuber2kh 19 днів тому +83

    You must be young. The router wasn't popularized post-XP. Everyone I knew, throughout the entire lifespan of XP had a router between their home PCs and the Internet. Even when doing repairs and upgrades for non-technical friends/family members, every time I found a PC connected directly to a modern and thought it would be right on internet, it turned out the provider's box was functioning as a modem+router, not just a simple modem. I've never once seen a computer connected directly to the net, exposing all ports. I personally would assume a modern PC with a modern version of Windows would be infected just as easily if connected directly. Albeit probably not quite so quickly perhaps.

    • @Knaeckebrotsaege
      @Knaeckebrotsaege 19 днів тому +31

      Bingo. The only thing he's demonstrating with this video is excellent clickbait skills for something that doesn't happen in the real world: not being behind *any* sort of router acting as a firewall

    • @juniorsilvabroadcast
      @juniorsilvabroadcast 19 днів тому +4

      a modern OS Firewall is way more efficient than old windows xp.

    • @markasiala6355
      @markasiala6355 19 днів тому +2

      The direct to modem era was more so if you had dial-up internet which was still popular when XP came out. I cannot recall for sure if my ADSL modem around 2001 had a router, it was different than the ones of today I know that. It also had a pause button that would disconnect you from the internet as a protection mechanism (or at least a peace of mind mechanism for those who were worried about it).
      In either case, you would still be running a Windows or Mac software-based firewall and antivirus (which he turned off). Even if you did not run an antivirus on the Mac (as too many people did not), there was still a built in firewall in Mac OS X.

    • @riseabove3082
      @riseabove3082 19 днів тому +8

      You are mostly correct but there was a period of time when ISPs were just introducing their new cable services or DSL services it was just technically a modem and nothing more. My first DSL modem was just a modem that only allowed one computer to be on the internet and the same for Cox it's first cable modem was the size of a very large cement block - it was silver made out of a giant heatsink. It too was just a cable modem only that allowed only one computer on the internet.
      I remember using special purchased software to link up additional machines to get the internet as well. This was a short period by about two or three years before aftermarket cable routers you could purchase at the store like Linksys being one the first ones that sold a router with a firewall so you could hardwire multiple computers to the internet. At first, you had to keep this on the downlow with Cox as they would not support you if you told them you had one of these. Good times.
      I'm curious also what Windows XP he used - SP1, SP2, or SP3. It makes a difference.

    • @radioflyer2030
      @radioflyer2030 19 днів тому +5

      I was the second person in my neighborhood to have cable internet back in 1998. The technician didn't even know how to do the installation & had to return the next day to finally get it working. As an engineer working in telecommunications (ATM backbone switches & the associated Unix network configuration software) at the time, I guarantee you that their modem was exactly that... a modem & nothing more. If you didn't know enough to get your own firewall / router, your PC absolutely WAS connected DIRECTLY to the Internet. It took about 4 years before they wanted to upsell me to their own router, but I'd already had one since day one, and I certainly wasn't going to pay their extortionist monthly upsell fee for an objectively bad router.

  • @Henry69981
    @Henry69981 20 днів тому +89

    this is sooo ironic. i just installed a XP ISO file lollll

    • @fox.9879
      @fox.9879 19 днів тому +1

      if you install it get avast for it cause its free and using it a have my xp PC on the internet and haven't got a virus using it yet

    • @ElvenMans
      @ElvenMans 19 днів тому +30

      ​@@fox.9879 I like the "yet" at the end

    • @fus132
      @fus132 19 днів тому +5

      @@ElvenMans There's no such thing as 100% security.

    • @shallex5744
      @shallex5744 19 днів тому +3

      you don't know what ironic means

    • @Henry69981
      @Henry69981 19 днів тому

      @@fox.9879 yea i already got avast

  • @capulcununteki
    @capulcununteki 8 днів тому +2

    I failed to get a virus by running Windows XP on Virtualbox. I don't have a chance to cancel the router, I get internet through the router with fiber optic cable. However, I saw that my router's interface has the option to activate DMZ and the ability to turn off the firewall. Even though I applied all these, nothing happened. Neither Win7 on my main computer was infected nor XP on the virtual machine.

  • @datajake1999
    @datajake1999 19 днів тому +10

    I have some old PCs that I mess around with, and I don't connect them to the internet for this exact reason. I would hate to have the system become a target, and potentially have malware spread to other systems on the network.

    • @randomgamingin144p
      @randomgamingin144p 17 днів тому +1

      if you are worried about it spreading to other systems on the network, put a firewall behind the device in the routers settings

    • @v1be2007
      @v1be2007 13 днів тому

      if youre using a firewall the chance of getting a virus like this without going on weird websites is still very low

    • @Ramog1000
      @Ramog1000 13 днів тому

      so you worry for having a way beyond standard way to connect to the internet and disabling firewall on purpose?
      This is more like a whatif scenario than anythign else.

  • @lv.1crook
    @lv.1crook 11 днів тому +8

    wow, so u ran a system with no security measures and it got infected by viruses xdd

    • @bernds6587
      @bernds6587 7 днів тому +6

      no, even better: 2:50 look at the taskbar. He infected it willingly and deliberately

  • @mystixa
    @mystixa 19 днів тому +51

    This absolutely contrived and runs XP in a way that makes it worse than it is even on its own. Yea if you remove all safetiess from any version of windows and expose it to the internet without and standard safeties you'll cause yourself trouble. Hate to inform you but people ran routers and firewalls back in the XP days as well.

    • @Nono-hk3is
      @Nono-hk3is 17 днів тому +4

      True, but but it was also very common Standard Operating Procedure to disable the host firewall because it got in the way of doing certain activities, and windows firewall was so much easier to disable than to reconfigure (still is).
      It also was fairly common to have a broadband router/firewall as far back as early 2000s, but again, it was common to enable "DMZ mode" (which was a misnomer) which caused all incoming packets to be forwarded to one host on your network.
      So this scenario was not ubiquitous but is still a valid representative of a commonly seen subset of configurations, one that was typically implemented by people who were smart enough to be dangerous. The same kind of people would go onto websites similar to this one and leave negative comments on technical topics about which they didn't actually know as much as they thought they did.

    • @nikostalk5730
      @nikostalk5730 16 днів тому +2

      @@Nono-hk3is well, as a young user during XP era, i can surely say, we done a disabled firewall use, but it was like 1 to 1000
      and only to do some stupid things like to play online or share files between PCs. Then - we enable it again
      Second thing - WE USED ROUTERS. *WE USED ROUTERS!!* Even in 2004.

    • @elllieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
      @elllieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 15 днів тому +3

      the point of this isn't to show how insecure it is, just how insecure it can be

    • @iszazial7845
      @iszazial7845 15 днів тому +5

      Lol I thought the same. It's funny how he cuts out infecting the shit out of his VM and makes it seem like just being connected to the net. Clickbate

  • @JoshuaPeisach
    @JoshuaPeisach 14 днів тому

    Wow. This is so cool! I love how you investigated what was happening and tried to get the information about these obscure pieces of malware. You should try to reverse engineer these and make some write ups!

  • @MatthewCenance
    @MatthewCenance 12 днів тому +5

    Is it true that you'll be infected within 30 minutes of connecting online using Windows XP? Or is it because you're injecting some malware using the host computer?

    • @ghettochicken8420
      @ghettochicken8420 12 днів тому +3

      he got his views and the NPCs in the comment section are none the wiser

    • @MatthewCenance
      @MatthewCenance 12 днів тому +1

      @@ghettochicken8420 And also likely a few views from SomeOrdinaryGamers who found this video after watching his video.

    • @SkyenNovaA
      @SkyenNovaA 11 днів тому

      Probably if you do what this guy did and literally disable every single protection available yeah. I could give it a try and verify it myself.

    • @xpt
      @xpt 8 днів тому +3

      @@MatthewCenance look at the right side of the taskbar at 2:50 he manually infected the system after deliberately disabling all security features.

    • @austinsmith6714
      @austinsmith6714 6 днів тому

      ​@@SkyenNovaApost a video of it.

  • @JulesArchinova
    @JulesArchinova 17 днів тому +8

    2:23 XP's firewall is what prevents the machine from accepting random connections ,yet you get out of your way to disable it ...Why ? If you do the same on newer windows it will get attacked too.

    • @Ramog1000
      @Ramog1000 13 днів тому +1

      don't forget that a standard router nowerdays doesn't let most things through except you tell it to.
      But why even make a comment out of it, its clear from the start that this is only a what if scenario.

  • @ntsang.
    @ntsang. 3 дні тому +4

    2:50 "xp sp3 worm"

  • @nyanmoth
    @nyanmoth 19 днів тому +1

    I love this sort of thing! Can you run some other outdated systems, what happens if you connect MS-DOS to the open web? Are there any linux distros that are known for vulnerabilities that get attacked when they connect online too? Really enjoy your voice too, it's soothing!

  • @KyanoAng3l0
    @KyanoAng3l0 12 днів тому +2

    Wild that I find this video while setting up my childhood VM with XP, lol. I'm not too worried, but I'll be sure to keep it as secure as possible. Malware is a part of my childhood that I DON'T wanna re-experience.
    Came here from PCGamer and SomeOrdinaryGamers, btw.

  • @mcbpete
    @mcbpete 17 днів тому +4

    As you've got Security Center I'm guessing this is the Service Pack 2 edition of XP. Curious to know what'd happen if you ran the OG/unpatched release back from 2001 ? I imagine it'd just like my first week at uni when we all plugged our laptops into our room network ports: Within an hour we all got hit with Sasser and our systems would randomly restart all throughout the day 😆

  • @idahofur
    @idahofur 15 днів тому +3

    When I got back into computer a little over 15 years ago. Another tech was loading a fresh install of Windows 2000 server and it started crashing. So he asked me to come upstairs and see what it was crashing. Upon watching it load up. I noticed it did something that told me it was being infected asap. He was plugged into a network provider that was a wisp and there security they had was garbage. I put a router between the two and problem solved. Great video and I forgot about some of those tricks. The malware closing the anti-virus and other clean up tools. Machines was getting infected so fast. The place I worked at was accused more than once of doing it just to get more money. At bad caps to that. Nobody wanted a PC anymore.

  • @frand.3529
    @frand.3529 14 днів тому +2

    This video is the equivalent to the one "Checking the BMW X5 security level against thieves" in which the first instruction is, "Park it at night in dangerous área with the Windows opened"

  • @garrys_blox-on7pe
    @garrys_blox-on7pe 5 днів тому +1

    this happened because: you used Windows XP SP1 which wasn't used widely for 20 years,
    +you used IE6 which is also 20 years outdated
    +you turned off the FireWall
    +if you did all these other things on Windows 11 you will end up the same way like on Windows XP.

  • @mecha417
    @mecha417 6 днів тому +4

    2:50
    "xp sp3 wor ..." For what? Worm? As in forcibly installing one?
    "Don't recommend channel".

  • @pcsecuritychannel
    @pcsecuritychannel 19 днів тому +52

    Amazing video, was thinking of doing this at some point, looks like it's not too different from connecting windows XP to the internet in its hayday without an antivirus. In an ever changing world Windows XP provides a feeling of home for those of us who grew up with the internet before everyone was on it. :D

    • @yeltsinreyesblandon7362
      @yeltsinreyesblandon7362 18 днів тому +3

      Do it with Windows 11. I always install it with internet connection but now I´m paranoid

    • @imark7777777
      @imark7777777 18 днів тому

      @@yeltsinreyesblandon7362 I had to redo a few systems that were Windows 11… You cannot set them up without Internet connection unless you get the fancy command prompt incantation and boot sequence.

    • @randomgamingin144p
      @randomgamingin144p 17 днів тому +8

      @@yeltsinreyesblandon7362 its because in this video he opened every single port, completely disabling the firewall, similar to connecting your computer directly into the modem. on modern windows versions there is actual security in place to prevent that, but of course not on windows xp with its default settings

    • @TheawesomeMCB
      @TheawesomeMCB 15 днів тому

      Hello Leo! 😄

    • @SkyenNovaA
      @SkyenNovaA 11 днів тому

      @@yeltsinreyesblandon7362 As long as you:
      Don't disable your router's firewall
      Don't disable your PCs firewall
      Don't disable microsoft defender
      Don't run an incredibly outdated version of w11
      then you're still not safe from malware because Windows 11 itself is malware. Switch to linux if you care about avoiding malware

  • @OneBoredCatbug
    @OneBoredCatbug 10 днів тому +1

    It'd be pretty scary trying to run Windows XP unironically for a PC nowadays, when a system reaches its final updates and isn't supported anymore it's pretty easy to make something that bypasses all of its security protocols, then before you know it you're hit with every virus under the sun and your run is done.
    Hopefully Windows 11 gets massively improved or Windows 10 support never ends.

  • @shaurz
    @shaurz 7 днів тому +1

    In 2004 I installed Windows 2000 on a PC connected to my university network and it was infected with a trojan immediately. They had no filtering on the network so it was probably infected by another machine on the local network.

  • @okcupid3769
    @okcupid3769 6 днів тому +3

    No firewall and no anti virus? What is even the point of this video then. Like duh no wonder.

  • @fennecRBX
    @fennecRBX 12 днів тому +4

    You should do a video about how safe XP is on the internet... with the damn firewall turned on.

  • @Valdraya
    @Valdraya 7 днів тому +1

    if you use windows 11 you'll have a remote attacker taking screenshots of your PC from first install

  • @OGGalleryCrew92
    @OGGalleryCrew92 19 днів тому +1

    8:08 what program you running on the macbook to look stuff up and what program is it you use ?
    Could you do a video with all what you did on windows Xp on a MAC running Ventura !

    • @NoobsDeSroobs
      @NoobsDeSroobs 16 днів тому +2

      He just used a standard terminal to check.

  • @erazorDev
    @erazorDev 19 днів тому +9

    Disabled automatic updates on purpose (yes XP is EOL but who knows, if there are some updates available). Also a running FTP.exe does not imply complete control over all files. And most people in fact were behind routers when XP was introduced. This showcase is pure academic.

  • @sprint_channel
    @sprint_channel 19 днів тому +7

    Ugh... I have no idea what's going on in the video. I am in Russia and I use XP on many of my computers. I tried to specifically find and run at least one virus that will work on XP, but I didn't find anything. So, if someone connect to me and stole my data, please, I dont mind if Quake III files or GTA VC saves are stolen from me. Also, my friend from Latvia uses computers running on XP, 2000 and ME. He's never caught any malware

  • @Daniel15au
    @Daniel15au 13 днів тому +1

    The difference between now and "back in the day" is that now we have apps that can scan the entire public IPv4 address space in less than 15 minutes (see apps like masscan) so it's trivial to find systems that have vulnerable services exposed publicly.
    For the IPs at 12:31, instead of just hitting the IP in the browser, you need to look at the end of the command to get the full URL. It's downloading an MSI installer disguised as a PNG file.

  • @andreh4eva
    @andreh4eva 13 днів тому +1

    Apart from what was said in the other comment, there are also many industrial automation equipment that still run on windows xp. I work in a company that provides image processing solutions to the industry and there are projects we developed 15-20 years ago still out there running on production lines who would be perfect targets for ransomware if connected to the internet (which is quite likely since most people operating these lines have no idea about IT security). As you can imagine, companies would be more than willing to pay good bucks in order to get their lines back working as fast as possible.

  • @ManteIIo
    @ManteIIo 9 днів тому +6

    Absolutely any OS would get instantly infected without fire-wall. Still using XP and w7 as personal preference at home to this day and never had a single issue for the past 15+ years.

    • @exaq
      @exaq 9 днів тому +6

      he manually infected it, look at 2:50 in the task bar lol

    • @firstnamerequiredlastnameo3473
      @firstnamerequiredlastnameo3473 9 днів тому

      I know a person using the same combination.

    • @tomtravis858
      @tomtravis858 8 днів тому

      Linux by default has it's built-in firewall disabled.

    • @sebastiangua3230
      @sebastiangua3230 День тому

      Haven’t seen a case of Mac, iOS or Linux infection in my life.

  • @alfosisepic
    @alfosisepic 19 днів тому +55

    This is why I'm a bit worried about people complaining about Steam not being supported on their Windows versions.

    • @naotomori5974
      @naotomori5974 19 днів тому +49

      Most people using Steam on Win7 or 8.1 don't have their PC connected directly to the internet with all ports open and no firewall. Almost everyone has a router with a built-in firewall and most ports closed.

    • @brodriguez11000
      @brodriguez11000 19 днів тому

      @@naotomori5974 Well they were worried about losing access to their games. Also one needs more than just firewalls to protect a computer.

    • @shallex5744
      @shallex5744 19 днів тому +24

      those people should have the right not to have their games that they paid for taken away from them.

    • @Knaeckebrotsaege
      @Knaeckebrotsaege 19 днів тому +18

      @@shallex5744 This. So much this. A ton of my steam library (on a nearly 20 year old account) is entirely unplayable cause those games don't run on anything newer than either XP or 7, both of which can't officially run steam anymore. Add to that the fact that this is just yet another BS clickbait video with NO FIREWALL (something that doesn't happen in the real world behind any router)

    • @DustinJames-mk1gl
      @DustinJames-mk1gl 19 днів тому +3

      ​@Knaeckebrotsaege
      What games are you talking about specifically? I play a lot of retro games from the late 90s and up to like 2005
      I've never come across a game that doesn't work with windows 11. In fact, I'm currently playing the original diablo from 1997.

  • @wearesunrise
    @wearesunrise 19 днів тому +1

    This is amazing how do you not have more subs please keep up thr amazing work!

  • @BasedBenny
    @BasedBenny 18 днів тому

    Wow I check your channel after a few days and your up 3k subs? Well deserved!