Douglas DC3s were around then, and were operated same as HP42s and dodging weather in the same way, and 40 years later same DC3 types fly in the weather and conditions which no HP42 would be expected to fly in. It doesn’t mean that the HP42 was bad. It was contemporary. The single DC1, the DC2s and DC3s were extraordinarily good, throughout. As an Englishman, I’d judge the DC3 to be the best thing that US (or anyone else) ever built -to do a specific job. A pretty broad spectrum, too.
When you look at the two, you would not guess that one flew first in 1930 and the other only 5 years later. You also wouldn't guess the second one ist still active today... but since it is, it must have been the first plane to perfect a certain formula! That, or the large number built during the war simply placed them out of competition in their niche.
Tim Jones, thank you. Pleased you are enjoying it. Plenty more videos on the channel. Check them out if you haven't already. Let us know if there is anything in particular you would like to see, and we'll post it if we have it.
2 were made and never left Eueopean airspace the German air ministry looked upon the thing as a joke it was out dated not profitable overmanned 7 crew you had to maintain in flight the engines! Just having a monoplane was not a advantage. Last point if it was so go why did it no go in to production?
Germany was the undisputed leader in passenger aircraft in Europe before WW2 and still is today. British aircraft like de Haviland had appalling loss rates
@@paulgreen6980 the ju 52 simply fit better into the market back then. Japan built a few more of their g38 copy. Later, the fw200 was great, but the government had different priorities at the time.
@@WilhelmKarsten "Germany was years ahead of Britain in passenger service." What German aircraft manufacturer built more airliners than Vickers in the 1950s?"
I had'nt thought about it, but you could be onto something for short haul flights, I mean model aircraft have been using electric motors for years. Unless the engineers start develpoing aircraft designed around hydrogen fuelled engines.
@@thamesmudor, electric catapults launching unpowered suborbital capsules. Landing like a glider, or with electric motors for a safe landing approach.
Namanya perubahan butuh waktu tepat....sampai good msa mau bodoh mulu .....pokonya mafia dan penjhat itu komunitas fail tdk layak utk di gunakan pada manusia klu punya akal yah mikir ko jahat mulu kaya binatang ga punya moral....
"Cruising speed in still air was less than 100 miles per hour"
but the safety record was astonishing though, for such new technology.
The cockpit windows were Triplex safety glass, but the pax cabin had Perspex or similar.
Great film of what I presume was Croydon Airport.
I'm not surprised it had a still air cruising speed of less than 100mph. It had a built in headwind.
Douglas DC3s were around then, and were operated same as HP42s and dodging weather in the same way, and 40 years later same DC3 types fly in the weather and conditions which no HP42 would be expected to fly in. It doesn’t mean that the HP42 was bad. It was contemporary. The single DC1, the DC2s and DC3s were extraordinarily good, throughout. As an Englishman, I’d judge the DC3 to be the best thing that US (or anyone else) ever built -to do a specific job. A pretty broad spectrum, too.
When you look at the two, you would not guess that one flew first in 1930 and the other only 5 years later.
You also wouldn't guess the second one ist still active today... but since it is, it must have been the first plane to perfect a certain formula!
That, or the large number built during the war simply placed them out of competition in their niche.
Very good 👍
Wonderful material.
Tim Jones, thank you. Pleased you are enjoying it. Plenty more videos on the channel. Check them out if you haven't already. Let us know if there is anything in particular you would like to see, and we'll post it if we have it.
@@FASTAviationArchive
Will do, am working through your collection, all great.
The Vampire is a fave.
Germanys G38 was light years ahead..fours engined mono
2 were made and never left Eueopean airspace the German air ministry looked upon the thing as a joke it was out dated not profitable overmanned 7 crew you had to maintain in flight the engines! Just having a monoplane was not a advantage. Last point if it was so go why did it no go in to production?
Germany was the undisputed leader in passenger aircraft in Europe before WW2 and still is today.
British aircraft like de Haviland had appalling loss rates
@@paulgreen6980
the ju 52 simply fit better into the market back then.
Japan built a few more of their g38 copy.
Later, the fw200 was great, but the government had different priorities at the time.
Impressive track record, given the technology of the time. Background music is a bit too loud.
Germany was years ahead of Britain in passenger aircraft... still is today
@@WilhelmKarsten Is that why Lufthansa purchased the British built Viscount 800 in the 1950s?
@@WAL_DC-6B No, it's not.
@@WAL_DC-6B Please name a British company that still makes commercial passenger aircraft in the U.K.???
@@WilhelmKarsten "Germany was years ahead of Britain in passenger service." What German aircraft manufacturer built more airliners than Vickers in the 1950s?"
🇧🇷 muito bom 👍🏻
🇧🇩♥️
❤❤❤
Ryanair have a bit to learn about passenger comfort 🤣
❤
Varigud❤
joao muito bom
Someone do a new 1/72 kit please (or 1/48). Along with the super constellation it is beautiful.
❤❤👍👍👍👍👍👍👍🙏🙏
The biplane will make a comeback with electric motors.
I had'nt thought about it, but you could be onto something for short haul flights, I mean model aircraft have been using electric motors for years.
Unless the engineers start develpoing aircraft designed around hydrogen fuelled engines.
Electric motors are unlikely to replace turbines anytime soon. Synthetic fuel is probably the future of aviation.
@@thamesmudor, electric catapults launching unpowered suborbital capsules. Landing like a glider, or with electric motors for a safe landing approach.
They wave flags on top of the cockpit as similar acknowledgement to the sea ships. 😂
Imperial airways is civil company but it seems that personal wears RAF's uniform could anybody explain?
Tempat gagak hanya di lab bukan di lapangan pada umat manusia ....di lab jadi udh proporsional di porsinya usahakan di sana
Namanya perubahan butuh waktu tepat....sampai good msa mau bodoh mulu .....pokonya mafia dan penjhat itu komunitas fail tdk layak utk di gunakan pada manusia klu punya akal yah mikir ko jahat mulu kaya binatang ga punya moral....