The essence of alternative history is that it doesn’t necessarily have to be realistic - it is precisely meant to imagine possible, but unrealized scenarios. For example, during World War II, many people believed the Germans had no chance against France, yet they defeated it in just a few weeks. This shows that history can sometimes take unexpected and unlikely turns, and that alternative scenarios allow us to explore what could have happened if events had unfolded differently. It's a creative exercise, not an exact reconstruction of history. Additionally, keep in mind that there could have been secret missions, such as an agreement between the U.S. and Spain for Spain to withdraw from the Axis alliance and allow U.S. ships to pass through and land troops in North Africa (Algeria). Alternative scenarios give us the chance to consider such possible events, which might not be fully addressed or explored in this video. So please refrain from commenting on the unrealistic aspects, as how do you know whether this could have happened or not? Thank you and enjoy the video!
Technically, almost everything in this video is unrealistic because it didn't happen, but it could have happened because we don't know what could have happened and what didn't.Thanks for the comment!
Союзникам допомогло повстання Ряданського Союза. Вони з двох боків душили Германію ,але в певний момент видохлись для великих наступів й підписали мир ,де Ось достаточно сильна.
This is a high quality video although with some unrealistic things, but anyway. 1 How strong is Germany in cold war? 2 How Himmler will led Germany? 3 Will be there space race?
1. Brutally powerful, easily surpassing USSR and a close US rival in everything 2. Slavery, esoteric nazism with an extreme focus on racial purity, totalitarian control over every aspect of daily life and ultra militarism. Google Burgundian system to understand it better. 3. OFC, why wouldn’t it be?
Could have never feasibly happened, but interesting to watch Adressing the comment by the author: Yes, the people of the time didn't expect France to lose, but looking at it retrospectively with the modern knowledge, it's obvious that their defeat was certain and predetermined. Britain on the other hand, again looking retrospectively, was nearly unconquerable (in short term at least, and the time to starve them down Hitler did not have)
I understand, but what if the Germans had devoted more resources and time to air and naval forces before the war? What if the entire British army had been destroyed at Dunkirk? There are various scenarios and possibilities that we don't know about, and maybe it would have worked out? But anyway, thanks for the comment and your opinion!
@@Worldball_mapping Yeah, I am open to historical discussions on these themes, and about how potentially realistic they are. About the Navy and Air: if they devoted more resources to Air and Navy (before WW2 began), they'd have to take them away from the land army, potentially (and likely) ruining Blitzkrieg (due to a lack of armored vehicles to carry out the Blitz operations.) If however they devoted more resources to it after France fell, well... They already did, and tried bombing Britain into the ground and tried to blockade them, however both failed because A) Britain was much more capable of replenishing their airforce B) Britain just had a better and bigger naval fleet, and it innovated on that fleet throughout the war, rendering the UBoats ineffective. About the fall of Dunkirk. Yes, it maybe could've happened, if Germans were more lucky. However the problem is not the event happening, but its consequences. Britain at the time of Dunkirk had its war cabinet composed of pro-war politicians. The only one standing out was Lord Halifax, and even he just wanted to see what Germans would offer in peace (and likely reject it)
@@qinjiwei5058 I have read many historical books about World War II and am very knowledgeable on this topic. While I agree that Churchill categoricaly rejected any negotiations with Germany, your claim that Britain still had "enough divisions" to defend itself even if the army at Dunkirk had been destroyed or captured is unfounded. Dunkirk was critically important not only for saving troops but also for maintaining Britain’s military capabilities. Around 338,000 British and Allied troops were evacuated from Dunkirk, forming the backbone of Britain’s most experienced and battle-hardened forces. If these forces had been lost, Britain would have been left almost entirely without a professional army, as the reserves consisted mostly of poorly trained and inexperienced divisions. At that time, Britain’s defensive structure was extremely weak. Most of the equipment left behind at Dunkirk (around 2,500 artillery, 84,000 vehicles, 20,000 motorcycles, and nearly all heavy weapons) was lost. This meant that even the remaining divisions were severely under-equipped for effective combat. Without the forces rescued at Dunkirk, Britain would have had to rely on just a few fully formed units, which would not have been sufficient for proper defense. It’s also important to mention that the German invasion plan (“Operation Sea Lion”) was a real threat. If the Germans had gained air superiority over the English Channel (which they aimed to achieve during the Battle of Britain), they could have prepared an invasion, as the Royal Navy would not have been able to operate effectively without air support. Without the troops rescued from Dunkirk, defending against such an invasion would have been nearly impossible. Therefore, to say that Britain could still defend itself even after losing the army at Dunkirk is incorrect. The destruction of the British Expeditionary Force would have left the country with unprepared and poorly equipped divisions, incapable of repelling a German invasion. Under such circumstances, Britain’s survival would have depended solely on German strategic mistakes or unexpected Allied intervention, rather than the strength of Britain’s remaining forces. Thanks
This video: Germany conquers Britain. Royal Navy: clearly someone forgot i existed The Germans could absolutely under no circumstances invade Britain the Kreigsmarine was an absolute joke way too small.
@@MCLegend13 The Germans devoted a lot of resources to the naval forces before the war, the Germans won the air battle against Britain, and without air support, the Royal Navy is no longer so powerful . Thanks for comment anyways
@@Worldball_mapping and thanks for the reply. But no the British had more industrial complex and air bases up north, out of. The Luftwaffes range and a common Misconception is that The Luftwaffe vastly outnumbered the RAF where in bombers they did out number them but the RAF at many points of the battle had superior numbers of Fighters. Also Germanys Maritime infrastructure was still devastated after the Treaty of Versailles that’s one aspect of the treaty that the British maintained surprisingly well. Germany has at best 3 yards to work on where as the British have 11, and if you push it as many as 15 yards to work with, Germany doesn’t have the same resources as Britain due to the empire, Britain also has industrial basis in Canada and Australia adding it all together The Entire British Empire has got almost as many naval yards as America. And all that put together means no matter how much Germany builds Britain would build at least 3 to 5 times more. At best Opperation Sea Lion would allow Germany to capture most of the south coast and maybe a few city’s further inland but once the RAF from further north and the main Home fleet of the Royal Navy destroys the invasion fleet and blocks the re supply it’s over for the Germans. I’m sorry but people severely overestimate the Germans but they really are not as good as many claim them to be and they have just as many issues as the French do in some ways. Still an interesting video.
Very good video my friend! It was some time since we talked. You're an awesome mapper just like me. Mappers like us shape the community and I am glad that we still know each other! Greetings from Romania my friend! 🇷🇴🔥🇱🇹
"As a rule, pindos will never give up the opportunity to flatter themselves" Since 1942, the USSR's industry has been more powerful than any other country in the world, they simply didn't needed any lendlease allies could provide. The only thing Stalin was asking is opening the second front
Yes, but all sides decided not to fight after Hitler's death because there were no more resources, money, human resources, morale, the countries were all completely exhausted. But thanks for the comment
Does in this Timeline Nazi Germany Reconize their Genocides and tries to build memorials or no is again the hope.of the Aryan Race expansion ? @@Worldball_mapping
after so many won battles and allies, the germans wouldve been unstoppable. The soviets wouldnt have a chance to coup. The german garrison is too harsh. I understand its unrealistic, but lets be real.
@@Worldball_mapping Reichskommissariat Belgien-Nordfrankreich, Reichskommissariat, bulgarian borders, the division of yugoslavia,Bezirk Bialystok, Romanian Transnistria, the ethnic division of borders between switzerland and italy, hungarian carpathia ruthenia, italy wouldve annexed Corsica, puppet algeria, egypt, greece
Reasons for the successful offensive: 1. Small concentration of German forces in North Africa (mostly Italian) 2. Spanish-US joint agreement on Spain's withdrawal from the Axis, and later joining the Allies, the passage of US and Allied ships through the Strait of Gibraltar. This agreement recognized the territories occupied by Spain and promised economic aid. 3. The US war machine was focused on the European war and had been preparing for war since 1939, because the Japanese had not declared war on the US (I did not show this in this video because it is a European video) 4. And finally, resources, the US has a lot of them, especially with help from India, Australia, Brazil, Indonesia and more, they had a lot of resources for the war. But thank you for watching.
The US has enormous resources, especially with the help of the Allies, they have been preparing for war since 1939, they did not go to war with the Japanese
The essence of alternative history is that it doesn’t necessarily have to be realistic - it is precisely meant to imagine possible, but unrealized scenarios. For example, during World War II, many people believed the Germans had no chance against France, yet they defeated it in just a few weeks. This shows that history can sometimes take unexpected and unlikely turns, and that alternative scenarios allow us to explore what could have happened if events had unfolded differently. It's a creative exercise, not an exact reconstruction of history. Additionally, keep in mind that there could have been secret missions, such as an agreement between the U.S. and Spain for Spain to withdraw from the Axis alliance and allow U.S. ships to pass through and land troops in North Africa (Algeria). Alternative scenarios give us the chance to consider such possible events, which might not be fully addressed or explored in this video.
So please refrain from commenting on the unrealistic aspects, as how do you know whether this could have happened or not? Thank you and enjoy the video!
Apparently the history has been changed so much that 1942 happens twice in this timeline.
Unrealistic but still interesting
We share the same opinion it seems.
I mean it's a alternative history 🧠
Technically, almost everything in this video is unrealistic because it didn't happen, but it could have happened because we don't know what could have happened and what didn't.Thanks for the comment!
None of this could've happened 😂 laughable you would say it could @@Worldball_mapping
@@edseifert4610 called alternative history for a reason
The fact that the allies still won even though germany had entire europe is just crazy💀💀
When you got the rest of the world against you is not that hard to lose
There letters: U.S.A.
Germany won in a 1939 perspective
Союзникам допомогло повстання Ряданського Союза. Вони з двох боків душили Германію ,але в певний момент видохлись для великих наступів й підписали мир ,де Ось достаточно сильна.
Italy in final: My colonies!
Você aqui!
Fiquei com pena da Itália kkk
@@Paraíbano_Mapping_e_GeografiaAinda bem que tu respondeu, quase gastei meu inglês (Que já é ruim)
The map animation is amazing
Congratulations
Nice video! But I suggest you make the puppets brighter than the Reichkommisariats, or make the Reichkommisariats darker
I would really like to see a Part 4 because it would be really interesting how this would continue
Turkey just watching the sinema
Turkey 🤝 Switzerland
This is a high quality video although with some unrealistic things, but anyway.
1 How strong is Germany in cold war?
2 How Himmler will led Germany?
3 Will be there space race?
1. Brutally powerful, easily surpassing USSR and a close US rival in everything
2. Slavery, esoteric nazism with an extreme focus on racial purity, totalitarian control over every aspect of daily life and ultra militarism. Google Burgundian system to understand it better.
3. OFC, why wouldn’t it be?
7:28 ngl the speech fits well with the music 🔥
still waiting for IV part!
This is good 🎉🎉
Could have never feasibly happened, but interesting to watch
Adressing the comment by the author: Yes, the people of the time didn't expect France to lose, but looking at it retrospectively with the modern knowledge, it's obvious that their defeat was certain and predetermined. Britain on the other hand, again looking retrospectively, was nearly unconquerable (in short term at least, and the time to starve them down Hitler did not have)
I understand, but what if the Germans had devoted more resources and time to air and naval forces before the war? What if the entire British army had been destroyed at Dunkirk? There are various scenarios and possibilities that we don't know about, and maybe it would have worked out? But anyway, thanks for the comment and your opinion!
Thank you for your support!
@@Worldball_mapping Yeah, I am open to historical discussions on these themes, and about how potentially realistic they are.
About the Navy and Air: if they devoted more resources to Air and Navy (before WW2 began), they'd have to take them away from the land army, potentially (and likely) ruining Blitzkrieg (due to a lack of armored vehicles to carry out the Blitz operations.)
If however they devoted more resources to it after France fell, well... They already did, and tried bombing Britain into the ground and tried to blockade them, however both failed because A) Britain was much more capable of replenishing their airforce B) Britain just had a better and bigger naval fleet, and it innovated on that fleet throughout the war, rendering the UBoats ineffective.
About the fall of Dunkirk. Yes, it maybe could've happened, if Germans were more lucky. However the problem is not the event happening, but its consequences. Britain at the time of Dunkirk had its war cabinet composed of pro-war politicians. The only one standing out was Lord Halifax, and even he just wanted to see what Germans would offer in peace (and likely reject it)
@@remixgameyt1172 I respect your opinion, thank you.
@@qinjiwei5058
I have read many historical books about World War II and am very knowledgeable on this topic. While I agree that Churchill categoricaly rejected any negotiations with Germany, your claim that Britain still had "enough divisions" to defend itself even if the army at Dunkirk had been destroyed or captured is unfounded.
Dunkirk was critically important not only for saving troops but also for maintaining Britain’s military capabilities. Around 338,000 British and Allied troops were evacuated from Dunkirk, forming the backbone of Britain’s most experienced and battle-hardened forces. If these forces had been lost, Britain would have been left almost entirely without a professional army, as the reserves consisted mostly of poorly trained and inexperienced divisions.
At that time, Britain’s defensive structure was extremely weak. Most of the equipment left behind at Dunkirk (around 2,500 artillery, 84,000 vehicles, 20,000 motorcycles, and nearly all heavy weapons) was lost. This meant that even the remaining divisions were severely under-equipped for effective combat. Without the forces rescued at Dunkirk, Britain would have had to rely on just a few fully formed units, which would not have been sufficient for proper defense.
It’s also important to mention that the German invasion plan (“Operation Sea Lion”) was a real threat. If the Germans had gained air superiority over the English Channel (which they aimed to achieve during the Battle of Britain), they could have prepared an invasion, as the Royal Navy would not have been able to operate effectively without air support. Without the troops rescued from Dunkirk, defending against such an invasion would have been nearly impossible.
Therefore, to say that Britain could still defend itself even after losing the army at Dunkirk is incorrect. The destruction of the British Expeditionary Force would have left the country with unprepared and poorly equipped divisions, incapable of repelling a German invasion. Under such circumstances, Britain’s survival would have depended solely on German strategic mistakes or unexpected Allied intervention, rather than the strength of Britain’s remaining forces.
Thanks
portugal:DONT LEAVE ME HERE!
This video: Germany conquers Britain.
Royal Navy: clearly someone forgot i existed
The Germans could absolutely under no circumstances invade Britain the Kreigsmarine was an absolute joke way too small.
@@MCLegend13 The Germans devoted a lot of resources to the naval forces before the war, the Germans won the air battle against Britain, and without air support, the Royal Navy is no longer so powerful .
Thanks for comment anyways
@@Worldball_mapping and thanks for the reply.
But no the British had more industrial complex and air bases up north, out of. The Luftwaffes range and a common Misconception is that The Luftwaffe vastly outnumbered the RAF where in bombers they did out number them but the RAF at many points of the battle had superior numbers of Fighters.
Also Germanys Maritime infrastructure was still devastated after the Treaty of Versailles that’s one aspect of the treaty that the British maintained surprisingly well.
Germany has at best 3 yards to work on where as the British have 11, and if you push it as many as 15 yards to work with, Germany doesn’t have the same resources as Britain due to the empire, Britain also has industrial basis in Canada and Australia adding it all together The Entire British Empire has got almost as many naval yards as America.
And all that put together means no matter how much Germany builds Britain would build at least 3 to 5 times more.
At best Opperation Sea Lion would allow Germany to capture most of the south coast and maybe a few city’s further inland but once the RAF from further north and the main Home fleet of the Royal Navy destroys the invasion fleet and blocks the re supply it’s over for the Germans.
I’m sorry but people severely overestimate the Germans but they really are not as good as many claim them to be and they have just as many issues as the French do in some ways.
Still an interesting video.
@@MCLegend13 agree with you, plus the Germans knew in advance that their Reich won't last Longer
I know it takes a lot of time and effort to make mapping videos, especially ones this good so thank you for making this
Very good video my friend! It was some time since we talked.
You're an awesome mapper just like me. Mappers like us shape the community and I am glad that we still know each other! Greetings from Romania my friend! 🇷🇴🔥🇱🇹
Thank you!
Luftwaffe crushes the RAF… yeah right :D
Non historical mod be like
This is good. +1 subscriber now :D (that's all im saying so ye)
A world where the USSR is without lend lease
"As a rule, pindos will never give up the opportunity to flatter themselves"
Since 1942, the USSR's industry has been more powerful than any other country in the world, they simply didn't needed any lendlease allies could provide. The only thing Stalin was asking is opening the second front
@@ZOV_kakashkeVirus42"don't needed" for sure
@@ukasz-ss2jy ""don't needed" for sure" for sure
@ average Z ombie russian
The history is very interesant, but as the allies crossed from the Atlantic to the Mediterranean if it was defended
При разгроме Британии и СССР США не смогли бы победить без масштабной ядерной бомбардировки
the peace is crazy, the germans were losing on all fronts and still got land
Yes, but all sides decided not to fight after Hitler's death because there were no more resources, money, human resources, morale, the countries were all completely exhausted. But thanks for the comment
Does in this Timeline Nazi Germany Reconize their Genocides and tries to build memorials or no is again the hope.of the Aryan Race expansion ? @@Worldball_mapping
❤❤😂🎉🎉😢😢😮😅😊😊
Definitely unique from other scenarios.
Thanks!
awesome
What if soviet Union had civil wars in 1990
Saudi Arabia did not even enter the WW2 and Cold War
Saudi Arabia will join in the next episode, thanks for the comment!
What website do you use to do your mapping? On this specific style, I'll recommend my friends your channel too.
make the terminator scenario.
Himmler and peace ?
Yes and what?
@@Worldball_mapping Well...
@@Gaffal-md5xs well...?
@@Gaffal-md5xsHe tried to negotiate with the Allies actually, behind Hitler's back.
11:55 makes no sense for USSR to give Odessa up. Would make sense to just restore the old border there
Yes, but after the peace treaty it was agreed that the Soviet Union would not receive Odessa
By the way it is an alternative world, so it could have happened a lot of things
after so many won battles and allies, the germans wouldve been unstoppable. The soviets wouldnt have a chance to coup. The german garrison is too harsh. I understand its unrealistic, but lets be real.
Y'all this is alternate it doesn't have to be realistic in this timeline
There a making colourfull world into black and grey 😅
italian mapper tutorials having a field day but very good video
Thanks, by the way, I didn't watch his tutorial, here is one of the most basic map styles without any details
@@Worldball_mapping oh lol i thought you did this is a very well put together video then
Is that a TNO reference?
Ojala... Esa eficiencia se hubiera usdo para hacer el bien...
There will be part 4?
@@RomeoGarboMC yes
What programe do u use?
@@Ferno-k7o paint.net
@Worldball_mapping i mean all programs i wanna make a make like you not just animation if there is a tutorial send link pleasee
@Ferno-k7o ua-cam.com/video/IotvQtFL56E/v-deo.htmlsi=rfBczsoNpJa6Vuqq
История нелюби сослагательного наклонение
USSR would be able to push
If ussr fell they wouldn’t come back USA also wouldn’t be able to land in uk bruh
First like and comment❤
2nd*
W
Italian mapper Style?
What is the song you used and 5:31 Since 8:00
all music and speeches are in the description
In The description only Appears hit man
@@lorenamedina2022 ЖЕСТЬ!!! САМАЯ МОЩНАЯ И ЖЕСТКАЯ ВОЕННАЯ МУЗЫКА!!! (song)
Thank you
Nice but the german reich borders not terrible in quality, but rather, terribly innacurate
Thanks. And in which year do the German borders seem inaccurate?
@@Worldball_mapping Reichskommissariat Belgien-Nordfrankreich, Reichskommissariat, bulgarian borders, the division of yugoslavia,Bezirk Bialystok, Romanian Transnistria, the ethnic division of borders between switzerland and italy, hungarian carpathia ruthenia, italy wouldve annexed Corsica, puppet algeria, egypt, greece
How did USA manage to invade North Africa ?
one word "Oil"
Thats probably the most unrealistic part of the video tbh
Reasons for the successful offensive:
1. Small concentration of German forces in North Africa (mostly Italian)
2. Spanish-US joint agreement on Spain's withdrawal from the Axis, and later joining the Allies, the passage of US and Allied ships through the Strait of Gibraltar. This agreement recognized the territories occupied by Spain and promised economic aid.
3. The US war machine was focused on the European war and had been preparing for war since 1939, because the Japanese had not declared war on the US (I did not show this in this video because it is a European video)
4. And finally, resources, the US has a lot of them, especially with help from India, Australia, Brazil, Indonesia and more, they had a lot of resources for the war.
But thank you for watching.
4:33 ta Szwajcaria
10th like 4th comment and 1 hour ago im late
first
Usa very Overethed
The US has enormous resources, especially with the help of the Allies, they have been preparing for war since 1939, they did not go to war with the Japanese