Gamilat’s death is that one where you’re relieved it’s over but you’re not satisfied or happy that it took place. He wasn’t even an enemy, just a severely misguided ally, and he even realized that upon death. Heck, he pretty much said to Bayek, “Don’t let there be another me, because look what happened.”
@@alexmercer5414 in the first game there are these things called animus glitches. When tbey pop up you press a button and you can see yhe confession from a new perspective. Bayek is actually kneeling as they bleed out on the ground. There are not actually giant Assassins standing behind him. Layla is using his dna to view his memories so we are viewing the physical manifestation of his emotions as he eliminates a target. That's why when he killed Flavius Khemu appeared. It wasn't Khemu's ghost. It was his trauma.
@@raiden6428 good theory. This means that in the Ubisoft universe any person could have this conffesions rooms when an asesination is succes with a "emotional vincle" in the middle.
Well, I mean Odyssey is centuries before the Assassins/Hidden Ones, and Alexios/Kassandra is a mercenary with no real morals, so technically it's fair game.
I just got a theory: the reason bayek can't send these people to the duat, is because they're souls are already being taken by whatever's in the "curse of the Pharaohs". At 1:40 pthamos says the shards of the star elude us, the shards of the star are things that can be collected in the curse of the Pharaohs DLC, so they are investigating these, so their souls must already be resurrecting from whatever's in the "curse of the Pharaohs"
The curse of the pharaohs was an illusion conjured by Isidora using the Apple of Eden. None of it was real. The Apple conjures what the wielder wants to see. This was explained in Altair's codex in Assassin's Creed 2.
he is the great prove white always cant be white and black always cant be black but glad connor restored brotherhood's honour,he has second best/the best is ezio's)
Lol yeah. Even though he was the one who caused the first bit of chaos by not being careful with the relic in that city... also let’s ignore the Templar’s who unlike the assassins targeted and killed many innocent lives simply for power while the assassins killed mostly only the very Templar’s... Love how you idiots always try and make everything morally grey. Sorry but often times there is a right side of history and a baseline to morality. Assassins are on that good end far more then Templar’s are...
@@halkras far more of a darker shade then light for the Templar’s and far more of a lighter one then dark for Assassins. That’s just a fact by their principals
The order (The Order is eternal) and Bayek (May the hidden one last till the end of time) aren't wrong, neither side was capable of truly destroying the other, now the war has dragged on for two thousand years.
@@raiden6428 I know right . For the next one they better continue this not just having it with every target but having the grand spectacle of the just the awesome designs that they use it for
Just terrible crappy writing by Ubisoft. The release of Oddessy really confused gamers again as to how the order came to be because they just had to make an AC in ancient Greece.
@xMusti070 Also the fact Smenkhkare was also one of Akhenaten's sons and no doubt one of Tutankhamun's brothers. Considering Akhenaten worshipped an Apple of Eden he deems as the Aten or the Sun itself and he became obsessed with Isu stuff no doubt, it's no doubt that after Akhenaten's lost from power, Smenkhkare revived Isu obsession it with the Order of Ancients
@@lazyvoid7107 I don't know why you're questioning a two year old comment but I'll explain anyway In the main game there was an option to toggle your hood and that carried over to cutscenes, which was great and was definitely one of my favorite mechanics. In the dlcs however that option doesn't matter and you're forced to see the cutscenes with your hood down, ubisoft probably did this so you could see the facial animations better but it takes away from the experience as a whole and ruined cutscenes where you wanted to feel like an assassin
![Assassins Creed Origins: The Hidden Ones DLC Cutscenes [Full Movie]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/X6RIy1NmN94/mqdefault.jpg)
![Assassins Creed Origins: The Hidden Ones DLC Cutscenes [Full Movie]](/img/tr.png)
Gamilat’s death is that one where you’re relieved it’s over but you’re not satisfied or happy that it took place. He wasn’t even an enemy, just a severely misguided ally, and he even realized that upon death.
Heck, he pretty much said to Bayek, “Don’t let there be another me, because look what happened.”
5:24 I wish future assassins would have appeared like Altaïr, Desmond etc.
Raijin yeah like Ezio Altaïr Edward Connor Arno
Raijin and at 3:00 Templar’s like Haytham shay Charles Lee German from unity and ceaser who aya killed
@@hlinneyefc75 I did not see them
@@JustinMacri007 I meant I like I wish they were there like the other comment
I thought they may have been other assassin's we know, but wasn't sure. That's why I looked up the video
These were kind of creepy, and you can see they bugged Bayek
It's the eyes isn't?
Can someone is sweating me how these memory corridors work or is it just the Animus just dramatizing it a little bit
@@alexmercer5414 in the first game there are these things called animus glitches. When tbey pop up you press a button and you can see yhe confession from a new perspective. Bayek is actually kneeling as they bleed out on the ground. There are not actually giant Assassins standing behind him. Layla is using his dna to view his memories so we are viewing the physical manifestation of his emotions as he eliminates a target. That's why when he killed Flavius Khemu appeared. It wasn't Khemu's ghost. It was his trauma.
@@raiden6428 good theory. This means that in the Ubisoft universe any person could have this conffesions rooms when an asesination is succes with a "emotional vincle" in the middle.
@@tonitorres2857 only when viewing it through the Animus
"From this day no Hidden one will raise a sword against an innocent"
Me in AC Odyssey: 🙂
Well, I mean Odyssey is centuries before the Assassins/Hidden Ones, and Alexios/Kassandra is a mercenary with no real morals, so technically it's fair game.
@@josephpercy8772 good point
Odyssey is way before of origins like centuries ago
Yeah but still you have preset character like in the witcher but choices like skyrim
@@fouadshakur4011 so that game tells the origin of Templar's
4:57 I always get chills here. The music, the feather, and the introduction of the creed “stay your blade against an innocent”
I just got a theory: the reason bayek can't send these people to the duat, is because they're souls are already being taken by whatever's in the "curse of the Pharaohs". At 1:40 pthamos says the shards of the star elude us, the shards of the star are things that can be collected in the curse of the Pharaohs DLC, so they are investigating these, so their souls must already be resurrecting from whatever's in the "curse of the Pharaohs"
What is that void were bad guys die?
The curse of the pharaohs was an illusion conjured by Isidora using the Apple of Eden. None of it was real. The Apple conjures what the wielder wants to see. This was explained in Altair's codex in Assassin's Creed 2.
Compilation of people saying “the order is eternal”
(4:08) If you pay attention thats why Shay Cormac betrayed the Assassins that time
Yup, he understood. However, being allowed to kill civilians in gameplay after that sort of ruined that notion.
he is the great prove white always cant be white
and black always cant be black
but glad connor restored brotherhood's honour,he has second best/the best is ezio's)
Lol yeah. Even though he was the one who caused the first bit of chaos by not being careful with the relic in that city... also let’s ignore the Templar’s who unlike the assassins targeted and killed many innocent lives simply for power while the assassins killed mostly only the very Templar’s...
Love how you idiots always try and make everything morally grey. Sorry but often times there is a right side of history and a baseline to morality. Assassins are on that good end far more then Templar’s are...
@@halkras far more of a darker shade then light for the Templar’s and far more of a lighter one then dark for Assassins. That’s just a fact by their principals
@@terrencemoldern2756 SHUT UP
The order (The Order is eternal) and Bayek (May the hidden one last till the end of time) aren't wrong, neither side was capable of truly destroying the other, now the war has dragged on for two thousand years.
guys, i think the order is eternal.
yeah,abstergo agrees
The order is eternal
“No hidden one will raise a sword against an innocent” Ye um, about that... there was that one time in revelations.
And then Rogue.
I meant the first time in specific but yes
If I remember correctly, you're only allowed to punch civvies in Revelations?
@@josephpercy8772 I think he's talking about one side mission where a recruit kills an innocent and Ezio gets angry with him
@@zyxluz4645 Oh? It's been a while so I don't really remember.
In the next one I want these scenes to return and better then ever. Don't fail me
Hope you didn’t play odyssey lmao
ahmed hasan I did ,..... curiosity gets the best of everyone
Wish granted. Valhalla has these for every single order member. Even zealots. They did a fantastic job
@@raiden6428 I know right . For the next one they better continue this not just having it with every target but having the grand spectacle of the just the awesome designs that they use it for
@@gamerk1058 man i sure hope so. I always looked forward to eliminating targets bc of these dramatic debates the characters have
The way their eyes are, they look like they are possessed
Ampelius was by far the creepiest one.
Right I was like this mofo is crazy
May the the hidden one's last until the end of time...
why do they keep going the order is eternal? are they brainwashed or something?
Its the begining of the templar order
Yes
Templar
Why can’t he send them to the duat?
I dont understand, César didn't build the order of anciests. They were in Persia many years before
Just terrible crappy writing by Ubisoft. The release of Oddessy really confused gamers again as to how the order came to be because they just had to make an AC in ancient Greece.
@Journey Man So then why is Julius Caesar the Father of Understanding? Why isn't Smenkhkare?
@Journey Man Ah, I see. Thank you for clearing that up. 😊
@xMusti070 Also the fact Smenkhkare was also one of Akhenaten's sons and no doubt one of Tutankhamun's brothers. Considering Akhenaten worshipped an Apple of Eden he deems as the Aten or the Sun itself and he became obsessed with Isu stuff no doubt, it's no doubt that after Akhenaten's lost from power, Smenkhkare revived Isu obsession it with the Order of Ancients
@@TheAfghan72 You don't say. Should have never made Odyssey.
Unlike the main game, you can't have your hood on during these cutscenes, thanks Ubisoft for taking away player choice
Uh you could what are you even talking about?
@@lazyvoid7107 I don't know why you're questioning a two year old comment but I'll explain anyway
In the main game there was an option to toggle your hood and that carried over to cutscenes, which was great and was definitely one of my favorite mechanics.
In the dlcs however that option doesn't matter and you're forced to see the cutscenes with your hood down, ubisoft probably did this so you could see the facial animations better but it takes away from the experience as a whole and ruined cutscenes where you wanted to feel like an assassin
@@pedrothiagosimoes5832 Doesn't matter much
@@pedrothiagosimoes5832 you're so pissed about something so little
@@andrewlawton562 it's not little though, the hoods are what defined the franchise from the beginning