Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Artifacts In Maryland Could Rewrite Human History
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 чер 2024
- Darrin Lowery’s discovery on Parsons Island, Maryland, could revolutionize our understanding of human migration to North America. Nearly 300 artifacts, potentially dating back 22,000 years, suggest an earlier human presence than the established 13,000-year timeline. These findings challenge the notion that the first Americans crossed from Siberia to Alaska via the Bering Land Bridge, which was blocked by glaciers during that period.
The artifacts, including stone tools and knives, were dated using radiocarbon methods, yielding dates between 20,563 and 22,656 years old. However, dating artifacts is complex, especially when they’re displaced from their original context by erosion or human activity. Techniques like thermoluminescence are used for non-organic materials but can be less precise.
Lowery’s theory posits an ice-free corridor as an alternative migration route, akin to paths used by ancient animal migrations. Yet, skepticism remains among experts until his findings undergo peer review, a process that validates scientific research.
The implications of Lowery’s work are profound, potentially altering our perception of when and how the first humans arrived in North America. As the scientific community awaits further research and peer-reviewed publications, this discovery adds a significant piece to the puzzle of human history on the continent.
#maryland #artifacts #humanhistory #DarrinLowery
Parson's Island looks about 60 miles as the crow flies from my house in Virginia by the Chesapeake Bay. I found a Clovis man arrowhead on a trail near a creek leading to the Potomac River.
Incredible! What a treasure. Thank you so much for sharing with us.
It makes sense that ancient humans would have followed coastal routes rather than trek overland. They could carry much more in a boat and hunt and fish the shoreline
Also perhaps the coastal routes were on both coasts, not just the Western one. The Saluterians may have coasted along the Ice wall in the Northern Atlantic to arrive in North America.
Thank you for your comments. Absolutely it seems to be pointing in that direction as a new discoveries are being made. Are ancestry had more ingenuity than we give them credit for.
Good one. I think it is also a good theory. Indeed they could have followed the ice to see where it led them. Curious explorers just like we are today.
Why don't people think that early humans could be using boats ? ? ?
72% of the planet is water covered so figuring out boating had to have been done very early on.
$0.02
Thanks for your comment. We appreciate everyone participating in constructive conversation. To us it is not 2 cents. Thank you. You have a good point. Is not only only probable, but in our opinion, highly likely. Our ancestors were smarter and more creative than we think.
Man was making boats in it earliest days bet on that 👍..
@@easttexaspatriotsunitedsta4932 Thank you for your comments. We have no doubt about it as well.
Solutrean or some other eastern migration. It's not in the least, a stretch. Seas were lower. Routes would've been shorter, but more importantly there would've plentiful game along the way. It's time academia put aside politics and focus of the artifacts, data and critical thinking so we can begin to piece this worlds past together more accurately and honestly.
The problem is not politics its culture, the academic culture is arrogant and dismissive of the lower class (uneducated) because they are taught that they are superior as they went to college, not a loser who did not, teachers tell their students they are losers if they dont go to college, we are finding out college is the biggest scam in human history
We totally agree 👍 with you. Thanks for watching.
Boats aged 12000 years old have been found in the Mediterranean and Middle East. They are not a new phenomenon. Most of our East Coast has been under water for 10000 years and all of the geology is wet. Science worships itself and is highly ego laden. Careers are built and destroyed based on dogma, not evidence.
@LisaHarrison-et9kp Did you respond to the wrong comment or something?
In 1976 I was stationed at Ft. Lee, VA for a short period of time. On a couple of occasions I was able to look for projectile points in nearby fields. After one trip I stopped in a local burger place for lunch and I looked over what I had found, mostly flakes. A man walked up to me and asked what I had found and I told him. He sat down and opened up a knapsack to show me what he had found, mostly points of various sizes. We got to talking about finding these items and he mentioned he was of the opinion North America was settled by Europeans well before the ice sheets had melted. He stated he had found many points that were almost exact matches to what he had found in England and western France when he was stationed in that area right after WWII. He felt the same people who made those points also made the points he had found in eastern Virginia. Furthermore, he stated more Clovis points had been found along the eastern coast of the United States than have been found in the southwest part of the country. The further west one goes one finds fewer Clovis Points and that shows the native Americans in eastern Virginia migrated westward and in doing so left Clovis Points behind due to hunting and general losses. He also stated the points common in Western Europe and found in eastern Virginia are more readily found in eastern Virginia than in places further to the west. Hence, those people must have come from Europe, landed in eastern North America and then moved west. I’d love to see some research into his theory and claims.
Thank you for sharing your story. Your insight is much appreciated. We would like to add 1 thing to your comment. Their seems to be some evidence suggesting the last ice age did not cover Northeast Canada and Northeast USA. It is also highly possible the migration moved west as the ice retreated. There is also some speculation that Northward migration started further south, down into South America and moved North over time. Thanks again!
I moved to the Hampton and Newport News area last summer and I'd love to know where to look for points and other artifacts.
As far as European people being in North America during the Ice Age, I believe they could have gotten here. But I don't think there's DNA evidence in the Native Americans from before the Spanish showed up.
@@DocumentifyTV - In the early to mid-1970’s I was stationed in the Panama Canal Zone. During my time there I attended a couple of history of the area lectures. One involved two archeologists who had been conducting research along the Pacific coast of Panama and on northward. Part of their presentation included photographs to go along with their speech that covered their contention people from across the Pacific Ocean had in fact landed along these beaches several thousands of years earlier. They showed photographs of lifesaver shaped anchors on which they claimed were embossed with early Chinese characters. The characters were determined to be from a very early age, as much as twenty or thirty thousand years ago. Some in the audience suggested the boats must have broken their moorings, drifted across the Pacific and washed ashore where they were found. The archeologists said there were too many of them to be just a random washing ashore. They also discussed findings in South America, mainly in the Amazon forest, that suggested people occupied that area tens of thousands of years ago and had many cities that are now covered by jungle growth. Those people appear to have come from the Asian continent. Fast forward to today, with the help of LIDAR, we are discovering what appear to be the remains of large ‘cities’ within the Amazon jungle. I cannot wait to see what turns up next.
Tools are not a good source. Like primates that use simple universal tools, we also can make and use very similar or identical tools for the task at hand.
I think trade brought those points all the way to CA.
'Orphans in time' - that was a great line. I found this really interesting. Cheers!
Thank you for watching and commenting. Have a great day.
Clovis points found in North Central Indiana, I've found 5, 65 miles south from South Bend which sits on the divide between Indiana and Michigan. Tippecanoe River area.
Thank you for sharing with our community.
There is absolutely NO proof that the first people to live here came on a land bridge 13,000 years ago , in fact there is proof that Native Americans were here before the last Ice Age . There is some proof of trading and even relationships between an Asian Culture and Native Americans during the Ice Age and when the Land bridge was there it made these types of meetings easier . In the Ojibwe Language the end of the Ice Age was called "The Warming" and that is when The People traveled north and then west across The Continent and met other Tribes for purposes like trading and to find new food sources . Many people , especially religious groups want to believe that Natives came here on the Land Bridge , but it is just not true .
Thank you very much for your insight and comments. We agree here that much yet needs to be discovered and understood. We can learn much from our First Nations elders.
They came from all directions.
@@bernardhargraves527 certainly possible. Thank you for your comment.
Negative stereotyping-not nice.
Humanity has risen and fallen many times over countless years from natural catastrophes, climate shifts, and social collapses. Various groups and subgroups of humans have shifted all around the planet. It is folly, ignorance, and arrogance to believe that we fully know or even could know all of ancient human civilization and migrational history.
The Cerutti Mastodon site in San Diego California was dated to 130,000 years. So humans were here for much longer than thought. Also, the White Sands footprints were dated at 23,000 years.
Thank you for your comment. Much appreciated! We did some research on that topic. What we found is some researchers argue that the breakage patterns on the bones could have resulted from natural processes rather than human activity. The debate continues as more research is conducted to understand the implications of this discovery for the history of human migration. What this particular site needs is more discoveries to help support the Cerutti Mastadon site.
The old Clovis First theory via the Bering Land Bridge at this point has more holes in it than Swiss cheese. Its almost certain they came along the ice sheet, probably in boats from Asia with growing evidence of others doing the same from Europe as well as Australoid people coming across the Pacific to South America.
Agreed. The Clovis theory most certainly needs to be revisited. Newer recent findings are showing this theory to be less credible. Seems to be interest in South American migrations.
Not all peoples came from the same time and directions, nor the same routes.
Are you an expert or a time traveler? Nobody knows exactly. They could have come from the south as well, as far as South America. Lots of discoveries starting to surface.
Everybody here needs to read the book, The Farfarers".
Thanks for your comment. "The Farfarers " will be put on our list to read. Thanks for that. May we add one thing to your comment. This timeframe the book talks about is prior to the Vikings. Thanks so much.
The Cerutti Mastodon site just North East of Los Angles places inhabitants of the American Continent to 130,000 years ago.
Thank you for your comment. Check out our other video about this
ua-cam.com/video/qhZ7hmQPxik/v-deo.htmlsi=4tEojJY-7wctm_5f
The Siberians were the last wave of early colonization, crossing the Bering sea 13,000 - 14,000 years back. They were certainly not the first on the continent.
Absolutely... Thank you for your comments
I find your comments as to how proceed in analysis quite valid. It could have been a presentation on how to do such. You mentioned Lowrie, was that to justify your logic? If so then it was unnecessary, Your approach makes sense. No need to string someone up.
Thank you for your time to comment. We mention Lowrie as did other media who cover the findings. We also believe credit should be given where it is due.
Let’s look at Peru just this country alone in my mind proves people came here far before predicted and evidence would seem to suggest in South America they came by sea. 30000 to 50,000 years ago.Did you know even in Egypt they have found mummies with cocaine and tobacco in or with this preserved bodies this does not suggest anything it literally proves at very least trading with South America 5000 years ago for specific products.
Thank you very much for your comment. We think the Monte Verde site in Chile holds promise for new discoveries. Regarding your comment on Peru we did a quick Google search and found this. You might find interesting.
Ancient Egypt did not have the ability to grow plants like cocaine or tobacco. Cocaine is derived from the coca plant, and tobacco from the Nicotiana plant, both native to the Americas. They were not known in Egypt or the surrounding areas until after the voyages of Christopher Columbus. The findings of nicotine and cocaine in some Egyptian mummies are controversial and not widely accepted as evidence of pre-Columbian contact between the Old and New Worlds. The main substances used in ancient Egypt were alcohol from beer and wine, and there's some evidence suggesting the use of opium and cannabis.
Good point
Yes, people were here much earlier, people came from europe, etc... unfortunately it seems science has been hijacked by politics and people don't want to admit the history is different than currently taught!
We agree... Thanks for your comments.
I think so. This is why we should scrutinize mainstream always.
Peer review is basically people who play with prevailing wisdom to act as gatekeepers to keep out newer theories.
I unearthed some ancient dirt yesterday!
Good one 🫡
Dumb comment
We are at 19,000 to 23-27 thousand years based on varied interpretation and conjecture. 19,000 is not disputed.
Your grasp of current events has more holes than Swiss cheese.
We already know that. This video does not pertain to the oldest known timeline. This video is specifically about what has been discovered in Maryland. Watch our other video that has more focus on the timeline you are referring to. ua-cam.com/video/qhZ7hmQPxik/v-deo.htmlsi=lruOgByxx3PAf6H2
As for 27k timeline that is pushing it a bit. At the moment, the oldest known evidence of human presence in North America comes from White Sands National Park in New Mexico. Researchers have discovered footprints that have been dated to between 23,000 and 21,000 years ago.
What a dumb comment. Your interpretation of this video has nothing to do with your comment
They talk about accepted and known.
This is quite basic for the headline. Weak
Thanks 👍
LOL.. everyone is an expert, what a troll comment.
Can you say something intelligent Mr. Archeologist?
The Clovis First hypothesis died quite some time ago. Pretending that it's "the current paradigm" is just clickbaiting with BS.
@@Ge1Ri4 where did we say in this video the Clovis theory was the first?
Did I miss something? The video said nothing about Clovis first... What a dumb comment
@@DocumentifyTVin your video description "...Nearly 300 artifacts, potentially dating back 22,000 years, suggest an earlier human presence than the established 13,000-year timeline." Clovis was considered the first North American culture until it was refuted in the 1990s.
@@user-em8in9es6j you didn't read the video description before commenting. What a dumb way to not pay attention.
@@Ge1Ri4 Actually did.