There are recent examples of native people's ability to subsist on the ice pack. In the 1920s a group of hunters were stranded on the ice pack in Northern Alaska. They stayed with the ice and subsisted on seals and other animals for over 3 months before they were able to get back to shore. They had drifted over 400 miles from their village, so...they walked back and asked no one for help. They were fine.
I'm a cab driver in Fairbanks Alaska. In 1991 I picked up a gentleman from Denmark who just arrive for the Circumpolar Conference that was underway. As we talked he recounted his time having spent six years as a social worker in Greenland. He learned the Inuit language and enjoyed spending time listening to the tales told by the elders. There was one tale they recounted that would only make sense if understood as men hunting the Woolly Mammoth. How far back oral traditions may take us.
An elder from Greenland (at one of the circumpolar conferences interestingly enough) told of land that used to be forest before the glacier. That’s a collective memory from over 30,000 years ago! And those patches of land shared by the elder were the first to get exposed when the glacier started melting more quickly in the 1990s.
@@tao.of.history8366 The Bolling Allerod warm period peak was about 12,500 years ago. The next warm period before that was around 100,000 years ago. I don't know where you get a warm period around 30,000 years ago?
It seems we are learning that our ancestors were pretty darn smart. Fairly recently found evidence that humans have been in North America for way longer than originally thought and is now believed to be one of the earlier places humans lived. This is just fascinating to me
Excellent insights! Oral history gets some more respect at last! The rediscovery of Troy was not a fluke. German adventurer Heinrich Schliemann, digging with the direction of British archaeologist Frank Calvert, uncovered the many cities of Troy because they paid attention to the oral histories of the region. It is good news indeed that academic archaeology is unable to continue its a priori dismissal of the traditionally-preserved oral history of the First Nations.
James Michener says they followed whales back and forth - you might find a harpoon. One whale could feed, clothe and house a village for 2 yrs. The book is "Alaska" by James Michener.
Ice-free coasts during the ice age makes perfect sense. It takes a lot of evaporation to cause so much frozen precipitation to fall and accumulate on the continents. Much evaporation means warm oceans, so heat from the warm oceans would keep coastal lands ice-free.
During the Ice Age Alaska was warmer after the land bridge blocked the arctic/pacific warm/cold mixing. The pacific was warmer after being blocked and it kept the coastal areas much warmer than today. This is a well established, but forgotten fact. Eastern arctic and North America from Utah to the east coast pretty much was glaciated the worst.
We now know that "Alaska" and probably part of BC were not covered with ice. They used to talk about an "ice bridge", so they could get across the Bering Straight, but they now know that the ocean levels were lower then and it was a "land bridge".
Yeah I’m from BC Canada and it’s a fact! we gave it to the Americans but I mean geologically speaking it has more in common with the west cost of Canada.
There have been theories that people moved along the coast in boats. Also, during the Ice Age, there would have been more land above the sea. It makes sense.
and 8,000 years ago the islands off BC were not only connected to the mainland, but it was grassland and grizzly country and large ungulates. So to say there were no survival foods on the coast is ridiculous. Parks Canada lectures abut this site also include a bear cave excavation at the same time in the Charlottes, where a bear mandible was found that is 17 1/2 inches long. The bear would be looking in your second floor window. It's in the Victoria Museum. 2009 lecture.
@@royboate3641 That's 8000 years ago. The glaciers had receded a great deal by then. 14,000 years ago, those glaciers were near their maximum and where bears are living now and 8000 years ago, there would have been nearly a mile of ice.
@@g.e.o.r.g.e... BTW you do know that over the last few years archaeologists along the Haida Gwaii have made some remarkable finds, including footprints from 13,000 years ago alongside a fishing weir and a campfire remains. www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/ancient-bc-footprints-earliest-known-north-america-1.4599568
Do me a favour. Do an experiment. Put a known volume of water in a container and mark it’s level. Then take some of the water and freeze it and put it back in the water and recheck the level. They have been lying all along. This simple experiment will prove they have lied.
Legends handed down from locals is the first step any archeologists takes on any site. Who would know more than a person that was born and raised in the area ?
There are Pre-Ice Age civilizations to find still. There is evidence that the human genome is over 200,000 years ago. To suggest the same genetic make up of man was incapable of building mass civilization in pre ice age conditions is unfathomable in how short sighted it is. Humans become hunter gatherers in times of scarcity and should not be considered the primary origin when discussing people only 50, 000 years ago or less.
@@mykulpierce That it is possible, I suppose it is. Is there solid evidence for it, not that I've ever heard about. These civilisations should have artefacts that are still in existence yet, we've seen nothing that proves that they did exist, at least, nothing that is overwhelmingly solid. Modern human civilisation had to start at some time and it appears to have changed sometime after the last ice age. There are no cities, buildings or remnants of any advanced human civilisations anywhere on this planet. If they can find the sites of primitive hunter gatherers living 10,000 years ago, surely they'd be able to find the sites of advanced populations of that time. The fact that there are none is a good indication that there were none at the time.
@@JackHaveman52 the problem arises from how deep such civilizations would be and if the Fertile Crescent may havr extended into the Sahara desert today. meaning that are ancient civilizations maybe underneath sand but it's seldom Traversed today.
Oral history should never be discounted. It should not be taken as exact factual history, but most of the stories have roots in actual events. Two points with this type of discovery: 1.) the west coast could have remained unfrozen. Look at Alaska, 40F at the shore and go behind the first mountain and it's -40F 2.) the sea was 200 feet lower, most settlements are probably under up to 200 feet of water.
we have aboriginal oral history of the beginings of the great barrier reef more than ten thousand years ago, featured on david attenbourgh series on the same, oral history backed up by science.
This is not a new idea. E. James Dixon published a book, "Boats, Bones and Bison" in 1999 that pushed for coastal settlement. There has been no scientific consensus for decades.
It’s a pretty stupid idea, or at least not presented with any supporting evidence in this video. The land bridge was real, and people did indeed traverse it... I don’t see where boats come into play.
@@g.e.o.r.g.e... The land bridge was very unlikely as most people understand it. Most moved along the coast because the inland was mostly glaciated, or had not recovered from glacial retreat. There was plenty of food along the coast and good travel. Why hike through an arctic desert with very low food density? Certainly there was a "bridge" but it is more likely that people used boats when they could.
@@g.e.o.r.g.e... Both are likely, and both have evidence for them. It is already known that multiple waves of human settlement occurred at different times in the Americas in different ways. The latest wave, the ancestors of the Inuit, arrived roughly 4500-2300 BP. By then the sea level had risen to its modern range, and thus they would have used skin boats/umiaks to get around. It is likely that similar crossings were made at times when sea levels had not dropped. Seafaring is known to have existed by that point, and nowadays purported sites in Monte Verde and Paisley caves are used as evidence for the "Kelp Highway" theory.
Interesting story out of the native histories in the Alberta, Can area is about a crystal city that sunk into the ground. These ancient stories may sound weird, but frequently they turn out to be true.
This video should have mentioned the Solutrean hypothesis. This video mentions that people may have used boats to live off the ocean 14000 years ago on the west coast near Asia. The Solutrean hypothesis is supported by similar evidence of European migration over the ocean to North America's east coast 17000 - 22000 years ago. The two pieces of information are very closely related.
There's a huge difference between hugging the land by the Bering land Bridge as it was back then and paddling across the entire open ocean of the Atlantic in a primitive wooden vessel. Think about the practicality of what you just said. No other archaeologists posit the Atlantic crossing theory for a reason. It's just not a sound theory.
AS I mentioned above, there is nothing in the Solutrean hypothesis that is legit. There is no reliable evidence that supports a transatlantic migration. If you're referring to the Solutrean spear point, there is no trail of possession. There is even no record of the fishing boat that supposedly dredged up the spearpoint from the Chesapeake. Even looking at the spear point its obvious as most paleontologists and other experts say, that it is not Solutrean because: 1. The dates are wrong. 2. The size is wrong. 3. The knapping technique is wrong. 4. There’s no fluted base in the Solutrean material. The Solutreans would have to cross three thousand miles of open ocean or Arctic pack ice to get to the Americas. Nothing we know about them says that they had that ability. Nothing that we know about them suggests that they would be motivated to develop it; the whole point of being a Solutrean (or Clovis) was living off big game. Moreover, in 2014, DNA from a 12,500 year old infant of the Clovis culture was sequenced; the skeleton was found in association with Clovis artifacts. (see scienceblogs.com/aardvarchaeology/2014/02/13/genetic-study-kills-off-solutrean-hypothesis/). The DNA showed strong affinities to Paleolithic populations known from Siberia, in an area west of Lake Baikal, known as the Mal'ta-Buret' culture. The Clovis DNA also had strong affinities with contemporary Native Americans. No significant European ties were found, which makes the Solutrean hypothesis highly unlikely.
Check out the " never out of site of land" theory, about ancient mariners setting out from Bristol and travelling basically--iceland---greenland---baffin island--- newfoundland. Apparently, from a perch atop the mast a lookout wouldnt be out of site of land during the whole journey....
Tlingit history from Alaska south along the west coast has many parallels with this find. Great to see more evidence for another rewrite of history. Much respect to those oral traditions.
Same with most of the First Nations along the Haida Gwaii and the BC mainland have similar origin stories. Some of them have been accurate enough to guide archaeologists (as in this video) to some significant finds along the coast, such as the 13,000 year old footprints found on Calvert Island in the Haida Gwaii.
@@larryclyons Calvert Island has uplifted ~300 feet as the ocean has risen 300 feet. It is one of the few areas on earth where the ancient coastline is not submerged. Very interesting!
I wonder if there was an ocean currant at that time which kept the ocean level down and the temperature warmer, much like the Gulf Stream effect on Britain today
yes, but not the same level of rise or lowering everywhere. Its why the islands near the equator are feeling the effects of the caps melting and not everywhere at once
It's Schliemann's Troy all over again, and it's wonderful to see! Legends hang around for a good reason sometimes, as do place-names and the memory of sacred earth. This sort of thing gives me hope for future finds.
There are so many theories. I have always heard this theory referred to as "The kelp highway" its important to try to understand how the coast would have looked when the ocean was 200 meters lower than present. Most archeological sites are submerged as a result. I personally believe the Seberian colonists may have taken several routes, land and sea. Starting 15000 years back seems the consensus.
Please share the spelling of the name of this island...this is my neck of the woods and I think I know where you speak but would like to confirm on a map. The ice age supposedly missed the Haida Gwaii Islands as well. There is a reason we call these people First Nations.
Yup, "In the beginning everything was water and ice, with only a narrow strip of shore". But there were already redheaded giants here when the Indians arrived. The giants are the first nations and the Heiltsuk seemed to be first only after they embarked on a program of genocide against them.
Duncan Crow Is that oral tradition? Or is this info somewhere I can reference? Never heard your story out here. I know about the big reds. I am not sure they existed here on the West Coast as well. Sasquatch is here still.
Mle MaruGuru --A local police officer had an elongated skull from a Nanaimo Beach for several months. The Salish didn't want it. A friend and her posse visited an ancient cave that has a mummified giant in it, near Nuxalk. The Devils club that grows so plentifully contains a DNA splice that our labs can't duplicate, of offworld DNA. It can't spread to all those niches up the ravines by itself, is planted via cuttings, and it's been here for just 3,000 years, by way of Ontario for 2,000 years, and previous to that, China for 2,000 years. Can you say global trade? If you don't have legends about who worked on the Devil's Club farms, maybe y'all weren't even here. Sasquatch spotted a few times in Bella Coola. All of the natives down the coast have legends about the redhead giants, the Chinook, too of lower Columbia river, and we have bones also in California and Utah. The northern seas are completely diked but that's fairly recent, huge scale and fit for sea level just 12 feet lower than today. Russian side too and it looks completely mined out like everything is tailings and ponds.
Duncan Crow I wouldn't trust a cop from Nanaimo and area if my life depended upon it! With that being said thanks for your input on the Devils Club and all. Of course I wasn't here for the farms nor were my peoples (who ever they were). Thanks for assuming I am First Nations, but I am not, except maybe thru osmosis. ;)
I've been around long enough to learn you don't dismiss local legends. The practice of passing on a tribe's heritage was done as a group, not one person per generation telling one person from the next. That way the story doesn't get modified because of all the witnesses. It is totally bogus to compare this to "chinese whispers" or the "telephone game" of passing on information. During genealogy research I confirmed a number of family legends which nobody knew when they first appeared. Plus a few other details never passed down about unwed mothers as an example.
you can travel a long way staying close to shore. making land and setting out again...traveling like this is common in the time before clocks and dead lines ....to keep on the move refreshes resources and moves people away from waste that piles up
Akhenaten's treasure was found, and the heavily-decorated sarcophagus wood was found to be 14,000 years old, also well-predating ancient Egypt or even Sumeria. Atlantean heirlooms. Perhaps that explains in part why there were giants here before the Heiltsuk arrived.
the roman were nothing more than a 2k year old war like barbarian tribe who took all its knowledge from the much older Greeks . the Greeks who took their knowledge from the much much older Egyptians and their ancient archives . which were nearly all destroyed by the first roman Christian zealots.
Hello! I am a long-term head of archaeological excavations, dissertation student. I can complete an archaeological report, including drawings. I have a georadar and can work with it. Can I find a job in Canada not as a leader, but as part of a team? I can send my works and list of publications. Knowledge of English is average, but I can pull it up.
This is only if you still blindly accept the out of Africa migration theory which needs to be rewritten since the number of artifacts found since its publication leave it to be disproven even if mainstream old academics will not face it. Ignoring artifacts that show repeatedly people in the North American region were here long before current theory states is foolish.
Canadian Girl So. What are u saying? That the aboriginal First Nations people have no claim to the land and the descendants of the white folks that stole their land (then slaughtered them, then made laws that classified them as the second class citizens they already treated them like, and killed their language and culture while simultaneously subjecting a majority of their children to sexually and physically abuse in the State Schools they were forced by law to attend) should feel absolutely no guilt about not stepping aside to donate some of it back? Are u saying what happened to the Natives was fair? Cuz they traveled here too? I really hope not. Cuz there is one glaring difference. The Natives actually discovered the land. Like in real life.
From what I read somewhere, the Natives immigrated here from South America. People move around. They always have. Was there someone here before the Natives? People have been invading and confiscating land since Lord knows how long. Maybe since man has been around. People always talk about the Indians because they are the most recent ones who were taken over. I'm sure there were others before them.
Remember the episode where they all got old, and McCoy kept saying "l am just a simple country doctor". Spock snapped back" l surmised as much." Logic verses humanity the same fight we all struggle with today. The frist Star Trek is the one l know the best. Spock's struggle with his human side was one of my favorite plot points. I watched Next Generation, 7of 9 was a female Spock taken to the extreme. Also the doctor hologram was a very interesting character, like you said. Are you a Dr Who fan too?
Nice age I agree withsome of what you said but it's still 2000 years after there were people knapping in well established quarry sites in Texas. I'm also glad you all are open to the hole boating to America idea as it would have been just as likely they hunted seals down the ice shelf from south west France and ran snack dab into the north American continent love me a good mystery
I went to an open public lecture with Parks Canada and associates in Victoria, BC in 2009. The photos are staged because the site is between the high and low tide line, making excavation incredibly difficult. In addition, two hour "waves" of black flies, mosquitos, no-see-ums, and other bugs make your day entertaining. That's why those artifact photos show that the pieces have been under water: the site IS under water.
Because New York Times said, end of XIX Century,... that in Filipinas Spaniards eat children. I came from Monterrei, Galicia, Spain.... I eat a child every morning !!!!
@@aidanmagill6769 you should have stayed shut up before you said that. For there is tons of evidence to support it. But nevermind just do as you're told move long
Conjecture and speculation. Seals and sea lions rest on the land. Slow and fat, they're easy kills. Cruising the coastline in a canoe doesn't make you a sea fairing people. Still pretty interesting to find settlements from 14k years ago.
Hi! A couple of years or more ago did you hear before posting this that they revealed more data from the Cerutti Mastodon Site near San Diego, CA a site complete with stone items the ancient people used to kill it. It has been dated to 130,000 years ago. I wonder if like this site the real question hasn't been answered of whether or not it was a failed attempt to colonize North America. That's a key question I'd think, but only my amateur view. In this far northern area it would have been difficult to trek inland and inhabit where much farther south it would have been more conducive to migrating inland... but only my amateur view. Did you communicate with the Archaeologists at this site? Thanks for posting this interesting find!
Does it really matter, other than to science and people who want to discredit science because we don't have all the answers. We may never have all the answers but we were given a brain so we should use it.
Scientists need to stop being so narrow minded as if they look into old fable stories and myths were based on facts. When we truly open our eyes and thought patterns then maybe we'll find very shocking but true origin of humanity.
10,000 years ago the real first nations were already here when our local first nation imposters arrived; it's in all the legends across North America. The people were redheaded giants, like everywhere else. The local natives had a hard time killing them all off; it took thousands of years to get the upper hand.
Yes! A number of people arrived along the coast of North America and arrived at more than one location. Also, evidence has been found that shows ancient people immigrated OUT of North America across the Bering land straight to what is now called Beringia. Archaeological evidence has been held and suppressed by archaeologists and privately funded institutions and the US and Canadian governments have had knowledge for a number of years about these facts. People should know. People should understand. I’ve always wondered why this knowledge was suppressed and the answer is very simple. Fear. They are afraid of what will happen if people are allowed to know that North America in places now known as Canada and the United States is far more agent than we have been told Allie human beings were living here not only over 10,000 years ago but as far back as 20,000 years ago. Possibly longer. We will wait and see if more evidence is uncovered. I recently found a small assemblage of ancient tools in South Carolina that suggests one localized area was inhabited for over 6000 years and up to 10,000 years… perhaps longer. With help from a morally upright archaeologists and a local tribe that still lives in the area hopefully this will be proven true in the history of this particular state as well as southeastern America will indeed be corrected. The people who were here deserve that. A number of privately funded institutions are finally realizing that you can’t hold the tide back with a broom.
The Solutreans crossed the Atlantic to the East Coast of North America 20,000 years ago. Clovis point were developed in what is now Central France. Wake Up! The "First People from Asia" weren't here first. Cherokee oral history reveals that there were peoples living in the southeastern US when they arrived. The Cherokees killed them according to the oral history. There are ancient Western European DNA markers in many members of the Ojibwe as well.
I'm ojibway..I credit my European ancestry to my European relatives who came here in 1700s. I've always thought those Clovis points were iffy. I remember having a great instructor who had us discussing this. It seems that north American ancestors might have went to Europe rather than them coming here with those Clovis points.
Loretta Favel the evidence for the solutrean hypothesis is absolutely overwhelming at this point... but we will never hear about it bc it's not politically correct
Aidan Magill despite your condescending tone, he's actually not wrong. More and more evidence is being unearthed constantly that's proving the solutrean hypothesis correct.
I take issue with the "most scientists believe that Beringia was crossed during the last glacial maximum." I think it would be more correct to say that much evidence points to North American settlement by humans going back at least 18-20,000 years BP. That makes it a "so far" statement about settlement based on concrete evidence in hand, rather than a definitive statement about scientific consensus.
Some people think that the ancients were stupid. Lewis & Clark used rivers to go from St. Louis to the Pacific and used boats to do it. "Ancients" didn't travel through some open ice corridor. They used boats to go from Asia to North America. Like the Native Alaskans do today. Go for a walk in an ancient forest. You can't get through. Imagine going from Alaska to the Tip of South America through the jungle. They used boats. Wooden boats that no longer exist. They traveled on the rivers to go East. Just like the Europeans did when they came to Eastern North America. Those old timers weren't stupid. Just the people that believe that "theory" on how America was peopled. The Northwest coast is warmed by the pacific currents just like Britain and Northwestern Europe is warmed by The Gulf Stream.
The unglaciated areas of northern North America would not have had forests. The climate was colder then (thus the ice age). The landscape would have been tundra. Large areas farther south, as is the case today, would be open prairies. Also ancient forests tend to be quite open under the canopy. What you see today does not represent the forests of the past. In addition there are a lot of people who have lived in jungles over the thousands of years and they seem to have travelled though them with relative ease. Both routes, by ocean and land, likely are true.
The find does not suggest that an inland migration did not occur. It could have been a combination of migratory methods - moving along the coast in boats and moving by foot. Second, this find does not confirm some native myth as fact. There is no way in hell that such history could have been passed unchanged for 14,000 years to modern Indians who are unrelated to the people who made the camp 14,000 year ago. Its just coincidence. But of course, science is captive to politics and everyone knows that Indians are these super mystics who are capable of preserving lost history for 14,000 years.
Problem is with the Ice Free corridor is that for most of its existence, ~18K to 15K BCE, it was a biological wasteland Nothing grew there. It was only in the last 3000 years (14K to 11K bce) that there was any appreciable biomass. So how could people migrate along it. www.history.com/news/new-study-refutes-theory-of-how-humans-populated-north-america
why should anyone be surprised by this? It is easy to travel along a coast, always keeping in sight of land and entering bays and inlets in search of a new home for those illegal immigrants!!!
A lot of people assume native oral history is myth, or that it's not accurate. However, the Hopi believe the same as the Sumerians did, which means despite the story being passed down so much, that story hasn't changed one bit. The Sumerians are long gone and the Hopi are still around today. Any native I've spoken with who is even slightly in touch with their roots, will tell you their people did NOT come here via any land bridge which we assume was there, whether it existed or not. The evidence found near Central America which is older than the land bridge evidence by thousands of years actually confirms this. Natives came over by boat, actually by ship if you'd believe it. This is more than plausible as Egyptians had ships at that time, made of grass, which they did travel on the oceans with, so no doubt other people also had ships.
Not to be picky but it was " fascinating" all though I do recall one episode where Mcoy told Spock that if he said the particular incident was " fascinating" he would lose it( I am paraphraseing here) and Spock responded "all though it wasn't fascinating it was however interesting". That may be the source of your confusion.
sh** a piece of my brain oozes out my nasal cavity as bright green snot! Thank you for my nice warm fuzzy correction. I just love it when archaeology proves a new fact about how people started taking over Earth! You see my IQ is too low to be Steve Hawkings and not high enough to remember anything but Barbie dolls!!! Live long and prosper!
It’s interesting, but you can’t deny the facts in regard to migration over the Bering Strait land bridge. Horses and Camels are American based species that went the other way over the bridge before the water covered it. Paleo Indians hunted the megafauna class of animals to extinction, which included horses, camels, mammoths, giant beaver, and others. Aside from American bison, the only animals left were around 100-150 pound wild animals. In any case, they have connected Paleo and archaic and Woodland era movements across the Americas to Asians on the other side (Siberian peoples)
Justin Trudeau is an idiot & a traitor to Canadian people & Canada... he seems to love his radical Muslim brotherhood way too much..when is he finally going to get voted out of office or maybe disappear for good, why won't he just move to the middle east
We didn't "first arrive" we have Always Been Here... This is Our Homeland. Fact: When the so called Modern Man was just Starting to venture Out of Africa, we were Already Here. We are the Great Old Man of the World... The First. You call us Neanderthal. Neanderthal Originates in America. Period. - TPO
life all started hundreds of millions of years ago, and slowly evolved, and while evolving as all things had some sorts of common ancestors, it stands that early humans and like all creatures there were more than one kind of early human evolved worldwide at different rates, but worldwide just take religion out of the equation and common sense will win the day
Come to saddlelake Cree nation and say that to any Cardinal bud my family will gladly teach you other wise.. 😊 I have no reason to argue with an ignorant person about my people and the genocide that had happened to all native Americans or the injustice that goes on even now a days.. I personally am not hindered but anything have grown up and have moved off the reservation. Have a great job.make tons of money. Travel.. Have nice stuff.. And I grew up an orphan on the reservation.. How ever I am saddened at the state of my people and the youth.. And feel that as a nation we do need to come together before we are lost..i came from nothing and ask for nothing but try to give back and help my people.. I lost a baby sister to suicide... in your world just another statistic... in my world another wonderful human being.. But to answer you, yes as human beings we do have rights. and as the first ones it is our right. By birth or blood. As for these peace treaties there a joke and as for my people what's wrong with a nation of people asking for fairness and equality? For broken promises to fulfilled? I have to remember ww2 and what Germans did to the jews... But what about my people and what the world did to us??
I do apologize To be honest my comment was more pertaining to modern-day Academia and their definition of a Native American Aboriginal First Nations indigenous people based on the theory the modern person that has evolved from the caveman only existed few thousand years ago, although however I do believe that a people and a global civilization did and have existed before all of us prior the great flood and Do pre date us by possibly a million years or more who knows and have disappeared due to some Global catastrophe unknown, I don't know whether that correlates with the Bible or with aliens or with the Legends of old that have been passed down in different cultures and bliefs like Hinduism, Egyptians India and their teachings as well as in our own cultural teachings and legends and beliefs.. and how they all correlate and go together... So yes you are right that technically there are no First Nations Aboriginal people in a sense but yes there are cuz here we are it's our sense of pride makes us us 😁 cheers
I'm glad you know. I've just been through more research that points to early Siberian origins of many North American natives, as we know there are middle eastern origins for others, and of course the Shemsu Hor giants were everywhere. The tribes being mainly genetically unrelated to each other make it undecided who were really here first among the tribes. Need more data. I do believe in identity and even nationalism-light; people need a healthy sense of pride and purpose.
Finding a 10,000 yr old site is nothing new...40,000 yr old Clovis sites have already been found in the USA and I found a site that is a Neanderthal site in Idaho that is approx. 125,000 yrs old, but for some reason the smithsonian are not interested... probably because they didn't find it and I won't tell them the location because they are covering up our history and they won't give you credit for it anyway....Dennis Stanford(the head of the Smithsonian) wants all the credit himself...also a site was found back in the 1960s just south of the US border in Mexico that was dated to 250,000 yrs ago...
It is a religion. All "science" is, is a way for our puny minds to try to comprehend the incomprehensible. Through the ages, that's all religion has ever been. Chronocentrism has a lot to do with it.
No because unlike religion, science is based on theories and tests. All able to be modified, or rejected as more information in learned. Religion is rigid and does not accept changes like science
trevor pierce I think science is more rigid than you think it is, or at least the people who deem what is acceptable are themselves are rigid, which turns out to be the same thing, and religion is more fluid than you think. If it doesn't fit one's beliefs, just create a new one. I guess science does the same thing though. Just as we have quantum mechanics now, with it's proponents and detractors. There's plenty of dogma to go around, and it's probably mostly bullshit. In 1000 years we will look very primitive, 1000 years after that.... so on and so forth.
Yes, but they need to find a skeleton proving those people of the past simply didn't pass story telling down to the next group moving into the area. That would be science.
Blake Doucette all the indian legends say that when the indians arrived in North America the first nations were giants, already here, and hard to get along with.
Horse manure... Vikings and Scots made the trip over during the ice age from Europe to the east coast of Canada and America... Except their trip dates to a thousand [in some reported science belief to six thousand] years before this account in video of 14 thousand years ago... In other words this video helps prove they arrived later [over the Bering land bridge] than those who arrived on the North American Continents east coast... We are talking the Vikings and Scots arrived 15 to 20 thousand years ago... Well earlier than this reported 14 thousand years ago...
Sith'ari Azithoth, Except that’s a complete lie, since Neanderthal fossils or even knowledge of them was never rooted in North America. Either you’re talking out of your ass, or repeating what some other dumbass said.
The Neanderthals were eventually slaughtered in multitudes by the darker skinned humans from the southern regions that are presently referred to as native Americans.
If occupied for 7,000 years, it doesn't show migration... And there is no way that ocean levels changed all over the Earth due to ice sheet thawing and didn't effect that Island.
johnnie mcatee They looked for that evidence when the Israeli's took the Sinai, they flooded hundreds of archaeologists into the Sinai, spent 20 years looking and found NOTHING, no million plus Hebrews wandering for 40 years, that WOULD have left a mark. They concluded that moses and the exodus was a complete fabrication.
And some of the historical events mentioned in the Pentatuch are verifiable but no evidence of floods, no evidence of parting seas and no evidence of any kind that there was a 'god' that told the Jews to commit the genocides, infanticide or any of the other atrocities mentioned there, the probability is that those events happened but none that shows a god made them do it.
rstevewarmorycom Absolutely nothing written down by the Egyptians about an exodus of hundreds of thousands of "slaves" . The Egyptians were meticulous historians with 2 forms of writing.
oltedders -- No on-the-ground research work has been able to uncover any evidence of the exodus myth being true. People just bugged out from under the fallout as fast as they could, or died.
What's so earth-shattering about the idea of humans coming by boat? That has been going around for decades. Coming by boat is much faster than trudging along across frozen glaciers which may or may not support enough life to supply the bands of humans very long. Coming by sea makes a lot more sense. Also, archaeologists have been looking at the very distinct possibility that South America may have been peopled by seafarers as well. They have found evidence of human occupation dating long before bands of humans could have wondered down from North America, through Central America, and into South America.
Europeans living along the coast of Spain, France & Ireland were the first people to reach the Americas. However, once the Atlantic ice sheets melted, they were left isolated & eventually wiped-out or assimilated by Asians who migrated to N. America en' mass. Or, they just died out!
Until evidence is found to support that statement, it is absolute hogwash. And if you are referring to the Solutrean culture, no conclusive evidence has ever been found in North America that they made it here, just as there has never been evidence found that Neanderthal was ever here.
Well possibly partially true, is some disputed evidence that to suggest that Europeans came to North America thousands of years before the people of Siberia did and if true, probably all died out before they got here, so would of been devoid of humans. Plus Europeans then were dark skinned, not white.
It's obvious migration started from South America, probably coming from the pacific islands. The highest level of civilisation is found in South America and becomes more nomadic as we look northword. I would also say the migration was from North America to Northern Asia not the other accepted way around. South American culture was there before the end of the ice age and people moved northward as the ice receded; eventually crossing over to Northern Asia.
Scientific conclusions and insights are the result of verifiable replicable data based on observation and measurement and peer reviewed, religion is a blind belief in a superior being and devoid of any supporting evidence, humans may never know exactly "what really went on", but I would rather accept conclusions based on facts as apposed to conclusions based faith.
It is ridiculous to even compare science with religion. One is evidence based with an ongoing and unprecedented history of creating knowledge and new technology while the other is made up, rigid and based on naive superstition.
"Modern" people tend to forget what a dedicated hard working pioneering persevering person can do. Walk 20 miles a day for 200 straight days, spend 5 weeks on a raft or primitive canoe and with good winds and no typhoons sail 3,000 miles, etc. Or sail along hugging the coast. A rough life but lots of people at various times of course made journeys. Some survived, most did not
Don't politicise academics. When you do that you'll end up doing exactly what you're accusing them of doing, you'll mould it to fit your perception. Oral history is myth wrapped in legend and facts. It's quite often difficult to know one from the other. So you treat it with open scepticism and use it as a guide not as fact. Pay no attention to the race baiter.
his story has absolutely nothing to do with with gender in spanish the word is historia also his root ...male in spanish ?no... its simply a coincidence in english
ace love ~ Apparently you missed the part where it was proven they did not come from Siberia. They are the First Nation people, they were here as far as anyone knows now, since the beginning (so far). Getting "their" land back does not entail other people having to leave, but being given credit where credit is due, plus giving much needed land back that was taken by the government, rather than only having reservation land that was the "shit" land to the government to begin with. Think about changing your name from ace love to ace ass!
Ree Noneya no. their ancestors/blood relatives still live in Siberia and Mongolia. DNA proves this, but we don't even need DNA you can us your own eyes. the first migrants made it all the way to south America and the last of the three waves of migrations made it all the way to Greenland. they are all Mongoliod peoples.
It has always been acknowledged that they are the original peoples of Canada.The name “Canada” likely comes from the Huron-Iroquois word “kanata,” meaning “village” or “settlement.” This discovery is just confirmation of what has always been theorized. They just had not found physical proof until now and we do use their oral histories to inform us on past events that predate written documentation and then look for physical evidence to confirm it which is exactly what happened here. They clearly state that they were directed to look in that area by the oral history of the people living in that area.
Not an ice age. We are in an ice age. It has being going on for abour 2.75m years with around 30 (depending on how you define them) cycles between glacial and interglacial periods. The recent glacial period which lasted from about 125,000 years ago when we were in the Eemain interglacial and until about 12.5 thousand years ago when the ice really started to melt is a glacial period, not an ice age.
Living on the coast would have been on a coast that is now under water. Artifacts found on the sea floor prove that. No t to mention that if the straight was above water then so were shore lines.
waterways have always been the most efficient transport available when it comes to moving goods and equipment. did anybody really believe people would explore a new world without being able to transport all the stuff they might need? you think they would deliberately limit themselves to what they could carry on their backs when they could travel so much more if traveling by boat? and the sea is rich in resources aiding in their journey as opposed to the land where there are fewer resources that were harder to catch or extremely limited resources at or crossing glaciers
~14,000 years ago the earth was in a notable warming period. Not quite as warm as today but everything would not have been encased in ice. Regardless, it still made sense to put your dwelling into the earth as it would have been warmer.
That has been my philosophy for years. The west coast was ice free and provided a small area for living quarters, food, and fishing. At the same time, on the east coast white Europeans, from southern Britain and France, were crossing the ice in search of food and came upon North America. They met in the Great Lakes area. The Ojibway tribe in Northern Ontario have evidence in their DNA of white/native interbreeding.
The Solutrean hypothesis on the peopling of the Americas states that the earliest human migration to the Americas took place from Europe, during the Last Glacial Maximum.
they probably failed to mention it because the hypothesis had been debunked. phys.org/news/2016-01-genetic-ancient-trans-atlantic-migration-professor.html
Not shocking. People make and use boats. The ocean going Polynesian people have been traveling the entire Pacific since forever. There are connections with Alaska to Hawaii and to New Zealand.
Auggies1956 DNA testing has traced Polynesian ancestry back to the original natives of Taiwan. However, more recent DNA testing also points to the Northern Philippines and possibly also to mainland China. There is also some Melanesian DNA in some Polynesians as well. I cannot find any link to Peruvian DNA in Polynesians.
Can water pouring down for 40 days melt big blocks ice that would have been there? What would have been the season there during the great flood and rain for 40 days?
its common knowledge (tribal lore) that our ancestors were primarily seafarers. when i mention this, i get smirks and raised lips. sadly, the lore is nearly forgotten,
Topper site...way older. And others, as well. AND, YOU CANNOT CLAIM LAND RIGHTS just because your ancient ancestors MAY have inhabited said piece of land. Ridiculous.
There are recent examples of native people's ability to subsist on the ice pack. In the 1920s a group of hunters were stranded on the ice pack in Northern Alaska. They stayed with the ice and subsisted on seals and other animals for over 3 months before they were able to get back to shore. They had drifted over 400 miles from their village, so...they walked back and asked no one for help. They were fine.
never dismiss native folklore,the more we find the less we know,
I'm a cab driver in Fairbanks Alaska. In 1991 I picked up a gentleman from Denmark who just arrive for the Circumpolar Conference that was underway. As we talked he recounted his time having spent six years as a social worker in Greenland. He learned the Inuit language and enjoyed spending time listening to the tales told by the elders. There was one tale they recounted that would only make sense if understood as men hunting the Woolly Mammoth. How far back oral traditions may take us.
An elder from Greenland (at one of the circumpolar conferences interestingly enough) told of land that used to be forest before the glacier. That’s a collective memory from over 30,000 years ago! And those patches of land shared by the elder were the first to get exposed when the glacier started melting more quickly in the 1990s.
@@tao.of.history8366 The Bolling Allerod warm period peak was about 12,500 years ago. The next warm period before that was around 100,000 years ago. I don't know where you get a warm period around 30,000 years ago?
It seems we are learning that our ancestors were pretty darn smart. Fairly recently found evidence that humans have been in North America for way longer than originally thought and is now believed to be one of the earlier places humans lived. This is just fascinating to me
Excellent insights! Oral history gets some more respect at last! The rediscovery of Troy was not a fluke. German adventurer Heinrich Schliemann, digging with the direction of British archaeologist Frank Calvert, uncovered the many cities of Troy because they paid attention to the oral histories of the region. It is good news indeed that academic archaeology is unable to continue its a priori dismissal of the traditionally-preserved oral history of the First Nations.
What about the pre-clovis finds on the Savannah River that have been dated to between 16,000 and 18,000 years ago?
James Michener says they followed whales back and forth - you might find a harpoon. One whale could feed, clothe and house a village for 2 yrs. The book is "Alaska" by James Michener.
Ice-free coasts during the ice age makes perfect sense. It takes a lot of evaporation to cause so much frozen precipitation to fall and accumulate on the continents. Much evaporation means warm oceans, so heat from the warm oceans would keep coastal lands ice-free.
During the Ice Age Alaska was warmer after the land bridge blocked the arctic/pacific warm/cold mixing. The pacific was warmer after being blocked and it kept the coastal areas much warmer than today. This is a well established, but forgotten fact. Eastern arctic and North America from Utah to the east coast pretty much was glaciated the worst.
We now know that "Alaska" and probably part of BC were not covered with ice.
They used to talk about an "ice bridge", so they could get across the Bering Straight, but they now know that the ocean levels were lower then and it was a "land bridge".
Yeah I’m from BC Canada and it’s a fact! we gave it to the Americans but I mean geologically speaking it has more in common with the west cost of Canada.
There have been theories that people moved along the coast in boats. Also, during the Ice Age, there would have been more land above the sea. It makes sense.
What’s the supporting evidence for this boat theory? A fishhook?
They could’ve walked, and there’s at least proof that some did.
and 8,000 years ago the islands off BC were not only connected to the mainland, but it was grassland and grizzly country and large ungulates. So to say there were no survival foods on the coast is ridiculous. Parks Canada lectures abut this site also include a bear cave excavation at the same time in the Charlottes, where a bear mandible was found that is 17 1/2 inches long. The bear would be looking in your second floor window. It's in the Victoria Museum. 2009 lecture.
@@royboate3641
That's 8000 years ago. The glaciers had receded a great deal by then. 14,000 years ago, those glaciers were near their maximum and where bears are living now and 8000 years ago, there would have been nearly a mile of ice.
@@g.e.o.r.g.e... BTW you do know that over the last few years archaeologists along the Haida Gwaii have made some remarkable finds, including footprints from 13,000 years ago alongside a fishing weir and a campfire remains.
www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/ancient-bc-footprints-earliest-known-north-america-1.4599568
Do me a favour. Do an experiment. Put a known volume of water in a container and mark it’s level. Then take some of the water and freeze it and put it back in the water and recheck the level. They have been lying all along. This simple experiment will prove they have lied.
Good video Jojo thanks for this. Very cool
Legends handed down from locals is the first step any archeologists takes on any site. Who would know more than a person that was born and raised in the area ?
Human history is a lie from a traditional perspective.
We have been here a lot longer than most of us have been lead believe
You speak from devils..God created the world
Great and thought provoking video ! God Bless these field archeologists who went out in the boon docks to dig this site !
I still find it absolutely amazing how many experts there are out there on the internet
Habs Fan I earned a PhD from UA-cam.
The more we learn about the past, the more we prove that we don't have a clue about the past.
Agree with many of the others here: Amazing! Thank you for sharing the story here.
We haven't reached the bottom of human history yet Their will be earlier finds to come
Absolutely 👍
Bones in Yukon Cave Show Humans in North America 24,000 Years Ago, Study Says
Western Digs
westerndigs.org/category/archaeology/page/2/
There are Pre-Ice Age civilizations to find still. There is evidence that the human genome is over 200,000 years ago. To suggest the same genetic make up of man was incapable of building mass civilization in pre ice age conditions is unfathomable in how short sighted it is.
Humans become hunter gatherers in times of scarcity and should not be considered the primary origin when discussing people only 50, 000 years ago or less.
@@mykulpierce
That it is possible, I suppose it is. Is there solid evidence for it, not that I've ever heard about. These civilisations should have artefacts that are still in existence yet, we've seen nothing that proves that they did exist, at least, nothing that is overwhelmingly solid.
Modern human civilisation had to start at some time and it appears to have changed sometime after the last ice age. There are no cities, buildings or remnants of any advanced human civilisations anywhere on this planet. If they can find the sites of primitive hunter gatherers living 10,000 years ago, surely they'd be able to find the sites of advanced populations of that time. The fact that there are none is a good indication that there were none at the time.
@@JackHaveman52 the problem arises from how deep such civilizations would be and if the Fertile Crescent may havr extended into the Sahara desert today. meaning that are ancient civilizations maybe underneath sand but it's seldom Traversed today.
Oral history should never be discounted. It should not be taken as exact factual history, but most of the stories have roots in actual events.
Two points with this type of discovery:
1.) the west coast could have remained unfrozen. Look at Alaska, 40F at the shore and go behind the first mountain and it's -40F
2.) the sea was 200 feet lower, most settlements are probably under up to 200 feet of water.
the northern seas are diked for a sea level barely 15 feet lower than today's
(#2) And rotted or pulverized into oblivion.
we have aboriginal oral history of the beginings of the great barrier reef more than ten thousand years ago, featured on david attenbourgh series on the same, oral history backed up by science.
This is not a new idea. E. James Dixon published a book, "Boats, Bones and Bison" in 1999 that pushed for coastal settlement. There has been no scientific consensus for decades.
It’s a pretty stupid idea, or at least not presented with any supporting evidence in this video.
The land bridge was real, and people did indeed traverse it... I don’t see where boats come into play.
@Old Heathen what?
@@g.e.o.r.g.e... The land bridge was very unlikely as most people understand it. Most moved along the coast because the inland was mostly glaciated, or had not recovered from glacial retreat. There was plenty of food along the coast and good travel. Why hike through an arctic desert with very low food density? Certainly there was a "bridge" but it is more likely that people used boats when they could.
@@g.e.o.r.g.e... Both are likely, and both have evidence for them. It is already known that multiple waves of human settlement occurred at different times in the Americas in different ways.
The latest wave, the ancestors of the Inuit, arrived roughly 4500-2300 BP. By then the sea level had risen to its modern range, and thus they would have used skin boats/umiaks to get around.
It is likely that similar crossings were made at times when sea levels had not dropped. Seafaring is known to have existed by that point, and nowadays purported sites in Monte Verde and Paisley caves are used as evidence for the "Kelp Highway" theory.
Interesting story out of the native histories in the Alberta, Can area is about a crystal city that sunk into the ground. These ancient stories may sound weird, but frequently they turn out to
be true.
This video should have mentioned the Solutrean hypothesis. This video mentions that people may have used boats to live off the ocean 14000 years ago on the west coast near Asia. The Solutrean hypothesis is supported by similar evidence of European migration over the ocean to North America's east coast 17000 - 22000 years ago. The two pieces of information are very closely related.
They do not want to talk about the solutreans. I firmly believe that they are the predecessors to the Clovis culture too many similarities
There's a huge difference between hugging the land by the Bering land Bridge as it was back then and paddling across the entire open ocean of the Atlantic in a primitive wooden vessel. Think about the practicality of what you just said. No other archaeologists posit the Atlantic crossing theory for a reason. It's just not a sound theory.
AS I mentioned above, there is nothing in the Solutrean hypothesis that is legit. There is no reliable evidence that supports a transatlantic migration. If you're referring to the Solutrean spear point, there is no trail of possession. There is even no record of the fishing boat that supposedly dredged up the spearpoint from the Chesapeake.
Even looking at the spear point its obvious as most paleontologists and other experts say, that it is not Solutrean because:
1. The dates are wrong.
2. The size is wrong.
3. The knapping technique is wrong.
4. There’s no fluted base in the Solutrean material.
The Solutreans would have to cross three thousand miles of open ocean or Arctic pack ice to get to the Americas.
Nothing we know about them says that they had that ability. Nothing that we know about them suggests that they would be motivated to develop it; the whole point of being a Solutrean (or Clovis) was living off big game.
Moreover, in 2014, DNA from a 12,500 year old infant of the Clovis culture was sequenced; the skeleton was found in association with Clovis artifacts. (see scienceblogs.com/aardvarchaeology/2014/02/13/genetic-study-kills-off-solutrean-hypothesis/).
The DNA showed strong affinities to Paleolithic populations known from Siberia, in an area west of Lake Baikal, known as the Mal'ta-Buret' culture. The Clovis DNA also had strong affinities with contemporary Native Americans. No significant European ties were found, which makes the Solutrean hypothesis highly unlikely.
@Doctor Drywell Agreed. I think I was saying that.
@@larryclyons you have no idea what you are talking about
And this is why most us finds went to the Smithsonian and put in boxes and never published. No proof no land rights
It is a wonderful discovery. It substantiates the value of oral histories.
Vary well put together. Nice job🕵️thank you sir.🎥
Check out the " never out of site of land" theory, about ancient mariners setting out from Bristol and travelling basically--iceland---greenland---baffin island--- newfoundland. Apparently, from a perch atop the mast a lookout wouldnt be out of site of land during the whole journey....
🎉
That it's been found in Heiltsuk territory makes it significant to my family and ancestors...
Tlingit history from Alaska south along the west coast has many parallels with this find. Great to see more evidence for another rewrite of history. Much respect to those oral traditions.
Same with most of the First Nations along the Haida Gwaii and the BC mainland have similar origin stories. Some of them have been accurate enough to guide archaeologists (as in this video) to some significant finds along the coast, such as the 13,000 year old footprints found on Calvert Island in the Haida Gwaii.
@@larryclyons Calvert Island has uplifted ~300 feet as the ocean has risen 300 feet. It is one of the few areas on earth where the ancient coastline is not submerged. Very interesting!
I wonder if there was an ocean currant at that time which kept the ocean level down and the temperature warmer, much like the Gulf Stream effect on Britain today
Warmer seas the ice melts , the ice melts the sea level rises .
yes, but not the same level of rise or lowering everywhere. Its why the islands near the equator are feeling the effects of the caps melting and not everywhere at once
It's Schliemann's Troy all over again, and it's wonderful to see! Legends hang around for a good reason sometimes, as do place-names and the memory of sacred earth. This sort of thing gives me hope for future finds.
FINALLY - Listen to oral histories - songs, dances, hula, chants, prayers. Western science has been stuck in one paradigm for too long.
This was a discovery made in my ancestors' traditional territory. It's almost inspiring enough to warrant claiming my Status-card...
Indians never had "traditional territory" the concept of owning land is a European import!
@@vanjimbo we arent from India ya incompetent buffoon
There are so many theories. I have always heard this theory referred to as "The kelp highway" its important to try to understand how the coast would have looked when the ocean was 200 meters lower than present. Most archeological sites are submerged as a result. I personally believe the Seberian colonists may have taken several routes, land and sea. Starting 15000 years back seems the consensus.
Agree, except I'd put it at maybe 40 kya rather than 15 kya
Very cool I'm surprised they're not trying to suppress this history.
Please share the spelling of the name of this island...this is my neck of the woods and I think I know where you speak but would like to confirm on a map. The ice age supposedly missed the Haida Gwaii Islands as well. There is a reason we call these people First Nations.
Yup, "In the beginning everything was water and ice, with only a narrow strip of shore".
But there were already redheaded giants here when the Indians arrived. The giants are the first nations and the Heiltsuk seemed to be first only after they embarked on a program of genocide against them.
Duncan Crow Is that oral tradition? Or is this info somewhere I can reference? Never heard your story out here. I know about the big reds. I am not sure they existed here on the West Coast as well. Sasquatch is here still.
Mle MaruGuru --A local police officer had an elongated skull from a Nanaimo Beach for several months. The Salish didn't want it. A friend and her posse visited an ancient cave that has a mummified giant in it, near Nuxalk. The Devils club that grows so plentifully contains a DNA splice that our labs can't duplicate, of offworld DNA. It can't spread to all those niches up the ravines by itself, is planted via cuttings, and it's been here for just 3,000 years, by way of Ontario for 2,000 years, and previous to that, China for 2,000 years. Can you say global trade?
If you don't have legends about who worked on the Devil's Club farms, maybe y'all weren't even here.
Sasquatch spotted a few times in Bella Coola.
All of the natives down the coast have legends about the redhead giants, the Chinook, too of lower Columbia river, and we have bones also in California and Utah.
The northern seas are completely diked but that's fairly recent, huge scale and fit for sea level just 12 feet lower than today. Russian side too and it looks completely mined out like everything is tailings and ponds.
Duncan Crow I wouldn't trust a cop from Nanaimo and area if my life depended upon it! With that being said thanks for your input on the Devils Club and all. Of course I wasn't here for the farms nor were my peoples (who ever they were). Thanks for assuming I am First Nations, but I am not, except maybe thru osmosis. ;)
Triquet Island www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/archeological-find-affirms-heiltsuk-nation-s-oral-history-1.4046088
I've been around long enough to learn you don't dismiss local legends. The practice of passing on a tribe's heritage was done as a group, not one person per generation telling one person from the next. That way the story doesn't get modified because of all the witnesses. It is totally bogus to compare this to "chinese whispers" or the "telephone game" of passing on information. During genealogy research I confirmed a number of family legends which nobody knew when they first appeared. Plus a few other details never passed down about unwed mothers as an example.
Preach
you can travel a long way staying close to shore. making land and setting out again...traveling like this is common in the time before clocks and dead lines ....to keep on the move refreshes resources and moves people away from waste that piles up
A 14,000 years old settlement predates the Egyptians and Romans? Wow! Funny you have to mention that even.
Akhenaten's treasure was found, and the heavily-decorated sarcophagus wood was found to be 14,000 years old, also well-predating ancient Egypt or even Sumeria. Atlantean heirlooms. Perhaps that explains in part why there were giants here before the Heiltsuk arrived.
the roman were nothing more than a 2k year old war like barbarian tribe who took all its knowledge from the much older Greeks . the Greeks who took their knowledge from the much much older Egyptians and their ancient archives . which were nearly all destroyed by the first roman Christian zealots.
Other evidence shows that the sphinx is more than 12 000 yrs old due to the water erosion that shows her true age !
Spone Mr exactly!
Moreover it pre dates the Woolly Mamoth
Hello! I am a long-term head of archaeological excavations, dissertation student. I can complete an archaeological report, including drawings. I have a georadar and can work with it. Can I find a job in Canada not as a leader, but as part of a team? I can send my works and list of publications. Knowledge of English is average, but I can pull it up.
Everyone came from somewhere else. No one in Canada just appeared out of thin air, the native people traveled here too.
Canadian Girl Correction hun but all natives are a mix of European and Chinese as well as some other nations. We now now them as indigenous.
This is only if you still blindly accept the out of Africa migration theory which needs to be rewritten since the number of artifacts found since its publication leave it to be disproven even if mainstream old academics will not face it. Ignoring artifacts that show repeatedly people in the North American region were here long before current theory states is foolish.
umm u know people developed from bacteria and they could've developed from bacteria and became primal humans right?
Canadian Girl
So. What are u saying? That the aboriginal First Nations people have no claim to the land and the descendants of the white folks that stole their land (then slaughtered them, then made laws that classified them as the second class citizens they already treated them like, and killed their language and culture while simultaneously subjecting a majority of their children to sexually and physically abuse in the State Schools they were forced by law to attend) should feel absolutely no guilt about not stepping aside to donate some of it back? Are u saying what happened to the Natives was fair? Cuz they traveled here too? I really hope not. Cuz there is one glaring difference. The Natives actually discovered the land. Like in real life.
From what I read somewhere, the Natives immigrated here from South America. People move around. They always have. Was there someone here before the Natives? People have been invading and confiscating land since Lord knows how long. Maybe since man has been around. People always talk about the Indians because they are the most recent ones who were taken over. I'm sure there were others before them.
Remember the episode where they all got old, and McCoy kept saying "l am just a simple country doctor". Spock snapped back" l surmised as much." Logic verses humanity the same fight we all struggle with today. The frist Star Trek is the one l know the best. Spock's struggle with his human side was one of my favorite plot points. I watched Next Generation, 7of 9 was a female Spock taken to the extreme. Also the doctor hologram was a very interesting character, like you said. Are you a Dr Who fan too?
Nice age I agree withsome of what you said but it's still 2000 years after there were people knapping in well established quarry sites in Texas. I'm also glad you all are open to the hole boating to America idea as it would have been just as likely they hunted seals down the ice shelf from south west France and ran snack dab into the north American continent love me a good mystery
Snack dab? 😂 What is snack dab?
I went to an open public lecture with Parks Canada and associates in Victoria, BC in 2009. The photos are staged because the site is between the high and low tide line, making excavation incredibly difficult. In addition, two hour "waves" of black flies, mosquitos, no-see-ums, and other bugs make your day entertaining. That's why those artifact photos show that the pieces have been under water: the site IS under water.
why do you fail to mention Iberian Solutreans that were in North America 17,000+ years ago? ....
Because New York Times said, end of XIX Century,...
that in Filipinas Spaniards eat children.
I came from Monterrei,
Galicia, Spain....
I eat a child every morning !!!!
Because that's a fantasy with no evidence to back it up.
Because the video was about the finds on Triquet Island not about other locations.
This was about a specific dig not a story about all the various theories and hypothesis about the populating of the Americas.
@@aidanmagill6769 you should have stayed shut up before you said that. For there is tons of evidence to support it. But nevermind just do as you're told move long
Conjecture and speculation. Seals and sea lions rest on the land. Slow and fat, they're easy kills. Cruising the coastline in a canoe doesn't make you a sea fairing people. Still pretty interesting to find settlements from 14k years ago.
Hi! A couple of years or more ago did you hear before posting this that they revealed more data from the Cerutti Mastodon Site near San Diego, CA a site complete with stone items the ancient people used to kill it. It has been dated to 130,000 years ago. I wonder if like this site the real question hasn't been answered of whether or not it was a failed attempt to colonize North America. That's a key question I'd think, but only my amateur view. In this far northern area it would have been difficult to trek inland and inhabit where much farther south it would have been more conducive to migrating inland... but only my amateur view. Did you communicate with the Archaeologists at this site? Thanks for posting this interesting find!
You will probably never understand.
is Cerutti is old enough to be Erectus or Denisovan?
“...they demonstrate that oral history can be just as rooted in fact as any other type of record”
Especially if you hire Archeologists to "prove" your claims and then tell them how to "interpret" what they find!
Older than the pyramids, and even predates the Roman Empire, you say? 14k years predates Gobekli and pretty much everything else too.
So cool oral history is more than just wild stories bravo
maybe someone should break the hearts of the originators of this video and mention the 'solutrean hypothesis'.
exactly @zedheadful, Iberian Solutreans in North America 17,000+
indeed.
Excellent video, very cool music! Please keep it up.
Does it really matter, other than to science and people who want to discredit science because we don't have all the answers. We may never have all the answers but we were given a brain so we should use it.
Scientists need to stop being so narrow minded as if they look into old fable stories and myths were based on facts. When we truly open our eyes and thought patterns then maybe we'll find very shocking but true origin of humanity.
In 10 000 Years will somebody accidentally dig up my neighbours house and feel the fist inhabitants of my town were Chinese?
How many Chinese people are buried under the house do you think?
10,000 years ago how many first nations had a chinese neighbour Or a house?
Did they hav a take away
10,000 years ago the real first nations were already here when our local first nation imposters arrived; it's in all the legends across North America. The people were redheaded giants, like everywhere else. The local natives had a hard time killing them all off; it took thousands of years to get the upper hand.
Duncan Crow you guys are awesome. 👍
Yes! A number of people arrived along the coast of North America and arrived at more than one location. Also, evidence has been found that shows ancient people immigrated OUT of North America across the Bering land straight to what is now called Beringia. Archaeological evidence has been held and suppressed by archaeologists and privately funded institutions and the US and Canadian governments have had knowledge for a number of years about these facts.
People should know. People should understand. I’ve always wondered why this knowledge was suppressed and the answer is very simple. Fear. They are afraid of what will happen if people are allowed to know that North America in places now known as Canada and the United States is far more agent than we have been told Allie human beings were living here not only over 10,000 years ago but as far back as 20,000 years ago.
Possibly longer. We will wait and see if more evidence is uncovered. I recently found a small assemblage of ancient tools in South Carolina that suggests one localized area was inhabited for over 6000 years and up to 10,000 years… perhaps longer. With help from a morally upright archaeologists and a local tribe that still lives in the area hopefully this will be proven true in the history of this particular state as well as southeastern America will indeed be corrected.
The people who were here deserve that. A number of privately funded institutions are finally realizing that you can’t hold the tide back with a broom.
2+4=?
The Solutreans crossed the Atlantic to the East Coast of North America 20,000 years ago. Clovis point were developed in what is now Central France. Wake Up! The "First People from Asia" weren't here first. Cherokee oral history reveals that there were peoples living in the southeastern US when they arrived. The Cherokees killed them according to the oral history. There are ancient Western European DNA markers in many members of the Ojibwe as well.
I'm ojibway..I credit my European ancestry to my European relatives who came here in 1700s. I've always thought those Clovis points were iffy. I remember having a great instructor who had us discussing this. It seems that north American ancestors might have went to Europe rather than them coming here with those Clovis points.
Loretta Favel the evidence for the solutrean hypothesis is absolutely overwhelming at this point... but we will never hear about it bc it's not politically correct
Stop telling the truth. You're going to called a racist. Lol
I do love a bit of pseudo-history. Please tell me more.
Aidan Magill despite your condescending tone, he's actually not wrong. More and more evidence is being unearthed constantly that's proving the solutrean hypothesis correct.
I take issue with the "most scientists believe that Beringia was crossed during the last glacial maximum." I think it would be more correct to say that much evidence points to North American settlement by humans going back at least 18-20,000 years BP. That makes it a "so far" statement about settlement based on concrete evidence in hand, rather than a definitive statement about scientific consensus.
Some people think that the ancients were stupid. Lewis & Clark used rivers to go from St. Louis to the Pacific and used boats to do it. "Ancients" didn't travel through some open ice corridor. They used boats to go from Asia to North America. Like the Native Alaskans do today. Go for a walk in an ancient forest. You can't get through. Imagine going from Alaska to the Tip of South America through the jungle. They used boats. Wooden boats that no longer exist. They traveled on the rivers to go East. Just like the Europeans did when they came to Eastern North America. Those old timers weren't stupid. Just the people that believe that "theory" on how America was peopled.
The Northwest coast is warmed by the pacific currents just like Britain and Northwestern Europe is warmed by The Gulf Stream.
The unglaciated areas of northern North America would not have had forests. The climate was colder then (thus the ice age). The landscape would have been tundra. Large areas farther south, as is the case today, would be open prairies. Also ancient forests tend to be quite open under the canopy. What you see today does not represent the forests of the past. In addition there are a lot of people who have lived in jungles over the thousands of years and they seem to have travelled though them with relative ease.
Both routes, by ocean and land, likely are true.
The find does not suggest that an inland migration did not occur. It could have been a combination of migratory methods - moving along the coast in boats and moving by foot. Second, this find does not confirm some native myth as fact. There is no way in hell that such history could have been passed unchanged for 14,000 years to modern Indians who are unrelated to the people who made the camp 14,000 year ago. Its just coincidence. But of course, science is captive to politics and everyone knows that Indians are these super mystics who are capable of preserving lost history for 14,000 years.
Problem is with the Ice Free corridor is that for most of its existence, ~18K to 15K BCE, it was a biological wasteland Nothing grew there. It was only in the last 3000 years (14K to 11K bce) that there was any appreciable biomass. So how could people migrate along it.
www.history.com/news/new-study-refutes-theory-of-how-humans-populated-north-america
why should anyone be surprised by this? It is easy to travel along a coast, always keeping in sight of land and entering bays and inlets in search of a new home for those illegal immigrants!!!
A lot of people assume native oral history is myth, or that it's not accurate. However, the Hopi believe the same as the Sumerians did, which means despite the story being passed down so much, that story hasn't changed one bit. The Sumerians are long gone and the Hopi are still around today. Any native I've spoken with who is even slightly in touch with their roots, will tell you their people did NOT come here via any land bridge which we assume was there, whether it existed or not. The evidence found near Central America which is older than the land bridge evidence by thousands of years actually confirms this. Natives came over by boat, actually by ship if you'd believe it. This is more than plausible as Egyptians had ships at that time, made of grass, which they did travel on the oceans with, so no doubt other people also had ships.
"Ineresting!", as Spock would say.
Natasha Semrau Live long and prosper 🖖
Not to be picky but it was " fascinating" all though I do recall one episode where Mcoy told Spock that if he said the particular incident was " fascinating" he would lose it( I am paraphraseing here) and Spock responded "all though it wasn't fascinating it was however interesting". That may be the source of your confusion.
Sorry l didn't get my Spock quote right, long years of bull***** have turned my logic in mental fuzz. Everytime l hear backwards horse
Natasha Semrau Humans are most illogical 😁😁😁
sh** a piece of my brain oozes out my nasal cavity as bright green snot! Thank you for my nice warm fuzzy correction. I just love it when archaeology proves a new fact about how people started taking over Earth! You see my IQ is too low to be Steve Hawkings and not high enough to remember anything but Barbie dolls!!! Live long and prosper!
It’s interesting, but you can’t deny the facts in regard to migration over the Bering Strait land bridge. Horses and Camels are American based species that went the other way over the bridge before the water covered it. Paleo Indians hunted the megafauna class of animals to extinction, which included horses, camels, mammoths, giant beaver, and others. Aside from American bison, the only animals left were around 100-150 pound wild animals. In any case, they have connected Paleo and archaic and Woodland era movements across the Americas to Asians on the other side (Siberian peoples)
Oh great... a new branch of Peoplekind has been found in Canada - they be must related to Justin Trudeau?
Idiot
Bwahaha ! I got it!
Justin Trudeau is an idiot & a traitor to Canadian people & Canada... he seems to love his radical Muslim brotherhood way too much..when is he finally going to get voted out of office or maybe disappear for good, why won't he just move to the middle east
Justin Trudeau is a French Canadian Catholic. He doesn't love Muslims, he's just trying to pacify them!
canada has had imigration problems for centuries look at the chinese
We didn't "first arrive" we have Always Been Here... This is Our Homeland. Fact: When the so called Modern Man was just Starting to venture Out of Africa, we were Already Here. We are the Great Old Man of the World... The First. You call us Neanderthal. Neanderthal Originates in America. Period. - TPO
life all started hundreds of millions of years ago, and slowly evolved, and while evolving as all things had some sorts of common ancestors, it stands that early humans and like all creatures there were more than one kind of early human evolved worldwide at different rates, but worldwide just take religion out of the equation and common sense will win the day
5:50 How could the sea level be constant there and no where else? That makes NO sense.
We're still first nation native American people
Only you're not first and you're from non-native bloodlines.
Come to saddlelake Cree nation and say that to any Cardinal bud my family will gladly teach you other wise.. 😊 I have no reason to argue with an ignorant person about my people and the genocide that had happened to all native Americans or the injustice that goes on even now a days.. I personally am not hindered but anything have grown up and have moved off the reservation. Have a great job.make tons of money. Travel.. Have nice stuff.. And I grew up an orphan on the reservation.. How ever I am saddened at the state of my people and the youth.. And feel that as a nation we do need to come together before we are lost..i came from nothing and ask for nothing but try to give back and help my people.. I lost a baby sister to suicide... in your world just another statistic... in my world another wonderful human being.. But to answer you, yes as human beings we do have rights. and as the first ones it is our right. By birth or blood. As for these peace treaties there a joke and as for my people what's wrong with a nation of people asking for fairness and equality? For broken promises to fulfilled? I have to remember ww2 and what Germans did to the jews... But what about my people and what the world did to us??
Come to hobbema and say it to me and my family.. I think any Cardinal will gladly educate you on our history
I do apologize To be honest my comment was more pertaining to modern-day Academia and their definition of a Native American Aboriginal First Nations indigenous people based on the theory the modern person that has evolved from the caveman only existed few thousand years ago, although however I do believe that a people and a global civilization did and have existed before all of us prior the great flood and Do pre date us by possibly a million years or more who knows and have disappeared due to some Global catastrophe unknown, I don't know whether that correlates with the Bible or with aliens or with the Legends of old that have been passed down in different cultures and bliefs like Hinduism, Egyptians India and their teachings as well as in our own cultural teachings and legends and beliefs.. and how they all correlate and go together... So yes you are right that technically there are no First Nations Aboriginal people in a sense but yes there are cuz here we are it's our sense of pride makes us us 😁 cheers
I'm glad you know. I've just been through more research that points to early Siberian origins of many North American natives, as we know there are middle eastern origins for others, and of course the Shemsu Hor giants were everywhere. The tribes being mainly genetically unrelated to each other make it undecided who were really here first among the tribes. Need more data. I do believe in identity and even nationalism-light; people need a healthy sense of pride and purpose.
Finding a 10,000 yr old site is nothing new...40,000 yr old Clovis sites have already been found in the USA and I found a site that is a Neanderthal site in Idaho that is approx. 125,000 yrs old, but for some reason the smithsonian are not interested... probably because they didn't find it and I won't tell them the location because they are covering up our history and they won't give you credit for it anyway....Dennis Stanford(the head of the Smithsonian) wants all the credit himself...also a site was found back in the 1960s just south of the US border in Mexico that was dated to 250,000 yrs ago...
I LUV this kind of story. Science has become like a rigid religion. Almost all are closed minded.
More or less afraid what they might find . They wrote history from what they knew .....and they hide a lot from us .
It is a religion. All "science" is, is a way for our puny minds to try to comprehend the incomprehensible. Through the ages, that's all religion has ever been. Chronocentrism has a lot to do with it.
No because unlike religion, science is based on theories and tests. All able to be modified, or rejected as more information in learned. Religion is rigid and does not accept changes like science
trevor pierce I think science is more rigid than you think it is, or at least the people who deem what is acceptable are themselves are rigid, which turns out to be the same thing, and religion is more fluid than you think. If it doesn't fit one's beliefs, just create a new one. I guess science does the same thing though. Just as we have quantum mechanics now, with it's proponents and detractors. There's plenty of dogma to go around, and it's probably mostly bullshit. In 1000 years we will look very primitive, 1000 years after that.... so on and so forth.
Yes, but they need to find a skeleton proving those people of the past simply didn't pass story telling down to the next group moving into the area. That would be science.
That’s the same time of the settlement found near Austin, TX.
Too bad the indigenous people there if still existing are fully assimilated and no longer have their oral traditions
Well this goes to show who the land truly belongs too, and the rights to it.
Blake Doucette all the indian legends say that when the indians arrived in North America the first nations were giants, already here, and hard to get along with.
as if there is or ever was any doubt.......................
Assuming that humans could ever "own" any part of this planet is folly. We live, we die, someone else gets it... it's the original shell game.
Horse manure... Vikings and Scots made the trip over during the ice age from Europe to the east coast of Canada and America... Except their trip dates to a thousand [in some reported science belief to six thousand] years before this account in video of 14 thousand years ago... In other words this video helps prove they arrived later [over the Bering land bridge] than those who arrived on the North American Continents east coast... We are talking the Vikings and Scots arrived 15 to 20 thousand years ago... Well earlier than this reported 14 thousand years ago...
Sith'ari Azithoth,
Except that’s a complete lie, since Neanderthal fossils or even knowledge of them was never rooted in North America. Either you’re talking out of your ass, or repeating what some other dumbass said.
The Neanderthals were eventually slaughtered in multitudes by the darker skinned humans from the southern regions that are presently referred to as native Americans.
Who cares? I'm just glad to have electricity and flush toilets. And drive-thrus.
I agree!
Why is it so hard to believe people where always here and we did not come from one spot on earth.
"older than the Egyptian pyramids" I beg to differ.
If occupied for 7,000 years, it doesn't show migration... And there is no way that ocean levels changed all over the Earth due to ice sheet thawing and didn't effect that Island.
oceans rose 300 feet and in that part of BC the land rose 300 feet from glacial rebound. Calvert Island is another such place in BC
Now if they would just start consentrating on the "oral history" of the Hebrews & quit foo-fooing It as myth!
johnnie mcatee
They looked for that evidence when the Israeli's took the Sinai, they flooded hundreds of archaeologists into the Sinai, spent 20 years looking and found NOTHING, no million plus Hebrews wandering for 40 years, that WOULD have left a mark. They concluded that moses and the exodus was a complete fabrication.
And some of the historical events mentioned in the Pentatuch are verifiable but no evidence of floods, no evidence of parting seas and no evidence of any kind that there was a 'god' that told the Jews to commit the genocides, infanticide or any of the other atrocities mentioned there, the probability is that those events happened but none that shows a god made them do it.
rstevewarmorycom
Absolutely nothing written down by the Egyptians about an exodus of hundreds of thousands of "slaves" . The Egyptians were meticulous historians with 2 forms of writing.
Yup, the Egyptians never heard of them, even though the Egyptians ruled Canaan at the time!!!
oltedders -- No on-the-ground research work has been able to uncover any evidence of the exodus myth being true. People just bugged out from under the fallout as fast as they could, or died.
What's so earth-shattering about the idea of humans coming by boat? That has been going around for decades. Coming by boat is much faster than trudging along across frozen glaciers which may or may not support enough life to supply the bands of humans very long. Coming by sea makes a lot more sense. Also, archaeologists have been looking at the very distinct possibility that South America may have been peopled by seafarers as well. They have found evidence of human occupation dating long before bands of humans could have wondered down from North America, through Central America, and into South America.
Europeans living along the coast of Spain, France & Ireland were the first people to reach the Americas. However, once the Atlantic ice sheets melted, they were left isolated & eventually wiped-out or assimilated by Asians who migrated to N. America en' mass. Or, they just died out!
Savage Savant wrong look up Luzia woman. She's an 11,000 year old dark skinned native American.
Savage Savant Replace wiped out with genocide and demand financial compensation from the Invaders.
Until evidence is found to support that statement, it is absolute hogwash. And if you are referring to the Solutrean culture, no conclusive evidence has ever been found in North America that they made it here, just as there has never been evidence found that Neanderthal was ever here.
Pelagic sealing is a viable senario for any sea-going hunting culture, be it Siberian or Eroupean.
Well possibly partially true, is some disputed evidence that to suggest that Europeans came to North America thousands of years before the people of Siberia did and if true, probably all died out before they got here, so would of been devoid of humans. Plus Europeans then were dark skinned, not white.
It's obvious migration started from South America, probably coming from the pacific islands. The highest level of civilisation is found in South America and becomes more nomadic as we look northword. I would also say the migration was from North America to Northern Asia not the other accepted way around. South American culture was there before the end of the ice age and people moved northward as the ice receded; eventually crossing over to Northern Asia.
Science and religion don’t have it right and we will never know what really went on
but at least science is allowed to change and learn new information in order to develop the truth
Scientific conclusions and insights are the result of verifiable replicable data based on observation and measurement and peer reviewed, religion is a blind belief in a superior being and devoid of any supporting evidence, humans may never know exactly "what really went on", but I would rather accept conclusions based on facts as apposed to conclusions based faith.
Chris so right
One thing is the same we all try to explain our experiences the best way we know possible and make it known for generations to come
It is ridiculous to even compare science with religion. One is evidence based with an ongoing and unprecedented history of creating knowledge and new technology while the other is made up, rigid and based on naive superstition.
"Modern" people tend to forget what a dedicated hard working pioneering persevering person can do. Walk 20 miles a day for 200 straight days, spend 5 weeks on a raft or primitive canoe and with good winds and no typhoons sail 3,000 miles, etc. Or sail along hugging the coast. A rough life but lots of people at various times of course made journeys. Some survived, most did not
I believe Oral history over present HisStory
Don't politicise academics. When you do that you'll end up doing exactly what you're accusing them of doing, you'll mould it to fit your perception.
Oral history is myth wrapped in legend and facts. It's quite often difficult to know one from the other. So you treat it with open scepticism and use it as a guide not as fact. Pay no attention to the race baiter.
Nini Prom isgraaveforditmenssensamonmetflanciscolombardofispotchisnapolionalepoquecestlesystemestoujoursapresquelqueanneesarcheovandesertokceralionnecongoec
7charlierox
"suthjythsehdtjfkuilhio;p;iukfyjrhafQSrEFAFFGJVHKUIOI;HLJDYHSHTAdtjgkh;lhio;gulfilfliil"
Huh???
Oral history is ok as long as the story remains consistent but rarely does
his story has absolutely nothing to do with with gender
in spanish the word is historia
also his root ...male in spanish ?no...
its simply a coincidence in english
Leaves 1 big question, where did their journey begin...??? Or multiple sources???
Slow Poke what I want to know, is who are the ancestors of all these ancient people.
I hope the First Nation people win their land back.
Arguably it was the entire two continents. Are you going to abandon your home for the effort?
Melinda Atha its not their land. they can go back to Siberia(their homeland) if they choose.
ace love ~ Apparently you missed the part where it was proven they did not come from Siberia. They are the First Nation people, they were here as far as anyone knows now, since the beginning (so far). Getting "their" land back does not entail other people having to leave, but being given credit where credit is due, plus giving much needed land back that was taken by the government, rather than only having reservation land that was the "shit" land to the government to begin with.
Think about changing your name from ace love to ace ass!
Ree Noneya no. their ancestors/blood relatives still live in Siberia and Mongolia. DNA proves this, but we don't even need DNA you can us your own eyes. the first migrants made it all the way to south America and the last of the three waves of migrations made it all the way to Greenland. they are all Mongoliod peoples.
It has always been acknowledged that they are the original peoples of Canada.The name “Canada” likely comes from the Huron-Iroquois word “kanata,” meaning “village” or “settlement.” This discovery is just confirmation of what has always been theorized. They just had not found physical proof until now and we do use their oral histories to inform us on past events that predate written documentation and then look for physical evidence to confirm it which is exactly what happened here. They clearly state that they were directed to look in that area by the oral history of the people living in that area.
Not an ice age. We are in an ice age. It has being going on for abour 2.75m years with around 30 (depending on how you define them) cycles between glacial and interglacial periods. The recent glacial period which lasted from about 125,000 years ago when we were in the Eemain interglacial and until about 12.5 thousand years ago when the ice really started to melt is a glacial period, not an ice age.
Living on the coast would have been on a coast that is now under water. Artifacts found on the sea floor prove that. No t to mention that if the straight was above water then so were shore lines.
waterways have always been the most efficient transport available when it comes to moving goods and equipment. did anybody really believe people would explore a new world without being able to transport all the stuff they might need?
you think they would deliberately limit themselves to what they could carry on their backs when they could travel so much more if traveling by boat?
and the sea is rich in resources aiding in their journey as opposed to the land where there are fewer resources that were harder to catch or extremely limited resources at or crossing glaciers
~14,000 years ago the earth was in a notable warming period. Not quite as warm as today but everything would not have been encased in ice. Regardless, it still made sense to put your dwelling into the earth as it would have been warmer.
That has been my philosophy for years. The west coast was ice free and provided a small area for living quarters, food, and fishing. At the same time, on the east coast white Europeans, from southern Britain and France, were crossing the ice in search of food and came upon North America. They met in the Great Lakes area. The Ojibway tribe in Northern Ontario have evidence in their DNA of white/native interbreeding.
The Solutrean hypothesis on the peopling of the Americas states that the earliest human migration to the Americas took place from Europe, during the Last Glacial Maximum.
yep, exactly Bob. Iberian Solutreans 17,000+ years ago. Funny they fail to mention that in this 'political' video.
they probably failed to mention it because the hypothesis had been debunked.
phys.org/news/2016-01-genetic-ancient-trans-atlantic-migration-professor.html
🤡..🤣🤣
Not shocking. People make and use boats. The ocean going Polynesian people have been traveling the entire Pacific since forever. There are connections with Alaska to Hawaii and to New Zealand.
Julie Steimle: Peruvian DNA exists in the Polynesian people.
Auggies1956 DNA testing has traced Polynesian ancestry back to the original natives of Taiwan. However, more recent DNA testing also points to the Northern Philippines and possibly also to mainland China. There is also some Melanesian DNA in some Polynesians as well. I cannot find any link to Peruvian DNA in Polynesians.
Can water pouring down for 40 days melt big blocks ice that would have been there? What would have been the season there during the great flood and rain for 40 days?
Sea level constant for 15,000 years? They need a geologist or oceanographer on their team.
its common knowledge (tribal lore) that our ancestors were primarily seafarers. when i mention this, i get smirks and raised lips. sadly, the lore is nearly forgotten,
Topper site...way older. And others, as well. AND, YOU CANNOT CLAIM LAND RIGHTS just because your ancient ancestors MAY have inhabited said piece of land. Ridiculous.
Muslims can Muhammad said so.
What? Lol 😆
Travel by water is easyer than by wooded land
Also dodges giant bears, sabre tooth tigers .........