Cheers for doing this review. To be honest, I would make an assumption that most people will not shoot 8k, most people doing this, own a Red or dedicated cinema camera. I can confirm the 240fps is great. I have it in my R3 and it is 1080p. Absolutely a great image. It's really good if you shoot in a 60fps timeline, which I like to do for many projects. Although everyone says 24fps is cinematic! I don't like the stutter and soft image it produces. So, I like a higher base timeline. 😮 The other point is, I do believe camera tech has plateaued. The new cameras now are not seeing such a performance jump as we have seen over the last 5-10 years. Have a great day, great review!
Appreciate that my friend! Yep we’ve made some pretty big leaps in tech and so now refinements and intermediate steps are going to be the thing for a little while. Exciting times for creators! Appreciate you watching!
Just an idea... You mentioned, that you use a variable ND filter, which consists of two polarizer filters. Polarizer filters change color and contrast. By any accidental small change on the vND you change the image. It would be interesting to see results without the vND.
I love this because as a viewer that’s exactly how I would think too. Having done my undergrad in a science based field I’ll say this: this is definitely possible however not probable because I had the camera on a tripod and only manipulated the quality settings in the menu BUT I’m human and my memory isn’t perfect so definitely a valid point and reason for a potential future test!
@@davidjorozco Looking forward to it! A little time passed between the two shots. The brightness and angle of the sun must have changed a bit, which also changes the polarizing effect. By resizing the original 8K raw we might get aliasing, moire or other side effects, but the color and contrast should not change. At least, that's what I think.
id love to see a comparison of the 4k60 sraw vs the hevc 4k60. I believe both are line skipped, wondering how much processing is going on with the hevc. maybe vs the 8k60 raw lite too.
It does not at all. Both 8k raw & 4k s raw use the exact same percentage of the sensor (100% of the horizontal length & 79.1% of the vertical length of the sensor) which is pretty cool I think!
Shout out to Scott for pointing this out!
Awesome, thanks, glad it helped!
Cheers for doing this review. To be honest, I would make an assumption that most people will not shoot 8k, most people doing this, own a Red or dedicated cinema camera. I can confirm the 240fps is great. I have it in my R3 and it is 1080p. Absolutely a great image. It's really good if you shoot in a 60fps timeline, which I like to do for many projects.
Although everyone says 24fps is cinematic! I don't like the stutter and soft image it produces. So, I like a higher base timeline. 😮
The other point is, I do believe camera tech has plateaued. The new cameras now are not seeing such a performance jump as we have seen over the last 5-10 years.
Have a great day, great review!
Appreciate that my friend!
Yep we’ve made some pretty big leaps in tech and so now refinements and intermediate steps are going to be the thing for a little while. Exciting times for creators! Appreciate you watching!
Great video!
Appreciate the watch!
Just an idea... You mentioned, that you use a variable ND filter, which consists of two polarizer filters. Polarizer filters change color and contrast. By any accidental small change on the vND you change the image. It would be interesting to see results without the vND.
I love this because as a viewer that’s exactly how I would think too. Having done my undergrad in a science based field I’ll say this: this is definitely possible however not probable because I had the camera on a tripod and only manipulated the quality settings in the menu BUT I’m human and my memory isn’t perfect so definitely a valid point and reason for a potential future test!
@@davidjorozco Looking forward to it! A little time passed between the two shots. The brightness and angle of the sun must have changed a bit, which also changes the polarizing effect. By resizing the original 8K raw we might get aliasing, moire or other side effects, but the color and contrast should not change. At least, that's what I think.
Great video
Thanks for sharing and being transparent
Appreciate the attention to detail.
Appreciate that friend 🙏
Thank you for the footage! You've got my sub
Thank you for that my friend 🙏
I avoided the mistake full stop and didn't by an R5 II, a camera that costs $800 more than an equally/more capable Nikon Z8 or marginally better R5.
The Nikon is Equally capable except for autofocus.
id love to see a comparison of the 4k60 sraw vs the hevc 4k60. I believe both are line skipped, wondering how much processing is going on with the hevc. maybe vs the 8k60 raw lite too.
Love it!
Appreciate you dude!
does the 4k sraw crop in the sensor?
It does not at all. Both 8k raw & 4k s raw use the exact same percentage of the sensor (100% of the horizontal length & 79.1% of the vertical length of the sensor) which is pretty cool I think!