By the time CFC's we're identified as a problem their patents had expired. Manufacturing had shifted from the big chemical companies to small low cost/low profit companies. The politically powerful big companies had no interest in keeping CFC's and the small manufacturers had no political power. A shift to the new type of refrigerant, HFC's, would be profitable for the big, politically powerful companies. This is how there was the political impetus to switch. Now that HFC's have been identified as greenhouse gasses, and their patent protection has expired, the big, politically powerful manufacturers have new (profitable) refrigerants to replace them. Don't expect there to be the political will to do significant change from hydrocarbons to renewables until the politically powerful can make profit.
Karla Berger, we mainly used 2 refrigerants in the USAfrom the early 1950s until the early 1990s (replacing methyl methanoate, a highly flammable and poisonous compound), R12 A.K.A. dichlorodifluoromethane (used in automobiles and refrigerators mainly) and R22 A.K.A Chlorodifluoromethane, (used in household and commercial AC units mainly and in aerosol cans as the propellant), there were other refrigerants and other uses but those were the main culprits for CFC in the refrigerant industry in the USA, they were mainly used because they were relatively safe for consumers (being non flammable) and cheap to manufacture. They were replaced with more costly and generally extremely flammable volatile hydrocarbons, typically propane, n-butane and isobutane. Dimethyl ether (DME) and methyl ethyl ether are also used which ironically emit just as much Co² as CFC's did (unlike what Trace clams in this clearly left leaning libtarded video) because they are literally hydrocarbon molecular chains. Gary is right the patients on R12 and R22 "Freon" which is a DuPont brand names not an actual gas name (as I wrote the names of above) ran out decades ago. Free market enterprise economy creates jobs and technology you can see this today as DuPont is phasing out R134 tetrafluoroethane for Tetrafluoropropene HFO 1234yf because it s lower in CO² production and has a valid patent. It has nothing to do with the Paris climate agreement that we are no longer part of but a better "freon" that makes less CO² emissions, that everyone in the world will have to buy off of DuPont to meet these unrealistic climate goals (that I will bet money not a single large economy nation [France, Germany are examples] will be able to meet, but that is opinion not fact).
Maybe if you just nurtured a relationship with a cfc instead of just hooking up with it and throwing it away when the first UV ray comes along, maybe they wouldn't feel the need to tear molecular families apart, hm? Upper atmospheric hookup culture is to blame!
President Trump also doesn't care about arts, he just massively defunded them. Oh shit, now they will now need to provide content that is worthy of donations and is not funded by force. Oh shit, now they will need to improve themselves and make more interesting content than lazy rehashed uninteresting brainded propaganda. What a fucking tragedy
This is why im not ultimately too worried. Cause if history has taught us anything, it's that humans have a history of getting their shit together when it hits the fan. Should it be that way? Probably not, but hey it is what it is.
I love this guy, he always makes science ten times more interesting plus he's funny af. Unlike the others they're boring and they can't keep my attention on them.
Corporations. That's why. Corporations fund both politicians and surveys. That's why i don't buy into the whole "petrol cars are bad, electric cars are good but 5 times more expensive". Give me a break, if they really care about environment they would invest in public transportation and walking or riding bikes. Same as "meat is bad, so you should buy this vegan product that costs 10 times more".
Aro Man, what is hateful? The character Biff from Back to the Future was based on Donald Trump www.theguardian.com/film/2015/oct/23/back-to-the-future-writer-bad-guy-biff-was-based-on-donald-trump .
Did you actually read the Paris Agreement and how specific it is one why the US is the only one being told to pay for the aid on the agreement while China and India specifically don’t have to deal with paying their part with less consequences? If this agreement is a benefit to all nations, why is it that only the US is to pay for the research and development of plans to reduce CO2 emissions? And don’t give me that because we’re the riches country argument, if this is a joint effort, US shouldn’t be paying for this alone. That’s why we stepped out of the agreement because it wasn’t a fair agreement.
that's why i believe that we need a reality clause : if a politician holds a position that contradicts scientific facts and makes policy based on those opinions then that politician should be kicked out of office regardless of the office they hold
That sounds problematic, though, as it's open to abuse. It's our responsibility not to vote a candidate that distrusts science. Even now, there are scientists that is paid to research an (probably fake) evidence of the absence of global warming. When your clause is implemented, this illegal activity will only increase.
If I watch UA-cam videos til 6 to 7 am do I have a problem? I mean sleeping wise as long as I get 8 to 9 hours I feel perfectly fine. I don't get tired no signs at all. I do feel my brain gravitating towards entertainment but I'm not seeing any negative signs.
The main problem is the people dont understand how those adversarial actions affect the environment and only take notice when the whole world is almost doom.
Fake News with zero backing empirical evidence that can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that we had any affect on the ozone layer. Nothing more than a click bait title and a man rambling off some quasi intellectual scientific observations without ever reaching a true conclusion that backs the click bait title. The willfully ignorant are the only idiots that consider this tabloid fake news video to have any merit. LOL
You're a complete idiot. You are the flat earther. If Seeker told you the earth was flat you are the sort of idiotic sheep that would accept it as fact. It's called science and research kid try it some time instead of being a willfully ignorant sheep with no argument aside from childish insults like calling people flat earthers.
Climate change is a process that has occurred over billions of years since the earth came into existence. I think you are confused no one has ever made that claim nor did I child. Your weak non argument sidestepping and attempts at mental gymnastics to get around the fact that there is zero provable evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt that humans have repaired the ozone layer or damaged the ozone layer is laughable. The burden of proof is always upon the party or person making the claims, so therefore unless you can right now create a perfect emulation of our planet in a global sized experiment that spans decades to the stretch of centuries which can provide viable empirical evidence to even remotely prove any negligible amount of gases from human activity were some how magically able to damage the ozone layer or lack there of these insignificant amounts of gases were able to reverse a hole in the ozone layer and repair it over the span of several decades directly caused by human activity despite volcanic activity ( i.e. natural causes) being the major contributing factor with humans having over the past 250 years contributed just one part of CO2 in 10,000 to the atmosphere. One volcanic cough can do this in a day. That's 0.01% percentile or 1/10,000 for human gas contribution in CO2. If your simple mind can comprehend all this then come back and talk to me. You have no argument.
Seriously, the passive-aggressive tone referring to America is just petty and annoying. If you want to single something out, just do it outright, it makes you sound less of an ass. I'm not disagreeing or trying to be controversial, just please be direct in implications, not falsely subtle. When you do that, but it's a subject on which everyone is immediately clear on what you're talking about, it's not clever, it just sounds boorish.
If he had said it outright... he would have stated the fact that the US didn't want to sign on. That's a thing that happened. By pretending to be subtle about it, he just sounds like a kid on a playground pretending not to directly talk about someone behind their back, and just comes off pretentious and dickish.
Rhetoric at its finest? So pretending you're not directly talking about someone behind their back like a kid on a playground instead of just plainly stating that a country didn't sign an agreement is rhetoric at its finest? Aristotle sure would be proud, huh?
Government all over the world should make rule to plant at least one tree or small plant in each an every home .this will lead control temperature growth
im pretty everyone knows meat is bad for the enviroment. its just that people eat meat anyway. i only buy meat when its about to expire in the supermarket 20 min before the store closes. but im sure that still counts as supporting the meat industry.
Everyone knows this and its a issue tht is near impossible to solve without decades of easing it in. Without meat then we will an even worse epidemic of hunger. So will we stop making meat at the expense of killing off a good portion of our population or will we continue producing meat at the expense of the environment? Either option is bad with the latter being the lesser of 2 evils but ppl are naturally scared of death bc we're animals too (instincts), so we wuld end up choosing the former. So pretty much nothing we can do b4 the point of no return comes.
Because it's a fraud. The holes are natural to Earth and fluctuate as the Earth spins. We all want to love our planet but be careful, many people are making money off this love and use words to tug on your heart like, MAYBE, MIGHT, COULD and IF... These are trick words to manipulate people who do not think but follow because of love.
I think the government should allow scientists to observe and research every companies new product, and if it’s dangerous to the environment, it’s not allowed to be produced.
And then what? You create a big and onipotent monopoly!! Great!! And what more? Huh what more? You rise prices because now every product is being under study! Not to mention the lack of liberty as now the government has the right to intervenue with private businesses! And the cherry on the cake: We'll have nothing being allowed to produce at all because every single atom has to come from somewhere, and that somewhere will always be nature! Great, you're a genius!
You could mention the way in which ozone captures UV-light, but it'd probably screw your smartass "politicians i'm not daring to address by name are ruining the atmosphere, because they can"-routine. For those of you who skipped chemistry for sociology -- ozone is an unstable substance, that created when a loose oxygen atom meets O2 molecule with consumption of a UV-photon, after some time it breaks down to O + O2 with extra energy dissipating as a heat. Yep chlorine is affecting this balance, but more air is UV-exposed the more ozone is created.
Perhaps you shouldn't have left out an ozone 'hole' is one in which a region of ozone falls below 220 dobson units. Naturally ozone levels drop above this threshold in polar winters when no Sun is shinning on that region. Due to ODSs ozone levels continue to drop past the 220 DU threshold forming a 'hole'. If you want to call out others on their science you better make sure to get yours correct.
Banning refrigeration gases always takes a while. There's been R22 and R23 about 15-20yrs ago, those were the 2 main gases used. A lot of countries agreed on getting rid of it because of their devastating effect on the ozone layer, but for another 5 to 10 years you were allowed to refill it in already existing systems but not to use fill new ones with it. After that period of time you had to change gases and for that you had to change the sealing gasket where it was possible (solenoid valves for example) otherwise it would happen pretty fast for those gaskets to get a leakage. But even changing the sealing gaskets wasn't the solution. Still most of the system where they were changed were leaking after months or a few years. Same thing is now happening with R404a. The prices already rose extraordinarily high this year. However there are more more systems (especially supermarkets) built containing R744 as a refrigerant, which is nothing else but CO2 and not as bad for the enivronment as the other gases. For example 3kg R404 has a CO2 equivalent of 11 metric tons of CO2. However CO2 is running with a much higher pressure which makes construction costs higher due to more safety devices required like gas warners in cold rooms, high pressure release valves on every compressor, thicker copper tubes and so on. Cause yeah, you dont normally run above 30bars with 1,5mm wall thickness of the tube. For higher pressures you use a thicker tube and the high pressure required isn't to joke with. On the suction side you have around 25 bars compared to 2 bars with R404a (depends on the required suction gas temp, the deeper you want your temperatur the less of pressure you have).
It _does_ sound familiar. It's the same thing that is happening _right now_ with *animal agriculture* -- the largest human-made environmental catastrophe in the history of our species, very well known, and virtually not talked about. #govegan
Purple Turtle you don't even have to kill nor use animals tale a couple hundred cells and you can make indefinitely meat with no deaths, isn't that your dream as vegans?
As if in the history of the Earth there has never been a period where organisms created more methane or carbon dihidroxyde than we have today? I don't know, and I doubt anyone does. From quick Google searches I've read that the percentage of C2O in the captured (frozen air) was the same as today. Global warming is a scam. It's just corporations invested in batteries and solar panels, and now they need someone to buy them. Same with food. Corporations need consumers for their overpriced "vegan/gluten free" food.
jack ripper Nahh. You’re missing the details bro. Take the level of CO2 over the previous decades and you’ll see a massive spike. That’s what’s causing the big discussion on climate change. As for the vegan/gluten part I feel going vegetarian wouldn’t hurt. Plus gluten is bad for you :/
when you said CFC and aerosol cans I thought about the DuPont Monopoly in patents there's reasons why there is not an ozone in the Southern and Northern hemispheres of this planet you do need sunlight to create naturally occurring ozone. but I forgot the world was flat in the sun's always there because we're stuck under the dome maybe that's the reason. For god sakes how come we don't pay carbon tax we could have saved the planet by now raise those taxes save the planet.
vincent schuurhof he was praising him for not being political about global warming. Global warming by itself isn't political but the disagreements behind it is.
Crimson King you can’t ignore the fact that one of the biggest greenhouse emitting countries aren’t signed in because of Trump. He is literally the reason we aren’t in. It’s not a surprise and they aren’t at fault for “mentioning” him
China has 1,3 billion people and the US has 300 million... Still the US is emitting more than half the amount carbon dioxide that China is. The only problem at this point is the US and the stupid people who live there.
and china is pulling a huge effort to fight global warming: reforestation on a massive scale (they will reach the 2030 target in 2020), its now the largest producer of solar power , the only nation focused on developing Thorium MSR ...and the list goes on
"In the East, it could be the COLDEST New Year’s Eve on record. Perhaps we could use a little bit of that good old Global Warming that our Country, but not other countries, was going to pay TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS to protect against. Bundle up!" 7:01 PM - Dec 28, 2017 tweets the moron-in-chief
This video is very "misleading". You showed data from 1985 from September to October. Later on you showed data from July 2017. I check both years on NASA page, on the same month and I found no difference at all, contradicting the statement you said that the Ozone Layer is healing.
it sounds like we have to do this if we want to protect our ozone, dunno why this is debatable, if we have to phase out specific chemicals thats just what we have to adjust to.
We have to recreate ozone layer synthetically and release it to the atmosphere. Is it doable, though? Last time I heard, O3 cannot be synthesized. I'm only a regular person with ideas, but no knowledge of chemistry.
Cahidi Joyo Raharjo well ozone is actually harmful to us to breathe....its smog in big cities so "creating it" at the surface level isn't really smart.
As a US Citizen, I apologize for our embarrassment of a "president" who probably couldn't even pass a 4th grade science class. Please don't forget that the majority of us actually voted for someone else, and our uneducated masses just did a great job screwing our country.
So leaving the Paris agreement, is pretty much for big companies to do whatever they want. Creating more factories is more jobs, but at the expense for a healthy planet for future generations. The only ppl to blame is yourself america.
There should not be anymore conventions and agreements untill and unless all the 197 countries show certain effects and results. In my nation the prices of airconditoners having HFC R410 and CFC R22 are significantly different. Most people will opt cheaper. Only legislations wont suffice the humanity execution will. Everyone must do their part
The difference between the Ozone and the Man-made Climate change Arguments is simple there is no a consensus among all Climate Scientists that a warmer climate would cause a doomsday scenario as many climate change alarmists predict and the computer-generated climate models in the last 20 years have failed to accurately confirm the predicted changes in climate over that period. The proposed solutions to cut carbon emissions with Carbon credits and Carbon Taxes will cost Trillions of US Dollars and is predicted to have a negligible impact on lowering temperatures by the year 2100. Stopping the use of CFCs over the last 40-50 years have resulted in the hole in the Ozone layer to shrink. Spray cans, refrigerators, and Aircons can be designed to use alternative refrigerants instead of CFC'sand still be economical, replacing fossil fuels, on the other hand, is a lot harder to do as Hydro, Wind, and Solar power generation is currently still too expensive and unreliable.
how it all happened.. *World starts ending* Industry: "It's not our fault" *Science proves industry is to blame, Vienna Conventions passed* Industry: "Fine we'll sign it, but you have to reimburse our lost income."
The 70's seems to have been the last time the USA had something approaching government for the people. Reagan's 'new morning in America' brought deregulation, the decline of journalism, and Milton Friedman's failed neoliberal economics. It was not a dawn but twilight.
i've seen the latest stats of global emissions regarding CO2 and CH4... it doesnt look good and we will lose most if not all glaciers before this problem is fixed (if it is fixed that in the first place) Not to mention the global temperature increase (currently it sits at 0.99 °C) and the fear of reaching 1.5 °C which would create chaos and kill countless plant species which would in turn kill animal species and so on im not trying to make you people depressed and throw everything out of your hands now but stuff like this needs to be repeated over and over just like the subject for the ozone layer was
*THE SUN IS A DEADLY LAZER*
Lol
we must destroy the sun then!
*not anymore there is a blanket*
*Never mind the blanket is gone*
True. That's why we need an ozone blanket 😂
By the time CFC's we're identified as a problem their patents had expired. Manufacturing had shifted from the big chemical companies to small low cost/low profit companies. The politically powerful big companies had no interest in keeping CFC's and the small manufacturers had no political power. A shift to the new type of refrigerant, HFC's, would be profitable for the big, politically powerful companies. This is how there was the political impetus to switch. Now that HFC's have been identified as greenhouse gasses, and their patent protection has expired, the big, politically powerful manufacturers have new (profitable) refrigerants to replace them. Don't expect there to be the political will to do significant change from hydrocarbons to renewables until the politically powerful can make profit.
Funny how every refrigerant was fine until the patents expired..?
Karla Berger, we mainly used 2 refrigerants in the USAfrom the early 1950s until the early 1990s (replacing methyl methanoate, a highly flammable and poisonous compound), R12 A.K.A. dichlorodifluoromethane (used in automobiles and refrigerators mainly) and R22 A.K.A Chlorodifluoromethane, (used in household and commercial AC units mainly and in aerosol cans as the propellant), there were other refrigerants and other uses but those were the main culprits for CFC in the refrigerant industry in the USA, they were mainly used because they were relatively safe for consumers (being non flammable) and cheap to manufacture. They were replaced with more costly and generally extremely flammable volatile hydrocarbons, typically propane, n-butane and isobutane. Dimethyl ether (DME) and methyl ethyl ether are also used which ironically emit just as much Co² as CFC's did (unlike what Trace clams in this clearly left leaning libtarded video) because they are literally hydrocarbon molecular chains. Gary is right the patients on R12 and R22 "Freon" which is a DuPont brand names not an actual gas name (as I wrote the names of above) ran out decades ago. Free market enterprise economy creates jobs and technology you can see this today as DuPont is phasing out R134 tetrafluoroethane for Tetrafluoropropene HFO 1234yf because it s lower in CO² production and has a valid patent. It has nothing to do with the Paris climate agreement that we are no longer part of but a better "freon" that makes less CO² emissions, that everyone in the world will have to buy off of DuPont to meet these unrealistic climate goals (that I will bet money not a single large economy nation [France, Germany are examples] will be able to meet, but that is opinion not fact).
@@oilsandmore yes this was precisely why DuPont did this. To force everyone to buy their new product.
Maybe if you just nurtured a relationship with a cfc instead of just hooking up with it and throwing it away when the first UV ray comes along, maybe they wouldn't feel the need to tear molecular families apart, hm? Upper atmospheric hookup culture is to blame!
New Message this made my day
New Message reply me so I can have a laugh
New Message cute. But amophasizing a cfc doesn't help the problem.
Neither does stepping on every joke you see.. but keep it up. Everybody loves 'THAT GUY'. You must get invited to all the best parties.
M8, he wasn't _amophasizing_ shit.
Nice bashing on a certain person without naming it.
donald trump dosent care about science nor the planet in any way whatsoever. thats a valid reason for bashing him.
vincent schuurhof This is how he works. Controversial guy who's all about the business
President Trump also doesn't care about arts, he just massively defunded them. Oh shit, now they will now need to provide content that is worthy of donations and is not funded by force. Oh shit, now they will need to improve themselves and make more interesting content than lazy rehashed uninteresting brainded propaganda. What a fucking tragedy
Trump is a hick and a scumbag who believes in pseudoscience made by oil companies.
If the shoe fits...
"i think death is impossible" *starts ignoring people who are dying*
SlothInSpace OTHERS will die. You just never will
Humans had to be convinced the hard way the sewage and drinking water don't mix, not surprising that those events had to take place.
This is why im not ultimately too worried. Cause if history has taught us anything, it's that humans have a history of getting their shit together when it hits the fan. Should it be that way? Probably not, but hey it is what it is.
InMaTeofDeath in most of the third world people are still struggling with this
and the dangers of lead, over and over and over again
well explained as always.......keep it up
That glasses looks good on you
Tech Era
I can finally distinguish him from Mark Ruffalo 🤣
The hair doesn't
Wait for Trace’s Next Sponsor,
Hes going to be like Curious Droid.
“These Frames were brought to you by ...”
Jack lack headass
Those*
I love this guy, he always makes science ten times more interesting plus he's funny af. Unlike the others they're boring and they can't keep my attention on them.
Totally true
Thumbed downed this so hard
The last time anyone on seeker was funny was anal hair
What did he say that was so funny?
Never understood why science is political.
It's not.
It’s not. Retards in America make it political
Sciencie is not political. But the only ones who have the power to stop climate change are the ones who rule.
Corporations. That's why. Corporations fund both politicians and surveys.
That's why i don't buy into the whole "petrol cars are bad, electric cars are good but 5 times more expensive".
Give me a break, if they really care about environment they would invest in public transportation and walking or riding bikes.
Same as "meat is bad, so you should buy this vegan product that costs 10 times more".
It takes money to produce scientific research. Politicians want to control money. That’s why.
Just think about AIDS research.
Someone please send this vid to "biff" a.k.a. president Trump
tar pit why are you such a hateful individual
what?
Aro Man, what is hateful? The character Biff from Back to the Future was based on Donald Trump www.theguardian.com/film/2015/oct/23/back-to-the-future-writer-bad-guy-biff-was-based-on-donald-trump .
tar pit he does look like a bully from the 80s. Lolol
I wasn't trying to be malicious.....just a harmless joke guys
Did you actually read the Paris Agreement and how specific it is one why the US is the only one being told to pay for the aid on the agreement while China and India specifically don’t have to deal with paying their part with less consequences? If this agreement is a benefit to all nations, why is it that only the US is to pay for the research and development of plans to reduce CO2 emissions? And don’t give me that because we’re the riches country argument, if this is a joint effort, US shouldn’t be paying for this alone. That’s why we stepped out of the agreement because it wasn’t a fair agreement.
How does my deadly farts affect the Ozone Layer?
need a quick critical answer, because we might be in danger, should I conserve it...
Mr. Omen just hold it in till you splode
Unless you're farting out complex chlorine molecules, you should be fine to let her rip. Don't drink bleach.
"Contributing to the problem"
But not causing the problem. Got it.
that's why i believe that we need a reality clause : if a politician holds a position that contradicts scientific facts and makes policy based on those opinions then that politician should be kicked out of office regardless of the office they hold
That sounds problematic, though, as it's open to abuse. It's our responsibility not to vote a candidate that distrusts science.
Even now, there are scientists that is paid to research an (probably fake) evidence of the absence of global warming. When your clause is implemented, this illegal activity will only increase.
Net neutrality
Nitish Anand what
seeker should make a video about Net neutrality
*Nut neutrality*
The gamer with a bad Name
🅱️UT 🅱️UETRALITY
+Kard Gamer tryhard
There are already electric planes.
they kinda suck atm tho and planes dont really pollute all that much. focusing on cars and power plants is probably the better choice atm
All we need to make everyone take the environment seriously is to create and spam more Earth Chan memes! People respect Earth Chan’s wishes.
VIVE MONTREAL TABARNACK
patdus11 mdr jpensais la meme chose 😂
Ahaha
_We actually fixed it with legislation_
Push X to doubt.
If I watch UA-cam videos til 6 to 7 am do I have a problem? I mean sleeping wise as long as I get 8 to 9 hours I feel perfectly fine. I don't get tired no signs at all. I do feel my brain gravitating towards entertainment but I'm not seeing any negative signs.
Danielmeir what a random comment
Too much to learn,
Not enough night to do it all.
When you start to hear the birds chirping thats when you’re in trouble.
Danielmeir . You'll be fine.
time is all you make it to be
Not good. Trust me. It seems like Phase Delay Syndrome, and it can be devastating. Try going to bed and waking up slightly earlier each day
The main problem is the people dont understand how those adversarial actions affect the environment and only take notice when the whole world is almost doom.
This is totally
True news.
Fake News with zero backing empirical evidence that can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that we had any affect on the ozone layer. Nothing more than a click bait title and a man rambling off some quasi intellectual scientific observations without ever reaching a true conclusion that backs the click bait title. The willfully ignorant are the only idiots that consider this tabloid fake news video to have any merit. LOL
Whatever helps you sleep at night, flat earther.
You're a complete idiot. You are the flat earther. If Seeker told you the earth was flat you are the sort of idiotic sheep that would accept it as fact. It's called science and research kid try it some time instead of being a willfully ignorant sheep with no argument aside from childish insults like calling people flat earthers.
Care to cite the science and research you claim disproves climate change? Or are you just interested in using childish insults?
Climate change is a process that has occurred over billions of years since the earth came into existence. I think you are confused no one has ever made that claim nor did I child.
Your weak non argument sidestepping and attempts at mental gymnastics to get around the fact that there is zero provable evidence beyond a shadow of a doubt that humans have repaired the ozone layer or damaged the ozone layer is laughable.
The burden of proof is always upon the party or person making the claims, so therefore unless you can right now create a perfect emulation of our planet in a global sized experiment that spans decades to the stretch of centuries which can provide viable empirical evidence to even remotely prove any negligible amount of gases from human activity were some how magically able to damage the ozone layer or lack there of these insignificant amounts of gases were able to reverse a hole in the ozone layer and repair it over the span of several decades directly caused by human activity despite volcanic activity ( i.e. natural causes) being the major contributing factor with humans having over the past 250 years contributed just one part of CO2 in 10,000 to the atmosphere. One volcanic cough can do this in a day. That's 0.01% percentile or 1/10,000 for human gas contribution in CO2. If your simple mind can comprehend all this then come back and talk to me.
You have no argument.
I love how he called the US out for pulling out of the Paris Agreement
Seeker was doomed, until Dnews stepped away from power.
Catwow they were actually doomed when they told Hitler is famous in India. Then survived by making video on indian economy
Keith Durant they did mention tht Hitler ideology is vastly followed. But truth is hardly anybody know who the guy is.
Counter point emissions in the u.s. are decreasing mostly from factories closing not regulations.
Seriously, the passive-aggressive tone referring to America is just petty and annoying. If you want to single something out, just do it outright, it makes you sound less of an ass.
I'm not disagreeing or trying to be controversial, just please be direct in implications, not falsely subtle. When you do that, but it's a subject on which everyone is immediately clear on what you're talking about, it's not clever, it just sounds boorish.
Micah Philson tbh I really wanted to like the video, but these references to the US really annoyed me.
It kinda sounds childish, if you ask me.
Kemo III Its not childish its true. Rhetoric at its finest
If he had said it outright , you'd still complain.
If he had said it outright... he would have stated the fact that the US didn't want to sign on. That's a thing that happened.
By pretending to be subtle about it, he just sounds like a kid on a playground pretending not to directly talk about someone behind their back, and just comes off pretentious and dickish.
Rhetoric at its finest? So pretending you're not directly talking about someone behind their back like a kid on a playground instead of just plainly stating that a country didn't sign an agreement is rhetoric at its finest?
Aristotle sure would be proud, huh?
Noooooo!
The sun is a deadly lazer
Not anymore there's a blanket!
Wow, the things we can achieve together
Moamin Aljaro take a closer look at what happened. Hint: this has nothing to do with politics or the Montreal protocol.
Government all over the world should make rule to plant at least one tree or small plant in each an every home .this will lead control temperature growth
huh look at that. A seeker video that ends on a hopeful note, will wonders never cease?
"If you didn't see the problem, there isn't one"
I did a report on this in high school... 15 years ago
The Paris Agreement wanted literally a trillion dollars.
Now we just have eliminate benzene and nitrous oxides - that'll be when electric vehicles become predominant.
kd1s ...and how long do you want to wait for that?
LOL
Well I give it 10 to 20 years before internal combustion engines disappear.
kd1s I hope you're right.
It truly breaks my heart as an American to see the country I live in not take these matters seriously.
Today we have the same issue with the meat industry denying that their production is devastating towards the envirnoment.
Who are denying it? In Denmark we are well aware of this issue but it's a very tough issue to tackle.
im pretty everyone knows meat is bad for the enviroment. its just that people eat meat anyway.
i only buy meat when its about to expire in the supermarket 20 min before the store closes. but im sure that still counts as supporting the meat industry.
Everyone knows this and its a issue tht is near impossible to solve without decades of easing it in. Without meat then we will an even worse epidemic of hunger. So will we stop making meat at the expense of killing off a good portion of our population or will we continue producing meat at the expense of the environment? Either option is bad with the latter being the lesser of 2 evils but ppl are naturally scared of death bc we're animals too (instincts), so we wuld end up choosing the former. So pretty much nothing we can do b4 the point of no return comes.
The o zone layer. Did we all forget?
Did it boost our destructive confidence?
Why the hole in the Ozon layer is only at the poles........why not anywhere over the glob.......
Abinash Pal ozone is thinner at the likes
Don't post skeptic comments if you can't say it right
Because it's a fraud. The holes are natural to Earth and fluctuate as the Earth spins. We all want to love our planet but be careful, many people are making money off this love and use words to tug on your heart like, MAYBE, MIGHT, COULD and IF... These are trick words to manipulate people who do not think but follow because of love.
GenX Autrucity
We got another one.
Trump would unlike this even before watching it.
The how ozone layer is made, I want to know about it. Buddy
pandya ravi wut
pandya ravi O2---by the action of uv------->O+O
O2+O------->O3
THEN ALL THESE OZONE MOLECULES FORM A GROUP AND EVENTUALLY A BARRIER
This is what you can accomplish when you actually listen to scientists.
Aaaaaand now we're going back the other way because pretty much every country is pulling out.
LycanDragon the other is in a civil war
Takemikazuchi still somehow he still got her pregnant....
LycanDragon classic american citizen that think his country is the only one out there and they are the center of the universe
Even North Korea! North Korea dude. they even join the paris agreement.
Muhammad Hadrami ikr, North Korea and South Korea finally have a same thinking!
I think the government should allow scientists to observe and research every companies new product, and if it’s dangerous to the environment, it’s not allowed to be produced.
And then what? You create a big and onipotent monopoly!! Great!! And what more? Huh what more? You rise prices because now every product is being under study! Not to mention the lack of liberty as now the government has the right to intervenue with private businesses! And the cherry on the cake: We'll have nothing being allowed to produce at all because every single atom has to come from somewhere, and that somewhere will always be nature! Great, you're a genius!
wow,.,,you even lie about ozone...and the hole...pure propaganda.
reverend moonie by hole they mean heavily weaken ozone in the area. So it looks like a hole when ya see it from those graphs
i dont get it, aren't these who are " pushing back " living on this planet?????????
You could mention the way in which ozone captures UV-light, but it'd probably screw your smartass "politicians i'm not daring to address by name are ruining the atmosphere, because they can"-routine.
For those of you who skipped chemistry for sociology -- ozone is an unstable substance, that created when a loose oxygen atom meets O2 molecule with consumption of a UV-photon, after some time it breaks down to O + O2 with extra energy dissipating as a heat. Yep chlorine is affecting this balance, but more air is UV-exposed the more ozone is created.
Perhaps you shouldn't have left out an ozone 'hole' is one in which a region of ozone falls below 220 dobson units. Naturally ozone levels drop above this threshold in polar winters when no Sun is shinning on that region. Due to ODSs ozone levels continue to drop past the 220 DU threshold forming a 'hole'. If you want to call out others on their science you better make sure to get yours correct.
And he didn't want to take a stance in his video by bagging trump openly. He just wanted to state facts
Banning refrigeration gases always takes a while. There's been R22 and R23 about 15-20yrs ago, those were the 2 main gases used. A lot of countries agreed on getting rid of it because of their devastating effect on the ozone layer, but for another 5 to 10 years you were allowed to refill it in already existing systems but not to use fill new ones with it. After that period of time you had to change gases and for that you had to change the sealing gasket where it was possible (solenoid valves for example) otherwise it would happen pretty fast for those gaskets to get a leakage. But even changing the sealing gaskets wasn't the solution. Still most of the system where they were changed were leaking after months or a few years.
Same thing is now happening with R404a. The prices already rose extraordinarily high this year. However there are more more systems (especially supermarkets) built containing R744 as a refrigerant, which is nothing else but CO2 and not as bad for the enivronment as the other gases. For example 3kg R404 has a CO2 equivalent of 11 metric tons of CO2.
However CO2 is running with a much higher pressure which makes construction costs higher due to more safety devices required like gas warners in cold rooms, high pressure release valves on every compressor, thicker copper tubes and so on. Cause yeah, you dont normally run above 30bars with 1,5mm wall thickness of the tube. For higher pressures you use a thicker tube and the high pressure required isn't to joke with. On the suction side you have around 25 bars compared to 2 bars with R404a (depends on the required suction gas temp, the deeper you want your temperatur the less of pressure you have).
Half the world is still using R 12. There is no ban. The ozone hole is all bullshit like global warming
It _does_ sound familiar. It's the same thing that is happening _right now_ with *animal agriculture* -- the largest human-made environmental catastrophe in the history of our species, very well known, and virtually not talked about.
#govegan
well in about 30-40 years we can make meat from cells instead of animals.
does that count as vegan?
Purple Turtle you don't even have to kill nor use animals tale a couple hundred cells and you can make indefinitely meat with no deaths, isn't that your dream as vegans?
As if in the history of the Earth there has never been a period where organisms created more methane or carbon dihidroxyde than we have today?
I don't know, and I doubt anyone does. From quick Google searches I've read that the percentage of C2O in the captured (frozen air) was the same as today.
Global warming is a scam. It's just corporations invested in batteries and solar panels, and now they need someone to buy them.
Same with food. Corporations need consumers for their overpriced "vegan/gluten free" food.
jack ripper Nahh. You’re missing the details bro. Take the level of CO2 over the previous decades and you’ll see a massive spike. That’s what’s causing the big discussion on climate change. As for the vegan/gluten part I feel going vegetarian wouldn’t hurt. Plus gluten is bad for you :/
when you said CFC and aerosol cans I thought about the DuPont Monopoly in patents there's reasons why there is not an ozone in the Southern and Northern hemispheres of this planet you do need sunlight to create naturally occurring ozone. but I forgot the world was flat in the sun's always there because we're stuck under the dome maybe that's the reason. For god sakes how come we don't pay carbon tax we could have saved the planet by now raise those taxes save the planet.
Keep politics out ur doing the right thing dont want to lose viewers plus better to have an open mind
this isnt about fucking politics. climate change has nothing to do with politics
vincent schuurhof he was praising him for not being political about global warming. Global warming by itself isn't political but the disagreements behind it is.
Tom Martin science isn’t political.
I think Trac wears glasses to look more intelligent. I've seen him wear contacts before too so I think that it's just marketing.
Why are you always wear glasses when you discuss science are you trying to look smart?😂😂
cabdimalik ali maybe because he needs them?
Correction: it fixed itself. Not worrying about could've saved millions of the impoverished from misquito borne disease.
Can't I just watch a damn you tube video without Trump being "mentioned".
Crimson King you can’t ignore the fact that one of the biggest greenhouse emitting countries aren’t signed in because of Trump. He is literally the reason we aren’t in. It’s not a surprise and they aren’t at fault for “mentioning” him
Hopefully max in three years, you can...
Trump wasn't mentioned in any way unless I might be wrong which can be the case
I know right? And I was also thinking that there are also many cases that go unmentioned where flimsy evidence is actually flimsy.
Crimson King America an epitome racism and a False self made perception of the word great.
Antarctic Treaty is the most important thing done to protect our planet!
tell that to china
China has 1,3 billion people and the US has 300 million... Still the US is emitting more than half the amount carbon dioxide that China is. The only problem at this point is the US and the stupid people who live there.
It's actually the u.s.a
FYI, US is short for United States.
and china is pulling a huge effort to fight global warming: reforestation on a massive scale (they will reach the 2030 target in 2020), its now the largest producer of solar power , the only nation focused on developing Thorium MSR ...and the list goes on
Salim Zwein and don't forget areas like Tibet and east Turkestan that have beautiful wildlife and are virtually untouched
Could we do it today? We're screwed.
Trump 2020!!!
wishful thinking!
Embarrassingly, yeah. Trump wins 2020. Seriously Dems, get your sh** together.
Calling it now, Trace is going to get a Glasses Sponsor
Just like Curious Droid and the shirts.
first
I JUST LIKE TO SAY FIRST I KNOW THERES NO REASON
02:42
And here we have 3 Molecules of Ozone in the Fidget Spinner Configuration...
what effects would there be if the ozone molecules increase 100 fold ?
I'm so happy for all of those nation's... I was actually going to cry thinking about the future of all living things on Earth, now I'm happy!
Hopefully animal agriculture will be regulated/reduced! Less meat, less heat fellas!
To measure ozone levels you have to destroy ozone
maybe if we had clean burning cars the world would be less fucked
This sounds like when lead was in gasoline.
Could they please do the same with the US presidency?
Do you still do podcasts?
Was tons spelled “tonnes” in the video?
joshua bonnell yeah that's the other way of spelling it
Landen Nipper thanks
lol
The difference between American spelling and the rest of the world
I know Mario Molina's nephew. He's one of the only mexican nobel prizes
There's something I hate about these "science journalists". Is it the axes they have to grind?
""yuh, but that global warming could heat frigid northern states"" - Twit-in-chief
"In the East, it could be the COLDEST New Year’s Eve on record. Perhaps we could use a little bit of that good old Global Warming that our Country, but not other countries, was going to pay TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS to protect against. Bundle up!" 7:01 PM - Dec 28, 2017 tweets the moron-in-chief
When I think of a Ozone layer i think of a layer
At least we had more oxygen.
Now we are waiting for the temperature to rise for 5 degrees to do something against climate change.
That’s because there was a decent alternative to cfc’s
There isn’t to fossil fuels
Sounds like my chemistry text book
Too many pheminasis to agree on anything anymore.
I swear those 339 dislikes are fcking me off who are those subhumans??
“I know the past and I can for spell the future. It's the same as our history.“
Who quote this?
THERE IS NO HOLE IN THE OZONE LAYER. THERE WAS NEVER A HOLE IN THE OZONE LAYER. Stop saying that
Excellent presentation and vulgarization :)
Those people are heroes.
This video is very "misleading". You showed data from 1985 from September to October. Later on you showed data from July 2017. I check both years on NASA page, on the same month and I found no difference at all, contradicting the statement you said that the Ozone Layer is healing.
mm.. i think we can agree all nations to make it worse o_O
Is the mechanism behind how Ozone absorbs UV-B radiation and Carbon Dioxide trapping heat in earth's atmosphere the same mechanism?
it sounds like we have to do this if we want to protect our ozone, dunno why this is debatable, if we have to phase out specific chemicals thats just what we have to adjust to.
What about China and india?
We have to recreate ozone layer synthetically and release it to the atmosphere. Is it doable, though? Last time I heard, O3 cannot be synthesized. I'm only a regular person with ideas, but no knowledge of chemistry.
Cahidi Joyo Raharjo that would be a great idea, but in the meantime we sadly just have to listen to these loons in government as they destroy our home
Cahidi Joyo Raharjo well ozone is actually harmful to us to breathe....its smog in big cities so "creating it" at the surface level isn't really smart.
+MountainMan Oh, I have no idea that O3 is poisonous to us. Maybe using a containment unit? Where there is a will, there is a way.
that makes no sense at all.
you can't just change geophysically the earth. it's impossible.
As a US Citizen, I apologize for our embarrassment of a "president" who probably couldn't even pass a 4th grade science class. Please don't forget that the majority of us actually voted for someone else, and our uneducated masses just did a great job screwing our country.
plz make more vid like this. your awesome love your vids( especially Dnews)
So leaving the Paris agreement, is pretty much for big companies to do whatever they want. Creating more factories is more jobs, but at the expense for a healthy planet for future generations. The only ppl to blame is yourself america.
3:06 thane thane thane thane pane pane pane pane
There should not be anymore conventions and agreements untill and unless all the 197 countries show certain effects and results. In my nation the prices of airconditoners having HFC R410 and CFC R22 are significantly different. Most people will opt cheaper. Only legislations wont suffice the humanity execution will. Everyone must do their part
The difference between the Ozone and the Man-made Climate change Arguments is simple there is no a consensus among all Climate Scientists that a warmer climate would cause a doomsday scenario as many climate change alarmists predict and the computer-generated climate models in the last 20 years have failed to accurately confirm the predicted changes in climate over that period. The proposed solutions to cut carbon emissions with Carbon credits and Carbon Taxes will cost Trillions of US Dollars and is predicted to have a negligible impact on lowering temperatures by the year 2100. Stopping the use of CFCs over the last 40-50 years have resulted in the hole in the Ozone layer to shrink. Spray cans, refrigerators, and Aircons can be designed to use alternative refrigerants instead of CFC'sand still be economical, replacing fossil fuels, on the other hand, is a lot harder to do as Hydro, Wind, and Solar power generation is currently still too expensive and unreliable.
how it all happened..
*World starts ending*
Industry: "It's not our fault"
*Science proves industry is to blame, Vienna Conventions passed*
Industry: "Fine we'll sign it, but you have to reimburse our lost income."
The 70's seems to have been the last time the USA had something approaching government for the people. Reagan's 'new morning in America' brought deregulation, the decline of journalism, and Milton Friedman's failed neoliberal economics. It was not a dawn but twilight.
i've seen the latest stats of global emissions regarding CO2 and CH4... it doesnt look good and we will lose most if not all glaciers before this problem is fixed (if it is fixed that in the first place)
Not to mention the global temperature increase (currently it sits at 0.99 °C) and the fear of reaching 1.5 °C which would create chaos and kill countless plant species which would in turn kill animal species and so on
im not trying to make you people depressed and throw everything out of your hands now but stuff like this needs to be repeated over and over just like the subject for the ozone layer was