How U.S Infantry Almost Switched to the XM-8 Rifle
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 тра 2024
- If you’re ever injured in an accident, you can check out Morgan & Morgan. You can start your claim in just a click without having to leave your couch. To start your claim, visit: www.forthepeople.com/TaskandP...
This is the legendary XM8 rifle. It fires 556 at a rate of 750 rounds per minute. In the early 2000’s the XM8 was actually on the verge of replacing the aging M4 series as the US army’s primary infantry rifle. What followed was a story filled with drama, intrigue and accusations that it wasted $33 million dollars worth of taxpayers dollars. I think the XM8 is a great example of what happens when science, bureaucracy and soldiers' needs all collide in the worst possible way. But if it was never adopted why is it still an iconic weapon why is it still a household name? You’re about to hear the story of one of the most ambitious firearms programs and how its failure helped pave the way for the next generation weapons of today.
Written by: Chris Cappy and Diego Aceituno
Video Edited by: Chris Cappy
subscribe to: @spartan117gw / @spartan117gw
Thanks for making this video possible !
The saga of the XM8 started in 2002 just one year after the war in Afghanistan had kicked off. Lower enlisted grunts were complaining about their M4’s jamming and malfunctioning constantly. The Army vice chief of staff General Jack Keane was outraged when he heard this. The man went on a warpath to solve the problem. He turned to a brand new organization called PEO soldier lead by Colonel Moran to finally replace the M4. PEO-Soldier the agency responsible for prototyping everything a soldier wears or carries to this day. The agency had a special power they had the authority to ignore much of the government red tape and go around slow moving bureaucracy. The goal was to replace the M4 within 3 years instead of the normal 10 it would take. These guys wanted to speed run weapons development. Colonel Moran immediately set out to find a loophole. Something that would ultimately doom the XM8 rifle.
The first thing you normally need when trying to create a new firearm in the military is something called an “Operational requirement” document. These are written up by the Infantry Center. This would define the XM8 rifles necessary firepower, magazine size, rate of fire, weight, all of its capabilities. But there was a problem. It normally took years and a multi-step approval process to get a new one authorized. If you think that sounds boring and bureaucratic, so too did Colonel Moran. So Instead he dug up an old previously approved “operational requirement” from almost ten years earlier from the 1994 Objective Individual Combat Weapon Program. What was that? The OICW program was essentially an XM8 rifle with a 20mm programmable airburst grenade slapped onto the top of it. Sounds like something that could be useful right so why did it end up stalling? The weapons' grenades weren’t powerful enough, it weighed a ton at 17.6 lbs which is more than an M249, and future versions of it malfunctioned during training injuring a soldier. All that is to say, the OICW program was a dead end. But Colonel Moran believed he could split it into two separate projects with Increment I being the XM8 and Increment II being the airburst grenade launcher.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @taskandpurpose
Task & Purpose is a military news and culture oriented channel. We want to foster discussion about the defense industry.
Follow me on socials:
/ cappyarmy
/ cappyarmy
Email capelluto@taskandpurpose.com for inquires.
#ARMY #MILITARY #WEAPON
If you’re ever injured in an accident, you can check out Morgan & Morgan. You can start your claim in just a click without having to leave your couch. To start your claim, visit: www.forthepeople.com/TaskandPurpose?s=86%3A2313
8:15. mad respect. I usually was try to reach dip or peanut m&ms
Or H&K's version, Shmorgan and Jorgan
It's the size of a speedboat, that's what went wrong
Wasn't that air burst grenade launcher really popular with the field testing units. I'd love to see a video about that.
Fu Morgan&Morgan hate these ads. They are why Florida residents are paying 800 per month for insurance and that's regular coverage. Screw them.
"Accusations that it wasted millions of taxpayer dollars." Woah the government wasting money no way
🤣🤌🤌🤌
CAPPY, PIN THIS 1! 🍻
For some reason I feel good about millions vs Billions.
For real. Money is no object to these people, but they pretend to care about costs when it suits them.
Shoot at targets you can't miss, right?
@Coldturtle I am shocked, shocked I say.
People tend to forget, this was the most reliable service rifle ever tested and they didnt accept simply because of cost and pride since it wasnt american
Exactly what happened with the FAL
nope cuz the M16 is much better.
Liked it as a teen because it looked like the br55 rifle from halo. But honestly the M4 is fine. This has weird ergonomics
And then they replace M16A2s and M4A1s for HK416s for the Marines. Great decision, but hypocritical......
Cost? it is a G36, a gun designed to be cheap for a (then) broke Germany
"Who knew the infantry could write?"
Not knowing how to do something has never and will never stop the infantry.
Power of the blue cord
A document like the ORD is not the first step in solving problems in for-profit industry. But, of course we're dealing with other peoples' money here. The first step is a problem statement. It's also typical of people, especially technically trained men, to jump directly to solution space (this is how we get equipment destined for the innards of a submarine larger than the hatch opening). If you accurately define the limitations of the current state and the desired end state, you will know when you have the optimal solution. The second step is a compendium of use cases that formulate a scope statement... what you are doing and what you are not doing. Next would be a doc like the ORD, including features, capabilities, specifications, limitations, etc. It also helps to measure qualitative and quantitative risk frequently.
"How hard could it be?"
Is this a monkeys, typewriters, Shakespeare thing?
@@rossanderson5815 More usually it's really more of a big hammer, square peg, round hole kind of thing.
“The Xm-8 is not a significant improvement so we’re not adopting it”
Me, an 8 year old who loved it in Ghost Recon: this will be your downfall
Man Ghost Recon was the shit back in the day
It was my favorite in metal gear solid
If you loved it in the original Ghost Recon games then I was the man who made the mod that brought them in!
Chief of the Malaysian Armed Forces : " I hear you !" and they got the rifle.
@@clavo6498 super slept on take!!!!
The XM8 shines because of MGS4!!! I remember that haha.
Also the 2012 iteration of it as the M8A1 in Bo2.
The XM8 always made me think that it was the offspring of a G36 and a Star Trek phaser rifle.
We need phaser rifles.
It's literally an evolution of the G36 that was made to look "more Starship Troopers", at the request of a US General. Using those words.
That's what it is.
It wouldn't be out of place in the XCOM games either.
@@DrownedInExile Ther is a rifle based on this one in Helldivers 2
Malaysian Navy Special Forces: *I'LL TAKE YOUR ENTIRE STOCK*
There is also a rail mount version
I mean it's quite good...
PASKAL adopted it and I don't think they've complained.
@@erikasan3299 What does gambling have to do with this?
@@johndough1703 ? Gambling? There's nothing about gambling in my comment. You tripping?
@@johndough1703nahh bro no one ever said a thing about gambling you lost some bits of your mind there.
I was mechanized infantry from 2002 to 2006 and all this talk about M-4s needing to be replaced sounds quaint. We spent our entire units budget on Bradley’s and carried ancient M-16s we referred to as our muskets.
When I was 11H in the Guard, we had TOW-2B’s (very modern at the time) while still using ancient M16A1’s.
@@jds3068
Over an M16A1?
Hell yeah!
@@jds3068what jungle conflict was ongoing in 2002-2006
Shit was desert
All that talk about adopting the XM7 must sound quaint to you too then
@@RockSolitude sounds like sci fi madness and when I was active we all thought it looked a bit gimmicky and was moving too fast. It was a pipe dream. Besides my unit was still using ye olde muskets.
I remember this thing being in about every single video game from 2007 to 2013.
Battlefield Bad Company.
Black Ops 2.
Metal Gear Solid 4.
Saints Row 2.
Rainbow Six: Vegas.
And I'm probably missing out a metric ton of others.
Crysis
Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter
You never played the earlier title Conflict Global Storm? The Conflict series.
Ghost Recon 2
Arma 2: PMC DLC
“Tactical modular enhanced kinetic lethality.” I think I got all the favorites in a legible sentence 😂
BINGO!
This is a flamethrower. 🔥
_IT THROWS FLAMES!_ 🔥🔥🔥🔥
I'd add 'multiplier' at the end :-)
@@Zmok Yeah, something something multi-purpose.. 😄
@@Zmok you forgot "synergy" ;)
I was in the army when all of this was going on, and I remember when the trial results were released and the M4 faired the worst of the competitors by orders of magnitude everybody said, "Army spends millions of dollars to hear what soldiers have been saying since 1962."
Thanks for having me a part of this! This was a ton of fun to make!
Thanks for helping! You were great
thanks for helping put this together Greg ! can't wait to drop the PKM episode that one is going to be awesome
13:38-14:20 Just want to point out that nowadays Sig Sauer is basically an American company (with German ownership). The Swiss Branch is tiny compared to what it once was and the German branch of the company has been defunct since 2020. Pretty much most, if not all, of the modern offerings by SIG, from the P320, the MPX, and to the MCX Spear have been designed and made in the US. So, by choosing the SIG XM7, the Army technically is still buying American first.
Companies go where buisness is.
And, if you make weapons, there is no better place than the USA.
Not only do you have an INSANE military budget (I think you spend as much as the next eight countries behind you, ALL TOGETHER), but you can also count on all the US-gun-nuts buying your "civil" version.......If I was in the buissnes of designing and builduing weapons, I know where I would locate my company.......God bless the second amendment, and the "manifest destiny" right? :)
Actually Sig Sauer in the US belongs to Sig Sauer AG in Switzerland which in turn belongs to L&O Holding in Germany.
@Braun30 SIG Sauer Inc. (American SIG) doesn't belong to SIG Sauer AG. While they are both owned by L&O Holdings, they are sister companies. They may share the SIG Sauer name and logo, but other than that, they are basically independent from each other.
SIG Sauer, Inc. was actually spun off in the mid 1980's from Sig Sauer GmbH, the now defunct German branch, as a way for Sig to sell the P220 series in the US market. It also so that it could secure the contract for the XM9, which it lost to Beretta. However, over time, and especially after it built its factory in New Hampshire, the American Sig rapidly outgrew its Swiss and German counterparts. By 2000, it grew to a point that it was elevated from a subsidiary to a sister company independent from the German Sig.
This newfound independence allowed the American SIG to innovate and manufacture its own designs, as well as diversify into other things like red dots and scopes. This is the branch that designed guns like the MPX, MCX, P320, etc.
Meanwhile, back in Europe, the story is very different. The Swiss Sig (SIG Sauer AG), while making very high-quality firearms, isn't as relevant as it used to be. The German branch, after years of stagnation and controversies, closed its doors and went defunct in 2020.
This is why I say that nowadays, Sig Sauer is basically an American company with German ownership. Its primary operations are in the US and independent from the Swiss branch. Its weapons are also designed and manufactured in the US. Heck, its main customers are US civilians and the US Gov't. The only thing that remains European is its ownership group, and that's pretty much it.
TLDR: American SIG went beyond its intended purpose as an importer of arms from German SIG into what is now the flagship company that carries the SIG Sauer name today.
@@googoogagagagoo5254 I know that American SIG Sauer is now making the same arms originally produced in Switzerland.
I presume this is what the market needs.
Cheap lookalike weapons.
@@Braun30 As far as I know, the only originally Swiss guns that the American Sig Sauer still makes are the P210, the P220, and the P226 (along with its derivatives). However, it has always been making P226's since its US factory opened in the early 90's. As for the P210, Sig USA has been making them since 2017, which was 7 years ago.
Also, while they may look like the original Swissguns, ~US$1000 for a P226 and ~US$2000 for a P210 is by no means cheap.
American Sig Sauer used to also import semi auto SG550's called the SIG 556, but they were discontinued in 2017 and since been replaced by the MCX, American Sig's own design.
US: I need a new rifle
HK: Shows the G36
US: It looks like a fish
HK: Sorry, we´ll fix it
Also HK: Makes it look even more like a fish
I think you mean;
US: It looks like a fish. Make it look like something out of Starship Troopers!
(HK Makes it look even more like a fish)
US: Perfect!
@ryanbauer3680 I think it was on forgotten weapons video about the XM-8, but they said that the weapons acquisitions people actually told HK that they needed to make the gun look "more starship troopers." They didn't care much about the functionality of the rifle towards the end of development, they were more concerned about how it looked.
Look up Vektor CR21, now THAT looks like a fish
@@k7j007 To quote Rainier Wolfcastle;
"That's the joke."
@@connor3288oh holy shit it does
I remember rocking this gun on my loadout in Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter my personal favorite
SOCOM Tactical Strike on my PSP for me, loved how futuristic it looked for the time
It was a bullsh1t hipfire machine in Battlefield Bad Company 2. While also accurate aim down sights.
Bro, just remembering the GRAW days on xbox live. Even the story was good.
sounds cool!
I liked the 6.8mm m4 for online
Having this gun in bad company was such an icon.
I remember testing this at Benning. They had us jumping up and down on it and stopped us short of throwing it under our Bradley's. I remember when they brought the long rifle and machine gun upper receivers for us to test and it worked well. They tied this into the Future Soldier Program, which was testing before it's official start later at Benning. They pushed hard after the Infantryman's Conference to get this started. Same timeframe as to when Dragon skin body armor was coming around. When combined together it all sounded good but wasn't the best. A and B 1/29 Inf tested these alongside 3rd Ranger Bat and the issues got worse and worse the more we worked with systems and they eventually had us stop testing. Fun times being part of its history even though it never was adopted.
What type issues got worse and worse? I love to hear stories from the actual people who tested stuff like this
@@yupyup4209 on the upper meant to replace the 249/240, the higher amount of rounds and usage the worse the zeroing got and it became harder to do swaps. Also, while a lot was combined into a single unit to swap, it made long term maintenance a pain in the ass. Our armorer hated them. And as noted in the video, the optics options sucked. They did have a work around for battery life, a corded unit with a bigger battery you could carry but then we now had a larger battery that we had to worry about it getting hit by a round plus the extra weight. As a dismount, I didn't have an AG so I had to carry all my gear and the less weight meant I could technically carry more myself but because of how the upper, butt stock, attachments, etc were all integrated larger pieces it meant lots of larger awkward pieces. So it meant we kept a lot in the back of the Bradley's as dismounts but the trade off was they had to stick closer to us if we wanted easier access and thus negating being dropped off as a dismount.
Really scientific test scenario.
@@tango_uniform It's called stress testing
The sexiest gun and the poster child of black ops II
Also use this gun in ghost recon advanced warfare
I first saw this gun in Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter
No one cares
@@dmoney8602 you cared enough to comment the cliche no one cares bot
and bad company 2 but your too young for that one i guess ;)
I joined the Army back in 2003 and I so excited when I heard this weapon was going to be released. Then I was sorely disappointed when the XM-8 was canceled and I deployed to the desert with an M4:(
So many Xm8 field tester can't find charging handle(ar style) therefore they drop it and stick with M4 xD
I didn't get my m4 till 2006
@@NekomiyaTH so you're telling me our Armed Forces back then were dumb enough not to read the guns manual?? 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
@EastlakeRasta7 a lot of soldiers i knew were more a liability with a weapon than an asset with one
@@EastlakeRasta7 we bunch of 18-19yo dum as heck Sargent had to point out how to operate all the shi xD
When I was at basic in Fort Jackson in 2006, they had these big Army marketing posters with soldiers wearing the new UCP camo and holding XM8s. I honestly thought we were going to get to train on them. Then we were issued ancient M16A2s lol.
At least you were issued M16A2s and not using M16A1s at Basic/AIT like we were back in 1988... Just saying.
The A2 was introduce in my time in, not everyone is a kid;-)
@@vicnighthorse Buddy of mine just went through BCT two years ago - now they're getting M4s with Aimpoint CCOs. Not sure if they even qualify with iron sights anymore.
Lucky...I was at Jackson 11-05 to 05-06 and we had A1s 😬💪😂
I was at Jackson in early 2011. We had M16A2 with iron sights. They issued one guy a SAW and one guy a M4, and they passed it around during training.
This thing was in almost every shooter in the 2000s. It looked really cool and promising and I was sad that it never got picked up by the US, but was surprised to learn that it didnt actually die and was adopted by a few countries
By few countries,you mean only one country
We bought 800 plus for our special navy force. They loved it. We got it at a very cheap price due to USA rejection.
Which navy?
@@angelaferkel7922Like Southeast Asia.
@@angelaferkel7922 probably malaysia
@@angelaferkel7922 malaysia
I learned of the XM8 from Ghost Recon 2 way back in early 2000 and been one of my favorite exotic guns since that and the F2000
Good old days, Ghost Recon 1+2 and Splinter Cell
What great insight into the military procurement and the various issues that need to be addressed. On the one hand, bureaucracy can tie an organization up with enough "red tape" to kill the host but on the other side of the equation guardrails need to be in place so that a project doesn't run amok and out of control. Lesson? Military procurement is very very difficult. Soldiers lives are at stake.
As an aside I've never seen General Jack Kean looking SO young. He's a real patriot, cares about the USA and is very smart.
Agreed...which is why I posted, "Everyone hates bureaucracy until they realize that it exists to be able to control extremely large organizations from running wild. "
*quadrails need to be in place so that a project doesn't go amok.
Fixed it for you.
I believe this weapon was doomed from the very beginning, and otherwise may have actually succeeded if only it had a quad-rail.
They advertise it as modular, but only with fancy new parts manufactured by the makers specifically for this weapon. That's not truly modular. They were never going to replace the M4 with something incapable of hosting all the leftover gadgets some people put on them.
Also, training. It's one thing to supply the army with new weapons. It's a whole other thing to have enough hand-me-downs to train new troops on. So that's another huge issue, but it falls in line with the same basic flaw... that they replaced a functional and familiar quadrail with something that looks "cool"..
The XM8 was not PEO Soldiers finest hour, but they have been an incredibly effective organization in a ton of ways; especially in the area of head protection. They spent two decades churning out new and improved helmet designs as fast as polymer science could provide them and directly saved a large number of lives; to the point that Staff Sargeant Bryan McQueen took a 7.62x54R out of a PKM to the back of the head from 20 feet while wearing an Enhanced Combat Helmet during a green on blue and was not only alive, but only suffered a moderate brain bleed.
Ow! But amazing! But also ow!
Right hand free for a poptart? Ahh, average infantryman right?
Actually the left hand.
Can't forget this was a 2000s era project. I'm surprised it didn't have a holder for an obnoxiously aggressive energy drink on it.
The Malaysian Navy XM8 was essentially the preproduction run ones from HK. Malaysia did a trial across all branches in 2005 ish, presumably to replace Vietnam era M16s and the AUG (It was crumbling in Malaysian weather). However all ended up buying license-produced M4s, and the produced XM8s were passed to the Navy, including the elusive PDW prototype.
The M4 was designed to be an improvement over the M14
The M4, while not perfectable for every contingency imaginable, doesn't require $3700/ea to overcome said imperfections.
It's just metal, composites and accessories.
Better idea: Give 3700 professional armorer's a chance to submit their idea's. Somewhere in that pile of idea's and samples will be your next weapon.
I remember coming into reception into Ft. Jackson and having a gigantic poster on a wall with a Soldier in ACUs holding unto an XM8. It now feels like a fever dream. 😅
Saw that same poster in 05
@@bakedAK85 Yup! I joined in 06!
I remember thinking this gun looking so futuristic when seeing it in games from the early 2000s
I remember seeing it the XXX: State of the Union (2005) movie. The German Heckler & Koch G36 also dominated pop culture around that time
It's basically a G36 in a shark costume.
I think it still looks futuristic.
It was fun with grenade launcher on Battlefield Bad company
This and the F2000.
The 12.5" one is my dream rifle, and the old optics mounting system was badass so you can just swap optics without rezeroing every time. Looks so badass
I'm so disappointed that the XM8 wasn't adopted. It was truly ahead of its time. Too bad the program was rushed or maybe it would have been adopted.
Don't be disappointed. The design was flawed from the start. What wasn't mentioned in this video is that the G36 this rifle was based on suffered from the same issues and was a huge waste of time and money for the Germans too. It's now being replaced by the HK416.
Well, it wasn't ahead of anything. It's just a 5.56 rifle with even less modular capabilities than Stoner 63 had.
It did eventually adopted,but only just one country only
It really did not last, lacked more features than the AR15 and suffered greatly.from being a short sighted design.
@@AdministrativeReload The G36 is being replaced because of political reasons. Has nothing to do with the rifle itself. It was neither a waste of time nor money. It did its job, and it did its job good. Earlier models had some problems, like the integrated scope fogging up, etc., but that was all fixed by the time we got the A3 and A4.
My first time seeing the XM8 was in Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots.
RATPT01 or Rat Patrol Team 01 had these as a standard issue rifle but still had different versions of it.
Default, Compact and the DMR version.
@@CyranofromBergerac
Which of the 3?
Praying Mantis, Pieuvre Armement & Raven Sword all used the Scar-L Mk.17
@@Irano1995 My bad, I haven't played in a while and misremembered. I think the US Army did in act 3 but am second guessing myself now.
@@CyranofromBergerac
Could be 😂 Can't remember it quite well myself
I remember in the 2000s when so many Tom Clancy games featured this weapon.
5:45 "these are the same people, who helped design cars for Audi" - shows Mercedes car 🙂
Idk if Cappy did that by mistake, or ON PURPOSE BECAUSE DUDE IS SO NATURALLY FUNNY! 🤣🤌🤌🤌
These things are sometimes done on purpose just so people like you will comment. It's to drive engagement
*shows car from major competitor to VW who owns Audi* he wasn't just wrong he was ABSOLUTELY wrong
One of my defining moments for my enjoyment of military games was playing Ghost Recon: Advanced Warfighter way back in 2006, and the XM8 being my favorite gun to run in that game. It just looks so damn cool. I still want to own one if I ever get a chance.
In some alternate timeline we’re using XM8s and XM25s, still rocking M81, and everything is right in the world.
Our timeline blows.
Excellent upload! Been very interested in this topic
The XM8 could have been so great. I am German and personally prefer the XM8 over the G36 (and the M4, by far). What a shame that it's problems never got sorted out. But hey, that's what AU's are for. Just imagine an XM8 inspired bullpup 🤤
the xm8 and the g36 are some of my favourite things to ever come out of the firearms scene
Dude what an awesome look at the XM-8. I had no idea or history was so interesting. Thanks for this info.
Nice work Cappy!
Whenever I hear about this rifle, PASKAL always comes to my mind considering the fact that they're the only special force that uses this rifle
Video games are the only reason we care about this
I've missed this kind of content by this channel. It's like the stuff you were putting out 3-4 years ago
up to 1.54M subs, nice work Cappy!
Excellent video as usual Cap!!!
Colonel Moran?! My god! The Chieftain has had an interesting career!!
8:32 hold up, there’s a Jurassic Park Jeep there. That’s the real gem here.
Ghost Recon 2 giving it Marksman, LMG and standard functionality, that fish gun had it all! Bummed as I am that it didn't get adopted, glad there are conversion kits to get as close to owning one as possible
It does look great. I've always loved the look.
I 🤣😂🤣 so hard at the supply sergeant comment that I had to rewind the video.
I enjoy all of Task & Purpose videos
I remember that rifle and they were talking about it back in the late 90's and showed a couple of different variants.
My country special forces use XM8 Rifle
Which country?
@@larryc1616 Malaysia
@@shimadwan8251PASKAL unit?
@@Randomly_Browsing yes
I was super pumped to get one in 2006, we even had a poster in our basic training barracks. Alas...it was not to be.
Great, informative video again, thx!
I loved this gun in every game when I was a kid😅
I remember watching a show on the history, or discovery channel about this gun back in the day. I always wondered what happened to it.
It’s always wild to see just how much firearm technology and development has progressed in the last 20 years.
Sonic weapons & railguns are already being effectively deployed in active fire exercises. The future of conventional warfare is going to be insane.
My agency went with g36k's and although a nice system the optics were about useless especially in a tactical environment... quickly it was only used as a perimeter weapon or just on approach to a target and guys often transitioned to pistols inside structures.
... after a few years we traded all in and got a solid m4 platform with eotech optics... so much better.
Another example of a command not listening to the troops on the ground until they had too.
I guess nobody in your agency of geniuses ever thought of just replacing the 1990's sights with rails. That would have been a lot cheaper.
@@G-Mastah-Fash the K's we had we were issued had the two optics and yes our command said that's all you need... so we didn't use em and they got replaced with rifles we could use... if they had gotten C's we would have been all good but our dated upper echelon seriously thought the K was better since no need to buy an optic ... all against our requests. Luckily they moved on and so did we 😀
@@douglasthomas8513 Forcing people to use that blue ass red dot really is a crime.
Tom has only built about 100 of those conversion XM8 guns. I have one. Super nice gun.
Fast decisions aren't necessarily bad decisions provided they are objective. What happens is when people wanting fast go in with predetermined outcomes and ignore unfavorable evidence that was there from the beginning. The army isn't the only organization to operate this way. I used to work for Kroger corporation that is about the same size as the army and makes the same quality of decisions.
You're talking about literally every large group of people though. It's just one way society operates.
Reminds me of the old BFBC2 days. Ah the memories 😏
Xm-8, underslung shotgun, 93R burst handgun. Hip fire all day long.
Yup! With that grenade launcher attachment
I LOL @ the Pop Tart comment😅
Been ages since I had one. Where all the Strawberry Pop Tart people @?!
I remember being at AIT at fort Lee in 2005. They had how to disassembly posters of these things hanging up on some of the walls.
ok when you said being in every videogame in the early 2000s, all i could think about was bad company 2 and how every single promo screenshot had the xm8 on it. i miss the bad company series so much
Could you do an update on the Sig XM5 program? Or has it been canceled already?
there is some limited new information on it, the US armys 101st airborne division is testing the weapons out right now. I haven't heard a lot of new news there, I'm planning to do an update soon once there is some more details
120 days to deliver? Seems like HK just remodeled the aesthetics of the G36 and called it a day.
I was at the School of Americas when they were testing and the expo of the XM8 and the other prototype weapon systems
I & several of my coworkers got our hands on some XM-8s while they were being tested in Yuma Proving Grounds. They thought it would be a good idea to get end user opinions & ask some of us over from the Freefall school. There were good things about it but it didn’t pass the smell test. We melted some handguards. They only had black ones & said some general only wanted black not brown guns. They had a proprietary mounting system, not picatinny. There was no explanation why they just didn’t ring us G-36s. We didn’t miss the XM-8. The big disappointment was that Magpul Masada/ACR. So much potential, so little delivery.
Wow you had that stock set too short in the intro...Fun fact :The AK style mag release lever is what killed interest in it with Special forces, along with the weirdo mounting options not being picatinny rails which were well in use by early 2000s.
The rifle itself was a step back in terms of modernization. Even to this day it would still have problems getting modernized to fit anyone's bill.
And these days the German army is replacing its G36 with an M4 variant xD
It's more like an in between of AR-15 and 18 which the M16/4 and G36 are based from. Models up the AR-15 design but takes aspects of the 18 that were considered better.
Thanks, really enjoyed
Beretta did the same Dodging with the M9A3, making “Updates” and trying to loophole a Completely New Pistol under the M9 Contract… It didn’t go well… Neither has the Sig Rollout.
god damn the xm-8 looks good
NO! THERE ARE NO FLAWS! this gun is sexy and perfect in everyway!
Never talk to me or my gunfu ever again!
Cringe
@@jayocaine2946 don't care
@@musicalDrebin clearly
Bro is a 90s/2000s nostalgia freak with his XM8 and Jurassic Park-spec Jeep Wrangler @12:00
Honestly without people like Col Moran, innovations would never happen within the government.
Only reason why I knew this gun existed was because of playing Battlefield Bad Company 2 as a kid 😂
I miss that game so much.
@@anthonykreiser5298 same, I grew up watching my father play the SOCOM games on ps2 and when I got my hands the BF:BC2 it gave those vibes. Especially the soundtrack, Snowy Mountains is still one of the best.
Ghost Recon Advanced Warfare intensifies
I never knew the xm8 came from the OICW program. But ALWAYS had a hunch it did
Everything the Germans and Swiss make is *Chef's Kiss.*
We ought to have them make it, but domestically for logistics control.
Why’d you change the color of the task and purpose emblem. Red was better and it popped out more making me see it was your videos
The bad company servers have been shut down 😢
We were told in 2004 that we would be the first to deploy with the XM-8 for OIF 3, 2005-2006. Never happened, in fact I never even saw one of these on Fort Stewart. Would have been fun to at least try one out.
In Black Ops 2 universe, XM8 become the replacement of M4A1, and it was rebranded into M8A1 Assault Rifle
Saints Row 2 anyone?
The gun from black ops 2
"Looks like a fish."
FN F2000:
"Am I a joke to you?"
Oooo, to Arizona?! Haven't watched the rest of the video, but I hope we get a crossover with Forgotten Weapons.
XM8 is legendary as it is perfect by design. Should be relaunched.
Why? It's just a generic 5.56 rifle with marginally better reliability than AR platform.
It did saw a used outside US
bullpups do not balance or point well
Where my BC2 homies at?
XM8 was always my favorite gun, looks so cool and nastolgic. Reminds me of BF BC2 and COD BO2.
One note though, the bolt release is designed to be hit buy the trigger finger, not the other hand like on an AR (though you can of course if you like). If you try it with the trigger finger, it might feel a bit better, the bolt release was put in the trigger gaurd for that reason.
dawg thats a g36 in a fancy dress
g36 is a great rifle
The G36 was not so great. It cost the Germans a lot of wasted time and money and was replaced several years ago already.
@@AdministrativeReloadThe G36 is an incredibly reliable and sturdy rifle, basically puts an AK to shame. It’s lightweight and low-recoil. It’s shortcomings would be the integrated optics being pretty poor by modern standards and a point-of-impact shift when overheated (several magazines of rapid fire). Then again it’s an assault rifle, not a machine gun. The optics situation was already solved in newer iterations opting for a rail instead of integrated optics, the accuracy ‚issues‘ should be solvable with a different type of barrel. The reason for its replacement was purely political, as the then German defense minister, now president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen wanted to show she was handling things, so she needed to sacrifice a pawn.
@@RichelieuUnlimited literally this
Man I wish they made more funky weapons like the xm8
Military is switching to xm7 in some areas. Goodbye m4
@@barefootbreezy6983M4 won't be going anywhere for a long time I suspect
@@chickenfishhybrid44 5.56 wont do well against modern body armor.
@@chickenfishhybrid44 7.62 sometimes wont even penetrate level 4 body armor. Think they're def considering the .277 fury rounds for that and longer engagement distances too.
Professional bureaucrat here. There's are very good REASONS why we have red tape.
It's because whenever idiots try to things without following proper policy and procedure, things tend to go sideways in the most costly of ways.
AAH XM8 the hero of early ghost recon games.
I love the tactical tuna
FN F2000? This is more a tactical mackerel.
I remember many games during the 2010s had plenty of XM8 in it and I always thought the reason why game devs added it is because XM8 is going to be expected to replace the M4 Carbine, which as we all know, didn't really happen...
It is entirely possible that they were paid to include it by companies involved in selling it to the government
@andrewstraub131 Not really, it was more about looking cool and futuristic. I remember it being promoted in Ghost Recon: Advance Warfighter. "Loadout" probably has a video on it. If that's the case, you will get your answer.
@@andrewstraub131 HK hates their guns being portrayed in video games.
@@andrewstraub131 could easily see that lmao
@@G-Mastah-Fashproof?
I distinctly remember in early to mid 2000s on history channel watching our soldiers weopan from Gulf war until 2005ish,they then showed xm8 swore up and down this was the weopan of the future and would soon be in use
It did most likely help the g36 development,the long barreled light weight g36 with a a similar read sight post like a m16 but instead of a post it has a scope,contrary to popular belief they are not carrying handles Altough used by people it is made for sights fun fact again lol
On Wolfteam and CODthis was always my favorite💯