Oneness vs Trinity (1 of 3)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
  • The John Ankerberg Show
    Dr. Walter Martin - Christian Research Institute
    Mr. Calvin Beisner - Author: GOD IN THREE PERSONS
    VS.
    Dr. Nathaniel Urshan - general Superintendent - UPCI
    Robert Sabin - President Apostolic Bible Institute of St. Paul, Minnesota

КОМЕНТАРІ • 97

  • @peggymattie5191
    @peggymattie5191 4 роки тому +18

    Every BORN-AGAIN BELIEVER IN YESHUA/JESUS NEEDS TO LISTEN TO THIS. MOST EXCELLENT TRUTH. ONE GOD THAT EXISTS IN THREE PERSONS, YES AND AMEN🐑😇💖

    • @Dale65378
      @Dale65378 Рік тому +2

      Hi the True Almighty heavenly oh righteous Father God is the True the Lord Jesus Christ as Christ Jesus himself proved he is the Father in John 14:9
      King James Version
      9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father? Amen.

    • @Dale65378
      @Dale65378 Рік тому +1

      Hi the true God the Father is not separate from the Son and the Holy Ghost Father God is the Lord Jesus Christ in the flesh heavenly oh righteous Father God claimed to create everything by the Lord Jesus Christ the Lord Jesus Christ has said preached unto us within Ephesians 3:9
      King James Version
      9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ: Amen. Now if the Lord Jesus Christ is separate from God the Father then how can God the Father create everything by the Lord Jesus Christ?

    • @Dale65378
      @Dale65378 Рік тому

      Martin Walter is very confused he claims that he does not believe that God the Father and Jesus Christ are separate gods. Yet Martin Walter tries to confirm that God the Father is separate from the Lord Jesus Christ my question would be to Martin Walter how can the Lord Jesus Christ be separate to God the Father and Jesus still be called God when Isaiah 45:5 only refers to as there only being one True God and not a separate God? If you call Jesus God then you say Jesus is separate to God the Father you are in fact saying there are 2 true gods which is not supported in the holy King James Bible and Martin Walter would be a liar when Martin Walter he claims that he does not believe that God the Father and Jesus Christ are separate gods.

    • @Scott48-m7e
      @Scott48-m7e Рік тому

      @@Dale65378 the two Gods do not see themselves separate they work together as one

  • @matts.6558
    @matts.6558 2 роки тому +5

    "....I'm supposed to be a pagan and I have more courtesy then you..." I really enjoy brother Martin, I have learned so much from him and look forward to meeting him one day.

  • @bpbperkey1756
    @bpbperkey1756 2 роки тому +5

    Dr Martin was at his best game God highly annointed Dr. Martin

    • @Dale65378
      @Dale65378 Рік тому

      Martin Walter is very confused he claims that he does not believe that God the Father and Jesus Christ are separate gods. Yet Martin Walter tries to confirm that God the Father is separate from the Lord Jesus Christ my question would be to Martin Walter how can the Lord Jesus Christ be separate to God the Father and Jesus still be called God when Isaiah 45:5 only refers to as there only being one True God and not a separate God? If you call Jesus God then you say Jesus is separate to God the Father you are in fact saying there are 2 true gods which is not supported in the holy King James Bible and Martin Walter would be a liar when Martin Walter he claims that he does not believe that God the Father and Jesus Christ are separate gods.

  • @__HumanBeing
    @__HumanBeing 5 років тому +13

    I am not a scholar on the scriptures, but I have always understood that Jesus IS, even before He was incarnated. He has always been.
    And I am just a regular christian who loves God sincerely, saved and forgiven by His grace.

    • @jbean530
      @jbean530 5 років тому +1

      Same here. I'm only a generic bible Christian. Alpha and Omega, Behinning and End, who always was and never was not. It's pretty clear.

  • @jordandavis3867
    @jordandavis3867 4 роки тому +1

    I find it hard to understand how we can't understand the concept of the Trinity but yet we believe that God can have personal intimate relationships with all of us who are believers simultaneously, with undivided attention.

  • @BoastfulDread56
    @BoastfulDread56 5 років тому +10

    he Oneness Pentecostal movement first emerged in America around 1914.that guy just made a lie everybody knows the word is the son.

    • @madjack821
      @madjack821 4 роки тому

      GAMING IS NOT A CRIME you would be surprised.....maybe not lol

  • @madjack821
    @madjack821 4 роки тому +3

    Is there a difference between modalism and oneness theology?
    Also, I love how Martin kept referring to “what’s said in the text” with reference to the original language. You can’t go wrong that way.

    • @jeffsilkwood9878
      @jeffsilkwood9878 Рік тому

      Oneness Pentecostals are modalist, but not all modalist are Pentecostal. One refers to the group while the other refers to the theology.

  • @hairomaster2540
    @hairomaster2540 5 років тому +1

    Dr Walter you're beholding so much glory with Jesus the almaigty.... God bless you

  • @canecorsodoxa4060
    @canecorsodoxa4060 2 роки тому +1

    The oneness are showing intellectual dishonesty they know the passages are hard to be interpreted according to their views so they avoid them and make multiple inferences to try to obscure the passages from their plain meaning.

  • @pamelamyers9613
    @pamelamyers9613 5 років тому +4

    Enough UPCI have attempted to prosletyze me, so that I am able validate, they DO NOT accept CONFESSION of Jesus Christ, as evidence of an individual's salvation, but will STRIVE to CV convince the person , his baptism may not be valid, being born of God's Spirit is not enough--evidence of salvation is speaking in tongues; and NONE of this valid Scripturally.
    "Whosoever calls on the Name of the LORD, shall be saved."

    • @jbean530
      @jbean530 5 років тому

      Agree. It's a strange belief. It's a very strong belief not found anywhere in scripture.

  • @andretresvant
    @andretresvant 11 місяців тому

    There was scripture written before about the Son and also John prophetically before they physically existed, The Son Jesus found himself in Isaiah 61 and John said he’s the voice of one crying in the wilderness Isaiah 40:3 , they both read scripture spoken to them before they were here in flesh

  • @pamelamyers9613
    @pamelamyers9613 5 років тому +2

    The reason for Council in Nicene, was to address the teaching of a priest, 8n Alexandria, who was teaching that the Father was "greater," than the Son. Jesus, himself, instructs us to pray to his Father, in his Name. Further, he said to Apostles, It is good, that I go away, my Father with send the Holy Ghost.

    • @Dale65378
      @Dale65378 Рік тому +2

      The Spirit of God who is the Lord Jesus Christ is greater then the fleshly son nature of the true the Lord Jesus Christ the Lord Jesus Christ is God the Father found written in John 14:9
      King James Version
      9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father? Amen. Now do not be like the Evangelist Philip and ask the Lord Jesus to show us the Father because Jesus had already shown he is the Father in John 14:9 Amen.

  • @LEGASItv
    @LEGASItv 3 роки тому +1

    Walter and Cal are clear here :) For more recent debate with oneness, I recommend the one with James White and Michael Brown.

  • @BoastfulDread56
    @BoastfulDread56 5 років тому +3

    Heb 1:8
    But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
    Heb 1:9
    Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows. Act 13:13
    Now when Paul and his company loosed from Paphos, they came to Perga in Pamphylia: and John departing from them returned to Jerusalem. Psa 2:7
    I will declare the decree: the LORD hath said unto me, Thou art my Son; this day have I begotten thee. Heb 1:5
    For unto which of the angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee? And again, I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son? Mat 16:17
    And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. Mat 17:5
    While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him. Mat 26:63
    But Jesus held his peace. And the high priest answered and said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God.
    Mat 26:64
    Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven. 2Jo 1:3
    Grace be with you, mercy, and peace, from God the Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father, in truth and love.1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;”
    Mat 27:45
    Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land unto the ninth hour.
    Mat 27:46
    And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?if there is no son whwy would the father ask himself that question. Mat 26:36
    Then cometh Jesus with them unto a place called Gethsemane, and saith unto the disciples, Sit ye here, while I go and pray yonder. Mat 26:42
    He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, thy will be done.if theres only one up in heaven how do u explain these scriptures then.i could go on and on but i think the oneness gets the point.the oneness is of the devil.s.c> johson was a lie gino jennings is a lie.and if you oneness dont repent your going to wake up in hell.

    • @cruiser84
      @cruiser84 2 роки тому

      1 My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? why art thou so far from helping me, and from the words of my roaring
      (Psalm 22:1)
      Jesus answer on the cross what David write about Him.

    • @Scott48-w9i
      @Scott48-w9i Рік тому

      @@cruiser84 Jesus was not forsaken Psalm 22:24

  • @barryjones9362
    @barryjones9362 3 роки тому

    the stronger point made by the UPC was that the personal pronouns God uses in the OT bespeak a single "person", not merely "being", and Beisner/Martin did not defeat that point by simply decreeing that such pronouns are God merely speaking from his "being". The divinity speaking in the OT is giving the originally intended addressees the notion that he is a "person", whether or not this would create headaches for Trinitarianism.

  • @strollin161
    @strollin161 4 місяці тому

    The trinity side lost me when they admitted they came from the Catholic Church.

  • @Friseal1
    @Friseal1 6 років тому +1

    Mr. Beisner makes a great point when he uses the Epistle of Barnabas to illustrate the early Church believed the Father was addressing the Son when Genesis reads, "Let us make man in our image." The Epistle of Barnabas! The very allegorical epistle of Barnabas?!? Really??? Barnabas 6:12 reads, "For the Scripture speaks about us when he says to the Son: 'Let us make man according to our image and likeness, and let them rule over the beasts of the earth and the birds of the air and the fish of the sea.' And when he saw that our creation was good, the Lord said: 'Increase and multiply and fill the earth.' These things he said to the Son." Wow! That pretty much sums it up, doesn't it! But does it? First off, the letter is anonymous. We don't really know who wrote it. Scholars believe it was originally written in the first century AD, some time after the Fall of Jerusalem (AD 70) but before the city was rebuilt by Hadrian following the revolt of AD 132-135. The text we have today is reconstructed on the basis of Codex Sinaiticus (4th century AD), Codex Hierosolymitanus (AD 1056), and a group of nine late Greek manuscripts, and still later Latin manuscripts. So the best (and possibly earliest) manuscript evidence we have is from the 4th century, well after the doctrine of the Trinity had been formulated. Surely no overly zealous scribe would have tampered with the text adding in some biased verbiage (cf. 1 Jn 5:7 manuscript evidence)! Surely not. Oh! And this is the same book that reads "Learn abundantly, therefore, children of love, about everything: Abraham, who first instituted circumcision, looked forward in the spirit to Jesus when he circumcised, having received the teaching of the three letters. For it says, 'And Abraham circumcised ten and eight and three hundred men of his household.' What, then, is the knowledge that was given to him? Observe that it mentions the 'ten and eight' first, and then after an interval the 'three hundred.' As for the 'ten and eight,' the I is ten and the H is eight; thus you have 'Jesus.' And because the cross, which is shaped like the T, was destined to convey grace, it mentions also the 'three hundred.' So he reveals Jesus in the two letters, and the cross in the other one. He who placed within us the implanted gift of his convent understands. No one has ever learned from me a more reliable word, but I know that you are worth of it (Barnabas 9:7-9). It's clear from this passage that the author is working from the LXX - the Greek translation of the OT Hebrew. In Greek, the alphabet can have numerical values: A = 1, B=2, etc. here H=8, I=10, and T=100. Thus, he concludes the IH (eight and ten) represents Jesus since IH is the first two letters (and not an uncommon abbreviation) of the Greek spelling of JESUS. But is this truly valid, or a very wild, allegorical interpretation? Exactly when did Abraham circumcise 118 of his men? Gen 14:14 mentions that number, and Gen 17:23 records him circumcising his household but makes no reference to a number. Yet this is "a more reliable word" when its not even recorded in Scripture? Therefore it seems most reasonable to conclude this is just a lot of allegorical rhetoric by the author. And if he writes fluff like this, we're supposed to believe he's writing the truth about a perceived conversation between the Father and the Son in Genesis? I think not. That Beisner and Martin resort to this level of argumentation is yet another tell-tale sign of their weak position. Both sides were not very convincing, but the Trinitarian side in this particular debate was exceptionally weak.

  • @paulrm_7917
    @paulrm_7917 6 років тому +3

    Get em Dr. Walt! You the man!

  • @stephenhaskell273
    @stephenhaskell273 5 років тому +2

    Somebody please explain to me why dr Martin says there is no such thing as the eternal son of God

    • @codymarkley8372
      @codymarkley8372 4 роки тому +6

      Jesus is not generated by God, he is God. So eternal generation theory posits Christ as a derivative and not a coequal personage.

    • @christophercummings4502
      @christophercummings4502 2 роки тому +1

      @@codymarkley8372 Beautifully explained Mr. Markley

  • @mattmiller237
    @mattmiller237 4 роки тому +2

    Was the thief on the cross baptized? Was he saved?

    • @ronlong5503
      @ronlong5503 Рік тому

      I understood that when you accept Christ you are baptized in the spirit. Good point about the thief on the cross.

  • @ricardogarcia3444
    @ricardogarcia3444 5 років тому +7

    17:30 Christ desended to planet earth in the times of Noah 1 Peter 3:16-18 hello Jesus existed before he was born hello

    • @andalusianguitarist
      @andalusianguitarist 5 років тому +1

      The one who existed prior to the Incarnation was the Word who was with God and was God. When he arrived on earth he was named Jesus Christ. Jesus Christ is the monogenesis Theos which = the Divine Spirit + the genetics of his human mother Mary. This combination of the Holy Spirit and human genetics was not present prior to the incarnation. See Revelation 4 the one sitting on the throne and the 7 Spirits of God is a veiled form of the Word just as he was also in veiled form as revealed in the burning bush in Exodus 3 when Moses spoke to the Angel of the Lord who stated that he was the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
      Prior to the Incarnation he was the Word or Alpha which = Eternal Father # 2 who was with God and was also God as stated in John 1:1. Jesus spoke of the former glory that he had with the father as the Word in John 17.

    • @ricardogarcia3444
      @ricardogarcia3444 5 років тому

      andalusianguitarist ok good but 1 Peter 3:16-18 It says Christ desended to earth in the days of Noah ok Christ= Word yes good

    • @andalusianguitarist
      @andalusianguitarist 5 років тому

      @@ricardogarcia3444 All the dealings of God with his people in the past were conducted by the Angel of the Lord which was the pre existent Word = Christ. See 1 Corinthians 10
      www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+10%3A1-4&version=RSV
      But I believe that what you are referring to is 1 Peter 3:18-20. What this is basically saying is that by Noah's preaching Christ was speaking to them and the quickening of the spirit implies the resurrection of Jesus Christ made that preaching possible since we are reconciled by his death but saved by his life. See Romans 5:10 the second part of the verse.
      www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Romans+5%3A10&version=RSV

  • @thereisnopandemic
    @thereisnopandemic 5 років тому +2

    Dr Walter destroyed Sabin, Sabin needs to take Grammar classes and language arts. His understanding of how basic language works is at a level of some elementary child. How these guys get doctorates degrees is beyond me. I wonder why Dr Walter reads to them in Koine Greek, Sabin can barely understand how pronouns, nouns, adjectives works in basic English language.

  • @Friseal1
    @Friseal1 6 років тому +2

    Dr. Martin emotionally and expressively denies that concept of plurals of majesty citing they were not even used until the 13th century. I find it interesting, then, that Trinitarian Charles Caldwell Ryrie, Th.D., Ph.D., writes in his Bible Study Notes at Genesis 1:26, "us...our. Plurals of majesty." It is quite funny that Dr. Martin would unintentionally contradict another trinitarian bible scholar, far more published and esteemed than himself, with such a glaring statement. Gesenius and many Hebrew grammarians have all traditionally written that the OT plurals are examples of "plurals of excellence." Modern trinitarians are disengaging from this line of argumentation because they understand its failures. Each occurrence of "mother-in-law" in the Book or Ruth is chamoth which is a Hebrew femanine plural even while only one singular person is in view; thus, it's a clear example of the Plural of Majesty being using far earlier than the 13th century as Dr. Martin contends. Furthermore, Gen. 24:10 uses adonim (masters-plural) to refer to a singular person. Dr. Martin was just plain in error on this point. Again, this does not outright refute Trinitarianism, but shows the inherent weakness the doctrine has in trying to adequately explain the Being of God.

    • @Dale65378
      @Dale65378 Рік тому

      Where does the Holy righteous King James Bible says there is a trinity?

  • @cruiser84
    @cruiser84 2 роки тому

    The (word=tora/laws)was with God. It's a promise of God and he honor his word. God is not divided.

  • @ronlong5503
    @ronlong5503 Рік тому

    Man is body, soul and spirit and we are one . Why can they grasp father,son and spirit as one. The church has many parts but one body. Jesus is the head and the church is the body. We are one with the spirit. They can't grasp the oneness. Because you have to have the holy spirit to understand. The holy spirit will teach you.

  • @Set-Apart-By-Grace
    @Set-Apart-By-Grace 2 роки тому

    That's the problem with the Pentecostals...they are stuck in the Old Testament, not considering the New Testament that reveals the Old. The revealing, they haven't grasped. The New, wasn't written when Jesus walked on earth, of course! He, was the revealing...the fulfillment.

    • @Dale65378
      @Dale65378 Рік тому +2

      Hi Hi do you see the True the Lord Jesus Christ is God the Father within John 14:9
      King James Version
      9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father? Amen.

  • @ronlong5503
    @ronlong5503 Рік тому

    God is Elohim. Elohim is plural used in a singular meaning.

  • @Dale65378
    @Dale65378 Рік тому

    Martin Walter is very confused he claims that he does not believe that God the Father and Jesus Christ are separate gods. Yet Martin Walter tries to confirm that God the Father is separate from the Lord Jesus Christ my question would be to Martin Walter how can the Lord Jesus Christ be separate to God the Father and Jesus still be called God when Isaiah 45:5 only refers to as there only being one True God and not a separate God? If you call Jesus God then you say Jesus is separate to God the Father you are in fact saying there are 2 true gods which is not supported in the holy King James Bible and Martin Walter would be a liar when Martin Walter he claims that he does not believe that God the Father and Jesus Christ are separate gods.

    • @Scott48-w9i
      @Scott48-w9i Рік тому

      Jesus is a God the Father was unseen the Son is a different God but is called the Everlasting Father

  • @pamelamyers9613
    @pamelamyers9613 5 років тому +2

    God, the Father; God, the Son, and, God, the Holy Ghost, are not three in one: But One in three.

  • @timjones8204
    @timjones8204 3 роки тому +1

    if Jesus was crucified before the foundations of the Earth when was he born the first time was he raised in heaven how was he begotten what was his begotten State before he as the son came to Earth and was begotten of Mary through the flesh by the spirit was Jesus a little boy in heaven was he always an adult she always God how do they coexist when there's none beside me I am only one hero Israel I am one

    • @Scott48-w9i
      @Scott48-w9i Рік тому

      There was no God beside Jesus the father was unseen

  • @gustavmahler1466
    @gustavmahler1466 4 роки тому

    Is Martin Walter saying Jesus is not the eternal son???

    • @codymarkley8372
      @codymarkley8372 4 роки тому

      The idea of eternal generation is that God eternally sustained Jesus divinity. This denies the nature of Jesus as being God completely but a sort of derivative. Instead of God giving jesus divinity it should be realized that Jesus was fully God, as God could not change from not-father, to father, just like the son could be God, but also derivative of God. I dont know if this helps.

    • @Scott48-w9i
      @Scott48-w9i Рік тому

      @@codymarkley8372 Jesus hasn't always been the Son 1 Chronicles 17:13 KJV

  • @dennismaher9533
    @dennismaher9533 6 місяців тому

    TRINITY WINS AGAIN

  • @kryptoego
    @kryptoego 8 років тому

    The Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed (381 A.D.) says: _"We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible; and in one _*_LORD JESUS CHRIST, THE SON OF GOD,_*_ the Only-begotten, _*_BEGOTTEN OF THE FATHER BEFORE ALL AGES,_*_ Light of Light, Very God of Very God, _*_BEGOTTEN_*_ [γεννηθέντα], _*_NOT MADE;_*_ of one essence with the Father, by whom all things were made ..."._ Since in God there can be no change (in Malachi 3:6 He affirms: _"I the Lord do not change."),_ it means that God must've ALWAYS been Father, Son and Holy Spirit, or else, if God would've gotten the attributes of being Father and Son at some point in time, or at the Incarnation, as Dr. Walter Martin claimed, it would mean that a certain change would've been produced in God. This means that, even though he confessed that God exists in three eternal Persons, since he rejected the teaching that Lord Jesus was always "the Son of God" (begotten before all ages), but accepted to call Him only as "the Word of God" before Incarnation (the event in time when He would've become the Son), Dr. Martin actually held to a different doctrine about the Holy Trinity than the orthodox (traditional) Christianity always did.

    • @andalusianguitarist
      @andalusianguitarist 5 років тому +1

      Problem is that John 1:1 doesn't mention a Father son relationship there was only the original Two. It doesn't say 3.

    • @andalusianguitarist
      @andalusianguitarist 5 років тому

      In Revelation 22:1 we then see the restoration of the original two in the form of the throne of God and the Lamb. Fact is that prior to the Incarnation Christ was God just as the Father is God both were equal, this is clearly stated in Philippians 2:5-7. Christ later lowered himself by taking the slave form of human genetics which = sonship from the context of John 1:14 and Romans 1:3 which is the seed of David according to the flesh.
      www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Philippians+2%3A6-8&version=RSV

    • @sasquatchmeridian3094
      @sasquatchmeridian3094 5 років тому

      Greece MyLove: if your 'God' never changes he could not have been born Yeshua of Nazareth. Nor could your 'God' have died on the cross for that is certainly a change from being alive. Your God is the confusion of Babylon. The trinity idol in your is forehead marking you as a servant of the beast. Settle there and you will be lost.

  • @stephenhaskell273
    @stephenhaskell273 5 років тому

    Is this guy serious?

  • @anthonybardsley4985
    @anthonybardsley4985 4 роки тому

    In johns gospel it say in the beginning was the word. Was towards God and indeed was God. To me that sounds like one God only.Jesus was God incarnate begotten upon the earth.if jesus is a seperate God to God then this is entirely polytheistic.immortality came through the gospel we are not erernal until. GOD IMMORTALISED US.

    • @Scott48-w9i
      @Scott48-w9i Рік тому

      But that is what scripture teaches two different Gods

  • @paulmoua8723
    @paulmoua8723 3 роки тому

    HERE IS MY GOD AND MY FATHER WHOM I BELIEVE: ACCORDING TO ISAIAH 9:6 THE LORD JESUS CHRIST IS THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. THAT MEANS JESUS CHRIST IS THE ONE TRUE GOD WHO HAS THE TITLES OF THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. HERE IS A PROOF FROM THE LORD JESUS CHRIST THAT HE CLAIMED TO BE THE FATHER: JOHN 14:9 JESUS SAID, "He who has seen Me has seen the Father." And John 12:45 Jesus said, "He that seeth Me seeth Him that sent Me." Meaning Jesus was the one who sent Himself. And John 10:30 Jesus said, "I and my Father are one." This is what Jesus meant: My Father and I am the same person. And Jesus claimed to be the Father according to John 8:24 Jesus said, "For if you believe not that I AM HE, you shall die in your sins." And Jesus is the Holy Spirit according 2 Corinthians 3:17 says, "Now the Lord(Jesus) is that Spirit: and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty." And according to Revelation 2:18,29 The Lord Jesus Christ is the Holy Spirit. And according to 1 Corinthians 1:24 says, "But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the Power of God, and the Wisdom of God." Since Jesus Christ is the Power of God, and the Wisdom of God, then where is God and who is Jesus Christ? In Reality, Jesus is the Father according to Isaiah 9:6; John 14:9; John 12:45; John 8:24 and John 10:30. I prayed for two full years and I cried for two full years just wanted to know who the Lord Jesus Christ is. And then I saw the Lord Jesus Christ in the spirit and He told me that He is the Father. I said to Jesus to give me a scripture proof from the bible telling me that Jesus is the Father, otherwise, I will not believe Him, because if my friend ask me, "What is your scripture proof that Jesus is the Father?" If I don't have the scripture proof then they will not believe me. Jesus said to me, "Go head and read Isaiah 9:6 then you will know that I am the Father because I am the truth and I am not lying to you." After that I picked my King James Bible and started to read Isaiah 9:6 saying, "For unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given, the government shall be upon His shoulder: His name shall be called Wonderful, Counselor, The Mighty God, The Everlasting Father, and The Prince of Peace." After I had read Isaiah 9:6 I knew for sure that the Lord Jesus Christ is the Father 1000% sure in my heart and the Lord Jesus Christ has been my only God and Father from since until now. If Jesus had not told me that truth about Him, then I would still have been spiritually blind until now. So from now on if any of you there have problem of knowing who is the true God, then pray and cry and talk to the Lord Jesus Christ ok! Remember that the Lord Jesus is the one true God. Jesus is the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Jesus is one true God and He is one person who has three titles such Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. After I was born of the Spirit of God and when I was baptized with His Holy Fire Jesus talked to me from my heart saying, "I am your Lord Jesus who is your Father and you are my child. Do not be afraid, I will be with you forever." At that time I was so glad and I jumped up and down and I shout very loud saying, "Hallelujah, glory to my Lord and my God, Jesus Christ, you are my Everlasting Father, Amen! ADVICE TO ALL WHO SEEKING GOD: TRUST IN THE LORD WITH ALL YOUR HEART AND LEAN NOT UNTO YOUR OWN UNDERSTANDING, IN ALL YOUR WAYS AKNOWLEDGE HIM AND HE SHALL DIRECT YOUR PATHS ACCORDING TO PROVERBS 3:5-6. PLEASE DON'T EVER THINK THAT YOU ARE TOO SMART AND YOUR EDUCATION IS TOO HIGH TO FIND YOUR WAY TO HEAVEN. BUT SEEK JESUS AND ASK HIM FOR HELP OK! PEACE! THANKS! REMEMBER THAT GOD IS NOT TRINITY! GOD IS NOT THREE DISTINCT PERSONS. GOD IS ONE, NOT THREE BECAUSE #1. THE PERSONAL NAME OF THE FATHER IS JESUS. #2. THE PERSONAL NAME OF THE SON IS JESUS. #3. THE PERSONAL NAME OF THE HOLY SPIRIT IS JESUS. THIS IS THE REALITY: WHENEVER JESUS TALKS ABOUT THE FATHER, HE IS TALKING ABOUT HIS OWN SPIRIT. JESUS LOVES TO ENCOURAGE ALL BELIEVERS TO RESPECT AND WORSHIP THE FATHER BECAUSE JESUS IS THE FATHER SPIRITUALLY. JESUS' SPIRIT IS THE FATHER AND HIS BODY IS OF THE FATHER AS WELL. JESUS HAS SPIRIT, SOUL, AND BODY. ONE GOD, ONE PERSON, ONE BODY OK! THAT'S WHY JESUS IS THE FATHER, JESUS IS THE SON, AND JESUS IS THE HOLY SPIRIT. JESUS IS ONE GOD AND ONE PERSON AND ALL HIS THREE TITLES ONLY SHARE ONE PERSONAL NAME: JESUS. THE LORD JESUS CHRIST IS THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT, THAT IS WHY PETER AND PAUL BAPTIZED THE BELIEVERS IN THE NAME OF JESUS, INSTEAD OF THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT OK! IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME PLEASE TALK AND CRY TO THE LORD JESUS CHRIST AND HE WILL TELL YOU OK! DO YOU REMEMBER WHAT THE LORD JESUS HAD SAID IN THE BIBLE THIS: JESUS SAID, "NO ONE KNOWS WHO THE FATHER IS, EXCEPT THE SON, AND NO ONE KNOWS WHO THE SON IS, EXCEPT THE FATHER, AND THE SON WILL CHOOSE TO TELL WHOMEVER WHO THE FATHER IS ACCORDING TO LUKE 10:22. GLORY TO THE LORD JESUS CHRIST! PEACE! AMEN!

  • @Papasquatch73
    @Papasquatch73 4 роки тому

    Jews had a view of two powers of heaven until 2nd c ad

  • @timjones8204
    @timjones8204 3 роки тому

    is God schizophrenic?

  • @jondailey9510
    @jondailey9510 3 роки тому

    Jesus is the first and the last

  • @kenfollowyeshuacrawford4284
    @kenfollowyeshuacrawford4284 2 роки тому

    God the Father was not resurrected from the Dead! Jesus Christ was resurrected from the Dead! God the Father is not the same person Jesus Christ who was resurrected from the Dead! God the Father is not the resurrected Jesus Christ! Oneness theology is unbiblical heresy.

    • @scottgrey2877
      @scottgrey2877 2 роки тому

      Oneness believe there is a distinction between father and son

  • @sasquatchmeridian3094
    @sasquatchmeridian3094 5 років тому

    Put a set of letters before any man's name, dress him in a suit and set him up as an authority and what do we have? Everything the bible warns us about! The trinity is the mark of the beast, the one that is found in your forehead if you do not not know the one true God, and his son, the Lord Jesus Christ you will wear the mark in your forehead (what God you worship)
    Jesus Christ had a God when he ate bread with his disciples - Christ has a God now, in heaven, whom he is seated next to on a heavenly throne. Dies Christ worship himself? If you listen carefully to all Walter says, you will find that most of what he says is rehashed poor theology at best.. it is not biblical nor is it biblically sound. This man, if he was not a catholic Jesuit plant, pushed, aided and abetted the Roman mother's agenda while she didn't have to raise a finger.. to get all her wayward daughters, the Protestant 'Christian' churches to worship her cornerstone dogma. The forehead is your mind. Who or what is foremost in your mind is the God or gods you worship. If you worship the mystery of the trinity mystery Babylon is in your forehead.

    • @joseguinto7630
      @joseguinto7630 5 років тому +2

      Ummmm the mark of the beast is 666 not 3 if we are to play with sinbels the Jews use the number7as a perfect number but we in recent centuries we use 10 as the perfect number

    • @sasquatchmeridian3094
      @sasquatchmeridian3094 5 років тому

      Jose Guinto :Read what the prophet *actually* wrote, we have been hoodwinked for far too long, by years of meddling with what scripture actually says...a lot of Protestants are teethed on the rather lurid illustrations of men and woman in agony bearing a brand of 666.
      Now the last part of the scroll is being revealed, we must listen very carefully and be given the eye salve to see...or we will believe the lie because we do not love truth enough. Carefully re- examine what John *actually* wrote:
      . " ...to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. HERE is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast..."
      Do you see? You will receive a mark in your right hand or forehead to be allowed to continue in commerce, but you also may receive the NAME of the beast OR the NUMBER of his name. Having the mark in your hand is symbolic of what you do..what a man performs. If you worship on a pagan sun day instead of the sabbath, if you do not keep the sabbath apart, remembering your creator, you are worshipping an image, not the true God. If you believe in the mother's triune gods then you will bear the mark in your forehead, who it is in your mind you worship. You have accepted the antichrist image instead of the real son of God himself. Those who worship another 'Jesus' a God-man..as God almighty.. worship the antichrist.
      You have the mark of the beast and worship its image by believing in a false God or gods, by worshipping falsely, on a day that is not holy to God or by trying to work your way into heaven. If you worship another God or another Jesus you will have the name or the number of his name..
      Anyone who does not keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus will not be sealed in their foreheads by the indwelling of God's spirit. They will take a mark, or have the beast's name or his number...it matters not where or which you get, once you settle into complete rejection of the one true God you cannot know the son and cannot be sealed by the Holy Spirit and be saved.
      No need to play with symbols, the bible will interpret prophecy for you if you are given the eyes salve. Without it you will continually seek but never find for you cannot know the things of God until you are no longer seeking the things of the flesh, but of the spirit. Ask God to give you wisdom, to give you His own spirit to dwell in you. Seek Him for all you are worth to worship Him in spirit and in truth for this is who the Father is pleased in...commit wholly and turn from worldly things. Truly FOLLOW the son. Endure, for many are called, few are chosen.

    • @joseguinto7630
      @joseguinto7630 5 років тому

      @@sasquatchmeridian3094 reveletion13;15to18 you forgot to mention the last 2lines which reads:for it is the number of a man:hes number is sixHundred threescores meaning one more 3=66so far and last it says Six,Total=666 right or wrong

    • @sasquatchmeridian3094
      @sasquatchmeridian3094 5 років тому

      Jose Guinto: Yes, the numeral quantity of the man's name is 666 - BUT you are not reading the text FOR WHAT IT SAYS...the numeral quantity of a man's name is only there to give you a clue as to WHO the man of sin / the antichrist MIGHT BE. His name will numerically make up the 666 numerals...666 is not the mark which will appear, literally, tattooed or stamped on anyone's hand or brow. Ask God to give you spiritual eyes to see. The numerals are only clueing you in as to who might be the beast's FALSE CHRIST.
      We are down to the wire, there is only a few more grains in the hourglass..we have to truly worship the Father in spirit and in truth or we will not be sealed by his seal in our foreheads and we will be deceived into wearing a mark in the hand, or forehead or receive the number or name of the beast...while mainstream 'Christianity' yammers on about how non trins cannot call ourselves 'Christian' - if we don't have the trinity idol in our minds... they totally reject or neglect the words of scripture...that we are known by our fruits.
      Commit wholly. Seek truth. Ask for God's own spirit to open your eyes and ears, because without being reborn in spirit, we are as deaf and dumb as newborn beasts. Spiritual things we cannot see nor understand. Most of what scripture truly says will go right over our heads. We can call ourselves Christian, trinitarian or not, all the day long..it will avail us not. Christ will not know us if we are workers of iniquity.
      The devil has had Millenia to outwit, outsmart us. There are two commandments of God most of the self professed 'Christian' community refuses to acknowledge that they have trampled upon. The sabbath law and the very first commandment. If the sabbath was made for man, why was it done away with? And the only law of the ten disposed of...out of all the others? Why put it in the ten at all if God intended it should be swapped for another day, ignored or profaned?
      In scripture you will find that what you do, what a man's actions are: are signified by his arm or hand. If your actions are to worship on any other day that the sabbath, the last day of the week..you are receiving the beast's mark in your hand. If you are worshipping the three Gods who you must not call three Gods but one, then you have taken the beast mark in your forehead. The one true living God is not made up of 'persons'.
      Any one who worships an idol or false gods or God, receives the mark in their forehead..in their minds..who or what they worship, then they have not the one true living God in their minds.. a false idol or idols reside where the Father is supposed to reign supreme.
      The 666 only has been revealed to reveal the man of sin. If you worship "another Jesus" instead of the one Paul, Matthew and Peter followed, then you have received the name. Seek and you will find, knock and the door will be opened. Decide you are right and I am wrong if you please, but please commit yourself today, wholly as a living sacrifice into God and seek to have true knowledge of Him..we have so little time..

    • @joseguinto7630
      @joseguinto7630 5 років тому

      @@sasquatchmeridian3094 it never gets old protestants like you always quoting the holy bible and what Jesus says but you or the rest of you just quote those words to your own advantage and peace of mind but Jesus said he who eats my flest and drinks my blood should have eternal life tell me something do you or all the evangelicals of the world follow that