So viele Geschwister hatte Jesus wirklich

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лют 2025
  • Auch gut zu dem Thema: • The Perpetual Virginit...
    • Was Mary a Perpetual V...
    ---------------------------------------
    Meine Bücher:
    K.und K. auf dem Jakobsweg (Katze und Katechismus) amzn.eu/d/dBmnAoQ
    Per Bär nach Rom amzn.eu/d/3Rk4GgL
    Tod in Trastevere www.thalia.de/...
    Zwei Katzen auf dem Jakobsweg: amzn.eu/d/evJeRVC
    Eine Katze auf dem Jakobsweg: amzn.eu/d/aYmaRsi
    Goldi geht den Jakobsweg: buchshop.bod.d...
    ---------------------------------------

КОМЕНТАРІ • 196

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 місяці тому +1

    ​ @felesamabilis *Where in Luk **10:16** Mat **16:19** says "submit to Roman popes to be saved"? Are you sure you can read?* 🤣🤣🤣
    you said
    Luke 10,16 Mathew 16,19

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @faithalone2171 OK dude, submit only to Peter. Ou you can't because you are not allowed to contact dead people. Ou you can't obey to Jesus words. So pitty. You won't be saved because you lay away Jesus commanments

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 місяці тому +1

      ​ @felesamabilis *You failed to answer once again .. Where in Luk **10:16** Mat **16:19** says "submit to Roman popes to be saved"? Are you sure you can read?* 🤣🤣🤣
      you said
      Luke 10,16 Mathew 16,19

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 місяці тому +1

      @@felesamabilis *Where in Luk **10:16** and Mat **16:18** says "submit to Peter to be saved"? Where?*
      you said
      OK dude, submit only to Peter.

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 місяці тому +1

      @@felesamabilis *There is no commandment to "submit to Peter to be saved" though. So?*
      you said
      You won't be saved because you lay away Jesus commanments

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 місяці тому +1

      @@felesamabilis *Why do RCs keepL?*

  • @browncony3897
    @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +1

    @felesamabilis *Thank you for admitting your error. 🤣🤣🤣 Bible does not teach mm doctrine of Rome called "Penance". Bible teaches "Repentance".*
    *Bible says Jesus did it to "fulfill all righteousness", Mat **3:15**. So it's a doctrine. Bible does not say that for Mary. So it's not a doctrine and your claim is invalid. If your claim is true, then all Js must be sinless too since they all went through the rituals.*
    you said
    orry, English is only my 4th language. Yes, repentance. Jesus didn't do it because He was without sin but ALTHOUGH..

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      Well, to your other lies I will come in next videos 😂 Wait a sec. What was the best one? "Bible teaches confessing only to God"... Guess again 😂😂😂

    • @starlightmusic8414
      @starlightmusic8414 2 місяці тому +1

      ​ @felesamabilis *You failed to answer again to the mm doctrines of Rome. Thank you for admitting your error. 🤣🤣🤣 Bible does not teach mm doctrine of Rome called "Penance". Bible teaches "Repentance".*
      *Bible says Jesus did it to "fulfill all righteousness", Mat **3:15**. So it's a doctrine. Bible does not say that for Mary. So it's not a doctrine and your claim is invalid. If your claim is true, then all Js must be sinless too since they all went through the rituals.*
      you said
      orry, English is only my 4th language. Yes, repentance. Jesus didn't do it because He was without sin but ALTHOUGH...

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @starlightmusic8414 go drink a beer and keep calm. All other lies you posted would be explained. I just do my work detailed and it takes time not like your copying again and again the same nonsense

    • @starlightmusic8414
      @starlightmusic8414 2 місяці тому +1

      @@felesamabilis *Your endless blatherings do not prove doctrines! Next!*
      you said
      go drink a beer and keep calm. All other lies you posted would be explained. I just do my work detailed and it takes time not like your copying again and again the same nonsense

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      Come back when you have any logical arguments 😂

  • @browncony3897
    @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +2

    @felesamabilis *You failed to answer once again ... Jesus and Apostles all took doctrines from Scriptures Only. 180 plus verses say so. Which one of them is 16th century? Lol. So many early writers mentioned the Exact Words "Scripture Alone". Which one of them was 16th century? 🤣🤣🤣*
    31 Verses Found, 31 Matches on the word “Scripture”
    21 Verses Found, 21 Matches on the word “Scriptures
    127 Verses Found, 132 Matches on the words “it is written” referring to Written Word/Scriptures.

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      Read 1 Thes 2,13 and 2 Thes 2,15

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      You failed to quote biblical verses for "Scripture only"

    • @browncony3897
      @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@felesamabilis *1. The issue has never been "traditions of Jesus and APostles, 2 Thes **2:15**".*
      Jesus/Scriptures/SS DOES ACCEPT "traditions of Jesus and APostles". Luther when he first brought back SS, he did not REJECT these either. How we know that? Luther clearly accepted Scriptures, Communion, ...
      *2. The issue has always been "traditions of men, Col 2:8, Mark 7:8, Mat 15, Mat 23" which Jesus/Scriptures/SS REJECTED. This is where 95% of RC doctrines come from.*
      *3. Bible defines "traditions of men" as "doctrines not from the commandments of God/Jesus", Col 2:8, Mark 7:8. What are "commandments of God/Jesus"? Scriptures. These verses prove Sola Scriptura too.*
      *4. Example of traditions of men" in Roman Catholicism.*
      God/Jesus did not command RCs to make statues and to bow down to them. RCs made lots of statues and bow down to all of them. That's clearly not from the "commandments of God/Jesus. Clearly "traditions of men".
      Mar 7:8 *For laying aside the commandment of God* , you hold the *tradition of men* -the washing of pitchers and cups, and many other such things you do."
      Col 2:8 Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the *tradition of men* , according to the basic principles of the world, and *not according to Christ*
      you said
      Read 1 Thes 2,13 and 2 Thes 2,15

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      yes of course 😂 spoken means written. Failed again. There were no Scripture when Thes wa s written. Try again.
      Your lie about bowing comes next. Dont worry

    • @starlightmusic8414
      @starlightmusic8414 2 місяці тому +1

      ​ @felesamabilis *Again rehashing refuted stuff.*
      *1. The issue has never been "traditions of Jesus and APostles, 2 Thes **2:15**".*
      Jesus/Scriptures/SS DOES ACCEPT "traditions of Jesus and APostles". Luther when he first brought back SS, he did not REJECT these either. How we know that? Luther clearly accepted Scriptures, Communion, ....
      *2. The issue has always been "traditions of men, Col 2:8, Mark 7:8, Mat 15, Mat 23" which Jesus/Scriptures/SS REJECTED. This is where 95% of RC doctrines come from.*
      *3. Bible defines "traditions of men" as "doctrines not from the commandments of God/Jesus", Col 2:8, Mark 7:8. What are "commandments of God/Jesus"? Scriptures. These verses prove Sola Scriptura too.*
      *4. Example of traditions of men" in Roman Catholicism.*
      God/Jesus did not command RCs to make statues and to bow down to them. RCs made lots of statues and bow down to all of them. That's clearly not from the "commandments of God/Jesus. Clearly "traditions of men".
      Mar 7:8 *For laying aside the commandment of God* , you hold the *tradition of men* -the washing of pitchers and cups, and many other such things you do."
      Col 2:8 Beware lest anyone cheat you through philosophy and empty deceit, according to the *tradition of men* , according to the basic principles of the world, and *not according to Christ*
      you said
      Read 1 Thes 2,13 and 2 Thes 2,15

  • @solafide9533
    @solafide9533 2 місяці тому +2

    *If Roman Catholicism is truth or Church of the Bible, why was there not a single New Covenant believer saved in a Roman Catholic way in the whole Bible? Why is that so? Please explain coherently intelligently.* 🤣🤣🤣
    - submit to Roman pope to be saved
    - devote to Roman Mary to be saved
    - be in Roman Church to be saved
    - partake Roman sacraments to be saved
    - baptise in Roman baptism to be saved
    - do lots of works to be saved

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      Well, only the Holy Spirit can open your eyes if you still don't see the necessity of submitting to Peter in the Bible.

    • @MeowMeow-jt8mo
      @MeowMeow-jt8mo 2 місяці тому +1

      @@felesamabilis *You are seek. Where in the Bible teaches that?*

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @@MeowMeow-jt8mo what do I seek?

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @@MeowMeow-jt8mo you should seek a good optician if you still don't understand the keys of Heaven in Peters hands

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @@MeowMeow-jt8mo already watched the Immaculata-video? Or are you chickening out? Still waiting there for you that you could refute ANY SINGLE of my prrofs :D

  • @browncony3897
    @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +1

    @felesamabilis *1. In all the 346 usages of NT, not once Adelphos was used as cousin. 2. LXX was merely a Greek translation of Hebrew OT. It was only in Hebrews that the word "brother" meant cousin. Not the Greek NT. We are discussing NT, why do you bring in OT (originally written in Hebrews). 3. Adelphos is just like a common word in English "brother". Not cousin. 4. If they really wanted to mean cousin, they would use "anepsios" or "sungenis". You failed to prove anything once again. 🤣*

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      Of course it was used as cousin. I just proved Joses and Jacobus were cousins from Jesus, because their mother was cousin from Jesus' mother. 😂 What didn't you understand 😂

    • @browncony3897
      @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +2

      @@felesamabilis *Really? Cite me one chap verse that says they were "cousins" and not "brothers". Just one:*
      1
      2
      3
      you said
      Of course it was used as cousin. I just proved Joses and Jacobus were cousins from Jesus, because their mother was cousin from Jesus' mother. 😂 What didn't you understand 😂

    • @solafide9533
      @solafide9533 2 місяці тому +2

      @@felesamabilis *All my points remain unchallenged ...*
      1. In all the 346 usages of NT, not once Adelphos was used as cousin. 2. LXX was merely a Greek translation of Hebrew OT. It was only in Hebrews that the word "brother" meant cousin. Not the Greek NT. We are discussing NT, why do you bring in OT (originally written in Hebrews). 3. Adelphos is just like a common word in English "brother". Not cousin. 4. If they really wanted to mean cousin, they would use "anepsios" or "sungenis". You failed to prove anything once again. 🤣

  • @browncony3897
    @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +1

    @felesamabilis *You failed to answer once again ... Then explain why Jesus and Apostles took doctrines from Scriptures Only. They always cite "it is written", "as Scriptures say". They did not once say "as traditions say". Why is that so? So who cares about your fallible opinions over infallible Scriptures? 🤣🤣🤣*
    31 Verses Found, 31 Matches on the word “Scripture”
    21 Verses Found, 21 Matches on the word “Scriptures
    127 Verses Found, 132 Matches on the words “it is written” referring to Written Word/Scriptures.
    you said
    Apostles don't teach Sola Scriptura either,

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @@browncony3897 you failed to quote ANY SINGLE Bible Vers which teaches "Scripture alone"

    • @browncony3897
      @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +3

      @@felesamabilis *Again complete lack of knowledge. We do not need Exact Words/Phrases for doctrines. Example: we do not see the Exact Words "trinity" or "one God three Persons" in the Bible, but the doctrine of trinity is still in the Bible, Mat **3:16**.*
      *Doctrines come from the teachings and practices of Jesus and APostles. That's exactly what they did. THey only took doctrines from Scriptures Only. They always cited "it is written", "as Scriptures say". So Scripture Alone is already a doctrine. My point remain unchallenged:*
      31 Verses Found, 31 Matches on the word “Scripture”
      21 Verses Found, 21 Matches on the word “Scriptures
      127 Verses Found, 132 Matches on the words “it is written” referring to Written Word/Scriptures.
      you said
      you failed to quote ANY SINGLE Bible Vers which teaches "Scripture alone

    • @solafide9533
      @solafide9533 2 місяці тому +1

      @felesamabilis *You failed to answer once again ... Then explain why Jesus and Apostles took doctrines from Scriptures Only. They always cite "it is written", "as Scriptures say". They did not once say "as traditions say". Why is that so? So who cares about your fallible opinions over infallible Scriptures? 🤣🤣🤣*
      31 Verses Found, 31 Matches on the word “Scripture”
      21 Verses Found, 21 Matches on the word “Scriptures
      127 Verses Found, 132 Matches on the words “it is written” referring to Written Word/Scriptures.

  • @solafide9533
    @solafide9533 2 місяці тому +1

    *This question has always been hard for RCs to answer. Roman religion teaches "submit to your Roman popes to be saved". Do you believe in suchns? Do you follow this teaching of Rome? If Roman popes are your saviours, why do you need Christ then? Lol* 🤣🤣🤣

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      Stop telling lies.

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 місяці тому +1

      ​ @felesamabilis *What Ls? Your ROman popes taught that. You do not know?* 🤣🤣🤣

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 місяці тому +1

      *Pope Boniface 8th: Salvation if You Submit to Pope*
      1201-1500
      Pope Boniface VIII published a bull on this day, November 18, 1302, titled Unam sanctam. It still generates deep controversy. The bull denies salvation to any human being who does not submit to the Roman Catholic Church and its head, the pope.
      *"...There is one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, outside of which there is neither salvation nor remission of sins..."*
      *"...Indeed we declare, say, pronounce, and define that it is altogether necessary to salvation for every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff."*
      A bull is a solemn papal letter. The form was given this name because it was sealed with a bulla, a round lead seal. This particular bull was written as the latest round in an ongoing war of words between the pope and King Philip IV "the Fair" of France.

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @faithalone2171 Luke 10,16 Mathew 16,19 read it guess again 🤣🤣

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@felesamabilis *Where in Luk **10:16** Mat **16:19** says "submit to Roman popes to be saved"? Are you sure you can read?* 🤣🤣🤣
      you said
      Luke 10,16 Mathew 16,19

  • @browncony3897
    @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +1

    @felesamabilis *Again complete lack of knowledge. I said doctrines, you said sentences. Even kindergarten kids know you are talkingns. 🤣🤣🤣 The only 5% doctrines that are biblical in Roman religion are the ones in the Creeds. All the rest are not from Scriptures at all.*

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @@browncony3897 ou.... Creeds. There us nothing about Creeds in the Bible. You contradict yourself 🤣

    • @browncony3897
      @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +3

      @@felesamabilis *I merely pointed out your mm religion used Creeds. No contradiction. 🤣🤣🤣*
      you said
      There us nothing about Creeds in the Bible. You contradict yourself

  • @solafide9533
    @solafide9533 2 місяці тому +1

    *WHy would your religion with 95% clergies not from Scriptures and 95% doctrines not from Scriptures be the "true church"? Please answer. 🤣🤣🤣*
    *Shouldn't a true church have 100% clergies from Scriptures and 100% doctrines from Scriptures?*

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @solafide9533 you prove again you don't know anything about the Catholic Church. You throw some nonsensical numbers you just fake and have no clue about the topic you try to dispute 🤣

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 місяці тому +1

      @@felesamabilis *I had given you a chance to prove your roman p doctrines. You can't. My points remained.*

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @faithalone2171 you haven't any points yet 🤣 So yes you remained on the 0

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 місяці тому +1

      *You are supposed to prove your ROman p doctrines. Not me.*

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @@faithalone2171 you lie that it I'd not biblical. Prove it or repent

  • @starlightmusic8414
    @starlightmusic8414 2 місяці тому +1

    *RCs are so D - picable resorting to blocking/deleting comments again! Embarrassing ...!!!*

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      Dude you can't even operate UA-cam 🤣 Since when do you use it that you haven't noticed yet that some comments disappear. Why would I delete your comments. They are so funny.

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      All your comments are here. Call your IT friend if you don't see them. We do

    • @starlightmusic8414
      @starlightmusic8414 2 місяці тому +1

      @@felesamabilis *It only happened when i chatted with you at another channel and here. So what do you think?*

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @starlightmusic8414 funny. Because my comments dissappear when I answered to you 🤣🤣🤣 So you are the problem. You block anxiety delete 🤣

    • @solafide9533
      @solafide9533 2 місяці тому +1

      ​ @felesamabilis *Which of your post got deleted? WHere?*
      1
      2
      3

  • @browncony3897
    @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +1

    @felesamabilis *You are still dodging ... you cannot answer? .... 🤣🤣🤣 Why would your religion be the true church when 95% of clergies and 95% of RC doctrines did not come from Scriptures? Why would a religion with such low statistics be the "true church"? Explain.*

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      Prove your statistics or stop lying

    • @starlightmusic8414
      @starlightmusic8414 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@felesamabilis *Already proven. Only 5% of RC doctrines are biblical - those from the Creeds. There rest of the 95% were all not from Scriptures at all.*
      95% of RC doctrines were unheard of in 1st century and not from traditions of Jesus and Apostles or Scriptures or contradicts Scriptures! Jesus, Apostles and Nt Church of the Bible had not heard or practised any of these RC doctrines. Why is that so? Why would a "true church" deviate from the teachings of Jesus and Apostles that much? Why is that so? Explain coherently intelligently. 1. Purgatory 2. Confessing to priests 3. Office of pope or priests4. Pope being the vicar (representation of Christ, usurping the authority of God)5. Praying to Mary, saints6. Penance 7. Worshipping idols/images, placing idols images in church8. Church in the Bible is not building, but the body of believers9. Sacrament was never the real body and blood of Christ as RC church claimed (Real meaning real blood and body, bcos it didnt really turned "bloody" did it?)10. Salvation by (works (7sacraments) +faith) was never in the Bible. Real salvation is by grace through faith as seen in Bible. 11. Rosary, set repetitive prayers, hail Mary 10000 times12. Mass - putting Christ on the altar again and again13. Mary as queen of heaven 14. Mary as Ark of the new covenant. 15. Mary as the mother of heavenly Jesus thus Mary exist before Christ16. Immersion of infant for baptism17. Holy water18. Celibacy of priests (no office of priests in NT anyway, only priesthood of all believers)19. Kissing of statues20. Changing of 10 commandments. COmmandment of graven image removed by Catholic CHurch in Catholic Catechism. Splitting of another commandment into 2commandments. 21. Catholic church changed Bible verse Gen 3:15 (And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise His heel."). 'He' and 'His' referring to Christ. Catholics changed it to (Gen 3:15 And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; She shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise Her heel.") 'She' and 'Her' refers to Mary. 22. Catholic Church use Rev 12 to refer to Mary as 'queen of heaven', when Rev 12:6 clearly refers to Israel escaping the Great Tribulation. Mary cannot be alive to escape the Great Tribulation. 23. Catholic Church refers to Mary as 'Queen of heaven', but 'Queen of Mary' in the Bible is a demonic entity Astoreth or Ishtar, the female deity partner of Baal. 5 verses in Jeremiah as proof.24. Catholic church refers to Mary as the Mediatress, Co redemptress, helper of Christ, firstborn of all creation .. Mary cannot be the mediatress. Jesus is the one and only Mediator between God and man. Only Jesus redeems. Only the Holy Spirit is the Helper sent by Jesus. Only Jesus is the firstborn of all creation. 25. Roman Catholicism has “saints” one can pray to in order to gain a particular blessing. For example, Saint Gianna Beretta Molla is the patron saint of fertility. Francis of Assisi is the patron saint of animals. There are multiple patron saints of healing and comfort. Nowhere is even a hint of this taught in Scripture. Just as the Roman pantheon of gods had a god of love, a god of peace, a god of war, a god of strength, a god of wisdom, etc., so the Catholic Church has a saint who is “in charge” over each of these and many other categories. Many Roman cities had a god specific to the city, and the Catholic Church provided “patron saints” for cities as well.26. Mary is called the gate of heaven? Mary has keys to paradise? Here are roman pagan teachers saying their man made goddess is their savior. None of these quotes have been denounced, on the contrary they are cited. "Open to us, O Mary, the gate of Paradise, since you have its keys! " St. Ambrose"God has entrusted the keys and treasures of Heaven to Mary." St. Thomas Aquinas "No one can enter into Heaven except through Mary, as entering through a gate. " St. Bonaventure "Mary is called "The Gate of Heaven" because no one can enter Heaven but through her means." St. Alphonsus Maria Liguori Papal infallibility Immaculate Mary Assumption of Mary Perpetual Virgin Mary as Mother of God, co mediatrix, co redemptrix, new ark of covenant, Pope as vicar, Holy Water, papacy, peter as first pope, papal succession, apostolic succession, indulgences, 7 sacraments, rosary, veneration of saints and statues, celibacy of priesthood, canonization of saints, limbo, submit to roman pope to be saved, devote to roman Mary to be saved, be in, Roman religion to be saved, baptise in Roman baptism to be saved partake Roman sacraments to be saved, baptism of blood , calling Roman pope Lord God or equal to God

    • @starlightmusic8414
      @starlightmusic8414 2 місяці тому +1

      ​ @felesamabilis *Already proven. Only 5% of RC doctrines are biblical - those from the Creeds. There rest of the 95% were all not from Scriptures at all.*
      95% of RC doctrines were unheard of in 1st century and not from traditions of Jesus and Apostles or Scriptures or contradicts Scriptures! Jesus, Apostles and Nt Church of the Bible had not heard or practised any of these RC doctrines. Why is that so? Why would a "true church" deviate from the teachings of Jesus and Apostles that much? Why is that so? Explain coherently intelligently. 1. Purgatory 2. Confessing to priests 3. Office of pope or priests4. Pope being the vicar (representation of Christ, usurping the authority of God)5. Praying to Mary, saints6. Penance 7. Worshipping idols/images, placing idols images in church8. Church in the Bible is not building, but the body of believers9. Sacrament was never the real body and blood of Christ as RC church claimed (Real meaning real blood and body, bcos it didnt really turned "bloody" did it?)10. Salvation by (works (7sacraments) +faith) was never in the Bible. Real salvation is by grace through faith as seen in Bible. 11. Rosary, set repetitive prayers, hail Mary 10000 times12. Mass - putting Christ on the altar again and again13. Mary as queen of heaven 14. Mary as Ark of the new covenant. 15. Mary as the mother of heavenly Jesus thus Mary exist before Christ16. Immersion of infant for baptism17. Holy water18. Celibacy of priests (no office of priests in NT anyway, only priesthood of all believers)19. Kissing of statues20. Changing of 10 commandments. COmmandment of graven image removed by Catholic CHurch in Catholic Catechism. Splitting of another commandment into 2commandments. 21. Catholic church changed Bible verse Gen 3:15 (And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise His heel."). 'He' and 'His' referring to Christ. Catholics changed it to (Gen 3:15 And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; She shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise Her heel.") 'She' and 'Her' refers to Mary. 22. Catholic Church use Rev 12 to refer to Mary as 'queen of heaven', when Rev 12:6 clearly refers to Israel escaping the Great Tribulation. Mary cannot be alive to escape the Great Tribulation. 23. Catholic Church refers to Mary as 'Queen of heaven', but 'Queen of Mary' in the Bible is a demonic entity Astoreth or Ishtar, the female deity partner of Baal. 5 verses in Jeremiah as proof.24. Catholic church refers to Mary as the Mediatress, Co redemptress, helper of Christ, firstborn of all creation .. Mary cannot be the mediatress. Jesus is the one and only Mediator between God and man. Only Jesus redeems. Only the Holy Spirit is the Helper sent by Jesus. Only Jesus is the firstborn of all creation. 25. Roman Catholicism has “saints” one can pray to in order to gain a particular blessing. For example, Saint Gianna Beretta Molla is the patron saint of fertility. Francis of Assisi is the patron saint of animals. There are multiple patron saints of healing and comfort. Nowhere is even a hint of this taught in Scripture. Just as the Roman pantheon of gods had a god of love, a god of peace, a god of war, a god of strength, a god of wisdom, etc., so the Catholic Church has a saint who is “in charge” over each of these and many other categories. Many Roman cities had a god specific to the city, and the Catholic Church provided “patron saints” for cities as well.26. Mary is called the gate of heaven? Mary has keys to paradise? Here are roman pagan teachers saying their man made goddess is their savior. None of these quotes have been denounced, on the contrary they are cited. "Open to us, O Mary, the gate of Paradise, since you have its keys! " St. Ambrose"God has entrusted the keys and treasures of Heaven to Mary." St. Thomas Aquinas "No one can enter into Heaven except through Mary, as entering through a gate. " St. Bonaventure "Mary is called "The Gate of Heaven" because no one can enter Heaven but through her means." St. Alphonsus Maria Liguori Papal infallibility Immaculate Mary Assumption of Mary Perpetual Virgin Mary as Mother of God, co mediatrix, co redemptrix, new ark of covenant, Pope as vicar, Holy Water, papacy, peter as first pope, papal succession, apostolic succession, indulgences, 7 sacraments, rosary, veneration of saints and statues, celibacy of priesthood, canonization of saints, limbo, submit to roman pope to be saved, devote to roman Mary to be saved, be in, Roman religion to be saved, baptise in Roman baptism to be saved partake Roman sacraments to be saved, baptism of blood , calling Roman pope Lord God or equal to God

    • @starlightmusic8414
      @starlightmusic8414 2 місяці тому +1

      ​ @felesamabilis *Already proven. Only 5% of RC doctrines are biblical - those from the Creeds. There rest of the 95% were all not from Scriptures at all.*
      95% of RC doctrines were unheard of in 1st century and not from traditions of Jesus and Apostles or Scriptures or contradicts Scriptures! Jesus, Apostles and Nt Church of the Bible had not heard or practised any of these RC doctrines. Why is that so? Why would a "true church" deviate from the teachings of Jesus and Apostles that much? Why is that so? Explain coherently intelligently. 1. Purgatory 2. Confessing to priests 3. Office of pope or priests4. Pope being the vicar (representation of Christ, usurping the authority of God)5. Praying to Mary, saints6. Penance 7. Worshipping idols/images, placing idols images in church8. Church in the Bible is not building, but the body of believers9. Sacrament was never the real body and blood of Christ as RC church claimed (Real meaning real blood and body, bcos it didnt really turned "bloody" did it?)10. Salvation by (works (7sacraments) +faith) was never in the Bible. Real salvation is by grace through faith as seen in Bible. 11. Rosary, set repetitive prayers, hail Mary 10000 times12. Mass - putting Christ on the altar again and again13. Mary as queen of heaven 14. Mary as Ark of the new covenant. 15. Mary as the mother of heavenly Jesus thus Mary exist before Christ16. Immersion of infant for baptism17. Holy water18. Celibacy of priests (no office of priests in NT anyway, only priesthood of all believers)19. Kissing of statues20. Changing of 10 commandments. COmmandment of graven image removed by Catholic CHurch in Catholic Catechism. Splitting of another commandment into 2commandments. 21. Catholic church changed Bible verse Gen 3:15 (And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; He shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise His heel."). 'He' and 'His' referring to Christ. Catholics changed it to (Gen 3:15 And I will put enmity Between you and the woman, And between your seed and her Seed; She shall bruise your head, And you shall bruise Her heel.") 'She' and 'Her' refers to Mary. 22. Catholic Church use Rev 12 to refer to Mary as 'queen of heaven', when Rev 12:6 clearly refers to Israel escaping the Great Tribulation. Mary cannot be alive to escape the Great Tribulation. 23. Catholic Church refers to Mary as 'Queen of heaven', but 'Queen of Mary' in the Bible is a demonic entity Astoreth or Ishtar, the female deity partner of Baal. 5 verses in Jeremiah as proof.24. Catholic church refers to Mary as the Mediatress, Co redemptress, helper of Christ, firstborn of all creation .. Mary cannot be the mediatress. Jesus is the one and only Mediator between God and man. Only Jesus redeems. Only the Holy Spirit is the Helper sent by Jesus. Only Jesus is the firstborn of all creation. 25. Roman Catholicism has “saints” one can pray to in order to gain a particular blessing. For example, Saint Gianna Beretta Molla is the patron saint of fertility. Francis of Assisi is the patron saint of animals. There are multiple patron saints of healing and comfort. Nowhere is even a hint of this taught in Scripture. Just as the Roman pantheon of gods had a god of love, a god of peace, a god of war, a god of strength, a god of wisdom, etc., so the Catholic Church has a saint who is “in charge” over each of these and many other categories. Many Roman cities had a god specific to the city, and the Catholic Church provided “patron saints” for cities as well.26. Mary is called the gate of heaven? Mary has keys to paradise? Here are roman pagan teachers saying their man made goddess is their savior. None of these quotes have been denounced, on the contrary they are cited. "Open to us, O Mary, the gate of Paradise, since you have its keys! " St. Ambrose"God has entrusted the keys and treasures of Heaven to Mary." St. Thomas Aquinas "No one can enter into Heaven except through Mary, as entering through a gate. " St. Bonaventure "Mary is called "The Gate of Heaven" because no one can enter Heaven but through her means." St. Alphonsus Maria Liguori Papal infallibility Immaculate Mary Assumption of Mary Perpetual Virgin Mary as Mother of God, co mediatrix, co redemptrix, new ark of covenant, Pope as vicar, Holy Water, papacy, peter as first pope, papal succession, apostolic succession, indulgences, 7 sacraments, rosary, veneration of saints and statues, celibacy of priesthood, canonization of saints, limbo, submit to roman pope to be saved, devote to roman Mary to be saved, be in, Roman religion to be saved, baptise in Roman baptism to be saved partake Roman sacraments to be saved, baptism of blood , calling Roman pope Lord God or equal to God

    • @starlightmusic8414
      @starlightmusic8414 2 місяці тому +1

      *THe proof kept getting deleted. Wonder why? I post it on main screen.*

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 місяці тому +1

    *Pope Boniface 8th: Salvation if You Submit to Pope*
    1201-1500
    Pope Boniface VIII published a bull on this day, November 18, 1302, titled Unam sanctam. It still generates deep controversy. The bull denies salvation to any human being who does not submit to the Roman Catholic Church and its head, the pope.
    *"...There is one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, outside of which there is neither salvation nor remission of sins..."*
    *"...Indeed we declare, say, pronounce, and define that it is altogether necessary to salvation for every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff."*
    A bull is a solemn papal letter. The form was given this name because it was sealed with a bulla, a round lead seal. This particular bull was written as the latest round in an ongoing war of words between the pope and King Philip IV "the Fair" of France.

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  Місяць тому

      Move to the next video. It's getting boring

  • @browncony3897
    @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +1

    @felesamabilis *You failed to prove your self claims again... Where in the gospels ever said "brothers of Jesus had other mothers"? If you can find that i will give you a lollipop.* 🤣🤣🤣

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      I quoted it. The mother of Jacob and Joses was Mary "SISTER OF Jesus' mother" Gospel according to John

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      Where can I get the lollipop?

    • @browncony3897
      @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +1

      @@felesamabilis *Yes but nowhere says "they were mothers of the "brothers of Jesus". So prove the self claims of Rome.* 🤣🤣🤣
      you said
      I quoted it. The mother of Jacob and Joses was Mary "SISTER OF Jesus' mother" Gospel according to John

    • @browncony3897
      @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +1

      @@felesamabilis *Roman p doctrines can never be proven. There goes your lollipop. 🤣🤣🤣*

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @@browncony3897 Joses and Jacob are those "brothers of Jesus". You quoted it yourself 🤣🤣🤣

  • @solafide9533
    @solafide9533 2 місяці тому +1

    *THis dodo kept blocking/deleting comments/nicks. THis is my 3rd nick here.*

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @@solafide9533 and everybody sees all your comments and all nicks. Call your IT friend if you can't operate YT

    • @solafide9533
      @solafide9533 2 місяці тому +1

      @@felesamabilis *Yes that's after i replied to my own nick. The rest were deleted. That's why i changed nick. Since comments kept getting deleted.*

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @solafide9533 just posted a short proving all your comments from all your nicks are there. Call your IT friend if you can't see them and stop lying

    • @solafide9533
      @solafide9533 2 місяці тому +2

      @@felesamabilis *How do you know all my posts are here? Lol. Are you me?*

  • @SoulReadmy
    @SoulReadmy 2 місяці тому

    Gut argumentiert.

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      Danke

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      Das ist natürlich rein biblische Argumentation somit nur die Hälfte der Offenbarung

    • @SoulReadmy
      @SoulReadmy 2 місяці тому

      ​​@@felesamabilis
      Was das Jungfrau Problem angeht ist drin eine Botschaft versteckt die sich in heutiger Zeit noch offenbaren wird. Wenn sich Judäa bekehren wird wie aus Buch Joel. Das ist aber sehr gut versteckt in der Schrift
      Jesaja 7 14.
      alma (ein junges Mädchen) betula (eine Jungfrau)

  • @faithalone2171
    @faithalone2171 2 місяці тому +1

    *4th nick here. This dodo is still deleting/blocking my nicks/comments. Embarrassing ..* 🤣🤣🤣

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @@faithalone2171 embarrassing is your IT-ignirance. I posted a short which shows all your comments and nicks. You are a liar

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@felesamabilis *You did not capture all my comments in your shots to know they were not deleted. Some are inside the threads. I think you merely took a shot of the on-screen comments. Not inside the threads.*

    • @faithalone2171
      @faithalone2171 2 місяці тому +1

      @@felesamabilis *I know they were deleted since this is my 4th nick. THe rest of the latest comments from other nicks all disappeared. The older comments remained of course.*

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @faithalone2171 I don't care what you think. You lie

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      @faithalone2171 you lie about being blocked. Revoke and repent

  • @browncony3897
    @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +1

    @felesamabilis *I am reposting here so everyone could see your errors. You are the one who lacks logic. Why would a Greek word appear in OT? OT was written in Hebrews. Not Greek. Learn some logic before debating. It’s embarrassing. 🤣🤣🤣*
    *It was added in when RCs used a translation called LXX. Added stuff does not prove doctrines. Original Hebrew OT did not have the word Adelphos.*

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      It was added? 😂😂😂 Christians added something to Septuaginta. Right. In 2 century before Christ 😂

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      Well, if you have to like your comments by yourself you prove how wrong your arguments are

    • @browncony3897
      @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +1

      @@felesamabilis *LXX was a Greek translation from Hebrews OT. Hebrew OT did not contain Apo 7 books. Why would LXX have Apo 7 books? Clearly your mm religion added 7 books.*
      you said
      It was added? 😂😂😂 Christians added something to Septuaginta. Right. In 2 century before Christ 😂

    • @browncony3897
      @browncony3897 2 місяці тому +1

      @@felesamabilis *My point remained: Why would a Greek word "adelphos" appear in OT when OT was written in Hebrews. Not Greek? Your reply lacks logic. 🤣🤣🤣*
      .

    • @felesamabilis
      @felesamabilis  2 місяці тому

      ​@@browncony3897you know there is a Hebrew word for brother and cousin too. It was translated to Greek using adolphos for both brothers and cousins exactly like it was in Hebrew. If you would first read and then type you would have time to think before you wrote such nonsense