@@randallwong7196 let's nerf some Russian tanks below real life first and make Chinese transmissions break etc. Let's buff the tiger 1 then, above real life.
Imagine telling Accuracy is too high when the Sturm Tiger literally needs to elevated the main gun to engage at range. Also, this is Warthunder, Gun accuracy is depends on the player to aim.
@Joe bruh, you're telling me a battleship would engage a tank at 2km range?? Battleship optimal range is 10-20km, a freaking 16inch maximum range is 24km.
This was cool to watch. Fun matchup. Sturm's rate of fire however was 1 round every 10 min. HE not AP. Provided the ships guns could deppress low enough i'm thinking there woyld be a lot scrap metal on the dock after the first exchange of fire...still and all loved watching this. Good one.
At that angle of attack on the warship the magazines would have never been hit. Especially by an HE Mortor round. Also, with only 83mm of penetration those rocket Propelled mortor rounds are only doing surface damage except for the pilothouse of most of the ships. Even with plunging fire the rounds are not direction blasts so the rounds would still explode and cause blast damage but not set fires right away. The concussion blast would actually put out fires and move light flammable objects away before they got hot enough to ignite. Shipboard firefighting 101 right there.
@Joe This is half true. The mortar was intended for coastal defense, firing depth charges against submerged submarines, which would not entail the ability to penertate a ship's deck. The rocket projectile was developed explicitly for the Sturmtiger. Even still, I don't think it would be able to reach the magazine of anything larger than a destroyer, ships are just too dense.
The vehicle wasn't intended for use in coastal defense (doubt it could have been used effectively against any type of moving target really). It was intended to be a bunker-buster with the ammunition being capable of penetrating almost 3 meters of reinforced concrete, which is way tougher than the armour of anything other than a battleship.
The main guns on the bigger ships have a much longer range then the range of the Sturmtigers' guns. The ships could have stayed out of range and blow the heck out of the dock and the Sturmtigers without having to worry about being hit.
@@stareye3176 Salvo from 9x305mm guns is 9x470kg shot at 900m/s. A hit of such a single projectile leaves crater wider than 10 meters. Those 4 tanks would've just been blown into pieces even by indirect hits. Even medium artillery like 152mm light cruiser guns or 100-152mm Kronshtadt secondaries would be perfectly enough to destroy a tank from mere 200-300 meters at any angle.
Hell I'm sorry, there's no way to build a tank with enough armor to withstand even a light cruiser's 6 inch gun with the velocity those AP shells would have at what's basically in naval terms...point blank range. And to miss shots that freaking close to your target is a sin. And agreed those rocket propelled mortars wouldn't stand a chance against typical armor scheme of every ship here except the torpedo boat and the frigate.The sure don't have the velocity or the ballistics of flight needed that shells have from a rifled gun.
I really enjoyed watching this epic battle! The Sturms were fascinating to observe and their deadly effects on the warships. A lot of fun and wow factor!
If the warship keep their distance, it will be a one-sided battle. Since the subject of this video is Sturmtiger, we are fighting at this close range to make it a fair fight.
The German tank Divisions found out what it was really like to be on the receiving end of 16" (403mm) Battleship guns, 15 Miles (24km) away, during the fight for Northern France in 1944 - HE shells. They'd had a taste of it when they fired on RN destroyer in Fall of France in 1940, and they were on y 4" (100mm) guns - but with AP shells.
@Joe Actually documented by the Germans, that it was members "Brandenburg Special Services Unit", that shot at their own border guards to provide the excuse to invade. They tried the same "trick" again when they invaded The Netherlands and Belgium, 7-8 months later.
The 6" AP rounds from the light cruiser should have had no trouble punching through the Sturmtiger's armor at that range. The 15" HE shells from the Kronstadt's main guns would have blown the Sturmtigers to pieces, and the 15" AP rounds would be like, "Did I hit something?"
You could really sense the enormous firepower a BB tier ship had, imagine actually being the little guy in a battlefield facing such enemies at a close distance...damn.
The trajectory is the real game changer in here, by plunging it could bypass the thin armoured deck of the ships (some ships) and Stürm has a 38cm rocket.
Naval guns could score plunging fire hits at distance. Naval architects designed defenses for that like turtleback armor. Some warships definitely had armored decks, British ships dome to mind.
@MartyInLa The turtleback armor scheme was designed for close ranges, which is why the Bismarck proved difficult (but not impossible) to sink. It's a WWI armor scheme.
@@tsuaririndoku from what I've read, Hood was considered to be Battlecruiser, so I would assume that since the Bismarck is a full time Battleship it sports a thicker and better armour schemes whereas Hood designed to be 'fast' battleship and had a less thicker armour.
Yeah, no. The ships were woefully inaccurate. The Sturmtiger reloads ahistorically quick. 127mm and 152mm shells would do a lot of bad things to these vehicles. Battleship shells were flipping Tiger tanks in Normandy like a young child throwing a tantrum. I can see the Sturmtiger rounds being a threat to Cruisers and smaller ships, but not Battleships. Battleship critical spaces are too well protected to these high explosive shells. They were meant to withstand other Battleships slinging large armor piercing shells at them. Battleship South Dakota at Guadalcanal was taking a pounding from a handful of Japanese Destroyers, Cruisers, and one 356mm armed Battleship, Kirishima. Kirishima was firing 380mm high explosive rounds at South Dakota because Kirishima was on a mission to shell the Henderson Field, and American Battleships showing up was not in the forecast. South Dakota took a lot of hits from 127mm, 203mm, 356mm shells but was never in any danger of sinking. So the Battleship being sunk by a handful of high explosive rockets? That's bull. But this is an arcade game, I guess. If we want to be real, these ships would be shelling the Sturmtigers from afar.
@Joe The batteries of AA guns and possibly secondary guns would be more than a match for a handful of armored vehicles. Yes, at that range the main guns would useless on most battleships but in terms of raw power difference let me put it this way, I believe it was Wisconsin who was engaged by 155mm ground based artillery in Korea and responded with a full broadside from her 16in battery, obliterated the artillery and everyone else in the area while receiving no discernable damage and only a few injured crew members. Battleships are just on a whole other level of firepower. Even their secondaries are equivalent to most light cruisers.
I'm not trying to pick away at the simulation but I'm guessing as long as the big deck guns could get low enough for a firing solution, those tanks wouldn't stand a chance.
Read an account of battles between Russian tanks and armored trains in Russia; when the bigger guns on the armored train hit a Russian tank there would be no more than dime-sized pieces left.
Remember that time the Hier used a battery of Sturmtigers to hold off the allied fleet at d-day? This makes me think warships are under powered as hell in warthunder
They are, one torpedo can sink a dreadnought in warthunder. Irl it's hard as hell to actually sink a ship. Hell the U.S.S. Nevada was a ww1 dreadnought battleship and it fought 2 wars then took 2 nuclear bombs and survived both explosions. They had to set a massive charge in her citadel to sink her.
This is so unrealistic. The torpedo boat I could understand, but the rest had guns designed to penetrate naval armor, which was thicker than any tank armor. The Sturmtigers would have been reduced to scrap metal from the frigate and up.
The frigate would have opened up on the sturmtiger well outside of the sturmtigers range and anti aircraft weapons would have gone through the sturm tiger like shit through a goose.
@@zohaibtariq7351 you are daft the 5" 38 caliber were dual purpose aa also the 40mm Bofors would have blown right through the be sturm tiger the sturm tigers mortor was a close range weapon I'll suited to firing on moving targets.
The secondary armament of most of these ships would likely put out enough fire to go down the barrel of the Sturmtiger and destroy the rocket projectile in the tube before it could be fired. No armor there if a round hits it.
It was a very entertaining video and that, in my opinion, justifies any upload. Good job on putting this together. I doubt, however, the outcome would have been the same in real life. lol
Ya…simply hitting the small gunboat would be next to impossible with such slow moving projectiles. Also Each ship is coming from exactly the same direction and their guns are VERY CLEARLY NERFED.
The tanks seem to be in god mode, I've seen several hits that would've taken out a modern tank let alone those relics. Not till towards the end of the video when one finally dies to a shell that would've taken out a good shized chunk of city.
The interesting part is after finally getting the strum mouser I actually wanted to test this theory I would like to see more tests so that is to know the full extent with every battleship
0:26
動画「今回は4両のシュトゥルムティーガーを用意した」
紹介直後に３両になって草
途中海に落ちてくシュトゥルムかわいい
可愛さはあっても威力は怖いんだよねw
Well, he said he need 4 Sturmtiger so that one Sturmtiger voluntarily threw itself into the sea.
腹筋崩壊
Apparently the Germans never needed a navy, nor an aircraft carrier like the Graf Zeppelin. Merely Sturmtiger Carriers.
見てて可愛そうって思ったw
6:32 身を挺して友軍を守る図すこすこ
シュトゥルムティーガーの38cmロケット臼砲は海軍艦艇の対潜水艦用に作ったやつらしいのでむしろ本職なんやろな……
5:16辺りの被弾しても何事も無かったかのように煙から出てくるクロンシュタットがイケメンすぎる
5:05
0:40魚雷艇に対して無慈悲過ぎて笑っちゃった
4両用意したって言った瞬間3両になっててわろた
I get a sense that the Sturmtiger's firing accuracy is rated too high, and the ships' is too low.
Very few Allied weapons ( or none ) could probably have a chance against a Maus so nerfing the Maus would be necessary to make the game interesting.
@@randallwong7196 let's nerf some Russian tanks below real life first and make Chinese transmissions break etc. Let's buff the tiger 1 then, above real life.
Imagine telling Accuracy is too high when the Sturm Tiger literally needs to elevated the main gun to engage at range. Also, this is Warthunder, Gun accuracy is depends on the player to aim.
@user-uk1qz8mb7xcry wehraboo
@Joe bruh, you're telling me a battleship would engage a tank at 2km range?? Battleship optimal range is 10-20km, a freaking 16inch maximum range is 24km.
海落ちっていく所可愛い
助けてもらえたのか気になる
残念ながら...（ﾌﾞｸﾌﾞｸﾌﾞｸ
6:26
ここは被弾した左端を真ん中が守りに行ってるのかな？ なんだかかわいらしいもんだ。
シュトゥルムティガーがぴょこぴょこ動いてるのがかわいい（そこじゃない。
同じこと思いました
This was cool to watch. Fun matchup. Sturm's rate of fire however was 1 round every 10 min. HE not AP. Provided the ships guns could deppress low enough i'm thinking there woyld be a lot scrap metal on the dock after the first exchange of fire...still and all loved watching this. Good one.
シュトゥルムティーガー４兄弟
可愛かったです✨
At that angle of attack on the warship the magazines would have never been hit. Especially by an HE Mortor round. Also, with only 83mm of penetration those rocket Propelled mortor rounds are only doing surface damage except for the pilothouse of most of the ships. Even with plunging fire the rounds are not direction blasts so the rounds would still explode and cause blast damage but not set fires right away. The concussion blast would actually put out fires and move light flammable objects away before they got hot enough to ignite. Shipboard firefighting 101 right there.
Shh key board warrior
@Joe As I never said anything about the Ship's firing at that range. This comment is pointless and shows your lack of reading my comment.
bro forgot this was a video game
@Joe This is half true. The mortar was intended for coastal defense, firing depth charges against submerged submarines, which would not entail the ability to penertate a ship's deck. The rocket projectile was developed explicitly for the Sturmtiger. Even still, I don't think it would be able to reach the magazine of anything larger than a destroyer, ships are just too dense.
The vehicle wasn't intended for use in coastal defense (doubt it could have been used effectively against any type of moving target really). It was intended to be a bunker-buster with the ammunition being capable of penetrating almost 3 meters of reinforced concrete, which is way tougher than the armour of anything other than a battleship.
もともとシュツルムティーガーのロケット自体が対艦用だった希ガス・・・
自分の記憶が正しければ、対潜水艦の爆雷投射器だったはず
正しいです。
海軍発注の38cm臼砲を陸軍が横取りした→壊れた戦車にくっ付ける案を提出→ヒトラーが興味を示し、直ぐ始める様指示→とりあえず試作機を…となり、製作。同時に量産開始。
故障したティーガーIを修理して装甲板を付けた自走砲です。
元々、戦車の射程外から攻撃する自走砲なのに、重装甲で走らない代物。
装弾数13＋1発。映像ではバンバン撃っているが、実際には1発撃ったら、車両員全員（5名）で次弾を装填する必要があります（要ヘルプ員&要クレーン）
返信ありがとうございます！つまるところ対艦ロケットってことでいいですよね？
@@青魚-t3p さん
臼砲は、迫撃砲の口径がデカいモノを指します。
迫撃砲と臼砲の境目は、厳密に◯cm以上という基準はありません。
対艦ロケット砲か？と言われると『？』が回答です。
38cm臼砲とロケット弾の発注は海軍なのは記録から間違い有りません。
ただ、この時期 制空権も制海権も失っていますし、ドイツ海軍自体まともな艦船が残っていません。
又、艦船に臼砲＋ロケット砲を積んでも余り意味が有りません（射程が海軍としては短い為）
結果、対艦目的か？と言われると疑問符が付くと思います。
臼砲自体、トーチカ等 固定された堅固なモノを破壊する（攻撃する）大砲だからです。
@@雪の降る夜 えーっと、38cmロケット臼砲ってことですか？
とても面白い組み合わせだと思います。大和が沖縄までたどり着けていれば と 考えずにはいられません。
最初シュトゥルムが海に落ちて行くところで吹いたww
シュトゥルムティーガー…強すぎませんか…
なお砲塔内
戦車対艦船シリーズの新たな１ページ。
エンディングの乗り切った感で映画を観てた様でした。
最後の飛び込みは『次はせんすいかんだ！(本来仕様)』かな？ ｗｗ
0:27、1台落っこちたのはなんだ?w
潜水艦になりたかったんだよきっと(ﾃｹﾄｰ)
The main guns on the bigger ships have a much longer range then the range of the Sturmtigers' guns. The ships could have stayed out of range and blow the heck out of the dock and the Sturmtigers without having to worry about being hit.
Moreover, a boat shot was so powerful that the air displacement from the shells could blow the entire structure of a boat with just one missed shot."
@@stareye3176 Salvo from 9x305mm guns is 9x470kg shot at 900m/s. A hit of such a single projectile leaves crater wider than 10 meters. Those 4 tanks would've just been blown into pieces even by indirect hits. Even medium artillery like 152mm light cruiser guns or 100-152mm Kronshtadt secondaries would be perfectly enough to destroy a tank from mere 200-300 meters at any angle.
Hell I'm sorry, there's no way to build a tank with enough armor to withstand even a light cruiser's 6 inch gun with the velocity those AP shells would have at what's basically in naval terms...point blank range. And to miss shots that freaking close to your target is a sin. And agreed those rocket propelled mortars wouldn't stand a chance against typical armor scheme of every ship here except the torpedo boat and the frigate.The sure don't have the velocity or the ballistics of flight needed that shells have from a rifled gun.
『戦車４両を用意…』って言ってる側から海落ちは草
I really enjoyed watching this epic battle! The Sturms were fascinating to observe and their deadly effects on the warships. A lot of fun and wow factor!
昔読んだ小説に
駆逐艦とパンターの撃ち合いなんてシーンがあった気がする
佐藤大輔さんのですね
@@take-c61 おかげではっきりと思い出しました。佐藤氏の遺作レッドサン・ブラッククロスのソコトラ島攻防戦でした。
I would think a heavy cruiser or battleship could stand off some distance and shell the Strumtigers with no threat to itself.
If the warship keep their distance, it will be a one-sided battle. Since the subject of this video is Sturmtiger, we are fighting at this close range to make it a fair fight.
and... these ships are built for receiving 14-16" shells. They can stand this a while and strike back...
@@WT_Wolf
If the warship keeps distance, it won't even see the tanks.
@@stefank3461 Hence why the ground crews need to spot the tank, like calling for artillery in WT
@@Edo_Ginting
Yes, and then the tank crew is calling for Stukas. Perhaps Hans Ulrich Rudel is around...
The German tank Divisions found out what it was really like to be on the receiving end of 16" (403mm) Battleship guns, 15 Miles (24km) away, during the fight for Northern France in 1944 - HE shells.
They'd had a taste of it when they fired on RN destroyer in Fall of France in 1940, and they were on y 4" (100mm) guns - but with AP shells.
@Joe The opening shots of WW2 were from their Pre-dreadnought Shlweistig-Holstein, with its 11” guns ….
@Joe September 1939
@Joe Apologist for Hitler?
@Joe Actually documented by the Germans, that it was members "Brandenburg Special Services Unit", that shot at their own border guards to provide the excuse to invade. They tried the same "trick" again when they invaded The Netherlands and Belgium, 7-8 months later.
@Joe Next you will be saying that there were no concentration camps, or death camps .....
The 6" AP rounds from the light cruiser should have had no trouble punching through the Sturmtiger's armor at that range. The 15" HE shells from the Kronstadt's main guns would have blown the Sturmtigers to pieces, and the 15" AP rounds would be like, "Did I hit something?"
ティーガーの挙動がタチコマみたいで可愛かったです、無限リポップで草
I also liked it when one drove off the dock and proceeded with underwater operations? 😂😂😂
You could really sense the enormous firepower a BB tier ship had, imagine actually being the little guy in a battlefield facing such enemies at a close distance...damn.
The Battle Off Samar
@@shawnstanford264 The absolute legend of Taffy 3
0:27
38cm積んでるならワイも戦艦やｒ((ｵﾎﾞﾎﾞﾎﾞﾎﾞﾎﾞﾎﾞﾎﾞﾎﾞ
見方シュトゥルムティーガー「前に出すぎるなぁ！！」
The falling Sturmtiger into the ocean was cute
ちょこちょこ動くシュトゥルムティーガー可愛いw
The trajectory is the real game changer in here, by plunging it could bypass the thin armoured deck of the ships (some ships) and Stürm has a 38cm rocket.
Naval guns could score plunging fire hits at distance. Naval architects designed defenses for that like turtleback armor. Some warships definitely had armored decks, British ships dome to mind.
@@MartyInLa cant say the same thing to Hood sadly
@MartyInLa The turtleback armor scheme was designed for close ranges, which is why the Bismarck proved difficult (but not impossible) to sink. It's a WWI armor scheme.
@@tsuaririndoku from what I've read, Hood was considered to be Battlecruiser, so I would assume that since the Bismarck is a full time Battleship it sports a thicker and better armour schemes whereas Hood designed to be 'fast' battleship and had a less thicker armour.
@@jetuito nice story, too bad The Bismarck didnt use turtleback armor scheme🤨
Yeah, no.
The ships were woefully inaccurate.
The Sturmtiger reloads ahistorically quick.
127mm and 152mm shells would do a lot of bad things to these vehicles. Battleship shells were flipping Tiger tanks in Normandy like a young child throwing a tantrum.
I can see the Sturmtiger rounds being a threat to Cruisers and smaller ships, but not Battleships. Battleship critical spaces are too well protected to these high explosive shells. They were meant to withstand other Battleships slinging large armor piercing shells at them. Battleship South Dakota at Guadalcanal was taking a pounding from a handful of Japanese Destroyers, Cruisers, and one 356mm armed Battleship, Kirishima. Kirishima was firing 380mm high explosive rounds at South Dakota because Kirishima was on a mission to shell the Henderson Field, and American Battleships showing up was not in the forecast. South Dakota took a lot of hits from 127mm, 203mm, 356mm shells but was never in any danger of sinking.
So the Battleship being sunk by a handful of high explosive rockets? That's bull. But this is an arcade game, I guess.
If we want to be real, these ships would be shelling the Sturmtigers from afar.
@Joe The batteries of AA guns and possibly secondary guns would be more than a match for a handful of armored vehicles. Yes, at that range the main guns would useless on most battleships but in terms of raw power difference let me put it this way, I believe it was Wisconsin who was engaged by 155mm ground based artillery in Korea and responded with a full broadside from her 16in battery, obliterated the artillery and everyone else in the area while receiving no discernable damage and only a few injured crew members.
Battleships are just on a whole other level of firepower. Even their secondaries are equivalent to most light cruisers.
@Joe cruiser and battleship not same thing 🤣🤣
@@nobledemon9239 Battle cruiser and Battleship not same thing too
It's a battle cruiser not a battleship
Who told you that stupid s#it? They lied to you. Battleships were not "flipping tigertanks" in normandy kid.
LOL, A nick from a 5" armor piercing shell and up, would overmatch the sturm armor and open it like a balloon.
0:25からの一台落ちるところが・・なんとも可愛い感じがしました。
火力はものすごいし正面装甲もバッチリある。元がティーガーだからすごく遅いわけでもない。これは最強の戦車だ！！
足回りの故障と装填時間が解決できたらヤバい戦車として後世でもつよつよ戦車として有名になってたんだろうなぁ・・・
近距離ならいいでしょうが、遠距離ならまず弾が当たらないので対戦車戦は不向きです。火力がすごいと言っても重装甲の艦相手には効かず、本来の用途こそ軽装甲の艦向け。正面装甲は150mmで重戦車の砲弾すら耐えられないし、艦砲は問答無用で貫通して吹き飛ばされる。そもそも特別な用途で急造されたものなので最強とかそういうジャンルを競う戦車ではない。仮に戦車戦をやったとしても、あの短砲身では臼砲と同じ撃ち方になるから、距離を取られて弾が当てられなくなればT-34にすら勝てない
海に落っこちそうな個体がかわいい
Destroyer sits out of range of Sturmtigers and shreds them with withering fire from 6" naval guns.
Наконец-то!
Мы этого ждали и мы этого дождались!
I'm not trying to pick away at the simulation but I'm guessing as long as the big deck guns could get low enough for a firing solution, those tanks wouldn't stand a chance.
Read an account of battles between Russian tanks and armored trains in Russia; when the bigger guns on the armored train hit a Russian tank there would be no more than dime-sized pieces left.
WW2 Canadian Shermans sank 3 German corvettes in Dutch waters. They recovered one of the bells and its in their Officers mess today.
Смотрел с большим интересом, спасибо за контент!
Спасибо за просмотр!
見ごたえある良い考察でした。
小動物っぽい挙動がかわいい。
でもなんで落ちるのよｗ
ご視聴ありがとうございます！
皆並ばせようとしたら勢い余って彼は落ちてしまいました...
Remember that time the Hier used a battery of Sturmtigers to hold off the allied fleet at d-day?
This makes me think warships are under powered as hell in warthunder
It's a 380mm rocket, idk what you're expecting
They are, one torpedo can sink a dreadnought in warthunder. Irl it's hard as hell to actually sink a ship. Hell the U.S.S. Nevada was a ww1 dreadnought battleship and it fought 2 wars then took 2 nuclear bombs and survived both explosions. They had to set a massive charge in her citadel to sink her.
No resemblance of reality, whatsoever.
実際には、駆逐艦がシュトルムティーガーの有効射程まで接近してくれることはない
面白かったです。
揺れる艦上からの精密射撃など、そうそう命中するものではない、ってとこが強みでしょうか。
そう考えれば実戦では射撃管制塔や艦橋を狙うのも有効なんでしょうけど、
それを言ったらこんな距離で艦船と撃ち合うなんてまぁ無いでしょうしw
This is so unrealistic. The torpedo boat I could understand, but the rest had guns designed to penetrate naval armor, which was thicker than any tank armor. The Sturmtigers would have been reduced to scrap metal from the frigate and up.
わちゃわちゃしてて可愛い笑
I just subscribed to your channel man, love the videos, great job 👍👍 thank you
thank you! Comments like that really encourage me to create videos!
祖父は高射砲兵だったが若い頃に聞いた野戦勤務の話。現実はーーーーーー。人間の堕地獄だよ‼️
今回は４両用意した。・・で、１両おっこちて３両になるの草ｗｗ
The frigate would have opened up on the sturmtiger well outside of the sturmtigers range and anti aircraft weapons would have gone through the sturm tiger like shit through a goose.
You know the highest calibre of AA guns is 40mm right?
@@zohaibtariq7351 you are daft the 5" 38 caliber were dual purpose aa also the 40mm Bofors would have blown right through the be sturm tiger the sturm tigers mortor was a close range weapon I'll suited to firing on moving targets.
Amazing battles against battleships..!! I really enjoyed it..!
Thank you for your nice comment! There was kai who made it. I will continue to post interesting content in the future.
It’s fictional crap
@@Gromit801😅🤣🤣
最後に海に沈んでいく突撃虎が、戦国自衛隊の61式もどきを思い出す。
用意した途端海に落っこちる戦車。
なんだこの可愛い乗り物は…
The secondary armament of most of these ships would likely put out enough fire to go down the barrel of the Sturmtiger and destroy the rocket projectile in the tube before it could be fired. No armor there if a round hits it.
こういったシミュレートが（厳密なものではないにしても）手軽にできるのは妄想で全てを片付けていた時代では考えられませんね。 それなりの説得力というものが生まれます。
そして虎ちゃん達がかわいい＾ 私は英語とドイツ語ごちゃ読みのストームティーガーという呼び方が好きです＾
魚雷艇のスピードに照準合うのか?
I love these videos. Always fun. Even though the frigate would've taken all 4 of those tanks with minimal fuss If this had any sense of realism.
Frigrate has only HE ammo in game bro and cannon is only 76mm(noth sure about cannon)
It was a very entertaining video and that, in my opinion, justifies any upload. Good job on putting this together. I doubt, however, the outcome would have been the same in real life. lol
BFではお世話になりましたm(_ _)m
こういうロマン武器大好き
戦車で軍艦撃つとか絶対有り得ない構図
Ya…simply hitting the small gunboat would be next to impossible with such slow moving projectiles. Also Each ship is coming from exactly the same direction and their guns are VERY CLEARLY NERFED.
lol no commentary just captions and that was freaking entertaining man!
Sturmtigers vs sad Russian scows. On Sicily, a single Brooklyn-class CL overwhelmed a platoon of Tiger 1sBrooklyn
The fact that the sturmtiger is Built on a tiger chassis makes the best
Glory and Honnor to the Sturmtiger, my second love just after the Maus.
規格外の巨砲とはいえ戦車で駆逐艦をあっさり沈めるのはかなりのジャイアントキリング
感動した！フューラーも喜んでおられる！
Sturmtigers so badass, they tried to be Uboats at the end of the battle....
Fun video ... the Sturmtigers look like minions. 😆
大和型が出てきた時の絶望感よ
やはりロケット砲弾·····!! ロケット砲弾は全てを解決する!!
The tanks seem to be in god mode, I've seen several hits that would've taken out a modern tank let alone those relics. Not till towards the end of the video when one finally dies to a shell that would've taken out a good shized chunk of city.
"I prepared 4 Sturmtigers just in case-"
**Sturmtiger wanders into the water**
"...just in case that happens."
"FISHIE! I SEE A FISHIE!"
(now I'm imagining the Sturmtigers talking like the Tachikomas from Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex...)
後半に行くごとに
「うちのタチコマに・・・もとい、
うちの子たちになにすんねん！」と
おかしなストームタイガー愛にめざめる俺。
こんな戦車に条件のいい戦いはないわ すぐ吹き飛ばされるレベル
0:25 Four little kittens watching the fifth kitten get it's bath.
Beautifully shot.
The rate of fire difference, and the ability to hit a moving target for the Sturm tigers is very low.
A destroyer with 5" rapid guns would smoke them.
the 4 sturmtigers combined equal just ONE of the two quad turrets on a King George V class battleship, and even then, they can only fire HE.
ガングートはアップされてないのかな？
キーロフはアップされないのかな？
軽巡クラスの次がいきなり戦艦でトン数が開きすぎで重巡や巡戦クラスもやって欲しい。
1.4万tらしいので条約型重巡(1万t)より全然大きそうですけどね。
大戦で出た重巡以上の性能だよ。
旧日本海軍の軽巡４０００トン重巡８０００トンぐらいだと思っておりましたので。はい。
まあ、巡洋戦艦もクラスとしてはない国もありますし。
まあコメントの意味合いとしてはいきなり４００００トンの戦艦と軽巡の間が欲しかったかなということです。
今回ソ連艦で統一しているのですが、現時点で実装されているソ連艦艇の中で重巡洋艦は無く、ソ連はロンドン海軍軍縮条約の規定的に言えば明らかに重巡洋艦クラスであるものを軽巡洋艦とカテゴリしている事が多く、クロンシュタットもゲームでは巡洋戦艦なのですがあっちでは重巡洋艦とカテゴライズされていたりします（武装と排水量で明らか戦艦なのですが）この動画ではゲーム内の艦種表示に則っています。
@@WT_Wolf 中巡って感じの艦でしかも旗艦だから区分けは難しいですね
I enjoyed the video thanks for this amazing content and strumtiger sinking a battle cruiser is alright it is 305mm HE
Sturmtiger shells are much smaller than the shels of battle ships
The interesting part is after finally getting the strum mouser I actually wanted to test this theory I would like to see more tests so that is to know the full extent with every battleship
命中率高すぎぃw
0:25
吹いたw
Hysterically good fun. That's my favorite so far 👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏
At 00.30; tank commander was a former U boat skipper. ... old habits...
Just think: Normandy would have failed if 4 Sturm tigers were at the beaches.. lol
Apparently that one SturmTiger thinks it's a submarine!
戦艦の主砲や副砲はこんな近距離のしかもあんな小さな目標を狙うようには出来てないと思うので、本来は港の沖から対地攻撃用の主砲弾の雨を降らせるんでしょうね。
ソ連重巡の副砲と軽巡の主砲は何mmだろう？
15.2mmか12.7mmか？
戦車砲より砲身が長い高初速な上に駆逐戦車より高い位置からの砲撃だから、被弾経始されず貫通すると思うが。
ヒトラーも38cm口径の戦車は夢があったんやろなぁ
戦艦を前にアワアワ動いてて可愛い